Loading

JSM Biology

Multiple -Regression: A Comprehensive Approach for Analysis of Weight-Length Relationships in Macrobrachim rosenbergii

Research Article | Open Access

  • 1. Division of Genetics and Molecular Biology, University of Malaya, Malaysia
  • 2. Centre for Research in Biotechnology for Agriculture (CEBAR), University of Malaya, Malaysia
+ Show More - Show Less
Corresponding Authors
Subha Bhassu, Division of Genetics and Molecular Biology, Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Abstract

The Malaysian giant prawn, Macrobrachium rosenbergii [3], is an important crustacean aquaculture candidate cultured all year round in hot climate regions and seasonally in some temperate areas. According to the authors ’knowledge, there is no reported multiple -approach attempt so far, at least for shrimps, for estimating weight using morphometric measurements. The authors hypothesized that the few morphometric traits, with proved simple significant relationships, are expected to affect body weight simultaneously. Hence, in this study they decided to use a multiple approach using these morphometric measurements as predictors for body weight. The approach was found to be more effective and accurate compared to simple relations, as it explained 73- 94% of the total variance and showed significant differences between populations of the species collected from different geographical locations. Accordingly, the authors confidently recommend this method to be used for such estimations in other crustaceans and other metazoan as well.

Citation

Elsheikh MO, Bhassu S (2016) Multiple -Regression: A Comprehensive Approach for Analysis of Weight-Length Relationships in Macrobrachim Rosenbergii. JSM Biol 1(1): 1002.

Keywords

Freshwater aquaculture, Morphometric traits, Giant Malaysian Prawn

INTRODUCTION

The giant Malaysian prawn (GMP), Macrobrachium rosenbergii [3], is an important aquaculture candidate farmed universally in the tropics and subtropics. It is naturally found in South and Southeast Asia covering East Pakistan, east coast of India, Bay of Bengal, Gulf of Thailand, Malaysia and the northern Indonesian islands of Sumatra, Java and Kalimantan [11].

As the GMP is an aquatic animal, longer time out of water is stressful to it. But companies involved in its production need a mean of estimating fresh body weight (WT) which is crucial for taking decisions on harvest time. Measuring length under field conditions is easier than weighing animals. Length could be measured under previously prepared clear and oxygenized water, while this is not true for weight. So, a regression model of estimating WT using quickly measured lengths such as total length (TL), tail length (TA) and carapace length (CL) is quite supportive. Actually, regression as a statistical model has been applied to estimate body weight using morphometric body measurements for their high associations with WT. Besides, their lesser variability and more easiness in field [7,9], being useful in describing growth in wild populations [1,2], defining the stocks and comparative growth studies [8,9], as well as having high association with fecundity [3] and meat yield [6].

All the predictors seem to affect the response variables (WT) collectively, hence multiple regression approach could be more convenient and accurate compared to obtaining simple relations between variance of variables such as WT and one of the other variables at a time [15]. Although appreciable literature on weight - length relationships is available, yet no reports applying a multiple approach as all reporters whom we come across their studies performed simple regression relationship between two traits at time. So, we conducted this study applying stepwise multiple regression approach to be used for prediction for genetic gain in future studies which is essential for conduction breeding studies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two groups of samples were collected for this study. The first group comprised of four parental ecotype populations of GMP collected directly from wild sources in four rivers, viz Kota Kuala Muda (5.5833° N, 100.3833° E), Muar (2.0500° N, 102.567° E), Perak (4.183? N and 101. 267? E) and Timon (4.932 N, 115.396 E) in the states of Kedah, Johor, Perak and Negeri Sembilan respectively. While the second group, comprised of 8 sets of progenies produced in the second round of cyclical mating of the first group (i.e. parental ecotype populations) raised in grow- out ponds at Tapah village (4.183? N and 101. 267? E) in Perak stateMalaysia.

Data of morphometric measurements, namely total length (TL), tail length (TA), carapace length (CL) and fresh body weight (WT), were collected for the two mentioned groups of the giant Malaysian prawns. WT was measured by a digital balance (Sartorius, accuracy of 0.01g) to the nearest gram. (TL) was measured as the length from the tip of the rostrum to the tip of the telson, carapace length (CL) from the eye to the first abdominal segment and tail length (TA) from the first abdominal segment to the tip of the telson. All length measurements were taken to the nearest millimeter using a 30 cm ruler.

In addition to morphometric body measurement, sex data were also recorded only for parental groups.

Statistical analysis

SAS software (SAS Institute Inc. 2015) procedure of correlation was used to estimate correlation coefficients between each predictor and WT (the response variable) as well as among these predictors. Prior to using the regression procedure of SAS software, data were logarithmically transformed for the nature of the relationships of these morphometric measurements with WT are in a curvilinear manner [7], while the procedure of regression in SAS assumes linearity. The software version used was SAS 9.4. In this regression analysis, length measurements were used as

predictors for estimating WT as a response variable. Data were analyzed for parental groups in both combined and separated sex’s runs but each progeny group was tackled as a single set without sexing.

The general formula applied for these regressions is:

WT = μ + β0 TL+ β1 CL+ β2 TA+ eijk

Where μ is a constant, eijk is a random error which is independent and normally distributed, β0 is the expected difference between two experimental units for which the variable TL differs by one unit, with all other explanatory variables kept the same, β1 and β2 are Similar to β0 with changing the explanatory variable to CL and TA respectively.

RESULTS

Correlation coefficients between WT, TL, CL and TA were found to be 0.902, 0.900 and 0.846 respectively, while between predictor variables the coefficients were 0.889, 0.950 and 0.849 for TL with CL, TL with AT and CL with AT consecutively.

Tables (1-3) show the components of stepwise regression equations for mixed sexes of parental ecotype populations, separated sexes of parental ecotypes and mixed sexes of progeny groups respectively.

Figure 1 Fit diagnostic of residuals against predicted values of WT for Kedah ecotype (mixed).

Figure 1 Fit diagnostic of residuals against predicted values of WT for Kedah ecotype (mixed).

In this analysis, the model was tuned to the extent that the value of alpha used is one third of that of the default value (0.15) used in the regression procedure of SAS program. However, this tuning exactly equals the conventional alpha value (P≤ .05) used in most statistical tests used in various fields. In spite of the tuning just mentioned, results obtained were unlikely to occur by chance for the maximum of such a probability (Pr > [t]) for each considered trait, were as low as ≤ .0007, .0243 and .0005 in mixed parental ecotype populations, separated ecotype parental populations and mixed progeny groups respectively. Besides, the model was found to explain a minimum of 73% of the total variance. In more details, the first predictor alone explained a minimum of 68% of that total variance, as explained in the tables by standard estimate (standard partial regression coefficient), reaching up to 0.86. In addition, eliminating unimportant variables resulted in losing only 0.02 of the variance explained. This does not means that an eliminated predictor variable does not contribute totally to the response variable, but it means there is no additional variance for it to explain after including its predecessor predictor variables. This conclusion is due to intercorrelations between predictor variables stated above. Further, Figures (1-3) consecutively show plots of fit diagnostics for log WT as an example for each of the variables for the three groups.

Figure 2 Fit diagnostic of residuals against predicted values of WT for Negeri Sembilan Females

Figure 2 Fit diagnostic of residuals against predicted values of WT for Negeri Sembilan Females

These plots indicate fairly random distributions of residuals, with a few observations falling out of the threshold limits, for example of the Cook’s D statistic meaning that these readings are outliers.

Figure 3 Fit diagnostic of residuals against predicted values of WT for Negeri Sembilan Males.

Figure 3 Fit diagnostic of residuals against predicted values of WT for Negeri Sembilan Males.

Particularly, total length (TL) was found to be the first predictor in all progeny groups except a single one (87.5%), none of parental groups when each ecotype was treated as a single group (without sexing) and all the males plus 50% of the females when they were sexed. But carapace length (CL) was detected as a first predictor in 75% of unsexed parental groups and 50 % of the females when sexed.

Figure 4 Fit diagnostic of residuals against predicted values of WT for Progeny - NJ×PP

Figure 4 Fit diagnostic of residuals against predicted values of WT for Progeny - NJ×PP

 

Different equations were obtained for different parental ecotypes (different watersheds) as well as for different progeny groups.

Table 1: Components of the equations drawn by stepwise multiple -regression for estimating WT in response to TL, TA and CL for mixed sexes of parental Malaysian prawn ecotypes.

Constants Value Partial R² Model R² SE Standardized Estimate Pr > F
                                                            Kedah
Intercept -4.02089      0.21199      0 < .0001
β0 TL 1.72757 0.0405 0.9353 0.22519 0.47573 < .0001
Β1 CL 1.46630 0.8949 0.8949 0.17660 0.51488 < .0001 
                                                              Perak
Intercept -2.81113     0.26397    0 < .0001
β0 TL 0.31591 0.0544 0.8887 0.06751 0.26615 < .0001
Β2 TA 0.71990 0.0142 0.9029 0.20159 0.20157 .0006
Β1 CL 1.50409 0.8343 0.8343 0.15038 0.56090 < .0001
                                                         Negeri Sembilan
Intercept -3.82881     0.16455    0 < .0001
β0 TL 0.35691 0.1080 0.9112 0.03917 0.31123 < .0001
Β2 TA 2.06019 0.8032 0.8032 0.12515 0.55019 < .0001
Β1 CL 0.50317 0.0117 0.9229 0.10109  0.20752 < .0001
                                                              Johor
Intercept -3.44132     0.36477    0 < .0001
Β2 TA 1.14120 0.0498 0.7295 0.32005 0.36603  
Β1 CL 1.75245 0.6797 0.6797 0.33667 0.53435 < .0001
R2 = coefficients of determination, Pr= Probability

Table 2: Components of the equations drawn by stepwise multiple -regression for estimating WT in response to TL, TA and CL for separate sexes of parental Malaysian prawn ecotypes

Constants Value Partial R² Model R² SE Standardized Estimate Pr > F  
                                                     Kedah Male
Intercept -4.80893     0.32975   0 < .0001
β0 TL 1.04820 0.8950 0.8950 0.45348 0.29676 .0243
Β2 TA 1.28653 0.0254 0.9204 0.42369 0.34957 .0035
Β1 CL 1.03656 0.0106 0.9310 0.24556 0.34710 < .0001
                                                  Kedah Female
Intercept -4.02218     0.30622   0 < .0001
β0 TL 0.82440 0.0335 0.8691 0.30254 0.33702 .0095
Β1 CL 1.56875 0.8356 0.8356 0.29771 0.63107 <.0001 
                                                   Perak Male
Intercept -3.11764     0.42696   0 < .0001
β0 TL 0.96648 0.7656 0.7656 0.39727 0.38002 .0204
Β2 TA 1.40918 0.0348 0.8004 0.40476 0.54383 < .0001
                                                   Perak Female
Intercept -2.67566     0.34605   0 < .0001
β0 TL 0.82674 0.0493 0.8173 0.22279 0.26427 .0005
Β1 CL 1.66893 0.7679 0.7679 0.16212 0.73313 < .0001
                                                  Negeri Sembilan Male
Intercept -4.06354     0.43282    0 < .0001
β0 TL 1.39323 0.8350 0.8350 0.40194 0.43347 .0012
Β2 TA 0.88155 0.0327 0.8677 0.36830 0.28154 .0210
Β1 CL 0.62696 0.0152 0.8829 0.24790 0.26903 .0151
                                              Negeri Sembilan Female
Intercept -3.95486     0.18822    0 < .0001
β0 TL 2.53042 0.8644 0.8644 0.13915 0.80581 < .0001
Β1 CL 0.44737 0.0168 0.8812 0.11062 0.17919 < .0001
                                                      Johor Male
Intercept -6.11865     0.28776   0  
β0 TL 4.28833 0.9209 0.9209 0.29079 1.27451 < .0001
Β1 CL -1.11848 0.0193 0.9403 0.28086 -0.34418 0.0002
                                                     Johor Female
Intercept -3.50722     0.67490   0 < .0001
β0 TL 2.63774 0.7458 0.7458 0.36293 0.86362 < .0001
 R2 = coefficients of determination, Pr= Probability

Table 3: The components of stepwise multiple- regression equations of WT estimation for unsexed progeny groups.

Constants Value Partial R² Model R² SE Standardized Estimate Pr > F  
                                                       PP×KJ
Intercept -5.04386     0.37201   < .0001
β0 TL 2.05612 0.8295 0.8295 0.30709 0.62671 < .0001
Β2 TA 1.12735 0.0429 0.8723 0.30020  0.35149 .0005
                                                       KP×NJ
Intercept -4.39223     0.40006   < .0001
β0 TL 2.18260 0.7903 0.7903 0.25600 0.67700 < .0001
Β1 CL 0.73534 0.0559 0.8462 0.18388 0.31755 0.0002
                                                       KK×PJ
Intercept -5.90934     0.60435   < .0001 
β0 TL 3.44949 0.8177 0.8177 0.29250 0.90429 < .0001
                                                       NJ×PP
Intercept -4.27239     0.43769   < .0001
β0 TL 2.28870 0.7889 0.7889 0.26185 0.74984 < .0001
Β1 CL 0.50120 0.0368 0.8257 0.18178 0.23653 0.0091
                                                       PP×KN
Intercept -4.30191     0.38637   < .0001
β0 TL 2.29108 0.8843 0.8843 0.31178 0.75255 < .0001
Β1 CL 0.51889 0.0127 0.8971 0.24249 0.21914 0.0390
                                                        PJ×KK
Intercept -5.14127     0.46667   < .0001
β0 TL 2.70878 0.8918 0.8918 0.33733 0.76640 < .0001
Β1 CL 0.50594 0.0144 0.9062 0.22505 0.21456 0.0314
                                                       KN×JJ
Intercept -5.33628     0.26267   < .0001
β0 TL 2.52682 0.9225 0.9225 0.24601 0.78224 < .0001
Β2 TA 0.73820 0.0114 0.9339 0.27047 0.20787 0.0092
                                                     JJ×KP
Intercept -4.42795     0.38059   < .0001
β0 TL 1.16095 0.0348 0.8635 0.39452 0.41375 0.0058
Β2 TA 1.81996 0.8287 0.8287 0.47300 0.54099 0.0005
J= Johor, N= Negeri Sembilan, K= Kedah and P= Perak, R2 = coefficients of determination, Pr= Probability

 

DISCUSSION

Naturally, growth in the giant Malaysian prawn (GMP) is in a leap-frog manner with almost complete cessation before the upcoming moult and its pace decreases with age, expressed as a drop in the slope of the curve [5,14]. Growth is reflected in proportional increments of weight and length measurements. Hence, in this study, results of weight-length relationships in Macrobrachium rosenbergii applying stepwise multiple- linear regression were presented and discussed.

According to our knowledge, this is the first report applying a multiple approach on weight-length relationship data of shrimps. As available literature includes results for only simple relationships, we could inevitably compare only our first predictors in the equations we obtained with such results.

Excitingly, results of the regression equations for mixed sexes groups showed high coefficients of determination (R2 ). This is in an apparent contrast to the known skewed growth of the species, but could be explained by the fact that only blue claw males of the three different known morphotypes were collected, because the aim was to use them in a breeding program. Actually, the small male morphotype seemed to be the one causing most of the skewness in grow outs of the Malaysian prawn, so excluding them made the skewness to disappear. Furthermore, small males are equally fertile, but being socially submissive, they are unlikely to get a chance to mate with berried females in the presence of their dominant counter parts hence excluding them is better. Growth in females is quite homogeneous, so, adding them to BC males would not distort the data and in the contrary, it increased the sample size and resulted in higher coefficients of determination (R2 ) in comparison to equations obtained for separate sexes table (2) meaning it increased the explained variance.

Particularly, total length (TL) was found to be the first predictor in all progeny groups except a single one (87.5%), none of parental groups when each ecotype was treated as a single group (without sexing) and all the males plus 50% of the females when they were sexed. But carapace length (CL) was detected as a first predictor in 75% of unsexed parental groups and 50 % of the females when sexed. So, equations showing total length as a first predictor are in line with [2,6,12] reports, while equations showing carapace as a first estimator coincide with results reported by Kuun et al [3].

TL as representing the whole body length of the animal is expected to be the first predictor of weight. But may be due to rostrum breakage its ratio may be affected [7]. In the parental samples much fighting would have occurred to a form a new social hierarchy for they were collected from different hierarchically formed groups. This aggression would have resulted in breakage of their rostrums causing reduction in their total body lengths; while this is not expected to happen in the progeny groups, which were living in one pond for a long time has a well-developed hierarchy (Table 3).

In addition, obtaining different equations for parental ecotypes (different watersheds) and progeny groups reveals the effects of life stage, as well as genetics through difference in prawn sources on these relationships. This is in line with results reported by Primavera et al., [9] and Lalrinsanga et al., [7].

In conclusion as the multiple- regression can include all effective predictive variables at a time, it best fit weight-length relation data analyses. Consequently we recommend utilization of this approach for studying such relationships for shrimps in general and other aquatic species as well.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

S We would like to thank MOSTI ABI funding: ABI 53-02-03- 1030 (2008-2011) for the breeding work for GRA internship awarded for Mr. Mohamed Omer Elsheikh and HIR- MOHE funding project H-23001-G000006 by University Malaya that was awarded to Assoc. Prof. Dr. Subha Bhassu for allowing us to conduct this research and also to National Prawn Fry Production and Research Centre, FRI, Kedah, Malaysia for providing the infrastructure for brood stock management program which was financed by MOSTI ABI funding.

REFERENCES

1. Abohweyere PO, Williams AB. Length-weight relationship and condition factor of Macrobrachium macrobrachion in the Lagos-Lekki Lagoon system. NJBS. 2008; 3: 1333-1336.

2. Deekae SN, Abowei JFN. Macrobrachium macrobrachion (Herklots, 1851) length-weight relationship and fulton’s condition factor in Luubara creek, Ogoni land, Niger delta, Nigeria. International Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances. 2010; 2: 155-162.

3. Habashy MM. On the breeding behaviour and reproduction of the freshwater prawn, Macrobrachium rosenbergii (de Man 1879) (Decapoda, Crustacea) under laboratory conditions. Aquac Res. 2013; 44: 395-403.

4. Jensen AT, Sørensen H. Lecture notes for applied statistics Department of Natural Sciences, Life Science Faculty, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denamark. 2007.

5. Kurup BM, Harikrishnan M, Sureshkumar S. Length-weight relationship of male morphotypes of Macrobrachium rosenbergii (de Man) as a valid index for differentiating their developmental pathway and growth phases. Indian J Fish. 2000; 47: 283-290.

6. Lalrinsanga PL, Pillai BR, Patra G, Mohanty S, Naik NK, Das RR, et al. Yield characteristics and morphometric relationships of giant freshwater prawn, Macrobrachium rosenbergii (de Man, 1879). Aquacult Int. 2014; 22: 1053-1066.

7. Lalrinsanga PL, Pillai BR, Patra G, Mohanty S, Naik NK, Sahu S. Length– weight relationship and condition factor of giant freshwater prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii (De Man, 1879) based on developmental stages, culture stages and sex. Turk J Fish Aquat Sc. 2012; 12.

8. Peixoto S, Soares R, Wasielesky W, Cavalli RO, Jensen L. Morphometric relationship of weight and length of cultured Farfantepenaeus paulensis during nursery, grow out, and broodstock production phases. Aquaculture. 2004; 241: 291-299.

9. Primavera JH, Parado-Estepa FD, Lebata JL. Morphometric relationship of length and weight of giant tiger prawn Penaeus monodon according to life stage, sex and source. Aquaculture. 1998; 164: 67-75.

10. SAS Institute Inc. 2015. SAS/STAT® 14.1 User’s Guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.

11. Wowor D, Ng PKL. The giant freshwater prawns of the Macrobrachium rosenbergii species group (Crustacea, Decapoda, Caridea, Palaemonidae). Raffles Bull Zool. 2007; 55: 321-336.

12. Kunda M, Dewan S, Uddin MJ, Karim M, Kabir S, Uddin MS. Short Communication: Length-Weight Relationship, Condition Factor and Relative Condition Factor of Macrobrachium rosenbergii in Rice Fields. Asian Fisheries Science. 2008; 21: 451-456.

13. Kuun P, Pakhomov EA, Mc Quaid CD. Morphometric relationship of caridean shrimp, Nauticaris marionis Bate, 1988 at the Prince Edward Islands (Southern Ocean). Polar Biol. 1991; 22: 216-218.

14. Montagna MC. Effect of temperature on the survival and growth of freshwater prawns Macrobrachium borellii and Palaemonetes argentinus (Crustacea, Palaemonidae). Iheringia. Série Zoologia. 2011; 101: 233-238.

15. Elsheikh MO, Othman MFB, Faruq G, Eid II, Bhassu S. Evaluation of growth performance in cyclically mated populations of Malaysian giant prawn, Macrobrachium rosenbergii, in Malaysia. Sains Malaysiana. 2015; 44: 1111-1118.

Received : 11 May 2016
Accepted : 31 May 2016
Published : 02 Jun 2016
Journals
Annals of Otolaryngology and Rhinology
ISSN : 2379-948X
Launched : 2014
JSM Schizophrenia
Launched : 2016
Journal of Nausea
Launched : 2020
JSM Internal Medicine
Launched : 2016
JSM Hepatitis
Launched : 2016
JSM Oro Facial Surgeries
ISSN : 2578-3211
Launched : 2016
Journal of Human Nutrition and Food Science
ISSN : 2333-6706
Launched : 2013
JSM Regenerative Medicine and Bioengineering
ISSN : 2379-0490
Launched : 2013
JSM Spine
ISSN : 2578-3181
Launched : 2016
Archives of Palliative Care
ISSN : 2573-1165
Launched : 2016
JSM Nutritional Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3203
Launched : 2017
Annals of Neurodegenerative Disorders
ISSN : 2476-2032
Launched : 2016
Journal of Fever
ISSN : 2641-7782
Launched : 2017
JSM Bone Marrow Research
ISSN : 2578-3351
Launched : 2016
JSM Mathematics and Statistics
ISSN : 2578-3173
Launched : 2014
Journal of Autoimmunity and Research
ISSN : 2573-1173
Launched : 2014
JSM Arthritis
ISSN : 2475-9155
Launched : 2016
JSM Head and Neck Cancer-Cases and Reviews
ISSN : 2573-1610
Launched : 2016
JSM General Surgery Cases and Images
ISSN : 2573-1564
Launched : 2016
JSM Anatomy and Physiology
ISSN : 2573-1262
Launched : 2016
JSM Dental Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1548
Launched : 2016
Annals of Emergency Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1017
Launched : 2016
Annals of Mens Health and Wellness
ISSN : 2641-7707
Launched : 2017
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Health Care
ISSN : 2576-0084
Launched : 2018
Journal of Chronic Diseases and Management
ISSN : 2573-1300
Launched : 2016
Annals of Vaccines and Immunization
ISSN : 2378-9379
Launched : 2014
JSM Heart Surgery Cases and Images
ISSN : 2578-3157
Launched : 2016
Annals of Reproductive Medicine and Treatment
ISSN : 2573-1092
Launched : 2016
JSM Brain Science
ISSN : 2573-1289
Launched : 2016
JSM Biomarkers
ISSN : 2578-3815
Launched : 2014
Archives of Stem Cell and Research
ISSN : 2578-3580
Launched : 2014
Annals of Clinical and Medical Microbiology
ISSN : 2578-3629
Launched : 2014
JSM Pediatric Surgery
ISSN : 2578-3149
Launched : 2017
Journal of Memory Disorder and Rehabilitation
ISSN : 2578-319X
Launched : 2016
JSM Tropical Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2578-3165
Launched : 2016
JSM Head and Face Medicine
ISSN : 2578-3793
Launched : 2016
JSM Cardiothoracic Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1297
Launched : 2016
JSM Bone and Joint Diseases
ISSN : 2578-3351
Launched : 2017
JSM Bioavailability and Bioequivalence
ISSN : 2641-7812
Launched : 2017
JSM Atherosclerosis
ISSN : 2573-1270
Launched : 2016
Journal of Genitourinary Disorders
ISSN : 2641-7790
Launched : 2017
Journal of Fractures and Sprains
ISSN : 2578-3831
Launched : 2016
Journal of Autism and Epilepsy
ISSN : 2641-7774
Launched : 2016
Annals of Marine Biology and Research
ISSN : 2573-105X
Launched : 2014
JSM Health Education & Primary Health Care
ISSN : 2578-3777
Launched : 2016
JSM Communication Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3807
Launched : 2016
Annals of Musculoskeletal Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3599
Launched : 2016
Annals of Virology and Research
ISSN : 2573-1122
Launched : 2014
JSM Renal Medicine
ISSN : 2573-1637
Launched : 2016
Journal of Muscle Health
ISSN : 2578-3823
Launched : 2016
JSM Genetics and Genomics
ISSN : 2334-1823
Launched : 2013
JSM Anxiety and Depression
ISSN : 2475-9139
Launched : 2016
Clinical Journal of Heart Diseases
ISSN : 2641-7766
Launched : 2016
Annals of Medicinal Chemistry and Research
ISSN : 2378-9336
Launched : 2014
JSM Pain and Management
ISSN : 2578-3378
Launched : 2016
JSM Women's Health
ISSN : 2578-3696
Launched : 2016
Clinical Research in HIV or AIDS
ISSN : 2374-0094
Launched : 2013
Journal of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Obesity
ISSN : 2333-6692
Launched : 2013
Journal of Substance Abuse and Alcoholism
ISSN : 2373-9363
Launched : 2013
JSM Neurosurgery and Spine
ISSN : 2373-9479
Launched : 2013
Journal of Liver and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2379-0830
Launched : 2014
Journal of Drug Design and Research
ISSN : 2379-089X
Launched : 2014
JSM Clinical Oncology and Research
ISSN : 2373-938X
Launched : 2013
JSM Bioinformatics, Genomics and Proteomics
ISSN : 2576-1102
Launched : 2014
JSM Chemistry
ISSN : 2334-1831
Launched : 2013
Journal of Trauma and Care
ISSN : 2573-1246
Launched : 2014
JSM Surgical Oncology and Research
ISSN : 2578-3688
Launched : 2016
Annals of Food Processing and Preservation
ISSN : 2573-1033
Launched : 2016
Journal of Radiology and Radiation Therapy
ISSN : 2333-7095
Launched : 2013
JSM Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
ISSN : 2578-3572
Launched : 2016
Annals of Clinical Pathology
ISSN : 2373-9282
Launched : 2013
Annals of Cardiovascular Diseases
ISSN : 2641-7731
Launched : 2016
Journal of Behavior
ISSN : 2576-0076
Launched : 2016
Annals of Clinical and Experimental Metabolism
ISSN : 2572-2492
Launched : 2016
Clinical Research in Infectious Diseases
ISSN : 2379-0636
Launched : 2013
JSM Microbiology
ISSN : 2333-6455
Launched : 2013
Journal of Urology and Research
ISSN : 2379-951X
Launched : 2014
Journal of Family Medicine and Community Health
ISSN : 2379-0547
Launched : 2013
Annals of Pregnancy and Care
ISSN : 2578-336X
Launched : 2017
JSM Cell and Developmental Biology
ISSN : 2379-061X
Launched : 2013
Annals of Aquaculture and Research
ISSN : 2379-0881
Launched : 2014
Clinical Research in Pulmonology
ISSN : 2333-6625
Launched : 2013
Journal of Immunology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2333-6714
Launched : 2013
Annals of Forensic Research and Analysis
ISSN : 2378-9476
Launched : 2014
JSM Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
ISSN : 2333-7109
Launched : 2013
Annals of Breast Cancer Research
ISSN : 2641-7685
Launched : 2016
Annals of Gerontology and Geriatric Research
ISSN : 2378-9409
Launched : 2014
Journal of Sleep Medicine and Disorders
ISSN : 2379-0822
Launched : 2014
JSM Burns and Trauma
ISSN : 2475-9406
Launched : 2016
Chemical Engineering and Process Techniques
ISSN : 2333-6633
Launched : 2013
Annals of Clinical Cytology and Pathology
ISSN : 2475-9430
Launched : 2014
JSM Allergy and Asthma
ISSN : 2573-1254
Launched : 2016
Journal of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
ISSN : 2334-2307
Launched : 2013
Annals of Sports Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2379-0571
Launched : 2014
JSM Sexual Medicine
ISSN : 2578-3718
Launched : 2016
Annals of Vascular Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2378-9344
Launched : 2014
JSM Biotechnology and Biomedical Engineering
ISSN : 2333-7117
Launched : 2013
Journal of Hematology and Transfusion
ISSN : 2333-6684
Launched : 2013
JSM Environmental Science and Ecology
ISSN : 2333-7141
Launched : 2013
Journal of Cardiology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2333-6676
Launched : 2013
JSM Nanotechnology and Nanomedicine
ISSN : 2334-1815
Launched : 2013
Journal of Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders
ISSN : 2475-9473
Launched : 2016
JSM Ophthalmology
ISSN : 2333-6447
Launched : 2013
Journal of Pharmacology and Clinical Toxicology
ISSN : 2333-7079
Launched : 2013
Annals of Psychiatry and Mental Health
ISSN : 2374-0124
Launched : 2013
Medical Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
ISSN : 2333-6439
Launched : 2013
Annals of Pediatrics and Child Health
ISSN : 2373-9312
Launched : 2013
JSM Clinical Pharmaceutics
ISSN : 2379-9498
Launched : 2014
JSM Foot and Ankle
ISSN : 2475-9112
Launched : 2016
JSM Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementia
ISSN : 2378-9565
Launched : 2014
Journal of Addiction Medicine and Therapy
ISSN : 2333-665X
Launched : 2013
Journal of Veterinary Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2378-931X
Launched : 2013
Annals of Public Health and Research
ISSN : 2378-9328
Launched : 2014
Annals of Orthopedics and Rheumatology
ISSN : 2373-9290
Launched : 2013
Journal of Clinical Nephrology and Research
ISSN : 2379-0652
Launched : 2014
Annals of Community Medicine and Practice
ISSN : 2475-9465
Launched : 2014
Annals of Biometrics and Biostatistics
ISSN : 2374-0116
Launched : 2013
JSM Clinical Case Reports
ISSN : 2373-9819
Launched : 2013
Journal of Cancer Biology and Research
ISSN : 2373-9436
Launched : 2013
Journal of Surgery and Transplantation Science
ISSN : 2379-0911
Launched : 2013
Journal of Dermatology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2373-9371
Launched : 2013
JSM Gastroenterology and Hepatology
ISSN : 2373-9487
Launched : 2013
Annals of Nursing and Practice
ISSN : 2379-9501
Launched : 2014
JSM Dentistry
ISSN : 2333-7133
Launched : 2013
Author Information X