Loading

JSM Pain and Management

Pain in Advanced Breast Cancer in Uganda

Short Communication | Open Access Volume 2 | Issue 1 |

  • 1. Little Hospice Hoima, Hospice Africa Uganda
  • 2. Hospice Africa Uganda, Kampala
  • 3. Professor of Palliative Care, Makerere University and the Institute of Palliative Care, Hospice Africa Uganda
+ Show More - Show Less
Corresponding Authors
Little Hospice Hoima, Hospice Africa Uganda,
Abstract

Background: Breast cancer incidence in sub-Saharan Africa is on the rise. Often, owing to poor access to healthcare services, it presents late and tumours are often inoperable. This gives rise to a burden of pain associated with tumour growth that is rarely present in countries with more developed healthcare systems.

Purpose: To understand more fully the burden of pain associated with breast cancer: the causes and management.

Method: A retrospective analysis of patients enrolled under Hospice Africa Uganda, at Little Hospice Hoima. Using data from their files, pain scores, descriptions and management will be assessed. Patients will be divided into non-mastectomy and mastectomy groups so as to better understand the causes of pain.

Results: Sixty-seven files were analysed (66 female, 1 male), mean average age 52: of these, 47 never underwent mastectomy (Group A), 7 had mastectomy while under Little Hospice Hoima and 13 had mastectomy prior to enrolment. Those following mastectomy generally had a lower pain score than those associated with tumour growth. Both groups had a high burden of neuropathic pain, with those having undergone mastectomy tending to suffer more from neuropathy than those who had not. In general, those in Group B reported an improvement in pain severity following mastectomy. In Group C, 38% were taking opioid analgesia and 69% were taking an adjuvant (amitriptylline). In contrast, among those in Group A 60% were taking an opioid, while only 40% were taking adjuvant therapy. 40% of patients had tried herbal therapy before presenting to health services, contributing towards late presentation and advanced disease stage.

Conclusion: This analysis shows on a small-scale that the burden of neuropathic pain in breast cancer among both non-mastectomy and mastectomy patients is significant and should always be considered when prescribing analgesia. In line with WHO guidelines on types of cancer pain, those patients likely to be suffering from ‘nerve compression pain’ (i.e. those with significant tumour growth) were more likely to be on opioid analgesia than those with ‘nerve injury pain’ (i.e. post-mastectomy), who were more likely to be taking amitriptyline, either as an adjuvant drug or by itself. However, there is a significant amount of crossover between the two groups and each patient should be managed according to their specific pain descriptions and clinical assessment.

Citation

Hughes EC, Zirimenya L, Merriman A (2017) Pain in Advanced Breast Cancer in Uganda. JSM Pain Manag 2(1): 1006.

BACKGROUND

The incidence of breast cancer in economically developing countries such as Uganda is on the rise. Whilst cervical cancer remains the most common female cancer in Uganda, breast cancer is second, with an incidence increase rate of 3.7% [1]. Between 1961 and 1995 the incidence doubled from 11 per 100,000 to 22 per 100,000[2] and in 2010, the age-standardised incidence rate was 31.2 per 100,000 [1]. This is thought to be a result of changes in lifestyle (e.g. changes in reproductive patterns, increased obesity, physical inactivity), increased survival from other diseases and longer life expectancy and an increase in screening and diagnosis. However, there is still a great number of patients presenting late, with advanced disease. Some studies have shown that up to 87% of women with breast cancer in developing countries present with late disease [3]. A study in Ghana revealed over half of their subjects presented at Stages 3 or 4 [4].

It is widely agreed across breast cancer literature that presenting symptoms are often physical changes: a lump, skin changes, nipple tethering or discharge. Medscape [5] states that only 5% of patients with a malignant mass present with breast pain, and Cancer Research[6] advise on their website that breast pain is ‘not normally due to cancer’. In a study of 37 Hong Kong Chinese women, 36 of them presented with a lump and one with nipple discharge [7]. In the aforementioned study conducted in Ghana, 76% presented with a lump and none presented with breast pain [4]. On the other hand, a study conducted in Nigeria [8] found that ‘breast pain was a statistically significant presentation in patients with malignant breast disease’.

Pain was found to be one of the top ten most prevalent symptoms among patients on the Palliative Medicine Program of the Cleveland Clinic [9], and a systematic review [10] found that over 50% of patients with advanced cancer suffered from fatigue, pain, lack of energy, weakness and appetite loss. Despite WHO recommendations [11] on effective pain management in cancer patients, a study published in 2007 [12] demonstrated that 64% of patients categorized as having advanced, metastatic or terminal disease suffered from pain. Across all of the cancer patients included in the study, over one-third scored their pain as moderate or severe. In countries where healthcare services are accessible and screening programmes more widely established, cancer rarely presents for the first time as ‘advanced’. However in countries such as Uganda, presentation, diagnosis and treatment can all be delayed, giving rise to a greater number of patients with advanced and painful disease.

Moreover, a difference in causes of pain exists between patients who have undergone mastectomy (post-mastectomy pain or PMP) and those who have pain related to tumour growth. This will be discussed further later, but it is also important to highlight the distinction between nociceptive and neuropathic pain, as each warrants specific pharmacological management and will be explored in this study. Nociceptive pain is usually described as ‘throbbing’ or ‘aching’, while neuropathic pain is ‘pricking’, ‘burning’ or the sensation might be described as insects crawling or biting. Typically adjuvant therapy such as amitriptyline is used for the latter - through a number of pharmacological actions [13] including blocking noradrenaline and serotonin re-uptake, it has been shown to have an effect on central pain mechanisms. Tricyclic antidepressants have been shown to relieve pain in one in every 2-3 patients with peripheral neuropathic pain. While opioid analgesia[14] tends to be more effective in patients with nociceptive pain, it has been shown to have some benefit in relieving neuropathic pain as well, particularly peripherally. Consequently, pain management in breast cancer patients cannot be categorized absolutely: causes, effects and complex pharmacological interactions combine to give rise to a complicated and individual pain experience for each patient (Figure 1).

Figure 1 A patient with an advanced breast tumour

Figure 1 A patient with an advanced breast tumour.

OBJECTIVES

This study was undertaken to further understand the type and severity of pain in advanced breast cancer patients. Further, it enhances understanding of the causes of pain in a breast cancer patient: both post-mastectomy pain and pain as a direct result of the tumour will be explored. In this way, management of pain in breast cancer patients can be better executed.

METHOD

Little Hospice Hoima (LHH) is a branch of Hospice Africa Uganda (HAU) and provides palliative care services to 590 adults and children in the Albertine region of Uganda. The majority of patients enrolled have cancer and/or HIV.

A retrospective analysis of patient records was carried out. Seventy patients with breast cancer enrolled on the programme since 2010 were selected at random and their files analysed. Patients were divided into three groups: Group A never underwent mastectomy, Group B underwent mastectomy whilst on the programme and Group C had already undergone mastectomy on enrolment to the programme. Each file was then analysed according to mention of breast pain on admission, the severity of pain and the description. Type of analgesia prescribed was also recorded: either non-opioid only (step 1 on the WHO analgesic ladder) [11] opioids and/or an adjuvant (in this setting, the adjuvant was always amitriptyline). Group B were analysed specifically to see whether there was an improvement in pain severity and/or change in description of pain following mastectomy.

Other treatment protocols such as chemo- and radiotherapy were also recorded, as was the number of those who had undergone biopsy, and those who had used herbal treatment. Finally, patient outcomes were analysed.

Pain was scored using a scale 0-5, with 0 being equivalent to no pain and 5 being unbearable. Patients under HAU are asked to score their pain using either the ‘hand scale’ or a visual scale depicting jerry cans at various levels of ‘fullness’, with the empty can representing ‘no pain’ and the fullest representing the most pain [15].

RESULTS

Seventy patient files were analysed, with three files being excluded from the study. One of these patients had a lumpectomy that revealed fibroadenoma and another had mastectomy which subsequently revealed no cancerous cells. The third, on close analysis of the file, never had a biopsy and clinically did not appear to have a malignancy despite being referred as a cancer patient.

One patient was male and the age range was 16 -94, with an average age of 52 (Table 1) (Figure 2-4)

Figure 2-4 Over 80% of both Groups A and B reported pain, with over half of both groups scoring their pain at 3-5 (considered as ‘moderate-severe’). Only 38% of Group  C (those who have undergone mastectomy at the time of scoring) give a severity of 3 or 4, with none scoring their pain as 5

.Figure 2-4 Over 80% of both Groups A and B reported pain, with over half of both groups scoring their pain at 3-5 (considered as ‘moderate-severe’). Only 38% of Group C (those who have undergone mastectomy at the time of scoring) give a severity of 3 or 4, with none scoring their pain as 5

The words ‘burning’ and ‘pricking’ were used most commonly in both groups (Figure 5). This suggests a predominance of neuropathic rather than nociceptive pain. ‘Insect biting’ and ‘Insect crawling’ are also common ways to describe neuropathic pain. Taking this into account, the post-mastectomy patients described their pain as neuropathic more than twice as often as nociceptive. The ratio of nociceptive vs neuropathic pain described by the non-mastectomy group was 1:1.3, suggesting a more equal distribution between both types of pain in those with tumour-related symptoms.

Figure 2-4 Over 80% of both Groups A and B reported pain, with over half of both groups scoring their pain at 3-5 (considered as ‘moderate-severe’). Only 38% of Group  C (those who have undergone mastectomy at the time of scoring) give a severity of 3 or 4, with none scoring their pain as 5.

Figure 2-4 Over 80% of both Groups A and B reported pain, with over half of both groups scoring their pain at 3-5 (considered as ‘moderate-severe’). Only 38% of Group C (those who have undergone mastectomy at the time of scoring) give a severity of 3 or 4, with none scoring their pain as 5.

(Table 2) shows the types of analgesia prescribed throughout the patients’ enrolment on the programme. None of the patients was receiving either opioids or an adjuvant prior to enrolling under Little Hospice Hoima. Only 8 patients out of 67 had pain that was managed with simple analgesia only. Over half required opioids, and nearly half required an adjuvant for neuropathic pain. The majority (69%) of patients who had undergone mastectomy prior to being enrolled were prescribed an adjuvant, whereas fewer than half were taking morphine. In those with purely tumour-related breast pain (Group A), 60% required opioid analgesia, and 40% were receiving amitriptyline.

The seven patients in Group B were analysed separately in order to assess whether there had been any change in their pain following mastectomy. There was no patient that reported consistently worse pain post-operatively. One patient reported pricking pain at 3/5 (previously had been ‘insect biting at 2/5) 3 months post-mastectomy but at 5 months was not taking any analgesia, with a pain score of 0/5. The other cases had similar positive pain outcomes.

(Table 3) shows the other treatment protocols that patients underwent. Barriers to receiving radio-and chemotherapy were most often lack of financial means, lack of carer to accompany the patient to Kampala and lack of radiotherapy services since the machine broke in April 2016. Many patients had been seeking help from traditional healers and herbal medicines prior to seeking attention from health services - often a contributing factor towards delayed presentation (Table 4).

Unfortunately, a large proportion of patients in the study were ‘lost to follow-up’, the majority of whom were in Group A. It makes it difficult therefore to interpret the rest of this data with regards to mortality rates. The patient that self-discharged preferred to continue with herbal medicines as she felt that they were providing some relief. 48% of the patients taking herbal medicine were documented as having died, with a further 37% lost to follow-up.

Finally, files were analysed for evidence of a biopsy having been carried out. Only 29 (43% of all patients) had reported having had a biopsy - this number includes all those patients from Groups B and C who had a mastectomy and it is presumed that the tissue was sent for histology. Out of all those that had a biopsy, only 13 had histology results documented in their files - the remaining 16 verbally reported that the results were ‘positive’ but were unaware of types or staging. Again, barriers to obtaining biopsies included financial constraints, as well as fear and poor health services. A number of patients remained in hospital for many weeks without undergoing biopsy. An example of this was a lady in her forties who presented with lumps extending from the tail of her breast into the axilla. She was kept on the ward for six weeks, without a biopsy being taken, before she absconded in frustration and died a few weeks later at home.

Table 1: The number of patients in each group and how many reported pain on initial clerking (NB: Groups A and B were ‘non-mastectomy’ at point of enrolment). The patients in Group C had undergone mastectomy from 1 week up to 20 years prior to enrolment.

Group  No Pain on enrolment (%)
A 46 38 (83)
B  7 6 (86)
C 14 10 (71)

Table 2: shows the types of analgesia prescribed throughout the patients’ enrolment on the programme. None of the patients was receiving either opioids or an adjuvant prior to enrolling under Little Hospice Hoima.

  Simple (%) Opioid (%) Adjuvant (%)
A 6 (13) 28 (60) 19 (40)
B 1 (14) 6 (86) 4 (9)
C 1(8) 5 (38) 9 (69)

Table 3: shows the other treatment protocols that patients underwent. Barriers to receiving radio-and chemotherapy were most often lack of financial means, lack of carer to accompany the patient to Kampala and lack of radiotherapy services since the machine broke in April 2016. Many patients had been seeking help from traditional healers and herbal medicines prior to seeking attention from health services - often a contributing factor towards delayed presentation

  Radiotherapy Chemotherapy Herbal
A 1 3 20
B 0 3 4
C 7 11 3

 Table 4: large proportion of patients in the study were ‘lost to follow-up’,.

  RIP Lost to follow-up Active Dis-charge Self-discharge
A 19 20 6 0 1
B 3 1 3 0 0
C 6 4 3 1 0
DISCUSSION

The results show a high incidence of breast pain in advanced cancer patients. Specifically, there is a predominance of neuropathic pain in both groups. Despite this, there is a much lower proportion of those with neuropathic pain secondary to tumour growth who are receiving adjuvant medication such as amitriptyline, compared to the patients suffering chronic post-mastectomy pain.

Chronic neuropathic pain is a recognised post-operative risk following mastectomy, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. The breast tissue is supplied primarily by the 4th to 6th intercostal nerves, but also receives innervation from the long thoracic, thoracodorsal and intercostobrachial nerves. Jung et al. [16], describe four categories of chronic neuropathic pain syndromes following breast cancer surgery: phantom breast pain, intercostobrachial neuralgia, neuroma pain and other nerve injury pain. Damage to the intercostobrachial nerve during surgery is a known risk and can lead to what has commonly been described as ‘post-mastectomy pain syndrome’ (PMPS). This might give rise to pain at the axilla, medial upper arm and the anterior chest wall, although more often causes loss of sensation to these areas, rather than pain. Neuromas account for much of the ‘scar pain’ described by patients and occur when damage to peripheral nerves occurs and neuromas develop in scar tissue. It is therefore suitable that many of the post-mastectomy patients presenting with pain have been commenced on adjuvant medication such as amitriptyline.

Pain as a result of tumour growth is less widely discussed. An article in The Lancet from 1999 discusses the management of cancer pain and describes a number of tumour-related pain syndromes, both nociceptive and neuropathic in origin [17]. The WHO has released guidelines on the classification of neuropathic cancer pain and divides it into nerve compression pain (NCP), nerve injury pain (NIP) and sympathetic maintenance pain (SMP) [11]. It highlights the importance of differentiating between the burning sensation felt with NIP, which tends to be dermatomal in distribution, and the burning pain with SMP, which has an arterial distribution. The treatment for each differs, with SMP often benefitting from a sympathetic block with local anaesthetic. NIP responds best to an adjuvant. NCP may be treated successfully with opioid analgesia, but often only if a corticosteroid is added.

In general, pain had a higher prevalence and tended to be more severe in those patients who did not undergo mastectomy (i.e. tumour-related pain). This is further backed by evidence provided by those that underwent mastectomy whilst on the programme, who reported less pain post-operatively, and some were even able to come off analgesia altogether. This is an important observation, as it highlights the potential benefits of ‘palliative mastectomy’, although usually those who would not benefit from ‘curable mastectomy’ are often too unwell to be considered for surgery.

A significant proportion (40%) of the patients with advanced breast cancer had pursued herbal therapies prior to presenting to health services. This is a large contributory factor towards late presentation of cancer patients. The study also highlights the relative lack of availability of services in Uganda such as chemo- and radiotherapy. Many patients who had undergone mastectomy were unable to receive these therapies following surgery owing to financial constraints (Figure 6).

LIMITATIONS

Many patients were unfortunately lost to follow-up, as their contact phone numbers became unavailable. This had a detrimental effect when considering long-term outcome of patients. The lack of biopsy for over half of the patients being treated clinically as breast cancer also poses a challenge when analysing the data. Although three files were excluded on the basis of negative histology results and poor clinical probability, it is possible that there were other patients included who did not in fact have a malignancy - some of these might account for those ‘lost to follow-up’. Furthermore, there was a lack of data to confirm an improvement following treatment with a specific analgesic drug - although sometimes scores were recorded following commencement of analgesia, they still tended to vary between consultations and therefore became difficult to interpret accurately. However in general, every patient found at least some relief from the analgesia they were commenced on. Finally, both post-chemotherapy and radiotherapy pain are recognised phenomena. Again this study did not allow for accurate assessment of whether these accounted for the pain as many of the patients had undergone both modalities of treatment, as well as mastectomy, prior to presentation at Little Hospice Hoima.

CONCLUSION

In the developed world there is less need for education on how breast tumours themselves might cause pain, as patients tend to present earlier and receive timely management with intent to cure. Public advice regarding breast pain stresses that it is unlikely to be caused by a malignancy, and although it is rarely the first symptom to be noted, it is an important aspect of care for patients with advanced, inoperable and incurable disease in Uganda. More education and awareness of the causes and management of different types of pain experienced in breast cancer, both as a direct result of tumour growth and following mastectomy, is needed.

REFERENCES

1. Wabinga HR, Nambooze S, Amulen PM, Okello C, Mbus L, Parkin DM.Trends in the incidence of cancer in Kampala, Uganda 1991-2010. Int J Cancer. 2014; 135: 432-439.

2. Gakwaya A, Galukande M, Luwaga A, Jombwe J, Fualal J, KiguliMalwadde E, et al. Breast Cancer Guidelines for Uganda (2nd Ed). Afr Health Sci. 2008; 8: 126-132.

3. Ajekigbe AT. Fear of Mastectomy: the most common factor responsible for late presentation of carcinoma of the breast in Nigeria. Clin Oncol 1991; 3: 78-80.

4. Mensah S, Dogbe J, Kyei I, Addofoh N, Paintsil V, Tutu OL. Determinants of Late Presentation and Histologic Types of Breast Cancer in Women Presenting at a Teaching Hospital in Kumasi, Ghana. J Cancer Prev Curr Res. 2015; 3: 00089.

5. Chalasani P. Breast Cancer Clinical Presentation. 2017.

6. Breast cancer. Cancer Research. UK.

7. Lam WWT, Fielding R, Chan M, Or A. Factors influencing delayed presentation with symptomatic breast cancer in Hong Kong Chinese women. Hong Kong Med J. 2009; 15: 4-7.

8. Ayoade BA, Tade AO, Salami BA. Clinical Features and Pattern of Presentation of Breast Diseases in Surgical Outpatient Clinic of a Suburban Tertiary Hospital in South-West Nigeria. Niger J Surg. 2012; 18: 13-16.

9. Walsh D, Donnelly S, Rybicki L. The symptoms of advanced cancer: relationship to age, gender, and performance status in 1000 patients. Supportive Care in Cancer. 2000; 8: 175-179.

10. Teunissen SC, Wesker W, Kruitwagen C, de Haes HC, Voest EE, de Graeff A. Symptom Prevalence in Patients with Incurable Cancer: A Systematic Review. J Pain and Symptom Management. 2007; 34: 94- 104.

11. Cancer Pain Relief: with a guide to opioid availability - 2nd Ed. World Health Organization 1996.

12. Van den Beuken-van Everdingen MHJ, de Rijke JM, Kessels AG, Schouten HC, van Kleef M, Patijn J. Prevalence of pain in patients with cancer: a systematic review of the past 40 years. Ann Oncol. 2007; 18: 1437-1449.

13. Sindrup SH, Otto M, Finnerup NB, Jensen TS. Antidepressants in the Treatment of Neuropathic Pain. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2005; 96: 399-409.

14. Smith HS. Opioids and Neuropathic Pain. Pain Physician. 2012; 15: ES93-ES110.

15. Blum D, Selman LE, Agupio G, Mashao T, Mmoledi K, Moll T, et al. Self-report measurement of pain and symptoms in palliative care patients: a comparison of verbal, visual and hand scoring methods in Sub-Saharan Africa. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2014; 12: 118.

16. Jung BF, Ahrendt GM, Oaklander AL, Dworkin RH. Neuropathic pain following breast cancer surgery: proposed classification and research update. Pain. 2003; 104: 1-13.

17. Portenoy RK, Lesage P. Management of cancer pain. The Lancet. 1999; 353: 1695-1700.

 

Hughes EC, Zirimenya L, Merriman A (2017) Pain in Advanced Breast Cancer in Uganda. JSM Pain Manag 2(1): 1006

Received : 04 Feb 2017
Accepted : 16 Mar 2017
Published : 20 Mar 2017
Journals
Annals of Otolaryngology and Rhinology
ISSN : 2379-948X
Launched : 2014
JSM Schizophrenia
Launched : 2016
Journal of Nausea
Launched : 2020
JSM Internal Medicine
Launched : 2016
JSM Hepatitis
Launched : 2016
JSM Oro Facial Surgeries
ISSN : 2578-3211
Launched : 2016
Journal of Human Nutrition and Food Science
ISSN : 2333-6706
Launched : 2013
JSM Regenerative Medicine and Bioengineering
ISSN : 2379-0490
Launched : 2013
JSM Spine
ISSN : 2578-3181
Launched : 2016
Archives of Palliative Care
ISSN : 2573-1165
Launched : 2016
JSM Nutritional Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3203
Launched : 2017
Annals of Neurodegenerative Disorders
ISSN : 2476-2032
Launched : 2016
Journal of Fever
ISSN : 2641-7782
Launched : 2017
JSM Bone Marrow Research
ISSN : 2578-3351
Launched : 2016
JSM Mathematics and Statistics
ISSN : 2578-3173
Launched : 2014
Journal of Autoimmunity and Research
ISSN : 2573-1173
Launched : 2014
JSM Arthritis
ISSN : 2475-9155
Launched : 2016
JSM Head and Neck Cancer-Cases and Reviews
ISSN : 2573-1610
Launched : 2016
JSM General Surgery Cases and Images
ISSN : 2573-1564
Launched : 2016
JSM Anatomy and Physiology
ISSN : 2573-1262
Launched : 2016
JSM Dental Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1548
Launched : 2016
Annals of Emergency Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1017
Launched : 2016
Annals of Mens Health and Wellness
ISSN : 2641-7707
Launched : 2017
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Health Care
ISSN : 2576-0084
Launched : 2018
Journal of Chronic Diseases and Management
ISSN : 2573-1300
Launched : 2016
Annals of Vaccines and Immunization
ISSN : 2378-9379
Launched : 2014
JSM Heart Surgery Cases and Images
ISSN : 2578-3157
Launched : 2016
Annals of Reproductive Medicine and Treatment
ISSN : 2573-1092
Launched : 2016
JSM Brain Science
ISSN : 2573-1289
Launched : 2016
JSM Biomarkers
ISSN : 2578-3815
Launched : 2014
JSM Biology
ISSN : 2475-9392
Launched : 2016
Archives of Stem Cell and Research
ISSN : 2578-3580
Launched : 2014
Annals of Clinical and Medical Microbiology
ISSN : 2578-3629
Launched : 2014
JSM Pediatric Surgery
ISSN : 2578-3149
Launched : 2017
Journal of Memory Disorder and Rehabilitation
ISSN : 2578-319X
Launched : 2016
JSM Tropical Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2578-3165
Launched : 2016
JSM Head and Face Medicine
ISSN : 2578-3793
Launched : 2016
JSM Cardiothoracic Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1297
Launched : 2016
JSM Bone and Joint Diseases
ISSN : 2578-3351
Launched : 2017
JSM Bioavailability and Bioequivalence
ISSN : 2641-7812
Launched : 2017
JSM Atherosclerosis
ISSN : 2573-1270
Launched : 2016
Journal of Genitourinary Disorders
ISSN : 2641-7790
Launched : 2017
Journal of Fractures and Sprains
ISSN : 2578-3831
Launched : 2016
Journal of Autism and Epilepsy
ISSN : 2641-7774
Launched : 2016
Annals of Marine Biology and Research
ISSN : 2573-105X
Launched : 2014
JSM Health Education & Primary Health Care
ISSN : 2578-3777
Launched : 2016
JSM Communication Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3807
Launched : 2016
Annals of Musculoskeletal Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3599
Launched : 2016
Annals of Virology and Research
ISSN : 2573-1122
Launched : 2014
JSM Renal Medicine
ISSN : 2573-1637
Launched : 2016
Journal of Muscle Health
ISSN : 2578-3823
Launched : 2016
JSM Genetics and Genomics
ISSN : 2334-1823
Launched : 2013
JSM Anxiety and Depression
ISSN : 2475-9139
Launched : 2016
Clinical Journal of Heart Diseases
ISSN : 2641-7766
Launched : 2016
Annals of Medicinal Chemistry and Research
ISSN : 2378-9336
Launched : 2014
JSM Women's Health
ISSN : 2578-3696
Launched : 2016
Clinical Research in HIV or AIDS
ISSN : 2374-0094
Launched : 2013
Journal of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Obesity
ISSN : 2333-6692
Launched : 2013
Journal of Substance Abuse and Alcoholism
ISSN : 2373-9363
Launched : 2013
JSM Neurosurgery and Spine
ISSN : 2373-9479
Launched : 2013
Journal of Liver and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2379-0830
Launched : 2014
Journal of Drug Design and Research
ISSN : 2379-089X
Launched : 2014
JSM Clinical Oncology and Research
ISSN : 2373-938X
Launched : 2013
JSM Bioinformatics, Genomics and Proteomics
ISSN : 2576-1102
Launched : 2014
JSM Chemistry
ISSN : 2334-1831
Launched : 2013
Journal of Trauma and Care
ISSN : 2573-1246
Launched : 2014
JSM Surgical Oncology and Research
ISSN : 2578-3688
Launched : 2016
Annals of Food Processing and Preservation
ISSN : 2573-1033
Launched : 2016
Journal of Radiology and Radiation Therapy
ISSN : 2333-7095
Launched : 2013
JSM Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
ISSN : 2578-3572
Launched : 2016
Annals of Clinical Pathology
ISSN : 2373-9282
Launched : 2013
Annals of Cardiovascular Diseases
ISSN : 2641-7731
Launched : 2016
Journal of Behavior
ISSN : 2576-0076
Launched : 2016
Annals of Clinical and Experimental Metabolism
ISSN : 2572-2492
Launched : 2016
Clinical Research in Infectious Diseases
ISSN : 2379-0636
Launched : 2013
JSM Microbiology
ISSN : 2333-6455
Launched : 2013
Journal of Urology and Research
ISSN : 2379-951X
Launched : 2014
Journal of Family Medicine and Community Health
ISSN : 2379-0547
Launched : 2013
Annals of Pregnancy and Care
ISSN : 2578-336X
Launched : 2017
JSM Cell and Developmental Biology
ISSN : 2379-061X
Launched : 2013
Annals of Aquaculture and Research
ISSN : 2379-0881
Launched : 2014
Clinical Research in Pulmonology
ISSN : 2333-6625
Launched : 2013
Journal of Immunology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2333-6714
Launched : 2013
Annals of Forensic Research and Analysis
ISSN : 2378-9476
Launched : 2014
JSM Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
ISSN : 2333-7109
Launched : 2013
Annals of Breast Cancer Research
ISSN : 2641-7685
Launched : 2016
Annals of Gerontology and Geriatric Research
ISSN : 2378-9409
Launched : 2014
Journal of Sleep Medicine and Disorders
ISSN : 2379-0822
Launched : 2014
JSM Burns and Trauma
ISSN : 2475-9406
Launched : 2016
Chemical Engineering and Process Techniques
ISSN : 2333-6633
Launched : 2013
Annals of Clinical Cytology and Pathology
ISSN : 2475-9430
Launched : 2014
JSM Allergy and Asthma
ISSN : 2573-1254
Launched : 2016
Journal of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
ISSN : 2334-2307
Launched : 2013
Annals of Sports Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2379-0571
Launched : 2014
JSM Sexual Medicine
ISSN : 2578-3718
Launched : 2016
Annals of Vascular Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2378-9344
Launched : 2014
JSM Biotechnology and Biomedical Engineering
ISSN : 2333-7117
Launched : 2013
Journal of Hematology and Transfusion
ISSN : 2333-6684
Launched : 2013
JSM Environmental Science and Ecology
ISSN : 2333-7141
Launched : 2013
Journal of Cardiology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2333-6676
Launched : 2013
JSM Nanotechnology and Nanomedicine
ISSN : 2334-1815
Launched : 2013
Journal of Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders
ISSN : 2475-9473
Launched : 2016
JSM Ophthalmology
ISSN : 2333-6447
Launched : 2013
Journal of Pharmacology and Clinical Toxicology
ISSN : 2333-7079
Launched : 2013
Annals of Psychiatry and Mental Health
ISSN : 2374-0124
Launched : 2013
Medical Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
ISSN : 2333-6439
Launched : 2013
Annals of Pediatrics and Child Health
ISSN : 2373-9312
Launched : 2013
JSM Clinical Pharmaceutics
ISSN : 2379-9498
Launched : 2014
JSM Foot and Ankle
ISSN : 2475-9112
Launched : 2016
JSM Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementia
ISSN : 2378-9565
Launched : 2014
Journal of Addiction Medicine and Therapy
ISSN : 2333-665X
Launched : 2013
Journal of Veterinary Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2378-931X
Launched : 2013
Annals of Public Health and Research
ISSN : 2378-9328
Launched : 2014
Annals of Orthopedics and Rheumatology
ISSN : 2373-9290
Launched : 2013
Journal of Clinical Nephrology and Research
ISSN : 2379-0652
Launched : 2014
Annals of Community Medicine and Practice
ISSN : 2475-9465
Launched : 2014
Annals of Biometrics and Biostatistics
ISSN : 2374-0116
Launched : 2013
JSM Clinical Case Reports
ISSN : 2373-9819
Launched : 2013
Journal of Cancer Biology and Research
ISSN : 2373-9436
Launched : 2013
Journal of Surgery and Transplantation Science
ISSN : 2379-0911
Launched : 2013
Journal of Dermatology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2373-9371
Launched : 2013
JSM Gastroenterology and Hepatology
ISSN : 2373-9487
Launched : 2013
Annals of Nursing and Practice
ISSN : 2379-9501
Launched : 2014
JSM Dentistry
ISSN : 2333-7133
Launched : 2013
Author Information X