Loading

Annals of Psychiatry and Mental Health

Prevalence of Borderline Personality Disorder among Syrian Private University Students, A Cross-Sectional Study

Research Article | Open Access | Volume 12 | Issue 3

  • 1. Department of Internal Medicine, Damascus University, Syria
  • 2. Graduate Student, Faculty of Medicine, Syrian Private University, Syria
+ Show More - Show Less
Corresponding Authors
Haidar Yousef, Master’s Degree Student, Department of Internal Medicine, Damascus University, Damascus, Syria, Tel: 009639362980
Abstract

Background: Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is characterized by changes in self- image and interpersonal relationships that are characterized by sudden shifts between idealization (overly positive views of self and others), and devaluation (overly negative views of self and others). People with borderline personality disorder typically suffers from anxiety, irritability, and affective disorder as well as impulsive behaviors related to spending (Profusion), sexual activity, drugs abuse, or polyphagia. Borderline personality disorder affects approximately 0.7–2.7% of adults.

Purpose: The aim of this study is to assess the prevalence of borderline personality disorder (BPD) among undergraduate students at the Syrian Private University (SPU), Damascus, Syria, where we seek to diagnose the presence of the disorder in addition to studying the impact of many factors whether those related to childhood or adulthood, from environmental, material, emotional, family and even academic conditions, and studying the manifestations that are common in this group of students

Methods: After obtaining approval from the Deanship of the Faculty of Medicine and the Ethics Committee at the Syrian Private University SPU, We designed an electronic questionnaire and distributed it randomly among students with informed consent from the participating student in a mandatory option to participate in the questionnaire. The questionnaire did not include any personal information referring to the participating student, but rather demographic data and variables related to our study. We designed the questionnaire and distributed it among students in the period between 5/1/2024 - 10/1/2024 and obtained 250 participating students, we excluded 30 students for not completing the questionnaire optimally and selected 220 students.

Results: We found a statistically significant association between the incidence of the Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD).

KEYWORDS
  • Borderline Personal Disorder; Temperament; Family problems; Emotional problems; Financial problems; Symptoms; Mansion
CITATION

Yousef H, Kharfan B, Mhanna FA, Latifeh Y (2024) Prevalence of Borderline Personality Disorder among Syrian Private University Students, A Cross-Sectional Study. Ann Psychiatry Ment Health 12(3): 1197.

INTRODUCTION

Personality disorders are often recognized in adolescence and persist throughout most of adult life, whereas it is uncommon for personality disorders to be diagnosed in patients younger than 18 years of age due to the ongoing physiological changes that accompany puberty and growth. However, if the disorder is clear and meet the diagnostic criteria and is not limited to puberty, then the diagnosis of borderline personality disorder BPD in children and adults is appropriate [1].

Historically, borderline personality disorder was viewed as the borderline between psychosis and which was previously called “neurosis”, was previously called “pseudo-schizophrenia” because its symptoms combine both. It was also called “borderline” because its diagnosis and treatment are limited. This personality is twice as common in women as in men, and is more common in families of depressed and addicted people.

According to the World Health Organization, it is an emotionally unstable personality because it is unstable in terms of mood, emotions, or social relationships [1]. It is characterized by noticeable instability in performance, emotion, mood, and personal relationships, and sometimes in reality. About 20-50% of patients with borderline personality disorder suffer from psychotic and mood symptoms, meaning that most patients with borderline personality disorder suffer from a mood swing, short- term puerperal episodes, sudden outbursts of anger, addiction, and polyphagia, sudden severance of personal relationships, multiple emotional and sexual relationships (in western countries), and constant blaming of others for not understanding their suffering and depression, and repeated attempts at self- harm, body mutilation, and even suicide.

Symptoms of borderline personality disorder usually appear in late adolescence, but some cases have been diagnosed in children and initial diagnosis is rarely made in patients over the age of forty, although The incidence of this disorder tends to decrease after the age of forty, because personality disorders often decrease with age and because some people with the disorder commit suicide and thus are no longer part of the population. Studies of borderline personality disorder have revealed that the diagnosis was more common in females than in males, with the female to male ratio 4:1, and there is no evidence suggest a relationship between race and diagnosis of borderline personality disorder or borderline disorders in childhood.

METHODS

After obtaining approval from the Deanship of the Faculty of Medicine and the Ethics Committee at the Syrian Private University (SPU), we designed an electronic questionnaire and distributed it among students randomly with informed consent from the participating student in a mandatory option to participate in the questionnaire. The questionnaire did not include any personal information referring to the participating student, but rather demographic data and variables related to our study. We designed the questionnaire and distributed it among students in the period between 5/1/2024 -10/1/2024 and obtained 250 participating students. We excluded 30 students for not completing the questionnaire optimally and selected 220 students.

We insert the results on Microsoft Excel 2019 and conducted the necessary statistical analysis using the SPSS using the Chi- Square measure to study the associations between qualitative variables. The statistical significance level of 0.05 was relied upon to estimate the differences and relationships, so that if the P-Value is greater than 0.05, there are no fundamental differences and the differences are not statistically significant, while values less than 0.05 indicate that the differences are statistically significant and values less than 0.01 indicate a high level of statistical significance. The diagnosis of borderline personality disorder is based on criteria DSM-5, Mclean Screening Instrument for BPD, Borderline Symptom List (BSL-23).

RESULTS

Percentage of Affected People

Of the 220 male and female students who participated in the study, we found that 54.54% of the Student have diagnosed with borderline personality disorder, where a diagnosis was made when at least 5 of the automated manifestations were confirmed in the questionnaire (Table 1).

Table 1: Percentage of Students

Number of sample students

Number of affected students in the sample

Percentage of affected students

220

120

54.45%

Age groups

The largest proportion of participants in the sample were 25 years old (36.36%), The remaining percentages were distributed similarly in the age groups 24, 23, 22, 21, 20,19 years. No student at the age of 18 years participated, and the average age in the sample was 23.05 years.

As for affected students, the minimum age was 21 years, and the average age was 23.5 years, and the largest percentage of cases was distributed at the age of 24 years 33.33%. By conducting the statistical correlation equation and comparing the result with the tabulated values at a significance level of 0.05 and a degree of freedom of 7, we found that there is a statistically significant correlation between the incidence of the disorder and age (Table 2).

Table 2: Age Groups of The Sample.

Percentage (For affected students)

Number of affected

 

Percentage

Number of students

 

The Age

0%

0

0%

0

18 years

0%

0

4.54%

10

19 years

0%

0

9.09%

20

20 years

8.33%

10

9.09%

20

21 years

16.66%

20

13.63%

30

22 years

16.66%

20

9.09%

20

23 years

33.33%

40

9.09%

20

24 years

25.0%

30

36.36%

80

25 years

100%

120

100%

220

Total

23.5?1.2

Average age of affected students

23.05?1.9

Average age of sample

0.025

P-Value

55.71

Chi-Square

P = 0.025 < 0.05. There is a statistically significant relationship

between age and the incidence of borderline personality disorder.

Significance

Gender

As for the study sample, the percentage of male participants was greater than the percentage of females (54.54% and 45.45%, respectively), while the distribution of the disorder was greater among females than males at a rate of 2:1 (66.66% and 33.33%,respectively), and we found at the significance level of 0.05 and the degree of freedom 1, a statistically significant association between the incidence of Borderline Personality Disorder and gender, with a predominance of the incidence among females compared tomales 1:2 (Table 3).

Table 3: Gender.

Percentage (For affected students)

Number of affected students

 

Percentage

Number of students

 

Sex

33.33%

30

54.54%

120

Male

66.66%

60

45.45%

100

Female

100.00

120

100.00%

220

Total

0.01

P-Value

27.63

Chi-Square

P = 0.01 < 0.05. There is a statistically significant relationship between gender and the incidence of borderline personality disorder.

 

Significance

University Status

The largest percentage of students participating in the study are Syrians residing in the country (75.45%), followed by Syrians not residing in the country (22.72%) and a small number of Arab and foreign students (0.915%) For each of them.

As for borderline personality disorder, the highest percentage was among Syrian residents (83.33% Of the cases) at a rate of 66% among the total number of resident Syrian students, while 15.05% Of the affected students, the majority were among non- resident Syrians (54% of all non-resident Syrian students), followed by scholarship students and Arabs, who occupied the lowest percentage (0.81%) Of the total affected cases (50% of both groups).

By studying the correlation coefficients at the significance level of 0.05 and the degree of freedom of 3, it was found that there is a statistically significant correlation between the university admission status and the presence of borderline personality disorder among students (Table 4).

Table 4: University Status.

Percentage (For affected students)

Number of affected

 

percentage

Number of students

 

The Situation

83.33%

100

75.45%

166

Resident Syrian

15.05%

18

22.72%

50

Non-Resident Syrian

0.81%

1

0.915%

2

Arabs and Foreigners

0.81%

1

0.915%

2

Scholarships

100%

120

100%

220

The Total

0.05

P-Value

24.191

Chi-Square

P = 0.05 = 0.05 --> There is a statistically significant relationship between having the disorder and the students’ status in terms of the quality of university admission.

 

Significance

Financial Status

The majority of the study participants were students with very good to excellent financial status (42.27% - 40.45%, respectively), and 11.36% of the participants were financially good, while a small percentage of the participants were financially poor and required work to cover their study and living expenses 5.9%.

As for the presence of borderline personality disorder, it was 47.5% of affected participants were in an excellent financial situation (64% of the total), 30.83% were in very good financial condition (39% of the total) and 14.16% were in good financial condition (68% of the total) and 7.5% were in poor financial status (69% of the total).

By studying the correlation coefficients at the significance level of 0.05 and a degree of freedom of 3, we found a relationship between financial status and borderline personality disorder, but it was not statistically significant (Table 5).

Table 5: Financial Status.

Percentage (For affected students)

Number of affected students

 

Percentage

Number of Students

Financial Status

47.5%

57

40.45%

89

Excellent

30.83%

37

42.27%

93

Very good

14.16%

17

11.36%

25

Good

7.5%

9

5.9%

13

Weak

100%

120

100%

220

Total

 

Very good

Average financial status of the affected students

 

Very good

Average financial status

0.975

P-Value

13,988

Chi-Square

P = 0.975 > 0.05. There is a relationship between financial status and borderline personality disorder, but it is not statistically significant.

 

Significance

Housing

Most of the students participating in the study live with their family (81.81%), and 10.45% live in dormitory with their colleagues, and the smaller percentage of participating students do not share housing with anyone and live alone (7.72%).

Most of the affected were those living with their families 79.36% (55% of the total), while a smaller percentage were living in dormitory with their colleagues 11.66% (60% of the total) and a small percentage were living alone 5% (35% of the total).

By studying the correlation coefficients at the significance level of 0.05 and the degree of freedom of 2, we find a relationship between the residential environment and the incidence of borderline personality disorder, but the results here are not statistically significant (Table 6).

Table 6. Housing.

Percentage (affected students)

Number of affected students

 

Percentage

Number of students

 

79.36%

100

81.81%

180

With family

11.66%

14

10.45%

23

Dormitory

5.00%

6

7.72%

17

Alone

100.00%

120

100.00%

220

Total

With family

For the affected

Live with family

Sample mean

0.025

P-Value

55.71

Chi-Square

P = 0.995 > 0.05?There is a relationship between the student's residential environment and the incidence of borderline personality disorder, but it is not statistically significant.

 

Significance

Having Family Problems

The majority of students participating in the study did not have family problems 50.0%, and there were problems with 40.9% of the participants. 65.83% of affected students had family problems and 34.16% their relationship with their family was good, and can be said in another way that 87% of the students who had family problems had borderline personality disorder while 37% of the students who did not have problems with their families had borderline personality disorder.

By studying the correlation coefficients at the significance level of 0.05 and the degree of freedom of 2, we find a statistically significant relationship between the presence of family problems and the incidence of borderline personality disorder (Table 7).

Table 7: Presence of Family Problems.

Percentage (For affected students)

Number of affected students

 

Percentage

Number of students

 

65.83%

79

40.9%

90

Yes

34.16%

41

50.0%

110

No

0.0%

0

9.1%

20

Maybe

100%

120

100%

220

Total

There is

Average for affected students

nothing

Average

0.02

P-Value

67.37

Chi-Square

P = 0.02 < 0.05. There is a statistically significant relationship between the presence of family problems and the incidence of borderline personality disorder.

 

Significance

Having a History of Separation from the Partner

Problems that led to early separation were found in 61.81% of the students participating in the study, however, the diagnosis were found in 50.7% of these students only, the percentage of affected students who suffering from early separation problems was about 57.5%.

By studying the correlation coefficients, we found a relationship between the presence of early separation problems with the partner and borderline personality disorder, but the results in our sample were not statistically significant (Table 8).

Table 8. History of Separation From Partner.

Percentage (For affected students)

Number of affected students

 

Percentage

Number of students

 

57.5%

69

61.81%

136

Yes

42.5%

51

38.18%

84

No

100%

120

100%

220

Total

There are problems

Average for affected students

There are problems

Sample average

0.975

P-Value

2.07

Chi-Square

P = 0.975 > 0.05. There is a relationship between a history of separation from a partner and the occurrence of borderline personality disorder, but it is not statistically significant.

 

Significance

Emotional Status

The majority of students participating in the study were single (70.9%), and 21.36% of the students were in a relationship and 4.54% of them reached the engagement stage and 3.2% of students were in a marriage relationship.

For affected students, 92.5% were single in the current situation while 5.83% were in a relationship and a small percentage were engaged or married (0.835% and 0.835%, respectively).

By studying the correlation coefficients at the significance level of 0.05 and the degree of freedom of 3, we found a statistically significant relationship between the emotional state of students and the current emotional state (Table 9).

Table 9: Emotional Status.

Percentage

(For affected students)

Number

of affected students

 

Percentage

Number of students

 

92.5%

111

70.9%

156

Single

5.83%

7

21.36%

47

In a

relationships

0.835%

1

4.54%

10

Engaged

0.835%

1

3.2%

7

Married

100%

120

100%

220

Total

Single students

Average affected

Single students

Sample mean

0.005

P-Value

58.96

Chi-Square

P = 0.005 < 0.05. There is a statistically significant relationship

between emotional state and borderline personality disorder.

Significance

Quality of Life

We found that the majority of students participating in the study rated their quality of life as 70% and Most of the patients found that their quality of life was between 40-80% while the non-affected students selected values between 70 – 100% (Figure 1).

Figure 1 Percentage of Students.

Figure 1: Quality of Life.

Spread of demonstrations among students

We find that the majority of participating students did not suffer from any of these manifestations, and the most common of these manifestations were: I suffered from shame, afraid of losing control, mood swings, and loneliness. (Figure 2).

 Figure 2 Spread of demonstrations among students

Figure 2: Spread of demonstrations among students

DISCUSSION

Through our study, we found a significant incidence of borderline personality disorder among students of the Syrian Private University, at a rate of 54.54%, and the diagnosis was made according to the criteria mentioned above.

As for the distribution of BPD by age: the largest percentage of those AFFECTED STUDENTS were 24-25 years old (33.33%, 25%, respectively), with an average age of infection of 23.5 years. By studying the statistical correlation equations, we found a statistically significant association between age and suffering from borderline personality disorder.

Compared to a study conducted by the researcher and physician Eric A. Fertuck We found a significant difference in the results between the two studies, as the average age of those affected in the Viatuck study was 32.1 years. This difference in the results is due to the difference in the institution and the nature of the samples. In our study, we investigated the presence of the disorder among undergraduate students, while in the Viatuck study, samples of patients diagnosed and admitted to the hospital were included. It is worth noting that although the onset of this disorder is associated with puberty, it is rarely diagnosed and a psychiatrist is consulted for it at this stage because the vast majority of cases recover spontaneously within a few years, and the remaining percentage that remains under the influence of the disorder consults the doctor and is admitted to the hospital. The majority of this group of people are between the ages of 30 and 40 years.

Regarding the distribution of BPD by gender, the greater proportion of affected people were females compared to males at a rate of 1:2 (66.66%, 33.33%, respectively), and we found a statistically significant association between infection and gender.

Compared to the study of Viatok, we found agreement between our results and the results of his study, as Viatok found a tendency for occurrence in females compared to males, but at a higher ratio (1:5), while in our study it was 1:2. According to what Viatok mentioned in another section of his study, he noticed during follow-up over twenty years that the rates of spontaneous recovery were more prevalent among males, and this may explain the increase in the ratio in the study of Viatok with the advanced ages included in his study.

As for the university situation, the largest percentage of those affected was among the Syrian resident students (83.33% of the cases), while 15.05% of the affected were among the non- resident Syrian students, and the lowest percentage was among the Arab and foreign students and scholarship students (0.81% for each). We found a statistically significant association between the distribution of borderline personality disorder and the type of university admission for the student, perhaps due to the association of the type of university admission with the student’s living environment in terms of material and family relations. We will not find anything that corresponds to this aspect of the study in the medical literature to compare the results.

Regarding the financial status, the majority of the students participating in the study were students with excellent financial status (64%), while the disorder was seen in a smaller percentage of students with very good financial status (30.83%), and the symptoms appeared less among students with good to poor financial status. There was a correlation, but not statistically significant, between the financial status and the incidence of borderline personality disorder.

Regarding housing, most of the affected students were living with their families (79.36%), while a smaller percentage of affected students were living with their university dorm mates (11.66%), and a small percentage were living alone (5%). We found a relation, but it was not statistically significant, between the housing environment and the incidence of borderline personality disorder.

As for the presence of problems in the family, there were family problems in the largest percentage of those affected students (65.83%), while there was no significant occurence of the disorder in terms of the severity of symptoms among students who enjoy good family relationships. We found that there is a statistically significant association between the infection and the presence of family problems in the student.

In comparison with other studies regarding the above- mentioned family-related risk factors, it was found that Cohen et al found that low socioeconomic background predicted BPD symptoms and that this effect remained stable over time [2]. Crawford and colleagues reached the same conclusion [3].This was confirmed by three studies by Stiep et al., which showed that poverty requiring public assistance may predispose to the onset of BPD symptoms during adolescence [4,5].

Another aspect to consider is the relation between parents and children in childhood, as it was conducted Steel et al in 2019 reviewed a fairly recent systematic review of medical literature on the impact of parenting on the development of personality disorders. They analyzed eight systematic reviews and five of these reviews found that cold relationships of low warmth, rejection, strict control, and negative affectivity emanating from the mother were a psychosocial risk factor for the development of borderline personality disorder [6-8].

As for the presence of emotional problems and a history of early separation from the partner, we found that in the largest percentage of those affected (57.5%), but the results were not statistically significant and could be relied upon based on our sample. The majority of students with borderline personality disorder were single (92.5%), while a small percentage were in stable emotional relationships (5.83%). There were emotional relationships that led to marriage among students with borderline personality disorder (0.835%). These results are statistically significant and could be relied upon because there is a relationship between the emotional state and the current emotional state.

Although Wingenfeld et al., found no significant differences in emotional reaction time between individuals with BPD and controls, except that the BPD group was generally slower [9]. They also suggested that there is a negative bias in emotion recognition, meaning that individuals with BPD appear to be biased toward identifying negative emotions in others [10,11]. This may have a significant impact on the affected person’s relationships, especially romantic relationships with a partner, and lead to early separation [12].

As for the quality of life, the majority of the students participating in the study rated their quality of life at 70%, and most of the affected students determined their quality of life as ranging between 40-80%, while the non-affected people chose values ranging between 70-100%, on the basis that 0% is a very poor quality of life in various aspects and shows the student’s dissatisfaction with his life and situation, while 50% is the average case and 100% is the excellent case that reflects the student’s complete satisfaction with his life.

REFERENCES
  1. Eric A, Fertuck. The Specificity of mental pain in borderline personality disorder. Research Article. 2016.
  2. Crawford TN, Cohen PR, Chen H, Anglin DM, Ehrensaft M. Early maternal separation and the trajectory of borderline personality disorder symptoms. Dev Psychopathol. 2009; 21: 1013-1030.
  3. Stepp SD, Scott LN, Jones NP, Whalen DJ, Hipwell AE. Negative emotional reactivity as a marker of vulnerability in the development of borderline personality disorder symptoms. Dev Psychopathol. 2015; 28: 213-224.
  4. Stepp SD, Whalen DJ, Scott LN, Zalewski M, Loeber R, Hipwell AE. Reciprocal effects of parenting and borderline personality disorder symptoms in adolescent girls. Dev Psychopathol. 2014; 26: 361-378.
  5. Stepp SD, Lazarus SA, Byrd AL. A systematic review of risk factors prospectively associated with borderline personality disorder: Taking stock and moving forward. Pers Disord Theory Res Treat. 2016; 7: 316-323.
  6. Ibrahim J, Cosgrave N, Woolgar M. Childhood maltreatment and its link to borderline personality disorder features in children: A systematic review approach. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2018; 23: 57-76.
  7. Winsper C, Lereya ST, Marwaha S, Thompson A, Eyden J, Singh SP. The aetiological and psychopathological validity of borderline personality disorder in youth: A systematic review and meta- analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2016; 44: 13-24.
  8. Wingenfeld K, Rullkoetter N, Mensebach C, Beblo T, Mertens M, Kreisel S, et al. Neural correlates of the individual emotional Stroop in borderline personality disorder. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2009; 34: 571-586.
  9. Domes G, Schulze L, Herpertz SC. Emotion recognition in borderline personality disorder-a review of the literature. J Pers Disord. 2009; 23: 6-19.
  10. Domes G, Czieschnek D, Weidler F, Berger C, Fast K, Herpertz SC. Recognition of facial affect in borderline personality disorder. J Pers Disord. 2008; 22: 135-147.
  11. Wagner AW, Linehan MM. Facial expression recognition ability among women with borderline personality disorder: Implications for emotion regulation? J Pers Disord. 1999; 13: 329-344.
  12. Koenigsberg HW, Siever LJ, Lee H, Pizzarello S, New AS, Goodman M, et al. Neural correlates of emotion processing in borderline personality disorder. Psychiatry Res. 2009; 172: 192-199.

Yousef H, Kharfan B, Mhanna FA, Latifeh Y (2024) Prevalence of Borderline Personality Disorder among Syrian Private University Students, A Cross-Sectional Study. Ann Psychiatry Ment Health 12(3): 1197.

Received : 04 Nov 2024
Accepted : 26 Nov 2024
Published : 28 Nov 2024
Journals
Annals of Otolaryngology and Rhinology
ISSN : 2379-948X
Launched : 2014
JSM Schizophrenia
Launched : 2016
Journal of Nausea
Launched : 2020
JSM Internal Medicine
Launched : 2016
JSM Hepatitis
Launched : 2016
JSM Oro Facial Surgeries
ISSN : 2578-3211
Launched : 2016
Journal of Human Nutrition and Food Science
ISSN : 2333-6706
Launched : 2013
JSM Regenerative Medicine and Bioengineering
ISSN : 2379-0490
Launched : 2013
JSM Spine
ISSN : 2578-3181
Launched : 2016
Archives of Palliative Care
ISSN : 2573-1165
Launched : 2016
JSM Nutritional Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3203
Launched : 2017
Annals of Neurodegenerative Disorders
ISSN : 2476-2032
Launched : 2016
Journal of Fever
ISSN : 2641-7782
Launched : 2017
JSM Bone Marrow Research
ISSN : 2578-3351
Launched : 2016
JSM Mathematics and Statistics
ISSN : 2578-3173
Launched : 2014
Journal of Autoimmunity and Research
ISSN : 2573-1173
Launched : 2014
JSM Arthritis
ISSN : 2475-9155
Launched : 2016
JSM Head and Neck Cancer-Cases and Reviews
ISSN : 2573-1610
Launched : 2016
JSM General Surgery Cases and Images
ISSN : 2573-1564
Launched : 2016
JSM Anatomy and Physiology
ISSN : 2573-1262
Launched : 2016
JSM Dental Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1548
Launched : 2016
Annals of Emergency Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1017
Launched : 2016
Annals of Mens Health and Wellness
ISSN : 2641-7707
Launched : 2017
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Health Care
ISSN : 2576-0084
Launched : 2018
Journal of Chronic Diseases and Management
ISSN : 2573-1300
Launched : 2016
Annals of Vaccines and Immunization
ISSN : 2378-9379
Launched : 2014
JSM Heart Surgery Cases and Images
ISSN : 2578-3157
Launched : 2016
Annals of Reproductive Medicine and Treatment
ISSN : 2573-1092
Launched : 2016
JSM Brain Science
ISSN : 2573-1289
Launched : 2016
JSM Biomarkers
ISSN : 2578-3815
Launched : 2014
JSM Biology
ISSN : 2475-9392
Launched : 2016
Archives of Stem Cell and Research
ISSN : 2578-3580
Launched : 2014
Annals of Clinical and Medical Microbiology
ISSN : 2578-3629
Launched : 2014
JSM Pediatric Surgery
ISSN : 2578-3149
Launched : 2017
Journal of Memory Disorder and Rehabilitation
ISSN : 2578-319X
Launched : 2016
JSM Tropical Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2578-3165
Launched : 2016
JSM Head and Face Medicine
ISSN : 2578-3793
Launched : 2016
JSM Cardiothoracic Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1297
Launched : 2016
JSM Bone and Joint Diseases
ISSN : 2578-3351
Launched : 2017
JSM Bioavailability and Bioequivalence
ISSN : 2641-7812
Launched : 2017
JSM Atherosclerosis
ISSN : 2573-1270
Launched : 2016
Journal of Genitourinary Disorders
ISSN : 2641-7790
Launched : 2017
Journal of Fractures and Sprains
ISSN : 2578-3831
Launched : 2016
Journal of Autism and Epilepsy
ISSN : 2641-7774
Launched : 2016
Annals of Marine Biology and Research
ISSN : 2573-105X
Launched : 2014
JSM Health Education & Primary Health Care
ISSN : 2578-3777
Launched : 2016
JSM Communication Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3807
Launched : 2016
Annals of Musculoskeletal Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3599
Launched : 2016
Annals of Virology and Research
ISSN : 2573-1122
Launched : 2014
JSM Renal Medicine
ISSN : 2573-1637
Launched : 2016
Journal of Muscle Health
ISSN : 2578-3823
Launched : 2016
JSM Genetics and Genomics
ISSN : 2334-1823
Launched : 2013
JSM Anxiety and Depression
ISSN : 2475-9139
Launched : 2016
Clinical Journal of Heart Diseases
ISSN : 2641-7766
Launched : 2016
Annals of Medicinal Chemistry and Research
ISSN : 2378-9336
Launched : 2014
JSM Pain and Management
ISSN : 2578-3378
Launched : 2016
JSM Women's Health
ISSN : 2578-3696
Launched : 2016
Clinical Research in HIV or AIDS
ISSN : 2374-0094
Launched : 2013
Journal of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Obesity
ISSN : 2333-6692
Launched : 2013
Journal of Substance Abuse and Alcoholism
ISSN : 2373-9363
Launched : 2013
JSM Neurosurgery and Spine
ISSN : 2373-9479
Launched : 2013
Journal of Liver and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2379-0830
Launched : 2014
Journal of Drug Design and Research
ISSN : 2379-089X
Launched : 2014
JSM Clinical Oncology and Research
ISSN : 2373-938X
Launched : 2013
JSM Bioinformatics, Genomics and Proteomics
ISSN : 2576-1102
Launched : 2014
JSM Chemistry
ISSN : 2334-1831
Launched : 2013
Journal of Trauma and Care
ISSN : 2573-1246
Launched : 2014
JSM Surgical Oncology and Research
ISSN : 2578-3688
Launched : 2016
Annals of Food Processing and Preservation
ISSN : 2573-1033
Launched : 2016
Journal of Radiology and Radiation Therapy
ISSN : 2333-7095
Launched : 2013
JSM Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
ISSN : 2578-3572
Launched : 2016
Annals of Clinical Pathology
ISSN : 2373-9282
Launched : 2013
Annals of Cardiovascular Diseases
ISSN : 2641-7731
Launched : 2016
Journal of Behavior
ISSN : 2576-0076
Launched : 2016
Annals of Clinical and Experimental Metabolism
ISSN : 2572-2492
Launched : 2016
Clinical Research in Infectious Diseases
ISSN : 2379-0636
Launched : 2013
JSM Microbiology
ISSN : 2333-6455
Launched : 2013
Journal of Urology and Research
ISSN : 2379-951X
Launched : 2014
Journal of Family Medicine and Community Health
ISSN : 2379-0547
Launched : 2013
Annals of Pregnancy and Care
ISSN : 2578-336X
Launched : 2017
JSM Cell and Developmental Biology
ISSN : 2379-061X
Launched : 2013
Annals of Aquaculture and Research
ISSN : 2379-0881
Launched : 2014
Clinical Research in Pulmonology
ISSN : 2333-6625
Launched : 2013
Journal of Immunology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2333-6714
Launched : 2013
Annals of Forensic Research and Analysis
ISSN : 2378-9476
Launched : 2014
JSM Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
ISSN : 2333-7109
Launched : 2013
Annals of Breast Cancer Research
ISSN : 2641-7685
Launched : 2016
Annals of Gerontology and Geriatric Research
ISSN : 2378-9409
Launched : 2014
Journal of Sleep Medicine and Disorders
ISSN : 2379-0822
Launched : 2014
JSM Burns and Trauma
ISSN : 2475-9406
Launched : 2016
Chemical Engineering and Process Techniques
ISSN : 2333-6633
Launched : 2013
Annals of Clinical Cytology and Pathology
ISSN : 2475-9430
Launched : 2014
JSM Allergy and Asthma
ISSN : 2573-1254
Launched : 2016
Journal of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
ISSN : 2334-2307
Launched : 2013
Annals of Sports Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2379-0571
Launched : 2014
JSM Sexual Medicine
ISSN : 2578-3718
Launched : 2016
Annals of Vascular Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2378-9344
Launched : 2014
JSM Biotechnology and Biomedical Engineering
ISSN : 2333-7117
Launched : 2013
Journal of Hematology and Transfusion
ISSN : 2333-6684
Launched : 2013
JSM Environmental Science and Ecology
ISSN : 2333-7141
Launched : 2013
Journal of Cardiology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2333-6676
Launched : 2013
JSM Nanotechnology and Nanomedicine
ISSN : 2334-1815
Launched : 2013
Journal of Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders
ISSN : 2475-9473
Launched : 2016
JSM Ophthalmology
ISSN : 2333-6447
Launched : 2013
Journal of Pharmacology and Clinical Toxicology
ISSN : 2333-7079
Launched : 2013
Medical Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
ISSN : 2333-6439
Launched : 2013
Annals of Pediatrics and Child Health
ISSN : 2373-9312
Launched : 2013
JSM Clinical Pharmaceutics
ISSN : 2379-9498
Launched : 2014
JSM Foot and Ankle
ISSN : 2475-9112
Launched : 2016
JSM Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementia
ISSN : 2378-9565
Launched : 2014
Journal of Addiction Medicine and Therapy
ISSN : 2333-665X
Launched : 2013
Journal of Veterinary Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2378-931X
Launched : 2013
Annals of Public Health and Research
ISSN : 2378-9328
Launched : 2014
Annals of Orthopedics and Rheumatology
ISSN : 2373-9290
Launched : 2013
Journal of Clinical Nephrology and Research
ISSN : 2379-0652
Launched : 2014
Annals of Community Medicine and Practice
ISSN : 2475-9465
Launched : 2014
Annals of Biometrics and Biostatistics
ISSN : 2374-0116
Launched : 2013
JSM Clinical Case Reports
ISSN : 2373-9819
Launched : 2013
Journal of Cancer Biology and Research
ISSN : 2373-9436
Launched : 2013
Journal of Surgery and Transplantation Science
ISSN : 2379-0911
Launched : 2013
Journal of Dermatology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2373-9371
Launched : 2013
JSM Gastroenterology and Hepatology
ISSN : 2373-9487
Launched : 2013
Annals of Nursing and Practice
ISSN : 2379-9501
Launched : 2014
JSM Dentistry
ISSN : 2333-7133
Launched : 2013
Author Information X