Loading

International Journal of Plant Biology & Research

Genetic Diversity and Genetic Uniqueness of Indigenous Myanmar Mango (Sein Ta Lone) Cultivar in Kyaukse District

Research Article | Open Access

  • 1. Microbiology Laboratory, Department of Biotechnology Research, Kyaukse, Myanmar
+ Show More - Show Less
Corresponding Authors
San San Yu, Microbiology Laboratory, Department of Biotechnology Research, Kyaukse, Myanmar, Tel: 95-924-01-379
Abstract

Genetic diversity of 60 Myanmar Sein Ta Lone mango accessions from 21 orchards within three locations in Kyaukse District was studied in this research. 9 Simple Sequence Repeat (SSR) markers were used to study the genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships among the collected mango accessions. Total of 48 scorable bands were observed on amplification with the sizes ranging between 110bp and 369bp. Polymorphic information content (PIC) of 9 SSR markers were 0.265 to 0.74 with an average of 0.421 per marker. The optimal annealing temperature of the primers was 42 to 58°C in range. By using UPGMA cluster analysis, it grouped all the accessions from three locations with a genetic similar coefficient between 0.68-0.96. There was no clone in each orchard and the least dissimilarity was ~ 4% in SM orchard in location 1, SH orchard and SPu orchard in location 2 and STM orchard in location 3. In the present study, analysis of genetic study by means of microsatellite markers showed high genetic diversity of Sein Ta Lone mango accessions and a mix pattern of the accessions within three locations.

Citation

Paing Htway HT, Yee Soe AN, Myint MM, Yi KP, Nyein Chan NN, et al. (2018) Genetic Diversity and Genetic Uniqueness of Indigenous Myanmar Mango (Sein Ta Lone) Cultivar in Kyaukse District. Int J Plant Biol Res 6(3): 1089.

Keywords

•    Genetic diversity
•    Phylogenetic relationships
•    SSR
•    Sein Ta Lone mango
•    Kyaukse

INTRODUCTION

All mango varieties belong to species Mangifera indica Linn which is the most important economic species in the family Anacardiaceae [1]. Mango is originally derived from the IndoMyanmar region during the earlier century and gradually spread to the tropical and subtropical regions of the world. Mango is a diploid fruit tree with 2n = 2x = 40 chromosomes [2]. Its genome size is approximately 4.39 × 108bp [3]. In Myanmar, mango plays a crucial role among the horticultural fruits since antiquity. The popular types of consuming mango in Myanmar are fresh dessert fruit in the ripening stage and salad in the immature stage. The global consumption of mango has increased significantly because of its great nutritional values and bioactive properties [4]. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) reveals that Myanmar is in the sixth rank of seven mango producing countries in ASEAN. In the future, there is the great potential to further increase the quantity of mangoes exported in Myanmar [5]. Fresh mangoes are mainly exported to China by border trade and to Singapore by overseas trade [6,7]. In Myanmar, mango is a popular fruit tree among fruit growers and can grow well in various climate conditions. In 2010-2011, it was reported that the total planted area for mango was 79,908 hectares in Myanmar and the area of fruit harvested was 70,084 hectares with total production of 503,676 metric tons. It occupied 11.85 % of total horticultural areas [8]. Mango is mainly cultivated in the central region (Mandalay and Sagaing Divisions), the southern region (Irrawaddy, Bago and Yangon Divisions), and in the east region (Southern Shan State) in Myanmar. There are about 300 varieties and 20 kinds of mango species in Myanmar and only a few cultivars such as ‘Sein Ta Lone’, ‘Yin Kwe’, ‘Shwe Hin Thar’, and ‘Mya Kyauk’ are famous in the global market for their exportable quality including high sweetness level [9]. Among them ‘Sein Ta Lone’ is the choicest juicy mangoes in Myanmar due to its superior characteristics such as its attractive flavor, taste, aroma, texture, pulp color and nutritional values. It is also one of the most popular and highest demands among the other commercially important fruits of global market. In Myanmar, mango has been cultivated in the 5th to 9th centuries [10], and Sein Ta Lone cultivar was cultivated in Kyaukse region more than 150 years as evident from the fact that it had 150 years old tree in Shwe Inn Phae village, Northern part of Kyaukse Township. ‘Sein Ta Lone’cultivar is also regarded as the pride fruit of Kyaukse.

In the past, Mango breeders used to analyze the diversity of mangoes by using morphological features of cultivars, rootstocks, and landraces. It was a time-consuming process and easily influenced by environmental effects. DNA-based markers are versatile tools for characterizing and studying genetic similarities among land races, varieties and cultivars [11]. Various DNA markers, including restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) [12], random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) Karihaloo et al, Shukla et al. [12,13], amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) [14], and simple sequence repeats (SSRs) [15,16], have been utilized to determine taxonomic identity [16], to estimate genetic diversity [15], and to draw evolutionary histories of mango [14]. Among them, SSRs are widely used as a powerful tool in plant breeding programs as well as in evolutionary studies, because of their high ability for showing diversity among cultivars [17,18]. SSRs are a class of molecular markers based on tandem repeats of short (2- 6bp) DNA sequences. The copy number of repeats is highly polymorphic, even among closely related genotypes. The co dominant and high polymorphic characteristics of microsatellite loci make them useful for cultivar identification [19], and hybrid evaluation [20,21]. The genetic diversity of mangoes is broadening in Myanmar due to the plenty of genetic resources of the species which are still needed to identify. However, there were a few researches based on the study of genetic variations using molecular markers. This study aims to focus on the genetic diversity and uniqueness of Myanmar mango, Sein Ta Lone cultivars which are seemed to be originated in Kyaukse region.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eco geographical survey and sampling

Sample collection surveys were well-planned and selected according to the recommendation of Myanmar Mango Producer Association and key informants from mango producer cooperatives. Sampling sites were conducted in different locations around Kyaukse District which include two major mangoes growing areas (Kyaukse Township and Myittha Township). In Kyaukse Township, the samples were collected from Southern part and Northern part of the Kyaukse Township. Geographical location, soil type and climate conditions of sampling area (Kyaukse District) were shown in Table 1. The mango leaves sample collection was taken during June - July 2016. The numbers of collected samples were varied according to the orchard area and the number of mango plants in its orchards. The geographic location of each of the sample tree was recorded using a handheld global positioning system (GPS) along with the location and shown in Figure 1.

A total of 60 accessions of Myanmar Sein Ta Lone mangoes from 21 orchards in three different locations of Kyaukse District were used in this experiment and the orchard names, locations and accession codes were shown in Table 2. Random sampling strategy was followed for collection of leaf samples and the leaves were maintained in ice box to be transported from the collection sites to Molecular Genetics lab, Biotechnology Research Department, Kyaukse.

DNA extraction

Flushing, healthy and undamaged young, but fully developed collected leaves from each of the trees was washed gently with distilled water to remove all surface particles. Then the midrib of the leaves samples was removed and froze in liquid nitrogen. For molecular analysis, total genomic DNA was extracted from the leaves of Sein Ta Lone mango cultivars using the Cetyltrimethyl-ammonium bromide (CTAB) method with trace modification described by Kit and Chandran. As in brief, 200mg of leaves were ground in ice cold motor and pestle mixing with 500µl of extraction buffer. The extraction buffer consisted of 3% (w/v) CTAB, 1.5 M NaCl, 1% (v/v) β-mercaptoethanol, 20 mM EDTA, 100 m MTris-HCl (pH 8.0), and 3% (w/v) PVP-40 (polyvinyl poly pyrolidone). The homogenates were incubated at 65°C for 30 min with intermittent shaking. The centrifuge tube was brought to room temperature and equal volume of Phenol: Chloroform: Isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1) was added and centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 15 min. Then, DNA was precipitated in ice-cold ethanol by adding one-tenth volume of 3M sodium acetate. The DNA pellet was washed with 70% ethanol and dried. The dried pellet was resuspended in TE 0.1 and then treated with 10mg/ml RNase. DNA concentrations were estimated by comparison with the intensity of standard DNA (1kb ladder) after electrophoresis in 0.8% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide. The purity and detail concentration of extracted DNA were measured by nanophotometer (Implen P330, Munich, Germany).

SSR analysis

24 primers were initially screened for polymorphism and reproducibility using Sein Ta lone cultivars. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification was accomplished in Thermal cycler (PCR-Gene Amp PCR System 9700, Singapore) under the following temperature profile: initial denaturation of 4 min at 94°C followed by 35 cycles of 1 min at 92°C, 45 sec at pairing temperature (variable according to the primers in use), 1 min at 72°C, and final extension of 5 min at 72°C. Based on the number and resolution of bands, 9 out of 24 primers were selected. Primers sequences information of 9 microsatellite markers used in this study were described in Table 3. The amplified products were separated by 8 % Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis with 0.5 x TBE buffer at 100 V (constant voltage) for 1 hrs. The gel was stained in Silver Nitrate solution and using 0.4 M NaOH and 4% Formaldehyde as developer solution. The size of each band was determined by comparing with size standard 100 bp DNA ladder.

Data analysis

For the genetic relatedness among genotypes, all legible, unambiguously and scorable amplified fragments were arranged by binary characters with present (1) and absent (0) of the bands. Polymorphic information content (PIC) was calculated by PIC= (1-∑Pi)2 as described by Nei [22]. Data analysis of Principle component analysis (PCA) and a dendrogram by means of unweight pair group method of arithmetic means (UPGMA) were constructed following the software package NTSYS pc version 2.02 (Numerical Taxonomy System) [23].

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Results

9 out of 24 primers were selected according to their reproducible and polymorphic DNA amplification patterns for the genetic diversity study of Sein Ta Lone mangoes. Total numbers of alleles, unbiased expected heterozyogsity and polymorphic information content (PIC) by 9 SSR primers were shown in Table 4. These primers produced a total of 48 scorable bands on amplification. The polymorphism presented in the 9 microsatellite markers was ranging from 4 to 7 alleles per SSR marker and the average number of scorable loci was 5.33 loci per primer. Mn-19 primer explored the highest number of PIC value while the least polymorphism was described by MiSHR-39 primer. The unbiased expected heterozygosity (UHe) was ranging from 0.261 to 0.734 with the mean of 0.422 for each primer. In this study, all the microsatellite markers showed polymorphic information content (PIC) value (0.259 to 0.74) with an average of 0.421 per marker. The optimal annealing temperature of the 9 SSR primers was 42 to 58°C in range.

The genetic relationship of 60 mango accessions was revealed as dendrogram by using unweight pair group method of arithmetic means (UPGMA) cluster analysis method. Location 1 contained 20 Sein Ta Lone accessions from two orchards in Myittha Town ship and the UPGMA analysis of the accessions from location 1 was shown in Figure 2a. The cluster analysis for location 1 showed that the genetic variation among the Sein Ta Lone mango genotypes was ranging from 0.69 to 0.96 similarity coefficient. Mango accessions in SKK orchard were highly diverse from all accessions in SM orchard. The similarity coefficient of two accessions from SKK orchard was 0.84.SM orchard is a large orchard under the Ministry of Agriculture and we collected 18 Sein Ta Lone accessions from this orchard. The polymorphism of accessions in SM orchard was ranging from 77% to 96% similarity. Among them, SM10 and SM15 were 96% similarity and it was predicted that they were descendant from the same parent seed.

20 mango accessions were collected from 9 orchards in Northern Kyaukse Township and regarded as location 2 and their genetic relatedness was shown in Figure 2b. The genetic dis-similarity between 9 orchards was 4% to 34%. The two mango accessions from SLp orchard were highly spread in this group with 34% dis-similarity from other orchards. The highest dissimilarity of collected samples from 4 orchards in Tha Nge Daw Village was 23%and the smallest dis-similarity was 12% within accessions from SHY and SHK orchard.

The cluster analysis of the accessions in location 3 was shown in Figure 2c. 20 samples were collected from 10 orchards in Southern Kyaukse Township. In location 3, the similarity coefficient was ranging from 0.7 to 0.96. Sky1 accession from Sky orchard was highly diverged not only from other orchards but also within its own orchard. The 3 accessions from SS orchard were also revealed as a separate group. The genetic similarities of the remaining 17 accessions were ranging from 74% to 96%. The two accessions from STM orchard shared high genetic similarity coefficient of 0.96 and formed together

The cluster analysis by UPGMA and the principle component analysis of 60 mango accessions were shown in Figure 3. In cluster analysis, genetic variation of all 60 accessions from 3 locations was 68% to 96 %.The UPGMA cluster analysis showed the lack of group formation according to the sampling sites. In Principle Component Analysis, it was also reinforce that there was mix spreading of location 2 and 3 although accessions from SM orchard from location 1 stand in the separated group.

Discussion

Myanmar Sein Ta Lone mango is one of the choicest cultivars of mango among the horticultural fruits not only in national level but also in global market due to its superior characteristics such as sweet taste, fibreless pulp, good aroma and flavor. The intracultivar diversity of Sein Ta Lone mangoes becomes raised and this leads to major difficulties for mango producers because of its variations in fruit size, shape and quality. Assessment of intracultivar diversity of mangoes has been made through fruit characteristics but it has many limitations because the phenotype depends on environmental and developmental factors. Vieira et al, Krishna and Singh, Kumar et al, Kalia et al. [24-27], reported that molecular characterization was more effective and unlimited by environmental and growth conditions. To the best of our knowledge, data on the regional polymorphism of Sein Ta Lone cultivar in Kyaukse District is scarce or nonexistent. Kyaukse District stands out as a major producer and supplier of Sein Ta Lone cultivar because of its appropriate weather and geographical conditions. In the course of the present study, genetic diversity of Sein Ta Lone mango trees cultivated from three locations in Kyaukse District was assessed with 9 SSR markers. The 48 alleles with distinct banding patterns (alleles) were used to discriminate the Sein Ta Lone mango accessions from Kyaukse District. The PIC value of SSR markers was investigated by different researches with numbers of different markers and different genotypes. Present study showed that the average PIC value was 0.421 and it represented lower PIC value than reported by Hirano et al., Ravishankar et al., Vasugi et al., Dillon et al., [10,28-30].

The extent of genetic diversity among Sein Ta Lone accessions was studied in relation to their locations. From the base of the different locality of each accession and their clustering patterns, there was low interference (it was observed that there was not a significant correlation) between the grouping of the accessions and their locations. Rocha et al., have also reported that there was no accession that could be grouped according to collected sample locations when the genetic diversity ‘Uba’ mango tree was studied by using ISSR markers. Moreover, Karihaloo et al., and Pandit et al. [13,31], showed that mango varieties from different geographical zones in India were slightly differ in genetics and there were rare genetics relatedness about accessions grouping according to their locations of different geographical regions. Based on UPGMA clustering analysis, the genetic diversity of Sein Ta Lone mango cultivar on three locations in Kyaukse region was not quite differed. Mango accessions from SKK (Location 1), SLp orchard (Location 2) and STM orchard (Location 3) were clustered into the same group because of their close genetic similarity. There may be many other factors that can discriminate the variation of mango cultivars. Firstly, mango is cross-pollinated and orchards situated in close proximity have a less chance of pure clones. Secondly, the earlier practices of propagation by seed as well as the desire of the orchardists were equally important. Moreover, a great proportion of the commercial orchards of mangoes were asexually raised through grafting. In Kyaukse District, grafting was popular in mango producing orchards because Sein Ta Lone mango was less resistance to environmental factors and the mango producers desired to get highly resistant mango trees by grafting with other mango cultivars. This may lead to the huge genetic diversity among the Sein Ta Lone cultivar. The cluster analysis revealed that the genetic variation between Sein Ta Lone cultivar in Kyaukse district was 0.68 to 0.96 similarity coefficient and it was a huge variation within Sein Ta Lone cultivar. This study also discriminated the homogeneity and heterogeneity within the orchards. There was no clone in each orchard and the least dissimilarity was 4% in SM orchard in location 1, SH orchard and SPu orchard in location 2 and STM orchard in location3. In the present study, the analysis of genetic study by means of microsatellite markers showed high genetic diversity of Sein Ta Lone mango accessions and a mix pattern of different locations. We can also found that there was no pure clone among the Sein Ta Lone mango accessions collected from 3 locations in Kyaukse District. Therefore, the selection and maintenance of germplasm resources is also an importance factor for genetic diversity. The genetic diversity of Myanmar Sein Ta Lone Mango cultivar by means of SSR profiling studies may give some insight into the selection of genetically distinct and elite accessions of these cultivars.

CONCLUSION

The present investigation revealed the usefulness of microsatellite SSR markers in genetic diversity analysis of Sein Ta Lone mango cultivars in Kyaukse District, Myanmar. On the base of the results, it can be assumed that the location differentiation has not highly influenced the genetic diversity of Sein Ta Lone mango cultivars. Moreover, the planting of grafted mango trees to evaluate the superior phenotypic characteristics for several years may lead to the absence of 100% similarity among accessions. In the further study, it will be needed to elucidate the genetic diversity of Myanmar mango varieties from different regions of Myanmar.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Authors gratefully acknowledge to Biotechnology Research Department, Ministry of Education, and Kyaukse for providing necessary laboratory facilities and financial supports to carry out this research work. Special thanks are due to Mango Designer U Myint Htwe and Mango orchardists in Kyaukse District for their helpful cooperation. We also acknowledge Dr. Tin Mar lynn for her kind and valuable supports. Great thanks to all colleagues at Molecular Genetics Lab, BRD.

REFERENCES

1. Singh L. The Mango. Botany, cultivation, and utilization. The Mango. Botany, cultivation, and utilization. 1960.

2. Mukherjee S. The mango-Its botany, cultivation, uses and future improvement, especially as observed in India. Eco Bot. 1953; 7: 130- 162.

3. Arumuganathan K, Earle E. Nuclear DNA content of some important plant species. Plant molecular biology reporter. 1991; 9: 208-218.

4. Poovarodom S, Haruenkit R, Vearasilp S, Namiesnik J, Cvikrová M, Martincová O, et al. Comparative characterisation of durian, mango and avocado. Int J Food Sci Technol. 2010; 45: 921-929.

5. Department of Border Trade. Ministry of Commerce. Department of Border Trade Report. 2012.

6. Wai KS. Review and analysis of the Competitiveness of Myanmar mango and chilli, Commodity Competitiveness Study for the Integration of Myanmar’s Agriculture into the ASEAN. 2004.

7. Win SS. Commercially Mango Production and Trading. 2008; 43.

8. Ministry of Agriculture and Irrigation. Department of Agriculture (DOA), Myanmar Horticultural Crops Production Report. 2010-2011.

9. Soe TT. Studies on Improved Methods of Postharvest Storage of Mango Fruits. 2006.

10. Hirano R, Htun Oo T, Watanabe K. Myanmar mango landraces reveal genetic uniqueness over common cultivars from Florida, India, and Southeast Asia. Genome. 2010; 53: 321-330.

11. Dunemann F. Molecular classification of Malus with RAPD markers Progress in temperate fruit breeding. 1994; 1: 295-300.

12. Shukla M, Babu R, Mathur VK, Srivastava DK. Diverse genetic bases of Indian polyembryonic and monoembryonic mango (Mangifera indica L) cultivars. Curr Sci. 2004; 85: 870-871.

13. Karihaloo JL, Dwivedi YK, Archak S, Gaikwad AB. Analysis of genetic diversity of Indian mango cultivars using RAPD markers. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol. 2015; 78: 285-289.

14. Yamanaka N, Hasran M, Xu DH, Tsunematsu H, Idris S, Ban T. Genetic Relationship and Diversity of Four Mangifera Species Revealed through AFLP Analysis. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2006; 53: 949-954.

15. Viruel M, Escribano P, Barbieri M, Ferri M, Hormaza J. Fingerprinting, embryo type and geographic differentiation in mango (Mangifera indica L., Anacardiaceae) with microsatellites. Mol Breed. 2005; 15: 383-393.

16. Schnell R, Brown JS, Olano C, Meerow A, Campbell R, Kuhn D. Mango Genetic Diversity Analysis and Pedigree Inferences for Florida Cultivars Using Microsatellite Markers. Hort Sci. 2006; 41: 993.

17. Mhameed S, Sharon D, Hillel J, Lahav E, Kaufman D, Lavi U. Level of heterozygosity and mode of inheritance of variable number of tandem repeat loci in avocado. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 1996; 121: 768-772.

18. Levi A, Rowland L. Identifying blueberry cultivars and evaluating their genetic relationships using randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and simple sequence repeat-(SSR-) anchored primers. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 1997; 122: 74-78.

19. Chiou CY, Chiang YC, Chen CH, Yen CR, Lee SR, Lin YS, et al. Development and characterization of 38 polymorphic microsatellite markers from an economically important fruit tree, the Indian jujube. Am J Bot. 2012; 99: 199-202.

20. Liao PC, Tsai CC, Chou CH, Chiang YC. Introgression between cultivars and wild populations of Momordica charantia L. (Cucurbitaceae) in Taiwan. Int J Mol Sci. 2012; 13: 6469-6491.

21. Chiang YC, Huang BH, Chang CW, Wan YT, Lai SJ, Huang S, et al. Asymmetric introgression in the horticultural living fossil Cycas Sect. Asiorientales using a genome-wide scanning approach. Int J Mol Sci. 2013; 14: 8228-8251.

22. Masatoshi Nei. Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1973; 70: 3321-3323.

23. Rohlf F. NTSYS-pc Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System. 1988; 1-43

24. Vieira EA, Carvalho FI, Bertan I, Kopp MM, Zimmer PD, Benin G, et al. Association between genetic distances in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) as estimated by AFLP and morphological markers. Genet Mol Biol. 2007; 30: 392-399.

25. Krishna H, Singh S. Biotechnological advances in mango (Mangifera indica L.) and their future implication in crop improvement: a review. Biotechnol Adv. 2007; 25: 223-243.

26. Kumar P, Gupta V, Misra A, Modi D, Pandey B. Potential of Molecular Markers in Plant Biotechnology. Plant Omics. 2009; 2: 141-162.

27. Kalia RK, Rai MK, Kalia S, Singh R, Dhawan A. Microsatellite markers: an overview of the recent progress in plants. Euphytica. 2011; 177: 309-334.

28. Ravishankar KV, Mani BHR, Anand L, Dinesh MR. Development of new microsatellite markers from Mango (Mangifera indica) and crossspecies amplification. Am J Bot. 2011; 98: 96-99.

29. Vasugi C, Dinesh M, Sekar K, Shivashankara K, Padmakar B, Ravishankar K. Genetic diversity in unique indigenous mango accessions (Appemidi) of the Western Ghats for certain fruit characteristics. Curr Sci. 2012; 103: 199-207.

30. Dillon NL, Bally IS, Wright CL, Hucks L, Innes DJ, Dietzgen RG. Genetic diversity of the Australian national mango genebank. Sci Hortic. 2013; 150: 213-226.

31. Pandit SS, Mitra S, Giri AP, Pujari KH, Patil BP, Jambhale ND, et al. Genetic diversity analysis of mango cultivars using inter simple sequence repeat markers. Curr Sci. 2007; 93: 1135-1141.

Received : 14 Mar 2018
Accepted : 28 Mar 2018
Published : 29 Mar 2018
Journals
Annals of Otolaryngology and Rhinology
ISSN : 2379-948X
Launched : 2014
JSM Schizophrenia
Launched : 2016
Journal of Nausea
Launched : 2020
JSM Internal Medicine
Launched : 2016
JSM Hepatitis
Launched : 2016
JSM Oro Facial Surgeries
ISSN : 2578-3211
Launched : 2016
Journal of Human Nutrition and Food Science
ISSN : 2333-6706
Launched : 2013
JSM Regenerative Medicine and Bioengineering
ISSN : 2379-0490
Launched : 2013
JSM Spine
ISSN : 2578-3181
Launched : 2016
Archives of Palliative Care
ISSN : 2573-1165
Launched : 2016
JSM Nutritional Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3203
Launched : 2017
Annals of Neurodegenerative Disorders
ISSN : 2476-2032
Launched : 2016
Journal of Fever
ISSN : 2641-7782
Launched : 2017
JSM Bone Marrow Research
ISSN : 2578-3351
Launched : 2016
JSM Mathematics and Statistics
ISSN : 2578-3173
Launched : 2014
Journal of Autoimmunity and Research
ISSN : 2573-1173
Launched : 2014
JSM Arthritis
ISSN : 2475-9155
Launched : 2016
JSM Head and Neck Cancer-Cases and Reviews
ISSN : 2573-1610
Launched : 2016
JSM General Surgery Cases and Images
ISSN : 2573-1564
Launched : 2016
JSM Anatomy and Physiology
ISSN : 2573-1262
Launched : 2016
JSM Dental Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1548
Launched : 2016
Annals of Emergency Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1017
Launched : 2016
Annals of Mens Health and Wellness
ISSN : 2641-7707
Launched : 2017
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Health Care
ISSN : 2576-0084
Launched : 2018
Journal of Chronic Diseases and Management
ISSN : 2573-1300
Launched : 2016
Annals of Vaccines and Immunization
ISSN : 2378-9379
Launched : 2014
JSM Heart Surgery Cases and Images
ISSN : 2578-3157
Launched : 2016
Annals of Reproductive Medicine and Treatment
ISSN : 2573-1092
Launched : 2016
JSM Brain Science
ISSN : 2573-1289
Launched : 2016
JSM Biomarkers
ISSN : 2578-3815
Launched : 2014
JSM Biology
ISSN : 2475-9392
Launched : 2016
Archives of Stem Cell and Research
ISSN : 2578-3580
Launched : 2014
Annals of Clinical and Medical Microbiology
ISSN : 2578-3629
Launched : 2014
JSM Pediatric Surgery
ISSN : 2578-3149
Launched : 2017
Journal of Memory Disorder and Rehabilitation
ISSN : 2578-319X
Launched : 2016
JSM Tropical Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2578-3165
Launched : 2016
JSM Head and Face Medicine
ISSN : 2578-3793
Launched : 2016
JSM Cardiothoracic Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1297
Launched : 2016
JSM Bone and Joint Diseases
ISSN : 2578-3351
Launched : 2017
JSM Bioavailability and Bioequivalence
ISSN : 2641-7812
Launched : 2017
JSM Atherosclerosis
ISSN : 2573-1270
Launched : 2016
Journal of Genitourinary Disorders
ISSN : 2641-7790
Launched : 2017
Journal of Fractures and Sprains
ISSN : 2578-3831
Launched : 2016
Journal of Autism and Epilepsy
ISSN : 2641-7774
Launched : 2016
Annals of Marine Biology and Research
ISSN : 2573-105X
Launched : 2014
JSM Health Education & Primary Health Care
ISSN : 2578-3777
Launched : 2016
JSM Communication Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3807
Launched : 2016
Annals of Musculoskeletal Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3599
Launched : 2016
Annals of Virology and Research
ISSN : 2573-1122
Launched : 2014
JSM Renal Medicine
ISSN : 2573-1637
Launched : 2016
Journal of Muscle Health
ISSN : 2578-3823
Launched : 2016
JSM Genetics and Genomics
ISSN : 2334-1823
Launched : 2013
JSM Anxiety and Depression
ISSN : 2475-9139
Launched : 2016
Clinical Journal of Heart Diseases
ISSN : 2641-7766
Launched : 2016
Annals of Medicinal Chemistry and Research
ISSN : 2378-9336
Launched : 2014
JSM Pain and Management
ISSN : 2578-3378
Launched : 2016
JSM Women's Health
ISSN : 2578-3696
Launched : 2016
Clinical Research in HIV or AIDS
ISSN : 2374-0094
Launched : 2013
Journal of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Obesity
ISSN : 2333-6692
Launched : 2013
Journal of Substance Abuse and Alcoholism
ISSN : 2373-9363
Launched : 2013
JSM Neurosurgery and Spine
ISSN : 2373-9479
Launched : 2013
Journal of Liver and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2379-0830
Launched : 2014
Journal of Drug Design and Research
ISSN : 2379-089X
Launched : 2014
JSM Clinical Oncology and Research
ISSN : 2373-938X
Launched : 2013
JSM Bioinformatics, Genomics and Proteomics
ISSN : 2576-1102
Launched : 2014
JSM Chemistry
ISSN : 2334-1831
Launched : 2013
Journal of Trauma and Care
ISSN : 2573-1246
Launched : 2014
JSM Surgical Oncology and Research
ISSN : 2578-3688
Launched : 2016
Annals of Food Processing and Preservation
ISSN : 2573-1033
Launched : 2016
Journal of Radiology and Radiation Therapy
ISSN : 2333-7095
Launched : 2013
JSM Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
ISSN : 2578-3572
Launched : 2016
Annals of Clinical Pathology
ISSN : 2373-9282
Launched : 2013
Annals of Cardiovascular Diseases
ISSN : 2641-7731
Launched : 2016
Journal of Behavior
ISSN : 2576-0076
Launched : 2016
Annals of Clinical and Experimental Metabolism
ISSN : 2572-2492
Launched : 2016
Clinical Research in Infectious Diseases
ISSN : 2379-0636
Launched : 2013
JSM Microbiology
ISSN : 2333-6455
Launched : 2013
Journal of Urology and Research
ISSN : 2379-951X
Launched : 2014
Journal of Family Medicine and Community Health
ISSN : 2379-0547
Launched : 2013
Annals of Pregnancy and Care
ISSN : 2578-336X
Launched : 2017
JSM Cell and Developmental Biology
ISSN : 2379-061X
Launched : 2013
Annals of Aquaculture and Research
ISSN : 2379-0881
Launched : 2014
Clinical Research in Pulmonology
ISSN : 2333-6625
Launched : 2013
Journal of Immunology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2333-6714
Launched : 2013
Annals of Forensic Research and Analysis
ISSN : 2378-9476
Launched : 2014
JSM Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
ISSN : 2333-7109
Launched : 2013
Annals of Breast Cancer Research
ISSN : 2641-7685
Launched : 2016
Annals of Gerontology and Geriatric Research
ISSN : 2378-9409
Launched : 2014
Journal of Sleep Medicine and Disorders
ISSN : 2379-0822
Launched : 2014
JSM Burns and Trauma
ISSN : 2475-9406
Launched : 2016
Chemical Engineering and Process Techniques
ISSN : 2333-6633
Launched : 2013
Annals of Clinical Cytology and Pathology
ISSN : 2475-9430
Launched : 2014
JSM Allergy and Asthma
ISSN : 2573-1254
Launched : 2016
Journal of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
ISSN : 2334-2307
Launched : 2013
Annals of Sports Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2379-0571
Launched : 2014
JSM Sexual Medicine
ISSN : 2578-3718
Launched : 2016
Annals of Vascular Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2378-9344
Launched : 2014
JSM Biotechnology and Biomedical Engineering
ISSN : 2333-7117
Launched : 2013
Journal of Hematology and Transfusion
ISSN : 2333-6684
Launched : 2013
JSM Environmental Science and Ecology
ISSN : 2333-7141
Launched : 2013
Journal of Cardiology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2333-6676
Launched : 2013
JSM Nanotechnology and Nanomedicine
ISSN : 2334-1815
Launched : 2013
Journal of Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders
ISSN : 2475-9473
Launched : 2016
JSM Ophthalmology
ISSN : 2333-6447
Launched : 2013
Journal of Pharmacology and Clinical Toxicology
ISSN : 2333-7079
Launched : 2013
Annals of Psychiatry and Mental Health
ISSN : 2374-0124
Launched : 2013
Medical Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
ISSN : 2333-6439
Launched : 2013
Annals of Pediatrics and Child Health
ISSN : 2373-9312
Launched : 2013
JSM Clinical Pharmaceutics
ISSN : 2379-9498
Launched : 2014
JSM Foot and Ankle
ISSN : 2475-9112
Launched : 2016
JSM Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementia
ISSN : 2378-9565
Launched : 2014
Journal of Addiction Medicine and Therapy
ISSN : 2333-665X
Launched : 2013
Journal of Veterinary Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2378-931X
Launched : 2013
Annals of Public Health and Research
ISSN : 2378-9328
Launched : 2014
Annals of Orthopedics and Rheumatology
ISSN : 2373-9290
Launched : 2013
Journal of Clinical Nephrology and Research
ISSN : 2379-0652
Launched : 2014
Annals of Community Medicine and Practice
ISSN : 2475-9465
Launched : 2014
Annals of Biometrics and Biostatistics
ISSN : 2374-0116
Launched : 2013
JSM Clinical Case Reports
ISSN : 2373-9819
Launched : 2013
Journal of Cancer Biology and Research
ISSN : 2373-9436
Launched : 2013
Journal of Surgery and Transplantation Science
ISSN : 2379-0911
Launched : 2013
Journal of Dermatology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2373-9371
Launched : 2013
JSM Gastroenterology and Hepatology
ISSN : 2373-9487
Launched : 2013
Annals of Nursing and Practice
ISSN : 2379-9501
Launched : 2014
JSM Dentistry
ISSN : 2333-7133
Launched : 2013
Author Information X