Loading

Annals of Community Medicine and Practice

Basic Life Support: Knowledge and Attitude of Medical Students

Research Article | Open Access

  • 1. Department of Internal Medicine, Allama Iqbal Medical College, Pakistan
  • 2. Department of Internal Medicine, King Edward Medical University, Pakistan
  • 3. Department of Internal Medicine, Punjab Medical College, Pakistan
  • 4. Department of Internal Medicine, Baqai Medical University, Pakistan
  • 5. Department of Internal Medicine, Army Medical College, Pakistan
+ Show More - Show Less
Corresponding Authors
Malik Qistas Ahmad, Department of Internal Medicine, King Edward Medical University, Pakistan, Tel: +1-520-895-8400.
Abstract

Background: Basic life support (BLS) is defined as medical procedures and skills that can be utilized in case of emergency to save lives. It is a key component of chain of survival, decreases the cardiac arrest, CPR interval, and increases the rate of hospital discharge. CPR is a part of emergency medical care. Timely provision of Basic Life Support (BLS) saves life.

Objective: The objective of our study is:

• To assess BLS knowledge of students of Allama Iqbal Medical College, Pakistan

• To assess attitude of students of Allama Iqbal Medical College, Pakistan regarding BLS

Study design: It is a cross sectional study.

Study setting: Allama Iqbal Medical College, Pakistan.

Duration: Three months (April-June), 2016.

Inclusion criteria: All medical students, both hostilities and day scholars of Allama Iqbal Medical College from first year to final year Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery (MBBS), including both genders.

Data collection and analysis: An informed consent was taken and got signed from 300 medical undergraduate students on assurance of confidentiality. The following parameters were noted through a constructed questionnaire of all medical students included in the study; personal and socio demographic data such as age, sex, class, knowledge, attitude, level of training and previous exposure to Basic Life Support (BLS).

Results: The mean age of the respondents was 20.5700 with Standard deviation (SD) of 1.52. Out of the 300 study subjects, 243 students (81%) have heard about BLS while 57 students (19%) haven’t heard about BLS ( Graph no: 3). 239 students (79.67%) have the idea regarding correct abbreviation of BLS while others have no idea ( Graph no: 4). 94.3% students think BLS knowledge is useful for daily life incidents, and 20.3% don’t think so. 44.3% students have seen BLS done on some patients and 9.6% have not seen it. 13.4% students have also performed BLS on some patient and 2.9% have not performed (Table no: 2).

Conclusions: Knowledge about BLS needs to be improved and conferences, seminars must be organized to increase awareness about BLS.

Citation

Sohail CS, Ahmad MQ, Nadeem F, Jahngir MU, Khalil MJ, et al. (2018) Basic Life Support: Knowledge and Attitude of Medical Students. Ann Community Med Pract 4(2): 1034.

Keywords
  • Basic life support
  • knowledge
  • Attitude
  • Undergraduates
  • Training
  • Survival
ABBREVIATIONS

BLS: Basic Life Support; MBBS: Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery; CPR: Cardio Pulmonary Resuscitation; SD: Standard Deviation

INTRODUCTION

Basic life support is defined as medical procedures and skills that can be utilized in case of emergency to save lives [1]. It is a key component of chain of survival; decreases the arrest, and increases the rate of hospital discharge [2]. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation is a part of emergency medical care [3]. Timely provision of BLS saves life. CPR invented in 1960 is a simple but effective procedure that allows almost anyone to sustain life in early critical minutes after cardiac and respiratory arrest. In 1966, the American Heart Association developed the first CPR guidelines which have been followed by regular updates [4]. Knowledge of BLS is an absolute necessity for all medical professionals to face acute medical emergencies [1]. BLS includes recognition of signs of sudden cardiac arrest, heart attack, stroke, foreign body airway obstruction, and automated external defibrillator [5]. BLS procedures include CPR, bleeding control, artificial ventilation and basic airway management [6]. One of the objectives at graduation as stated in blueprint version 2009 is proficiency in BLS [7].

According to study given in world journal of emergency medicine, when the participants are inquired about resuscitation training during graduation, 83(69%) of them had no training at all and 27(22%) had received some training within last 5 years. 28(23%) of participants had not been involved in patient resuscitation [2].

According to another study among medical students at Ziauddin University Karachi, Pakistan, 34(27%) trained and 28(22.4%) untrained students could tell that they have to put a patient with convulsion in recovery position to avoid any aspiration and tongue rolling. 38(30.4%) of both trained and untrained expressed that they would give plenty of water to a patient who has accidently ingested acid. Maximum number of correct answer for trained students was 11 and minimum 4 with the mean of 6.13 + 2.1 questions [8].In Saudi Arabia, a study was carried out and it was stated that no student had completed 10% knowledge in BLS among respondents. Only 2 out of 144 students (1.38%) had secured 70-79%. 10 out of 144 responders (6.94%) had secured 60-69%. 35 of 144 (24.30%) secured 50-59%. 97 responders (67.36%) had secured less than 50%. The mean score was 39.7% showing overall poor knowledge of medical students about BLS [6]. In a Study by Harsha Kumar in India, majority (84.6%) of the students had heard of the fact, 37.8% felt that CPR should be administered to unconscious person with normal palpable pulses and respiration, and 39.5 % only knew the fact the correct order for performing CPR. Students had adequate overall understanding about the response to a situation where CPR is needed [3]. Health professionals should have sound CPR knowledge and skills but there is major problem with retention of skills and outdated information. Average health personnel in our centre lack adequate knowledge in CPR which should be addressed promptly. CPR should be a core competency across our health care professional programs. Poor awareness among medical students about basic life support is a matter of great concern. The presence of trained rescuer is a key determinant of ultimate life saving skills that is to take right decision to foster these skills for medical students which can be reinforced in succeeding years [9]. However, BLS and resuscitation training is not routinely practiced in low income countries like Pakistan, and there is still no standard of care regarding emergency situations. Hence, in Pakistani scenario, doctors working in casualties of private sector and government sector hospitals will handle most of the emergencies. We carried out this study with the aim to assess the knowledge, awareness, and attitude of students of Allama Iqbal Medical College, Pakistan towards BLS and devise necessary recommendations about the lack of BLS knowledge.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study design

   •  Cross sectional study

Study setting

Study was done at Allama Iqbal Medical College, Allama Shabir Ahmad Usmani Rd Lahore, Pakistan. The Institutional Ethical Committee of Allama Iqbal Medical College gave the ethical clearance.

Duration of study

   •  Three months

Sample size

   300 students of AIMC Lahore

Sampling technique

   •  Non probability / purposive sampling

Sample selection

Inclusion criteria: Sample was collected from all undergraduate medical students, both the hostilities and day scholars of Allama Iqbal Medical College, from first year MBBS to final year MBBS, including both genders. We included the first and second year students to assess their awareness about BLS/ CPR skills along with the students from clinical years (3rd, 4th, final). 

Exclusion criteria: All debarred students in 1st to Final year MBBS were not included. Similarly interns, nursing faculties and dentistry students were excluded.

Data collection and analysis procedure

Informed consent was taken from those willing to participate and got signed from 300 medical students on assurance of confidentiality. After recruiting the study subjects on the basis of above mentioned criteria, we explained the purpose of study to each and every individual. The following parameters were noted through a self prepared 20-questioned based questionnaire of all medical students included in the study; personal and socio demographic data such as age, sex, class, knowledge, attitude, level of training, and previous exposure to Basic Life Support. A pilot study was conducted to assess the questionnaire, taking the help from Community Medicine Department faculty, who accordingly made the needed corrections. The statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS software version 20.0.

RESULTS

After collecting data, the values were statistically analyzed and tabulated. The results with P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Three hundred students (300) were included in the research. Of them, 184 (61.33%) were female and 116 (38.67%) were male of different study years (Figure 1).

Two hundred & forty three (81%) students have heard about BLS (Figure 2,3). Out of those, 129 (76.8%) were from pre clinical years (Figure 2), male were 58 (72.5%) and female were 71 (79.8%). 114 (87.0%) were from clinical years (Figure 2), male 29 (89.5%) and female were 85 (89.5%). 239 students (98.3%) had the idea regarding correct abbreviation of BLS while others have no idea (Figure 4).

Twenty seven (16 ) pre clinical years’ students had done BLS on some patients, male were 25 (31.3%) and female were 2 (2.2%); thirteen (9.9%) clinical years students have done BLS on some patient, male were 8 (22.2%) female were 5 (5.3%) (Table 1).

Forty one (24.3%) pre clinical years students had attended workshops on BLS, male were 23 (28.8%) and female were 18(20.2%). Sixteen clinical years students had attend workshops, male were 6 (16.7%) and female were 10 (10.5%) (Table 2,3).

One hundred & fifty seven (92.9%) pre clinical students thought BLS as useful , male were 73 (91.3%) and female were 84 (94.4.%). One hundred & twenty four clinical years students thought BLS useful, male 33 (91.7%) and female 91 (95.8%) (Table 2,3).

More females (85.2%) have had heard and knew about BLS as compared to males (75.7%) while more males among those who had heard about BLS have attended workshops (25.2%) and had performed BLS on various patients (28.7%) (Table 4-8).

DISCUSSION

Medical students should have sound BLS knowledge and skills but there is a major problem in their knowledge and attitude towards BLS. This study was done to explore the present knowledge of medical students of Allama Iqbal Medical College about BLS/ CPR so as to make a plan for BLS training. The present study being a unique study analyzed the knowledge, awareness and attitude towards BLS among medical students.

Our study revealed that majority of the students (36.67%) had poor knowledge and insight about BLS while 31.33% were in average range and only 1% had excellent knowledge about BLS. Similar results were reported by Pandey S et al., and Chandraskar S et al., that students had an inadequate and poor knowledge about BLS [9,10].

According to our study, 76.3% of the students from pre-clinical, while 87% from clinical years had knowledge about BLS. A study done by Asad Abbas et al., at Zia Uddin University Karachi had similar results that 83.2% trained and 60% untrained responded correctly about BLS. It revealed the fact that as the students progressed in clinical years they have had more knowledge about BLS [8].

It was found that 27% of the students had an idea that BLS should be done in hospital settings only, while other 73% preferred BLS to be done in an emergency situation at the spot without waiting for the hospital setup. A study by Sharma R and Attar N in Mangalore had the same result that only 13% of the medical professionals demand proper hospital settings for BLS while 87% of them had an idea that BLS can be done both within and outside the hospital setup [1].

Our study results revealed that only 12.2% had attended BLS workshops and among them males were more active in such activities as compared to female students. Roshana S et al., found the similar result that 69% students had no training at all about BLS [2]. Only a few students had actually done BLS on patients which showed their poor attitude towards BLS.

According to 52.33% medical students, the main reason for lack of knowledge about BLS was no professional training available in the colleges. A study conducted by Afzali moghaddam M et al., in Tehran, Iran had the same finding that BLS training could significantly increase the knowledge of medical students [11]. Majority of the students felt the need to include the BLS training in medical curriculum.

Our study has certain limitations; practical skills of BLS/ CPR couldn’t be elicited among medical undergraduates. Similarly, our study doesn’t provide any idea about the awareness and attitude of BLS skills among graduates, nursing faculties and interns.

Table 1: Gender of respondents * BLS done on patient * Class of respondent Cross tabulation.

Class of respondent  BLS done on patient Total
  Yes   No
Preclinical (I - III Yr) Gender of respondent   Male   25   55   80
31.3% 68.8% 100.0%
    Female   2   87   89
2.2% 97.8% 100.0%
                   Total   27  142  169
16.0% 84.0% 100.0%
Clinical (IV & V Yr) Gender of respondent   Male   8   28  36
22.2% 77.8% 100.0%
    Female   5   90   95
5.3% 94.7% 100.0%
                  Total   13  118  131
9.9% 90.1% 100.0%

Table 2: Age of respondents.

Valid  300
Missing   0
Mean 20.5700
Median 21.0000
Mode 21.00
Std. Deviation 1.52079
Minimum  17.00
Maximum  24.00

Table 3: BLS Knowledge Frequencies.

  Responses Percentage of Cases
    N Percentage
Heard about BLS 243 17.6% 81.5%
Need to know BLS 270 19.5% 90.6%
BLS in medical curriculum 260 18.8% 87.2%
BLS in hospital setting  99 7.2% 33.2%
BLS being done is seen 132 9.6% 44.3%
BLS done on patient  40 2.9% 13.4%
BLS workshop attended  57 4.1% 19.1%
Usefulness of BLS 281 20.3% 94.3%
Total 1382 100.0% 463.8%
a. Dichotomy group tabulated at value 1.

Table 4: BLS Knowledge*Gender Cross tabulation

      Gender of respondent Total
       Male Female
  Heard about BLS         Count 87 156 243
   % within Gender 75.7% 85.2%  
  Need to know BLS         Count 99 171 270
   % within Gender 86.1% 93.4%  
       BLS in medical curriculum         Count 94 166 260
              % within Gender 81.7% 90.7%  
  BLS in hospital setting         Count 56 43 99
   % within Gender 48.7% 23.5  
  BLS being done is seen         Count 61 71  132
   % within Gender 53.0%  38.8%  
  BLS done on patient         Count 33  7 40
   % within Gender 28.7% 3.8%  
  BLS workshop attended         Count 29 28 57
   % within Gender 25.2% 15.3%  
  Usefulness of BLS         Count 106 175 281
   % within Gender 92.2% 95.6%  
                   Total   115 183 298
Heard about BLS
Chi-Square Tests
  Value   df   Asymptotic Significance (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 198.693a   2           .000
Likelihood Ratio 248.548   2           .000
Linear-by-Linear Association 2.524   1           .112
N of Valid Cases 298    
a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 21.41.
Need to know about BLS
                                                   Chi-Square Tests
  Value   df   Asymptotic Significance (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 233.601a   2           .000
Likelihood Ratio 287.638   2           .000
Linear-by-Linear Association 48.068   1           .000
N of Valid Cases 298    
a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 10.90.
BLS in medical curriculum
                                                    Chi-Square Tests
  Value   df   Asymptotic Significance (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 217.725a   2           .000
Likelihood Ratio 268.509   2           .000
Linear-by-Linear Association 21.781   1           .000
N of Valid Cases 298    
a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 14.79.
BLS in hospital setting
                                                   Chi-Square Tests
  Value   df   Asymptotic Significance (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 232.601a   2           .000
Likelihood Ratio 282.229   2           .000
Linear-by-Linear Association 196.653   1           .000
N of Valid Cases   298    
a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 16.74.
BLS is seen
                                                    Chi-Square Tests
  Value   df   Asymptotic Significance (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 245.865a   2           .000
Likelihood Ratio 322.605   2           .000
Linear-by-Linear Association 171.576   1           .000
N of Valid Cases   298    
a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 23.74.
BLS done
                                                   Chi-Square Tests
  Value   df   Asymptotic Significance (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 72.489a   2           .000
Likelihood Ratio 85.579   2           .000
Linear-by-Linear Association 64.460   1           .000
N of Valid Cases   298    
a. 2 cells (33.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.72.
Workshop attended
                                                   Chi-Square Tests
  Value   df   Asymptotic Significance (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 110.583a   2           .000
Likelihood Ratio 130.112   2           .000
Linear-by-Linear Association 96.764   1           .000
N of Valid Cases   298    
a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 10.90.
Usefulness of BLS
                                                   Chi-Square Tests
  Value   df   Asymptotic Significance (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 258.340a   2           .000
Likelihood Ratio 321.715   2           .000
Linear-by-Linear Association 102.748   1           .000
N of Valid Cases 298    
a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 6.62.

Table 5: Gender of respondent * Heard about BLS * Class of respondent Cross tabulation.

Gender of respondent * Heard about BLS * Class of respondent Cross tabulation Heard about BLS  Total
  Yes   No
Preclinical (I - III Yrs.) Gender of respondent    Male   58   22   80
72.5% 27.5% 100.0%
     Female  71   18   89
79.8% 20.2% 100.0%
                   Total   129  40  169
76.3% 23.7% 100.0%
Clinical (IV & V Yrs.) Gender of respondent    Male   29   7   36
80.6% 19.4% 100.0%
     Female   85   10   95
89.5% 10.5% 100.0%
                  Total   13  118  131
87.0% 13.0% 100.0%

Table 6: Gender of respondent * BLS in medical curriculum * Class of respondent Cross tabulation

                        Class of respondent BLS in medical curriculum  Total
  Yes   No
Preclinical (I - III Yrs.) Gender of respondent   Male    61    19   80
76.3% 23.8% 100.0%
    Female   81     8   89
91.0% 9.0% 100.0%
                   Total   142   27  169
84.0% 16.0% 100.0%

Table 7: Gender of respondent * Need to know BLS * Class of respondent Cross tabulation

                            Class of respondent Need to know BLS  Total
  Yes   No
Preclinical (I - III Yrs.) Gender of respondent   Male    65    15   80
81.3% 18.8% 100.0%
    Female   80    9   89
89.9% 10.1% 100.0%
                   Total   145   24  169
85.8% 14.2% 100.0%
Clinical (IV & V Yrs.) Gender of respondent   Male   34    2   36
94.4%  5.6% 100.0%
    Female   91    4   95
95.8%  4.2% 100.0%
                  Total   125    6  131
95.4%  4.6% 100.0%

Table 8: Gender of respondent * BLS in hospital setting * Class of respondents Cross tabulation

                            Class of respondent Need to know BLS  Total
  Yes   No
Preclinical (I - III Yrs.) Gender of respondent   Male   43   37   80
53.8% 46.3% 100.0%
    Female   24   65   89
27.0% 73.0% 100.0%
                   Total   67  102  169
39.6% 60.4% 100.0%
Clinical (IV & V Yrs.) Gender of respondent   Male   13   23   36
36.1%  63.9% 100.0%
    Female   19   76   95
20.0%  80.0% 100.0%
                  Total   32   99  131
24.4%  75.6% 100.0%
Questionnaire
After receiving the answers from the survey, we analyzed the conclusions. We excluded the incomplete responses. We described our results as %. 

 

Parameters Q1-18  Questions

Awareness and attitude towards BLS
Knowledge about BLS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Knowledge of individual components of BLS

Q1
Q2
Q3    

Q4    

 

 

Q5

 

Q6

 

Q7

 

Q8

 

Q9

 

Q10

 

Q11

 

Q12

 

Q13

 

Q14

 

Q15

 

Q16

 

Q17

 

Q18   

Able to understand the meaning of BLS
Understand the need to know about BLS
Recommend BLS to be a part of coursework.
Knowledge about Settings where BLS can be performed
a. In hospitals only
b. Both in hospital and outside hospitals
Observed demonstration of BLS
a. Yes
b. No
Ever performed BLS by yourself
a. Yes
b. No
Have you ever attended any BLS workshops in past?
a. Yes
b. No
Knowledge about External Cardiac massage per minute 
a. Knows
b. Does not know
Knowledge about ratio of cardiac compressions to breaths delivered during BLS
a. Know
b. Does not know
Do you have the knowledge of location of chest compressions during BLS?
a. Yes
b. No
Knowledge of sequence of performance of BLS
a. Correct sequence 
b. Wrong sequence
Do you have the knowledge of depth of compression in adults in CPR
a. Yes
b. No
If you do not want to give mouth to mouth CPR, what else can be done?
Do you know the medical emergency contact number in your setup? 
 a. Yes 
 b. No
For how long pulse rates of victim should be checked?
In “ABCD” of BLS, does “D” denote Defibrillation?
a. Yes 
b. No
Self-assessment reasons for lack of BLS knowledge and awareness
a. Non availability of professional training
b. Lack of interest 
c. Busy coursework
d. Different combinations of above 3
Self-grading of knowledge of BLS
a. Poor
b. Below average
c. Good 
d. Excellent
BLS= Basic Life Support, CPR= Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

 

CONCLUSION

We concluded that awareness and knowledge of Basic Life Support (BLS) among medical students is very poor and needs to be improved. Performing BLS and attending BLS workshops plays a vital role in attaining BLS knowledge by medical students and health professionals. By regular introduction of BLS in academic curriculum and organizing clinical workshops, health care professionals should be made well versed with these life saving maneuvers.

REFERENCES

1. Sharma R, Attar N. Adult BLS awareness and knowledge among medical and dental interns. J Health Sci. 2012; 2: 6-13.

2. Roshana S, Batajoo K, Piryani R, Sharma M. Basic life support: knowledge and attitude of medical professional. World J Emerg Med. 2012; 3: 141-145.

3. Kumar H, Upadya H, Ashok S, Chowdari A, Niranjan G. Study on awareness and perception about basic life support among undergraduate medical students. Int J. 2013; 3: 146-150. 

4. Reddy S, Doshi D, Reddy P, Kulkarini S. Awareness of BLS among staff and students in dental school. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2013; 14: 511- 517.

5. Chaudary A, Parikh H, Dave V. Knowledge of basic life support in medical college. Natl J Med Res. 2011; 1: 80-84.

6. Alanazi A, Alsalemah M, Alsomali O, Almurphdi, Alabdali A, Maher Al-Sulami, et al. Poor basic life support awareness. Middle East J Sci Res. 2014; 21: 848-854.

7. Rujiter P, Biersteker H, Biest J, Goor H, Tan E. Retention of first aid and basic life support skills in undergraduate medical students. Med Edu Online. 2014; 19: 10-34.

8. Abbas A, Bukhari I, Ahmad F. Knowledge of First aid and basic life support amongst medical students: a comparison between trained and untrained students. J Pak Med Assoc. 2011; 61: 613-616.

9. Pandey S, Parate V, Pandey S, Sukhsohale N. Evaluation of retention of knowledge and skills imparted to medical students through BLS training. Adv Physiol Edu. 2014; 38: 42-45.

10. Chandrasekaran S, Kumar S, Bhat S, Shabbir P, Kumar V. Awareness of BLS among medical, dental, nursing students and doctors. Indian J Anesth. 2010; 54: 121-126.

11. Afzalimoghaddam B, Talebideloi M, Talebian M, Farahmand S. Evaluation of the effectiveness of BLS training on the knowledge and skills. Patient saf qual improve j. 2014; 2: 73-76.

12. Josipovac P, Webb M, Grath I. Basic life support knowledge of undergraduate nursing and chiropractic students. Aust J Adv Nurs. 2010; 26: 58-63.

13. Lesnik D, Lesnik B, Golab J, Kanizmaric M, Mally S, Grmec S. Impact of additional module training on the level of basic life support knowledge of first year students at the university of maribor. Int J Emerg Med. 2011; 4: 16.

14. Altintas K, yildiz A, Aslan D, Bilir N, Ozvans S. First aid and BLS training for first year medical students. Eur J Emerg Med. 2009; 16: 336-338.

15. Sudeep B, Sefueira P, Jain J, Maliyil M. Awareness of BLS among students and teaching faculty. Int Dent J Studn Research. 2013; 2: 4-9.

16. Mahling M, Munch A, Schenk S, Volkert S, Rein A, Teichner U, et al. Basic life support is effectively taught in groups of three, five and eight medical students: a prospective, randomized study. BMC Med Educ. 2014; 14: 215-222.

17. Mani G, Annaduri K, Danasekran R, Ramasamy J. A cross sectional study to assess knowledge and attitude related to BLS among undergraduate medical students in Tamil Nadu, India. Prog Health Sci. 2014; 4: 47-52.

18. Khan A, Shaikh S, Shuaib F, Sattar A, Samani SA, Shabbir Q, et al. Knowledge and practice of undergraduate students regarding first aid measures. J Pak Med Assoc. 2010; 60: 68-72.

Sohail CS, Ahmad MQ, Nadeem F, Jahngir MU, Khalil MJ, et al. (2018) Basic Life Support: Knowledge and Attitude of Medical Students. Ann Community Med Pract 4(2): 1034.

Received : 13 Jun 2018
Accepted : 26 Jun 2018
Published : 28 Jun 2018
Journals
Annals of Otolaryngology and Rhinology
ISSN : 2379-948X
Launched : 2014
JSM Schizophrenia
Launched : 2016
Journal of Nausea
Launched : 2020
JSM Internal Medicine
Launched : 2016
JSM Hepatitis
Launched : 2016
JSM Oro Facial Surgeries
ISSN : 2578-3211
Launched : 2016
Journal of Human Nutrition and Food Science
ISSN : 2333-6706
Launched : 2013
JSM Regenerative Medicine and Bioengineering
ISSN : 2379-0490
Launched : 2013
JSM Spine
ISSN : 2578-3181
Launched : 2016
Archives of Palliative Care
ISSN : 2573-1165
Launched : 2016
JSM Nutritional Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3203
Launched : 2017
Annals of Neurodegenerative Disorders
ISSN : 2476-2032
Launched : 2016
Journal of Fever
ISSN : 2641-7782
Launched : 2017
JSM Bone Marrow Research
ISSN : 2578-3351
Launched : 2016
JSM Mathematics and Statistics
ISSN : 2578-3173
Launched : 2014
Journal of Autoimmunity and Research
ISSN : 2573-1173
Launched : 2014
JSM Arthritis
ISSN : 2475-9155
Launched : 2016
JSM Head and Neck Cancer-Cases and Reviews
ISSN : 2573-1610
Launched : 2016
JSM General Surgery Cases and Images
ISSN : 2573-1564
Launched : 2016
JSM Anatomy and Physiology
ISSN : 2573-1262
Launched : 2016
JSM Dental Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1548
Launched : 2016
Annals of Emergency Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1017
Launched : 2016
Annals of Mens Health and Wellness
ISSN : 2641-7707
Launched : 2017
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Health Care
ISSN : 2576-0084
Launched : 2018
Journal of Chronic Diseases and Management
ISSN : 2573-1300
Launched : 2016
Annals of Vaccines and Immunization
ISSN : 2378-9379
Launched : 2014
JSM Heart Surgery Cases and Images
ISSN : 2578-3157
Launched : 2016
Annals of Reproductive Medicine and Treatment
ISSN : 2573-1092
Launched : 2016
JSM Brain Science
ISSN : 2573-1289
Launched : 2016
JSM Biomarkers
ISSN : 2578-3815
Launched : 2014
JSM Biology
ISSN : 2475-9392
Launched : 2016
Archives of Stem Cell and Research
ISSN : 2578-3580
Launched : 2014
Annals of Clinical and Medical Microbiology
ISSN : 2578-3629
Launched : 2014
JSM Pediatric Surgery
ISSN : 2578-3149
Launched : 2017
Journal of Memory Disorder and Rehabilitation
ISSN : 2578-319X
Launched : 2016
JSM Tropical Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2578-3165
Launched : 2016
JSM Head and Face Medicine
ISSN : 2578-3793
Launched : 2016
JSM Cardiothoracic Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1297
Launched : 2016
JSM Bone and Joint Diseases
ISSN : 2578-3351
Launched : 2017
JSM Bioavailability and Bioequivalence
ISSN : 2641-7812
Launched : 2017
JSM Atherosclerosis
ISSN : 2573-1270
Launched : 2016
Journal of Genitourinary Disorders
ISSN : 2641-7790
Launched : 2017
Journal of Fractures and Sprains
ISSN : 2578-3831
Launched : 2016
Journal of Autism and Epilepsy
ISSN : 2641-7774
Launched : 2016
Annals of Marine Biology and Research
ISSN : 2573-105X
Launched : 2014
JSM Health Education & Primary Health Care
ISSN : 2578-3777
Launched : 2016
JSM Communication Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3807
Launched : 2016
Annals of Musculoskeletal Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3599
Launched : 2016
Annals of Virology and Research
ISSN : 2573-1122
Launched : 2014
JSM Renal Medicine
ISSN : 2573-1637
Launched : 2016
Journal of Muscle Health
ISSN : 2578-3823
Launched : 2016
JSM Genetics and Genomics
ISSN : 2334-1823
Launched : 2013
JSM Anxiety and Depression
ISSN : 2475-9139
Launched : 2016
Clinical Journal of Heart Diseases
ISSN : 2641-7766
Launched : 2016
Annals of Medicinal Chemistry and Research
ISSN : 2378-9336
Launched : 2014
JSM Pain and Management
ISSN : 2578-3378
Launched : 2016
JSM Women's Health
ISSN : 2578-3696
Launched : 2016
Clinical Research in HIV or AIDS
ISSN : 2374-0094
Launched : 2013
Journal of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Obesity
ISSN : 2333-6692
Launched : 2013
Journal of Substance Abuse and Alcoholism
ISSN : 2373-9363
Launched : 2013
JSM Neurosurgery and Spine
ISSN : 2373-9479
Launched : 2013
Journal of Liver and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2379-0830
Launched : 2014
Journal of Drug Design and Research
ISSN : 2379-089X
Launched : 2014
JSM Clinical Oncology and Research
ISSN : 2373-938X
Launched : 2013
JSM Bioinformatics, Genomics and Proteomics
ISSN : 2576-1102
Launched : 2014
JSM Chemistry
ISSN : 2334-1831
Launched : 2013
Journal of Trauma and Care
ISSN : 2573-1246
Launched : 2014
JSM Surgical Oncology and Research
ISSN : 2578-3688
Launched : 2016
Annals of Food Processing and Preservation
ISSN : 2573-1033
Launched : 2016
Journal of Radiology and Radiation Therapy
ISSN : 2333-7095
Launched : 2013
JSM Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
ISSN : 2578-3572
Launched : 2016
Annals of Clinical Pathology
ISSN : 2373-9282
Launched : 2013
Annals of Cardiovascular Diseases
ISSN : 2641-7731
Launched : 2016
Journal of Behavior
ISSN : 2576-0076
Launched : 2016
Annals of Clinical and Experimental Metabolism
ISSN : 2572-2492
Launched : 2016
Clinical Research in Infectious Diseases
ISSN : 2379-0636
Launched : 2013
JSM Microbiology
ISSN : 2333-6455
Launched : 2013
Journal of Urology and Research
ISSN : 2379-951X
Launched : 2014
Journal of Family Medicine and Community Health
ISSN : 2379-0547
Launched : 2013
Annals of Pregnancy and Care
ISSN : 2578-336X
Launched : 2017
JSM Cell and Developmental Biology
ISSN : 2379-061X
Launched : 2013
Annals of Aquaculture and Research
ISSN : 2379-0881
Launched : 2014
Clinical Research in Pulmonology
ISSN : 2333-6625
Launched : 2013
Journal of Immunology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2333-6714
Launched : 2013
Annals of Forensic Research and Analysis
ISSN : 2378-9476
Launched : 2014
JSM Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
ISSN : 2333-7109
Launched : 2013
Annals of Breast Cancer Research
ISSN : 2641-7685
Launched : 2016
Annals of Gerontology and Geriatric Research
ISSN : 2378-9409
Launched : 2014
Journal of Sleep Medicine and Disorders
ISSN : 2379-0822
Launched : 2014
JSM Burns and Trauma
ISSN : 2475-9406
Launched : 2016
Chemical Engineering and Process Techniques
ISSN : 2333-6633
Launched : 2013
Annals of Clinical Cytology and Pathology
ISSN : 2475-9430
Launched : 2014
JSM Allergy and Asthma
ISSN : 2573-1254
Launched : 2016
Journal of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
ISSN : 2334-2307
Launched : 2013
Annals of Sports Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2379-0571
Launched : 2014
JSM Sexual Medicine
ISSN : 2578-3718
Launched : 2016
Annals of Vascular Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2378-9344
Launched : 2014
JSM Biotechnology and Biomedical Engineering
ISSN : 2333-7117
Launched : 2013
Journal of Hematology and Transfusion
ISSN : 2333-6684
Launched : 2013
JSM Environmental Science and Ecology
ISSN : 2333-7141
Launched : 2013
Journal of Cardiology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2333-6676
Launched : 2013
JSM Nanotechnology and Nanomedicine
ISSN : 2334-1815
Launched : 2013
Journal of Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders
ISSN : 2475-9473
Launched : 2016
JSM Ophthalmology
ISSN : 2333-6447
Launched : 2013
Journal of Pharmacology and Clinical Toxicology
ISSN : 2333-7079
Launched : 2013
Annals of Psychiatry and Mental Health
ISSN : 2374-0124
Launched : 2013
Medical Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
ISSN : 2333-6439
Launched : 2013
Annals of Pediatrics and Child Health
ISSN : 2373-9312
Launched : 2013
JSM Clinical Pharmaceutics
ISSN : 2379-9498
Launched : 2014
JSM Foot and Ankle
ISSN : 2475-9112
Launched : 2016
JSM Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementia
ISSN : 2378-9565
Launched : 2014
Journal of Addiction Medicine and Therapy
ISSN : 2333-665X
Launched : 2013
Journal of Veterinary Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2378-931X
Launched : 2013
Annals of Public Health and Research
ISSN : 2378-9328
Launched : 2014
Annals of Orthopedics and Rheumatology
ISSN : 2373-9290
Launched : 2013
Journal of Clinical Nephrology and Research
ISSN : 2379-0652
Launched : 2014
Annals of Biometrics and Biostatistics
ISSN : 2374-0116
Launched : 2013
JSM Clinical Case Reports
ISSN : 2373-9819
Launched : 2013
Journal of Cancer Biology and Research
ISSN : 2373-9436
Launched : 2013
Journal of Surgery and Transplantation Science
ISSN : 2379-0911
Launched : 2013
Journal of Dermatology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2373-9371
Launched : 2013
JSM Gastroenterology and Hepatology
ISSN : 2373-9487
Launched : 2013
Annals of Nursing and Practice
ISSN : 2379-9501
Launched : 2014
JSM Dentistry
ISSN : 2333-7133
Launched : 2013
Author Information X