Loading

Annals of Sports Medicine and Research

Ten Minutes Ergometer Rowing Exercise Increases Pressure Pain Thresholds in High Performance Rowers

Research Article | Open Access | Volume 3 | Issue 7

  • 1. Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Queens Medical Centre, UK
  • 2. Division of Rheumatology, University of Nottingham, UK
+ Show More - Show Less
Corresponding Authors
Ashley I. Simpson, Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Queens Medical Centre, Flat 15, 6 Exmoor Street, London, W10 6BF, UK Tel: +447759420891;
Abstract

Background: Mechanical hypoalgesia has been demonstrated following bouts of acute exercise. The pain relieving properties of exercise thus have the potential to be utilised to help manage painful musculoskeletal conditions, such as osteoarthritis. The mechanisms that underlie this exercise - induced hypoalgesia are poorly understood; as is the type of exercise, the duration and the intensity required to produce hypoalgesia. A complete knowledge of these factors is required before therapeutic exercise programs for pain management can be implemented on an evidence basis in the clinical setting. This research provides a clearly defined exercise protocol which induces hypoalgesia.

Hypothesis: Ten minutes ergometer rowing increases pressure pain thresholds in high performance rowers.

Study design: Laboratory Study, within - group repeated measures

Methods: 20 high performance rowers (13M:7F; mean age: 20.8 years ± 1.74) had pressure pain threshold measurements performed at three anatomical sites (2 local, 1 remote) before and immediately following 10 minutes ergometer rowing at 50-80% estimated VO2max.

Results: Pressure pain thresholds were significantly increased (P < 0.05) at all anatomical locations post - exercise compared to pre - exercise.

Conclusions: High intensity ergometer rowing induces statistically and clinically significant mechanical hypoalgesia at both local and remote sites in high performance rowers.

Clinical relevance: Ergometer rowing is a low impact activity that may prove beneficial in the management of painful joint and muscle conditions, such as osteoarthritis

Keywords

Pain , Rowing , Pressure pain threshold , Exercise

Citation

Simpson AI*, Pearson RG, and Scammell BE (2016) Ten Minutes Ergometer Rowing Exercise Increases Pressure Pain Thresholds in High Performance Rowers. Ann Sports Med Res 3(7): 1087.

INTRODUCTION

Mechanical hypoalgesia has been demonstrated following bouts of acute exercise [1-5]. However, 10 minutes of exercise at 75% VO2max has also been stated to be insufficient to produce exercise induced analgesia [6]. The pain relieving properties of exercise thus have the potential to be utilised to help manage painful musculoskeletal conditions, such as osteoarthritis. The mechanisms that underlie this exercise - induced hypoalgesia are poorly understood, as is the type of exercise, the duration and the intensity required to produce hypoalgesia. A complete knowledge of all these factors is required before therapeutic exercise programs for pain management can be implemented on an evidence basis in the clinical setting. This research provides a clearly defined exercise protocol which induces hypoalgesia. Running and cycling are the most common exercise modalities tested and reported in the literature and have resulted in alterations in pain perception in multiple studies [2,7-10]. A number of painful stimuli have been employed to quantify the hypoalgesia; including ischaemic, thermal, electrical and pressure stimuli. Recent evidence indicates that pressure pain threshold test - retest reliability is robust and consistent [11] and the least variable modality of quantitative sensory testing (QST) [12]. Focal pressure stimuli are also an appropriate modality for the assessment of pain related to orthopaedic and rheumatologic conditions [13]. This study has quantified the effect of rowing on pain perception and more specifically pressure pain thresholds in individual rowers. Only one previous study has reported a similar investigation which demonstrated that rowing in synchrony as a crew increases pain thresholds compared to rowing alone but this study applied ischaemic pain caused by inflation of a sphygmomanometer [14].

Indoor ergometer rowing is a low impact activity with a defined range of movement which minimises twisting, thus can be an appropriate exercise for individuals with knee osteoarthritis (OA) in which impact activities, such as running are contraindicated. Ergometer rowing machines are an accessible piece of equipment to the public in fitness centres and rowing clubs and thus represent an exercise alternative to the more commonly performed running and cycling.

Biomechanical factors including deterioration in muscle strength, particularly quadriceps, and joint malposition are strongly associated with knee OA, its initiation and progression [15]. A cure for OA remains elusive; however, manipulation of contributing factors such as poor muscle strength and high body mass index (BMI) associated with poor physical fitness can be achieved through therapeutic exercise. A recent Cochrane review concluded there is ‘platinum level evidence that land - based therapeutic exercise has at least short term benefit in terms of reduced knee pain and improved physical function for people with knee OA’ [15]. Thus in addition to the advantages of reduced BMI, increased muscle strength and improved general physical fitness that can be achieved through regular exercise there is the potential to manipulate pain perception [16].

This study defined that a quantitative effect from an acute bout of high intensity ergometer rowing altered pain perception, as measured by pressure pain thresholds, in a cohort of high performance rowers. We hypothesised that pressure pain thresholds would increase post-exercise compared to pre - exercise baseline measurements in both men and women.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Participants

A within - group repeated measures design was used. The number of subjects was determined by a difference of 20% in pressure pain thresholds with a power of 0.80 and an alpha of 0.05. This was based on a previous study from our department assessing pressure pain thresholds in patients with osteoarthritis in which a difference in pressure pain threshold of 20% correlated with improved pain perception.

Participants were recruited from university first eight rowing crews and independent high performance rowing crews training for Great Britain rowing squads. Recruitment was made by personal invitation and follow-up email to Boat Club Presidents with subsequent individual consent obtained from all participants. Ethics approval was provided via The University of Nottingham Ethics Committee.

The Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (PAR-Q) was used to screen all athletes for their medical fitness to confirm their capacity to exercise before commencement of testing. In addition, any current joint, bone or muscle pain excluded participants. All athletes attended a 45-minute testing session. For logistical purposes male participants were tested in university facilities and female participants were tested at their training centre. All testing was supervised by a medically-qualified doctor.

Pressure pain threshold testing

Patients received pressure pain threshold testing before and immediately following a period of strenuous exercise. Each participant was introduced to pressure algometry using the intermediate phalanx of the index finger of the right hand as a training site prior to all testing. Triplicate pressure pain threshold measurements were taken at three anatomical sites: the medial joint line of the right knee 1cm medial to the patella tendon; 10cm distal to the joint line on the anteromedial border of the tibia of the right leg; and 4cm distal to the suprasternal notch. Anatomical site location was selected based on a pilot study of the test - retest reliability of pressure pain threshold [17]. Pressure pain threshold testing was conducted in a cyclical fashion ensuring no one site was consecutively tested. Pressure pain threshold was recorded via a button press by the participant.

Pressure was applied from a minimum of 10N/m2 at a constant rate increase of 50N/m2 /second, via a 1cm2 pressure algometer tip to a maximum possible application pressure of 2000N/m2 . The pressure algometer was calibrated before testing using the Somedic 10N calibration weight. Threshold testing was conducted with the participant on a couch at 45 degrees supine with the right knee held at 90 degrees flexion. Pressure was applied perpendicular to the skin.

Exercise protocol

An example of the data collected during the exercise period; distance, power output, strokes per minute and heart rate; are represented graphically in Figure (1). Participants completed 10 minutes of sustained exercise on a rowing machine at an estimated intensity of 50-80% of their VO2max. VO2max was not directly measured using an oxygen consumption device. VO2max was estimated from a formula proposed by Swain et al., [18] based on estimated maximum heart rate (MHR): %MHR = 0.64 x %VO2max + 37

Male participant maximum heart rates (HR) were estimated using the commonly accepted formula:

HR = 220 - Age

Figure 1 Example monitoring of study participant recording distance rowed, power output, strokes per minute (SPM), and heart rate (HR) during the prescribed exercise, between 50-80% estimated VO2max, on a rowing ergometer.

Figure 1: Example monitoring of study participant recording distance rowed, power output, strokes per minute (SPM), and heart rate (HR) during the prescribed exercise, between 50-80% estimated VO2max, on a rowing ergometer.

Female participant maximum HR were estimated using a formula proposed for female athletes by Gulati et al., [19] which takes into account the often overestimation of heart rate of the above formula when applied to females:

HR = 206 - (0.88 x Age)

This resulted in tables being drawn up for all ages within the recruitment criteria of 18-35 years for both male and female participants; 50% VO2max being equivalent to 69% MHR and 80% VO2max equivalent to 82% MHR. For example an 18 year old male 69% MHR was 139 and 82% was 166 beats per minute. This enabled simple monitoring of participant exertion during exercise.

 

Heart rate and blood pressure

Heart rate and blood pressure were recorded at rest with the participant seated pre - exercise using non-invasive techniques. Heart rate was then monitored throughout exercise using a chest strap linked to a display screen visible to the participant, allowing maintenance of an estimated VO2max of between 50-80% based on HR. Heart rate and blood pressure were taken once more at 2 minutes 30 seconds post - exercise to allow completion of pressure pain threshold testing immediately post - exercise and to assess physiological recovery after a defined period of time.

 

Materials

Exercise was conducted on a Model D (Concept 2®, UK) rowing machine with PM3 monitor designed to capture moment by moment rowing performance. Pressure pain threshold was performed using a pressure algometer with a 1cm2 probe area and Sense BOX (Somedic, Sweden). Heart rate was monitored using a chest strap (Pulsar) and body fat percentage was estimated using skin pinch callipers 2.5cm superior to the anterior superior iliac spine. Participants were required to complete the Short - Form 36 (SF-36) quality of life (QoL) questionnaire and the Godin Leisure - Time Exercise questionnaire prior to testing. Following exercise participants rated their perceived exertion on the Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) scale

Design and analyses

Participant pressure pain thresholds were measured in triplicate and mean values of pre - and post - exercise PPT were used for statistical comparison. Dependent measures included pressure pain threshold of the medial joint line of the right knee, of the anterior tibia, and of the sternum.

All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 17.00 software package. Change in PPT was analysed using Student’s paired t-test. Anatomical sites were compared using Friedman test with post - hoc Wilcoxon signed - rank tests plus Bonferroni correction. Correlations between outcome measures were sought using Pearson correlation and male and female participants were compared using Mann - Whitney U test. A P-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Patient demographics and characteristics

Twenty elite rowers participated in this study. All athletes fulfilled the requirements of the PAR-Q and no athletes were excluded for any other reason. They had a mean age of 20.8 years (SD: 1.74) and 7 were female. There was a mean rowing experience of 4.3 years (SD: 2.5) with all participants performing strenuous exercise a minimum of 9 times per week (Mean leisure time score 137.8; SD: 35.4). All participants had a BMI within normal range with a mean of 22.48 kgm-1 (SD: 1.76) and mean estimated body fat was 8.4% (SD: 5.9) with females having a higher mean value than the males (15.6% vs. 4.6%). Mean age was 20.8 years (SD: 1.74) with a range of 19-26. Participant characteristics are summarised in Table (1).

Change in pressure pain threshold

All anatomical sites demonstrated a significant increase in pressure pain threshold post - exercise compared to pre -exercise baseline measures. The difference between pre - and post - exercise PPT were normally distributed allowing data analysis to be treated as parametric, investigated using Normal Q-Q plot. The anterior tibia demonstrated the largest mean increase in PPT of 113.6Nm-2 (95% CI: 83.8 - 143.3Nm-2; P < 0.001) representing a mean percentage increase of 28%. The medial joint line of the right knee demonstrated a mean increase in PPT of 102.1Nm2 (95% CI: 48.1 - 156.1Nm-2; P = 0.002) representing a mean 

Table 1: Mean and standard deviation (SD) values for participant characteristics, years of rowing experience and baseline activity levels assessed using Godin Leisure - Time exercise score.

Parameter mean SD
Gender (n = 20) 13M:7F  
Age (Years) 20.8 1.74
Height (cm) 183.1 8.32
Weight (kg) 75.69 10.24
BMI (kgm-1) 22.48 1.76
Body Fat (%) 8.4 5.9
-Male 4.6 2.7
-Female 15.6 2.3
Rowing Experience (Years) 4.3 2.5
Leisure-Time Score 137.8 35.4

Figure 2 Mean difference in the pain threshold evaluated pre-and post-exercise at each anatomical site (mean, 95% CI).

Figure 2: Mean difference in the pain threshold evaluated pre-and post-exercise at each anatomical site (mean, 95% CI).

percentage increase of 20.1%. The sternum demonstrated the least mean increase in PPT of 56.9Nm-2 (95% CI: 30.4 - 83.5Nm2 ; P < 0.001) - a mean percentage increase of 13.7% (Table 2, Figure 2). A retrospective power analysis of changes in PPT at each anatomical site identified the power was > 96% in each case.

Comparison of anatomical sites

There were significant differences in PPT at all anatomical sites tested. The medial joint line demonstrated significantly higher PPT values at both pre - exercise baseline measurements and post - exercise than the anterior tibia and sternum (P < 0.001). The anterior tibia demonstrated significantly higher PPT pre - and post - exercise than the sternum (P < 0.001). The anterior tibia also demonstrated the greatest absolute and percentage increase in PPT with the sternum demonstrating the least change. Pressure pain threshold measurements at each anatomical site were significantly correlated with values recorded at the other two sites, as demonstrated in Figure (3).

Figure 3 Mean difference between pre and post-exercise pressure pain thresholds correlations between anatomical sites. Pearson Correlation: A Medial Joint Line-Tibia, r = 0.716 (P < 0.001); B Medial Joint Line-Sternum, r = 0.456 (P = 0.043); and C Tibia and Sternum, r = 0.445 (P = 0.05).

Figure 3 Mean difference between pre and post-exercise pressure pain thresholds correlations between anatomical sites. Pearson Correlation: A Medial Joint Line-Tibia, r = 0.716 (P < 0.001); B Medial Joint Line-Sternum, r = 0.456 (P = 0.043); and C Tibia and Sternum, r = 0.445 (P = 0.05).

Comparison of sexes

Male participants had significantly higher PPT pre - and post - exercise than female participants (P < 0.043) apart from the post - exercise medial joint line measurement (P = 0.104). However, there was no significant difference in exercise - induced change in PPT at any site between male and female participants (P > 0.501). Men rowed significantly further (P = 0.002), and had a higher mean power output (P = 0.004). Male and female outcome measures and comparisons are summarised in Table (3).

Relationship between PPT, exercise intensity and physiological measures

Exercise intensity and physiological measures are summarised in Table (4). The change in pressure pain threshold at the sternum was significantly correlated with the distance rowed and power output (P < 0.045). Change in PPT at all other anatomical sites demonstrated no significant correlation with measures of exercise intensity (p > 0.05). Perceived exercise intensity as measured by the Borg Category Rating Scale demonstrated a median value of 13 (Range: 7-18) and did not correlate with any measure.

Years of rowing experience was significantly correlated with resting heart rate (P = 0.021). Estimated body fat percentage was inversely correlated with distance rowed, calories burnt and power output (P < 0.012), however significance is not maintained when male and female participants are analysed separately. Participants reported no untoward outcomes from testing and no participants withdrew from the study.

DISCUSSION

This novel pilot study assessed the effect of 10 minutes high intensity ergometer rowing on pressure pain thresholds in high performance rowers. In the 20 participants tested mean pressure pain threshold increased significantly at all anatomical sites both local and remote. The magnitude of hypoalgesia induced by exercise varied between anatomical site with the anterior tibia demonstrating the greatest increase and the sternum the least. This increase in PPT at both the appendicular sites of the knee and tibia and at the central site of the sternum suggests 

Table 2: Change between the pre and post-exercise pressure pain threshold at each of the Medial Joint Line, Anterior Tibia and Sternum anatomical sites (§ paired Student’s t-test).

Anatomical Site Mean Difference (Nm-2) 95% Confidence Intervals Percentage Difference (%) P Value §
Medial Joint Line 102.1 48.1-156.1 20.1 0.002
Anterior Tibia 113.6 83.8-143.3 28 <0.001
Sternum 56.9 30.4-83.5 13.7 < 0.001

Table 3: Comparison of male and female pressure pain thresholds pre and post-rowing ergometer exercise (Mann-Whitney U, mean values).

Parameter Male Female P value
Pre - Exercise Medial Joint Line PPT (Nm-2) 645.8 363.7 0.029
Post - Exercise Medial Joint Line PPT (Nm-2) 735.8 488.3 0.104
Pre - Exercise Anterior Tibia PPT (Nm-2) 519.2 301.9 0.024
Post - Exercise Anterior Tibia PPT (Nm-2) 634.1 413.1 0.043
Pre - Exercise Sternum PPT (Nm-2) 399.5 197.0 0.016
Post - Exercise Sternum PPT (Nm-2) 463.5 240.7 0.019
Distance Rowed (metres) 2720.1 2481.8 0.002
Power Output (watts) 261.4 200.3 0.004

Table 4: Exercise - related outcomes and physiological measures from all participants (n = 20).

Parameter mean SD
Distance Rowed (m) 2636.68 173.68
Split (/500m) (mins: secs) 1:54.3 0:08.1
Strokes per minute 22.3 2.7
Power Output (Watts) 240.0 44.6
Pre - Exercise HR (bpm) 62 7
Pre - Exercise BP (mmHg) 134/73 13/12
Post - Exercise HR (bpm) 86 18
Post - Exercise BP (mmHg) 134/73 16/13
Perceived Exertion 12 (median) 7-18 (range)

that exercise causes a global increase in PPT and is not limited to sites situated next to large highly exercised muscle tissues. This is reaffirmed by the finding that the degree of hypoalgesia demonstrated is significantly correlated between anatomical sites, signifying that the increase in PPT at the knee is reflected by a proportional increase at the tibia and the sternum, and so forth. This is in agreement with other studies that have found immediate exercise-induced hypoalgesia at both local and remote sites from the exercised muscles [20] .

Subgroup analysis was performed comparing male with female participants. Male participants had significantly higher PPT at all anatomical sites both before and following exercise, apart from the post - exercise medial joint line PPT. This is in agreement with previous published studies demonstrating men having consistently higher PPT than women [21,22]. The anomalous result at the medial joint line is most likely due to the small number of participants in our cohort. Most interestingly, despite the gender difference in absolute PPT values there was no significant difference in the change in PPT induced by exercise. This suggests that gender plays little to no part in exercise -induced hypoalgesia.

Interestingly, the degree of hypoalgesia observed in this cohort did not correlate with perceived exercise intensity as measured by the Borg Category Rating Scale. Although this does not provide a complete assessment of the personal psychological evaluation of exercise by the participant it does suggest more of a physiological response causing hypoalgesia than psychological one. In addition, exercise - induced sternal hypoalgesia was significantly correlated with the physical measures of exercise intensity, including distance rowed, calories burnt and power output, although neither the medial joint line of the knee or the anterior tibia demonstrated any correlation.

A number of mechanisms have been postulated as to how exercise induces a hypoalgesic effect. The most widely lauded hypothesis is that of a centrally - mediated opioid mechanism, however, variable outcomes in studies addressing this hypothesis suggest that this is not an independent mechanism leading to hypoalgesia [1]. The modulation of descending inhibitory pathways within a central pain circuit has also been suggested in which effects are produced through the activation of proprioceptive and muscle afferents [23,24].

CONCLUSION

Ten minutes of indoor ergometer rowing at 50-80% estimated VO2max induces statistically and clinically significant mechanical hypoalgesia at both local and remote sites in high performance rowers. Females had significantly lower pressure pain thresholds than their male counterparts however there was no significant difference between the sexes in the degree of exercise - induced hypoalgesia demonstrated. Only the degree of hypoalgesia observed at the remote site correlated with physical exercise intensity but not perceived exercise intensity and no other measurement correlated with either physical or perceived exercise intensity. Ergometer rowing is a low impact activity which generates hypoalgesia at relatively high exercise intensities and may prove beneficial in the management of painful musculoskeletal conditions, such as OA.

IMPACT

This research supports rowing as an aerobic exercise modality that induces both local and remote pressure hypoalgesia. It specifically defines an exercise intensity of ten minutes at 50- 80% estimated VO2max at which hypoalgesia can clinically and statistically be detected to a significant level in elite athletes. We demonstrated a shorter exercise duration than the majority of previously documented which evoked an exercise - induced hypoalgesia response. Hoffman et al., [6] concluded that 10 minutes of exercise at 75% VO2max was inadequate to alter pain ratings in young, healthy volunteers. Hence, the results of this study continue to add to our understanding of the factors involved in exercise - induced hypoalgesia and progress us closer to the knowledge required to implement tailored exercise programs as pain management therapies in painful musculoskeletal conditions in both the athlete and the patient.

LIMITATIONS

The main limitation of this study is its size. A cohort of 20 participants was used based on a power calculation using data from a previous study we performed on the test - retest reliability of pressure pain threshold in knee osteoarthritis [17]. The small cohort also represented the fact that this was a pilot study and was also a logistically appropriate number considering the niche group of participants we were testing. Despite its size, however, the study has demonstrated clear and significant outcomes for drawing preliminary conclusions which are suitable for the basis of further studies.

This was an uncontrolled study and as such there is no comparison to non - athlete controls. This is a limitation of this study. We accept that further work must be done to discover whether the results obtained are transferable to a non - athlete group and even a potentially elderly, less mobile cohort. The questions thus remain as to whether other cohorts would be able to produce the required exercise intensity to induce hypoalgesia while rowing and to what extent the examined cohorts underlying chronic exercise impacted on the effects seen post - acute exercise.

Throughout this study we used the surrogate marker of heart rate to estimate VO2max. This is a limitation as it does not accurately measure exercise intensity. However, the formula we used to estimate VO2max through heart rate are validated and take into account gender difference. Equipment could be used to accurately measure VO2max during rowing.

FUTURE WORK

This study provides data which will contribute to the development and implementation of further studies. This study measured PPT immediately post - exercise. Future studies would aim to take repeat readings at 5, 10, 15, 30 and 60 minutes post - exercise. Koltyn et al., [3] documented exercise - induced hypoalgesia to persist for at least 15 minutes post - aerobic exercise. Kemppainen et al., [25] found hypoalgesia to persist for approximately 30 minutes, while Hoffman et al., [6] showed an analgesic effect at 5 minutes post - exercise but no significant result at 30 minutes.

This study indicates that hypoalgesia is obtained after 10 minutes of ergometer rowing at 50-80% VO2max. This reduced exercise duration compared to previous studies may be related to the exercise modality studied. Thus, future work would be to determine the shortest duration and lowest VO2max at which ergometer rowing could be performed to statistically and clinically detect hypoalgesia.

We aim to develop this line of research for pain management in knee osteoarthritis patients. Thus, our future work will identify if aspects of this research are translatable to a less active, more elderly cohort, where motivation to perform exercise may prove key [26-28]. This provides a challenge both as a researcher and as a clinician who may look to implement therapeutic exercise in the clinical setting. Hence, the appropriateness of the exercise intensities required to achieve hypoalgesia in a wide range of age groups of varying physical status necessitates investigation.

REFERENCES

1. Droste C, Greenlee MW, Schreck M, Roskamm H. Experimental pain thresholds and plasma beta-endorphin levels during exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1991; 23: 334-342.

2. Janal MN, Colt EW, Clark WC, Glusman M. Pain sensitivity, mood and plasma endocrine levels in man following long-distance running: effects of naloxone. Pain. 1984; 19: 13-25.

3. Koltyn KF, Garvin AW, Gardiner RL, Nelson TF. Perception of pain following aerobic exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1996; 28: 1418- 1421.

4. Markoff RA, Ryan P, Young T. Endorphins and mood changes in longdistance running. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1982; 14:11-15.

5. Slater H, Theriault E, Ronningen BO, Clark R, Nosaka K. Exerciseinduced mechanical hypoalgesia in musculotendinous tissues of the lateral elbow. Man Ther. 2010; 15: 66-73.

6. Hoffman MD, Shepanski MA, Ruble SB, Valic Z, Buckwalter JB, Clifford PS. Intensity and duration threshold for aerobic exercise-induced analgesia to pressure pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004; 85: 1183- 1187.

7. Fuller AK, Robinson ME. A test of exercise analgesia using signal detection theory and a within-subjects design. Percept Mot Skills. 1993; 76: 1299-1310.

8. Guieu R, Blin O, Pouget J, Serratrice G. Nociceptive threshold and physical activity. Can J Neurol Sci. 1992; 19: 69-71.

 9. Kemppainen P, Pertovaara A, Huopaniemi T, Johansson G, Karonen SL. Modification of dental pain and cutaneous thermal sensitivity by physical exercise in man. Brain Res. 1985; 360: 33-40.

10. Pertovaara A, Huopaniemi T, Virtanen A, Johansson G. The influence of exercise on dental pain thresholds and the release of stress hormones. Physiol Behav. 1984; 33: 923-926.

11. Jones DH, Kilgour RD, Comtois AS. Test-retest reliability of pressure pain threshold measurements of the upper limb and torso in young healthy women. J Pain. 2007; 8: 650-656.

12. Wylde V, Palmer S, Learmonth ID, Dieppe P. Test-retest reliability of Quantitative Sensory Testing in knee osteoarthritis and healthy participants. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2011; 19: 655-658.

13. Suokas AK, Walsh DA, McWilliams DF, Condon L, Moreton B, Wylde V, et al. Quantitative sensory testing in painful osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2012; 20: 1075-1085.

14. Cohen EE, Ejsmond-Frey R, Knight N, Dunbar RI. Rowers’ high: behavioural synchrony is correlated with elevated pain thresholds. Biol Lett. 2009; 6: 106-108.

15. Fransen M, McConnell S. Exercise for osteoarthritis of the knee. The Cochrane Collaboration. 2008.

16. Kidd BL, Langford RM, Wodehouse T. Arthritis and pain - Current approaches in the treatment of arthritic pain. Arthritis Res Ther. 2007; 9:214.

17. Simpson A, Wheeler M, Moreton B, Pearson R, Scammell B, Walsh D. A study of the test-retest reliability of pressure pain threshold in knee osteoarthritis. British Journal of Surgery. 2012; 99: 37.

18. Swain DP, Abernathy KS, Smith CS, Lee SJ, Bunn SA. Target heart rates for the development of cardiorespiratory fitness. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1994; 26: 112-116.

19. Gulati M, Shaw LJ, Thisted RA, Black HR, Bairey Merz CN, Arnsdorf MF. Heart rate response to exercise stress testing in asymptomatic women: the St. James women take heart project. Circulation. 2010; 122: 130-137.

20. Staud R, Robinson ME, Price DD. Isometric exercise has opposite effects on central pain mechanisms in fibromyalgia patients compared to normal controls. Pain. 2005; 118: 176-184.

21. Garcia E, Godoy-Izquierdo D, Godoy JF, Perez M, Lopez-Chicheri I. Gender differences in pressure pain threshold in a repeated measures assessment. Psychol Health Med. 2007; 12: 567-579.

22. Neziri AY, Scaramozzino P, Andersen OK, Dickenson AH, ArendtNielsen L, Curatolo M. Reference values of mechanical and thermal pain tests in a pain-free population. Eur J Pain. 2011; 15: 376-383.

23. Ellingson LD, Koltyn KF, Kim JS, Cook DB. Does exercise induce hypoalgesia through conditioned pain modulation? Psychophysiology. 2014; 51: 267-276.

24. Vaegter HB, Handberg G, Graven-Nielsen T. Similarities between exercise-induced hypoalgesia and conditioned pain modulation in humans. Pain. 2014; 155: 158-167.

25. Kemppainen P, Paalasmaa P, Pertovaara A, Alila A, Johansson G. Dexamethasone attenuates exercise-induced dental analgesia in man. Brain Res. 1990; 519: 329-332.

26. Foster NE, Healey EL, Holden MA, Nicholls E, Whitehurst DG, Jowett S, et al. A multicentre, pragmatic, parallel group, randomised controlled trial to compare the clinical and cost-effectiveness of three physiotherapy-led exercise interventions for knee osteoarthritis in older adults: the BEEP trial protocol (ISRCTN: 93634563). BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014; 15: 254.

27. Henriksen M, Klokker L, Graven-Nielsen T, Bartholdy C, Joergensen TS, Bandak E, et al. Exercise Therapy Reduces Pain Sensitivity in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Arthritis and Rheumatism. 2013; 65: 775-775.

28. Skou ST, Roos EM, Laursen MB, Rathleff MS, Arendt-Nielsen L, Simonsen OH, et al. Total knee replacement plus physical and medical therapy or treatment with physical and medical therapy alone: a randomised controlled trial in patients with knee osteoarthritis (the MEDIC-study). BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012; 13: 67

Simpson AI*, Pearson RG, and Scammell BE (2016) Ten Minutes Ergometer Rowing Exercise Increases Pressure Pain Thresholds in High Performance Rowers. Ann Sports Med Res 3(7): 1087.

Received : 03 Aug 2016
Accepted : 30 Aug 2016
Published : 01 Sep 2016
Journals
Annals of Otolaryngology and Rhinology
ISSN : 2379-948X
Launched : 2014
JSM Schizophrenia
Launched : 2016
Journal of Nausea
Launched : 2020
JSM Internal Medicine
Launched : 2016
JSM Hepatitis
Launched : 2016
JSM Oro Facial Surgeries
ISSN : 2578-3211
Launched : 2016
Journal of Human Nutrition and Food Science
ISSN : 2333-6706
Launched : 2013
JSM Regenerative Medicine and Bioengineering
ISSN : 2379-0490
Launched : 2013
JSM Spine
ISSN : 2578-3181
Launched : 2016
Archives of Palliative Care
ISSN : 2573-1165
Launched : 2016
JSM Nutritional Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3203
Launched : 2017
Annals of Neurodegenerative Disorders
ISSN : 2476-2032
Launched : 2016
Journal of Fever
ISSN : 2641-7782
Launched : 2017
JSM Bone Marrow Research
ISSN : 2578-3351
Launched : 2016
JSM Mathematics and Statistics
ISSN : 2578-3173
Launched : 2014
Journal of Autoimmunity and Research
ISSN : 2573-1173
Launched : 2014
JSM Arthritis
ISSN : 2475-9155
Launched : 2016
JSM Head and Neck Cancer-Cases and Reviews
ISSN : 2573-1610
Launched : 2016
JSM General Surgery Cases and Images
ISSN : 2573-1564
Launched : 2016
JSM Anatomy and Physiology
ISSN : 2573-1262
Launched : 2016
JSM Dental Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1548
Launched : 2016
Annals of Emergency Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1017
Launched : 2016
Annals of Mens Health and Wellness
ISSN : 2641-7707
Launched : 2017
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Health Care
ISSN : 2576-0084
Launched : 2018
Journal of Chronic Diseases and Management
ISSN : 2573-1300
Launched : 2016
Annals of Vaccines and Immunization
ISSN : 2378-9379
Launched : 2014
JSM Heart Surgery Cases and Images
ISSN : 2578-3157
Launched : 2016
Annals of Reproductive Medicine and Treatment
ISSN : 2573-1092
Launched : 2016
JSM Brain Science
ISSN : 2573-1289
Launched : 2016
JSM Biomarkers
ISSN : 2578-3815
Launched : 2014
JSM Biology
ISSN : 2475-9392
Launched : 2016
Archives of Stem Cell and Research
ISSN : 2578-3580
Launched : 2014
Annals of Clinical and Medical Microbiology
ISSN : 2578-3629
Launched : 2014
JSM Pediatric Surgery
ISSN : 2578-3149
Launched : 2017
Journal of Memory Disorder and Rehabilitation
ISSN : 2578-319X
Launched : 2016
JSM Tropical Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2578-3165
Launched : 2016
JSM Head and Face Medicine
ISSN : 2578-3793
Launched : 2016
JSM Cardiothoracic Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1297
Launched : 2016
JSM Bone and Joint Diseases
ISSN : 2578-3351
Launched : 2017
JSM Bioavailability and Bioequivalence
ISSN : 2641-7812
Launched : 2017
JSM Atherosclerosis
ISSN : 2573-1270
Launched : 2016
Journal of Genitourinary Disorders
ISSN : 2641-7790
Launched : 2017
Journal of Fractures and Sprains
ISSN : 2578-3831
Launched : 2016
Journal of Autism and Epilepsy
ISSN : 2641-7774
Launched : 2016
Annals of Marine Biology and Research
ISSN : 2573-105X
Launched : 2014
JSM Health Education & Primary Health Care
ISSN : 2578-3777
Launched : 2016
JSM Communication Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3807
Launched : 2016
Annals of Musculoskeletal Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3599
Launched : 2016
Annals of Virology and Research
ISSN : 2573-1122
Launched : 2014
JSM Renal Medicine
ISSN : 2573-1637
Launched : 2016
Journal of Muscle Health
ISSN : 2578-3823
Launched : 2016
JSM Genetics and Genomics
ISSN : 2334-1823
Launched : 2013
JSM Anxiety and Depression
ISSN : 2475-9139
Launched : 2016
Clinical Journal of Heart Diseases
ISSN : 2641-7766
Launched : 2016
Annals of Medicinal Chemistry and Research
ISSN : 2378-9336
Launched : 2014
JSM Pain and Management
ISSN : 2578-3378
Launched : 2016
JSM Women's Health
ISSN : 2578-3696
Launched : 2016
Clinical Research in HIV or AIDS
ISSN : 2374-0094
Launched : 2013
Journal of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Obesity
ISSN : 2333-6692
Launched : 2013
Journal of Substance Abuse and Alcoholism
ISSN : 2373-9363
Launched : 2013
JSM Neurosurgery and Spine
ISSN : 2373-9479
Launched : 2013
Journal of Liver and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2379-0830
Launched : 2014
Journal of Drug Design and Research
ISSN : 2379-089X
Launched : 2014
JSM Clinical Oncology and Research
ISSN : 2373-938X
Launched : 2013
JSM Bioinformatics, Genomics and Proteomics
ISSN : 2576-1102
Launched : 2014
JSM Chemistry
ISSN : 2334-1831
Launched : 2013
Journal of Trauma and Care
ISSN : 2573-1246
Launched : 2014
JSM Surgical Oncology and Research
ISSN : 2578-3688
Launched : 2016
Annals of Food Processing and Preservation
ISSN : 2573-1033
Launched : 2016
Journal of Radiology and Radiation Therapy
ISSN : 2333-7095
Launched : 2013
JSM Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
ISSN : 2578-3572
Launched : 2016
Annals of Clinical Pathology
ISSN : 2373-9282
Launched : 2013
Annals of Cardiovascular Diseases
ISSN : 2641-7731
Launched : 2016
Journal of Behavior
ISSN : 2576-0076
Launched : 2016
Annals of Clinical and Experimental Metabolism
ISSN : 2572-2492
Launched : 2016
Clinical Research in Infectious Diseases
ISSN : 2379-0636
Launched : 2013
JSM Microbiology
ISSN : 2333-6455
Launched : 2013
Journal of Urology and Research
ISSN : 2379-951X
Launched : 2014
Journal of Family Medicine and Community Health
ISSN : 2379-0547
Launched : 2013
Annals of Pregnancy and Care
ISSN : 2578-336X
Launched : 2017
JSM Cell and Developmental Biology
ISSN : 2379-061X
Launched : 2013
Annals of Aquaculture and Research
ISSN : 2379-0881
Launched : 2014
Clinical Research in Pulmonology
ISSN : 2333-6625
Launched : 2013
Journal of Immunology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2333-6714
Launched : 2013
Annals of Forensic Research and Analysis
ISSN : 2378-9476
Launched : 2014
JSM Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
ISSN : 2333-7109
Launched : 2013
Annals of Breast Cancer Research
ISSN : 2641-7685
Launched : 2016
Annals of Gerontology and Geriatric Research
ISSN : 2378-9409
Launched : 2014
Journal of Sleep Medicine and Disorders
ISSN : 2379-0822
Launched : 2014
JSM Burns and Trauma
ISSN : 2475-9406
Launched : 2016
Chemical Engineering and Process Techniques
ISSN : 2333-6633
Launched : 2013
Annals of Clinical Cytology and Pathology
ISSN : 2475-9430
Launched : 2014
JSM Allergy and Asthma
ISSN : 2573-1254
Launched : 2016
Journal of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
ISSN : 2334-2307
Launched : 2013
JSM Sexual Medicine
ISSN : 2578-3718
Launched : 2016
Annals of Vascular Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2378-9344
Launched : 2014
JSM Biotechnology and Biomedical Engineering
ISSN : 2333-7117
Launched : 2013
Journal of Hematology and Transfusion
ISSN : 2333-6684
Launched : 2013
JSM Environmental Science and Ecology
ISSN : 2333-7141
Launched : 2013
Journal of Cardiology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2333-6676
Launched : 2013
JSM Nanotechnology and Nanomedicine
ISSN : 2334-1815
Launched : 2013
Journal of Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders
ISSN : 2475-9473
Launched : 2016
JSM Ophthalmology
ISSN : 2333-6447
Launched : 2013
Journal of Pharmacology and Clinical Toxicology
ISSN : 2333-7079
Launched : 2013
Annals of Psychiatry and Mental Health
ISSN : 2374-0124
Launched : 2013
Medical Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
ISSN : 2333-6439
Launched : 2013
Annals of Pediatrics and Child Health
ISSN : 2373-9312
Launched : 2013
JSM Clinical Pharmaceutics
ISSN : 2379-9498
Launched : 2014
JSM Foot and Ankle
ISSN : 2475-9112
Launched : 2016
JSM Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementia
ISSN : 2378-9565
Launched : 2014
Journal of Addiction Medicine and Therapy
ISSN : 2333-665X
Launched : 2013
Journal of Veterinary Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2378-931X
Launched : 2013
Annals of Public Health and Research
ISSN : 2378-9328
Launched : 2014
Annals of Orthopedics and Rheumatology
ISSN : 2373-9290
Launched : 2013
Journal of Clinical Nephrology and Research
ISSN : 2379-0652
Launched : 2014
Annals of Community Medicine and Practice
ISSN : 2475-9465
Launched : 2014
Annals of Biometrics and Biostatistics
ISSN : 2374-0116
Launched : 2013
JSM Clinical Case Reports
ISSN : 2373-9819
Launched : 2013
Journal of Cancer Biology and Research
ISSN : 2373-9436
Launched : 2013
Journal of Surgery and Transplantation Science
ISSN : 2379-0911
Launched : 2013
Journal of Dermatology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2373-9371
Launched : 2013
JSM Gastroenterology and Hepatology
ISSN : 2373-9487
Launched : 2013
Annals of Nursing and Practice
ISSN : 2379-9501
Launched : 2014
JSM Dentistry
ISSN : 2333-7133
Launched : 2013
Author Information X