People living with speech and language disorders are often subject to social maltreatment relative to their peers with normal speech. It features data from one-on-one interactions with students living with speech and language disorders. The data is analyzed by considering the nature of the disorder (NOD); the rate of its interference with communication (ROI); the respondent’s personal efforts at controlling the interference (PEC); perceived social attitude against the affected (PSA); response of the affected to the social attitude (RSA); the level of awareness of the cause of the disorder (AOC), and the level of awareness of clinical remedy to the disorder. Varied levels of experience are discovered after the analysis. This case study is significant for several reasons. This research shifts focus from the predominant paediatric and clinical populations and prevalence counts to examine the interrelated dimensions. The findings supply empirical grounding for advocacy aimed at reducing stigma and expanding access to speech-language services within the higher-education sector. More research in the area is recommended for wider coverage, and improved social reorientation should be pursued on a massive scale to end this negative social classification