Partial Segmental Thrombosis of the Corpus Cavernosum: A Comprehensive Literature Review
- 1. Wayne State University School of Medicine, USA
- 2. Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, USA
Abstract
Perineal pain is a common and diagnostically challenging clinical presentation in urologic practices, with a broad range of potential etiologies. One potential, yet often underrecognized, cause is partial segmental thrombosis of the corpus cavernosum (PSTCC), a rare urologic condition with limited available descriptions. The exact etiology and pathophysiology remain poorly understood, though associations with trauma and hypercoagulable states have been identified. While patient presentations of perineal pain can be diverse and complex, providers should obtain a detailed history and appropriate imaging to consider PSTCC as part of the differential diagnosis. This review aims to enhance clinical awareness of PSTCC and provide a comprehensive literature review of the treatment options, outcomes, and likely etiology of previously reported cases. We hope to offer providers a concise, evidence-based approach to recognizing and managing PSTCC within the broader context of perineal pain.
Keywords: Partial segmental thrombosis of the corpus cavernosum; Partial priapism; Perineal pain; Sildenafil; Phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor; Erectile dysfunction
Introduction
Partial segmental thrombosis of the corpus cavernosum (PSTCC) is a rare urologic condition with limited documentation in the literature. Originally characterized as “partial priapism” by Gottesman et. al in 1976, PSTCC typically presents in young male patients with a painful, perineal mass and is often associated with a history of ED [1,2]. Clinically distinct from priapism, PSTCC’s symptoms develop over several days with localized pain and swelling rather than an acute painful erection. Imaging plays a pivotal role in confirming the diagnosis, with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offering superior diagnostic utility over computed tomography (CT) in distinguishing PSTCC from other etiologies of penile or perineal pain [2]. With fewer than 60 cases reported in the literature, PSTCC’s etiology and pathophysiology are not well understood. Associations have been observed with hypercoagulable disorders, mechanical trauma, sexual intercourse, and illicit drug use [3]. Existing cases document conservative management with anticoagulation or antiplatelet medications, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and a phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor (PDE-5i) prior to surgical intervention [4]. This review seeks to improve clinical recognition of PSTCC by presenting a thorough analysis of existing literature on its potential causes, treatment strategies, and patient outcomes. We ultimately aim to equip providers with a clear framework for identifying PSTCC in patients presenting with perineal pain and appropriately managing symptoms to prevent potential long-term complications.
Literature Search Methods
A literature search was performed through PubMed using the primary search terms of “partial segmental thrombosis of the corpus cavernosum”, “PSTCC”, “idiopathic partial thrombosis of the corpus cavernosum”, “IPTCC”, “partial segmental priapism”, "partial priapism”, and “partial penile thrombosis". Of the 268 resulting articles, titles, abstracts, and keywords were initially screened to identify relevant studies, and the selected studies were further evaluated using the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Our inclusion criteria included information from case reports, case series, and scoping reviews of the literature between 1976 and 2023. Relevant cited references were also included. Articles that did not align with the scope of this review and those unavailable in English were excluded from this study. In addition, to ensure the inclusion of relevant studies, duplicate articles were identified and removed through a manual screening process. These were cross-checked by comparing titles, authors, and publication details to ensure accuracy of the review. We found that 58 articles were eligible for our scoping review which included 45 single case reports, 6 cases series, and 7 literature reviews. Of these manuscripts, 28 patient cases were related to PSTCC, 9 to IPTCC, 2 to partial segmental priapism, and 21 to partial priapism.
Discussion
Partial segmental thrombosis of the corpus cavernosum (PSTCC) was first reported in 1976 after a patient presented with a painful perineal mass after prolonged sexual intercourse [1]. Since then, there have been less than 60 reported cases with the etiology remaining unclear. Various etiologies have been described, all of which have been summarized in Table 1. The most common reported etiologies include sexual activity, idiopathic, and perineal compression due to cycling or long plane rides [1-58].
Patients with PSTCC typically present with subacute perineal pain, and a pelvic MRI confirms the diagnosis. The underlying pathophysiology of this condition is not well understood, but previous reports have suggested mechanisms such as the “two-hit model”. Ilicki et al., proposed that the first hit is the presence of a congenital defect, as seen in our patient's case, or trauma-induced transverse membrane dividing the corpus into two portions. Microtrauma, medications, or a hypercoagulable state serve as the second hit leading to thrombus formation in the permeable portion of the membrane [2]. Medication as a cause of the “second hit” is supported by other reports hypothesizing that prolonged penile engorgement with PDE-5i use can lead to increased venous stasis, and in the presence of sexual activity induced microtrauma, can lead to clot formation and the development of PSTCC [3].
PSTCC treatment includes medical or surgical intervention based on symptom severity, physical exam findings, and radiographic imaging. Commonly utilized treatments are summarized in Table 1, and our review found that many patients were managed conservatively with anticoagulation, namely low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), for thrombosis management and non-opioid analgesics, such as NSAIDs, for pain control. In addition, sildenafil is often added to the treatment regimen to prevent penile fibrosis and scarring. Escalated treatment modalities, including procedural or surgical intervention, may be considered in cases refractory to medical management. Our review found that the most common procedures were intracavernosal injection of vasoactive medications, corporal incision, surgical removal of membranes, clot evacuation, or corporal cavernosal shunt [1,5-7,9,10,12,13,15,18,19,26,30,31,38,43,46,47]. Given that conservative management provides comparable outcomes, a stepwise approach is typically recommended for treating PSTCC [2]. Further studies are required to assess the complications of this condition; however, some cases noted erectile dysfunction as a long-term sequela.
To our knowledge, our narrative review of the literature is the most comprehensive and up-to-date review of PSTCC cases currently available. By providing an overview of previously published cases, this review highlights the importance of a thorough patient history and physical exam, prompt radiographic imaging, and timely intervention. Previous reports hypothesize the underlying pathophysiology of this condition; however, further information is needed to better understand the disease’s etiology, mechanism and development, and long-term outcomes.
Table 1
Table 1: Partial segmental thrombosis cases
Conclusion
Patient presentations of perineal pain can be diverse and complicated. It is essential for providers to obtain imaging and a detailed history to evaluate PSTCC as a potential cause. Treatment should aim to provide symptomatic relief and prevent long term complications such as fibrosis, scarring, or persistent erectile dysfunction. We aim to increase provider awareness of this rare urologic condition and provide a comprehensive review of the various etiologies and treatment of PSTCC.
Author Contribution Statement
All authors contributed to the production, review, and revision of this manuscript.
References
1. Gateman JE. Recurrent partial priapism. Urology. 1976; 7: 519-520.
5. Hillis RS, Weems WL. Priapism: An Unusual Presentation. J Urol. 1976; 116: 124-125.
6. Johnson GR, Corriere JN. Partial Priapism. J Urol. 1980; 124: 147-148.
7. Llado J, Peterson LJ, Fair WR. Pripism of the proximal penis. J Urol. 1980; 123: 779-780.
31. Hoyerup P, Azawi NH. Partial priapism. BMJ Case Rep. 2013: bcr2013200031.