Loading

Annals of Sports Medicine and Research

Gender Differences in Peak Blood Lactate Concentration and Lactate Removal

Review Article | Open Access | Volume 3 | Issue 7

  • 1. Department of Kinesiology, University of Texas, USA
+ Show More - Show Less
Corresponding Authors
John Q. Zhang, Laboratory of Cardiovascular Research, University of Texas at San Antonio, Department of Kinesiology, Health, and Nutrition, UTSA Circle, San Antonio, TX 78249, USA Tel: 1-210-458-7390; Fax: 1-210-458-5873;
Abstract

Anaerobic exercise induces accumulation of lactate, which may cause muscular fatigue. Consequently, lactate removal during recovery may be critical for resumption of exercise, especially during athletic competition. The purpose of the study was to compare gender differences in peak blood lactate concentration and removal rate following strenuous exercise. Untrained, physically active male (n=17) and female (n=17) college students (23.4 + 2.8 yrs) were used as subjects. Subjects performed a treadmill test to determine their maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max) and obtain peak blood lactate concentrations at 5 min post-exercise. Immediately thereafter, subjects performed an active recovery on a treadmill at 40% VO2max for 30 min for determination of lactate removal. Blood samples were taken at rest, 5th min of sitting recovery following a treadmill VO2 max test, and at 5th, 10th, 15th, 20th, and 30th min of 30 min active recovery at 40% VO2max. There were no significant gender differences in resting and peak blood lactate concentrations. There was no gender difference in blood lactate removal at any time point during the active recovery period. During active recovery, the largest and the smallest percentages of blood lactate removed were observed between 5 to 10 min, and 20 to 30 min, respectively. Nearly 80% of the lactate was removed by the end of 30 min recovery period. These data show that untrained young men and women have similar resting and peak blood lactate concentrations, and no differences in the rate of blood lactate removal during active recovery from a strenuous exercise.

Keywords

Exercise , Lactate , Removal , VO2 max , Sex

Citation

Zhang JQ, Ji LL (2016) Gender Differences in Peak Blood Lactate Concentration and Lactate Removal. Ann Sports Med Res 3(7): 1088.

INTRODUCTION

An accumulation of lactate occurs when one is not able to meet the energy demand of exercise by aerobic metabolism. Lactic acid produced in skeletal muscle during exercise diffuses into the blood. Blood lactate concentration represents the difference between release of lactate into blood from contracting skeletal muscle and the removal (uptake) of lactate by various tissues, including the liver [1], heart muscle [2], and skeletal muscle [3, 4]. The accumulation of lactate in the blood is believed to represent an increased reliance on glycolytic pathways for energy production, and a subsequently faster rate of lactate diffusion into blood compared with removal from blood [5]. Lactic acid dissociates readily resulting in lactate, the salt of the acid, plus a hydrogen ion (H+ ).An increased lactic acid production, therefore, results in increased H+ release and a subsequent decrease in muscle pH [6]. A decrease in muscle pH limits the production of energy through anaerobic glycolysis by the inhibition of the rate limiting enzymes phosphofructokinase [7] and phosphorylase [8].

Gollnick and Hermansen [9] have shown that muscle fatigue is associated with blood lactate concentrations usually between 60 and 200mg%. Thus, lactate appears to cause muscular fatigue indirectly by decreasing the intracellular pH of muscle. High level of blood lactate induces in low athletic performance [10]. Consequently, lactate accumulation during exercise and removal during recovery may be critical for resumption of exercise, especially during athletic competition.

In general, compared to women, men possess larger muscle mass, higher hemoglobin concentration, more blood volume, and higher maximal oxygen consumption (VO2 max) [11]. These differences may lead to the speculation on gender differences in lactate production during strenuous exercise and lactate removal during recovery. However, gender differences in peak lactate concentration and lactate removal have not been systematically studied. Conflicting results have been reported from research on gender differences related to lactate metabolism. Froberg and Pedersen [12], Lehmann et al., [13], and Ohkuwa, Miyamura, Andou, and Utsuno [14] found no differences in resting and peak blood lactate concentration between untrained men and women after exercise at submaximal and maximal intensities. However, Komi and Karlsson [15] reported that the lactate concentration in untrained men was higher than in untrained women following a maximal treadmill running test. Costill , Fink, Getchell , Ivy, and Witzmann [16] found that the blood lactate concentration was higher in trained female runners than in trained male runners after 30 and 60 min of submaximal exercise (70% VO2 max).

Numerous researchers have examined lactate removal after strenuous exercise. The rate of removal of lactate from the blood was accelerated up to about two fold by performance of light aerobic exercise during the recovery period [17, 18]. The elimination of lactate from the blood following exhaustive work appears to be due to an increased blood flow and more rapid transportation of lactate to the liver for resyntheses of glycogen and the oxidation of lactate to CO2 and water in the working muscles [19, 20]. Several researchers have found that the optimal intensity for blood lactate removal during recovery exercise approximates 40 to 60%VO2 max [18, 21-23]. Results from studies comparing gender differences in blood lactate accumulation are limited and equivocal, and no studies were found where the researchers specifically examined gender differences in blood lactate removal after strenuous exercise. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to compare gender differences in peak blood lactate concentration and removal rate following strenuous exercise.

METHODS

Subjects

Subjects for this study were physically active untrained college volunteers (men, n=17; women n=17), 19 to 28 years of age. All subjects signed a written informed consent approved by the Institutional Review Board. Subjects were screened for physical activity and body fatness before selection. Forty five subjects volunteered but only 34 of them met the healthy (medical questionnaire) untrained, but active, non-obese criteria (less than 30% fat for women, less than 19% fat for men). Based on a self-reported physical activity survey, the subjects engaged in light to moderate aerobic exercise for 90 to 120 min per week. All female subjects had regular menstrual cycles.

Values are expressed as mean + SD; HR, heart rate; NS, not significant (p> 0.05).

Experimental Procedures

The subjects were asked to maintain their usual diet during the three days before testing and to refrain from strenuous exercise for 48 hours prior to testing. No food intake was allowed for 3 hour prior to testing. Upon reporting to the laboratory, the subjects were measured for height (Ht), weight (Wt), skin folds, resting heart rate (HR) (5 min), and resting oxygen uptake (5 min). A resting blood sample was taken for lactate analysis. Subjects performed a treadmill test to determine their VO2 max and obtain peak blood lactate concentrations at 5 min post-exercise sitting at rest. Immediately thereafter, subjects performed an active recovery by walking on a treadmill at 40% VO2 max for 30 min for determination of lactate removal. The mean values of triplicate skin fold measurements was used to estimate body density using the equations described for men and women, respectively [24]. Percent body fat was determined from the Siri equation [25] .

Oxygen uptake measurements

Oxygen uptake measurements were made using a Sensormedics-2900 metabolic cart (Sensormedics Co, Ahaheim, CA). A progressive, continuous treadmill test was utilized to assess VO2 max, obtain maximal effort exercise for peak blood lactate concentration, and determine the work load at 40% VO2 max for each subject. Following warm-up (3 min at 3.0 mph, 0% grade for men, and 2.0 mph, 0% grade for women), the treadmill speed was increased by 1 mph (0% grade) every 3 min, up to 4 mph for women and 5 mph for men. Thereafter, speed was increased by 1 mph (0% grade) every 2 min up to 6 mph for women and 7 mph for men. The grade was then increased by 2% every 2 min (speed constant) until the subject was exhausted. The criteria used for the determination of VO2 max were a plateau in VO2 (increase of less 2 ml. kg-1.min-1) and a respiratory exchange ratio (RER) of greater than 1.1 during the final stage of exercise. Oxygen uptake was measured and respiratory exchange ratio was calculated for each minute of rest, the VO2 max test, and recovery (5 min sitting and 30 active recovery). Heart rate was monitored continuously and the mean of the last 15 s of each min was recorded. Values obtained during the last minute (near steady state) of each exercise intensity were used to represent that workload.

Immediately following the VO2 max test, the subject sat in a chair for 5 min, and then performed an active recovery test at 40% VO2 max for 30 min. VO2 was measure every minute of active recovery to verify the exercise intensity of 40% VO2 max. If VO2 exceeded +5% from the desired intensity 5 min after the recovery test started, the treadmill speed was adjusted accordingly. The mean VO2 and mean heart rate values from the last 25 min were used to determine the actual percentage of VO2 max and HR during the active recovery period.

Blood lactate measurement

Puncture blood samples were collected into heparinized capillary tubes at the 5th min (sitting rest) after the VO2 max test and during the active recovery test (at the 5th, 10th, 15th, 20th, and 30th min). Blood samples were immediately transferred into tubes containing 50 µl of lactate buffer, Triton X-100, and sodium fluoride. Lactate concentrations were measured within 2 hours after the blood sample was obtained using an YSI model 23L L-Lactate analyzer (Yellow Springs Instrument Co., Yellow Springs, OH). Duplicate measurements were taken for each sample, and the mean value for the duplicate samples was used in analysis. The test-retest reliability of duplicate samples yielded a correlation coefficient of r=0.998.

Blood lactate removal rate (LaRR%) during the 30 min active recovery period was calculated using the following formula:

LaRR% = (P – S1-5) / (P – R) X 100,

Where P is peak lactate concentration, S1-5 represents each of the lactate concentrations from the five recovery blood samples, and R is resting blood lactate concentration. LaRR% represent the percentage of blood lactate removed at each given time point relative to the peak concentration.

The percentage of blood lactate removed within each time segment (difference between two adjoined removal rates) was also calculated to identify possible differences in lactate removal among the five time segments (0-5, 5-10, 10-15, 15-21, and 20- 30 min) during active recovery. These percentages reflected percentage of the total lactate removed within a given time segment.

Statistical analysis

Group’s t-tests were used to determine gender differences in physical characteristics examined. A two-way ANOVA with repeated measures was used to detect the variations in the experimental parameters. A Newman-Keuls teat was used for multiple comparisons if there was a significant time effect. The accepted level of significance for this study was p < 0.05

RESULTS

The descriptive statistics for the physical characteristics of the subjects are presented in (Table 1). The mean height, weight, and VO2 max (ml. kg-1.min-1) of the men were significantly (p <0.05) higher than that of the women. The percent body fat was significantly (p<0.05) higher in the women than in the men. When expressed as oxygen consumption to free fat weight (ml. kg FFW-1.min-1 ), the meanVO2 max of the men was not significantly different from the women. There were no significant gender differences in age, age, HRmax, recovery VO2 (last 25 min), and recovery HR (last 25 min).

Figure (1) depicts blood lactate concentrations and removal patterns for men and women. No significant (p >0.84) gender differences were found in the mean blood lactate concentrations at rest, peak, or at any of the recovery times. All mean blood lactate concentrations at a given time point were significantly (p < 0.05) different from each other except for rest vs. min 30 min values. The blood lactate removal rate (LaRR %) within each time segment during active recovery are depicted in Figure (2). No significant (p = 0.39) gender differences were found in 

Table 1: Physical Characteristic of Subjects.

Variables Men (n= 17) Women (n= 17) P value
Age (yr) 23.7 + 2.9 23.2 + 2.7 NS
Height (cm) 176.0 + 5.6 161.0 + 6.6 <0.05
Weight (kg) 74.7 +9.6 58.8 + 5.5 <0.05
Fat (%) 13.3 + 4.3 22.3 + 5.6 <0.05
HRmax (b. min-1) 196.0 + 9.9 191.2 + 12.3 NS
VO2 max (ml. kg-1.min-1) 50.9 + 3.2 44.6 + 4.2 <0.05
VO2 max (ml. kg FFW-1.min-1) 56.7 + 3.1 57.5 + 4.8 NS
Recovery %VO2 max 38.9 + 1.1 38.9 + 0.9 NS
Recovery HR (b. min-1) 142.4 + 9.5 141.7 + 15.0 NS
Values are expressed as mean + SD; HR, heart rate; NS, not significant (p> 0.05).

Figure 1 Blood Lactate concentrations and removal patterns for men and women. No significant (p = 0.84) gender differences were found in the mean blood lactate concentrations at rest, peak, or at any of the recovery times. *All mean blood lactate concentrations at a given time point were significantly (p < 0.05) different from each other except for rest vs. min 30 min values.

Figure 1: Blood Lactate concentrations and removal patterns for men and women. No significant (p = 0.84) gender differences were found in the mean blood lactate concentrations at rest, peak, or at any of the recovery times. *All mean blood lactate concentrations at a given time point were significantly (p < 0.05) different from each other except for rest vs. min 30 min values.

Figure 2 Blood Lactate removal rate within each time segment during active recovery for men and women. No significant (p = 0.39) gender differences were found in blood lactate removal within each time segment during the active recovery period. When time segments were compared for the percentages of lactate removed, there were significant (p < 0.05) mean differences in blood lactate removal among the five different time segments except between the 0-5 min and 5-10 min periods.

Figure 2: Blood Lactate removal rate within each time segment during active recovery for men and women. No significant (p = 0.39) gender differences were found in blood lactate removal within each time segment during the active recovery period. When time segments were compared for the percentages of lactate removed, there were significant (p < 0.05) mean differences in blood lactate removal among the five different time segments except between the 0-5 min and 5-10 min periods.

blood lactate removal within each time segment during the active recovery period. When time segments were compared for the percentages of lactate removed, there were significant (p < 0.05) mean differences in blood lactate removal among the five different time segments except between the 0-5 min and 5-10 min periods. The largest and the smallest percentage of blood lactate removed were observed between 2 to 10 min, and 20 to 30 min, respectively.

DISCUSSION

The principal findings of this study were that the blood lactate concentrations of the untrained men and women were not different at rest, at peak, nor during 30 min of active recovery at 40% VO2 max. Secondly, the lactate removal rates during active recovery (40% VO2 max) did not differ between men and women.

The male and female subjects used in this study had similar physical fitness levels identified from their physical activity histories and their VO2 max expressed as ml. kg FFW-1.min-1 (Table 1). The difference (12% higher for men) inVO2 max expressed as ml. kg-1.min-1 for the men and the women in the present study can be explained by the fact that the women had a significantly higher percent body fat than the men [26]. The similar physical fitness levels (expressed as VO2 max to free fat weight) of the male and female subjects may explain the lack of gender differences in peak blood lactate concentration and lactate removal rates.

Blood Lactate concentrations

The mean values of resting blood lactate concentrations (0.99 + 0.41 vs 0.97 + 0.39 mmol. l -1 for men and women, respectively) in the present study were similar to those reported by Lehmann et al., [13] who reported no gender difference in resting blood lactate concentration (1.43 ± 0.2 and 0.97± 0.2 mmol. l -1 for men and women, respectively). The peak blood lactate values (9.26 + 2.0 vs. 9.01 + 2.3 mmol. l -1 for men and women, respectively) from the present study were also compatible with the results from a study by Fro berg and Pedersen [12]. They reported that men and women had similar peak blood lactate concentration. Similarly, Lehmann et al., [13] also reported that there was no difference in peak lactate concentrations between men and women (10.3 ± 2.2vs. 10.8± 1.5 mmol. l -1).

Because skeletal muscle is the major source of lactate production during strenuous exercise [27], and the men had more muscle mass than the women, it might be expected that men could produce more lactate and might have higher peak blood lactate concentration. There is some evidence, however, that women have higher plasma epinephrine concentrations during strenuous exercise [13]. Epinephrine stimulates glycogenolysis and, therefore, may enhance lactate production. Thus, the women could have had a higher blood epinephrine concentration during strenuous exercise which might help compensate for a lower lactate production from their smaller muscle mass. Since epinephrine concentration was not measured in this study, however, this explanation is only hypothetical.

Another possible explanation for the similar peak blood lactate values between men and women in this study may be that blood lactate concentration is affected not only by the lactate diffusion into the blood but also by the blood volume into which it diffuses. Because women have a smaller total blood volume (4.0 to 4.5 l) than men (5.0 to 6.0 l) [28], a smaller amount of lactate would be required to produce a similar blood lactate concentration.

The female subjects in this study had almost twice the percent body fat as the male subjects (22.3% vs. 13.3%).

Significant lactate production from glucose has been found in adipose tissue [29, 30]. Hagstrom et al., [29] reported that the maximum lactate concentration in subcutaneous adipose tissue was 30% higher than that in blood plasma after oral glucose ingestion. Following glucose ingestion, the glucose taken up by adipose tissue was 10-20% of the total body glucose uptake [31] and the glucose taken up by adipose tissue was partly converted to lactate [29, 30]. Because blood glucose concentration typically increases during short-term strenuous exercise [32, 33] greater glucose uptake may occur in adipose tissue even though there is not an increased need for additional glucose for reformation of triglycerides. Under such conditions, some of the glucose taken up by adipose tissue might be converted to lactate. However, it is not known whether the high percent fat in women influences lactate entering blood from adipose tissue during exercise.

Although women have less muscle mass than men, and skeletal muscle is the major contributor to blood lactate concentration, their similar free fat weight VO2 max (ml. kg FFW1. min-1) to men, higher percentage of adipose of adipose tissue, expected smaller blood volume, and possibly higher blood epinephrine concentration might compensate for the smaller total amount of lactate produced from their smaller muscle mass and, thus, account for a peak blood lactate concentration similar to that of men.

Blood Lactate removal rate

Lactate produced during anaerobic exercise can be removed during aerobic exercise and recovery through the Cori cycle [1]. In Cori cycle, lactate is transported via blood to the liver where it is converted back to glucose, which either can be transported back to the muscles or stored as glycogen in the liver [1]. In addition, cardiac muscles [34] and slow twitch muscle fibers [35] are another major sources for lactate removal, where lactate is converted to pyruvate and acetyl-CoA to be oxidized in the Krebs cycle.

After 30 min of active recovery at 40% VO2 max, 99.6% and 98.0% of the blood lactate were removed for the men and women, respectively. This finding supports the previous observations on men by Belcastro and Bonen [17], and Stanford at al., [21]. The lactate removal rates of the male subjects in the present study were similar to those of the female subjects at each of the five measurement times during the active recovery period. Because blood lactate can be removed by well oxygenated skeletal muscles [36,37] the similar levels of aerobic fitness relative to free fat body mass may explain why the blood lactate removal rates of men and women were not different. Furthermore, both groups exercised at the same percentage (about 40%) of VO2max during the recovery period, an exercise intensity at which skeletal muscle is expected to be well oxygenated.

Another factor which could help women remove lactate at a rate similar to men, despite their smaller muscle mass, is a higher plasma concentration of EPI for women during strenuous exercise [13]. If plasma EPI concentrations were higher in these women, they could have a faster rate of glycogenolysis and a greater glycogen decrease during exercise. Since skeletal muscle with lower glycogen content can take up more lactate [37, 38]. It is possible that if the female subjects had relatively lower glycogen concentration, they could remove blood lactate faster during recovery, which would help compensate for their smaller muscle mass. The extent to which skeletal muscle glycogen decrease occurs during a maximal effort test, however, would be small. Consequently, any gender differences in glycogen depletion would be small with the short term, strenuous exercise in this study. Because the muscle glycogen levels were not measured in the present study, the contribution of a lower skeletal muscle glycogen concentration to blood lactate removal is hypothetical.

In the present study, the mean heart rate during the active recovery was 74% of the maximal heart rate. Since nearly 80% of the blood lactate was removed within 15 min and almost 100% of the lactate was removed by the end of the 30 min active recovery period, it is suggested that an untrained individual can have a rapid removal of lactate from blood with a warm down at about 70 to 75% of his or her maximal heart rate following strenuous exercise.

In conclusion, our data showed no gender differences in resting or peak blood lactate concentrations, nor in the rate of blood lactate removal of young adult men and women with similar aerobic fitness level expressed as ml. kg FFW1.min-1.. Exercise at 70 to 75% of the maximal heart rate may be desirable recovery intensity for effective blood lactate removal following maximal effort exercise for physically active untrained young adult men and women. Additional studies including measurements of muscle fiber composition, LDH activity, and concentrations of EPI, blood glucose, and muscle glycogen are needed to identify more clearly the similarities or differences in lactate metabolism between men and women.

REFERENCES

1. Cori CF, Cori GT. Glycogen formation in the liver from d and l- lactic acid. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1929; 81: 389-403.

2. Carlsten A, Hallgren B, Jagenburg R, Svanborg A, Werko L. Myocardial metabolism of glucose, lactic acid, amino acids and fatty acids in healthy human individuals at rest and at different work loads. Scandinavian Journal of Clinical Laboratory Investigation. 1961; 13: 418-428.

3. Jorfeldt L. Metabolism of l (plus) - lactate in human skeletal muscle during exercise. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica. (Supplementum). 1970; 338: 1-67

4. Stainsby WN, Welch HG. Lactate metabolism of contracting dog skeletal muscle in situ. American Journal Physiology. 1966; 211: 177- 183.

5. Brooks GA, Fahey TD, Baldwin KM. Exercise physiology : Human bioenergetics and its applications. Boston: McGraw-Hill; 2005.

6. Wenger HA, Reek AT. Metabolic factors associated with muscular fatigue during aerobic and anaerobic work. Canadian Journal of Applied Sports Sciences. 1976; 1: 43-48

7. Danforth WH. Control of energy metabolism activation of the glycolytic pathway in muscle. In: Chance B. EBW, & Williamson J. R., ed. Control of energy metabolism. New York: Academic; 1965: 287- 297.

8. Hultman E, Sahlin K. Acid-base balance during exercise. Exercise Sport Sciences Review. 1980; 8: 41-128.

9. Gollnick PD, Hermansen L. Biochemical adaptations to exercise: Anaerobic metabolism. Exercise and Sport Science Review. 1973;1 :1- 43.

10. Lopez-Segovia M, Pareja-Blanco F, Jimenez-Reyes P, Gonzalez-Badillo JJ. Determinant factors of repeat sprint sequences in young soccer players. Int. J. Sports Med. 2015; 36:130-136.

11. Powers SK, Howley ET. Exercise physiology : Theory and application to fitness and performance.

12. Froberg K, Pedersen PK. Sex differences in endurance capacity and metabolic response to prolonged, heavy exercise. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. Occup. Physiol. 1984; 52: 446-450.

13. Lehmann M, Berg A, Keul J. Sex-related differences in free plasma catecholamines in individuals of similar performance ability during graded ergometric exercise. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. Occup. Physiol. 1986; 55: 54-58

14. Ohkuwa T, Miyamura M, Andou Y, Utsuno T. Sex differences in lactate and glycerol levels during maximal aerobic and anaerobic running. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. Occup. Physiol. 1988; 57: 746- 752.

15. Komi PV, Karlsson J. Skeletal-muscle fiber types, enzyme-activities and physical performance in young males and females. Acta Physiol. Scand. 1978; 103: 210-218.

16. Costill DL, Fink WJ, Getchell LH, Ivy JL, Witzmann FA. Lipid metabolism in skeletal muscle of endurance-trained males and females. J. Appl. Physiol. 1979; 47: 787-791.

17. Belcastro AN, Bonen A. Lactic acid removal rates during controlled and uncontrolled recovery exercise. J. Appl. Physiol. 1975; 39: 932- 936.

18. Boileau RA, Misner JE, Dykstra GL, Spitzer TA. Blood lactic-acid removal during treadmill and bicycle exercise at various intensities. J Sport Med Phys Fit. 1983; 23: 159-167.

19. Astrand PO, Rodahl K. Textbook of work physiology: Physiological bases of exercise. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1986.

20. Donovan CM, Pagliassotti MJ. Quantitative assessment of pathways for lactate disposal in skeletal muscle fiber types. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2000; 32: 772-777.

21. Stamford BA, Weltman A, Moffatt R, Sady S. Exercise recovery above and below anaerobic threshold following maximal work. J. Appl. Physiol. 1981; 51: 840-844

22. Vescovi JD, Falenchuk O, Wells GD. Blood lactate concentration and clearance in elite swimmers during competition. Int. J. Sports Physiol. Perform. 2011; 6: 106-117.

23. Menzies P, Menzies C, McIntyre L, Paterson P, Wilson J, Kemi OJ. Blood lactate clearance during active recovery after an intense running bout depends on the intensity of the active recovery. J. Sports Sci. 2010; 28: 975-982.

24. American College of Sports Medicine, Thompson WR, Gordon NF, Pescatello LS. Acsm’s guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2010.

25. Siri WE. Body composition from fluid spaces and density : Analysis of method. In: Brozek J, Henschel A, eds. Techniques for measuring body composition. Washington, DC: National Academy of Science-National Research Council; 1961: 223-244.

26. Chasiotis D, Sahlin K, Hultman E. Regulation of glycogenolysis in human muscle in response to epinephrine infusion. J. Appl. Physiol. 1983; 54: 45-50.

27. Anderson GS, Rhodes EC. A review of blood lactate and ventilatory methods of detecting transition thresholds. Sports Med. 1989; 8 :43- 55.

28. Wilmore JH, Costill DL. Training for sport and activity: The physiological base of the conditioning process. Dubque, IA: Wm. C. Brown; 1986.

29. Hagstrom E, Arner P, Ungerstedt U, Bolinder J. Subcutaneous adipose tissue: A source of lactate production after glucose ingestion in humans. American Journal of Physiology. 1990; 258: E888-893.

30. Jansson PA, Smith U, Lonnroth P. Evidence for lactate production by human adipose tissue in vivo. Diabetologia. 1990; 33: 253-256.

31. Marin P, Rebuffe-Scrive M, Smith U, Bjorntorp P. Glucose uptake in human adipose tissue. Metabolism. 1987;36:1154-1160.

32. Sutton JR. Hormonal and metabolic responses to exercise in subjects of high and low work capacities. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 1978;10:1-6.

33. Beneke R, Jumah MD, Leithauser RM. Modelling the lactate response to short-term all out exercise. Dyn. Med. 2007; 6:10.

34. Carlsten A, Hallgren B, Jagenburg R, Svanborg A, Werko L. Myocardial metabolism of glucose, lactic acid, amino acids and fatty acids in healthy human individuals at rest and at different work loads. Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Invest. 1961;13: 418-428.

35. Brooks GA, Dubouchaud H, Brown M, Sicurello JP, Butz CE. Role of mitochondrial lactate dehydrogenase and lactate oxidation in the intracellular lactate shuttle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1999; 96: 1129-1134.

36. Moxnes JF, Sandbakk O. The kinetics of lactate production and removal during whole-body exercise. Theor. Biol. Med. Model. 2012; 9: 7.

37. Adeva-Andany M, Lopez-Ojen M, Funcasta-Calderon R, AmeneirosRodriguez E, Donapetry-Garcia C, Vila-Altesor M, Rodriguez-Seijas J. Comprehensive review on lactate metabolism in human health. Mitochondrion. 2014; 17: 76-100.

38. Essen B, Pernow B, Gollnick PD, Saltin B. Muscle glycogen content and lactate uptake in exercising muscle. In: Howald H, Poortmans JR, eds. Metabolic adaptations to prolonged physical exercise. Basel: Dirkhauser; 1975: 130-134

Zhang JQ, Ji LL (2016) Gender Differences in Peak Blood Lactate Concentration and Lactate Removal. Ann Sports Med Res 3(7): 1088.

Received : 30 Jul 2016
Accepted : 14 Sep 2016
Published : 16 Sep 2016
Journals
Annals of Otolaryngology and Rhinology
ISSN : 2379-948X
Launched : 2014
JSM Schizophrenia
Launched : 2016
Journal of Nausea
Launched : 2020
JSM Internal Medicine
Launched : 2016
JSM Hepatitis
Launched : 2016
JSM Oro Facial Surgeries
ISSN : 2578-3211
Launched : 2016
Journal of Human Nutrition and Food Science
ISSN : 2333-6706
Launched : 2013
JSM Regenerative Medicine and Bioengineering
ISSN : 2379-0490
Launched : 2013
JSM Spine
ISSN : 2578-3181
Launched : 2016
Archives of Palliative Care
ISSN : 2573-1165
Launched : 2016
JSM Nutritional Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3203
Launched : 2017
Annals of Neurodegenerative Disorders
ISSN : 2476-2032
Launched : 2016
Journal of Fever
ISSN : 2641-7782
Launched : 2017
JSM Bone Marrow Research
ISSN : 2578-3351
Launched : 2016
JSM Mathematics and Statistics
ISSN : 2578-3173
Launched : 2014
Journal of Autoimmunity and Research
ISSN : 2573-1173
Launched : 2014
JSM Arthritis
ISSN : 2475-9155
Launched : 2016
JSM Head and Neck Cancer-Cases and Reviews
ISSN : 2573-1610
Launched : 2016
JSM General Surgery Cases and Images
ISSN : 2573-1564
Launched : 2016
JSM Anatomy and Physiology
ISSN : 2573-1262
Launched : 2016
JSM Dental Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1548
Launched : 2016
Annals of Emergency Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1017
Launched : 2016
Annals of Mens Health and Wellness
ISSN : 2641-7707
Launched : 2017
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Health Care
ISSN : 2576-0084
Launched : 2018
Journal of Chronic Diseases and Management
ISSN : 2573-1300
Launched : 2016
Annals of Vaccines and Immunization
ISSN : 2378-9379
Launched : 2014
JSM Heart Surgery Cases and Images
ISSN : 2578-3157
Launched : 2016
Annals of Reproductive Medicine and Treatment
ISSN : 2573-1092
Launched : 2016
JSM Brain Science
ISSN : 2573-1289
Launched : 2016
JSM Biomarkers
ISSN : 2578-3815
Launched : 2014
JSM Biology
ISSN : 2475-9392
Launched : 2016
Archives of Stem Cell and Research
ISSN : 2578-3580
Launched : 2014
Annals of Clinical and Medical Microbiology
ISSN : 2578-3629
Launched : 2014
JSM Pediatric Surgery
ISSN : 2578-3149
Launched : 2017
Journal of Memory Disorder and Rehabilitation
ISSN : 2578-319X
Launched : 2016
JSM Tropical Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2578-3165
Launched : 2016
JSM Head and Face Medicine
ISSN : 2578-3793
Launched : 2016
JSM Cardiothoracic Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1297
Launched : 2016
JSM Bone and Joint Diseases
ISSN : 2578-3351
Launched : 2017
JSM Bioavailability and Bioequivalence
ISSN : 2641-7812
Launched : 2017
JSM Atherosclerosis
ISSN : 2573-1270
Launched : 2016
Journal of Genitourinary Disorders
ISSN : 2641-7790
Launched : 2017
Journal of Fractures and Sprains
ISSN : 2578-3831
Launched : 2016
Journal of Autism and Epilepsy
ISSN : 2641-7774
Launched : 2016
Annals of Marine Biology and Research
ISSN : 2573-105X
Launched : 2014
JSM Health Education & Primary Health Care
ISSN : 2578-3777
Launched : 2016
JSM Communication Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3807
Launched : 2016
Annals of Musculoskeletal Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3599
Launched : 2016
Annals of Virology and Research
ISSN : 2573-1122
Launched : 2014
JSM Renal Medicine
ISSN : 2573-1637
Launched : 2016
Journal of Muscle Health
ISSN : 2578-3823
Launched : 2016
JSM Genetics and Genomics
ISSN : 2334-1823
Launched : 2013
JSM Anxiety and Depression
ISSN : 2475-9139
Launched : 2016
Clinical Journal of Heart Diseases
ISSN : 2641-7766
Launched : 2016
Annals of Medicinal Chemistry and Research
ISSN : 2378-9336
Launched : 2014
JSM Pain and Management
ISSN : 2578-3378
Launched : 2016
JSM Women's Health
ISSN : 2578-3696
Launched : 2016
Clinical Research in HIV or AIDS
ISSN : 2374-0094
Launched : 2013
Journal of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Obesity
ISSN : 2333-6692
Launched : 2013
Journal of Substance Abuse and Alcoholism
ISSN : 2373-9363
Launched : 2013
JSM Neurosurgery and Spine
ISSN : 2373-9479
Launched : 2013
Journal of Liver and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2379-0830
Launched : 2014
Journal of Drug Design and Research
ISSN : 2379-089X
Launched : 2014
JSM Clinical Oncology and Research
ISSN : 2373-938X
Launched : 2013
JSM Bioinformatics, Genomics and Proteomics
ISSN : 2576-1102
Launched : 2014
JSM Chemistry
ISSN : 2334-1831
Launched : 2013
Journal of Trauma and Care
ISSN : 2573-1246
Launched : 2014
JSM Surgical Oncology and Research
ISSN : 2578-3688
Launched : 2016
Annals of Food Processing and Preservation
ISSN : 2573-1033
Launched : 2016
Journal of Radiology and Radiation Therapy
ISSN : 2333-7095
Launched : 2013
JSM Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
ISSN : 2578-3572
Launched : 2016
Annals of Clinical Pathology
ISSN : 2373-9282
Launched : 2013
Annals of Cardiovascular Diseases
ISSN : 2641-7731
Launched : 2016
Journal of Behavior
ISSN : 2576-0076
Launched : 2016
Annals of Clinical and Experimental Metabolism
ISSN : 2572-2492
Launched : 2016
Clinical Research in Infectious Diseases
ISSN : 2379-0636
Launched : 2013
JSM Microbiology
ISSN : 2333-6455
Launched : 2013
Journal of Urology and Research
ISSN : 2379-951X
Launched : 2014
Journal of Family Medicine and Community Health
ISSN : 2379-0547
Launched : 2013
Annals of Pregnancy and Care
ISSN : 2578-336X
Launched : 2017
JSM Cell and Developmental Biology
ISSN : 2379-061X
Launched : 2013
Annals of Aquaculture and Research
ISSN : 2379-0881
Launched : 2014
Clinical Research in Pulmonology
ISSN : 2333-6625
Launched : 2013
Journal of Immunology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2333-6714
Launched : 2013
Annals of Forensic Research and Analysis
ISSN : 2378-9476
Launched : 2014
JSM Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
ISSN : 2333-7109
Launched : 2013
Annals of Breast Cancer Research
ISSN : 2641-7685
Launched : 2016
Annals of Gerontology and Geriatric Research
ISSN : 2378-9409
Launched : 2014
Journal of Sleep Medicine and Disorders
ISSN : 2379-0822
Launched : 2014
JSM Burns and Trauma
ISSN : 2475-9406
Launched : 2016
Chemical Engineering and Process Techniques
ISSN : 2333-6633
Launched : 2013
Annals of Clinical Cytology and Pathology
ISSN : 2475-9430
Launched : 2014
JSM Allergy and Asthma
ISSN : 2573-1254
Launched : 2016
Journal of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
ISSN : 2334-2307
Launched : 2013
JSM Sexual Medicine
ISSN : 2578-3718
Launched : 2016
Annals of Vascular Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2378-9344
Launched : 2014
JSM Biotechnology and Biomedical Engineering
ISSN : 2333-7117
Launched : 2013
Journal of Hematology and Transfusion
ISSN : 2333-6684
Launched : 2013
JSM Environmental Science and Ecology
ISSN : 2333-7141
Launched : 2013
Journal of Cardiology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2333-6676
Launched : 2013
JSM Nanotechnology and Nanomedicine
ISSN : 2334-1815
Launched : 2013
Journal of Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders
ISSN : 2475-9473
Launched : 2016
JSM Ophthalmology
ISSN : 2333-6447
Launched : 2013
Journal of Pharmacology and Clinical Toxicology
ISSN : 2333-7079
Launched : 2013
Annals of Psychiatry and Mental Health
ISSN : 2374-0124
Launched : 2013
Medical Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
ISSN : 2333-6439
Launched : 2013
Annals of Pediatrics and Child Health
ISSN : 2373-9312
Launched : 2013
JSM Clinical Pharmaceutics
ISSN : 2379-9498
Launched : 2014
JSM Foot and Ankle
ISSN : 2475-9112
Launched : 2016
JSM Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementia
ISSN : 2378-9565
Launched : 2014
Journal of Addiction Medicine and Therapy
ISSN : 2333-665X
Launched : 2013
Journal of Veterinary Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2378-931X
Launched : 2013
Annals of Public Health and Research
ISSN : 2378-9328
Launched : 2014
Annals of Orthopedics and Rheumatology
ISSN : 2373-9290
Launched : 2013
Journal of Clinical Nephrology and Research
ISSN : 2379-0652
Launched : 2014
Annals of Community Medicine and Practice
ISSN : 2475-9465
Launched : 2014
Annals of Biometrics and Biostatistics
ISSN : 2374-0116
Launched : 2013
JSM Clinical Case Reports
ISSN : 2373-9819
Launched : 2013
Journal of Cancer Biology and Research
ISSN : 2373-9436
Launched : 2013
Journal of Surgery and Transplantation Science
ISSN : 2379-0911
Launched : 2013
Journal of Dermatology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2373-9371
Launched : 2013
JSM Gastroenterology and Hepatology
ISSN : 2373-9487
Launched : 2013
Annals of Nursing and Practice
ISSN : 2379-9501
Launched : 2014
JSM Dentistry
ISSN : 2333-7133
Launched : 2013
Author Information X