Loading

JSM Dentistry

Methods for Reversing the Bond Strength to Bleached Enamel: A Literature Review

Review Article | Open Access | Volume 6 | Issue 1

  • 1. Herminio Ometto Foundation, Brazil
  • 2. Department of General Dentistry, Stony Brook School of Dental Medicine, USA
+ Show More - Show Less
Corresponding Authors
Ana Carolina Botta, Department of General Dentistry, Stony Brook School of Dental Medicine, Stony Brook, NY, USA, Tel: 55-19-997835350;
Abstract

The residual oxygen can negatively interfere with the adhesive polymerization, and reduce  the bond strength to bleached enamel. The aim of this study was to review the literature on  methods for reversing the bond strength to bleached enamel, efficacy and clinical feasibility.  A waiting period, the use of dental adhesives containing organic solvents and application of  organic solutions or antioxidant agents are the most used methods in an attempt to reverse bond  strength to bleached enamel. Delaying bonding for 1 week after bleaching is sufficient to remove  any residual oxygen and reverse the bond strength to enamel, regardless the bleaching agent 
used. Alcohol and acetone used as organic solutions or solvents in dental adhesives are able  to increase the enamel bond strength, but not reestablish it completely. Enzymatic agents such  as catalase and, peroxidase; and non-enzymatic agents such as sodium ascorbate, flavonoids  and vitamin E have antioxidant properties. However, the high cost and proven efficacy only  in prolonged use hamper the clinical application of antioxidant agents. The most established  method for reversing the decreased bond strength to bleached enamel is the waiting period of  at least one week. Further studies should be conducted to evaluate the application of alcohol, 
acetone, and antioxidant agents in different concentrations and for a short period of time to be  clinically feasible and efficient in a short and long term.

Keywords

• Bleaching agents

• Dental enamel

• Tensile strength

CITATION

Ferraz LN, Oliveira ALBM, Grigoletto M, Botta AC (2018) Methods for Reversing the Bond Strength to Bleached Enamel: A Literature Review. JSM Dent 6(1): 1105.

INTRODUCTION

Bleaching is a conservative esthetic treatment to remove intrinsic and extrinsic stains on dental surface. Hydrogen and carbamide peroxides are the agents most commonly used for home and in-office whitening. Although both of agents promote a satisfactory esthetic result, they can decrease immediately the bond strength to bleached enamel [1-3].

The reduced bond strength is the result of the presence of residual oxygen that can adversely affect the adhesive polymerization [2,4-9]. This fact is enough to compromise the quality of the restoration adhered to bleached enamel and affect its clinical performance.

It has been recommended a waiting period from 24 hours to 3 weeks after bleaching to perform adhesive restorative procedures [10,11]. This period is important to eliminate the residual oxygen from dental structure and reestablish the enamel bond strength [10,11]. However, not always this waiting time is possible, because the search for immediate results and urgency for aesthetic rehabilitation.

Other methods have been proposed for the restorative procedure can be done immediately after bleaching, as the application of adhesives containing organic solvents, [6,12] organic compounds [12] and antioxidants agents [1,2,8,13]. Alcohol and acetone are able to eliminate water excess from the dental structure and increase the bond strength [14]. Antioxidant agents present in foods such as flavonoids and vitamins A, C and E can accelerate the complete release of the residual oxygen and restore the bond strength depending of their application time [14].

Based on that, dentists should be provided with scientific basis on the feasibility of each method for reversing the bond strength to enamel and choose the most effective treatment for their patients.

The aim of this study was to review the literature on methods for reversing the bond strength to bleached enamel, efficacy and clinical feasibility.

REVIEW

Dental bleaching is a conservative treatment that promotes color change through a redox reaction caused by the presence of hydrogen peroxide in the composition of bleaching agents. Ions resulting from the degradation of hydrogen peroxide as free radicals and reactive oxygen penetrate the enamel to reach dentin by diffusion and the complex molecules of pigments are transformed into smaller molecules and colorless [15,16].

Although the hydrogen and carbamide peroxides promote excellent aesthetic results, adverse effects can be observed as reduced bond strength of composite resin restorations to enamel immediately after bleaching. The decrease in adhesion is due to persistence of oxygen ions in the dental structure even after removal of the bleaching gel. This residual oxygen is responsible for inhibiting adhesive polymerization [2,5-9,17] over the resinenamel junction near the base of hybrid layer [4].

The reduced enamel bond strength becomes a problem for patients requiring aesthetic restorations after bleaching. A waiting period, the use of dental adhesives containing organic solvents and the application of organic compounds or antioxidant agents are the most used methods in the literature in an attempt to restore adhesion to bleached enamel [1,2,6,8,10-13,18].

WAITING PERIOD

Waiting for a certain period of time after the bleaching for performing adhesive procedures has proved the most common and effective method to reverse the bond strength to bleached enamel. The buffering and remineralization potential of artificial saliva minimize the adverse effects of bleaching, without interfering with the adhesion of the composite resin [11]. This period is important for the stability of dental color, removal of residual oxygen and obtains better esthetic results, which facilitates the selection of composite resin to be used [13].

According to the literature the recommended waiting period for restorative procedures on enamel after bleaching with 10% carbamide peroxide is 24 hours [4,11], 1 week [10-22] or 3 weeks [10]. The period of 24 hours is not enough to reestablish the bond strength to enamel for larger concentrations of carbamide peroxide as 16%, 20% and 22%. A waiting period from 1 [8] to 3 weeks [10] is necessary to perform restorative procedures. For 9.5%, 25%, 30%, 35% and 38% hydrogen peroxides at least 1 week must be waited for obtaining a good adhesion to bleached enamel [3,11,19,20].

In general the waiting period of 1 week is enough to eliminate all residual oxygen from bleached enamel and restore its bond strength, independent of the bleaching agent used.

Although the waiting period has advantages, conducting adhesive restorative procedures immediately after bleaching is not possible. Thus, the discussion of other methods for reversing the reduced bond strength to enamel after bleaching also becomes important.

APPLICATION OF DENTAL ADHESIVES CONTAINING ORGANIC SOLVENTS

Organic solvents such as acetone and ethanol present in the adhesives are able to interact positively with the residual oxygen and increase the bond strength to enamel [6,18]. The organic solvents promote the water displacement from the bleached tooth surface restoring the adhesion of composite resin to enamel [21].

Sung et al. [6], showed that the bond strength was restored after the use of adhesives with ethanol being similar to unbleached teeth. Other authors [21,22] observed that the presence of alcohol and acetone in dental adhesives was not enough to reverse the bond strength to enamel bleached with hydrogen peroxide in high concentration. However, a more recent study [6] showed that the enamel can be restored immediately after bleaching using acetone or ethanol based-adhesives, because these agents were able to increase the bond strength. In addition, the acetone-based adhesives showed higher resistance to shear when compared to control group. These divergent results are related to the difference in the methodologies applied in each study in relation to the type of substrate (bovine or human enamel) evaluated, method of application and concentration of the bleaching agent primarily. More concentrated peroxides produce greater adverse effects on bleached dental structure [6].

APPLICATION OF ORGANIC COMPOUNDS

Organic compounds applied on bleached enamel are able to remove residual peroxide by water extraction of hard tissues [13,23]. The major clinical availability and the lack of special storage makes ethanol and acetone agents clinically useful to reverse the reduced bond strength to enamel when esthetic procedures must be done immediately after dental bleaching [23]. Although these organic compounds increase the bond strength to bleached enamel, they are not able to reverse it completely.

Thus, further studies need to be conducted to prove its efficacy, toxicity and its effect on the longevity of adhesive restorations.

APPLICATION OF ENZYMES

The superoxide dismutase (SODs) are a class of metal cofactored enzymes discovered by Irwin Fridovich and Joe McCord that detoxify these free radicals by catalyzing the dismutation of superoxide into oxygen and hydrogen peroxide. SOD reduces and reverts superoxide-induced cell damage in the body and acts at the very starting point of the free radical generation that is superoxide ion [24]. SOD is of two types: Copper/zinc (Cu/Zn) SOD and manganese (Mn) SOD. Cu/Zn SOD defends the cytoplasm of the cells, and Mn SOD shields the mitochondria of the cells from free radical damage [25]. Kavitha et al. [24], applied the SOD for 10 minutes on the bleached enamel which resulted in a restoration of the adhesion force compatible with the application of 10% sodium ascorbate for 10 minutes. SOD is a nontoxic antioxidant which has been used for the 1st time in an in vitro application for the reversal of bond strength [24]. It provides newer avenues for advanced clinical research and exploring its further applications. However, further clinical studies are needed to confirm these findings.

ANTIOXIDANT AGENTS

Enzymatic agents such as catalase and peroxidase, and nonenzymatic agents as sodium ascorbate, flavonoids, lycopene and vitamin E have antioxidant properties [1,2,8,14,26-30].

Catalase is an enzymatic agent more effective in increasing bleached enamel adhesion than glutathione peroxidase. This is due to its mechanism of action, which requires a small number of molecules to promote an antioxidant effect. Catalase accelerates the conversion of hydrogen peroxide into oxygen and water, while glutathione peroxidase produces two hydrogen ions which react with hydrogen peroxide resulting in two molecules of water [31].

However, both enzymes are incapable of completely neutralize hydrogen peroxide when applied for a period of 20 minutes [31].

Sodium ascorbate and ascorbic acid, also known as vitamin C, are neutral, biocompatible, water soluble and they can remove the active free radicals in biological systems [14]. Due to their potent antioxidant effect, sodium ascorbate allows polymerization of free radical resin without premature interruption restoring the altered redox potential of the substrate and thus reversing the reduced adhesion [1].

These non-enzymatic agents can be used in solution or gel form without changing their antioxidant effect [9,31]. Gel of sodium ascorbate or ascorbic acid can be easily applied to a bleaching tray before composite resin procedures [2,32]. However, antioxidant solutions need to be applied on the enamel surface several times, increasing the cost and treatment period [33].

Sodium ascorbate has been evaluated at concentrations of 10%, 20% and 40%, being the first concentration more commonly used. 10% Sodium ascorbate has been shown to be effective in reversing the bond strength to bleached enamel when applied for 1 hour [32], 2 hours [34-36], 3 hours [2,9,32], 4 hours [34] or 10 hours [37]. There is no consensus in the literature regarding its use for short periods of time. Some studies report that the time application of 5 minutes [3], 10 minutes [32,34], 15 minutes [33] or 30 minutes [33,35] is not enough to reverse adhesion strength. Other studies show that the application of 10% sodium ascorbate over 10 minutes [28,38-41] or 15 minutes [42] is capable of But Alencar et al. [42], suggest that although the results are immediate and satisfactory statistically similar to the uncollated group, these values are reduced in comparison with the force of adhesion found in groups with a waiting time of 7 days, thus being safer for 7 days after bleaching to perform the adhesive restorative procedure. Good results with 10% sodium ascorbate in a short period of time has been possible when it is applied 24 hours after bleaching [43] or when the bleaching agent is used in a shorter time than recommended clinically [44]. According to Lai et al. [2], 10% sodium ascorbate should be used for at least one third of the time of the bleaching to be effective.

The application of antioxidant agents for a brief period and immediately after bleaching is essential for being clinically feasible.

Studies have shown that 10% ascorbic acid when used for 1 or 10 minutes over can create micromechanical retention on bleached enamel due to its low pH, which consequently increases the bond strength [45,46].

Antiseptic components, such as chlorhexidine, essential oils and sodium fluoride have an antioxidant potential which has been recommended for the prevention of caries lesions and periodontal diseases. However, the use of 5% potassium nitrate, 0.05% or 2% sodium fluoride has not been sufficient to neutralize the oxidative potential of 35% hydrogen peroxide [47].

Flavonoids which have the highest antioxidant properties are the anthocyanins (malvidin and pelargonidin) that are present in fruits and vegetables [16], catechins present in green tea [36] and proanthocyanidins found in high concentrations in various natural sources [48].

The malvidin and pelargonidin are non-enzymatic agents presents in cherries, strawberries, red grapes, teas, radishes, tamarind, fruits with dark pigments, and flowers. Although displaying antioxidant potential, both substances are not able to reverse the reduced bond strength to enamel when applied for 10 minutes [14].

The catechins have antioxidant, antimutagenic and anticarcinogenic properties that can prevent cardiovascular disease reduce dental erosion and periodontal inflammation. Its potent antioxidant action is justified by the presence of three adjacent hydroxyl groups that react more effectively with free radicals. The application of a 5% green tea solution for 10 minutes [49] or the application of a 10% green tea gel for 15 or 30 minutes after bleaching [33] has not been sufficient to reverse the bond strength [33,49], but the application for 1 hour after bleaching restored adhesion to enamel [36]. Epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) is an antioxidant compound present in green tea and belongs to the group of catechins [41]. Lambert and Elias [50], concluded that EGCG had antioxidant activity. The antioxidant activity of EGCG is due to its chemical formulation and polyphenolic nature. The application of 1000 μmol EGCG solution for 10 minutes was able to revert the adhesion force to bleached enamel without statistical difference of the unbleached group [41].

Proanthocyanidins, a group of polyphenolic flavonoids, are found in high concentrations in natural sources such as pine bark extract, grape seed extract, lemon peel, cranberries tree as well as the leaves of the hazel tree [48]. A solution with 5% grape seed extract applied for 10 minutes on the bleached enamel was able to avoid the decrease in bond strength after bleaching [41]. However, the same result was not obtained in the 10% concentration in which there was no reestablishment of the adhesion force to the enamel [49]. From of grape seed extract, a concentration of 6.5% of proanthocyanidin applied for 10 minutes increased the bond strength to enamel, but it was not able to reverse it completely. This may be related to the fact that the surface treatment for the molecular weight of the antioxidant should be less than 500 g/mol for the efficient elimination of free radicals. The proanthocyanidin has molecular weight of 500- 3000g/mol and it is a highly hydroxylated structure that can form insoluble complexes with proteins and carbohydrates hindering its action on the residual oxygen [50].

Pomegranate peel extract contains effective compounds such as polyphenols whose antioxidant benefits preponderate over green tea [49]. Despite this, the application of 10% pomegranate peel extract solution for 10 minutes on the bleached enamel was not able to avoid the decrease in bond strength [49].

Previous studies have shown that these herbal antioxidants can reverse the decreased bond strength of composite to bleached enamel [41,49,51]. The sage extract has demonstrated antioxidant properties is due to its polyphenolic nature and chemical formulation, however the mechanism of action has not yet been fully understood. Polyphenols such as caffeic acid, hispidulin, apigenin, rosmanol, carnosic acid, carnosol and ursolic acid are among the active ingredients. Similar to other antioxidants, these polyphenols inhibit the formation of reactive oxygen species [41,52]. The application of the 10% sage extract for 10 minutes demonstrated adhesion strength to bleached enamel compatible with unbleached teeth or treated with antioxidants such as sodium ascorbate, grape seed extract and epigallocatechin gallate [41].

The lycopene, a carotenoid compound, is a natural pigment synthesized by plants and it can be found in ripe tomatoes, red peppers, watermelons and guavas. It has a potent antiinflammatory effect due to antioxidant action and presence of free radical 5% lycopene. Although the lycopene can increase the bond strength to bleached enamel when applied for 10 minutes, its effectiveness is lower than other antioxidants such as sodium ascorbate and proanthocyanidin [53].

The α-tocopherol is the most active component of Vitamin E complex, and this organic substance is the most potent antioxidant in the lipid phase of the body. Its effectiveness in reversing the enamel bond strength has been verified when applied for 2 hours and can be attributed to active principles as methyl salicylate or the use of ethanol as a vehicle [47,54]. The application of α-tocopherol for 10 minutes is able to raise the adhesion strength to bleached enamel, but its adhesion strength is lower when compared to other antioxidants such as sodium ascorbate or the 7-day waiting period [30].This result is justified by the fact that the bond strength to bleached enamel is increased according to the period of application of an antioxidant agent [35].

Thus, the application of antioxidant agents for a short period of time has not been enough to neutralize reactive oxygen and reestablish the bond strength to bleached enamel. Although some antioxidant agents have been shown to be effective, its high cost and prolonged application become difficult its clinical use. Furthermore, the effect of these agents on the longevity of composite restorative is unknown. in vivo studies also show needed to evaluate the effect of antioxidants on the bond strength to the enamel immediately after bleaching.

CONCLUSION

Based on this literature review it was concluded that the most established method for reversing the reduced bond strength to bleached enamel is the waiting period of at least one week.

Further studies should be conducted to evaluate the application of alcohol, acetone, and antioxidant agents in different concentrations and for a short period of time to be clinically feasible and efficient in a short and long term.

REFERENCES
  1. Lai SC, Mak YF, Cheung GS, Osorio R, Toledano M, Carvalho RM, et al. Reversal of compromised bonding to oxidized etched dentin. J Dent Res. 2001; 80: 1919-1924.
  2. Lai SCN, Tay FR, Cheung GSP, Mak YF, Carvalho RM, Wei SHY, et al. Reversal of compromised bonding in bleached enamel. J Dent Res. 2002; 81: 477-481.
  3. Türkmen C, Güleryüz N, Atal? PY. Effect of sodium ascorbate and delayed treatment on the shear bond strength of composite resin to enamel following bleaching. Niger J Clin Pract. 2016; 19: 91-98.
  4. Titley KC, Torneck CD, Smith DC, Chernecky R, Adibfar A. Scanning electron microscopy observations on the penetration and structure of resin tags in bleached and unbleached bovine enamel. J Endod. 1991; 17: 72-75.
  5. Dishman MV, Covey DA, Baughan LW. The effects of peroxide bleaching on composite to enamel bond strength. Dent Mater. 1994; 10: 33-36.
  6. Sung EC, Chang SM, Mito R, Caputo AA. Effect of carbamide peroxide bleaching on the shear bond strength of composite to dental bonding agent enhanced enamel. J Prosthet Dent. 1999; 82: 595-599.
  7. Attin T, Hanning C, Wiegand A, Attin R. Effect of bleaching on restorative materials and restorations - a systematic review. Dent Mater. 2004; 20: 851-861.
  8. Turkun M, Kaya AD. Effect of 10% sodium ascorbate on the shear bond strength of composite resin to bleached bovine enamel. J Oral Rehabil. 2004; 1: 1184-1191.
  9. Kimyai S, Valizadeh H. The effect of hydrogel and solution of sodium ascorbate on bond strength in bleached enamel. Oper Dent. 2006; 31: 496-499.
  10. Cavalli V, Giannini M, Ambrosano GM. Effect of elapsed time following bleaching on enamel bond strength of resin composite. Oper Dent. 2001; 26: 597-602.
  11. Unlu N, Cobankara FK, Ozer F. Effect of elapsed time following bleaching on the shear bond strength of composite resin to enamel. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2007; 84: 363-368.
  12. Kalili T, Caputo AA, Mito R, Sperbeck G, Matyas J. In vitro toothbrush abrasion and bond strength of bleached enamel. Pract Peroidontics Aethetic Dent. 1991; 3: 22-24.
  13. Rose RC, Bode AM. Biology of free radical scavengers: an evaluation of ascorbato. FASEB J. 1993; 7: 1135-1142.
  14. Silva JMGS, Botta AC, Barcellos DC, Pagani C, Torres CRG. Effect of antioxidant agentes on bond strength of composite to bleached enamel with 38% hydrogen peroxide. Mat Res. 2011; 14: 235-238.
  15. Dahl JE, Pallesen U. Tooth bleaching- a critical review of the biological aspects. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2003; 14: 292-304.
  16. Joiner A. Review of the effects of peroxide on enamel and dentine properties. J Dent. 2007; 35: 889-896.
  17. Titley KC, Torneck CD, Ruse ND. The effect of carbamide-peroxide gel on the shear bond strength of a microfil resin to bovine enamel. J Dent Res. 1992; 71: 20-24.
  18. Barghi N, Godwib JM. Reducing the adverse effect of bleaching on composite-enamel bond. J Esthet Dent. 1994; 6: 157-161.
  19. González-López S, Medeiros CLSG, Defren CA, Bolanos-Carmona V, Sanchez-Sanchez P, et al. Demineralization effects of hydrogen peroxide on bovine enamel and relation shear Bond strength of brackets. J Adhesi Dent. 2009; 11: 461-467.
  20. Danesh-Sani SA, Esmaili M. Effect of 10% sodium ascorbate hydrogel and delayed bonding on shear bond strength of composite resin and resin-modified glass ionomer to bleached enamel. J Conserv Dent. 2011; 14: 241-246.
  21. El-Din AK, Miller BH, Griggs JA, Wakefield C. Immediate bonding to bleached enamel. Oper Dent. 2006; 31: 106-114.
  22. Montalvan E, Vaidyanathan TK, Shey Z, Janal MN, Caceda JH. The shear bond strength of acetone and ethanol-based bonding agents to bleached teeth. Pediatr Dent. 2006; 28: 531-536.
  23. Kum KY, Lim KR, Lee CY, Park KH, Safavi KE, Fouad AF, et al. Effects of removing residual peroxide and other oxygen radicals on the shear bond strength and failure modes at resin-tooth interface after tooth bleaching. Am J Dent. 2004; 17: 267-270.
  24. Kavitha M, Selvaraj S, Khetarpal A, Raj A, Pasupathy S, Shekar S. Comparative evaluation of superoxide dismutase, alpha-tocopherol, and 10% sodium ascorbate on reversal of shear bond strength of bleached enamel: An in vitro study. Eur J Dent. 2016; 10: 109-115.
  25. Petrulea M, Muresan A, Duncea I. Oxidative stress and antioxidant status in hypo? and hyperthyroidism. In: El?Missiry MA, editor. Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology “Antioxidant Enzyme”. 2012; 197?236.
  26. Lu R, Dan H, Wu R, Meng W, Liu N, Jin X, et al. Lycopene: Features and potential significance in the oral cancer and precancerous lesions. J Oral Pathol Med. 2011; 40: 361-368.
  27. Miles PG, Pontier JP, Bahiraei D, Close J. The effect of carbamide peroxide bleach on the tensile bond strength of ceramic brackets: an in vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994; 106: 371-375.
  28. Bishara SE, Onsombat C, Soliman MMA, Ajilouni R, Laffoon JF. The effect of tooth bleaching on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005; 128: 755-760.
  29. Gokçe B, Çomlekoglu ME, Ozpinar B, Turkun M, Kaya AD. Effect of antioxidant treatment on bond strength of a luting resin to bleached enamel. J Dent. 2008; 36: 780-785.
  30. Benni DB, Satyajith NN, Subbareddy VV. An in vitro study to evaluate the effect of two ethanol-based and two acetone-based dental bonding agents on the bond strength of composite to enamel treated with 10% carbamide peroxide. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2014; 32: 207-211.
  31. Torres CRG, Koga AF, Borges AB. The effects of anti-oxidante agents as neutralizers of bleaching agents on enamel bond strenght. Braz J Oral Sci. 2006; 5: 971-976.
  32. Ozelin AA, Guiraldo RD, Carvalho RV, Lopes MB, Berger SB. Effects of green tea application time on bond strength after enamel bleaching. Braz Dent J. 2014; 25: 399-403.
  33. KimyaiI S, Oskoee SS, Valizadeh H, Ajami AA, Helali ZN. Comparison of the effect of hydrogel and solution forms of sodium ascorbato on orthodontic bracket-enamel shear bond strength immediately after bleaching: an in vitro study. Indian J Dent Res. 2010; 21: 54-58.  
  34. Kaya AD, Turkun M, Arici M. Reversal of Compromised Bonding in Bleached Enamel Using Antioxidant Gel. Oper Dent. 2008; 33: 441-447.
  35.  Dabas A, Patil AC, Uppin VM. Evaluation of the effect of concentration and duration of application of sodium ascorbate hydrogel on the bond strength of composite resin to bleached enamel. J Conserv Dent. 2011; 14: 356-360.
  36.  Berger SB, De Souza CRP, Guiraldo RD, Lopes MB, Pavan S, Giannini M, et al. Can green tea be used to reverse compromised bond strength after bleaching? Eur J Oral Sci. 2013; 121: 377-381.
  37.  Mazaheri H, Khorousho M, Shafiel E, Ghorbanipour R, Majdzade F. Bond strength of composite-resin and resin-modified glass ionomer to bleached enamel: Delay bonding versus an antioxidant agent. Indian J Dent Res. 2011; 22: 432-435.
  38. Kimyai S, Oskoee SS, Rafighi A, Valizadeh H, Ajami AA, Helali ZN. Comparison of the effect of hydrogel and solution forms of sodium ascorbate on orthodontic bracket-enamel shear bond strength immediately after bleaching: An in vitro study. Indian J Dent Res. 2010; 21: 54-58.
  39.  Braham S, Ghonmode WN, Saujanya KP, Jaju N, Tambe VH, Yawalikar PP. Effect of grape seed extracts on bond strength of bleached enamel using fifth and seventh generation bonding agents. J Int Oral Health. 2013; 5: 101-107.
  40.  Güler E, Gönülol N, Özyilmaz ÖY, Yücel AÇ. Effect of sodium ascorbate on the bond strength of silorane and methacrylate composites after vital bleaching. Braz Oral Res. 2013; 27: 299-304.
  41.  Khamverdi Z, Khadem P, Soltanian A, Azizi M. In-vitro Evaluation of the Effect of Herbal Antioxidants on Shear Bond Strength of Composite Resin to Bleached Enamel. J Dent. 2016; 13: 244-251.
  42.  Alencar MS, Bombonatti JFS, Maenosono RM, Soares AF, Wang L, Mondelli RFL. Effect of Two Antioxidants Agents on Microtensile Bond Strength to Bleached Enamel. Braz Dent J. 2016; 27: 532-536.
  43.  Lima AF, Fonseca FMS, Freitas MS, Palialol ARM, Aguiar FHB, Marchi GM. Effect of bleaching treatment and reduced application time of an antioxidant on bond strength to bleached enamel and subjacent dentin. J Adhes Dent. 2011; 13: 537-542.
  44. Guler E, Gonulo N, Ozyilmaz OY, Yucel AC. Effect of sodium ascorbate on the bond strength of silorane and methacrylate composites after vital bleaching. Braz Oral Res. 2013; 27: 299-304.
  45.  Muraguchi K, Shigenobu S, Suzuki S, Tanaka T. Improvement of bonding to bleached bovine tooth surfaces by ascorbic acid treatment. Dent Mater J. 2007; 26: 875-881.
  46.  Kunt GE, Yilmaz N, Sen S, Dede DO. Effect of antioxidant treatment on the shear bond strength of composite resin to bleached enamel. Acta Odontol Scand. 2011; 69: 287-291.
  47. Garcia EJ, Oldoni TLC, Alencar SM, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Grande RHM. Antioxidant activity by DPPH assay of potential solutions to be applied on bleached teeth. Braz Dent J. 2012; 23: 22-27.
  48. Fine AM. Oligomeric Proanthocyanidin Complexes: History, Structure, and Phytopharmaceutical applications. Altern Med Rev. 2010; 5: 144-151.
  49. Sharafeddin F, Farshad F. The Effect of Aloe Vera, Pomegranate Peel, Grape Seed Extract, Green Tea, and Sodium Ascorbate as Antioxidants on the Shear Bond Strength of Composite Resin to Home-bleached Enamel. J Dent (Shiraz). 2015; 16: 296-301.
  50. Lambert JD, Elias RJ. The antioxidant and pro-oxidant activities of green tea polyphenols: A role in cancer prevention. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2010; 501: 65-72.
  51.  Khamverdi Z, Safari M. In-vitro evaluation of the effect of sage on shear bond strength of composite resin to bleached enamel. J Islam Dent (Tehran). 2013; 25: 366-372.
  52. Narayanan N, Thangavelu L. Salvia officinalis in dentistry. Dent Hypotheses. 2015; 6: 27-30.
  53.  Arumugam MT, Nesamani R, Kittappa K, Sanjees K, Sekar M. Effect of various antioxidants on the shear bond strength of composite resin to bleached enamel: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2014; 17: 22-26.
  54.  Sasaki RT, Flório FM, Basting RT. Effect of 10% sodium ascorbate and 10% alpha-tocopherol in different formulations on the shear bond strength of enamel and dentin submitted to a home-use bleaching treatment. Oper Dent. 2010; 34: 746-752.

 

Ferraz LN, Oliveira ALBM, Grigoletto M, Botta AC (2018) Methods for Reversing the Bond Strength to Bleached Enamel: A Literature Review. JSM Dent 6(1): 1105.

Received : 28 Feb 2018
Accepted : 27 Mar 2018
Published : 29 Mar 2018
Journals
Annals of Otolaryngology and Rhinology
ISSN : 2379-948X
Launched : 2014
JSM Schizophrenia
Launched : 2016
Journal of Nausea
Launched : 2020
JSM Internal Medicine
Launched : 2016
JSM Hepatitis
Launched : 2016
JSM Oro Facial Surgeries
ISSN : 2578-3211
Launched : 2016
Journal of Human Nutrition and Food Science
ISSN : 2333-6706
Launched : 2013
JSM Regenerative Medicine and Bioengineering
ISSN : 2379-0490
Launched : 2013
JSM Spine
ISSN : 2578-3181
Launched : 2016
Archives of Palliative Care
ISSN : 2573-1165
Launched : 2016
JSM Nutritional Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3203
Launched : 2017
Annals of Neurodegenerative Disorders
ISSN : 2476-2032
Launched : 2016
Journal of Fever
ISSN : 2641-7782
Launched : 2017
JSM Bone Marrow Research
ISSN : 2578-3351
Launched : 2016
JSM Mathematics and Statistics
ISSN : 2578-3173
Launched : 2014
Journal of Autoimmunity and Research
ISSN : 2573-1173
Launched : 2014
JSM Arthritis
ISSN : 2475-9155
Launched : 2016
JSM Head and Neck Cancer-Cases and Reviews
ISSN : 2573-1610
Launched : 2016
JSM General Surgery Cases and Images
ISSN : 2573-1564
Launched : 2016
JSM Anatomy and Physiology
ISSN : 2573-1262
Launched : 2016
JSM Dental Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1548
Launched : 2016
Annals of Emergency Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1017
Launched : 2016
Annals of Mens Health and Wellness
ISSN : 2641-7707
Launched : 2017
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Health Care
ISSN : 2576-0084
Launched : 2018
Journal of Chronic Diseases and Management
ISSN : 2573-1300
Launched : 2016
Annals of Vaccines and Immunization
ISSN : 2378-9379
Launched : 2014
JSM Heart Surgery Cases and Images
ISSN : 2578-3157
Launched : 2016
Annals of Reproductive Medicine and Treatment
ISSN : 2573-1092
Launched : 2016
JSM Brain Science
ISSN : 2573-1289
Launched : 2016
JSM Biomarkers
ISSN : 2578-3815
Launched : 2014
JSM Biology
ISSN : 2475-9392
Launched : 2016
Archives of Stem Cell and Research
ISSN : 2578-3580
Launched : 2014
Annals of Clinical and Medical Microbiology
ISSN : 2578-3629
Launched : 2014
JSM Pediatric Surgery
ISSN : 2578-3149
Launched : 2017
Journal of Memory Disorder and Rehabilitation
ISSN : 2578-319X
Launched : 2016
JSM Tropical Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2578-3165
Launched : 2016
JSM Head and Face Medicine
ISSN : 2578-3793
Launched : 2016
JSM Cardiothoracic Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1297
Launched : 2016
JSM Bone and Joint Diseases
ISSN : 2578-3351
Launched : 2017
JSM Bioavailability and Bioequivalence
ISSN : 2641-7812
Launched : 2017
JSM Atherosclerosis
ISSN : 2573-1270
Launched : 2016
Journal of Genitourinary Disorders
ISSN : 2641-7790
Launched : 2017
Journal of Fractures and Sprains
ISSN : 2578-3831
Launched : 2016
Journal of Autism and Epilepsy
ISSN : 2641-7774
Launched : 2016
Annals of Marine Biology and Research
ISSN : 2573-105X
Launched : 2014
JSM Health Education & Primary Health Care
ISSN : 2578-3777
Launched : 2016
JSM Communication Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3807
Launched : 2016
Annals of Musculoskeletal Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3599
Launched : 2016
Annals of Virology and Research
ISSN : 2573-1122
Launched : 2014
JSM Renal Medicine
ISSN : 2573-1637
Launched : 2016
Journal of Muscle Health
ISSN : 2578-3823
Launched : 2016
JSM Genetics and Genomics
ISSN : 2334-1823
Launched : 2013
JSM Anxiety and Depression
ISSN : 2475-9139
Launched : 2016
Clinical Journal of Heart Diseases
ISSN : 2641-7766
Launched : 2016
Annals of Medicinal Chemistry and Research
ISSN : 2378-9336
Launched : 2014
JSM Pain and Management
ISSN : 2578-3378
Launched : 2016
JSM Women's Health
ISSN : 2578-3696
Launched : 2016
Clinical Research in HIV or AIDS
ISSN : 2374-0094
Launched : 2013
Journal of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Obesity
ISSN : 2333-6692
Launched : 2013
Journal of Substance Abuse and Alcoholism
ISSN : 2373-9363
Launched : 2013
JSM Neurosurgery and Spine
ISSN : 2373-9479
Launched : 2013
Journal of Liver and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2379-0830
Launched : 2014
Journal of Drug Design and Research
ISSN : 2379-089X
Launched : 2014
JSM Clinical Oncology and Research
ISSN : 2373-938X
Launched : 2013
JSM Bioinformatics, Genomics and Proteomics
ISSN : 2576-1102
Launched : 2014
JSM Chemistry
ISSN : 2334-1831
Launched : 2013
Journal of Trauma and Care
ISSN : 2573-1246
Launched : 2014
JSM Surgical Oncology and Research
ISSN : 2578-3688
Launched : 2016
Annals of Food Processing and Preservation
ISSN : 2573-1033
Launched : 2016
Journal of Radiology and Radiation Therapy
ISSN : 2333-7095
Launched : 2013
JSM Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
ISSN : 2578-3572
Launched : 2016
Annals of Clinical Pathology
ISSN : 2373-9282
Launched : 2013
Annals of Cardiovascular Diseases
ISSN : 2641-7731
Launched : 2016
Journal of Behavior
ISSN : 2576-0076
Launched : 2016
Annals of Clinical and Experimental Metabolism
ISSN : 2572-2492
Launched : 2016
Clinical Research in Infectious Diseases
ISSN : 2379-0636
Launched : 2013
JSM Microbiology
ISSN : 2333-6455
Launched : 2013
Journal of Urology and Research
ISSN : 2379-951X
Launched : 2014
Journal of Family Medicine and Community Health
ISSN : 2379-0547
Launched : 2013
Annals of Pregnancy and Care
ISSN : 2578-336X
Launched : 2017
JSM Cell and Developmental Biology
ISSN : 2379-061X
Launched : 2013
Annals of Aquaculture and Research
ISSN : 2379-0881
Launched : 2014
Clinical Research in Pulmonology
ISSN : 2333-6625
Launched : 2013
Journal of Immunology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2333-6714
Launched : 2013
Annals of Forensic Research and Analysis
ISSN : 2378-9476
Launched : 2014
JSM Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
ISSN : 2333-7109
Launched : 2013
Annals of Breast Cancer Research
ISSN : 2641-7685
Launched : 2016
Annals of Gerontology and Geriatric Research
ISSN : 2378-9409
Launched : 2014
Journal of Sleep Medicine and Disorders
ISSN : 2379-0822
Launched : 2014
JSM Burns and Trauma
ISSN : 2475-9406
Launched : 2016
Chemical Engineering and Process Techniques
ISSN : 2333-6633
Launched : 2013
Annals of Clinical Cytology and Pathology
ISSN : 2475-9430
Launched : 2014
JSM Allergy and Asthma
ISSN : 2573-1254
Launched : 2016
Journal of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
ISSN : 2334-2307
Launched : 2013
Annals of Sports Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2379-0571
Launched : 2014
JSM Sexual Medicine
ISSN : 2578-3718
Launched : 2016
Annals of Vascular Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2378-9344
Launched : 2014
JSM Biotechnology and Biomedical Engineering
ISSN : 2333-7117
Launched : 2013
Journal of Hematology and Transfusion
ISSN : 2333-6684
Launched : 2013
JSM Environmental Science and Ecology
ISSN : 2333-7141
Launched : 2013
Journal of Cardiology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2333-6676
Launched : 2013
JSM Nanotechnology and Nanomedicine
ISSN : 2334-1815
Launched : 2013
Journal of Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders
ISSN : 2475-9473
Launched : 2016
JSM Ophthalmology
ISSN : 2333-6447
Launched : 2013
Journal of Pharmacology and Clinical Toxicology
ISSN : 2333-7079
Launched : 2013
Annals of Psychiatry and Mental Health
ISSN : 2374-0124
Launched : 2013
Medical Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
ISSN : 2333-6439
Launched : 2013
Annals of Pediatrics and Child Health
ISSN : 2373-9312
Launched : 2013
JSM Clinical Pharmaceutics
ISSN : 2379-9498
Launched : 2014
JSM Foot and Ankle
ISSN : 2475-9112
Launched : 2016
JSM Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementia
ISSN : 2378-9565
Launched : 2014
Journal of Addiction Medicine and Therapy
ISSN : 2333-665X
Launched : 2013
Journal of Veterinary Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2378-931X
Launched : 2013
Annals of Public Health and Research
ISSN : 2378-9328
Launched : 2014
Annals of Orthopedics and Rheumatology
ISSN : 2373-9290
Launched : 2013
Journal of Clinical Nephrology and Research
ISSN : 2379-0652
Launched : 2014
Annals of Community Medicine and Practice
ISSN : 2475-9465
Launched : 2014
Annals of Biometrics and Biostatistics
ISSN : 2374-0116
Launched : 2013
JSM Clinical Case Reports
ISSN : 2373-9819
Launched : 2013
Journal of Cancer Biology and Research
ISSN : 2373-9436
Launched : 2013
Journal of Surgery and Transplantation Science
ISSN : 2379-0911
Launched : 2013
Journal of Dermatology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2373-9371
Launched : 2013
JSM Gastroenterology and Hepatology
ISSN : 2373-9487
Launched : 2013
Annals of Nursing and Practice
ISSN : 2379-9501
Launched : 2014
Author Information X