The basic principle of research is ensured by the process of peer review in open-access journals. A reviewer’s guidance to the editorial process is valuable, and as publishers, we look to perceive the endeavors of reviewers.
We are thankful to our peer reviewers and the tremendous commitment they make to the Journal. This is painstakingly wrapped up by reviewers.
Peer reviewers put in long periods of work to pass judgment on the quality and significance of the work and afterward they decide whether an article is to be accredited, revised, or rejected.
We would love to thank the Reviewers for taking the vital effort and time to study the manuscript. We honestly recognize all your valuable comments and suggestions, which helped us in improving the quality of the manuscript.
We would like to take this opportunity to thank you for the effort and expertise that you contributed towards reviewing the article, without which it might be impossible to maintain the high standards of peer-reviewed journals.
Annals of Otolaryngology and Rhinology journal appreciate the hard work and dedication of the reviewers. Our editorial team has set up a reviewer appreciation program, which included certificates, listing on the reviewers’ page, and discounts in publishing.
As our submissions continue to grow, so does the need to expand our reviewer pool. Please encourage interested colleagues to join; they can become reviewers for the Journal by going to the Reviewers Pool and creating an account.
Different ways reviewers currently receive recognition vary from journal to journal and might consist of:
Being covered in a journal’s annual list of reviewers. This is the most widely recognized type of acknowledgment.
Getting a letter or certificate of contribution from the journal.
You will receive a discount offer on APC from the journal via email, you can avail of the offer for publishing your paper in any of our JsciMed Central Journals (in a Calendar year).
Our most recent functionality to the Reviewer Pool allows reviewers to create a Reviewer Page, posting all their individual peer review evaluation activities. Reviewers can make a total outline of their review history open by means of a personalized URL. We absolutely respect the confidentiality of the peer evaluation procedure and will not match reviewers to individual articles.