Characteristic Signs and Symptoms of Duodenal Diverticula: A Case Report and a Brief Review of Literature
- 1. Department of Surgery, Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, USA
- 2. Pancreas Disease Center, Northwell Health, USA
Abstract
Introduction: Duodenal diverticula are weakened mucosal outpouchings that are most frequently located in the second portion of the duodenum, neighboring the ampulla of Vater. Most diverticula are acquired and asymptomatic.
Presentation of case: A 46-year-old female presented with complaints of recurrent intermittent epigastric pain associated with nausea and vomiting for duration of one year, and was incidentally found to have a hemoglobin level of 5.0 g/dL. She was worked up by a gastroenterologist and an upper endoscopy revealed a dilated duodenum. A CT scan confirmed the diagnosis of a duodenal diverticulum and the patient successfully underwent duodenal resection.
Discussion: Duodenal diverticula are common and are usually discovered incidentally. Here, we present a case report and a review of the literature in an effort to increase the awareness of signs, symptoms, demographics, and possible complications of small bowel diverticula. Signs and symptoms of a duodenal diverticulum are highly variable, and depend on the associated complications.
Conclusion: Duodenal diverticula are common, but are often missed by clinicians. Signs, symptoms and complications vary. Familiarity with the various modes of presentation will help clinicians diagnose and manage diverticula, as well as prevent further complications.
Keywords
• Duodenum
• Diverticulum
• Surgery
• Extraluminal
• Case report
Citation
Fatakhova K, Amodu LI, Friedman B, Macura J, Coppa G, et al. (2017) Characteristic Signs and Symptoms of Duodenal Diverticula: A Case Report and a Brief Review of Literature. JSM Med Case Rep 2(1): 1005.
ABBREVIATIONS
ALT: Alanine Aminotransferase; AST: Aspartate Aminotransferase; PO: Per Os (by mouth); CT: Computed Tomography
INTRODUCTION
Duodenal diverticula are weakened mucosaloutpouchings most frequently located in the second portion of the duodenum, around or adjacent to the ampulla of Vater [3]. The majority are acquired and asymptomatic [1,2]. Approximately 5% become symptomatic or develop further complications [4]. Clinicians often miss the diagnosis of a diverticulum since the signs and symptoms may mimic other diseases such as pancreatitis or cholecystitis. Here, we describe a patient with a case of a duodenal diverticulum and present a brief review of the literature on the subject. Our aim is to aid the clinical community in identifying the signs and symptoms of duodenal diverticula and prevent subsequent complications.
METHODS
We performed a PubMed search for Duodenal Diverticulum using keywords ‘Duodenal Diverticulum’, ‘Duodenal Diverticula’, ‘Extraluminal duodenal diverticulum’
CASE REPORT
A 46-year-old female with an uncomplicated medical history presented to our academic institution with complaints of epigastric pain associated with frequent nausea and vomiting that had been intermittent, but recurrent for a period of one year. During pre-operative testing for an abdominoplasty, the patient was found to have iron deficiency anemia with a hemoglobin level of 5.0 g/dL. A trial of oral iron supplementation did now show any improvement, and the patient subsequently underwent a gastroenterology evaluation. She received several intravenous iron infusions with much improvement of her hemoglobin level. Pre-operative laboratory findings were: white blood cell count 7,200 u/l, hemoglobin 9.4 g/dl, hematocrit 34.2, AST 203 u/l, ALT 350 u/l, alkaline phosphatase 296 u/l, and total bilirubin 0.5 mg/dl.
An upper endoscopy showed a dilated duodenum. Upon further evaluation by Computed Tomography (CT) of the abdomen and pelvis, the patient was found to have a windsock diverticulum of the duodenum in addition to cholelithiasis (Figure 1,2)
Figure 1: Axial IV and oral contrast enhanced CT view demonstrates a windsock duodenal diverticulum (red arrows) extending into the third portion of the duodenum (blue arrows).
Figure 2: Coronal IV and oral contrast enhanced CT view demonstrates a windsock duodenal diverticulum (red arrows) extending into the third portion of the duodenum (blue arrows)
The gastroenterologist following her believed the gastroenterology symptoms and iron deficiency anemia most likely were attributed to the duodenal diverticulum, although there were no signs of active bleeding on regular colonoscopy. While, cholelithiasis could in fact have played a role in her symptoms, the duodenal diverticulum was large and was compressing the lumen. In an effort to avoid complications, the patient consented to a cholecystectomy and a duodenal resection.
Under general anesthesia, the patient underwent a laparoscopic cholecystectomy, laparoscopic mobilization of the duodenum, upper endoscopy, open duodenostomy, resection of a large duodenal diverticulum, and closure of the duodenostomy. During the operation it was noted that the patient’s diverticulum was filled with debris and food, which completely compressed the lumen of the bowel. The opening of the duodenum was small and compressed by the sac of the diverticulum. Her postoperative course was uneventful and the patient was discharged on post-operative day four.
DISCUSSION
Duodenal diverticula are bulging protrusions of the duodenum, commonly located in the second portion, near the ampulla of Vater [5]. Duodenal diverticula can be classified as extraluminal or intraluminal. Intraluminal are classically congenital and occur due to incomplete recanalization of the intestinal lumen [6]. Extraluminal are the most common type, and are acquired due to herniation of weakened mucosa by protruding large vessels [6], and can be further delineated into peri-ampullaryduodenal diverticula or juxtapapillary duodenal diverticula, depending on their location [7]. The former is located adjacent to or in the ampulla of Vater while the latter is commonly found approximately 2 cm from the ampulla of Vater [7].
Due to the asymptomatic nature, many duodenal diverticula are incidental findings during upper endoscopies or barium studies [1]. The incidence of duodenal diverticula is estimated to be around 20% in the general healthy population [8]. No specific gender predilection exists. It is rare to develop one before the age of 40, and peak incidence occurs between 50 to 70 years of age [2]. The most common symptoms are upper abdominal pain radiating to the back, intermittent diarrhea, constipation and weight loss [9,10]. The differential diagnosis for small bowel diverticulum is acute or chronic pancreatitis, cholecystitis, small bowel obstruction, or peptic ulcer disease [2-4]. The location of the duodenal diverticulum plays an important role in the nature of its complications. The closer the diverticulum is to the ampulla of Vater, the higher the chance of gallstone formation in the common bile duct [7]. As the duodenum compresses the ampulla of Vater, there is more pressure on the common bile duct and pancreatic duct, which may lead to other complications such as cholangitis, cholelithiasis and pancreatitis. If left untreated, a perforated diverticulum may lead to a more complicated surgical management [4].
Table 1 displays several cases of duodenal diverticula and subsequent complications reported in the literature. Symptoms varied from right upper quadrant pain, epigastric pain, to generalized abdominal pain. The location of the diverticulum was mostly the second part of the duodenum. In this case report, the patient had experienced intermittentepigastric pain for one year, but did not have any complications such as diverticular bleeding or perforation. The patients presented in Table 1 presented with more severe symptoms due to their complications. Our case report and literature review focus on the signs and symptoms of duodenal diverticula and the possible complications if left untreated or undiagnosed. More attention should be placed on the possibility of a duodenal diverticulum in patients presenting with epigastric and right upper quadrant pain associated with nausea and vomiting.
Table 1: Signs, symptoms, treatments and outcomes in published duodenal diverticulum case reports.
Ref # | Age | Sex | Signs & Symptoms | Location/ Size of DD | Diagnostic Imaging | Complications | Treatment | Outcome |
Matuso,et al [11]. | 68 | F | Black Stools | Third part of the duodenum (Horizontal portion) | Endoscopy CT with contrast | Diverticular bleeding | Hemostasis achieved by endoscopic clip | No evidence of re-bleeding after a year |
Song, S [1]. | 53 | M | -Sudden onset of right abdominal pain. -RUQ tenderness with associated rebound tenderness and guarding. | Second part of the duodenum | CT with contrast | Duodenal Perforation and foreign material found | Diverticulectomy and removal of foreign material | No complaints of discomfort after one year |
Song, S [1]. | 73 | M | -Right upper abdominal pain, postprandial in nature. -RUQ tenderness with rebound tenderness. | Second part of the duodenum 2.7 cm | CT with contrast | Duodenal perforation | Conservative treatment with antibiotics for 18 days. | Endoscopy showed that the perforation was healed after 18 days. |
Kassir, R. et al. [12]. | 79 | M | Generalized abdominal pain and altered bowel habits. | Jejunum | CT with contrast | Duodenal Perforation | -Laparotomy -Forty centimeters of jejunum resected -End to end anastomosis | Postoperative period uncomplicated |
Majerus, B. et al. [5]. | 65 | F | -Severe epigastric pain and nausea immediately after trauma -Abdominal guarding | Second part of duodenum 5.0 cm | CT with contrast | Duodenal Perforation | Laparotomy Diverticulectomy | Patient was asymptomatic 4 years after surgery. |
Rizwann, MM. et al. [2]. | 69 | M | -Upper abdominal pain radiating to the back -Epigastric tenderness | Second part of duodenum | ERCP | None | Conservative management | Asymptomatic 1 year follow up |
Martínez,CD, et al. [8]. | 85 | F | -Intense thoracic pain radiating to the upper abdomen accompanied by nausea and vomiting | Second part of duodenum | Gastrografin study | -Abscess surrounding the diverticula and another one retrohepatic and subdiaphragmatic | -Both abscesses were drained -Hospital length was 20 days. | Asymptomatic 6 month follow up. |
Abbreviations: DD- Duodenal Diverticulum; CT- Computed Tomography |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
We would like to acknowledge the efforts of Mrs. Renee Cercone for helping with the editing of this manuscript.