Loading

Annals of Breast Cancer Research

Knowledge and Attitudes towards Breastfeeding among Female Non-Nutrition Students at Sokoine University of Agriculture, Edward Moringe Campus, Morogoro, Tanzania

Research Article | Open Access | Volume 8 | Issue 1

  • 1. Health Secretary - President Office Reginal Secretariat and Local Government Authorities Tanzania
  • 2. Student- Sokoine University of Agriculture, Department of Food Technology, Nutrition and Consumer Sciences
+ Show More - Show Less
Corresponding Authors
Douglas G Ndeki, Health Secretary - President Office Reginal Secretariat and Local Government Authorities Tanzania
ABSTRACT

Background: Adequate nutrition during early childhood ensures optimal growth and development. Exclusive Breastfeeding (EBF) for the first six months of life, as recommended by the World Health Organization and United Nations Children’s Fund, provides unparalleled nutritional benefits.

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the knowledge, attitudes, and sources of information regarding exclusive breastfeeding among female non-nutrition students at Sokoine University of Agriculture, Edward Moringe Campus, in Morogoro.

Method: A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted from December 1, 2020, to April 31, 2021, among 150 purposively selected female students aged 20-33. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire covering personal details, attitudes, knowledge, and sources of information on exclusive breastfeeding. Analysis was performed using SPSS software version 22.

Results: The majority of respondents (48.0%) believed that breastfeeding should continue up to two years. About 50.7% agreed that breastfeeding should be on demand rather than scheduled. A significant portion (24.0%) strongly disagreed with giving pre-lacteal feeds, while 17.3% strongly agreed. Most respondents (31.3%) supported following vaccination schedules such as the polio vaccine. A notable 37.3% strongly disagreed that breastfeeding should be stopped during a child’s diarrheal episodes. However, 67.3% perceived formula feeding as superior to breastfeeding, and 35.5% disagreed that breastfeeding enhances mother-child bonding. Among the participants, 78.7% had heard about exclusive breastfeeding, with 46.7% learning from health professionals and relatives/friends, and 56.0% receiving detailed information on the topic.

Conclusion and Recommendations: The knowledge and attitudes towards exclusive breastfeeding among female university students were generally positive, although some misconceptions persisted. These gaps can be addressed through culturally sensitive, age-appropriate health education sessions and relevant reading materials. Future breastfeeding promotion programs should emphasize these aspects to improve understanding and practices.

INTRODUCTION

In Tanzania, breastfeeding is a vital practice deeply embedded in the cultural fabric of child rearing, offering unparalleled benefits for both infants and mothers. Breast milk provides all essential nutrients and energy for the first months of life and continues to support a child's nutritional needs during the second year [1]. Exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months is especially crucial, as it significantly reduces infant mortality by protecting against common childhood illnesses such as diarrhea and pneumonia [2]. Beyond its health benefits for infants, breastfeeding also reduces mothers' risks of ovarian and breast cancers and aids in birth spacing [3]. However, despite these well-documented advantages, breastfeeding practices in Tanzania remain suboptimal, primarily due to a lack of education and support, particularly in rural areas where healthcare resources are limited [4]. Undergraduate students, particularly those at institutions like the Sokoine University of Agriculture (SUA) in Morogoro, hold a unique position to influence and promote optimal breastfeeding practices. These young women are at the forefront of bridging the gap between traditional practices and modern health recommendations.

Research from Lebanon and Syria indicates that university students gene rally possess positive attitudes towards breastfeeding and average knowledge levels [5]. However, the knowledge and attitudes of Tanzanian university students, who are key potential advocates for breastfeeding within their communities, remain underexplored. Previous studies have predominantly focused on pregnant women, mothers, and rural men [6] overlooking the critical role of young, educated individuals in shaping future health practices. Understanding the knowledge and attitudes of this demographic is essential for developing effective, targeted breastfeeding promotion interventions tailored to the Tanzanian context. This study addresses the gap in current research by focusing on female university students at SUA, aiming to identify predictors of breastfeeding intentions and the factors influencing their decisions. This study seeks to answer the question: What are the knowledge and attitudes towards breastfeeding among female university students at SUA, and what factors predict their breastfeeding intentions? To address this question, we conducted a cross-sectional survey targeting female students at SUA. By analyzing their knowledge, attitudes, and intentions regarding breastfeeding, we aim to provide insights that can inform targeted interventions and support strategies to improve breastfeeding practices in Tanzania. This research will contribute to a better understanding of how young, educated women can play a pivotal role in promoting child health and survival through improved breastfeeding practices.

Research Settings

The study was conducted at Sokoine University of Agriculture in Tanzania, specifically at the Edward Moringe campus. This location was chosen due to its accessibility to a diverse population of female university students who are either mothers or expecting mothers. Given the importance of breastfeeding knowledge and practices for this demographic, the university setting provided an ideal environment for data collection.

Study Design

A cross-sectional research design was employed for this study to assess breastfeeding knowledge and attitudes among female university students at a specific point in time. This design was deemed appropriate as it allows for a snapshot of the current situation regarding breastfeeding practices and perceptions among the target population. Additionally, a cross-sectional study design is practical and cost-effective, making it suitable for obtaining data from a large and diverse sample within a limited timeframe.

Sampling and Sample Procedure

A simple random sampling technique was utilized to obtain the desired population, ensuring that each individual had an equal chance of being selected. The sample size chosen was 150 students, considering the constraints of time and budget. The targeted population comprised female students who had not yet experienced breastfeeding.

Tools for Data Collection

Data were collected through the use of a questionnaire and interview method. The questionnaire consisted of close-ended questions, including multiple-choice items, divided into three sections. Section A gathered personal details, while Sections B and C focused on attitudes and knowledge regarding breastfeeding, respectively. Additionally, Section D addressed the sources of information about breastfeeding. Open-ended questions allowed participants to express their views on breastfeeding knowledge and attitudes.

METHOD OF DATA COLLECTION

Respondents completed the questionnaires independently, while interviews were conducted using the questionnaire for those who preferred verbal responses. The data collection period was estimated to be one week to administer and collect the data efficiently. Descriptive statistics were employed to analyze the data, including the use of frequency distribution tables, graphs, and pie charts. Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 22 was utilized for data analysis, employing descriptive statistics such as frequencies, percentages, and tabulations to determine the distribution of characteristics of each variable in the study, ensuring valid conclusions.

Ethical Consideration

The approval to undertake this study was given by the Directorate of Research and Publication Ethical Review Board of Sokoine University of Agriculture with Ref No. and authorization of the Vice Chancellor dated 4th April 2021. The permit to conduct the study in the study area was obtained from University Management. Participants were given written informed consent f before participating in the study. Participation to the study was voluntary, and minimal risks confidentiality and privacy were maintained. Furthermore, the respondents were assigned with numbers so as to ensure maximum confidentiality of their information.

Demographic Characteristic of Respondents

Table 1 shows that a total of 150 participants were involved in this study, yielding a 100% response rate. The age distribution reveals that 47.3% of respondents are aged 20-24 years, 40.7% are 25–29 years, and 12% are 30-34 years, indicating a predominantly young demographic. The degree programs of respondents are varied, with 30% in BSc. Agriculture General, 25.3% in BSc. Forestry, 18.7% in BSc. Horticulture and 26% in BSc. Wildlife Management, demonstrating a balanced representation across disciplines. Marital status data shows that 77.3% of respondents are single, while 22.7% are married. This demographic profile, characterized by a majority of young, single individuals across diverse academic programs, provides valuable context for understanding the respondents' perspectives and experiences. The comprehensive representation ensures the reliability and relevance of the study findings, highlighting the respondents' educational and personal backgrounds effectively.

Table 1: Demographic Characteristics of Respondents.

Age of Respondents

Age Group

Frequency

Percentage

20-24

71

47.3

25–29

61

40.7

30–34

18

12

Total

150

100

Degree Program of Respondents

Degree

Frequency

Percentage

BSc. Agriculture general

45

30

BSc. Forestry

38

25.3

BSc. Horticulture

28

18.7

BSc. Wildlife management

39

26

Total

150

100

Marital Status of Respondents

Variables

Frequency

Percentage

Unmarried

116

77.3

Married

34

22.7

Total

150

100

Attitude of Respondents toward Breastfeeding

The survey data provides insights into perceptions and attitudes towards breastfeeding and related practices among a group of respondents. A significant majority (78.7%) support continuing breastfeeding up to 2 years, with 30.7% strongly agreeing and 48% agreeing, while only 17.4% are opposed and a small portion (4%) remains neutral. Regarding feeding frequency, half of the respondents (50.7%) agree that breastfeeding should be given every time, not just when babies want it, with 21.3% strongly agreeing. However, 22% are against this notion, and 6% are neutral. Opinions on giving pre-lacteal feeds are divided; 38.6% support the practice, while a similar portion (47.3%) is opposed, and 14% remain neutral. Opinions are mixed regarding stopping breastfeeding during a child’s diarrheal episode. While 58.6% believe breastfeeding should be stopped, 37.3% disagree, indicating that a significant portion opposes stopping breastfeeding during diarrhea. A smaller group (15.3%) remains neutral (Table 2).

A large majority (94%) believe formula feeding is better than breastfeeding, with 67.3% strongly agreeing and 26.7% agreeing, showing a strong preference for formula feeding among respondents. Only 4% strongly disagree, and a minimal 2% are neutral. Additionally, the belief that breastfeeding increases the mother-child relationship is not widely supported. Only 15.3% think breastfeeding enhances this relationship, while a notable 66% disagree. Moreover, 18.7% are neutral on this matter. Overall, the data reveals strong support for extended breastfeeding and mixed feelings about breastfeeding during diarrhea, with a significant preference for formula feeding over breastfeeding, and skepticism about the impact of breastfeeding on the mother-child relationship.

Knowledge of Respondents on Breastfeeding

The survey data in (Table 3) below provides insights into the knowledge and practices regarding breastfeeding among respondents. A majority (58%) correctly understand what exclusive breastfeeding entails. Nearly all respondents (90.7%) recognize that breast milk should be given to a baby immediately after birth. However, there is a lack of clarity about how soon after birth to initiate breastfeeding: 46.7% do not know, 22.7% believe it should be within half an hour, 21.3% think it should be from one to nine hours, and 6.7% have other unspecified beliefs.

A significant majority (78%) know that the first yellow milk, or colostrum, should be fed to the baby. Similarly, 78.7% agree that breastfeeding should continue for two years, while a small portion (3.3%) suggests otherwise. Opinions on the frequency of breastfeeding show that 46.7% believe it should be on demand, 43.3% think it should follow a specific schedule, and 10% have other views. Most respondents (66%) agree that breast milk should be given exclusively for the first 4-6 months before introducing food or water. An overwhelming majority (80.7%) believe that exclusive breastfeeding is beneficial to the child. Overall, the data indicates a strong awareness of the importance of breast milk immediately after birth and the benefits of exclusive breastfeeding, although there are gaps in knowledge about the optimal timing for initiating breastfeeding and feeding frequency.

Table 2: Attitude of the Respondents.

 

S. No

Variables Response

Frequency

Percentage

   1

 

 

 

 

 

Breastfeeding should be continued up to 2 years.

 

Strongly

46

30.7

agree

Agree

72

48

Neutral

6

4

Disagree

22

14.7

Strongly

4

2.7

disagree

   2

 

 

 

 

 

Breastfeeding should be given every time and not only when babies want.

 

Strongly

32

21.3

agree

Agree

76

50.7

Neutral

9

6

Disagree

28

18.7

Strongly

5

3.3

disagree

   3

 

 

 

 

 

 

Believe in giving pre lacteal feeds (Any food except mother’s milk provided to a newborn before initiating breastfeeding) to babies

Strongly

26

17.3

agree

Agree

32

21.3

Neutral

21

14

Disagree

36

24

Strongly

35

23.3

disagree

   4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Believe in following schedule such as polio vaccine, including the timing of all doses, which may be either recommended or compulsory.

 

Strongly

41

27.3

agree

Agree

47

31.3

Neutral

23

15.3

Strongly

4

2.7

agree

Agree

18

12

Neutral

32

21.3

Disagree

56

37.3

   5

 

 

Breastfeeding should be stopped when child has diarrheal episodes

Strongly

40

26.7

disagree

   6

 

 

 

 

 

Formula feeding better than breastfeeding

 

Strongly

101

67.3

agree

Agree

40

26.7

Neutral

3

2

Disagree

0

0

Strongly

6

4

disagree

   7

 

 

 

 

 

Breastfeeding increases mother child relationship.

 

Strongly

2

1.3

agree

Agree

21

14

Neutral

28

18.7

Disagree

53

35.3

Strongly

46

30.7

disagree

Source of Information on Breastfeeding

The data in (Table 4) below shows source of information for breastfeeding which underscores the influential role of healthcare professionals in educating individuals about the importance of colostrum, cited by 46.7% of respondents, while friends also contribute significantly, with 29.3% learning through peer networks. Traditional sources of knowledge, particularly family members and elders, strongly influence attitudes towards breastfeeding duration, with over half of respondents (56%) believing in continuing breastfeeding for up to two years based on familial guidance. This highlights the crucial role of both formal healthcare education and informal social networks, as well as traditional knowledge transmission, in shaping breastfeeding practices within the community.

DISCUSSION

This study aimed to evaluate the knowledge, attitudes, and sources of information regarding exclusive breastfeeding among female non-nutrition students at Sokoine University of Agriculture. Understanding the perceptions of this group is crucial because their views can significantly influence future generations' attitudes towards breastfeeding. The study identified both positive attitudes and notable misconceptions, highlighting areas where targeted education can improve breastfeeding practices. By addressing these gaps, we can promote healthier breastfeeding behaviors that align with global health guidelines.

Table 3: Knowledge the Respondents towards Respondents.

S.No

Variables

Response

Frequency

Percentage

   1

What is exclusive breastfeeding

Correct

87

58

   2

What should be given to the baby immediately after Birth

Breast milk

136

90.7

   3

 

 

 

How soon after birth should you put the baby on the breast

Does not know

70

46.7

Within half an hour

34

22.7

From 1hour to 9hour

32

21.3

Any other(specify)

10

6.7

   4

The first yellow milk/colostrum should be fed to the baby

Yes

117

78

   5

How long should the baby be breastfed

2years

118

78.7

   6

 

 

 

A baby should be often breastfed

Other (Specify)

5

3.3

On demand

70

46.7

After specific

65

43.3

amount of time

Other (Specify)

15

10

   7

Breast milk should be given to baby before introducing food or even water

4-6months

99

66

   8

Exclusive breastfeeding is beneficial to the child

Yes

121

80.7

The findings indicate that while participants generally held positive attitudes towards exclusive breastfeeding, significant misconceptions were evident. Many students agreed that breastfeeding should continue up to two years, rejected pre-lacteal feeds, and supported on-demand breastfeeding and adherence to vaccination schedules like the polio vaccine. However, a notable number believed that infant formula was superior to breast milk and did not support continued breastfeeding during a baby's illness, including episodes of diarrhea. These misconceptions contradict guidelines from the [1], which recommend continued breastfeeding during illness due to the protective effects of breast milk against infections.

Additional findings revealed that many students perceived formula feeding as offering more freedom to mothers, found breastfeeding in public to be unacceptable and embarrassing, and viewed formula feeding and breastfeeding as equally beneficial for the child. These attitudes reflect similar findings in studies from Lebanon, Syria, Saudi Arabia, and the United States, where societal attitudes and perceived convenience favor formula feeding [7]. Such beliefs underscore the need for educational programs that address the practical and social challenges of breastfeeding, emphasizing the long-term health benefits for both mother and child. Furthermore, the study revealed that students possessed considerable knowledge about certain aspects of exclusive breastfeeding, such as the importance of colostrum and the benefits of frequent breastfeeding. However, gaps were identified, particularly regarding the timing of initiating breastfeeding post-birth.

This suggests the necessity for comprehensive educational programs that address these gaps, promoting accurate knowledge and positive attitudes towards breastfeeding. The findings of this study concur with a study conducted by [8], which concluded that implementing breastfeeding education in schools, universities, and through mass media campaigns could significantly enhance knowledge and future breastfeeding intentions. The role of healthcare professionals emerged as crucial, with many students citing them as their primary source of breastfeeding information. This preference highlights the importance of professional guidance in shaping breastfeeding practices. Integrating breastfeeding education into routine healthcare services for adolescents, such as during clinic visits at Primary Health Centers, can be an effective strategy. This approach aligns with findings from the United States, where professional support was the most common source of breastfeeding information, followed by friends and relatives [9].

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, this study highlights both strengths and areas for improvement in breastfeeding knowledge and attitudes among female non-nutrition students at Sokoine University of Agriculture. While there is a strong foundation of positive attitudes towards exclusive breastfeeding, significant misconceptions need to be addressed through targeted educational programs. These programs should be culturally sensitive and designed to engage adolescents effectively, leveraging the influence of healthcare professionals. Future research could explore the impact of such educational interventions on breastfeeding practices, contributing to a broader understanding of how to support and promote exclusive breastfeeding in diverse populations.

REFERENCES
  1. World Health Organization. Global strategy for infant and young child feeding. Geneva: WHO. 2003.
  2. Kramer MS. Breastfeeding and child health outcomes: a review of the evidence. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2012; 26: 18-26.
  3. Stordal K. Breastfeeding and maternal health: a review of the benefits. Lancet. 2023; 401: 1234-1245.
  4. United Republic of Tanzania. National strategy for child survival. Dar es Salaam: Ministry of Health. 2022.
  5. Khresheh R. Knowledge and attitudes towards breastfeeding among university students in Lebanon and Syria. BMC Public Health. 2020; 20: 1125.
  6. Bulemela J. Factors influencing breastfeeding practices in rural Tanzania. J Health Popul Nutr. 2019; 37: 24-30.
  7. Alruwaily M. Breastfeeding practices and attitudes in Saudi Arabia and the United States: a comparative study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2023; 120: 103995.
  8. Rugusa S. The impact of breastfeeding education on future practices: a school-based intervention. J Educ Health Promot. 2021; 10: 84.
  9. Sutter E. Sources of breastfeeding information in the United States: a survey of adolescents. J Pediatr Nurs. 2018; 43:55-60.
Received : 24 Oct 2024
Accepted : 07 Nov 2024
Published : 11 Nov 2024
Journals
Annals of Otolaryngology and Rhinology
ISSN : 2379-948X
Launched : 2014
JSM Schizophrenia
Launched : 2016
Journal of Nausea
Launched : 2020
JSM Internal Medicine
Launched : 2016
JSM Hepatitis
Launched : 2016
JSM Oro Facial Surgeries
ISSN : 2578-3211
Launched : 2016
Journal of Human Nutrition and Food Science
ISSN : 2333-6706
Launched : 2013
JSM Regenerative Medicine and Bioengineering
ISSN : 2379-0490
Launched : 2013
JSM Spine
ISSN : 2578-3181
Launched : 2016
Archives of Palliative Care
ISSN : 2573-1165
Launched : 2016
JSM Nutritional Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3203
Launched : 2017
Annals of Neurodegenerative Disorders
ISSN : 2476-2032
Launched : 2016
Journal of Fever
ISSN : 2641-7782
Launched : 2017
JSM Bone Marrow Research
ISSN : 2578-3351
Launched : 2016
JSM Mathematics and Statistics
ISSN : 2578-3173
Launched : 2014
Journal of Autoimmunity and Research
ISSN : 2573-1173
Launched : 2014
JSM Arthritis
ISSN : 2475-9155
Launched : 2016
JSM Head and Neck Cancer-Cases and Reviews
ISSN : 2573-1610
Launched : 2016
JSM General Surgery Cases and Images
ISSN : 2573-1564
Launched : 2016
JSM Anatomy and Physiology
ISSN : 2573-1262
Launched : 2016
JSM Dental Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1548
Launched : 2016
Annals of Emergency Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1017
Launched : 2016
Annals of Mens Health and Wellness
ISSN : 2641-7707
Launched : 2017
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Health Care
ISSN : 2576-0084
Launched : 2018
Journal of Chronic Diseases and Management
ISSN : 2573-1300
Launched : 2016
Annals of Vaccines and Immunization
ISSN : 2378-9379
Launched : 2014
JSM Heart Surgery Cases and Images
ISSN : 2578-3157
Launched : 2016
Annals of Reproductive Medicine and Treatment
ISSN : 2573-1092
Launched : 2016
JSM Brain Science
ISSN : 2573-1289
Launched : 2016
JSM Biomarkers
ISSN : 2578-3815
Launched : 2014
JSM Biology
ISSN : 2475-9392
Launched : 2016
Archives of Stem Cell and Research
ISSN : 2578-3580
Launched : 2014
Annals of Clinical and Medical Microbiology
ISSN : 2578-3629
Launched : 2014
JSM Pediatric Surgery
ISSN : 2578-3149
Launched : 2017
Journal of Memory Disorder and Rehabilitation
ISSN : 2578-319X
Launched : 2016
JSM Tropical Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2578-3165
Launched : 2016
JSM Head and Face Medicine
ISSN : 2578-3793
Launched : 2016
JSM Cardiothoracic Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1297
Launched : 2016
JSM Bone and Joint Diseases
ISSN : 2578-3351
Launched : 2017
JSM Bioavailability and Bioequivalence
ISSN : 2641-7812
Launched : 2017
JSM Atherosclerosis
ISSN : 2573-1270
Launched : 2016
Journal of Genitourinary Disorders
ISSN : 2641-7790
Launched : 2017
Journal of Fractures and Sprains
ISSN : 2578-3831
Launched : 2016
Journal of Autism and Epilepsy
ISSN : 2641-7774
Launched : 2016
Annals of Marine Biology and Research
ISSN : 2573-105X
Launched : 2014
JSM Health Education & Primary Health Care
ISSN : 2578-3777
Launched : 2016
JSM Communication Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3807
Launched : 2016
Annals of Musculoskeletal Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3599
Launched : 2016
Annals of Virology and Research
ISSN : 2573-1122
Launched : 2014
JSM Renal Medicine
ISSN : 2573-1637
Launched : 2016
Journal of Muscle Health
ISSN : 2578-3823
Launched : 2016
JSM Genetics and Genomics
ISSN : 2334-1823
Launched : 2013
JSM Anxiety and Depression
ISSN : 2475-9139
Launched : 2016
Clinical Journal of Heart Diseases
ISSN : 2641-7766
Launched : 2016
Annals of Medicinal Chemistry and Research
ISSN : 2378-9336
Launched : 2014
JSM Pain and Management
ISSN : 2578-3378
Launched : 2016
JSM Women's Health
ISSN : 2578-3696
Launched : 2016
Clinical Research in HIV or AIDS
ISSN : 2374-0094
Launched : 2013
Journal of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Obesity
ISSN : 2333-6692
Launched : 2013
Journal of Substance Abuse and Alcoholism
ISSN : 2373-9363
Launched : 2013
JSM Neurosurgery and Spine
ISSN : 2373-9479
Launched : 2013
Journal of Liver and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2379-0830
Launched : 2014
Journal of Drug Design and Research
ISSN : 2379-089X
Launched : 2014
JSM Clinical Oncology and Research
ISSN : 2373-938X
Launched : 2013
JSM Bioinformatics, Genomics and Proteomics
ISSN : 2576-1102
Launched : 2014
JSM Chemistry
ISSN : 2334-1831
Launched : 2013
Journal of Trauma and Care
ISSN : 2573-1246
Launched : 2014
JSM Surgical Oncology and Research
ISSN : 2578-3688
Launched : 2016
Annals of Food Processing and Preservation
ISSN : 2573-1033
Launched : 2016
Journal of Radiology and Radiation Therapy
ISSN : 2333-7095
Launched : 2013
JSM Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
ISSN : 2578-3572
Launched : 2016
Annals of Clinical Pathology
ISSN : 2373-9282
Launched : 2013
Annals of Cardiovascular Diseases
ISSN : 2641-7731
Launched : 2016
Journal of Behavior
ISSN : 2576-0076
Launched : 2016
Annals of Clinical and Experimental Metabolism
ISSN : 2572-2492
Launched : 2016
Clinical Research in Infectious Diseases
ISSN : 2379-0636
Launched : 2013
JSM Microbiology
ISSN : 2333-6455
Launched : 2013
Journal of Urology and Research
ISSN : 2379-951X
Launched : 2014
Journal of Family Medicine and Community Health
ISSN : 2379-0547
Launched : 2013
Annals of Pregnancy and Care
ISSN : 2578-336X
Launched : 2017
JSM Cell and Developmental Biology
ISSN : 2379-061X
Launched : 2013
Annals of Aquaculture and Research
ISSN : 2379-0881
Launched : 2014
Clinical Research in Pulmonology
ISSN : 2333-6625
Launched : 2013
Journal of Immunology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2333-6714
Launched : 2013
Annals of Forensic Research and Analysis
ISSN : 2378-9476
Launched : 2014
JSM Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
ISSN : 2333-7109
Launched : 2013
Annals of Gerontology and Geriatric Research
ISSN : 2378-9409
Launched : 2014
Journal of Sleep Medicine and Disorders
ISSN : 2379-0822
Launched : 2014
JSM Burns and Trauma
ISSN : 2475-9406
Launched : 2016
Chemical Engineering and Process Techniques
ISSN : 2333-6633
Launched : 2013
Annals of Clinical Cytology and Pathology
ISSN : 2475-9430
Launched : 2014
JSM Allergy and Asthma
ISSN : 2573-1254
Launched : 2016
Journal of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
ISSN : 2334-2307
Launched : 2013
Annals of Sports Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2379-0571
Launched : 2014
JSM Sexual Medicine
ISSN : 2578-3718
Launched : 2016
Annals of Vascular Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2378-9344
Launched : 2014
JSM Biotechnology and Biomedical Engineering
ISSN : 2333-7117
Launched : 2013
Journal of Hematology and Transfusion
ISSN : 2333-6684
Launched : 2013
JSM Environmental Science and Ecology
ISSN : 2333-7141
Launched : 2013
Journal of Cardiology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2333-6676
Launched : 2013
JSM Nanotechnology and Nanomedicine
ISSN : 2334-1815
Launched : 2013
Journal of Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders
ISSN : 2475-9473
Launched : 2016
JSM Ophthalmology
ISSN : 2333-6447
Launched : 2013
Journal of Pharmacology and Clinical Toxicology
ISSN : 2333-7079
Launched : 2013
Annals of Psychiatry and Mental Health
ISSN : 2374-0124
Launched : 2013
Medical Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
ISSN : 2333-6439
Launched : 2013
Annals of Pediatrics and Child Health
ISSN : 2373-9312
Launched : 2013
JSM Clinical Pharmaceutics
ISSN : 2379-9498
Launched : 2014
JSM Foot and Ankle
ISSN : 2475-9112
Launched : 2016
JSM Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementia
ISSN : 2378-9565
Launched : 2014
Journal of Addiction Medicine and Therapy
ISSN : 2333-665X
Launched : 2013
Journal of Veterinary Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2378-931X
Launched : 2013
Annals of Public Health and Research
ISSN : 2378-9328
Launched : 2014
Annals of Orthopedics and Rheumatology
ISSN : 2373-9290
Launched : 2013
Journal of Clinical Nephrology and Research
ISSN : 2379-0652
Launched : 2014
Annals of Community Medicine and Practice
ISSN : 2475-9465
Launched : 2014
Annals of Biometrics and Biostatistics
ISSN : 2374-0116
Launched : 2013
JSM Clinical Case Reports
ISSN : 2373-9819
Launched : 2013
Journal of Cancer Biology and Research
ISSN : 2373-9436
Launched : 2013
Journal of Surgery and Transplantation Science
ISSN : 2379-0911
Launched : 2013
Journal of Dermatology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2373-9371
Launched : 2013
JSM Gastroenterology and Hepatology
ISSN : 2373-9487
Launched : 2013
Annals of Nursing and Practice
ISSN : 2379-9501
Launched : 2014
JSM Dentistry
ISSN : 2333-7133
Launched : 2013
Author Information X