The Reduced Frequency of Olfactory Dysfunction in Patients with Omicron SARS-CoV-2 Variant Infection

Review Article | Open Access | Volume 9 | Issue 5

  • 1. Department of Zabludowicz Center for Autoimmune Diseases, Sheba Medical Center, Israel
  • 2. Department of Internal Medicine B, Sheba Medical Center, Israel
  • 3. Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Israel
  • 4. Laboratory of the Mosaics of Autoimmunity, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University), Russia
+ Show More - Show Less
Corresponding Authors
Yonatan Shneor Patt, Department of Zabludowicz Center for Autoimmune Diseases, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel, Tel: 972-50-5302340

Anosmia is a prevalent symptom of COVID-19 and has become almost synonymous with COVID-19 infection. It is known to emerge as either the sole symptom of the infection or at least prior to other symptoms. Surprisingly, it has been shown that the phenomenon is much less common in the COVID-19 Omicron variant infection compared with other previous variants of the disease. Our review explores several theories explaining the reduced frequency of olfactory dysfunction among the Omicron variant infected patients. Regarding viral host cell invasion, the process may occur by two distinct routes involving either the plasma cell membrane fusion or by viral uptake via endocytosis. The Omicron variant prefers using the endosomal pathway, which is less dependent on transmembrane serine protease 2 (TMPRSS2) activation. Therefore, the Omicron penetration of the olfactory epithelium, which expresses high levels of TMPRSS2, is less efficient and leads to the reduced frequency of anosmia. Moreover, the less-dependent TMPRSS2 pathway of the Omicron variant diminishes its ability to produce syncytia arrangement, a phenomenon associated with more severe symptoms. In addition, the new mutations make the Omicron variant more hydrophobic and alkaline, which may reduce its ability to appropriately penetrate the mucosal layer. Furthermore, there is evidence to show that the Omicron variant produces a milder inflammatory response and less of a cytokine storm. In conclusion, anosmia is much less common symptom within the Omicron variant, however, the expeditious spread of the Omicron can still lead to a significant number of patients with olfactory dysfunction.


COVID-19; SARS-COV-2; smell; Omicron variant; Anosmia; Olfactory dysfunction; Transmembrane serine protease 2 (TMPRSS2)


Patt YS, David P, Bergwerk M, Shoenfeld Y (2022) The Reduced Frequency of Olfactory Dysfunction in Patients with Omicron SARS-CoV-2 Variant Infection. Ann Otolaryngol Rhinol 9(5): 1302.


Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the illness caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARSCoV-2), was first reported in Wuhan, China, in December 2019 [1]. Since then, the virus has spread, with the World Health Organization (WHO) declaring the COVID-19 a worldwide pandemic on March 11th, 2020. Extensive international efforts have been done in an attempt to produce a viable vaccine for the disease [2]. Nevertheless, despite the current vaccinations, the pandemic continues to cause devastation with more than 6.3 million casualties so far.

One of the most significant explanations for the failure to control the pandemic despite the emergence of the vaccines are the viral adaptive mutations in its genome. The different variants of the virus may evade the immune system even among vaccinated and previously infected patients [3]. Due to genomic mutations, the newer strains could potentially have entirely different characteristics in comparison with the previous stains, including transmissibility, virulence and symptomatology.

The current Coronavirus variant of concern is the Omicron (B.1.1.529) strain, first reported in South Africa in November 2021 [4]. Mohsin et al. [5], presented several studies in their literature review, which demonstrated a faster spreading of the Omicron variants than other variants, particularly among both vaccinated and boosted individuals [6]. On the other hand, all the studies consistently reported a significantly decreased risk of severe disease. Thus, the Omicron variant may have a lower risk of hospital admissions, ICU hospitalizations, mechanical ventilation as well as shorter duration of hospitalization and lower mortality rates (5,7).

Smelling alterations

Covid-19 has been characterized by a wide spectrum of symptoms, particularly fever, and cough, shortness of breath and myalgia. Olfactory dysfunction (OD), including anosmia and hyposmia, is another prominent symptom that has been described in different COVID-19 variants (8).

In a meta-analysis with 23,533 patients diagnosed with COVID-19, the reported prevalence of anosmia was 38% (9). In an Iranians study, with a cohort of 10,069 patients, the rate of anosmia was even higher with 76.24% of patients reporting a sudden onset of OD and 60.90% reporting persistent anosmia from the beginning of the pandemic (10). Interestingly, it has also been reported that many patients present with anosmia as their sole symptom or at least as the symptom presenting prior to others (11). Accordingly, there are attempts to identify or confirm infected patients based on self-reported changes in olfaction (8,12).

Surprisingly, the reported prevalence of OD in the Omicron variant is lower. Based on 12 reports of 190,778 patients, Butowt et al. (13) calculated a pooled weighted estimate of olfactory dysfunction of 13%, which is a significantly lower rate than in the aforementioned reports. In another study, the authors conducted a comparison between 338 patients infected during the Omicron prevalent period to 441 infected patients in the comparator period, in which other strains were more prevalent. They found out that the prevalence of self-reported OD during the Omicron period was significantly lower from the prevalence reported in the comparator previously periods (32.5% vs 66.9% respectively) (14).

In a novel Brazilian retrospective study, the authors examined 6,053 patients with confirmed mild COVID-19 cases and compared the prevalence of anosmia between different periods with different variants including original lineages (B.1.1.28 and B.1.1.33), Gamma, Delta and Omicron periods. A lineage was considered predominant when it was detected in more than 90% of the COVID-19 infected patients during a specific period. In their cohort, 2,650 participants reported OD, with lowering odds of anosmia for patients infected during Omicron period compared to the original lineage period (5.8% vs. 52.6% respectively, adjusted OR 0.07, PV<0.001). Even after additional adjustment for vaccination status, the OD during the Omicron period was significantly lower in comparison with the Gamma period.

Our study aimed to clarify the reasoning for Omicron variant sparing of OD compared to previous variants.

Pathophysiology of olfactory dysfunction

Despite numerous studies, the exact mechanism of COVID-19- induced anosmia remains unclear. Generally, olfactory problems may be classified as either a conductive or sensorineural impairments. In conductive impairments, some pathologies such as nasal polyps and rhinosinusitis, may block inspired odorants from reaching the olfactory epithelium in the nasal cavity. On the other hand, in sensorineural impairments, the dysfunction is attributed to an injury of the olfactory receptor neurons or other sensory structures (15). It is reasonable to assume that conductive loss of COVID-19 infected patients does not play a significant role in patients anosmia since the prevalence of obstruction is quite low in COVID-19 infection (14,16).

The olfactory mucosa is composed of the olfactory epithelium and the lamina propria. Different types of cells are found in the olfactory epithelium, including olfactory sensory neurons, sustentacular cells, and basal stem cells. Olfactory sensory neurons are the neuronal receptor cells responsible for the smelling function. Sustentacular cells are associated with structural support and participate in phagocytosis of dead neurons (17), odorant transformation and metabolizing enzymes (18). Basal cells of the olfactory epithelium act as stem cells and can generate new sensory neurons and sustentacular cells throughout life (19).

In a literature review, Meng et al (20,21) summarized various well-known theories for COVID-19-induced anosmia. The angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor and the transmembrane serine protease 2 (TMPRSS2) have been described as key factors responsible for the invasion and fusion of the virion to the host cell (22). Hence, cells with high quantities of these receptors are more susceptible to viral infection.

Brann et al. (23) found that ACE2 receptors are not expressed in olfactory sensory neurons and instead, the receptors were observed in sustentacular and in basal cells of the epithelium. It is possible that damage to sustentacular cells may lead to impaired olfactory function even without viral transferring to the sensory neurons. The damage is due to either their role in detoxification of airborne pollutants, their capability of supplying metabolites, or their involvement in the signal transduction of smell (24). Indeed, in studies using hamster models, there is evidence to suggest viral accumulation specifically in sustentacular cells only (25). However, there is no evidence regarding infection of basal stem cells. If the basal cell are indeed damaged, it may explain why a small portion of COVID-19 patients suffer from persistent long-term anosmia (24,26) as the basal cells are responsible for regeneration of new neurons and sustentacular cells.

Nevertheless, Zazhytska et al. (16) claimed that in comparison with hamster models, the viral load in human olfactory epithelium is lower due to infrequent sustentacular cells infection. Therefore, they suggested another explanation for COVID-19-induced anosmia involving the ability to impair the olfactory function without infection of the epithelium and even the sustentacular cells. Thus, the virus causes a dramatic reorganization of the neuronal nuclear architecture which results in modifying of genomic compartments harboring olfactory receptor genes including their signaling pathway.

Moreover, it is well known that the spike protein D614G mutation among COVID-19 variants may intensify the infection of sustentacular cells by enhancing membrane fusion. Accordingly, COVID-19 variants with D614G mutation may have a higher prevalence of anosmia (27).

Another important possible mechanism involves the presence of a local or systemic inflammatory process. Several different cytokines such as TNF-α and IL-6 could impair the olfactory function, either by interfering with the cell-signaling process, or by direct destruction of the olfactory epithelium. Indeed, elevated levels of TNF-α were found in the olfactory epithelium of infected patients (28), and a correlation was discovered between IL-6 blood levels to dysosmia (change in the smelling ability) status (29).

A less popular explanation relates to the adaptive response of locally decreased nasopharyngeal zinc. Zinc deficiencies result in a lower ACE-2 expression, and thereby decrease the invasion of the virions to the host cell. The phenomenon was exhibited in other pathogens causing respiratory illness (30).

The Omicron variant sparing of the olfactory function

To understand the ranges of anosmia prevalence in Omicron infections compared to other variants, we should properly evaluate the above mechanisms described for COVID-19-induced anosmia. It may be explained by various mechanisms such as host cell entry, inflammatory process and vaccination status.

Different mechanisms of viral host cell invasion

It is critical to mention that in comparison with other variants, the Omicron variant carries the D614G mutation as well as identical affinity to the ACE2 receptor (13). Nevertheless, in hamster models, the Omicron infection caused only mild pathological changes of the olfactory epithelium in comparison with previous identified variants such as SARS-CoV-2 614G, Gamma and Delta (31). Moreover, Bentley et al. (32) found that viral loads in nasal tissue and nasopharyngeal swabs were significantly lower in Omicron-infected mice than Pango B lineage or Delta variants.

Viral membrane fusion, the process by which enveloped viruses enter host cells, may occur by 2 distinct routes - either at the plasma cell membrane or in endosomes upon virus uptake by endocytosis (33). In general, COVID-19 variants enter host cells by surface membrane fusion involving the TMPRSS2, mentioned above. However, the Omicron variant prefers using the endosomal pathway, which is less dependent on TMPRSS2 activation. Hence, the Omicron invasion of sustentacular cells, which express high rate of TMPRSS2, is less efficient, and therefore probably leads to the reduced frequency of anosmia (13).

In a literature review, Rodriguez-Selliva et al. (26) clarified that the Omicron variant has a broader spectrum of target cells and a more rapid replication compared to other variants, due to its ability to invade host cells by both mechanisms. Nonetheless, the less-dependent TMPRSS2 activation course diminishes the affinity for syncytia arrangement. A syncytium is a multinucleate cell resulting from multiple cell fusions of uninuclear cells (34) and can form due to infection with certain types of viruses, such as HSV-1, HIV, RSV and SARS-CoV-2. The phenomenon has been associated with symptoms severity in animal model and accordingly, variants without syncytia arrangement would result in milder disease.

Another theory regarding the viral invasion of its host cell is the penetration of the mucus layer, which protects the olfactory epithelium from toxins and pathogens. It seems that hydrophilic and acidic proteins are more soluble and may easily go through the mucus layer. However, the mutations of the Omicron variant generate more hydrophobic and alkaline proteins, with lower solubility characteristics and consequently cause decreased epithelium infection (13).

Inflammatory processes of different COVID-19 variants

It is possible that the Omicron variant produces only a milder inflammatory response and less of cytokine storm (26). Bauer et al. (35), examined the difference of neuroinvasion and neuroinflammation among SARS-COV-2 variants using the hamster model. They demonstrated that the hamsters infected with Omicron variant showed less inflammatory lesions within the olfactory mucosa compared to Delta and D614G variants. Yet, there is not a satisfactory explanation as to why the Omicron variant induces a decreased inflammatory response.

Availability of Vaccines in different variant periods

Boscolo-Rizzo et al. (14), examined the clinical presentation in patients infected during the Omicron period compared to previous periods. Based on the study results, they concluded that the prevalence of the smell and taste dysfunction was lower significantly in the Omicron period. One of the possible explanations for the difference is the vaccination status of the patients in the Omicron period, which may reduce symptoms severity. For various reasons, this suggestion was rejected.

In their cohort study, no difference in anosmia prevalence was found depending on the vaccination status. Second, the vaccine protection is induced mainly by the generation of IgG antibodies and cytotoxic T cells, which less effective than IgA at producing mucosal immune response. Third, the Omicron period emerged in the post vaccination era and as mentioned previously, the vaccine was less effective against this variant. So, it is unreasonable to assume that the vaccine would protect only from the olfactory function and not from other symptoms. Finally, in the Delta variant period, olfactory changes were one of the most frequent symptoms, even among vaccinated patients. In summary, it seems that the vaccination status does not play a significant role in preventing the olfactory impairments among Omicron infected patients.


Anosmia is a characteristic and prevalent symptom of COVID-19 which emerges as a sole symptom or prior to others. Surprisingly, it is much less common within the Omicron variant and in this review, several theories are suggested for the phenomenon. Additional studies are required in order to confirm the aforementioned theoretical explanations.

The absence of the unique symptom may make the distinction of COVID-19 from other viral diseases more difficult and thus potentially delay the diagnosis and the isolation of the infected patients.

The reduced prevalence of OD in the Omicron period should not lead to decrease in the intensive efforts and research regarding COVID-19-induced anosmia. Even in the Omicron period, the reported prevalence of olfactory problems was approximately 10-30%, with numerous affected patients. Moreover, the increased spread of the Omicron variant can still lead to a significant number of patients with olfactory problems (14).


1. Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020; 395: 497–506.

2. Wang J, Peng Y, Xu H, Cui Z, Williams RO. The COVID-19 Vaccine Race: Challenges and Opportunities in Vaccine Formulation. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2020; 21: 1–12.

3. Abdul Aleem, Abdul Bari Akbar Samad, Amy K. Slenker Emerging Variants of SARS-CoV-2 And Novel Therapeutics Against Coronavirus (COVID-19) - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf. 2022.

4. Gowrisankar A, Priyanka TMC, Banerjee S. Omicron: a mysterious variant of concern. Eur Phys J Plus. 2022; 137: 100.

5. Mohsin M, Mahmud S. Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern: A review on its transmissibility, immune evasion, reinfection, and severity. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022; 101: 29165.

6. Lyngse FP, Mortensen LH, Denwood MJ, Christiansen LE, Møller CH, Skov RL, et al. SARS-CoV-2 Omicron VOC Transmission in Danish Households. medRxiv. 2021.

7. Lewnard JA, Hong VX, Patel MM, Kahn R, Lipsitch M, Tartof SY. Clinical outcomes among patients infected with Omicron (B.1.1.529) SARSCoV-2 variant in southern California. medRxiv. 2022.

8. David P, Shoenfeld Y. The Smell in COVID-19 Infection: Diagnostic Opportunities. Isr Med Assoc J. 2020; 22: 401–3.

9. Von Bartheld CS, Butowt R, Hagen MM. Prevalence of Chemosensory Dysfunction in COVID-19 Patients: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis Reveals Significant Ethnic Differences. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2020; 11: 2944–61.

10.Bagheri SH, Asghari A, Farhadi M, Shamshiri AR, Kabir A, Kamrava SK, et al. Coincidence of COVID-19 epidemic and olfactory dysfunction outbreak in Iran. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2020; 34.

11.Mcmichael TM, Brostrom-Smith C, Kawakami V, Baure D, Benoliel E, County K, et al. Alterations in Smell or Taste in Mildly Symptomatic Outpatients With SARS-CoV-2 Infection. JAMA [Internet]. 2020; 323: 2089–90.

12.Vaira LA, Salzano G, Petrocelli M, Deiana G, Salzano FA, De Riu G. Validation of a self-administered olfactory and gustatory test for the remotely evaluation of COVID-19 patients in home quarantine. Head Neck. 2020; 42: 1570–6.

13.Butowt R, Bili K, Bartheld C Von. Why Does the Omicron Variant Largely Spare Olfactory Function?? Implications for the Pathogenesis of Anosmia in Coronavirus Disease 2019. J Infect Dis. 2022; 1–5.

14.Boscolo?Rizzo P, Tirelli G, Meloni P, Hopkins C, Madeddu G, De Vito A, et al. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related smell and taste impairment with widespread diffusion of severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron variant. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2022; 12: 1273-1281.

15.Goncalves S, Goldstein BJ. Pathophysiology of Olfactory Disorders and Potential Treatment Strategies. Curr Otorhinolaryngol Rep. 2016; 4: 115–21.

16.Zazhytska M, Kodra A, Hoagland DA, Frere J, Fullard JF, Shayya H, et al. Non-cell-autonomous disruption of nuclear architecture as a potential cause of COVID-19-induced anosmia. Cell. 2022;185: 1052-1064.e12.

17.Y Suzuki 1, M Takeda, AI Farbman. Supporting cells as phagocytes in the olfactory epithelium after bulbectomy - PubMed. J Comp Neurol. 2022.

18.Heydel JM, Coelho A, Thiebaud N, Legendre A, Bon AM Le, Faure P, et al. Odorant-binding proteins and xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes: implications in olfactory perireceptor events. Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2013; 296: 1333–45.

19.Imamura F, Hasegawa-Ishii S. Environmental Toxicants-Induced Immune Responses in the Olfactory Mucosa. Front Immunol. 2016; 7.

20.Meng X, Pan Y. COVID-19 and anosmia: The story so far. Ear Nose Throat J. 2021;

21.Meng X, Deng Y, Dai Z, Meng Z. COVID-19 and anosmia: A review based on up-to-date knowledge. Am J Otolaryngol. 2020; 41: 102581.

22.Hoffmann M, Kleine-Weber H, Schroeder S, Krüger N, Herrler T, Erichsen S, et al. SARS-CoV-2 Cell Entry Depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and Is Blocked by a Clinically Proven Protease Inhibitor. Cell. 2020; 181: 271-280.e8.

23.Brann DH, Tsukahara T, Weinreb C, Lipovsek M, Van Den Berge K, Gong B, et al. Non-neuronal expression of SARS-CoV-2 entry genes in the olfactory system suggests mechanisms underlying COVID-19- associated anosmia. Sci Adv. 2020; 6.

24.Bilinska K, Butowt R. Anosmia in COVID-19: A Bumpy Road to Establishing a Cellular Mechanism. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2020; 11: 2152–5.

25.Bryche B, St Albin A, Murri S, Lacôte S, Pulido C, Ar Gouilh M, et al. Massive transient damage of the olfactory epithelium associated with infection of sustentacular cells by SARS-CoV-2 in golden Syrian hamsters. Brain Behav Immun. 2020; 89: 579–86.

26.Rodriguez-Sevilla JJ, Güerri-Fernádez R, Bertran Recasens B. Is There Less Alteration of Smell Sensation in Patients With Omicron SARSCoV-2 Variant Infection? Front Med [Internet]. 2022; 9.

27.Von Bartheld CS, Hagen MM, Butowt R. The D614G Virus Mutation Enhances Anosmia in COVID-19 Patients: Evidence from a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Studies from South Asia. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2021; 12: 3535–49.

28.Torabi A, Mohammadbagheri E, Akbari Dilmaghani N, Bayat AH, Fathi M, Vakili K, et al. Proinflammatory Cytokines in the Olfactory Mucosa Result inCOVID-19 Induced Anosmia. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2020; 11: 1909–13.

29.Cazzolla AP, Lovero R, Lo Muzio L, Testa NF, Schirinzi A, Palmieri G, et al. Taste and Smell Disorders in COVID-19 Patients: Role of Interleukin-6. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2020; 11: 2774–81.

30.Propper RE. Smell/Taste alteration in COVID-19 may reflect zinc deficiency. J Clin Biochem Nutr. 2021; 68: 3.

31.Federico Armando, Georg Beythien, Franziska K Kaiser, Lisa Allnoch, Laura Heydemann, Malgorzata Rosiak, Svenja Becker, et al. SARSCoV-2 Omicron variant causes mild pathology in the upper and lower respiratory tract of Syrian golden hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus). Nat Portf. 2022; 13: 3519.

32.Bentley EG, Kirby A, Sharma P, Kipar A, Mega DF, Bramwell C, et al. SARS-CoV-2 Omicron-B.1.1.529 Variant leads to less severe disease than Pango B and Delta variants strains in a mouse model of severe COVID-19. bioRxiv. 2021.

33.Weissenhorn W, Hinz A, Gaudin Y. Virus membrane fusion. Febs Lett. 2007; 581: 2150.

34.Daubenmire RF. The Use of the Terms Coenocyte and Syncytium in Biology. Science. 1936; 84: 533.

35.Bauer L, Rissmann M, Benavides FFW, Leijten L, Begeman L, Kroeze EV, et al. Differences in neuroinflammation in the olfactory bulb between D614G, Delta and Omicron BA.1 SARS-CoV-2 variants in the hamster model. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2022; 10: 124.

Patt YS, David P, Bergwerk M, Shoenfeld Y (2022) The Reduced Frequency of Olfactory Dysfunction in Patients with Omicron SARS-CoV-2 Variant Infection. Ann Otolaryngol Rhinol 9(5): 1302.

Received : 29 Sep 2022
Accepted : 17 Oct 2022
Published : 19 Oct 2022
Annals of Otolaryngology and Rhinology
ISSN : 2379-948X
Launched : 2014
JSM Schizophrenia
Launched : 2016
Journal of Nausea
Launched : 2020
JSM Internal Medicine
Launched : 2016
JSM Hepatitis
Launched : 2016
JSM Oro Facial Surgeries
ISSN : 2578-3211
Launched : 2016
Journal of Human Nutrition and Food Science
ISSN : 2333-6706
Launched : 2013
JSM Regenerative Medicine and Bioengineering
ISSN : 2379-0490
Launched : 2013
JSM Spine
ISSN : 2578-3181
Launched : 2016
Archives of Palliative Care
ISSN : 2573-1165
Launched : 2016
JSM Nutritional Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3203
Launched : 2017
Annals of Neurodegenerative Disorders
ISSN : 2476-2032
Launched : 2016
Journal of Fever
ISSN : 2641-7782
Launched : 2017
JSM Bone Marrow Research
ISSN : 2578-3351
Launched : 2016
JSM Mathematics and Statistics
ISSN : 2578-3173
Launched : 2014
Journal of Autoimmunity and Research
ISSN : 2573-1173
Launched : 2014
JSM Arthritis
ISSN : 2475-9155
Launched : 2016
JSM Head and Neck Cancer-Cases and Reviews
ISSN : 2573-1610
Launched : 2016
JSM General Surgery Cases and Images
ISSN : 2573-1564
Launched : 2016
JSM Anatomy and Physiology
ISSN : 2573-1262
Launched : 2016
JSM Dental Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1548
Launched : 2016
Annals of Emergency Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1017
Launched : 2016
Annals of Mens Health and Wellness
ISSN : 2641-7707
Launched : 2017
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Health Care
ISSN : 2576-0084
Launched : 2018
Journal of Chronic Diseases and Management
ISSN : 2573-1300
Launched : 2016
Annals of Vaccines and Immunization
ISSN : 2378-9379
Launched : 2014
JSM Heart Surgery Cases and Images
ISSN : 2578-3157
Launched : 2016
Annals of Reproductive Medicine and Treatment
ISSN : 2573-1092
Launched : 2016
JSM Brain Science
ISSN : 2573-1289
Launched : 2016
JSM Biomarkers
ISSN : 2578-3815
Launched : 2014
JSM Biology
ISSN : 2475-9392
Launched : 2016
Archives of Stem Cell and Research
ISSN : 2578-3580
Launched : 2014
Annals of Clinical and Medical Microbiology
ISSN : 2578-3629
Launched : 2014
JSM Pediatric Surgery
ISSN : 2578-3149
Launched : 2017
Journal of Memory Disorder and Rehabilitation
ISSN : 2578-319X
Launched : 2016
JSM Tropical Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2578-3165
Launched : 2016
JSM Head and Face Medicine
ISSN : 2578-3793
Launched : 2016
JSM Cardiothoracic Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1297
Launched : 2016
JSM Bone and Joint Diseases
ISSN : 2578-3351
Launched : 2017
JSM Bioavailability and Bioequivalence
ISSN : 2641-7812
Launched : 2017
JSM Atherosclerosis
ISSN : 2573-1270
Launched : 2016
Journal of Genitourinary Disorders
ISSN : 2641-7790
Launched : 2017
Journal of Fractures and Sprains
ISSN : 2578-3831
Launched : 2016
Journal of Autism and Epilepsy
ISSN : 2641-7774
Launched : 2016
Annals of Marine Biology and Research
ISSN : 2573-105X
Launched : 2014
JSM Health Education & Primary Health Care
ISSN : 2578-3777
Launched : 2016
JSM Communication Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3807
Launched : 2016
Annals of Musculoskeletal Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3599
Launched : 2016
Annals of Virology and Research
ISSN : 2573-1122
Launched : 2014
JSM Renal Medicine
ISSN : 2573-1637
Launched : 2016
Journal of Muscle Health
ISSN : 2578-3823
Launched : 2016
JSM Genetics and Genomics
ISSN : 2334-1823
Launched : 2013
JSM Anxiety and Depression
ISSN : 2475-9139
Launched : 2016
Clinical Journal of Heart Diseases
ISSN : 2641-7766
Launched : 2016
Annals of Medicinal Chemistry and Research
ISSN : 2378-9336
Launched : 2014
JSM Pain and Management
ISSN : 2578-3378
Launched : 2016
JSM Women's Health
ISSN : 2578-3696
Launched : 2016
Clinical Research in HIV or AIDS
ISSN : 2374-0094
Launched : 2013
Journal of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Obesity
ISSN : 2333-6692
Launched : 2013
Journal of Substance Abuse and Alcoholism
ISSN : 2373-9363
Launched : 2013
JSM Neurosurgery and Spine
ISSN : 2373-9479
Launched : 2013
Journal of Liver and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2379-0830
Launched : 2014
Journal of Drug Design and Research
ISSN : 2379-089X
Launched : 2014
JSM Clinical Oncology and Research
ISSN : 2373-938X
Launched : 2013
JSM Bioinformatics, Genomics and Proteomics
ISSN : 2576-1102
Launched : 2014
JSM Chemistry
ISSN : 2334-1831
Launched : 2013
Journal of Trauma and Care
ISSN : 2573-1246
Launched : 2014
JSM Surgical Oncology and Research
ISSN : 2578-3688
Launched : 2016
Annals of Food Processing and Preservation
ISSN : 2573-1033
Launched : 2016
Journal of Radiology and Radiation Therapy
ISSN : 2333-7095
Launched : 2013
JSM Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
ISSN : 2578-3572
Launched : 2016
Annals of Clinical Pathology
ISSN : 2373-9282
Launched : 2013
Annals of Cardiovascular Diseases
ISSN : 2641-7731
Launched : 2016
Journal of Behavior
ISSN : 2576-0076
Launched : 2016
Annals of Clinical and Experimental Metabolism
ISSN : 2572-2492
Launched : 2016
Clinical Research in Infectious Diseases
ISSN : 2379-0636
Launched : 2013
JSM Microbiology
ISSN : 2333-6455
Launched : 2013
Journal of Urology and Research
ISSN : 2379-951X
Launched : 2014
Journal of Family Medicine and Community Health
ISSN : 2379-0547
Launched : 2013
Annals of Pregnancy and Care
ISSN : 2578-336X
Launched : 2017
JSM Cell and Developmental Biology
ISSN : 2379-061X
Launched : 2013
Annals of Aquaculture and Research
ISSN : 2379-0881
Launched : 2014
Clinical Research in Pulmonology
ISSN : 2333-6625
Launched : 2013
Journal of Immunology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2333-6714
Launched : 2013
Annals of Forensic Research and Analysis
ISSN : 2378-9476
Launched : 2014
JSM Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
ISSN : 2333-7109
Launched : 2013
Annals of Breast Cancer Research
ISSN : 2641-7685
Launched : 2016
Annals of Gerontology and Geriatric Research
ISSN : 2378-9409
Launched : 2014
Journal of Sleep Medicine and Disorders
ISSN : 2379-0822
Launched : 2014
JSM Burns and Trauma
ISSN : 2475-9406
Launched : 2016
Chemical Engineering and Process Techniques
ISSN : 2333-6633
Launched : 2013
Annals of Clinical Cytology and Pathology
ISSN : 2475-9430
Launched : 2014
JSM Allergy and Asthma
ISSN : 2573-1254
Launched : 2016
Journal of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
ISSN : 2334-2307
Launched : 2013
Annals of Sports Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2379-0571
Launched : 2014
JSM Sexual Medicine
ISSN : 2578-3718
Launched : 2016
Annals of Vascular Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2378-9344
Launched : 2014
JSM Biotechnology and Biomedical Engineering
ISSN : 2333-7117
Launched : 2013
Journal of Hematology and Transfusion
ISSN : 2333-6684
Launched : 2013
JSM Environmental Science and Ecology
ISSN : 2333-7141
Launched : 2013
Journal of Cardiology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2333-6676
Launched : 2013
JSM Nanotechnology and Nanomedicine
ISSN : 2334-1815
Launched : 2013
Journal of Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders
ISSN : 2475-9473
Launched : 2016
JSM Ophthalmology
ISSN : 2333-6447
Launched : 2013
Journal of Pharmacology and Clinical Toxicology
ISSN : 2333-7079
Launched : 2013
Annals of Psychiatry and Mental Health
ISSN : 2374-0124
Launched : 2013
Medical Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
ISSN : 2333-6439
Launched : 2013
Annals of Pediatrics and Child Health
ISSN : 2373-9312
Launched : 2013
JSM Clinical Pharmaceutics
ISSN : 2379-9498
Launched : 2014
JSM Foot and Ankle
ISSN : 2475-9112
Launched : 2016
JSM Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementia
ISSN : 2378-9565
Launched : 2014
Journal of Addiction Medicine and Therapy
ISSN : 2333-665X
Launched : 2013
Journal of Veterinary Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2378-931X
Launched : 2013
Annals of Public Health and Research
ISSN : 2378-9328
Launched : 2014
Annals of Orthopedics and Rheumatology
ISSN : 2373-9290
Launched : 2013
Journal of Clinical Nephrology and Research
ISSN : 2379-0652
Launched : 2014
Annals of Community Medicine and Practice
ISSN : 2475-9465
Launched : 2014
Annals of Biometrics and Biostatistics
ISSN : 2374-0116
Launched : 2013
JSM Clinical Case Reports
ISSN : 2373-9819
Launched : 2013
Journal of Cancer Biology and Research
ISSN : 2373-9436
Launched : 2013
Journal of Surgery and Transplantation Science
ISSN : 2379-0911
Launched : 2013
Journal of Dermatology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2373-9371
Launched : 2013
JSM Gastroenterology and Hepatology
ISSN : 2373-9487
Launched : 2013
Annals of Nursing and Practice
ISSN : 2379-9501
Launched : 2014
JSM Dentistry
ISSN : 2333-7133
Launched : 2013
Author Information X