• Contact Us
  • Indexing
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Open Access
  • Journals
  • Home
  • ISSN: 2333-6641
    Volume 5, Issue 1
    Research Article
    Mohamed S. Abbas* and Hany Maher
    Background: We conducted this study to reach up to a safer and effective spinal anesthetic drug for use in high risk geriatric patients undergoing major lower limb surgery by comparing intrathecal isobaric ropivacaine with the commonly used intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine in such group of patients.
    Methods: Fifty two geriatric patients ASA grade II–III undergoing elective total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgery under spinal anesthesia were randomized into two groups. Group I including patients who received 12.5 mg (2.5 ml) of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% and group II including patients who received 15 mg (3ml) of isobaric ropivacaine 0.5%. The extent and duration of sensory and motor block and hemodynamics including heart rate (HR), non invasive mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and respiratory depression were recorded.
    Results: Successful block has been attained in all patients in both groups. There were significant statistical difference between the two groups as regards onset time to T10 (group I 7 ± 1.85 min ; group II 10.3 ± 1.34 min; P < 0.001), time to maximal sensory level (group I 21.27 ± 9.37 min; group II 26.5 ± 7.21 min; P < 0.028) , median maximum sensory extent (group I T6 ; group II T8; P < 0.031), duration of T10 anesthesia (group I 93 ± 10.37 min ; group II 60 ± 10.92 min; P < 0.001) and onset time to maximal motor block (group I 8.5 ± 1.2 min; group II 12.8 ± 1.6 min; P < 0.001). The total duration of both sensory block (group I 180 ± 20 min vs. group II 150 ± 25 min; P < 0.001) and motor block (group I 160 ± 10.92 min vs. group II 130 ± 13.61 min; P < 0.001) were shorter in the ropivacaine group significantly but sufficient for surgery. In addition, ropivacaine caused less hemodynamic complications such as hypotension, bradycardia and respiratory depression than did bupivacaine.
    Conclusion: Isobaric ropivacaine 15 mg can be used to provide a reliable spinal anesthesia for geriatric patients undergoing total knee replacement surgery that is comparable to that of the commonly used hyperbaric bupivacaine 12.5 mg as regards the efficacy of the block with a shorter recovery profile and less hemodynamic derangement.
    The study was registered on www.clinicaltrials.gov, Registration ID: NCT02764723, Registered June 6, 2016.
    Antonio Weingartshofer, Heather Mingo, Blaine Kent, Jean-Francois Legare, Karen Buth, and Myron M. Kwapisz*
    Purpose: A retrospective chart review was performed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of fibrinogen concentrate as an additional treatment option for excessive bleeding in cardiac surgery.
    Methods: Data from patients receiving fibrinogen concentrate between January 2010 and June 2013 was retrospectively collected from the Maritime Heart Centre database for Cardiac Surgery and from patients’ electronic charts at the Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre.
    Results: In total, data for 50 patients receiving fibrinogen concentrate were collected. On average, patients were 60.7 years of age and 68% were male. Baseline laboratory characteristics were slightly lower than reference ranges, possibly due to the high number of urgent or emergency procedures (36%). Patients received fibrinogen concentrate as an additional line of treatment for bleeding and also received, on average, a total of 8.8 units of blood products: 4.3 units of packed red blood cells, 2.5 units of fresh frozen plasma, 1.5 units of platelets and 0.5 units of cryoprecipitate. The overall transfusion rate was 94%. Two patients (4%) suffered from in-hospital stroke and the overall mortality rate was 18%.
    Conclusion: Patients received a relatively high number of blood components despite receiving fibrinogen concentrate as an additional line of treatment for blood loss. As the study was retrospective in nature, it has significant limitations and demonstrates the importance of considering confounding variables, including different transfusion triggers among anesthetists. However, the study does demonstrate the need for a larger-scale randomized prospective study to fully understand the effects of fibrinogen concentrate.
  • Current Issue Highlights
  • JSciMed Central welcomes back astronaut Scott Kelly and cosmonaut Mikhail Kornienko.
    Readmore...

    Wonder Women Tech not only disrupted the traditional conference model but innovatively changed the way conferences should be held.
    Readmore...

    Novice Researcher Educational Edition
    JSciMed Central Peer-reviewed Open Access Journals
    10120 S Eastern Ave, Henderson,
    Nevada 89052, USA
    Tel: (702)-751-7806
    Toll free number: 1-800-762-9856
    Fax: (844)-572-4633 (844-JSCIMED)
    E-mail: anesthesiology@jscimedcentral.com
    anesthesiology@j-scimedcentral.org
    1455 Frazee Road, Suite 570
    San Diego, California 92108, USA
    Tel: (619)-373-8720
    Toll free number: 1-800-762-9856
    Fax: (844)-572-4633 (844-JSCIMED)
    E-mail: anesthesiology@jscimedcentral.com anesthesiology@j-scimedcentral.org
    About      |      Journals      |      Open Access      |      Special Issue Proposals      |      Guidelines      |      Submit Manuscript      |      Contacts
    Copyright © 2016 JSciMed Central® All Rights Reserved
    Creative Commons Licence Open Access Publication by JSciMed Central® is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
    Based on a work at https://jscimedcentral.com/. Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at https://creativecommons.org/.