Loading

JSM Anatomy and Physiology

CT Images of the Scapula Taken with Reduced dose can Yield Segmented Models of Sufficient Accuracy - A Pilot Study

Research Article | Open Access | Volume 2 | Issue 2

  • 1. Organ Systems, The Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium
  • 2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Universitaire ziekenhuizen Leuven, Belgium
  • 3. Department of Traumatology, Universitaire ziekenhuizen Leuven, Belgium
+ Show More - Show Less
Corresponding Authors
MichielHerteleer, Organ Systems, The Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium Tel: 32496042542; Fax:3216344614;
Abstract

Introduction: 3D imaging techniques are increasingly being used for pre-operative planning and the production of patient specific implants or guides. In orthopedics and traumatology these images are segmented out of CT scans as they provide the best quality bone images. However, these CT scans expose patients to high dosages of ionizing radiation which has a baleful influence on their health. In this pilot study we investigate the influence of tube current reduction on the segmentation accuracy of the scapula.

Materials and methods: A human cadaver was CT scanned multiple times while reducing tube current amperage. The images were segmented using 2 different segmentation methods (n=28). Subsequently the scapula was dissected and all soft tissues were removed. An optical laser scan of the dissected scapula was aligned and compared with the segmented meshes of the different CT scans. Radiation dosage, 3D distance, volume and other parameters were analyzed.

Results: All segmented meshes differed statistically significantly from the optical scan (p<0.001). Apart from one, all meshes had a larger volume than the reference mesh (n=27). The average 3D deviation varied between 1.17 mm (Max) -0.759mm (Min) and the total average 3D deviation was -0.45mm (+/- 0.38mm SD).

The mesh accuracy remained fairly constant with diminishing tube currents. Radiation dosages were reduced from 7.1 to 0.3 mSv. Only the automatically generated meshes, corresponding with the lowest tube currents, had large surface deviations. The semi-automatically generated meshes had deviation values within normal averages.

Conclusion: CT Tube current can be largely reduced without losing the surface segmentation accuracy of segmented scapula meshes.

Keywords
  • Scapula
  • Segmentation
  • Low-dose CT
  • 3D Radiation
Citation

Herteleer M, Vancleef S, Sloten JV, Nijs S (2017) CT Images of the Scapula Taken with Reduced dose can Yield Segmented Models of Sufficient Accuracy - a Pilot Study. JSM Anat Physiol 2(2): 1011.

INTRODUCTION

The use of CT scans has become a commonly used tool in the diagnostic and pre-operative assessment of orthopedic and trauma patients. These CT images are used more and more to make 3D reconstructions, aiding the physician in assessing the anatomy and pathology; and for the design of custom made orthopedic implants. Commercial software packages allow surgeons and engineers to segment these images and use the resulting 3D models to improve patient care and improve research quality [1-3]. However, there is a downside regarding the increased use of CT scans. The ionizing radiation dosage of 1 CT scan of de shoulder relates to more or less 25 chest x-rays of the thorax [4]. Orthopedic and trauma patients are often young and could therefore benefit more from a radiation reduction in their musculoskeletal diagnostic work up.

Studies have inspected the quality and accuracy of image segmentation modules for long bone structures. They demonstrate a high segmentation accuracy for musculoskeletal scans regarding the tibia and femur [5,6]. Kwon et al., demonstrated that the distances and angles measured on 3D reconstructed models of scapula images show high inter & intra observer variability rates [7].

To our knowledge there are no studies that have investigated the influence of CT dose reduction on the image quality and especially on how the dose reduction influences the segmentation quality of the scapula. The scapula is an interesting bone since its thin body might be more influenced by a dose reduction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

After getting approval from the local ethical committee (Ethisch Committee, KU Leuven, Belgium) we obtained 1 fresh frozen cadaver from the human body donation program of the KU Leuven. A standardized Axial CT shoulder was obtained on a clinical CT scan, Siemens Somatom Force (Siemens AG, Erlangen, Germany), dual source/dual energy, 192-slice. The scan covered the entire glenohumeral joint and the scan length was determined by a radiological assistant as if it were a normal patient. While maintaining all CT scan settings the tube-current was reduced gradually until the lowest current at which the CT scan would function was obtained (Table 1). In total 7 CT scans were obtained from the same cadaveric specimen.

The right scapula was dissected, cleaned manually and then boiled to remove the remaining fat. It was then optically scanned with the Nikon LC60Dx (Nikon metrology, UK) mounted on a coordinate measuring machine (MC16, Coord3, S.p.A, Turin, Italy). The manufacturer reports a surface accuracy between 6 and 36 microns. The obtained point cloud was reconstructed into an STL file using Focus inspect (Nikon Metrology, UK) and then imported into 3-matic (3-matic Research 11.0, Materialise NV, Leuven, Belgium) where a mesh repair was performed. Mesh abnormalities were repaired using the different fix methods such as: remove overlapping triangles, invert normal and fill holes.

The obtained CT scans were imported into Mimics Research 19.0 (Materialise NV, Leuven, Belgium) and segmented by 2 researchers each using a different protocol. The 2 different segmentation protocols were applied to images in the bone and in the soft tissue window, resulting in 4 surface meshes per CT scan.

MH used an automated segmentation protocol where a standard bone mask threshold (226-3071) was applied to axial the CT images. Then, a region growing method was performed to isolate the scapula. The 3D models were calculated from the masks using the high quality segmentation settings. The resulting STL file was then imported in to 3-matic (3-matic Research 11.0, Materialise NV, Leuven, Belgium) and a wrap operation with a gap closing distance of 4mm, smallest detail of 0.1mm, protection of thin walls and a resulting offset of 0.07mm were performed. This was done to create a full and uniform shell. Where necessary, manual fixing methods were applied to create a single shell mesh.

SVC used a semi-automated segmentation method which can be found as the CT bone module. A point on the cortex of the scapula was selected on the CT scan and then automatically filled using the automated smart expand and bone filling module. The 3D models were calculated from the masks using the high quality segmentation settings and the resulting STL file was then imported in to 3-matic (3-matic Research 11.0, Materialise NV, Leuven, Belgium) without additional wrapping. No wrap operation was applied because the semi-automated segmentation method produces meshes without inner surfaces [6].

The meshes were aligned with the optically obtained scapula using a best fit method. A signed global part comparison analysis was used to determine the 3D distance between the reference mesh and the segmented mesh. The distance values were imported into GraphPad Prism (version 7.00 for Windows, GraphPad Software, La Jolla California USA).

Statistiscs

Data were analyzed using Graph pad PRISM. Descriptive statistics were calculated based on frequency tables and histograms were plotted as line graphs. The mean deviations were compared using the one-way ANOVA test. When the comparison was limited to 2 groups a t-test was used.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Results

Mesh difference: All meshes were statistically significantly different from the optically scanned mesh (ground truth) using a one-way ANOVA test with multiple comparisons (p<0.0001). All segmented meshes, apart from MH 7B had larger volumes than the optically scanned reference meshes. This under sizing is due to a large structural volume loss as a consequence of the initial segmentation (Figure 1).

Figure 1 Illustration of some of the segmented CT scans. A visual analysis  shows that there are no large deformations when the radiation dosage is  reduced. SVC 1B provided the highest surface accuracy which is demonstrated  in (Figure 2). The automated segmentation by MH 7B shows a clear volume loss  in the body of the scapula. The visually perceived surface roughness of SVC 7B is  remarkably larger than that of the other surface meshes..

Figure 1: Illustration of some of the segmented CT scans. A visual analysis shows that there are no large deformations when the radiation dosage is reduced. SVC 1B provided the highest surface accuracy which is demonstrated in (Figure 2). The automated segmentation by MH 7B shows a clear volume loss in the body of the scapula. The visually perceived surface roughness of SVC 7B is remarkably larger than that of the other surface meshes..

Bone window vs soft tissue window: The 3D deviations of all meshes segmented from the CT Images in the soft tissue window were statistically significantly different from meshes segmented from the bone window (p<0.001). From a visual point of view there seemed to be an increased amount of noise on the surface meshes in regard to lower radiation dose. This noise was more prominent for the models segmented in the bone window compared with the soft tissue window (Figure 1).

Radiation Dosage and surface accuracy: The radiation dosage was computed by a medical physicist based on the scan parameters and the scanned volume (Table 1).

Table 1: CT scan settings.

CT

kV

mAs

ref

CTDI

DLP

Scan length

Pitch

ST

Pixel

 

 

 

 

(mGy)

(mGy.cm)

(cm)

 

(mm)

(mm)

1

110

408

516

21,37

379,1

18

0,8

0,6

0,85x0,85

2

110

266

326

13,92

246,9

18

0,8

0,6

0,85x0,85

3

110

196

246

10,26

182

18

0,8

0,6

0,85x0,85

4

110

136

167

7,12

126,4

18

0,8

0,6

0,85x0,85

5

110

75

87

3,92

69,6

18

0,8

0,6

0,85x0,85

6

110

43

46

2,29

40,6

18

0,8

0,6

0,85x0,85

7

110

18

18

1,02

19,4

18

1,05

0,6

0,85x0,85

Dosages were corrected for male and female cadavers due to the close proximity of the breast region. As expected the effective dose decreased linearly with decreasing tube currents. The mean deviation of our segmented models however did not decrease linearly but remained fairly constant apart from the segmentations lowest radiation dosages MH (Figure 2) (Table 2) [8].

Figure 2 Influence of the radiation dosage on the mean deviation of the surface  meshes. The mean deviation of the models segmented in the soft tissue window  is larger than those segmented in the bone window. The mean deviation of the  meshes segmented in the soft tissue window is less influenced by the lowest  radiation dosage.

Figure 2: Influence of the radiation dosage on the mean deviation of the surface meshes. The mean deviation of the models segmented in the soft tissue window is larger than those segmented in the bone window. The mean deviation of the meshes segmented in the soft tissue window is less influenced by the lowest radiation dosage.

Table 2: Radiation dosages of the CT scans.

CT

Effective Dose Man

Effective Dose Woman

 

(mSv)

(mSv)

1

6,9

7,3

2

4,5

4,8

3

3,3

3,5

4

2,3

2,4

5

1,3

1,3

6

0,7

0,8

7

0,3

0,3

Mesh volume: All segmented meshes were significantly larger than the optically scanned reference mesh (p<0.0001). The mean volumes between the meshes by MH and SVC were not statistically significantly different (p=0.7594). The meshes based on the automatic segmentation protocol (MH) tended to have larger volumes than the meshes created by the semi-automatic CT-bone module (SVC) (Figure 3).

Figure 3 All meshes (apart MH 7B) have larger volumes than the optically laser  scanned reference mesh. The fully automated segmented mesh from the lowest  dosage bone window scan (7B) has a largely reduced volume. This can also be  clearly seen in (Figure 1).

Figure 3: All meshes (apart MH 7B) have larger volumes than the optically laser scanned reference mesh. The fully automated segmented mesh from the lowest dosage bone window scan (7B) has a largely reduced volume. This can also be clearly seen in (Figure 1).

General comparison of the surface meshes: The mean 3D distance of the meshes created using the automated segmentation protocol (MH) vary between -0.44mm & 1.17mm for the bone window and -0.54mm & -0.57 mm for the soft tissue window (Table 3) (Figure 4).

Table 3: Deviation from the optical mesh (automatically segmented meshes).

MH Bone Window

CT

Mean (mm)

SD

(mm)

Max (mm)

Min (mm)

n

1B

-0,44

0,70

2,85

-2,45

28261

2B

-0,50

0,71

3,16

-2,65

28261

3B

-0,49

0,73

3,14

-2,62

28261

4B

-0,49

0,73

3,01

-2,71

28261

5B

-0,51

0,76

2,99

-2,68

28261

6B

-0,54

0,76

3,08

-2,57

28261

7B

1,17

2,90

19,18

-1,48

28261

MH Soft Tissue Window

1ST

-0,57

0,91

3,37

-3,32

28261

2ST

-0,55

0,92

3,13

-3,18

28261

3ST

-0,54

0,94

3,10

-3,20

28261

4ST

-0,53

0,94

3,12

-3,22

28261

5ST

-0,54

0,94

3,14

-3,23

28261

6ST

-0,56

0,95

3,23

-3,50

28261

7ST

-0,54

0,95

3,15

-3,39

28261

Figure 4 The graphs in figure 4 show the distribution of the deviation for  the semi automatically generated meshes (MH). The distribution of the curves  is similar although there clearly is a visual difference between MH 7B and the  other meshes. This is due to the fact that the calculations are based on the  amount of triangles of the meshes. The part of the body of the scapula which  has disappeared (Figure 1) has only a small amount of triangles compared with  more complex shapes such as the acromion. The extrema and the width of the  graph give a good appreciation on the general quality of the mesh (Table 3).

Figure 4: The graphs in figure 4 show the distribution of the deviation for the semi automatically generated meshes (MH). The distribution of the curves is similar although there clearly is a visual difference between MH 7B and the other meshes. This is due to the fact that the calculations are based on the amount of triangles of the meshes. The part of the body of the scapula which has disappeared (Figure 1) has only a small amount of triangles compared with more complex shapes such as the acromion. The extrema and the width of the graph give a good appreciation on the general quality of the mesh (Table 3).

The mean 3D distance of the meshes created using the semi automated segmentation protocol (SVC) vary between-0.44mm&-0.27mm for the bone window and -0.48 mm&-0.38 mm for the soft tissue window (Table 4) (Figure 5).

Table 4: Deviation from the optical mesh (semi-automatically segmented meshes).

SVC Bone Window

CT

Mean (mm)

SD

(mm)

Max (mm)

Min (mm)

n

1B

-0,32

0,41

3,05

-3,83

30790

2B

-0,44

0,64

2,99

-3,95

30790

3B

-0,27

0,53

3,60

-2,40

30790

4B

-0,44

0,71

3,72

-3,20

30790

5B

-0,27

0,54

3,36

-3,16

30790

6B

-0,44

0,69

3,63

-3,19

30790

7B

-0,26

0,53

3,34

-2,76

30790

Soft Tissue Window

1ST

-0,44

0,64

2,99

-3,95

30790

2ST

-0,44

0,71

3,72

-3,20

30790

3ST

-0,44

0,69

3,63

-3,19

30790

4ST

-0,44

0,69

3,63

-2,79

30790

5ST

-0,45

0,70

3,73

-3,36

30790

6ST

-0,45

0,72

3,66

-3,23

30790

7ST

-0,38

0,79

3,31

-2,51

30790

Abbreviations: SD: Standard Deviation; n: Amount of Triangles

Figure 5 The graphs in figure 5 show the distribution of the deviation for the semi automatically generated meshes (SVC). The mesh generated from the images in the bone window with the highest radiation dosage (SVC 1B) have the narrowest graph. Although the mean deviation is closer to zero in other graphs the width of the graph gives a better approximation of the accuracy of the graph.

Figure 5: The graphs in figure 5 show the distribution of the deviation for the semi automatically generated meshes (SVC). The mesh generated from the images in the bone window with the highest radiation dosage (SVC 1B) have the narrowest graph. Although the mean deviation is closer to zero in other graphs the width of the graph gives a better approximation of the accuracy of the graph.

DISCUSSION

In this pilot study we investigated the influence of reducing the CT tube current and concomitant radiation dose on the quality of segmented meshes of the scapula. Our research suggests that tube current and therefore radiation dose could be largely reduced without reducing the accuracy meshes of the bone.

Our results confirm the results of previous studies which have proven that long bones can be accurately segmented using CT and MRI images. Although we included only one cadaver in our analysis, our results lie in the line of previous studies. They also confirm that CT segmented images overestimate bone geometry, but still provide sufficient geometrical information [5,6].

These studies reported on the segmentation accuracy of long bones such as the tibia and femur. This study however, is the first to our knowledge which reports on the segmentation accuracy of the scapula which is a bone with unique characteristics. Its body is very thin walled, the general shape is more complex and could therefore be more susceptible to segmentation errors.

The surface roughness of the segmented meshes is a parameter which is not commonly used to describe 3D models. The authors have the impression that the surface roughness of the meshes increased with the use of the semi-automated CT-Bone module (Mimics Research 19.0, Materialize NV, Leuven). Furthermore, to our knowledge, the surface roughness is a parameter which is difficult to be determined, using a generic method, to describe the general roughness of a virtual 3D surface (STL-file).

Furthermore, the used CT scanner and its concomitant software can largely influence the quality of the axial images and therefore the quality of the segmentation.

Future studies could focus on the difference between commercially and freely available software packages. The software package we used (Mimics Research 19.0, Materialize NV, Leuven, Belgium) was available in our institution but is not freely available to all researchers. The authors believe that freely available software packages might provide an accuracy which is good enough to allow surgeons to experiment with the 3D models of their patients before they perform surgery on the patient. Future research should focus on these differences as well.

Most importantly, future research should focus on reducing the radiation exposure while still providing accurate 3D reconstruction images. This would allow orthopedic and trauma surgeons to use CT imaging more frequently aiding in the design of personalized implants and guides without exposing the patient to unnecessary ionizing radiation.

CONCLUSION

This pilot study confirms the results that 3D reconstructed CT images provide accurate information of the bone surface. It suggests that this is not only accurate for long bones but also for bones with a more complex shape such as the scapula. The most important conclusion of this pilot study is that a linear reduction of ionizing radiation does not result in a linear decrease of mesh surface quality.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors wish to thank the Vesalius Instituut of the KU Leuven for their continuous work with the human body donation program. We also would like to thank Walter Coudyzer and Joke Binst of the UZ Leuven radiology department for technical support in data collection.

Herteleer M, Vancleef S, Sloten JV, Nijs S (2017) CT Images of the Scapula Taken with Reduced dose can Yield Segmented Models of Sufficient Accuracy - a Pilot Study. JSM Anat Physiol 2(2): 1011.

Received : 14 Feb 2017
Accepted : 15 Mar 2017
Published : 17 Mar 2017
Journals
Annals of Otolaryngology and Rhinology
ISSN : 2379-948X
Launched : 2014
JSM Schizophrenia
Launched : 2016
Journal of Nausea
Launched : 2020
JSM Internal Medicine
Launched : 2016
JSM Hepatitis
Launched : 2016
JSM Oro Facial Surgeries
ISSN : 2578-3211
Launched : 2016
Journal of Human Nutrition and Food Science
ISSN : 2333-6706
Launched : 2013
JSM Regenerative Medicine and Bioengineering
ISSN : 2379-0490
Launched : 2013
JSM Spine
ISSN : 2578-3181
Launched : 2016
Archives of Palliative Care
ISSN : 2573-1165
Launched : 2016
JSM Nutritional Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3203
Launched : 2017
Annals of Neurodegenerative Disorders
ISSN : 2476-2032
Launched : 2016
Journal of Fever
ISSN : 2641-7782
Launched : 2017
JSM Bone Marrow Research
ISSN : 2578-3351
Launched : 2016
JSM Mathematics and Statistics
ISSN : 2578-3173
Launched : 2014
Journal of Autoimmunity and Research
ISSN : 2573-1173
Launched : 2014
JSM Arthritis
ISSN : 2475-9155
Launched : 2016
JSM Head and Neck Cancer-Cases and Reviews
ISSN : 2573-1610
Launched : 2016
JSM General Surgery Cases and Images
ISSN : 2573-1564
Launched : 2016
JSM Dental Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1548
Launched : 2016
Annals of Emergency Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1017
Launched : 2016
Annals of Mens Health and Wellness
ISSN : 2641-7707
Launched : 2017
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Health Care
ISSN : 2576-0084
Launched : 2018
Journal of Chronic Diseases and Management
ISSN : 2573-1300
Launched : 2016
Annals of Vaccines and Immunization
ISSN : 2378-9379
Launched : 2014
JSM Heart Surgery Cases and Images
ISSN : 2578-3157
Launched : 2016
Annals of Reproductive Medicine and Treatment
ISSN : 2573-1092
Launched : 2016
JSM Brain Science
ISSN : 2573-1289
Launched : 2016
JSM Biomarkers
ISSN : 2578-3815
Launched : 2014
JSM Biology
ISSN : 2475-9392
Launched : 2016
Archives of Stem Cell and Research
ISSN : 2578-3580
Launched : 2014
Annals of Clinical and Medical Microbiology
ISSN : 2578-3629
Launched : 2014
JSM Pediatric Surgery
ISSN : 2578-3149
Launched : 2017
Journal of Memory Disorder and Rehabilitation
ISSN : 2578-319X
Launched : 2016
JSM Tropical Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2578-3165
Launched : 2016
JSM Head and Face Medicine
ISSN : 2578-3793
Launched : 2016
JSM Cardiothoracic Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1297
Launched : 2016
JSM Bone and Joint Diseases
ISSN : 2578-3351
Launched : 2017
JSM Bioavailability and Bioequivalence
ISSN : 2641-7812
Launched : 2017
JSM Atherosclerosis
ISSN : 2573-1270
Launched : 2016
Journal of Genitourinary Disorders
ISSN : 2641-7790
Launched : 2017
Journal of Fractures and Sprains
ISSN : 2578-3831
Launched : 2016
Journal of Autism and Epilepsy
ISSN : 2641-7774
Launched : 2016
Annals of Marine Biology and Research
ISSN : 2573-105X
Launched : 2014
JSM Health Education & Primary Health Care
ISSN : 2578-3777
Launched : 2016
JSM Communication Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3807
Launched : 2016
Annals of Musculoskeletal Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3599
Launched : 2016
Annals of Virology and Research
ISSN : 2573-1122
Launched : 2014
JSM Renal Medicine
ISSN : 2573-1637
Launched : 2016
Journal of Muscle Health
ISSN : 2578-3823
Launched : 2016
JSM Genetics and Genomics
ISSN : 2334-1823
Launched : 2013
JSM Anxiety and Depression
ISSN : 2475-9139
Launched : 2016
Clinical Journal of Heart Diseases
ISSN : 2641-7766
Launched : 2016
Annals of Medicinal Chemistry and Research
ISSN : 2378-9336
Launched : 2014
JSM Pain and Management
ISSN : 2578-3378
Launched : 2016
JSM Women's Health
ISSN : 2578-3696
Launched : 2016
Clinical Research in HIV or AIDS
ISSN : 2374-0094
Launched : 2013
Journal of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Obesity
ISSN : 2333-6692
Launched : 2013
Journal of Substance Abuse and Alcoholism
ISSN : 2373-9363
Launched : 2013
JSM Neurosurgery and Spine
ISSN : 2373-9479
Launched : 2013
Journal of Liver and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2379-0830
Launched : 2014
Journal of Drug Design and Research
ISSN : 2379-089X
Launched : 2014
JSM Clinical Oncology and Research
ISSN : 2373-938X
Launched : 2013
JSM Bioinformatics, Genomics and Proteomics
ISSN : 2576-1102
Launched : 2014
JSM Chemistry
ISSN : 2334-1831
Launched : 2013
Journal of Trauma and Care
ISSN : 2573-1246
Launched : 2014
JSM Surgical Oncology and Research
ISSN : 2578-3688
Launched : 2016
Annals of Food Processing and Preservation
ISSN : 2573-1033
Launched : 2016
Journal of Radiology and Radiation Therapy
ISSN : 2333-7095
Launched : 2013
JSM Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
ISSN : 2578-3572
Launched : 2016
Annals of Clinical Pathology
ISSN : 2373-9282
Launched : 2013
Annals of Cardiovascular Diseases
ISSN : 2641-7731
Launched : 2016
Journal of Behavior
ISSN : 2576-0076
Launched : 2016
Annals of Clinical and Experimental Metabolism
ISSN : 2572-2492
Launched : 2016
Clinical Research in Infectious Diseases
ISSN : 2379-0636
Launched : 2013
JSM Microbiology
ISSN : 2333-6455
Launched : 2013
Journal of Urology and Research
ISSN : 2379-951X
Launched : 2014
Journal of Family Medicine and Community Health
ISSN : 2379-0547
Launched : 2013
Annals of Pregnancy and Care
ISSN : 2578-336X
Launched : 2017
JSM Cell and Developmental Biology
ISSN : 2379-061X
Launched : 2013
Annals of Aquaculture and Research
ISSN : 2379-0881
Launched : 2014
Clinical Research in Pulmonology
ISSN : 2333-6625
Launched : 2013
Journal of Immunology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2333-6714
Launched : 2013
Annals of Forensic Research and Analysis
ISSN : 2378-9476
Launched : 2014
JSM Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
ISSN : 2333-7109
Launched : 2013
Annals of Breast Cancer Research
ISSN : 2641-7685
Launched : 2016
Annals of Gerontology and Geriatric Research
ISSN : 2378-9409
Launched : 2014
Journal of Sleep Medicine and Disorders
ISSN : 2379-0822
Launched : 2014
JSM Burns and Trauma
ISSN : 2475-9406
Launched : 2016
Chemical Engineering and Process Techniques
ISSN : 2333-6633
Launched : 2013
Annals of Clinical Cytology and Pathology
ISSN : 2475-9430
Launched : 2014
JSM Allergy and Asthma
ISSN : 2573-1254
Launched : 2016
Journal of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
ISSN : 2334-2307
Launched : 2013
Annals of Sports Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2379-0571
Launched : 2014
JSM Sexual Medicine
ISSN : 2578-3718
Launched : 2016
Annals of Vascular Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2378-9344
Launched : 2014
JSM Biotechnology and Biomedical Engineering
ISSN : 2333-7117
Launched : 2013
Journal of Hematology and Transfusion
ISSN : 2333-6684
Launched : 2013
JSM Environmental Science and Ecology
ISSN : 2333-7141
Launched : 2013
Journal of Cardiology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2333-6676
Launched : 2013
JSM Nanotechnology and Nanomedicine
ISSN : 2334-1815
Launched : 2013
Journal of Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders
ISSN : 2475-9473
Launched : 2016
JSM Ophthalmology
ISSN : 2333-6447
Launched : 2013
Journal of Pharmacology and Clinical Toxicology
ISSN : 2333-7079
Launched : 2013
Annals of Psychiatry and Mental Health
ISSN : 2374-0124
Launched : 2013
Medical Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
ISSN : 2333-6439
Launched : 2013
Annals of Pediatrics and Child Health
ISSN : 2373-9312
Launched : 2013
JSM Clinical Pharmaceutics
ISSN : 2379-9498
Launched : 2014
JSM Foot and Ankle
ISSN : 2475-9112
Launched : 2016
JSM Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementia
ISSN : 2378-9565
Launched : 2014
Journal of Addiction Medicine and Therapy
ISSN : 2333-665X
Launched : 2013
Journal of Veterinary Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2378-931X
Launched : 2013
Annals of Public Health and Research
ISSN : 2378-9328
Launched : 2014
Annals of Orthopedics and Rheumatology
ISSN : 2373-9290
Launched : 2013
Journal of Clinical Nephrology and Research
ISSN : 2379-0652
Launched : 2014
Annals of Community Medicine and Practice
ISSN : 2475-9465
Launched : 2014
Annals of Biometrics and Biostatistics
ISSN : 2374-0116
Launched : 2013
JSM Clinical Case Reports
ISSN : 2373-9819
Launched : 2013
Journal of Cancer Biology and Research
ISSN : 2373-9436
Launched : 2013
Journal of Surgery and Transplantation Science
ISSN : 2379-0911
Launched : 2013
Journal of Dermatology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2373-9371
Launched : 2013
JSM Gastroenterology and Hepatology
ISSN : 2373-9487
Launched : 2013
Annals of Nursing and Practice
ISSN : 2379-9501
Launched : 2014
JSM Dentistry
ISSN : 2333-7133
Launched : 2013
Author Information X