Loading

Annals of Psychiatry and Mental Health

Increasing High-Risk Sexual Behavior among Adolescents in 10 Cities of China

Research Article | Open Access

  • 1. Medical Psychological Center, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, China
  • 2. Key Laboratory of Psychiatry and Mental Health of Hunan Province, Central South University, China
  • 3. Medical Psychological Institute, Central South University, China
+ Show More - Show Less
Corresponding Authors
Shuqiao Yao, Medical Psychological Center, Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, #139 Renmin Road, Changsha 410011, China, Tel: 8673185292126, Fax: 86-731-85361328
Abstract

This study was to describe the prevalence of risky sexual behavior and identify correlates in Chinese adolescents. An anonymous self-reported survey was administered to 10,445 high-school students. The prevalence of having ever had sexual intercourse was 13.3%. Among currently sexually active students (6.3%), 25.0% had used alcohol or drugs before the last sexual intercourse, and 45.4% reported contraceptive nonuse. Unstable parents’ marital status, low subjective socioeconomic status, low self-esteem, and impulsiveness were risk factors for risky sexual behaviors in adolescents. The prevalence of sexual behavior and associated risks are increasing among Chinese adolescents, indicating the necessity of providing sex education.

Citation

Chen Y, Lei X, Yi J, Yao S (2017) Increasing High-Risk Sexual Behavior among Adolescents in 10 Cities of China. Ann Psychiatry Ment Health 5(3): 1100.

Keywords

•    Sexual behavior
•    Risk
•    Chinese
•    High school
•    Adolescent

ABBREVIATIONS

RSBs: Risky Sexual Behaviors; STDs: Sexually Transmitted Diseases, HIV: Human Immunodeficiency Virus; SES: Socioeconomic Status; YRBS: Youth Risk Behavior Survey; SES: Self-Esteem Scale; BIS-11: Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-11; SSSCA: Social Support Scale for Children and Adolescents; FES: Family Environment Scale; CES-D: Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale; MASC: Multidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children; OR: Odds Ratio; CI: Confidence Interval.

INTRODUCTION

Early onset sexual activity and contraceptive nonuse are considered risky sexual behaviors (RSBs) that place individuals at risk of pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) [1]. Research results showed that RSBs are prevalent among teenagers. For example, in the United States, 70.6% of females and 64.7% of males aged 18-19 years reported having sexual intercourse [2], and approximately one-fifth (1 million) of sexually active females aged 15-19 years become pregnant each year; most of these pregnancies are unplanned [3]. Also, the risk of STD infection is higher among teenagers than adults [4,5]. At the same time, a paucity of research has examined RSBs in Chinese adolescents.

Preliminary results examining RSBs in Chinese adolescents indicated that sexual behavior is less prevalent among Chinese adolescents compared with developed countries [6-8]. In a 2005 national survey, 4.8% of high-school students reported having sexual intercourse [7]. In 2009, the National Working Committee on Children and Women under the State Council and United Nations Population Fund China conducted the first national survey of youths’ access and utilization of sexual and reproductive health services in China. Preliminary findings showed that 22.4% of China’ youths aged 15-24 years had sexual experience, and notably, 10.9% of urban adolescents aged 15-19 years had sexual experience [8]. However, these survey results also suggest that RSBs are becoming more commonplace [8]. The prevalence of sexual behavior in urban Chinese adolescents increased from 4.8% in 2005 to 10.9% in 2009 [7,8], while the rate of condom use (<50%) remained much lower than in the US (60.2% in 2011) [6,9].In China, sexuality is viewed more liberally in urban areas, increasing the prevalence of sexual behavior among adolescents [6,8,10]. For example, among 1,126 college students in Beijing, 82.76% considered non-marital sex to be acceptable [11]. With rapid economic development in China, more individuals and families have moved from rural areas to cities, Chinese youth have increased exposure to urban lifestyles, and as norms begin to change, Chinese youth may be more susceptible to peer pressure. Rapid changes in the prevalence of sexual behavior among Chinese adolescents have profound implications for the spread of HIV and other STDs.

China has the largest population among countries worldwide, and notably, has the largest adolescent populations (National Bureau of Statistics of China, 2010). Therefore, raising awareness regarding the outcomes of RSBs, identifying factors contributing to RSB in adolescents and providing effective interventions are critical, as it will help to control the unplanned pregnancy and the spread of STDs. The identification of factors correlated with RSBs is a foregoing and important step to establish effective interventions.

Many recent publications have described risk and protective factors associated with RSBs among youth [12]. Age and gender have been related to condom use and RSBs, although results have been inconsistent [13]. Urban/rural residence was also an factor influencing sexual activity [6,8,10]. Subjective socioeconomic status (SES) has been positively associated with later sexual debut [14]. Family structure and environment significantly predicted risky sexual behaviors and pregnancy in adolescent [15].Impulsiveness has been found to affect RSBs in adolescents [15-17]. Self-esteem has often been examined in relationship to RSBs, particularly among adolescent females [14,15,17-19]. Also, emotional distress, such as depression and anxiety, has been shown to be a risk factor of RSBs [20-22].

Therefore, the objectives of this study were to (a) describe the prevalence of high risk sexual behavior in Chinese adolescents and (b) identify independent variables associated with RSBs among sexually active Chinese adolescents using a multivariate model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Participants

Participants were recruited from high-schools. Specifically, participants were in grades 10–12, and assessments occurred in 10 different cities divided by economic growth: high (Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou), moderate (Hangzhou, Suzhou, Shenyang, Changsha), and low (Yinchuan, Chengdu, Changping) (National Bureau of Statistics of China, 2013). Finally, 11,039 high school students attended anonymous survey, while 10,445 finished the survey.

All high schools in the 10 cities were stratified based on academic standards (high, medium, and low). Then, in each city, one to two schools ranked as medium were randomly selected for subject recruitment. In March–September 2011, an anonymous survey was administered to students from18 schools. The ethics committee of the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University approved the study. Participants and their parents provided written informed consent before the survey began.

Measures

Sociodemographic information (students’ age, grade, gender, ethnicity, sibling status; parents’ marital status) were collected. Respondents rated subjective SES relative to provincial and school populations on a 10-point scale (10 = highest SES) using the Chinese version of the Scale of Subjective Status [23].

We used the following the Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS) items to evaluate sexual behaviors: whether the student had ever had sexual intercourse; whether first sexual intercourse occurred before the age of 13 years; whether the student had four or more lifetime sexual partners; whether he/she was currently sexually active; whether he/she used condoms, oral contraceptives, or other contraception before the last sexual intercourse; and whether he/she had consumed alcohol or drugs before the last sexual intercourse [24].

Global self-esteem was measured using the 10-item Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (SES), which assesses respondents’ self-rated “general outlook on life” by measuring positive and negative feelings about the self (higher score = higher level of self-esteem) [25].

Impulsiveness was assessed using the 30-item Chinese version of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-11 (BIS-11), a widely used instrument that asks participants to rate the frequency of common (non)impulsive activities (1 [rarely/never] to 4 [almost always/always]; higher score = higher level of impulsiveness) [26].

The availability of social support was assessed by the Social Support Scale for Children and Adolescents (SSSCA) ,which included 24 items to assess children’s perceptions of the availability of social support from their parents, classmates, and close friends (item scores, 0-2; total scores, 0-24; higher score = less perceived social support) [27].

We used the 27-item Family Relationship Index of the Family Environment Scale (FES) to examine cohesion (degrees of commitment, help, support among family members), expressiveness (encouragement of open, direct expression of feelings among family members), and conflict (amounts of openly expressed anger, aggression, conflict among family members) in the family. Higher cohesion and expressiveness subscale scores and a lower conflict subscale score indicate a better-quality family environment [28].

Finally, the 20-item Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) and the 39-item Multidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children (MASC) were used to assess the frequency of depressive and anxiety symptoms in the past week, respectively. The CES-D includes 20 items (0 [rarely] to 3 [most of the time]; total scores, 0-60; higher score = higher level of depressive symptoms) and the MASC includes 39 items (0 [never] to 4 [often]; total scores, 0-117; higher score = higher level of anxiety symptoms) [29-31].

Statistical analyses

All analyses were performed using SPSS software (ver. 18.0 for Windows; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Means, standard deviations (SDs), and percentages of variables were calculated. Differences in demographic characteristics, scores, and prevalence of sexual behavior among study groups were analyzed by chi-squared and independent-samples t-tests. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to examine factors correlated with condom and contraceptive nonuse during the last sexual activity among currently sexually active students. Sociodemographic (e.g., gender, sibling status, parents’ marital and educational status, and subjective SES) and psychological (e.g., self-esteem, impulsiveness, family environment, social support, depression and anxiety) factors served as independent variables. Statistical significance of all two-tailed tests was set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Descriptive Data

The final sample consisted of 10,445 students (5,071 girls, 5,374 boys) ranging in age from 15 to 20 years (mean = 16.55; SD = 1.39). The sociodemographic characteristics of the study sample are presented in Table (1). Most (95.1%) respondents were of Han ethnicity, consistent with the ethnic distribution in mainland China. Regarding sibling status, the majority (58.3%) of students were only child whereas 41.7% had siblings. Most students’ parents had stable marriages (89.3%) and junior high school or less educational levels (fathers, 49.9%; mothers, 58.0%). Average subjective SES ratings were above scale midpoints for provincial (mean, 5.83; SD, 1.57; range, 1-10) and school (mean, 6.32; SD, 1.51; range, 1-10) populations.

The Prevalence’s of Sexual Behaviors

Sexual behavior data are presented in Table (2). In this sample, 13.3% of students reported having sexual intercourse. This proportion was significantly higher among males than females (p < 0.05), highest among 12th-graders, and lowest among 10th-graders (all p < 0.05).

Initial Sexual Experience: Less than 3% of students reported having first sexual intercourse before the age of 13 years. This behavior was more prevalent in males than females (p < 0.05) overall, but more prevalent among females than males in the 11th and 12th grades (all p < 0.05). The prevalence was highest among 11th-graders and lowest among 10th-graders (p < 0.05). Significantly more female than male students who had ever had sexual intercourse reported this behavior among 11th- and 12th-graders (p < 0.05).

Multiple Sexual Partners: In the entire sample, 4.2% of students reported having four or more lifetime sexual partners. This behavior was more prevalent among males than females, and least prevalent among10th-graders (both p <0.05). More female than male students who had ever had sexual intercourse reported this behavior (p < 0.05). This gender difference was most apparent in 10th- and 11th-graders.

Currently Sexually Active: Overall, 6.3% of students reported having sexual intercourse with at least one person during the last 3 months (currently sexually active). More males than females were currently sexually active (p < 0.05). However, no significant gender difference was observed among students who had ever had sexual intercourse. More students in 11th-grade than in 10th- grade were currently sexually active (p < 0.05).

Contraceptive Use: Among currently sexually active students, 30.9% reported condom use and 17.7% reported oral contraceptive use during/before the last sexual intercourse. The prevalence of condom use was higher among males than females, highest among11th-graders, and lowest among10th-graders. Oral contraceptive use was more prevalent among females than males, highest among 11th-grade females, and lowest among 10th-grade males (all p < 0.05). Nearly half (45.4%) of sexually active students reported contraceptive nonuse before the last sexual intercourse. The prevalence of this behavior was higher in 10th-grade than in other grades (both p < 0.05). Both in 10th-12th-graders, the prevalence of contraceptive nonuse was higher among females than males (both p < 0.05).

Alcohol or Drug Use: One-quarter (25.0%) of sexually active students reported alcohol or drug use before the last sexual intercourse. This behavior was more prevalent among males than females (p < 0.05) and most prevalent in 12th-grade females.

Psychological Measure Outcomes

Means and SDs of sociodemographic and psychological measures are presented in Table (3) according to condom (non) use during the last sexual activity. Adolescents who did not use condoms had higher BIS-11scores, CES-D scores, and parents and friends SSSCA subscale scores (all p < 0.05), while lower subjective SES (school) (p < 0.01) and FES cohesion subscale scores (p < 0.05) than did adolescents who used condoms. No significant difference in other scores was observed between adolescents with condom use and those without condom use (all p > 0.05).

Factors Correlated with Contraceptive Use

In multivariate analyses, significant independent predictors of condom use among currently sexually active students were parents’ marital status, subjective SES (school), BIS-11 scores, FES conflict scores, and other psychological variables (all p < 0.05). Parents’ marital status (odds ratio [OR], 1.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11–1.53), subjective SES (school) (OR, 0·68; 95% CI, 0.56–0.83), self-esteem (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.61– 0.98), impulsiveness (OR, 1.24; CI, 1.14–1.42), and FES conflict scores (OR, 1.461; CI, 1.16–1.84) were related to condom nonuse among sexually active students (all p < 0.05).Unstable parents’ marital status, low subjective SES at school, low self-esteem, high impulsiveness and high family conflict were risk factors of condom nonuse among currently sexually active students.

Multivariate analyses identified the following significant independent predictors of contraceptive nonuse among currently sexually active students: parents’ marital status, mother’s educational level, subjective SES, BIS-11 scores, SSSCA parent’s scores, and self-esteem (all p < 0.05). Parents’ marital status (OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.03–1.58), mother’s educational level (OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.82–0.94), subjective SES (school) (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.65–0.91), self-esteem (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.78–0.92), and impulsiveness (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.04–1.59) were related to contraceptive nonuse among currently sexually active students. Unstable parents’ marital status, low mother’s educational level, low subjective SES at school, low self-esteem, and high impulsiveness were risk factors of contraceptive nonuse among currently sexually active students.

Table 1: Descriptive Characteristics of Urban Chinese High-School Students.

  10th grade
(n = 4,855)
11th grade
(n = 3,623)
12th grade
(n = 1,967)
Total sample
(n = 10,445)
Age (years) 15.85 ± 1.32 16.84 ± 0.97 17.73 ± 1.19 16.55 ± 1.39
Sex (males)ª 53.7% 49.1% 50.2% 51.5%
Ethnicity (Han)b 96.4% 93.9% 94.1% 95.1%
Sibling status (none) 56.6% 61.1% 57.2% 58.3%
Parents’ marital status 
 Stable
90.3% 88.0% 89.1% 89.3%
 Divorced 4.2% 5.8% 6.3% 5.1%
 Single parent 2.5% 2.6% 2.1% 2.5%
 Remarried 3.0% 3.5% 2.5% 3.1%
Father’s education        
 Junior high school or less 50.8% 46.4% 54.4% 49.9%
 High school 29.5% 28.1% 30.8% 29.3%
 University or more 19.7% 25.5% 14.8% 20.8%
Mother’s education        
 Junior high school or less 59.0% 54.3% 62.1% 58.0%
 High school 25.7% 25.9% 27.8% 26.2%
 University or more 15.3% 19.8% 10.1% 15.8%
Subjective SES (province) 5.85 ± 1.58 5.84 ± 1.56 5.76 ± 1.55 5.83 ± 1.57
Subjective SES (school) 6.27 ± 1.51 6.33 ± 1.49 6.45 ± 1.·52 6.32 ± 1.51
ªPercentage of male; b Percentage of Han nationality; SES, socioeconomic status.

Table 2: Sexual Behavior among High-School Students.

  10th grade (n= 4855) 11th grade (n= 3623) 12th grade (n = 1967) Total sample (n=10445)
  Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female Total
Ever had sexual intercourse 13.3% 4.8% 9.4% 17.7% 12.1% 15.3% 23.3% 15.1% 19.1% 16.6% 9.7% 13.3%
Sexual intercourse <13 years oldª 3.0% (23.1%) 1.0% (21%) 2.1% (22.3%) 3.2% (18.1%) 3.9% (32%) 3.5% (22.9%) 3.0% (12.9%) 3.8% (25.2%) 3.4% (17.8%) 3.0% (18.1%) 2.7% (27.8%) 2.9% (21.8%)
Sexual intercourse with ≥4 personsb 3.2% (24.1%) 2.4% (50%) 2.9% (31%) 4.9% (27.7%) 5.5% (45.5%) 5.2% (34.0%) 7.1% (30.4%) 4.2% (27.8%) 5.7% (29.8%) 4.4% (26.5%) 4.0% (41.2%) 4.2% (31.6%)
Sexually active (last 3 months)ª 5.6% (42.1%) 2.4% (50.0%) 4.1% (43.6%) 9.2% (52.0%) 6.5% (53.7%) 7.8% (51.0%) 12.0% (51.5%) 5.5% (36.4%) 8.8% (46.1%) 8.0% (48.2%) 4.5% (46.4%) 6.3% (47.4%)
Condom useb 26.9% 23.6% 26.0% 38.7% 30.6% 35.2% 31.0% 25.9% 30.0% 32.5% 28.1% 30.9%
Oral contraceptive useb 14.1% 17.2% 16.4% 16.0% 21.5% 18.3% 19.3% 20.0% 19.8% 16.4% 20.2% 17.7%
Contraceptive nonuseb 47.9% 56.4% 50.0% 46.0% 40.5% 43.7% 40.0% 50.0% 43.0% 44.9% 46.5% 45.4%
Alcohol or drug useb 26.2% 25.5% 26.0% 25.8% 16.5% 21.8% 27.1% 32.8% 29.1% 26.2% 22.8% 25.0%
ª Parenthetical data represent a subsample of students who had ever had sexual intercourse.
b During last sexual intercourse, among currently sexually active students.

 

DISCUSSION

RSBs place individuals at risk of adverse health outcomes and burden health care systems [5,32]. Various situational/ contextual factors (e.g., condom, drug, alcohol availability) and individual variables (e.g., personality traits, knowledge about STD transmission, emotional distress) may contribute to the extent to which individuals engage in such behaviors [20-22,32,33].

In this study, 13.3% of Chinese high-school students, and more males than females, reported ever having sexual intercourse. Patterns in RSBs and preventive behaviors among sexually active students in this study demonstrate that Chinese adolescents might be at high risk of STD infection and unintended pregnancy. Nearly two-thirds of students reported condom nonuse, in contrast to the 60.2% use rate among US high-school students [9]. Approximately half of STD cases diagnosed annually in the US occur in youth aged 15-24 years [33], 39% of all new HIV infections are in individuals aged 13-29 years [34], and the pregnancy rate is approximately 7% among girls aged 15-19 years [35]. Given the greater prevalence of some RSBs among Chinese adolescents despite the lower overall prevalence of sexual behavior, further studies examining STD infection and unwanted pregnancy are needed. Official data reveal that 0.2% of Chinese individuals aged 15–24 years are infected with HIV in 2009, but do not indicate what proportion has had sexual experience before the age of 15 years (Ministry of Health of the People’s Republic of China, 2010).

Our finding that condom use was least prevalent among 10th-graders is consistent with observations in other developing countries that use increases with age [36]. Youth are less knowledgeable about self-protection and lack planning skills to avoid unsafe sex [8]. They may also lack access to condoms or be less cautious about sex than older students. The importance of condom use is increasingly recognized in China, but the utilization of condom remains lower than in Western countries. China’s first condom advertisement was released on China’s Central Television in 1999, while which had been banned shortly after its release because government officials argued condom advertisements were illegal. China’s first major television campaign promoting condom use was launched in 2007, and condom sales had increased notably by early 2010. However, utilization remains low. Individuals’ attitudes about condom use affect others’ likelihood of engaging in RSBs, particularly early sexual debut and condom nonuse [37]. Our results, particularly the low condom use rate among sexually active of 10th-graders, indicate the necessity of providing Chinese youth with effective, comprehensive school-based sexuality education emphasizing the risks of unsafe sex and providing information about self-protection (and perhaps distributing condoms) in adolescence, especially at the beginning of high school. In the United States, National Sexuality Education Standards were developed to provide age-appropriate sexuality education at different grade levels, which could be put into practice in classroom (Future of Sex Education Initiative, 2012). Similar school-based education program is needed for Chinese adolescents. Public resistance represents the main challenge to implementing such a program.

Sexuality education begins at home, and adolescents continue to receive information about sexuality attitude and behavior from their family, especially from their parents. Socioeconomic indicators that significantly predict RSBs and pregnancy in adolescents include having a parent with low educational status and living in a single-parent family [15]. Compared to adolescents from two-parent families, adolescents from single-parent families were significantly more likely to report having ever had sexual intercourse. The divorce rate in China has increased from 1.8‰ in 2002 to 2.8‰ in 2015 (Development Statistics Report in 2002 of the Ministry of Civil Affairs, 2003 Development Statistics Report in 2015 of the Ministry of Civil Affairs, 2016). More than 10% of adolescents in our study reported instability in their parents’ marriages, including divorce, remarriage, and single-parent families. This instability was a significant factor in the likelihood of sexual experience (ever had intercourse, currently sexually active) and high-risk sexual behavior (condom and other contraceptive nonuse). These findings are consistent with those of previous studies. Thus, the potential increase in the number of adolescents with multiple sexual partners and the widespread adoption of high-risk behaviors cannot be ignored in China, given ongoing transformations in sexual norms and behaviors in the context of rapid social and economic changes. Meanwhile, although most Chinese parents supported sexuality education, very few parents had provided it [38]. More and more Chinese parents should be aware that strengthening communication on sexual issues could be a good way to reduce high-risk sexual behavior.

We also attempted to clarify the relationships between psychological factors and sexual behavior at the individual level. Adolescents with lower self-esteem reported more condom and contraceptive nonuse. Low self-esteem has often been associated with (risky) sexual behavior, particularly in adolescent females [14,18,19]. Several studies have found that depression is related to sexual experience, contraceptive nonuse, non-monogamous sexual partners, pregnancy, and STD history in adolescent females [20-22,39,40]. In this study, depression was associated with RSBs in adolescents. Impulsiveness has also been linked to RSBs, such as sexual activity under pressure or while drunk in female high-school students and multiple sexual partners and alcohol use before sex in both genders [16,17,41]. In this study, impulsiveness was a risk factor for RSB, including increased rates of condom and contraceptive nonuse.

This study provides up-to-date data about the prevalence of sexual behavior in Chinese adolescents and information useful for its prevention. The study had several limitations. Firstly, it did not include students in rural areas, weakening the generalizability of findings to all adolescents in China. Secondly, same-sex attraction and behavior were not measured in this study, while previous researches showed that adolescents with same-sex behavior have poorer mental health [42-44]. The percentage of adolescents with same-sex behavior and its related factor should be further investigated in China. Lastly, measures of target variables relied on self-reporting, and most RSB measures assessed sexual history rather than ongoing behavior. Although the temporal nature of relationships is difficult to determine in cross-sectional research, patterns may be clarified by separating historic from current behavior, examining generalized tendencies (e.g., self-esteem) separately from recent feelings (e.g., depressive symptoms), and adopting a longitudinal approach. Such research efforts would help to distinguish the psychological effects of RSBs and aid the design of interventions to reduce such behavior. In a word, a longitudinal model including both stable and short-term psychological factors and multiple measures of sexual behavior over time would provide much clarification of these complex issues.

Table 3: Psychological Measures According to Condom Use during Last Sexual Intercourse among Sexually Active Students.

  Condom Nonuse (n = 456) Condom Use (n = 205)
Subjective SES (province) 5.74 ± 1.92 5.89 ± 1.60
Subjective SES (school) 6.31 ± 1.82 6.99 ± 1.63**
BIS-11 72.59 ± 11.69 64.75 ± 9.84**
Self-Esteem Scale 17.61 ± 5.41 22.73 ± 4.92**
SSSCA_Parents 14.63 ± 2.25 13.27 ± 2.31*
SSSCA_Classmates 12.24 ± 2.68 11.98 ± 2.85
SSSCA_Friends 12.25 ± 3.75 10.72 ± 3.78*
SSSCA_Total 37.82 ± 6.78 36.23 ± 6.64
FES_Cohesion 10.82 ± 2.19 12.98 ± 2.01*
FES_Expressiveness 12. 00 ± 1.71 12. 18 ± 1.61
FES_Conflict 12.45 ± 2.47 11.62 ± 2.16
CES-D 22.78 ± 12.08 17.89 ± 8.92**
MASC 40.00 ± 20.61 37.74 ± 19.78
*p < 0·05, **p < 0·01 (two-tailed).
Abbreviations: SES: Socioeconomic Status; BIS-11: Barratt 
Impulsiveness Scale-11; SSSCA: Social Support Scale for Children 
and Adolescents; FES: Family Environment Scale; CES-D: Center For 
Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale; MASC: Multidimensional 
Anxiety Scale for Children

 

CONCLUSIONS

Our study findings reinforce the importance of programs to prevent RSBs among Chinese adolescents. Adolescence is a developmental period of experience seeking associated with intense feelings and arousal, resulting in non-optimal decision making when faced with requirements to control impulses and delay gratification. Adolescents’ impulsive propensities may be developmentally normative. They should thus be educated about the serious health risks associated with sexual behavior. Promising results have been achieved with sex education programs that include significant parental involvement [45-47].

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This study was supported by grants from the National Key Technologies R&D Program in the 11th 5-year plan of China (Grant No. 2009BAI77B02).

REFERENCES

1. Kalmuss D, Davidson A, Cohall A, Laraque D, Cassell C. Preventing sexual risk behaviors and pregnancy among teenagers: linking research and programs. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2003; 35: 87-93.

2. Gavin L, AP MacKay, K Brown, George Ryan. Sexual and reproductive health of persons aged 10-24 Years - United States, 2002-2007. Department of Health & Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2009; 58: 1-58.

3. Henshaw SK. Unintended pregnancy in the United States. Fam Plann Perspect. 1998; 30: 24-29, 46.

4. CDC. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance. 2011.

5. CDC. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Incidence, Prevalence, and Cost of Sexually Transmitted Infections in the United States. 2013.

6. GUO Ning-xiao, PAN Guo-xin, QIU Chun-ping, LIANG Jia-zhi (Haizhou District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangdong, 510288, China). Investigation on Health Risk Behaviors of Adolescents in Haizhu District of Guangzhou City. Occup and Health. 2011; 27: 1810-1815.

7. Song Y, CY Ji. Sexual intercourse and high-risk sexual behaviours among a national sample of urban adolescents in China. J Public Health (Oxf). 2010; 32: 312-321.

8. Zheng X, G Chen. Survey of Youth Access to Reproductive Health in China. Population & development. 2012; 16: 2-16.

9. Eaton DK, L Kann, Steve Kinchen, Shari Shanklin, Katherine H Flint, Joseph Hawkins, et al. Youth risk behavior surveillance-United States. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR). 2012; 61: 1-162.

10. Guo J, S Zhang. Sexual behavior before marriage and knowledge and need of contraception among college students in Beijing. Chin J Public Health. 2011. 27: 904-906.

11. China, NBoSo. Communique of the National Bureau of Statistics of People’s Republic of China on Major Figures of the 2010 Population Census. 2013.

12. Kogan SM, Brody GH, Chen YF, Grange CM, Slater LM, Di Clemente RJ, et al. Risk and protective factors for unprotected intercourse among rural African American young adults. Public Health Rep. 2010; 125: 709-717.

13. Larry K Brown, Ralph DiClemente, Richard Crosby, M Isabel Fernandez, David Pugatch, Sylvia Cohn, et al. Condom use among high-risk adolescents: anticipation of partner disapproval and less pleasure associated with not using condoms. Public Health Rep. 2008; 123: 601-607.

14. Goodson P, Buhi ER, Dunsmore SC. Self-esteem and adolescent sexual behaviors, attitudes, and intentions: a systematic review. J Adolesc Health. 2006; 38: 310-319.

15. Miller BC, MC Norton, Curtis T. The timing of sexual intercourse among adolescents family, peer, and other antecedents. Youth Soc. 1997; 29: 54-83.

16. Dir A, A Coskunpinar, Cyders MA. A meta-analytic review of the relationship between adolescent risky sexual behavior and impulsivity across gender, age, and race. Clin Psychol Rev. 2014; 34: 551-562.

17. Kahn JA, Kaplowitz RA, Goodman E, Emans SJ. The association between impulsiveness and sexual risk behaviors in adolescent and young adult women. J Adolesc Health. 2002; 30: 229-232.

18. Enejoh V, Pharr J, Mavegam BO, Olutola A, Karick H, et al. Impact of self esteem on risky sexual behaviors among Nigerian adolescents. AIDS Care. 2016; 28: 672-676.

19. Ethier KA, Kershaw TS, Lewis JB, Milan S, Niccolai LM, Ickovics JR, et al. Self-esteem, emotional distress and sexual behavior among adolescent females: inter-relationships and temporal effects. J Adolesc Health. 2006; 38: 268-274.

20. Brooks TL, Harris SK, Thrall JS, Woods ER. Association of adolescent risk behaviors with mental health symptoms in high school students. J Adolesc Health. 2002; 31: 240-246.

21. DiClemente RJ, Wingood GM, Crosby RA, Sionean C, Brown LK, Rothbaum B, et al. A prospective study of psychological distress and sexual risk behavior among black adolescent females. Pediatrics. 2001; 108: 85.

22. Shrier LA, Schillinger JA, Aneja P, Rice PA, Batteiger BE, Braslins PG, et al. Depressive symptoms and sexual risk behavior in young, chlamydia-infected, heterosexual dyads. J Adolesc Health. 2009; 45: 63-69.

23. Hu M, M Wang, L Cai. The application of the subjective socioeconomic status scale in Chinese adolescents. Chin J Clin Psychol. 2012; 20: 155- 161.

24. Brener ND, Kann L, Kinchen SA, Grunbaum JA, Whalen L, Eaton D, et al. Methodology of the youth risk behavior surveillance system. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2004; 53: 1-13.

25. Rosenberg M. Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.1965.

26. Yao S, H Yang, X Zhu. An examination of the psychometric properties of the chinese version of the barratt impulsiveness scale, 11th version in a sample of Chinese adolescents. Percept Mot Skills. 2007; 104: 1169-1182.

27. Harter S. Manual for the social support scale for children and adolescents. University of Denver. 1985.

28. Moos R, B Moos. Family Environment Scale Manual: Development, Applications, Research - Third Edition. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press. 1994.

29. Radloff L. The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement. Applied Psychological Measurement. 1977; 1: 385-401.

30. Wang M, Armour C, Wu Y, Ren F, Zhu X, Yao S, et al. Factor structure of the CES-D and measurement invariance across gender in Mainland Chinese adolescents. J Clin Psychol. 2013; 69: 966-979.

31. Yao S, Zou T, Zhu X, Abela JR, Auerbach RP, Tong X, et al. Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Multidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children Among Chinese Secondary School Students. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2007; 38: 1-16.

32. Schackman BR, Gebo KA, Walensky RP, Losina E, Muccio T, Sax PE, et al. The lifetime cost of current human immunodeficiency virus care in the United States. Med Care. 2006; 44: 990-997.

33. Weinstock HS, Berman, W Cates. Sexually transmitted diseases among American youth: incidence and prevalence estimates, 2000. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2004. 36: 6-10.

34. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Summary of notifiable diseases--United States, 2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2012; 59: 1-111.

35. Kost K, ZI Maddow. US Teenage Pregnancies, Births and Abortions, 2011: State Trends by Age, Race and Ethnicity. 2012.

36. Mmari K, RW Blum. Risk and protective factors that affect adolescent reproductive health in developing countries: a structured literature review. Glob Public Health. 2009; 4: 350-366.

37. Romer D, Black M, Ricardo I, Feigelman S, Kaljee L, Galbraith J , et al. Social influences on the sexual behavior of youth at risk for HIV exposure. Am J Public Health. 1994; 84: 977-985.

38. Liu W, KS Campen, CP Edwardsc. Chinese Parents Perspectives on Adolescent Sexuality Education. Int J Sex Health, 2011. 23: 224-236.

39. Alvy LM, McKirnan DJ, Mansergh G, Koblin B, Colfax GN, Flores SA, et al. Depression is associated with sexual risk among men who have sex with men, but is mediated by cognitive escape and self-efficacy. AIDS Behav. 2011; 15: 1171-1179.

40. Tull MT, KL Gratz. Major Depression and Risky Sexual Behavior among Substance Dependent Patients: The Moderating Roles of Distress Tolerance and Gender. Cognitive Therapy and Research. 2013; 37: 483-497.

41. Donohew L, Zimmerman RS, Cupp PS, Novak S, Colon S, Abell R, et al. Sensation seeking, impulsive decision-making and risky sex: implications for risk-taking and design of interventions. Personality and Individual Differences. 2000. 28: 1079-1091.

42. Ueno K. Same-sex experience and mental health during the transition between adolescence and young adulthood. The Sociological Quarterly. 2010. 51: 484-510.

43. Voyles CH, Sell RL. Continued disparities in lesbian, gay, and bisexual research funding at NIH. Am J Public Health. 2015; 105:1-2.

44. Zhang H, Wong WC, Ip P, Fan S, Yip PS. Health Status and Risk Behaviors of Sexual Minorities Among Chinese Adolescents: A School-Based Survey. J Homosex. 2017; 64: 382-396.

45. Doubova SV, C Infante-Castaneda, R Perez-Cuevas. Internet-based educational intervention to prevent risky sexual behaviors in Mexican adolescents: study protocol. BMC Public Health. 2016. 16: 343.

46. Gross TT, Laz TH, Rahman M, Berenson AB. Association between mother-child sexual communication and HPV vaccine uptake. Preve Med. 2015; 74: 63-66.

47. Klein JD, Sabaratnam P, Pazos B, Auerbach MM, Havens CG, Brach MJ, et al. Evaluation of the parents as primary sexuality educators program. J Adolesc Health. 2005; 37: 94-99.

Chen Y, Lei X, Yi J, Yao S (2017) Increasing High-Risk Sexual Behavior among Adolescents in 10 Cities of China. Ann Psychiatry Ment Health 5(3): 1100.

Received : 12 Feb 2017
Accepted : 05 Apr 2017
Published : 07 Apr 2017
Journals
Annals of Otolaryngology and Rhinology
ISSN : 2379-948X
Launched : 2014
JSM Schizophrenia
Launched : 2016
Journal of Nausea
Launched : 2020
JSM Internal Medicine
Launched : 2016
JSM Hepatitis
Launched : 2016
JSM Oro Facial Surgeries
ISSN : 2578-3211
Launched : 2016
Journal of Human Nutrition and Food Science
ISSN : 2333-6706
Launched : 2013
JSM Regenerative Medicine and Bioengineering
ISSN : 2379-0490
Launched : 2013
JSM Spine
ISSN : 2578-3181
Launched : 2016
Archives of Palliative Care
ISSN : 2573-1165
Launched : 2016
JSM Nutritional Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3203
Launched : 2017
Annals of Neurodegenerative Disorders
ISSN : 2476-2032
Launched : 2016
Journal of Fever
ISSN : 2641-7782
Launched : 2017
JSM Bone Marrow Research
ISSN : 2578-3351
Launched : 2016
JSM Mathematics and Statistics
ISSN : 2578-3173
Launched : 2014
Journal of Autoimmunity and Research
ISSN : 2573-1173
Launched : 2014
JSM Arthritis
ISSN : 2475-9155
Launched : 2016
JSM Head and Neck Cancer-Cases and Reviews
ISSN : 2573-1610
Launched : 2016
JSM General Surgery Cases and Images
ISSN : 2573-1564
Launched : 2016
JSM Anatomy and Physiology
ISSN : 2573-1262
Launched : 2016
JSM Dental Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1548
Launched : 2016
Annals of Emergency Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1017
Launched : 2016
Annals of Mens Health and Wellness
ISSN : 2641-7707
Launched : 2017
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Health Care
ISSN : 2576-0084
Launched : 2018
Journal of Chronic Diseases and Management
ISSN : 2573-1300
Launched : 2016
Annals of Vaccines and Immunization
ISSN : 2378-9379
Launched : 2014
JSM Heart Surgery Cases and Images
ISSN : 2578-3157
Launched : 2016
Annals of Reproductive Medicine and Treatment
ISSN : 2573-1092
Launched : 2016
JSM Brain Science
ISSN : 2573-1289
Launched : 2016
JSM Biomarkers
ISSN : 2578-3815
Launched : 2014
JSM Biology
ISSN : 2475-9392
Launched : 2016
Archives of Stem Cell and Research
ISSN : 2578-3580
Launched : 2014
Annals of Clinical and Medical Microbiology
ISSN : 2578-3629
Launched : 2014
JSM Pediatric Surgery
ISSN : 2578-3149
Launched : 2017
Journal of Memory Disorder and Rehabilitation
ISSN : 2578-319X
Launched : 2016
JSM Tropical Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2578-3165
Launched : 2016
JSM Head and Face Medicine
ISSN : 2578-3793
Launched : 2016
JSM Cardiothoracic Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1297
Launched : 2016
JSM Bone and Joint Diseases
ISSN : 2578-3351
Launched : 2017
JSM Bioavailability and Bioequivalence
ISSN : 2641-7812
Launched : 2017
JSM Atherosclerosis
ISSN : 2573-1270
Launched : 2016
Journal of Genitourinary Disorders
ISSN : 2641-7790
Launched : 2017
Journal of Fractures and Sprains
ISSN : 2578-3831
Launched : 2016
Journal of Autism and Epilepsy
ISSN : 2641-7774
Launched : 2016
Annals of Marine Biology and Research
ISSN : 2573-105X
Launched : 2014
JSM Health Education & Primary Health Care
ISSN : 2578-3777
Launched : 2016
JSM Communication Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3807
Launched : 2016
Annals of Musculoskeletal Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3599
Launched : 2016
Annals of Virology and Research
ISSN : 2573-1122
Launched : 2014
JSM Renal Medicine
ISSN : 2573-1637
Launched : 2016
Journal of Muscle Health
ISSN : 2578-3823
Launched : 2016
JSM Genetics and Genomics
ISSN : 2334-1823
Launched : 2013
JSM Anxiety and Depression
ISSN : 2475-9139
Launched : 2016
Clinical Journal of Heart Diseases
ISSN : 2641-7766
Launched : 2016
Annals of Medicinal Chemistry and Research
ISSN : 2378-9336
Launched : 2014
JSM Pain and Management
ISSN : 2578-3378
Launched : 2016
JSM Women's Health
ISSN : 2578-3696
Launched : 2016
Clinical Research in HIV or AIDS
ISSN : 2374-0094
Launched : 2013
Journal of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Obesity
ISSN : 2333-6692
Launched : 2013
Journal of Substance Abuse and Alcoholism
ISSN : 2373-9363
Launched : 2013
JSM Neurosurgery and Spine
ISSN : 2373-9479
Launched : 2013
Journal of Liver and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2379-0830
Launched : 2014
Journal of Drug Design and Research
ISSN : 2379-089X
Launched : 2014
JSM Clinical Oncology and Research
ISSN : 2373-938X
Launched : 2013
JSM Bioinformatics, Genomics and Proteomics
ISSN : 2576-1102
Launched : 2014
JSM Chemistry
ISSN : 2334-1831
Launched : 2013
Journal of Trauma and Care
ISSN : 2573-1246
Launched : 2014
JSM Surgical Oncology and Research
ISSN : 2578-3688
Launched : 2016
Annals of Food Processing and Preservation
ISSN : 2573-1033
Launched : 2016
Journal of Radiology and Radiation Therapy
ISSN : 2333-7095
Launched : 2013
JSM Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
ISSN : 2578-3572
Launched : 2016
Annals of Clinical Pathology
ISSN : 2373-9282
Launched : 2013
Annals of Cardiovascular Diseases
ISSN : 2641-7731
Launched : 2016
Journal of Behavior
ISSN : 2576-0076
Launched : 2016
Annals of Clinical and Experimental Metabolism
ISSN : 2572-2492
Launched : 2016
Clinical Research in Infectious Diseases
ISSN : 2379-0636
Launched : 2013
JSM Microbiology
ISSN : 2333-6455
Launched : 2013
Journal of Urology and Research
ISSN : 2379-951X
Launched : 2014
Journal of Family Medicine and Community Health
ISSN : 2379-0547
Launched : 2013
Annals of Pregnancy and Care
ISSN : 2578-336X
Launched : 2017
JSM Cell and Developmental Biology
ISSN : 2379-061X
Launched : 2013
Annals of Aquaculture and Research
ISSN : 2379-0881
Launched : 2014
Clinical Research in Pulmonology
ISSN : 2333-6625
Launched : 2013
Journal of Immunology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2333-6714
Launched : 2013
Annals of Forensic Research and Analysis
ISSN : 2378-9476
Launched : 2014
JSM Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
ISSN : 2333-7109
Launched : 2013
Annals of Breast Cancer Research
ISSN : 2641-7685
Launched : 2016
Annals of Gerontology and Geriatric Research
ISSN : 2378-9409
Launched : 2014
Journal of Sleep Medicine and Disorders
ISSN : 2379-0822
Launched : 2014
JSM Burns and Trauma
ISSN : 2475-9406
Launched : 2016
Chemical Engineering and Process Techniques
ISSN : 2333-6633
Launched : 2013
Annals of Clinical Cytology and Pathology
ISSN : 2475-9430
Launched : 2014
JSM Allergy and Asthma
ISSN : 2573-1254
Launched : 2016
Journal of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
ISSN : 2334-2307
Launched : 2013
Annals of Sports Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2379-0571
Launched : 2014
JSM Sexual Medicine
ISSN : 2578-3718
Launched : 2016
Annals of Vascular Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2378-9344
Launched : 2014
JSM Biotechnology and Biomedical Engineering
ISSN : 2333-7117
Launched : 2013
Journal of Hematology and Transfusion
ISSN : 2333-6684
Launched : 2013
JSM Environmental Science and Ecology
ISSN : 2333-7141
Launched : 2013
Journal of Cardiology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2333-6676
Launched : 2013
JSM Nanotechnology and Nanomedicine
ISSN : 2334-1815
Launched : 2013
Journal of Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders
ISSN : 2475-9473
Launched : 2016
JSM Ophthalmology
ISSN : 2333-6447
Launched : 2013
Journal of Pharmacology and Clinical Toxicology
ISSN : 2333-7079
Launched : 2013
Medical Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
ISSN : 2333-6439
Launched : 2013
Annals of Pediatrics and Child Health
ISSN : 2373-9312
Launched : 2013
JSM Clinical Pharmaceutics
ISSN : 2379-9498
Launched : 2014
JSM Foot and Ankle
ISSN : 2475-9112
Launched : 2016
JSM Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementia
ISSN : 2378-9565
Launched : 2014
Journal of Addiction Medicine and Therapy
ISSN : 2333-665X
Launched : 2013
Journal of Veterinary Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2378-931X
Launched : 2013
Annals of Public Health and Research
ISSN : 2378-9328
Launched : 2014
Annals of Orthopedics and Rheumatology
ISSN : 2373-9290
Launched : 2013
Journal of Clinical Nephrology and Research
ISSN : 2379-0652
Launched : 2014
Annals of Community Medicine and Practice
ISSN : 2475-9465
Launched : 2014
Annals of Biometrics and Biostatistics
ISSN : 2374-0116
Launched : 2013
JSM Clinical Case Reports
ISSN : 2373-9819
Launched : 2013
Journal of Cancer Biology and Research
ISSN : 2373-9436
Launched : 2013
Journal of Surgery and Transplantation Science
ISSN : 2379-0911
Launched : 2013
Journal of Dermatology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2373-9371
Launched : 2013
JSM Gastroenterology and Hepatology
ISSN : 2373-9487
Launched : 2013
Annals of Nursing and Practice
ISSN : 2379-9501
Launched : 2014
JSM Dentistry
ISSN : 2333-7133
Launched : 2013
Author Information X