Loading

Late Postoperative Interatrial Block in a Patient Discharged After Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery and the Importance of Atrial Blood Supply. A Case Report and a Short Review

Case Report | Open Access | Volume 9 | Issue 2

  • 1. Gian Andrea Amadei
+ Show More - Show Less
Corresponding Authors
Athanassios Antonopoulos, viale Stradone 9, 48018 Faenza (RA), Italy
Abstract

Interatrial block (IAB), is caused by abnormal conduction over the Bachmann’s bundle and is associated with development of atrial tachyarrhythmias, most commonly atrial fibrillation. It also represents a risk factor for systemic thromboembolic events due to abnormal left atrial contraction. Additionally, delay of post operative P wave duration may, most of the times, induce atrial fibrillation.

Moreover, it is well known that impaired blood supply to the sinus node and Buchman fibers due to pre-existing chronic sinus node artery ischemia may be considered as a risk factor of atrial fibrillation (AF). This case report shows that in a patient with pre-existing impaired sinus node artery blood supply in the preoperative coronary angiogram, one month after coronary bypass surgery may lead to post-operative IAB and atrial fibrillation. We also discuss the importance of atrial blood supply, possible preventive intervention and some considerations regarding anticoagulation treatment initiation.

Keywords

Interatrial block, Atrial fibrillation, Bypass surgery, Anticoagulation therapy, Sinus node artery ischemia

Citation

Antonopoulos A, Amadei GA. Late Postoperative Interatrial Block in a Patient Discharged After Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery and the Importance of Atrial Blood Supply. A Case Report and a Short Review. J Cardiol Clin Res. 2021; 9(2): 1173.

ABBREVIATIONS

IAB: Interatrial Block; AF: Atrial Fibrillation; CABG: Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery; EKG: Electrocardiogram

INTRODUCTION

IAB is caused by conduction delay between the right and left atria (P-wave duration ≥120 ms) and has been found to be associated with development of atrial tachyarrhythmias, most commonly atrial fibrillation (AF). It can represent a risk factor for systemic thromboembolic events due to abnormal left atrial contraction. IAB is caused by abnormal conduction over the Bachmann’s bundle, resulting in a delay of left atrial depolarization [1-5].

AF is a frequent post-operative complication of CABG affecting 25-60% of patients. Some risk factors for post-operative AF include increased age, prolonged clamp time, renal impairment, acute withdrawal of beta blockade and preoperative P wave duration on EKG [6-8]. One factor that these risk factors may have in common is intraoperative atrial ischemia which perhaps leads to variation in atrial refractoriness. The above atrial changes may result in intraatrial conduction abnormalities detectable in P-wave characteristics on surface electrocardiogram (EKG). P-wave duration and P-wave dispersion on standard EKG are non invasive markers of interatrial disturbances, which are believed to be the main electrophysiological cause of AF. Accordingly, a previous study which involved patients in the early post operative phase showed that IAB is not a predictor of post CABG AF [9]. On the contrary, among patients in the late post-operative phase (30 days) a previous study demonstrates that the presence of significant coronary lesion in the arterial supply to the atria and sinus node artery is an independent predictor of AF following CABG [10]. Accordingly, it is well known that impaired blood supply to the sinus node due to pre-existent chronic sinus node artery ischemia may be considered as a risk factor for AF. In this case we show how the persistence of IAB one month after CABG surgery in a patient with pre-existing impaired sinus node artery blood supply in the preoperative coronary angiography may lead to post-operative AF, discuss possible preventive intervention and potential anticoagulation therapy.

CASE PRESENTATION

The patient is a 73-year-old male with a history of coronary artery disease (CAD), with a previous anterior myocardial infarction status 10 years ago. At that time he underwent primary coronary angioplasty with a drug-eluting stent placement on left anterior descending coronary artery. Three months ago he complained of angina and underwent a stress myocardial scintigraphy which demonstrated a large reversible defect involving the antero-septal and inferior wall. Coronary angiography demonstrated an 80% proximal left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis as well as restenosis of the previous stent in the middle part of left anterior descending coronary artery and 90% in the proximal left circumflex and critical ostial lesion involving the right coronary artery (Figure 1).


Figure 1: Ostial right coronary artery stenosis involving the origin of sinus node artery with poor visualization of its distal part due to blood supply impairment.

His left ventricular ejection fraction was approximately 40%. Consequently the patient was scheduled for elective CABG.

His past medical history included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease obesity, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, OSAS and hypothyroidism. The patient subsequently underwent coronary artery bypass graft surgery with a left internal mammary artery to the left anterior descending artery and the obtuse marginal as well as a saphenous vein graft to the distal right coronary artery. On his fourth post-operative day, the patient developed a sustained episode of atrial fibrillation with ventricular rates of 160–180 bpm. The patient was symptomatic with these episodes of atrial fibrillation associated with palpitations and dyspnea, as well as becoming somewhat hypotensive with a systolic blood pressure of 90 – 100 mm Hg. These episodes of atrial fibrillation would self-terminate and then re-initiate abruptly. The patient was initially started on amiodarone at a rate of 1 mg/min without a bolus for at least 6 hours. Due to some concerns about the long-term effects on his lung function as well as the potential hypotension associated with IV amiodarone, therapeutic regimen shifted to metoprolol 5mg i.v. twice a day. His creatinine clearance measured 60mL/ min. Potassium and magnesium levels remained within normal range. The patient was monitored in the ICU. He remained in sinus rhythm throughout the remainder of his hospital stay without any further arrhythmias. He was discharged from hospital on aspirin 100mg, and metoprolol 50mg twice a day.

30 days later, after his discharge, the patient was scheduled for a cardiological control based on our protocol. His examination did not show any particular findings. His EKG was in sinus rhythm, with normal values for PR and QTc segments. But after careful observation of the P wave morphology, duration and voltage in a resting EKG (Figure 2,3),


Figure 2: Resting electrocardiogram at 20 mV amplitude and paper velocity at 25mm/sec is shown. P wave duration is 126ms with a bifid morphology and a small negative terminal part deflection in inferior leads.

Figure 3: Paper velocity of 50mm/sec with 20mV magnification shows better the P wave characteristics

which was magnified at 20mm/mV and 25mm/s paper velocity an interatrial block alteration (bifid P-wave, duration 126ms, and a small negative final deflection in leads II, III, aVF), was revealed. Because IAB may predict AF recurrence, with an increased cardioembolic risk we used a simple electrocardiographic MVP ECG risk score (6) to evaluate the above probability, which showed a score equal do 5 (high probability risk of relapse atrial fibrillation). The above score took into consideration the morphology, voltage and duration of P-wave for the prediction of AF. Moreover, an external event recorder was used to obtain a better patient EKG monitoring. In fact, some AF episodes were recorded (Figure 4).


Figure 4: Atrial fibrillation episodes in external event recorder monitoring is shown

In addition, CHA2DS2VASc score was estimated to confirm the cardioembolic risk. Then, an edoxaban 60mg daily per os was administered.

DISCUSSION

The prevalence of IAB has been shown to increase with age, with only 9% in those less than 35 years of age to 40-60% at age 50 and over [11-13]. On the other hand, IAB has been described as an independent predictor of AF [14]. The incidence of postoperative AF after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery ranges between 20% and 40% [6]. Most of the studies involved patients with post-operative AF regarding the early phase and does not take into consideration the late phase i.e. one month after intervention. Unfortunately, in most of the studies, AF in this phase is considered as a recurrence. On the other hand, an accurate estimation of individual patients’ risk for post operative AF development may facilitate the correct stratification of patients and should be or not treated with preventive strategies. Accordingly, efforts have been made to develop risk prediction models to identify patients most likely to develop post-operative AF. These risk models also imply complex calculations without rapid estimation for targeting patients, which hampers a prompt prophylactic approach, and confounds clinical decision making and patient counselling [15]. Among pre-operative/postoperative signs or factors for developing AF, at least in one study that involved patients in the early post-operative phase, IAB was not confirm as a predictor of AF after CABG surgery [9]. On the contrary, in another prospective study, pre-operative P wave duration ≥105?ms was found to possibly predict the occurrence of post-operative atrial fibrillation [7]. Furthermore, other studies demonstrate that probably a role of atrial ischemia may contribute in the development of AF following CABG surgery [10,16].

Accordingly, experimental and clinical studies have provided strong evidence that atrial ischaemia is the primary stimulus that triggers vulnerability of the patient to develop atrial fibrillation after cardiac operation when cold cardioplegia techniques are used to protect the myocardium [7]. In fact it was hypothesized that intraoperative atrial ischaemia may cause such dispersion of the refractory period and could also act as a trigger for early phase post-operative atrial fibrillation. This hypothesis is supported by the presence of SA and/or AV nodal artery disease (vascular critical stenosis or occlusion) and proposed as the mechanism by which ischemia occurs. Furthermore, whether vascular IAB origin, an important precursor of AF, is associated with early and late phase AF has not been explored

ANATOMY AND PATHOPHYSIOLOGICAL IMPORTANCE OF SINUS NODE ARTERY

The sinus atrial node is located subepicardially in the area of the junction of the right auricle and the superior vena cava termed the sulcus terminalis of the right atrium. The artery that supplies the Sino-Atrial node was a branch of either the right or the left coronary artery. Most frequently (in 63% of cases), the SA node artery was the first anterior atrial branch of the right coronary artery (Figure 1), originating at a distance of 1.2 cm (range 0.2 – 2.2 cm) from the beginning of this vessel [17]. It was usually the largest atrial branch of the right coronary artery; The initial part of the artery (1 – 2 cm), was embedded in the subepicardial adipose tissue. It then traversed the base or floor of the sinus of Theile, coursed through the right atrial wall, behind the aortic bulb and the ascending aorta, and then ascended medially to the anterior interatrial groove. From there it entered the interatrial muscular bundle of Bachman, sometimes anastomosing to Kugel’s artery that presents as an anastomosis arising from the circumflex branch of the left coronary artery with the right coronary artery. The Sinus-Atrial node artery (SNA), divided into two branches: one that ascended to the upper part of the left atrium and the other that went to the junction of the right auricle and superior vena cava, where it entered the sino-atrial node, pierced it and, after leaving the node, then encircled the ostium of the superior vena cava.

 

RISK FACTORS, TIMING FOR POST-CORONARY BYPASS SURGERY IAB EVIDENCE AND ONSET OF ATRIAL FIBRILLATION

Based on our experience a detailed knowledge of the atrial circulation and its anatomy is important for a better understanding of cardiac physiology and for surgical purposes. In fact, cardiac arrhythmias are characteristic clinical features of acute infarcts because of transient ischemia of the sinus node [18]. Moreover, intra-operative atrial ischaemia caused by inadequacy of the preservation of atrial myocardium compared to the ventricular myocardium during the cardiopulmonary bypass, as shown in experimental studies [19], has been proposed as a trigger factor of AF post-CABG. Then, in the early post-operative phase a prolonged aortic cross-clamp time has also been shown to have a high incidence of atrial fibrillation [20, 21]. Furthermore, Saremi F et al. [22], in an imaging study of patients with IAB, using dual CT, described that Bachmann bundle fiber individualization was less visualized in patients with sinus node artery (SNA), blood supply impairment and presence of IAB in EKG. The above finding suggests that disease of bundle of Bachman fibers may play a role in development of atrial arrhythmias. As shown previously, a branch of sinus node artery perfuses the bundle of Bachman in the upper part of the left atrium. Accordingly, a recent angiographic study by Ariyarajah et al. [23], showed that, in patients with IAB and severe coronary artery disease (70% narrowing), the RCA (proximal and mid portions), was the predominant vessel affected, compared with the left coronary artery (58% vs 23%) while Mendes et al., reported that the proximal right coronary artery stenosis was an independent predictor of AF after CABG [16].

On the contrary, in our case an IAB was observed while patient was in the late phase after CABG intervention (30 days). In this patient the sinus node artery originated from the proximal tract of right coronary artery. A critical ostial right coronary artery stenosis which involved the origin of sinus node artery preoperatively was also observed. It is also well known that right-sided grafts are usually connected to the distal right coronary artery or posterior descending artery. So, arterial blood supply to the sinus node artery may not be affected with this type of revascularization technique. According to the previous study of Saremi et al. [22], in this case the distal part of sinus node artery (Figure 1) was less visualized due to the chronic impairment of blood supply. We hypothesised that late IAB presence on EKG one month after CABG, may be due to a persistent Bachman bundle blood supply impairment. Moreover, previous studies reported that patients developing AF after surgery have preoperatively increased intra-atrial conduction times (longer signal-averaged P-wave duration) [24], and more profound atrial structural changes like fibrosis [25,26] compared with patients who maintain sinus rhythm after surgery.

In this post-operative period of time, late IAB observation probably may constitute a pre-existing but permanent AF substrate. Reduced SNA blood supply and atrial remodelling and fibrosis of Bachman bundle may contribute to IAB [27]. It is also well known that patients developing post-operative atrial fibrillation have an eightfold increased risk of developing AF in the future [28]. So, it is important to recognized earlier signs, like IAB or symptoms that may trigger AF. In addition, if only transient factors, which are present in the early phase after CABG, were the only cause of onset of early post-operative AF, AF late after bypass surgery would be expected to be associated with more stable electrical signs, like IAB occurrence at a later phase. This to our opinion emphasizes that electrical signs like IAB are produced by more chronic factors which contribute to several atrial structural abnormalities, as occur in the presence of SNA ischemia.

PREVENTION TREATMENT STRATEGIES OF LATE IAB AND AF POST BYPASS SURGERY

It is well known that hybrid coronary revascularization strategy is safe and effective with similar excellent short- and long-term results, compared with standard CABG. This technique enables the surgeon to provide the surgical benefit conferred by the left internal thoracic artery-to-left anterior descending anastomosis [29,30], while minimizing the invasiveness of revascularization therapy and delivering a complete revascularization with percutaneous intervention to the non-left anterior descending vessels. Additionally, there has been a continuous improvement of drug-eluting stents performance, and percutaneous coronary angioplasty can now provide, in low risk patients and in those with single non-left anterior descending vessel disease, shortand mid-term outcomes comparable to CABG [31]. On the other hand, the right coronary artery stenosis is an independent predictor of AF after coronary artery bypass surgery [16]. In fact, this is associated with 3,7 times more likely post-operative AF in patients with than without right coronary artery stenosis. Additionally, right coronary artery is the most important origin of sinus node and Bachman branch blood supply. Because IAB is considered a premonitory sign for future AF episodes we speculate that percutaneous revascularization of proximal right coronary artery lesions, before the SNA origin, may be a valid alternative option in this type of patients. It is obvious that treatment and mode of surveillance (for early IAB recognition), will influence the number of identified late onset AF. In fact, from another Italian study [32], late AF episodes are a frequent clinical event during the first month after surgery. During this critical period, indeed, 50% of patients taking no prophylactic treatment had events (i.e stroke) and 60% of them had symptoms during the arrhythmia. So, the early recognition of electrical signs like presurgery IAB and a proximal right coronary artery stenotic lesion, before or involving the SNA origin, in the pre-operative coronary angiography, a hybrid revascularization approach may be ideal. Unfortunately, till now, we have no double-blind study which examines this preventive therapeutic approach. On the other hand, late occurrence of IAB needs a further risk stratification to define the importance of oral anticoagulation treatment in this population. CHA2DS2VASc score has been used to classify patients at high risk for thromboembolic events in non-valvular AF. The above was also used to stratify patients at risk with IAB [33]. Accordingly, in our patient, a DOAC therapy was decided.

In conclusion, IAB seems to be an electrical predisposing factor for AF when it is present in the late postoperative phase after bypass surgery. Monitoring this patient with an external recorder identified more paroxysmal AF episodes. In this period, coronary atrial perfusion by the sinus node artery plays an important role to maintain viability of the Bachman bundle and avoid fibers degeneration and fibrosis. Hence, probably a hybrid revascularization technique is needed and this may improve patient prognosis. Additionally, due to this chronic vascular alteration, the presence of IAB is frequently a permanent feature and needs more attention also when anticoagulation therapy must be decided on.

 

REFERENCES

1. Bayés de Luna A, Platonov P, Cosio FG, Cygankiewicz I, Pastore C, Baranowski R, et al. Interatrial blocks. A separate entity from left atrial enlargement: a consensus report. J Electrocardiol. 2012; 45: 445-451.

2. Conde D, Baranchuk A. Interatrial block as anatomical–electrical substrate for supraventricular arrhythmias: Bayes’ syndrome. Arch Mex Cardiol. 2013.

3. Lorbar M, Levrault R, Phadke JG, Spodick DH. Interatrial block as a predictor of embolic stroke. Am J Cardiol. 2005; 95: 667.

4. Bayés de Luna A, Oter MC, Guindo J. Interatrial conduction block with retrograde activation of the left atrium and paroxysmal supraventricular tachyarrhythmias: influence of preventive antiarrhythmic treatment. Int J Cardiol. 1989; 22: 147-150.

5. Agarwal YK, Aronow WS, Levy JA, Spodick DH. Association of interatrial block with the development of atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol. 2003; 91: 882.

6. Lin MH, Kamel H, Singer DE. Perioperative/Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation and Risk of Subsequent Stroke and/or Mortality. Stroke. 2019; 50: 1364-1371.

7. Wu F, Wu Y, Tao W, Zhao H, Shen D. Preoperative P-wave duration as a predictor of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting: A prospective cohort study with meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Sci. 2018; 5: 151-156.

8. Lowe JE, Hendry PJ, Hendrickson SC. Intra-operative identification of cardiac patients at risk to develop post operative atrial fibrillation. Ann Surg. 1991; 213: 388-391.

9. Conde D, Van Oosten EM, Hamilton A, Petsikas D, Payne D, Redfearn DP, et al. Prevalence of interatrial block in patients undergoing coronary bypass graft surgery. Intern J Cardiol. 2014; 171: e98-e99.

10. Kolvekar S, D’Souza A, Akhtar P, Reek C, Garratt C, Spy T. Role of atrial ischaemia in development of atrial fibrillation following coronary artery bypass surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1997; 11: 70-75.

11. Asad N, Spodick DH. Prevalence of Interatrial block in a general hospital population. Am J Cardiol. 2003; 91: 609-610.

12. Jairath UC, Spodick DH. Exceptional prevalence of interatrial block in a general hospital population. Clin Cardiol. 2001; 142: 823-827.

13. Ariyarajah V, Asad N, Tander A, Spodick DH. Interatrial block: Pandemic prevalence. significance and diagnosis. Chest. 2005; 128: 970-975.

14. Baranchuk A, Enriquez A, Antiperovitch P, Alexander B, Çinier G. Advanced interatrial block as a key marker for atrial fibrillation recurrence: Bayés’ syndrome. J Geriatr Cardiol. 2017; 14: 169-173.

15. Zaman AG, Archbold A, Helft G, Paul EA, Curzen NP, Mills PG. Atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a model for preoperative stratification. Circulation. 2000; 101: 1403-1408.

16. Mendes LA, Connely GP, McKenny PA, Podrid PJ, Cupples A, Shemin RJ, et al. Right coronary artery stenosis: An indipendent predictor of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery. JACC. 1995: 25; 198-202.

17. Pejkovic B, Kranic I, Anderhuber F, Kosutic D. Anatomical Aspects of the Arterial Blood Supply to the Sinoatrial and Atrioventricular Nodes of the Human Heart. J Int Med Res. 2008; 36: 691-698.

18. Kyriakidis M, Barbetseas J, Antonopoulos A, Skouros C, Tentolouris C, Toutouzas P. Early Atrial Arrhythmias in Acute Myocardial Infarction: Role of the Sinus Node Artery. Chest. 1992; 101: 944-947.

19. Smith PK, Buhrman WC, Levett JM, Ferguson Jr TB, Holman WL, Cox JL. Supraventricular conduction abnormalities following cardiac operations: a complication of inadequate atrial preservation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1983; 85: 105-115.

20. Caretta Q, Mercanti CA, De Nardo D. Ventricular conduction defects and atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting. Multivariate analysis of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative variables. Eur Heart J. 1991; 12: 1107-1111.

21. Fuller JA, Adams GG, Buxton B. Atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1989; 97: 821-825.

22. Saremi F, Channual S, Krishnan S, Gurudevan SV, Narula J, Abolhoda A. Bachmann Bundle and Its Arterial Supply: Imaging with Multidetector CT-Implications for Interatrial Conduction Abnormalities and Arrhythmias. Radiology. 2008; 248: 447-457.

23. Ariyarajah V, Fernandes J, Apiyasawat S, Spodick DH. Angiographic localization of potential culprit coronary arteries in patients with interatrial block following a positive exercise tolerance test. Am J Cardiol. 2007; 99: 58-61.

24. Steinberg JS, Zelenkofske S, Wong SC, Gelernt M, Sciacca R, Menchavez E. Value of the P-wave signal-averaged ECG for predicting atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. Circulation. 1993; 88: 2618-2622.

25. Swartz MF, Fink GW, Lutz CJ, Taffet SM, Berenfeld O, Vikstrom KL, et al. Left versus right atrial difference in dominant frequency, K(+) channel transcripts, and fibrosis in patients developing atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. Heart Rhythm. 2009; 6: 1415-1422.

26. Goette A, Juenemann G, Peters B, Klein HU, Roessner A, Huth C, et al. Determinants and consequences of atrial fibrosis in patients undergoing open heart surgery. Cardiovasc Res. 2002; 54: 390-396.

27. Benito EM, De Luna AB, Baranchuk A, Mont L. Extensive atrial fibrosis assessed by late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance associated with advanced interatrial block electrocardiogram pattern. Europace. 2017; 19: 377.

28. Ahlsson A, Fengsrud E, Bodin L, Englund A. Postoperative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing aortocoronary bypass surgery carries an eightfold risk of future atrial fibrillation and a doubled cardiovascular mortality. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010; 37: 1353- 1359.

29. Dalyanoglu H, Mehdiani A, Minol JP, Sipahi NF, Aubin H, Boeken U, et al. Conversion of atrial fibrillation after cardiosurgical procedures by vernakalant® as an atrial repolarization delaying agent (ARDA). Heart Surg Forum. 2018; 21: E201-e208.

30. Almassi GH, Pesci SA, Collins JF, Shroyer AL, Zenati MA, Grover FL. Predictors and impact of post-operative atrial fibrillation on patients’ outcomes: a report from the Randomized on Versus Off bypass trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012; 143: 93-102.

31. Hage A, Giambruno V, Jones P, Chu MW, Fox S, Teefy P, et al. Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Versus Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Comparative Effectiveness Analysis With LongTerm Follow-up. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019; 8: e014204.

32. Cioffi G, Cemin C, Russo TE, Pellegrini A, Terrasi F, Ferrario G. Postdischarge recurrences of new-onset atrial fibrillation following cardiac surgery: impact of low-dose amiodarone and beta-blocker prophylaxis. Ital Heart J. 2000; 1: 691-697.

33. Wu JT, Wang SL, Chu YJ, Long DY, Dong JZ, Fan XW, et al. CHADS2 and CHA2DS2VASc scores predict the risk of ischemic stroke outcome in patients with interatrial block without atrial fibrillation. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2017; 24: 176-184

Antonopoulos A, Amadei GA. Late Postoperative Interatrial Block in a Patient Discharged After Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery and the Importance of Atrial Blood Supply. A Case Report and a Short Review. J Cardiol Clin Res. 2021; 9(2): 1173.

Received : 04 Aug 2021
Accepted : 25 Aug 2021
Published : 28 Aug 2021
Journals
Annals of Otolaryngology and Rhinology
ISSN : 2379-948X
Launched : 2014
JSM Schizophrenia
Launched : 2016
Journal of Nausea
Launched : 2020
JSM Internal Medicine
Launched : 2016
JSM Hepatitis
Launched : 2016
JSM Oro Facial Surgeries
ISSN : 2578-3211
Launched : 2016
Journal of Human Nutrition and Food Science
ISSN : 2333-6706
Launched : 2013
JSM Regenerative Medicine and Bioengineering
ISSN : 2379-0490
Launched : 2013
JSM Spine
ISSN : 2578-3181
Launched : 2016
Archives of Palliative Care
ISSN : 2573-1165
Launched : 2016
JSM Nutritional Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3203
Launched : 2017
Annals of Neurodegenerative Disorders
ISSN : 2476-2032
Launched : 2016
Journal of Fever
ISSN : 2641-7782
Launched : 2017
JSM Bone Marrow Research
ISSN : 2578-3351
Launched : 2016
JSM Mathematics and Statistics
ISSN : 2578-3173
Launched : 2014
Journal of Autoimmunity and Research
ISSN : 2573-1173
Launched : 2014
JSM Arthritis
ISSN : 2475-9155
Launched : 2016
JSM Head and Neck Cancer-Cases and Reviews
ISSN : 2573-1610
Launched : 2016
JSM General Surgery Cases and Images
ISSN : 2573-1564
Launched : 2016
JSM Anatomy and Physiology
ISSN : 2573-1262
Launched : 2016
JSM Dental Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1548
Launched : 2016
Annals of Emergency Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1017
Launched : 2016
Annals of Mens Health and Wellness
ISSN : 2641-7707
Launched : 2017
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Health Care
ISSN : 2576-0084
Launched : 2018
Journal of Chronic Diseases and Management
ISSN : 2573-1300
Launched : 2016
Annals of Vaccines and Immunization
ISSN : 2378-9379
Launched : 2014
JSM Heart Surgery Cases and Images
ISSN : 2578-3157
Launched : 2016
Annals of Reproductive Medicine and Treatment
ISSN : 2573-1092
Launched : 2016
JSM Brain Science
ISSN : 2573-1289
Launched : 2016
JSM Biomarkers
ISSN : 2578-3815
Launched : 2014
JSM Biology
ISSN : 2475-9392
Launched : 2016
Archives of Stem Cell and Research
ISSN : 2578-3580
Launched : 2014
Annals of Clinical and Medical Microbiology
ISSN : 2578-3629
Launched : 2014
JSM Pediatric Surgery
ISSN : 2578-3149
Launched : 2017
Journal of Memory Disorder and Rehabilitation
ISSN : 2578-319X
Launched : 2016
JSM Tropical Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2578-3165
Launched : 2016
JSM Head and Face Medicine
ISSN : 2578-3793
Launched : 2016
JSM Cardiothoracic Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1297
Launched : 2016
JSM Bone and Joint Diseases
ISSN : 2578-3351
Launched : 2017
JSM Bioavailability and Bioequivalence
ISSN : 2641-7812
Launched : 2017
JSM Atherosclerosis
ISSN : 2573-1270
Launched : 2016
Journal of Genitourinary Disorders
ISSN : 2641-7790
Launched : 2017
Journal of Fractures and Sprains
ISSN : 2578-3831
Launched : 2016
Journal of Autism and Epilepsy
ISSN : 2641-7774
Launched : 2016
Annals of Marine Biology and Research
ISSN : 2573-105X
Launched : 2014
JSM Health Education & Primary Health Care
ISSN : 2578-3777
Launched : 2016
JSM Communication Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3807
Launched : 2016
Annals of Musculoskeletal Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3599
Launched : 2016
Annals of Virology and Research
ISSN : 2573-1122
Launched : 2014
JSM Renal Medicine
ISSN : 2573-1637
Launched : 2016
Journal of Muscle Health
ISSN : 2578-3823
Launched : 2016
JSM Genetics and Genomics
ISSN : 2334-1823
Launched : 2013
JSM Anxiety and Depression
ISSN : 2475-9139
Launched : 2016
Clinical Journal of Heart Diseases
ISSN : 2641-7766
Launched : 2016
Annals of Medicinal Chemistry and Research
ISSN : 2378-9336
Launched : 2014
JSM Pain and Management
ISSN : 2578-3378
Launched : 2016
JSM Women's Health
ISSN : 2578-3696
Launched : 2016
Clinical Research in HIV or AIDS
ISSN : 2374-0094
Launched : 2013
Journal of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Obesity
ISSN : 2333-6692
Launched : 2013
Journal of Substance Abuse and Alcoholism
ISSN : 2373-9363
Launched : 2013
JSM Neurosurgery and Spine
ISSN : 2373-9479
Launched : 2013
Journal of Liver and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2379-0830
Launched : 2014
Journal of Drug Design and Research
ISSN : 2379-089X
Launched : 2014
JSM Clinical Oncology and Research
ISSN : 2373-938X
Launched : 2013
JSM Bioinformatics, Genomics and Proteomics
ISSN : 2576-1102
Launched : 2014
JSM Chemistry
ISSN : 2334-1831
Launched : 2013
Journal of Trauma and Care
ISSN : 2573-1246
Launched : 2014
JSM Surgical Oncology and Research
ISSN : 2578-3688
Launched : 2016
Annals of Food Processing and Preservation
ISSN : 2573-1033
Launched : 2016
Journal of Radiology and Radiation Therapy
ISSN : 2333-7095
Launched : 2013
JSM Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
ISSN : 2578-3572
Launched : 2016
Annals of Clinical Pathology
ISSN : 2373-9282
Launched : 2013
Annals of Cardiovascular Diseases
ISSN : 2641-7731
Launched : 2016
Journal of Behavior
ISSN : 2576-0076
Launched : 2016
Annals of Clinical and Experimental Metabolism
ISSN : 2572-2492
Launched : 2016
Clinical Research in Infectious Diseases
ISSN : 2379-0636
Launched : 2013
JSM Microbiology
ISSN : 2333-6455
Launched : 2013
Journal of Urology and Research
ISSN : 2379-951X
Launched : 2014
Journal of Family Medicine and Community Health
ISSN : 2379-0547
Launched : 2013
Annals of Pregnancy and Care
ISSN : 2578-336X
Launched : 2017
JSM Cell and Developmental Biology
ISSN : 2379-061X
Launched : 2013
Annals of Aquaculture and Research
ISSN : 2379-0881
Launched : 2014
Clinical Research in Pulmonology
ISSN : 2333-6625
Launched : 2013
Journal of Immunology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2333-6714
Launched : 2013
Annals of Forensic Research and Analysis
ISSN : 2378-9476
Launched : 2014
JSM Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
ISSN : 2333-7109
Launched : 2013
Annals of Breast Cancer Research
ISSN : 2641-7685
Launched : 2016
Annals of Gerontology and Geriatric Research
ISSN : 2378-9409
Launched : 2014
Journal of Sleep Medicine and Disorders
ISSN : 2379-0822
Launched : 2014
JSM Burns and Trauma
ISSN : 2475-9406
Launched : 2016
Chemical Engineering and Process Techniques
ISSN : 2333-6633
Launched : 2013
Annals of Clinical Cytology and Pathology
ISSN : 2475-9430
Launched : 2014
JSM Allergy and Asthma
ISSN : 2573-1254
Launched : 2016
Journal of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
ISSN : 2334-2307
Launched : 2013
Annals of Sports Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2379-0571
Launched : 2014
JSM Sexual Medicine
ISSN : 2578-3718
Launched : 2016
Annals of Vascular Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2378-9344
Launched : 2014
JSM Biotechnology and Biomedical Engineering
ISSN : 2333-7117
Launched : 2013
Journal of Hematology and Transfusion
ISSN : 2333-6684
Launched : 2013
JSM Environmental Science and Ecology
ISSN : 2333-7141
Launched : 2013
Journal of Cardiology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2333-6676
Launched : 2013
JSM Nanotechnology and Nanomedicine
ISSN : 2334-1815
Launched : 2013
Journal of Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders
ISSN : 2475-9473
Launched : 2016
JSM Ophthalmology
ISSN : 2333-6447
Launched : 2013
Journal of Pharmacology and Clinical Toxicology
ISSN : 2333-7079
Launched : 2013
Annals of Psychiatry and Mental Health
ISSN : 2374-0124
Launched : 2013
Medical Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
ISSN : 2333-6439
Launched : 2013
Annals of Pediatrics and Child Health
ISSN : 2373-9312
Launched : 2013
JSM Clinical Pharmaceutics
ISSN : 2379-9498
Launched : 2014
JSM Foot and Ankle
ISSN : 2475-9112
Launched : 2016
JSM Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementia
ISSN : 2378-9565
Launched : 2014
Journal of Addiction Medicine and Therapy
ISSN : 2333-665X
Launched : 2013
Journal of Veterinary Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2378-931X
Launched : 2013
Annals of Public Health and Research
ISSN : 2378-9328
Launched : 2014
Annals of Orthopedics and Rheumatology
ISSN : 2373-9290
Launched : 2013
Journal of Clinical Nephrology and Research
ISSN : 2379-0652
Launched : 2014
Annals of Community Medicine and Practice
ISSN : 2475-9465
Launched : 2014
Annals of Biometrics and Biostatistics
ISSN : 2374-0116
Launched : 2013
JSM Clinical Case Reports
ISSN : 2373-9819
Launched : 2013
Journal of Cancer Biology and Research
ISSN : 2373-9436
Launched : 2013
Journal of Surgery and Transplantation Science
ISSN : 2379-0911
Launched : 2013
Journal of Dermatology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2373-9371
Launched : 2013
JSM Gastroenterology and Hepatology
ISSN : 2373-9487
Launched : 2013
Annals of Nursing and Practice
ISSN : 2379-9501
Launched : 2014
JSM Dentistry
ISSN : 2333-7133
Launched : 2013
Author Information X