Loading

Annals of Breast Cancer Research

Identifying Barriers and Decision Making for Breast Cancer Screening Among Black Caribbean Women by Using Clustering and Cart Methods

Research Article | Open Access | Volume 7 | Issue 1

  • 1. Department of Epidemiology, Florida International University, Robert Stempel College of Public Health and Social Work, United States
  • 2. Department of Biostatistics, Florida International University, Robert Stempel College of Public Health and Social Work, United States
  • 3. Department of Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Florida International University, Robert Stempel College of Public Health and Social Work, United States
  • 4. Department of Global and Sociocultural Studies, Florida International University, Steven J Green School of International & Public Affairs, United States
+ Show More - Show Less
Corresponding Authors
Nasar U Ahmed, Department of Epidemiology, Florida International University, Robert Stempel College of Public Health and Social Work, United States
Abstract

Breast cancer is the most common form of cancer among women worldwide. Mammography is the only viable and effective, most used method for breast cancer screening, with recommendations being updated based on newly acquired knowledge. It is well-documented that Black women have higher incidence rates of breast cancer and are more likely to be diagnosed with late stage of the disease and worse health outcomes. Black Caribbean women especially have even more late-stage diagnoses and higher mortality rates. The purpose of this study is to identify barriers to breast cancer screening and the decision-making patterns in health-seeking behaviors among Black Caribbean women living in South Florida and using the identified needs to recommend possible solutions to address their needs. Using secondary data from a cross-sectional survey, descriptive analyses were performed, followed by Dendrograms for identifying cluster of barriers and Classification and Regression Trees for exploring the women’s decision-making process for screening. Five clusters were identified amongst the 124 self-identified Black Caribbean women: Healthcare and Cultural Beliefs, Barriers, Healthcare Seeking, Age, and Geographical Location. The Classification and Regression Trees recognized decision making in healthcare seeking practice indicating physician’s recommendations, and age as the main influencers for screening adherence. There is a need to increase awareness and knowledge about breast cancer screenings and overall female reproductive health and develop an appropriate, culturally sensitive screening programs to address these needs.

Keyword

Breast Cancer,  Black Caribbean,  Women, Health Disparities, Epidemiology

CITATION

Rodriguez AD, Veledar E, Rojas P, Tardanico R, Pekovic V, et al. (2023) Identifying Barriers and Decision Making for Breast Cancer Screening Among Black Caribbean Women by Using Clustering and Cart Methods. Ann Breast Cancer Res 7(1): 1023.

INTRODUCTION

Globally, over 7.8 million women live with breast cancer, making it the most prevalent cancer amongst women [1]. Recent data showed the annual incidence of breast cancer was 2.3 million new diagnoses and 685,000 deaths in 2020 [1]. In the United States, breast cancer also ranks top common cancer amongst women, besides skin cancers [2]. It is estimated that for the year 2023, there will be approximately 350,000 new cases of breast cancer and an estimated 43,000 deaths in the USA [2]. The probability of being diagnosed with breast cancer increased globally for women from 1 in 11 (9.1%) in 1975 to 1 in 8 in (12.5%) 2011 [3]. Studies have found that breast cancer incidence and mortality rates differ greatly based on race and ethnicity of the women [3]. Although Non-Hispanic White women have higher incidence rate of breast cancer when compared with Black women, mortality rates are 40% higher amongst Black women than non-Hispanic White women [4,5]. Regardless of race and ethnicity, the five-year survival rates for stage 0 or I are almost 100% compared with those diagnosed at stage IV 22% [6]. It is well-documented that higher morbidity and mortality rates along with higher late-stage diagnoses are associated with low screening rates [7].

Mammography is the only feasible and effective procedure for breast cancer screening. According to the American Cancer Society (ACS), women aged 45-54, who are of average risk for breast cancer, should undergo a mammography every year while women who are at high risk should get a breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) along with a mammography annually starting by age 30 [8]. Early detection through screenings is one of the best approaches for prevention [9].

Since the early 2000s, breast cancer incidence rates have increased annually by 0.5% [10]. Race-ethnicity played a noticeable role in this regard. Non-Hispanic White and non Hispanic Black women have higher incidence of breast cancer when compared to women of other racial and ethnic backgrounds, and incidence of breast cancer before age 45 is higher for nonHispanic Black women than non-Hispanic White women [3,11]. Black women are disproportionally diagnosed with more aggressive forms of breast cancer as well as diagnosed at much more advanced stages than any other race/ethnicity [11,12]. Mortality rates are 42% higher in Black women than White women and, Black women have lower 5-year survival rates when compared to White women, 83% vs 92% respectively [10,11].

When looking at Black women living in the US, Black Caribbean women receive breast cancer screenings at much lower rates than US-born Black women [13]. Furthermore, Black Caribbean born women are more likely to be diagnosed with breast cancer at a younger age when compared to US-born Black women [14].

Numerous studies have investigated the ethnic differences amongst Blacks and Whites; however, very limited studies have studied the variations within Black subgroups, particularly Black Caribbean women. Black women should not be treated as a monolithic group as one in ten Blacks in the US is foreignborn, with the immigration population is expected to reach 36% by 2065 [15,16]. Unfortunately, in high-concentrated Black Caribbean zip codes, late-stage diagnosis and mortality statistics are significantly high too [17]. It is imperative to address the differential burdens of breast cancer screenings among Black Caribbean women, hence this study aims to identify needs and decision-making patterns in heath-seeking behaviors and beliefs of Black Caribbean women living in South Florida in relation to utilization of the mammography as a tool for breast cancer screening.

 

METHODS

Measures

Secondary data from a cross-sectional survey was used for this study. The survey consisted of 105 yes/no, true/false, structured multiple-choice or open-ended questions. The questionnaire was developed based on literature, focus groups, and validated questions from national surveys [13]. The questionnaires were self-administered, and no personally identifiable information was collected.

Prior to enrolling, participants were asked about their ancestry and their background, those who had Black Caribbean ancestry and/or identified as a Black Caribbean were enrolled. For this study, we analyzed questions focused on demographic and socio-economic factors, social support system, overall breast cancer knowledge, barriers to breast cancer screenings, and overall breast cancer screening practices.

Participants

The study consisted of 124 Black Caribbean women who resided in Broward County, Florida. IRB approval was obtained, and participants were provided consent forms. The participants were informed that their participation was voluntary, and any questions that they may find uncomfortable was at their discretion to answer. Participants were compensated for their time and those who declined to participate were provided an educational handout on cervical cancer prevention from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The questionnaires were completed anonymously with no personally identifiable information collected.

Broward County is the second largest county and is an urban and industrialized county in Southeastern Florida. According to the US Census, Broward’s population is estimated to be 1,930,983, with 62.5% identifying as White, 32% identifying as Black or African American, and 31.1% identifying as Hispanic or Latino in 2021 [18]. West Indians (Black Caribbean) make up approximately 18% of the population, with Haitians and Jamaicans making up approximately 6% each, respectively; approximately 34% of the residents of Broward County are foreign-born [18].

Participants were recruited from community centers, such as religious centers, medical centers, medical offices, recreational centers, and other community-centered locations such as city hall in from January 2019 until April 2019.

Statistical

Methods All statistical analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics for Mac, version 27. The alpha level for statistical significance was set at 0.05. Frequencies and percentages were calculated for categorical variables, and means, medians, and standard deviations were calculated for continuous variables. Cross-tabulations and correlations were also conducted.

A dendrogram was created to visualize and comprehend screening behavior patterns amongst the study participants using clustering methods and Ward’s minimum variance methods. Classification and Regression Trees (CART) were constructed to describe any associations within the data and to provide visual representation of the decision-making patterns in relation to breast cancer screening practices and adherence. This method uses a machine learning algorithm that is used for prediction, creating a tree-like structure where each node represents a decision based on the Gini Impurity Index, a specifically identified predictor variable, and is continued for each branch tracing a possible outcome decision process [19]. The CART method is an appropriate method for this analysis not only because it is most likely to select independent variables that are different from the dependent variable, but it is best used to describe any associations within the data. Two CART were constructed for this study using the comparative variable Current vs. Not Current with Mammography, where current with mammography is defined as having undergone a mammography for the purpose of breast cancer screening within the past year.

RESULTS

Demographics

The study was comprised of 124 female participants with an average age of 49 (SD = 14.2). Self-identified African American/ Black represented approximately 45% of the sample, followed by other 34%. Of those who selected other for race/ethnicity, 15% identified as Guyanese and 11% identified as West Indian. The sample consisted of 24% participants born in the United States, 22% born in Trinidad & Tobago, 21% born in Guyana, and 33% born in other Caribbean islands (Table 1).

Breast Cancer Screening Practices

When asked about the time of their last mammography, 22% of participants had never received one while 49% had received one within the past two years. 6% of those who were under the age of 39 have never undergone a mammography screening when compared to 16% of those aged 40 and older. Additionally, those aged 40 and older were more likely to have undergone a mammography screening within the past year when compared to younger participants (42% vs 7%, respectively).

Several participants (74%) said their Primary Care Physician (PCP) recommended they receive mammography. Additionally, several participants (65%) said they first heard of mammography from their PCP. Most participants identified that their insurance covered mammography as part of their annual check-ups (71% and 87%, respectively).

Breast Cancer Knowledge and Beliefs

While over half of participants (52%) did not know the cause of breast cancer, most participants were able to identify risk factors and symptoms associated with breast cancer. A large majority of participants (88%) were able to identify family history of breast cancer as a risk factor for breast cancer. Of the six possible choices, 7% of participants were unable to identify any risk factors and 71% were unable to identify all commonly known risk factors. Finding a new lump in the breast or in the underarm was the most identified symptom of breast cancer (90%). Of the eight possible choices, 9% of participants were unable to identify any symptoms while 49% were unable to identify all common symptoms.

About 22% believe that a diagnoses of breast cancer was a death sentence. When asked if they believed breast cancer was a common cancer, 81% of participants agreed. Almost half of participants (45%) had family members who were diagnosed with cancer, of which breast cancer was the most common diagnoses (30%). A vast majority of participants did not believe that mammography screenings were against their cultural beliefs or their religious beliefs (92% and 93%, respectively). When asked if they believed that early detection of breast cancer meant increased chances of being cured as well as increased chances of living longer, most participants agreed (86% and 94%, respectively). Additionally, 91% of participants believed that there were effective treatments for breast cancer.

Dendrogram Findings

All predictor variables were included in the creation of the dendrogram, which produced five clusters with the first cluster containing the most variables (Figure 1).

Dendrogram of Predictor Variables.

Figure 1: Dendrogram of Predictor Variables.

The first cluster, Healthcare and Cultural Beliefs, consists of whether the mammography was recommended by their PCP, place of birth based on Caribbean islands, and their relationship status. The second cluster, Barriers, consists of whether transportation is a barrier to obtaining a mammography. The third cluster, Healthcare Seeking, consists of the time of their last annual check-up. The fourth cluster, Age, contains the age range. The fifth and final cluster, Geographical Location, consists of place of birth including the US and all the Caribbean islands (Table 2).

CART Findings

Two CARTs were constructed for this study using the same outcome variable, Current vs. Not Current with Mammography. The first CART included all the predictor variables (Figure 2).

Classification and Regression Tree using current vs. Not current with Mammogram as the Predictor Variable.

Figure 2: Classification and Regression Tree using current vs. Not current with Mammogram as the Predictor Variable.

In this CART, the first variable of influence is whether their PCP recommended they undergo a mammography. For those who responded yes, time of their last annual check-up was most influential. Those who had an annual check-up more than two years ago were influenced by their place of birth in the Caribbean islands. For those who had an annual check-up less than two years ago, the barrier of transportation was most influential. For those who did not identify transportation, or lack thereof, as a barrier, their age was most influential. For those who were younger than 59, their relationship status was most influential.

The second CART (Figure 3) included all the predictor variables, with the variable Age selected as the influencer variable.

Classification and Regression Tree using Current vs. Not current with Mammogram as the Predictor Variable, with Age as Influence

Figure 3: Classification and Regression Tree using Current vs. Not current with Mammogram as the Predictor Variable, with Age as Influence

Time of last annual check-up was most influential. For those who had an annual check-up more than two years ago, place of birth in the Caribbean islands was most influential. For those who had an annual check-up less than two years ago, whether their PCP recommended they undergo a mammography was most influential. Those whose PCPs did recommend they undergo a mammography were influenced by whether they believed transportation to be a barrier. For those who did not identify transportation, or lack thereof, as a barrier, their place of birth overall was most influential.

DISCUSSION

The goal of this study was to contribute to the promotion of screening strategies for breast cancer among Black Caribbean women in the US. By examining demographic and socio-economic factors, social support system, overall breast cancer knowledge, barriers to mammography for breast cancer screening, and overall breast cancer screening practices, our results highlighted three themes: healthcare beliefs and utilization, age, and place of birth.

As previously mentioned, mammography is one of the methods for breast cancer screenings. It has been used to detect breast cancer since the mid-1960’s and has been associated with a 15-25% reduction in breast-cancer related deaths [14,20]. Using mammography as a screening tool for breast cancer targets to detect the disease at an earlier, more curable stage [21]. Many of the study participants believed that using mammography for early detection of breast cancer meant that there were increased chances of being cured and increased chances of living longer. Over time, however, recommendations have been updated to reflect changes in incidence and prevalence of breast cancer. Ultimately, the decision of when to start mammography is up to the physician. Most participants said that they first heard about mammography and their importance from their healthcare providers, most of which first heard of mammography from their primary care physician.

Risk factors for breast cancer have been extensively studied and identified, which include gender, age, family history, physical activity, obesity, and hormone influences such as age of first period and age of onset of menopause [22-24]. Hormonal influences have been shown to increase the probability of breast cancer development, particularly increased exposure to progesterone [25]. Most participants were able to identify that having family history of breast cancer as a risk factor, as well as not being physically active, being overweight, taking hormones and oral contraceptives, and being pregnant at a later age.

Age plays a major role in both breast cancer screening behavior and disease development. Prior studies have concluded that the risk for developing breast cancer increases with age [26]. As previously stated, the ACS recommends women undergo a mammography starting at age 40 unless they present greater risk for developing the disease. Several studies have identified that women are more likely to develop the disease after menopause, which can occur between 45 to 55 years of age [27]. Additionally, women who have their first period at a young age and women who are older than 50 at the start of menopause, are of increased risk for breast cancer [28]. Studies have found that Black women are diagnosed with breast cancer at an earlier age when compared to White women, 54 vs 61[29]. Additionally, Black women were found to be diagnosed at later stages of disease, regardless of age [30]. Our results showed that women aged 20-39 were more likely to have never received a mammography, while women who were 60 and older were both more likely to have received a mammography and to be following recommendations set forth by the governing bodies.

In addition to age, place of birth also appears to play a role in breast cancer knowledge and screening behaviors. When it comes to overall cancer knowledge and beliefs, one study found that Caribbean women were likely to have ill-perceived notions on breast cancer as well as incomplete knowledge on overall breast cancer risk factors [31]. Additionally, this study also found that misconceptions about breast cancer, including risk factors, negatively affected screening behavior [31]. Our study found that participants who were born in the US were more likely to have received a mammography at least once in their lifetime compared to Caribbean-born women. Our study also found that while most participants were able to correctly identify at least one risk factor for breast cancer, they were unable to identify the cause of breast cancer.

There are a few limitations associated with this study. Given the cross-sectional design of the study, follow-up with the participants to measure if the questionnaire prompted any new behaviors, such as more consistent screening practices or even improved communications with their healthcare providers was not feasible. The questionnaires were self-complete, which can lead to non-response bias as some questions may be uncomfortable for some participants to respond to, however, the anonymity and privacy provided to participants makes this unlikely. Furthermore, this is a convenient, snowball sample. The participants were recruited at local community centers where selection bias may have impacted recruitment and may not adequately represent the desired population. However, efforts had been made to recruit sample from ethnic grocery stores and low-income clinics to lower the bias. Despite possible limitations, these findings may stand as a useful contribution to addressing the gap in literature.

Our methods identified areas requiring improved intervention including increasing knowledge and awareness, understanding cultural influences, and sympathizing with age. This study has shown how healthcare seeking behavior and beliefs, along with age, and place of birth all play an active role in breast cancer screening behavior and overall breast cancer knowledge. Some studies have suggested incorporating intervention strategies at various levels including policy and healthcare such as promoting early detection [32,33]. However, few studies have researched the complexity of the social and cultural differences within racial and ethnic backgrounds and the role it plays when it comes to healthcare seeking behavior, this study can serve as the catalyst for further investigation.

CONCLUSION

Our study has found points of intervention when interpreting breast cancer screening behaviors amongst Black Caribbean women. Increasing awareness and knowledge as well as understanding how age affects behavior were observed as areas for improvement. Understanding healthcare-seeking patterns and promoting annual visits with primary care physicians also revealed to be imperative in promoting and increasing breast cancer screenings.

There is a need to create and implement appropriate, culturally sensitive screening programs and campaigns to increase awareness and knowledge about breast cancer screenings and overall female reproductive health. A user-friendly, multi-level approach is necessary to reach underserved women, all focusing on at-risk women, the clinicians that attend to them, and local public health officials. With the immigrant population expected to continue to rise exponentially, it is imperative that we create the tools and the proper environment for women of all cultural and social backgrounds to become informed about breast cancer and perhaps start to bridge the gap.

Funding Source

The seed funding was received from the Dean of Stempel of College of Public Health & Social Work (FIU Grant #2430020008). The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

REFERENCES

1. World Health Organization. Breast Cancer. 2023.

2. American Cancer Society. How Common Is Breast Cancer? 2023.

3. Yedjou CG, Sims JN, Miele L, Noubissi F, Lowe L, Fonseca DD, et al. Health and Racial Disparity in Breast Cancer. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2019; 1152: 31-49. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-20301-6_3. PMID: 31456178; PMCID: PMC6941147.

4. Jatoi I, Sung H, Jemal A. The Emergence of the Racial Disparity in U.S. Breast-Cancer Mortality. N Engl J Med. 2022; 386(25): 2349-2352. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2200244. Epub 2022 Jun 18. PMID: 35713541.

5. Hirko KA, Rocque G, Reasor E, Taye A, Daly A, Cutress RI, et al. The impact of race and ethnicity in breast cancer-disparities and implications for precision oncology. BMC Med. 2022; 20(1): 72. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02260-0. PMID: 35151316; PMCID: PMC8841090.

6. Fadi M Alkabban, Troy Ferguson. Breast cancer. Statpearls. 2022.

7. Mobley LR, Tangka FKL, Berkowitz Z, Miller J, Hall IJ, Wu M, et al. Geographic Disparities in Late-Stage Breast Cancer Diagnosis Rates and Their Persistence Over Time. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2021; 30(6): 807-815. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2020.8728. Epub 2021 Apr 29. PMID: 33926216; PMCID: PMC8420944.

8. American Cancer Society. American Cancer Society recommendations for the early detection of breast cancer. 2022.

9. Sun YS, Zhao Z, Yang ZN, Xu F, Lu HJ, Zhu ZY, et al. Risk Factors and Preventions of Breast Cancer. Int J Biol Sci. 2017; 13(11): 1387-1397. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.21635. PMID: 29209143; PMCID: PMC5715522.

10. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2023. 2023.

11. DeSantis CE, Fedewa SA, Goding Sauer A, Kramer JL, Smith RA, Jemal A. Breast cancer statistics, 2015: Convergence of incidence rates between black and white women. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016; 66(1): 31- 42. doi: 10.3322/caac.21320. Epub 2015 Oct 29. PMID: 26513636.

12. Barreto-Coelho P, Cerbon D, Schlumbrecht M, Parra CM, Hurley J, George SHL. Differences in breast cancer outcomes amongst Black US-born and Caribbean-born immigrants. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019; 178(2): 433-440. doi: 10.1007/s10549-019-05403-9. Epub 2019 Aug 14. PMID: 31414243; PMCID: PMC7039732.

13. Nasar U Ahmed, Cheryl Brewster, Catherina Chang-Martinez, Lakisha Thomas-DeVlugt, Anny Rodriguez. Dignity, Shame, Stigma, or Ignorance in Avoidance of Breast and Cervical Cancer Screenings among Women of Caribbean Descent. Open Journal of Social Sciences. 2022. 10(5); 496-508.

14. Taioli E, Attong-Rogers A, Layne P, Roach V, Ragin C. Breast cancer survival in women of African descent living in the US and in the Caribbean: effect of place of birth. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010; 122(2): 515-520. doi: 10.1007/s10549-009-0702-9. Epub 2010 Jan 6. PMID: 20052539.

15. Parker K, Krogstad JM. One-in-Ten Black People Living in the U.S. Are Immigrants. Pew Research Center. 2022.

16. Colby SL, Ortman JM. Projections of the size and composition of the US population: 2014 to 2060. 2015.

17. Kobetz E, Mendoza AD, Barton B, Menard J, Allen G, Pierre L, et al. Mammography use among Haitian women in Miami, Florida: an opportunity for intervention. J Immigr Minor Health. 2010; 12(3): 418-421. doi: 10.1007/s10903-008-9193-8. Epub 2008 Oct 8. PMID: 18841475.

18. US Census Bureau quick facts: Broward County, Florida. United States Census Bureau. 2022.

19. Lemon SC, Roy J, Clark MA, Friedmann PD, Rakowski W. Classification and regression tree analysis in public health: methodological review and comparison with logistic regression. Ann Behav Med. 2003; 26(3): 172-181. doi: 10.1207/S15324796ABM2603_02. PMID: 14644693.

20. Kuhl CK. The Changing World of Breast Cancer: A Radiologist’s Perspective. Invest Radiol. 2015; 50(9): 615-628. doi: 10.1097/ RLI.0000000000000166. PMID: 26083829; PMCID: PMC4623842.

21. Løberg M, Lousdal ML, Bretthauer M, Kalager M. Benefits and harms of mammography screening. Breast Cancer Res. 2015; 17(1): 63. doi: 10.1186/s13058-015-0525-z. PMID: 25928287; PMCID: PMC4415291.

22. Majeed W, Aslam B, Javed I, Khaliq T, Muhammad F, Ali A, et al. Breast cancer: major risk factors and recent developments in treatment. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014; 15(8): 3353-3358. doi: 10.7314/ apjcp.2014.15.8.3353. PMID: 24870721.

23. Escala-Garcia M, Morra A, Canisius S, Chang-Claude J, Kar S, Zheng W, et al. Breast cancer risk factors and their effects on survival: a Mendelian randomisation study. BMC Med. 2020; 18(1): 327. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01797-2. PMID: 33198768; PMCID: PMC7670589.

24. Kashyap D, Pal D, Sharma R, Garg VK, Goel N, Koundal D, et al. Global Increase in Breast Cancer Incidence: Risk Factors and Preventive Measures. Biomed Res Int. 2022; 2022: 9605439. doi: 10.1155/2022/9605439. PMID: 35480139; PMCID: PMC9038417.

25. Trabert B, Sherman ME, Kannan N, Stanczyk FZ. Progesterone and Breast Cancer. Endocr Rev. 2020; 41(2): 320-344. doi: 10.1210/ endrev/bnz001. PMID: 31512725; PMCID: PMC7156851.

26. Hennis AJ, Hambleton IR, Wu SY, Leske MC, Nemesure B; Barbados National Cancer Study Group. Breast cancer incidence and mortality in a Caribbean population: comparisons with African-Americans. Int J Cancer. 2009; 124(2): 429-433. doi: 10.1002/ijc.23889. PMID: 18844211; PMCID: PMC2659611.

27. National Institute on Aging. What is menopause? 2021.

28. Wilkinson L, Gathani T. Understanding breast cancer as a global health concern. Br J Radiol. 2022; 95(1130): 20211033. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20211033. Epub 2021 Dec 14. PMID: 34905391; PMCID: PMC8822551.

29. Danforth DN Jr. Disparities in breast cancer outcomes between Caucasian and African American women: a model for describing the relationship of biological and nonbiological factors. Breast Cancer Res. 2013; 15(3): 208. doi: 10.1186/bcr3429. PMID: 23826992; PMCID: PMC3706895. 

30. Iqbal J, Ginsburg O, Rochon PA, Sun P, Narod SA. Differences in breast cancer stage at diagnosis and cancer-specific survival by race and ethnicity in the United States. JAMA. 2015; 313(2): 165- 173. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.17322. Erratum in: JAMA. 2015 Jun 9;313(22):2287. PMID: 25585328.

31. Consedine NS, Magai C, Spiller R, Neugut AI, Conway F. Breast cancer knowledge and beliefs in subpopulations of African American and Caribbean women. Am J Health Behav. 2004; 28(3): 260-271. doi: 10.5993/ajhb.28.3.7. PMID: 15152885.

32. Borgquist S, Hall P, Lipkus I, Garber JE. Towards Prevention of Breast Cancer: What Are the Clinical Challenges? Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2018; 11(5): 255-264. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-16-0254. Epub 2018 Apr 16. PMID: 29661853.

33. Ginsburg O, Yip CH, Brooks A, Cabanes A, Caleffi M, Dunstan Yataco JA, et al. Breast cancer early detection: A phased approach to implementation. Cancer. 2020; 126 Suppl 10(Suppl 10): 2379-2393. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32887. PMID: 32348566; PMCID: PMC7237065.

Rodriguez AD, Veledar E, Rojas P, Tardanico R, Pekovic V, et al. (2023) Identifying Barriers and Decision Making for Breast Cancer Screening Among Black Caribbean Women by Using Clustering and Cart Methods. Ann Breast Cancer Res 7(1): 1023.

Received : 01 Sep 2023
Accepted : 16 Sep 2023
Published : 18 Sep 2023
Journals
Annals of Otolaryngology and Rhinology
ISSN : 2379-948X
Launched : 2014
JSM Schizophrenia
Launched : 2016
Journal of Nausea
Launched : 2020
JSM Internal Medicine
Launched : 2016
JSM Hepatitis
Launched : 2016
JSM Oro Facial Surgeries
ISSN : 2578-3211
Launched : 2016
Journal of Human Nutrition and Food Science
ISSN : 2333-6706
Launched : 2013
JSM Regenerative Medicine and Bioengineering
ISSN : 2379-0490
Launched : 2013
JSM Spine
ISSN : 2578-3181
Launched : 2016
Archives of Palliative Care
ISSN : 2573-1165
Launched : 2016
JSM Nutritional Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3203
Launched : 2017
Annals of Neurodegenerative Disorders
ISSN : 2476-2032
Launched : 2016
Journal of Fever
ISSN : 2641-7782
Launched : 2017
JSM Bone Marrow Research
ISSN : 2578-3351
Launched : 2016
JSM Mathematics and Statistics
ISSN : 2578-3173
Launched : 2014
Journal of Autoimmunity and Research
ISSN : 2573-1173
Launched : 2014
JSM Arthritis
ISSN : 2475-9155
Launched : 2016
JSM Head and Neck Cancer-Cases and Reviews
ISSN : 2573-1610
Launched : 2016
JSM General Surgery Cases and Images
ISSN : 2573-1564
Launched : 2016
JSM Anatomy and Physiology
ISSN : 2573-1262
Launched : 2016
JSM Dental Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1548
Launched : 2016
Annals of Emergency Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1017
Launched : 2016
Annals of Mens Health and Wellness
ISSN : 2641-7707
Launched : 2017
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Health Care
ISSN : 2576-0084
Launched : 2018
Journal of Chronic Diseases and Management
ISSN : 2573-1300
Launched : 2016
Annals of Vaccines and Immunization
ISSN : 2378-9379
Launched : 2014
JSM Heart Surgery Cases and Images
ISSN : 2578-3157
Launched : 2016
Annals of Reproductive Medicine and Treatment
ISSN : 2573-1092
Launched : 2016
JSM Brain Science
ISSN : 2573-1289
Launched : 2016
JSM Biomarkers
ISSN : 2578-3815
Launched : 2014
JSM Biology
ISSN : 2475-9392
Launched : 2016
Archives of Stem Cell and Research
ISSN : 2578-3580
Launched : 2014
Annals of Clinical and Medical Microbiology
ISSN : 2578-3629
Launched : 2014
JSM Pediatric Surgery
ISSN : 2578-3149
Launched : 2017
Journal of Memory Disorder and Rehabilitation
ISSN : 2578-319X
Launched : 2016
JSM Tropical Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2578-3165
Launched : 2016
JSM Head and Face Medicine
ISSN : 2578-3793
Launched : 2016
JSM Cardiothoracic Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1297
Launched : 2016
JSM Bone and Joint Diseases
ISSN : 2578-3351
Launched : 2017
JSM Bioavailability and Bioequivalence
ISSN : 2641-7812
Launched : 2017
JSM Atherosclerosis
ISSN : 2573-1270
Launched : 2016
Journal of Genitourinary Disorders
ISSN : 2641-7790
Launched : 2017
Journal of Fractures and Sprains
ISSN : 2578-3831
Launched : 2016
Journal of Autism and Epilepsy
ISSN : 2641-7774
Launched : 2016
Annals of Marine Biology and Research
ISSN : 2573-105X
Launched : 2014
JSM Health Education & Primary Health Care
ISSN : 2578-3777
Launched : 2016
JSM Communication Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3807
Launched : 2016
Annals of Musculoskeletal Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3599
Launched : 2016
Annals of Virology and Research
ISSN : 2573-1122
Launched : 2014
JSM Renal Medicine
ISSN : 2573-1637
Launched : 2016
Journal of Muscle Health
ISSN : 2578-3823
Launched : 2016
JSM Genetics and Genomics
ISSN : 2334-1823
Launched : 2013
JSM Anxiety and Depression
ISSN : 2475-9139
Launched : 2016
Clinical Journal of Heart Diseases
ISSN : 2641-7766
Launched : 2016
Annals of Medicinal Chemistry and Research
ISSN : 2378-9336
Launched : 2014
JSM Pain and Management
ISSN : 2578-3378
Launched : 2016
JSM Women's Health
ISSN : 2578-3696
Launched : 2016
Clinical Research in HIV or AIDS
ISSN : 2374-0094
Launched : 2013
Journal of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Obesity
ISSN : 2333-6692
Launched : 2013
Journal of Substance Abuse and Alcoholism
ISSN : 2373-9363
Launched : 2013
JSM Neurosurgery and Spine
ISSN : 2373-9479
Launched : 2013
Journal of Liver and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2379-0830
Launched : 2014
Journal of Drug Design and Research
ISSN : 2379-089X
Launched : 2014
JSM Clinical Oncology and Research
ISSN : 2373-938X
Launched : 2013
JSM Bioinformatics, Genomics and Proteomics
ISSN : 2576-1102
Launched : 2014
JSM Chemistry
ISSN : 2334-1831
Launched : 2013
Journal of Trauma and Care
ISSN : 2573-1246
Launched : 2014
JSM Surgical Oncology and Research
ISSN : 2578-3688
Launched : 2016
Annals of Food Processing and Preservation
ISSN : 2573-1033
Launched : 2016
Journal of Radiology and Radiation Therapy
ISSN : 2333-7095
Launched : 2013
JSM Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
ISSN : 2578-3572
Launched : 2016
Annals of Clinical Pathology
ISSN : 2373-9282
Launched : 2013
Annals of Cardiovascular Diseases
ISSN : 2641-7731
Launched : 2016
Journal of Behavior
ISSN : 2576-0076
Launched : 2016
Annals of Clinical and Experimental Metabolism
ISSN : 2572-2492
Launched : 2016
Clinical Research in Infectious Diseases
ISSN : 2379-0636
Launched : 2013
JSM Microbiology
ISSN : 2333-6455
Launched : 2013
Journal of Urology and Research
ISSN : 2379-951X
Launched : 2014
Journal of Family Medicine and Community Health
ISSN : 2379-0547
Launched : 2013
Annals of Pregnancy and Care
ISSN : 2578-336X
Launched : 2017
JSM Cell and Developmental Biology
ISSN : 2379-061X
Launched : 2013
Annals of Aquaculture and Research
ISSN : 2379-0881
Launched : 2014
Clinical Research in Pulmonology
ISSN : 2333-6625
Launched : 2013
Journal of Immunology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2333-6714
Launched : 2013
Annals of Forensic Research and Analysis
ISSN : 2378-9476
Launched : 2014
JSM Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
ISSN : 2333-7109
Launched : 2013
Annals of Gerontology and Geriatric Research
ISSN : 2378-9409
Launched : 2014
Journal of Sleep Medicine and Disorders
ISSN : 2379-0822
Launched : 2014
JSM Burns and Trauma
ISSN : 2475-9406
Launched : 2016
Chemical Engineering and Process Techniques
ISSN : 2333-6633
Launched : 2013
Annals of Clinical Cytology and Pathology
ISSN : 2475-9430
Launched : 2014
JSM Allergy and Asthma
ISSN : 2573-1254
Launched : 2016
Journal of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
ISSN : 2334-2307
Launched : 2013
Annals of Sports Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2379-0571
Launched : 2014
JSM Sexual Medicine
ISSN : 2578-3718
Launched : 2016
Annals of Vascular Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2378-9344
Launched : 2014
JSM Biotechnology and Biomedical Engineering
ISSN : 2333-7117
Launched : 2013
Journal of Hematology and Transfusion
ISSN : 2333-6684
Launched : 2013
JSM Environmental Science and Ecology
ISSN : 2333-7141
Launched : 2013
Journal of Cardiology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2333-6676
Launched : 2013
JSM Nanotechnology and Nanomedicine
ISSN : 2334-1815
Launched : 2013
Journal of Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders
ISSN : 2475-9473
Launched : 2016
JSM Ophthalmology
ISSN : 2333-6447
Launched : 2013
Journal of Pharmacology and Clinical Toxicology
ISSN : 2333-7079
Launched : 2013
Annals of Psychiatry and Mental Health
ISSN : 2374-0124
Launched : 2013
Medical Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
ISSN : 2333-6439
Launched : 2013
Annals of Pediatrics and Child Health
ISSN : 2373-9312
Launched : 2013
JSM Clinical Pharmaceutics
ISSN : 2379-9498
Launched : 2014
JSM Foot and Ankle
ISSN : 2475-9112
Launched : 2016
JSM Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementia
ISSN : 2378-9565
Launched : 2014
Journal of Addiction Medicine and Therapy
ISSN : 2333-665X
Launched : 2013
Journal of Veterinary Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2378-931X
Launched : 2013
Annals of Public Health and Research
ISSN : 2378-9328
Launched : 2014
Annals of Orthopedics and Rheumatology
ISSN : 2373-9290
Launched : 2013
Journal of Clinical Nephrology and Research
ISSN : 2379-0652
Launched : 2014
Annals of Community Medicine and Practice
ISSN : 2475-9465
Launched : 2014
Annals of Biometrics and Biostatistics
ISSN : 2374-0116
Launched : 2013
JSM Clinical Case Reports
ISSN : 2373-9819
Launched : 2013
Journal of Cancer Biology and Research
ISSN : 2373-9436
Launched : 2013
Journal of Surgery and Transplantation Science
ISSN : 2379-0911
Launched : 2013
Journal of Dermatology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2373-9371
Launched : 2013
JSM Gastroenterology and Hepatology
ISSN : 2373-9487
Launched : 2013
Annals of Nursing and Practice
ISSN : 2379-9501
Launched : 2014
JSM Dentistry
ISSN : 2333-7133
Launched : 2013
Author Information X