Annals of Pediatrics and Child Health

Do Parents or Guardians of Pediatric Patients With Acute Cough Consider Quality of Life (QOL) Questions Important, and Do Providers Ask Them?

Research Article | Open Access

  • 1. Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, USA
  • 2. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of New Mexico, Mexico
+ Show More - Show Less
Corresponding Authors
Iluonose Amoni, Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota Masonic Children’s Hospital, Academic Office Building, 2450 Riverside Avenue South AO- 301, Minneapolis, MN 55454, USA, Tel: 612-625-6678; Fax number: 612-626-1144

Amoni IN, Fullerton L, Sapien RE. Do Parents or Guardians of Pediatric Patients With Acute Cough Consider Quality of Life (QOL) Questions Important, and Do Providers Ask Them? Ann Pediatr Child Health 2023; 11(1): 1296.


Cough is one of the most common complaints for pediatric patients presenting to a medical provider [1,2]. It is estimated that there are approximately 75-100 million physician visits annually for the common cold, 22-189 million missed school days annually due to cold or cough, and 126 million missed workdays for parents staying home to care for their child with a cough [3].

Cough can be classified as acute or chronic, with acute cough defined as a cough lasting less than 3-4 weeks. Acute cough occurs most frequently secondary to upper respiratory illnesses. Cough can be a disturbing symptom and have a considerable impact on the quality of life (QOL) of patients and their families/caregivers [3,4]. Quality of life (QOL) indicators include poor sleep, missed school days, missed workdays, lost wages for the family, stress, poor coping strategies, and illness anxiety [3,4].

Several studies have documented the impact of cough on the QOL of patients and their families, especially chronic cough [4-6].There are multiple specific chronic cough validated questionnaires [7-11]. Few studies exist on the impact of acute cough on QOL, and there are few acute cough specific validated QOL questionnaires available [12].

Treatment for acute cough is largely supportive. This leaves providers with little to offer families of children presenting with acute cough except home remedies, supportive care, and empathy. Studies have shown that effective communication and physician empathy are associated with increased parental satisfaction with doctor visits and increased adherence to treatment recommendations [13-18].Physician empathy may be expressed by asking QOL questions.

The purpose of this study was to determine the importance parents and other caregivers place on whether questions about QOL indicators are asked during an emergency department encounter for acute cough, and to evaluate if this was associated with increased parent satisfaction.

Study hypotheses

Hypothesis 1: Parents and guardians of pediatric patients with acute cough will rate the importance of QOL questions differently than pediatric emergency department, emergency department, and urgent care providers.

Hypothesis 2: There will be a relationship between parents’ or guardians’ satisfaction with the emergency or urgent care visit for their child with acute cough and being asked quality of life questions.

This study’s secondary objective was to determine how frequently parents or guardians report being asked QOL questions when they present to an emergency department with a patient experiencing acute cough.



Study Design

This cross-sectional study used two survey instruments: one for parents or guardians (henceforth referred to as caregivers) of pediatric patients presenting to an urban pediatric emergency department (ED) with acute cough and the other for pediatric ED and urgent care providers.

Selection Criteria

Caregivers: We included caregivers of children ages 1 month to 18 years with a cough lasting 3 weeks or less who presented to the XXXXXXXXXX XX XXX XXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX between September 2018 and February 2019.

We excluded caregivers of pediatric patients with comorbid conditions (pulmonary and cardiac pathologies such as asthma), patients being admitted, patients in extremis and potential participants who did not speak English or Spanish.

Providers: We included providers in Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Urgent Care or Emergency Medicine. These providers were anonymously recruited through the Pediatric Emergency Medicine online listserv and emails to professional groups such as American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP).

Survey Development

Surveys were pilot tested to establish face validity and to ensure readability and adequate understanding. Fifteen caregivers and 19 physicians participated in the pilot phase of the study. The surveys were revised based on feedback provided by these participants. Pilot data were not included in the final sample.

The parent and guardian survey (henceforth referred to as the caregiver survey) consisted of 19 questions. The provider survey (henceforth referred to as the physician survey) was a 23-question survey.

The caregiver survey began with demographic questions about caregiver gender, relationship to the patient, patient age, number of children living at home and satisfaction with their current visit. Satisfaction was measured as 1= “not at all satisfied,” 2= “slightly satisfied,” 3= “satisfied,” 4= “very satisfied,” and 5= “extremely satisfied.” The next set of questions on the caregiver survey were binary asking whether they were asked seven specific QOL questions during the current visit. The final set of questions used a 5-point Likert scale to measure the importance caregivers placed on being asked these seven QOL questions by providers. The scale was coded as follows: 1= “not at all important,” 2= “not very important,” 3= “somewhat important,” 4= “important,” and 5= “very important.” A final question used the same scale as a general measure of the importance of asking these quality-of-life questions.

The physician survey included demographic measures such as age, gender, if they had children or were caring for other children at home, their area of training, level of training, usual practice setting and length of time in practice. The next sections of the physician survey were designed to parallel the caregiver survey as closely as possible. Physicians were asked how often they asked caregivers the seven specific QOL questions that were included on the caregiver survey and provided a 5-point Likert scale where 1= “never,” 2= “rarely,” 3= “occasionally,” 4= “frequently,” and 5= “very frequently.” The final section queried physicians on “how important is it to you to ask the caregiver” the same seven QOL questions and the 5-point Likert scale was the same importance scale used for the caregiver survey. The final question in the physician survey was essentially the same as for the caregiver survey.

Study Procedure

Pediatric patients presenting with cough symptoms were identified by monitoring the electronic patient tracking board at the XXXXXXXXXX XX XXX XXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XX. A checklist was used to ensure eligibility for study participation. Verbal consent for participation was obtained from caregivers and consent confirmed by paper consent given to participants. Questions were then administered by the lead author or trained research assistants. Answers were entered into a password-protected online database (REDCaP) [20], using iPads or laptop computers.

The physician surveys were distributed using the online distribution networks listed above with an introductory email describing the study and survey as well as providing a link to the online survey in REDCaP [19]. Participants were informed that completing the survey implied consent.

No identifying information was collected from either families or providers.

Data Analysis

Univariate analyses included frequency distributions for all variables. Measures of central tendency included medians and interquartile ranges. Most predictor and outcome variables were based on ordinal level measurement scales, thus nonparametric statistics were used for analyses. For bivariate comparisons, the Wilcoxon rank sum test and a two-sided type one error rate of 0.05 were used to determine significance.



The characteristics of the 150 caregivers responding to the family surveys are shown in Table 1. Nearly all caregivers were mothers (n=122; 81%) or fathers (n=19; 13%). All but one survey was conducted in English. Two-thirds of children who accompanied caregivers were three years old or younger (n=101; 67%), and very few were 12 years or older (n=3; 2%). Most caregivers had one, two, or three children living at home (n=119; 80%). Participants tended to be satisfied with the visit, with two-thirds extremely satisfied (n=101; 67%) and most of the remainder very satisfied (n=25; 17%) or satisfied (n=18; 12%).

Table 1: Demographics of caregiver participants.
Language Number % of total
English 115 99%
Spanish 1 1%
Relationship of caregiver to patient    
Mother 122 81%
Father 19 13%
Grandparent 5 3%
Foster parent 1 1%
Other 3 2%
Age range of child (patient)    
Infant (0-<1 year) 47 31%
Toddler (1-3 years) 54 36%
Preschool (4-6 years) 20 13%
School (6-11 years) 26 17%
Adolescent (12-18 years) 3 2%
Number of children living at home    
0 4 3%
1 36 24%
2 48 32%
3 35 24%
4 10 7%
5 11 7%
6 1 1%
7 3 2%
Satisfaction with provider visit    
1 -not at all satisfied 1 1%
2- slightly satisfied 5 3%
3- satisfied 18 12%
4- very satisfied 25 17%
5- extremely satisfied 101 67%

The majority of caregivers (n=76; 51%) reported being asked none of the seven QOL questions, i.e., they responded “no” or “not applicable” to each question. Of the 49% who were asked QOL questions, a majority were asked one (n=33; 22%) or two (n=21; 14%) questions. Table 2 shows the frequency with which each QOL question was asked. Caregivers were most frequently asked whether the child with cough’s sleep was affected, followed by being asked about their own coping strategy.

Table 2: The frequency caregivers were asked QOL questions.
QOL questions Yes No N/A
If child sleep affected 49 (33%) 99 (66%) 2 (1%)
If caregiver sleep affected 20 (13%) 1 130 (87%) 0
School days missed 23 (15%) 57 (38%) 69 (46%)
Caregiver missed work- days 9 (6%) 127 (85%) 14 (9%)
Lost wages 3 (2%) 134 (89%) 13 (9%)
Siblings sleep affected 12 (8%) 100 (67%) 38 (25%)
Caregiver coping strategy 38 (25%) 111 (74%) 1 (1%)


Table 3 shows that the typical respondent to the provider survey was female (n=159; 61%), young (n=151; 58% 40 years or younger) and had children (n=165; 63%). Most were attending level (n=198; 76%), specialized in Pediatric Emergency Medicine (n=195; 74%), and worked in a Pediatric Emergency Department (n=207; 79%).

Table 3: Demographics of physician/providers surveyed.
Gender Number % of total
Female 159 61%
Male 102 39%
20-30 25 10%
31-40 126 48%
41-50 60 23%
51-60 34 13%
61-70 13 5%
71* 4 2%
Have children    
Yes 165 63%
No 96 37%
Level of training    
Attending 198 76%
Fellow 37 14%
Resident 22 8%
Other 5 2%
Pediatrics 19 7%
Pediatric Emergency Medicine 195 74%
Emergency Medicine 46 17%
Other 3 1%
Practice setting    
PED ED 207 79%
ED 48 18%
Ped Urgent Care 5 2%
Urgent Care 2 1%
(Not all respondents answered all questions)

Providers did not report asking QOL questions frequently when patients presented with acute cough (Table 4). Using an ordinal scale for which the value of 3 was associated with “occasionally,” providers only asked two questions occasionally as measured by median values: if a child presenting with cough’s sleep was affected, and how many school days that child had missed. A majority of providers asked most questions rarely or never.

Table 4: Frequency with which providers report asking QOL questions and central tendency measured on an ordinal scale.
QOL questions Never Rarely Occas Freq Very freq Median IQR
If child sleep affected 20 (8%) 36 (14%) 86 (33%) 88 (33%) 33 (13%) 3 3,4
If parent sleep affected 80 (30%) 72 (27%) 72 (27%) 29 (11%) 10 (4%) 2 1,3
School days missed 31 (12%) 61 (23%) 98 (37%) 56 (21%) 17 (6%) 3 2,4
Caregiver missed work-days 90 (35%) 90 (35%) 61 (23%) 16 (6%) 3 (1%) 2 1,3
Lost wages 191 (73%) 57 (22%) 10 (4%) 3 (1%) 0 (0%) 1 1,2
Siblings sleep affected 176 (68%) 57 (22%) 20 (8%) 8 (3%) 1 (0%) 1 1,2
Caregiver coping strategy 90 (34%) 49 (19%) 57 (22%) 47 (18%) 20 (8%) 2 1,4

Bivariate-comparing caregivers to providers

Table 5 presents and compares values related to the importance caregivers and providers placed on each of the QOL questions in the surveys. Caregivers rated the importance of four specific questions significantly higher than providers: if their child’s sleep was affected (p<0.0001), how much school had been missed (p=0.0014), whether other children in the house were not sleeping well because of the child’s cough (p=0.0001), and the caregiver’s coping strategy (p=0.0001). Caregivers also rated the overall question about the importance of a provider asking QOL questions during a visit for a child presenting with cough (p<0.0001) higher than providers. There was no difference in how caregivers and providers scored the importance of questions about caregivers’ sleep, caregivers’ missed workdays, and lost wages.

Table 5: Differences between caregivers (UNM) and providers (national survey) in how they rate the importance of asking quality of life (QOL) questions.
QOL questions Caretaker Median (IQR) Provider Median (IQR) p-value
If child sleep affected 4 (3,5) 4 (3,4) 0.0000*
If caregiver sleep affected 3 (2,4) 3 (2,4) 0.064
School days missed 4 (3,5) 3 (3,4) 0.0014*
Caregiver missed work- days 3 (2,4) 3 (2,3) 0.38
Lost wages 2 (1,4) 2 (2,3) 0.12
Siblings sleep affected 3 (2,4) 3 (2,3) 0.0001*
Caregiver coping strategy 4 (3,5) 3 (3,4) 0.0001*
Overall importance of asking QOL questions 4 (3,5) 3 (3,4) 0.0000*

1=not at all important, 2=not very important, 3=somewhat important, 4=important, 5=very important”

*significant based on two-sample Wilcoxon rank-sum test

The relationship between being asked QOL questions and satisfaction

The number of QOL questions caregivers reported being asked ranged from 0 to 7, with a median (IQR) of 0 (0, 2). This number was slightly correlated with satisfaction scores (r=0.13), but not significantly (p=0.12). The distribution of satisfaction scores was skewed highly in favor of “satisfied” and “extremely satisfied” (Table 6) and there was little variance in this outcome regardless of the number of QOL questions asked. There was also no relationship between whether caregivers were asked any of the individual seven QOL questions and their visit satisfaction scores.

Table 6: Relationship between number of quality of life questions asked and caretaker satisfaction with ED visit.
Number of QOL questions asked Satisfaction Score Median (IQR)
None (n=76) 5 (4,5)
One (n=33) 5 (4,5)
Two (n=21) 5 (4,5)
Three (n=11) 5 (4,5)
Four (n=5) 5 (5,5)
Five (n=5) 5 (5,5)
Six (n=2) 5 (5,5)
Seven (n=2) 5 (5,5)

1=not at all satisfied, 2=slightly satisfied, 3=satisfied, 4=very satisfied, 5=extremely satisfied


To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine caregiver and physician beliefs regarding asking quality of life questions during a visit to an emergency department or urgent care for acute cough.

The major findings of this study are the following:

1. Caregivers rate highly the importance of being asked QOL questions during an emergency department visit for acute cough.

2. Caregivers of patients with acute cough rate the importance of being asked quality of life questions more highly than providers in the emergency department or urgent care.

3. Caregiver satisfaction with an emergency department visit for acute cough was not associated with being asked QOL questions during the visit.

It is well established that cough can have a considerable impact on the quality of life (QOL) of patients and their caregivers [3,4,6].

Physicians, especially in the emergency department or urgent care settings, are under pressure to manage patient flow and see patients as quickly as possible. Patients with cough present a challenge to providers as there is no medical cure or treatment for acute cough [3]. Additionally, there is no evidence in the literature for the effectiveness of over the counter (OTC) medications in young children to treat cough [20]. The use of OTC medications could be associated with adverse effects [21]. This leaves providers with little to offer families of children presenting with acute cough except for home remedies, supportive care and empathy.

If families rate highly the importance of being asked QOL questions during a visit for their child with acute cough, providers should express empathy by asking these questions. Asking these questions would add only an extra minute or two to the visit; and provide an outlet for caregivers to communicate their concerns and frustrations about a symptom with little or no treatment. At the very least, providers could ask the three questions shown to be of greatest importance to caregivers in this study, i.e., those related to loss of sleep for the patient, lost school days and caregiver strategies for coping with the cough.

Alternatively, acute cough QOL questionnaires could be given to families presenting with a child with a cough at triage. Answers to these questionnaires could be reviewed quickly before seeing the patient and pertinent issues noted from the questionnaires discussed.

In our study, parental satisfaction was not impacted by being asked QOL questions. This contrasts with the study results that examined the impact of a brief expectation survey on parental satisfaction in the pediatric emergency department. In that study, parental satisfaction with a visit increased when they had written their expectations for the visit in advance and the expectations were reviewed by the provider [22]. This is consistent with studies showing improved parental satisfaction with an emergency room visit when there is a good provider to parent communication [13-18,22].There is evidence that physician attitude, empathy and communication may be as important to parental satisfaction as patient waiting times.18, 23-26 In addition, studies show that communication training for residents and medical students results in improved patient interaction and satisfaction [27-30]. Strategies to introduce teaching of qualityof-life issues during medical school, residency and fellowship training could prove beneficial.

Caregiver satisfaction was not associated with being asked QOL questions in our study, and hypothesis 2 was not supported. These unexpected findings could be because overall satisfaction scores were high, and our study was underpowered to identify a difference with the ordinal scales used. Our results contrast with other studies showing a positive relationship between physician empathy and patient and parent satisfaction. It is reasonable to posit that asking QOL questions during an emergency encounter for cough, which has been shown to be important to caregivers, could be considered a proxy for perceived physician empathy.


Our study had some limitations. First, it was a one site study with almost exclusively English -speaking caregivers. Secondly, we did not use formally validated surveys, and the questions on the frequency of asking QOL questions were not exactly matched for the caregiver and physician surveys. Thirdly, we did not ask caregiver survey respondents if they were employed, making it difficult to assess the importance of asking the QOL question related to missing work and lost wages. Lastly, surveys were not self-administered by caregivers. This could have introduced bias if caregivers answered questions based on how they perceived they were expected to answer by interviewers.


Acute cough is a common complaint for pediatric patients presenting to the emergency room or urgent care center and impacts the quality of life of patients and their families. Parents or guardians of these patients rated highly the importance of being asked quality of life questions during a visit for cough, especially about loss of sleep for the child with cough, missed school days and how the caregiver is coping with the child’s cough.

Providers also believe it is important to ask these quality-oflife questions, especially those related to poor sleep or school absence, yet they do not routinely ask these questions. Providers should be asking caregivers quality of life questions during a pediatric visit for acute cough. Asking QOL questions can be a proxy for physician empathy


1. Birring SS, Kavanagh J, Lai K, Chang AB. Adult and paediatric cough guidelines: Ready for an overhaul? Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2015; 35: 137-144.

2. McCrory DC, Coeytaux RR, Yancy WS Jr, Schimt KM, Kemper AR, Goode A, et al. Assessment and Management of Chronic Cough. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2013 Jan. Report No.: 13-EHC032-EF. AHRQ Comparative Effectiveness Reviews. 2013.

3. Allen LV. Colds & cough. Int J Pharm Compd. 2012; 16: 480-483.

4. Marchant JM, Newcombe PA, Juniper EF, Sheffield JK, Stathis SL, Chang AB. What is the burden of chronic cough for families? Chest. 2008; 134: 303-309.

5. Cornford CS, Morgan M, Risdale L. Why do mothers consult when their children cough? Fam Pract. 1993; 10: 193-196.

6. Dicpinigaitis PV, Eccles R, Blaiss MS, Wingertzahn MA. Impact of cough and common cold on productivity, absenteeism, and daily life in the United States: ACHOO Survey. Curr Med Res Opin. 2015; 31: 1519- 1525.

7. Schmit KM, Coeytaux, Goode AP, McCrory DC, Yancy WS Jr, Kemper AR, et al. Evaluating cough assessment tools: a systematic review. Chest. 2013; 144: 1819-1826.

8. Newcombe PA, Sheffield JK, Petsky HL, Marchant JM, Willis C, Chang AB. A child chronic cough-specific quality of life measure: development and validation. Thorax. 2016; 71: 695-700.

9. Newcombe PA, Sheffield JK, Petsky HL, Juniper EF, Willis C, Chang AB. Validation of a parent-proxy quality of life questionnaire for paediatric chronic cough (PC-QOL). Thorax. 2010; 65: 819-823.

10. Newcombe PA, Sheffield JK, Chang AB. Parent cough- specific quality of life: development and validation of a short form. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013; 131: 1069-1074.

11. Hartnick CJ, Zurakowski D, Haver K. Validation of a pediatric cough questionnaire. Ear Nose Throat J. 2009; 88: 1213-1217.

12. Anderson- James S, Newcombe PA, Marchant JM, AcWorth JP, Stone DG, Turner CT, et al. An acute cough-specific quality-of-life questionnaire for children: Development and validation. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015; 135: 1179-1185.

13. Worthington K. Customer satisfaction in the emergency department. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2004; 22: 87-102.

14. Matusitz J, Spear J. Effective doctor- patient communication: an updated examination. Soc Work Public Health. 2014; 29: 252-266.

15. Sarah Smith Mc Alvin, Aimee Carew-Lyons. Family Presence during Resuscitation and Invasive Procedures in Pediatric Critical Care: A Systematic Review. Am J Crit Care. 2014; 23: 477-485.

16. Byczkowski TL, Fitzgerald M, Kennebeck S, Vaughn L, Myers K, Kachelmeyer A, et al. A comprehensive view of parental satisfaction with pediatric emergency department visits. Ann Emerg Med. 2013; 62: 340-350.

17. Brown K, Sheehan E, Sawyer M, Raftos J, Smyth V. Parent satisfaction with services in an emergency department located at a paediatric teaching hospital. J Paediatr Child Health. 1995; 31: 435-439.

18. Pagnamenta R, Benger JR. Factors influencing parent satisfaction in a children’s emergency department: prospective questionnaire-based study. Emerg Med J. 2008; 25: 417-419.

19. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JA. Research electronic data capture (REDCap) - A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support, J Biomed Inform. 2009; 42: 377-381.

20. Ryan T, Brewer M, Small L. Over the counter cough and cold medication use in young children. Pediatr Nurs. 2008; 34: 174-180.

21. Schaefer MK, Shehab N, Cohen AL, Budnitz DS. Adverse events from cough and cold medications in children. Pediatrics. 2008; 121: 783- 787.

22. Spahr CD, Flugstad NA, Brousseau DC. The impact of a brief expectation survey on parental satisfaction in the pediatric emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2006; 13: 1280-1287.

23. Menendez ME, Chen NC, Mudgal CS, Jupiter JB, Ring D. Physician Empathy as a Driver of Hand Surgery Patient Satisfaction. J Hand Surg Am. 2015; 40: 1860-1865.

24. Kortlever JTP, Ottenhoff JSE, Vagner GA, Ring D, Reichel LM. Visit Duration Does Not Correlate with Perceived Physician Empathy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019; 101: 296-301.

25. Uhas AA, Camacho FT, Feldman SR, Balakrishnan R. The Relationship Between Physician Friendliness and Caring, and Patient Satisfaction: Findings from an Internet – Based Survey. Patient. 2008; 1: 91-96.

26. Beattie M, Atherton I, McLennan B. Compassion or speed, which is a more accurate indicator of healthcare quality in the emergency department from the patients’ perspective? Int J Pers Cent Med. 2012; 2: 647-655.

27. Choudhary A, Gupta V. Teaching communications skills to medical students: Introducing the fine art of medical practice. Int J App Basic Res. 2015; 5: 41-44.

28. Orhan C, Mehmet A, Levent S, Congologlu ED, Canbaz H, Kilic E, et al. Communication skill training for emergency medicine residents. Eur J Emerg Med. 2012; 19: 9-13.

29. Sullivan AM, Rock LK, Gadmer NM, Norwich DE, Schwartzstein RM. The Impact of Resident Training on Communication with Families in the Intensive Care Unit. Resident and Family Outcomes. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016; 13: 512-521.

30. Boissy A, Windover AK, Bokar D, Karafa M, Neuendorf K, Frankel RM, et al. Communications skills training for physicians improves patient satisfaction. J Gen Intern Med. 2016; 31: 755-761.


Objective: Acute cough in children is a common reason for emergency department (ED) visits and impacts the quality of life (QOL) of patients and their families. Study objectives were to compare how parents/guardians (caregivers) versus providers rate the importance of asking QOL questions during an ED encounter for acute cough; and determine whether asking QOL questions is linked with parental satisfaction with the visit.

Methods: This cross-sectional study sampled two groups: caregivers of pediatric patients presenting to an urban Pediatric ED; and physicians responding to an online survey.

Results: We surveyed 150 caregivers (81% mothers and 13% fathers); two-thirds had children younger than three years old. Providers were also surveyed (61% female, 39% male), most worked in a pediatric ED (79%). Caregivers recalled being asked few or no QOL questions during the visit. Questions rated as more important by caregivers than by providers were: the index child’s loss of sleep (p<0.0001), school days missed (p<0.0014), and the caregiver’s coping strategies (p<0.0001). There was no relationship between caregiver satisfaction with the ED visit for their child with acute cough and being asked QOL questions during the visit.

Conclusions: Caregivers rated highly the importance of being asked QOL questions during a pediatric ED visit for acute cough, especially loss of sleep for their child with cough, missed school days and their coping strategies for cough. Providers should be asking QOL questions as they are important to caregivers.


Acute cough; Quality of life questions; Loss of sleep; Pediatric patients/child; Parental satisfaction

Amoni IN, Fullerton L, Sapien RE. Do Parents or Guardians of Pediatric Patients With Acute Cough Consider Quality of Life (QOL) Questions Important, and Do Providers Ask Them? Ann Pediatr Child Health 2023; 11(1): 1296.

Received : 06 Dec 2022
Accepted : 09 Jan 2023
Published : 12 Jan 2023
Annals of Otolaryngology and Rhinology
ISSN : 2379-948X
Launched : 2014
JSM Schizophrenia
Launched : 2016
Journal of Nausea
Launched : 2020
JSM Internal Medicine
Launched : 2016
JSM Hepatitis
Launched : 2016
JSM Oro Facial Surgeries
ISSN : 2578-3211
Launched : 2016
Journal of Human Nutrition and Food Science
ISSN : 2333-6706
Launched : 2013
JSM Regenerative Medicine and Bioengineering
ISSN : 2379-0490
Launched : 2013
JSM Spine
ISSN : 2578-3181
Launched : 2016
Archives of Palliative Care
ISSN : 2573-1165
Launched : 2016
JSM Nutritional Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3203
Launched : 2017
Annals of Neurodegenerative Disorders
ISSN : 2476-2032
Launched : 2016
Journal of Fever
ISSN : 2641-7782
Launched : 2017
JSM Bone Marrow Research
ISSN : 2578-3351
Launched : 2016
JSM Mathematics and Statistics
ISSN : 2578-3173
Launched : 2014
Journal of Autoimmunity and Research
ISSN : 2573-1173
Launched : 2014
JSM Arthritis
ISSN : 2475-9155
Launched : 2016
JSM Head and Neck Cancer-Cases and Reviews
ISSN : 2573-1610
Launched : 2016
JSM General Surgery Cases and Images
ISSN : 2573-1564
Launched : 2016
JSM Anatomy and Physiology
ISSN : 2573-1262
Launched : 2016
JSM Dental Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1548
Launched : 2016
Annals of Emergency Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1017
Launched : 2016
Annals of Mens Health and Wellness
ISSN : 2641-7707
Launched : 2017
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Health Care
ISSN : 2576-0084
Launched : 2018
Journal of Chronic Diseases and Management
ISSN : 2573-1300
Launched : 2016
Annals of Vaccines and Immunization
ISSN : 2378-9379
Launched : 2014
JSM Heart Surgery Cases and Images
ISSN : 2578-3157
Launched : 2016
Annals of Reproductive Medicine and Treatment
ISSN : 2573-1092
Launched : 2016
JSM Brain Science
ISSN : 2573-1289
Launched : 2016
JSM Biomarkers
ISSN : 2578-3815
Launched : 2014
JSM Biology
ISSN : 2475-9392
Launched : 2016
Archives of Stem Cell and Research
ISSN : 2578-3580
Launched : 2014
Annals of Clinical and Medical Microbiology
ISSN : 2578-3629
Launched : 2014
JSM Pediatric Surgery
ISSN : 2578-3149
Launched : 2017
Journal of Memory Disorder and Rehabilitation
ISSN : 2578-319X
Launched : 2016
JSM Tropical Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2578-3165
Launched : 2016
JSM Head and Face Medicine
ISSN : 2578-3793
Launched : 2016
JSM Cardiothoracic Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1297
Launched : 2016
JSM Bone and Joint Diseases
ISSN : 2578-3351
Launched : 2017
JSM Bioavailability and Bioequivalence
ISSN : 2641-7812
Launched : 2017
JSM Atherosclerosis
ISSN : 2573-1270
Launched : 2016
Journal of Genitourinary Disorders
ISSN : 2641-7790
Launched : 2017
Journal of Fractures and Sprains
ISSN : 2578-3831
Launched : 2016
Journal of Autism and Epilepsy
ISSN : 2641-7774
Launched : 2016
Annals of Marine Biology and Research
ISSN : 2573-105X
Launched : 2014
JSM Health Education & Primary Health Care
ISSN : 2578-3777
Launched : 2016
JSM Communication Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3807
Launched : 2016
Annals of Musculoskeletal Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3599
Launched : 2016
Annals of Virology and Research
ISSN : 2573-1122
Launched : 2014
JSM Renal Medicine
ISSN : 2573-1637
Launched : 2016
Journal of Muscle Health
ISSN : 2578-3823
Launched : 2016
JSM Genetics and Genomics
ISSN : 2334-1823
Launched : 2013
JSM Anxiety and Depression
ISSN : 2475-9139
Launched : 2016
Clinical Journal of Heart Diseases
ISSN : 2641-7766
Launched : 2016
Annals of Medicinal Chemistry and Research
ISSN : 2378-9336
Launched : 2014
JSM Pain and Management
ISSN : 2578-3378
Launched : 2016
JSM Women's Health
ISSN : 2578-3696
Launched : 2016
Clinical Research in HIV or AIDS
ISSN : 2374-0094
Launched : 2013
Journal of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Obesity
ISSN : 2333-6692
Launched : 2013
Journal of Substance Abuse and Alcoholism
ISSN : 2373-9363
Launched : 2013
JSM Neurosurgery and Spine
ISSN : 2373-9479
Launched : 2013
Journal of Liver and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2379-0830
Launched : 2014
Journal of Drug Design and Research
ISSN : 2379-089X
Launched : 2014
JSM Clinical Oncology and Research
ISSN : 2373-938X
Launched : 2013
JSM Bioinformatics, Genomics and Proteomics
ISSN : 2576-1102
Launched : 2014
JSM Chemistry
ISSN : 2334-1831
Launched : 2013
Journal of Trauma and Care
ISSN : 2573-1246
Launched : 2014
JSM Surgical Oncology and Research
ISSN : 2578-3688
Launched : 2016
Annals of Food Processing and Preservation
ISSN : 2573-1033
Launched : 2016
Journal of Radiology and Radiation Therapy
ISSN : 2333-7095
Launched : 2013
JSM Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
ISSN : 2578-3572
Launched : 2016
Annals of Clinical Pathology
ISSN : 2373-9282
Launched : 2013
Annals of Cardiovascular Diseases
ISSN : 2641-7731
Launched : 2016
Journal of Behavior
ISSN : 2576-0076
Launched : 2016
Annals of Clinical and Experimental Metabolism
ISSN : 2572-2492
Launched : 2016
Clinical Research in Infectious Diseases
ISSN : 2379-0636
Launched : 2013
JSM Microbiology
ISSN : 2333-6455
Launched : 2013
Journal of Urology and Research
ISSN : 2379-951X
Launched : 2014
Journal of Family Medicine and Community Health
ISSN : 2379-0547
Launched : 2013
Annals of Pregnancy and Care
ISSN : 2578-336X
Launched : 2017
JSM Cell and Developmental Biology
ISSN : 2379-061X
Launched : 2013
Annals of Aquaculture and Research
ISSN : 2379-0881
Launched : 2014
Clinical Research in Pulmonology
ISSN : 2333-6625
Launched : 2013
Journal of Immunology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2333-6714
Launched : 2013
Annals of Forensic Research and Analysis
ISSN : 2378-9476
Launched : 2014
JSM Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
ISSN : 2333-7109
Launched : 2013
Annals of Breast Cancer Research
ISSN : 2641-7685
Launched : 2016
Annals of Gerontology and Geriatric Research
ISSN : 2378-9409
Launched : 2014
Journal of Sleep Medicine and Disorders
ISSN : 2379-0822
Launched : 2014
JSM Burns and Trauma
ISSN : 2475-9406
Launched : 2016
Chemical Engineering and Process Techniques
ISSN : 2333-6633
Launched : 2013
Annals of Clinical Cytology and Pathology
ISSN : 2475-9430
Launched : 2014
JSM Allergy and Asthma
ISSN : 2573-1254
Launched : 2016
Journal of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
ISSN : 2334-2307
Launched : 2013
Annals of Sports Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2379-0571
Launched : 2014
JSM Sexual Medicine
ISSN : 2578-3718
Launched : 2016
Annals of Vascular Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2378-9344
Launched : 2014
JSM Biotechnology and Biomedical Engineering
ISSN : 2333-7117
Launched : 2013
Journal of Hematology and Transfusion
ISSN : 2333-6684
Launched : 2013
JSM Environmental Science and Ecology
ISSN : 2333-7141
Launched : 2013
Journal of Cardiology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2333-6676
Launched : 2013
JSM Nanotechnology and Nanomedicine
ISSN : 2334-1815
Launched : 2013
Journal of Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders
ISSN : 2475-9473
Launched : 2016
JSM Ophthalmology
ISSN : 2333-6447
Launched : 2013
Journal of Pharmacology and Clinical Toxicology
ISSN : 2333-7079
Launched : 2013
Annals of Psychiatry and Mental Health
ISSN : 2374-0124
Launched : 2013
Medical Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
ISSN : 2333-6439
Launched : 2013
JSM Clinical Pharmaceutics
ISSN : 2379-9498
Launched : 2014
JSM Foot and Ankle
ISSN : 2475-9112
Launched : 2016
JSM Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementia
ISSN : 2378-9565
Launched : 2014
Journal of Addiction Medicine and Therapy
ISSN : 2333-665X
Launched : 2013
Journal of Veterinary Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2378-931X
Launched : 2013
Annals of Public Health and Research
ISSN : 2378-9328
Launched : 2014
Annals of Orthopedics and Rheumatology
ISSN : 2373-9290
Launched : 2013
Journal of Clinical Nephrology and Research
ISSN : 2379-0652
Launched : 2014
Annals of Community Medicine and Practice
ISSN : 2475-9465
Launched : 2014
Annals of Biometrics and Biostatistics
ISSN : 2374-0116
Launched : 2013
JSM Clinical Case Reports
ISSN : 2373-9819
Launched : 2013
Journal of Cancer Biology and Research
ISSN : 2373-9436
Launched : 2013
Journal of Surgery and Transplantation Science
ISSN : 2379-0911
Launched : 2013
Journal of Dermatology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2373-9371
Launched : 2013
JSM Gastroenterology and Hepatology
ISSN : 2373-9487
Launched : 2013
Annals of Nursing and Practice
ISSN : 2379-9501
Launched : 2014
JSM Dentistry
ISSN : 2333-7133
Launched : 2013
Author Information X