Loading

Journal of Immunology and Clinical Research

Breakthrough Infection Influenced SARS-CoV-2 IgG Antibody Titer in a Group of Healthcare Providers

Original Research | Open Access | Volume 8 | Issue 1

  • 1. BADAS COVID-19 and Molecular Diagnostic Lab, Mirpur, Bangladesh
  • 2. Department of Immunology, Bangladesh University of Health Sciences, Bangladesh
  • 3. Department of Physiology and Molecular Biology, Bangladesh University of Health Sciences, Bangladesh
+ Show More - Show Less
Corresponding Authors
Rosy Sultana, Professor and Head Department of Immunology, Bangladesh University of Health Sciences, 125/1, Darus Salam Road, Mirpur, Dhaka-1216, Bangladesh
Abstract

Background: The phenomenon of breakthrough infection during the COVID-19 pandemic has raised concerns regarding the efficacy of the vaccinations and healthcare providers are exposed to instances on a regular basis for professional reasons, putting them at risk. This study was aimed to look into the SARS-CoV-2 IgG status among the healthcare providers, reported with breakthrough infections.

Methods: The study involved 78 healthcare providers (e.g., doctors, nurses, Lab personnel, support staffs) from a tertiary care hospital in Dhaka city. Blood samples were collected from participants who had received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine, regardless of the incidence of breakthrough infection. SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody level was estimated using an Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA).

Result: Out of the 78 participants, 31 had experienced breakthrough infection. The mean (±SD) SARS-CoV-2 specific IgG antibody level was 13.42±10.68×104 BAU/ mL. SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody levels of the infected subjects were significantly higher than those without breakthrough infections (p=0.024). The highest IgG levels was observed in participants who received three vaccine doses (15.71±11.36×104 BAU/mL), followed by two doses (9.48±8.09×104 BAU/mL) and one dose (5.91±2.27×104 BAU/mL). Participants who experienced breakthrough infections after receiving the third dose demonstrated significantly higher IgG levels (p=0.035).

Conclusion: Healthcare providers studied demonstrated substantial number of participants developing breakthrough infection and those had significantly higher level of endpoint SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody. A dose dependent antibody response following vaccination could not be excluded.

KEYWORDS
  • COVID-19 vaccine
  • Healthcare Professionals
  • ELISA
  • Breakthrough infection
  • SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody
CITATION

Haque A, Mahbub C, Hossain B, Tasnim S, Saiedullah M, et al. (2025) Breakthrough Infection Influenced SARS-CoV-2 IgG Antibody Titer in a Group of Healthcare Providers. J Immunol Clin Res 8(1): 1051.

ABBREVIATIONS

BAU: Binding Antibody Unit; BMI: Body Mass Index; CDC: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; COVID-19: Coronavirus Disease-19; ELISA: Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay; IgG: Immunoglobulin G; PPE: Personal Protective Equipment; RT-PCR: Reverse- transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction; SARS-CoV-2: Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2; WHO: World Health Organization

INTRODUCTION

COVID-19 evolved into a pandemic phenomenon staggeringly fast and put the world to a standstill by the sixth month of the first reported case in China [1,2]. Hospitals and healthcare facilities experienced unprecedented situation to tackle ailing cases which incurred the risk of affecting the healthcare providers. By April 2020, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported that healthcare providers faced a significantly elevated risk of COVID-19 infection, accounting for 11% of all confirmed cases in states [3].

The rate of COVID-19 infection dropped with an understanding the route of transmission of the novel SARS-CoV-2 “COVID-19” virus and implementation of social distancing, frequent hand washing, wearing mask and personal protective equipment (PPE) [4,5] and by December 2020, the introduction of vaccine started to exhibit gradual decline in number of COVID-19 cases [6]. COVID-19 antibodies (IgG) following vaccination against the SARS-CoV-2 virus were initially found to persist relatively longer than those developed after natural infection [7]. By April 2021, report surfaced about breakthrough COVID-19 infections, an infection by SARS-CoV-2 virus even after vaccination [8]. Clinical manifestations of SARS-CoV-2 infection and confirmation of COVID-19 infection by the reverse transcription – polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) within 14 or more days after receipt of two doses of the COVID-19 vaccine has been defined by World Health Organization (WHO) as breakthrough infection [9]. It was postulated that gradual decline of specific and neutralizing antibodies, and/or insufficient immunogenic response, though not confirmed by otherwise, could be associated with the incidence of breakthrough infection [10]. The rate of breakthrough infection found to vary not only in populations but in terms of gender and profession [11].

The Bangladesh Institute of Health Sciences (BIHS) General Hospital, like many other hospitals in Bangladesh, was overwhelmed by the healthcare seekers during the COVID-19 pandemic incurring the risk of contracting the disease. Reports about the rate of breakthrough infection affecting healthcare providers are lacking in Bangladesh. The present study was conducted to look into the rate of breakthrough infections and measure the endpoint COVID-19 IgG level in a group of healthcare provider.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This cross-sectional study included of 78 healthcare providers: doctors (15%), nurses (17%), lab personnel (44%) and support staffs (24%) of BIHS General Hospital; Dhaka with age ranging between 20-60 years. Individuals with no history of co-morbidities and have had received at least one dose of COVID-19 vaccine, regardless of the incidence of breakthrough infection were included in this study.

The participants were briefed about the purpose, nature and risk of the study. Under aseptic precaution, 5.0 ml of blood sample was collected from each participant after receiving a written informed consent from the participants. SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies were measured by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Kit used: DRG ELISA kit, Marburg, Germany), which specifically detects IgG antibodies against the recombinant Receptor-Binding Domain (RBD) of the Spike Protein S1. Serum samples were diluted 1:800, and 100µL of each standard, control, and pre-diluted sample was added to the microtiter wells. Initially, the wells were incubated at 37°C for 60 minutes (iEMS incubator shaker, Finland). Next, they were washed three times with diluted wash solution, and 100µL of enzyme conjugate was added in each well, followed by 30-minute incubation at room temperature. After another wash step, 100µL of substrate solution was added in each well, incubated for 15 minutes, and the reaction was terminated by adding 50µL of stop solution in each well. The optical density was taken at 450 nm (reference wavelength of 620 nm - 630 nm) in a micro- plate reader (Multiskan FC, China). The IgG antibody levels of the samples exceeded the kit recommended cut-off value of 50 BAU/mL were considered positive.

Data expressed as mean±SD, number (percent) as appropriate. Student’s unpaired ‘t’ test was carried out to calculate statistical difference for numerical data. p-value <0.05 was taken as level of significance. The ethical approval for the study was obtained from the Ethical Review Committee of Bangladesh University of Health Sciences (Memo no: BUHS/ERC/EA22/346).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Gender, age and BMI of the subjects

Distribution of the Male (46%) and female (54%) subjects in this study did not show any statistical difference. Of the total subjects, 50% were at age group ≤ 30 years, and 40% between 31-50 years and the rest 10% were >50 years (Table 1). Mean body mass index (BMI) was 24.11±3.22, 33% participants had BMI less than 23 kg/m2, 32% between 23.1 and 24.9 kg/m2, and 35% greater than 25 kg/m2 (Table 1).

Table 1: Characteristics of the study subjects

Variable

Number (%)

Mean±SD [Range]

Gender

 

 

Male

36 (46%)

Female

42 (54%)

BMI categories (Kg/m2)

 

 

Less than 23

26 (33%)

24.11±3.22 [16.20-

Between 23.1 and 24.9

25 (32%)

33.90]

Greater than 25

27 (35%)

 

History of breakthrough

 

 

infection

 

Yes

31 (40%)

No

47 (60%)

SARS-CoV-2 vaccination

 

 

1 Dose

03 (4%)

2 Doses

24 (31%)

3 Doses

51 (65%)

Results were expressed as number (percentage)/ mean±SD and range (Minimum- Maximum) as appropriate.

SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody level

SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody (mean±SD, BAU/mL) levels among the participants who received different doses of COVID-19 vaccine were showed in Figure 1. Participants who received three doses of the vaccine had a significantly higher SARS-CoV-2 IgG level (15.71±11.36×104) compared to those who received two doses (9.48±8.09×104) and one dose (5.91±2.27×104) (p=0.460) (Figure 1).

Figure 1 SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody level on the basis of receipt of COVID-19 vaccine doses. Statistical difference was calculated by using student’s unpaired ‘t’ test. A p<0.05 was taken as level of significance

Figure 1: SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody level on the basis of receipt of COVID-19 vaccine doses. Statistical difference was calculated by using student’s unpaired ‘t’ test. A p<0.05 was taken as level of significance

Participants with a history of breakthrough infection had significantly higher SARS-CoV-2 IgG levels (17.08±13.26×104) compared to those with no breakthrough infection (11.01±7.82×104) (p=0.024) (Figure 2).

Figure 2 SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody level with the incidence of breakthrough infection. Statistical difference was calculated by using student’s unpaired ‘t’ test. A p<0.05 was taken as level of significance.

Figure 2: SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody level with the incidence of breakthrough infection. Statistical difference was calculated by using student’s unpaired ‘t’ test. A p<0.05 was taken as level of significance.

SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody level of the participants with incidence of breakthrough infections after receiving 3rd dose of vaccination

Participants who experienced breakthrough infections after the third dose of COVID-19 vaccination had a significantly higher mean IgG antibody level (24.06±14.14×104) compared to those without breakthrough infections (13.42±9.44×104) (p=0.035) (Table 2).

Table 2: SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody level of the participants with incidence of breakthrough infections after 3rd dose of vaccination

Breakthrough infection after receiving 3rd dose

SARS-CoV-2 IgG (BAU×104) BAU/mL

t/p value

Yes (11)

24.06±14.14

2.357/0.035

No (40)

13.42±9.44

Results were expressed as mean±SD. Statistical difference was calculated by using Student’s unpaired ‘t’ test. A p value <0.05 was considered as a level of significance.

SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody and BMI level

SARS-CoV-2  IgG  antibody  levels  in  participants with  normal,  overweight,  and  obese  group  were 11.51±9.003×104, 11.94±7.90×104, and 16.63±13.62×104, respectively. The mean (±SD) IgG levels were not statistically significant (p=0.153).

DISCUSSION

In the event of COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare facilities became overwhelmed with the affected cases. Putting the healthcare providers at significant risk of contracting COVID-19 led to number of fatalities among doctors, nurses, and staff globally [12]. Post-vaccination antibody profiles were assessed by different groups for evaluation of the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines [13-15]. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody detected in COVID-19 vaccine recipients reported to decline quickly leading to almost below the detection limit after six months of vaccination. This immunodeficient status led to breakthrough infection by SARS-CoV-2 virus, which suggests the importance of evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 IgG responses among healthcare providers in order to develop an appropriate strategic approach in preventive measures for the vulnerable [16].

It has been suggested that vaccine effectiveness is influenced by the number of doses administered [17]. It was demonstrated that sero-positivity rates of 40%, 65%, and 91% for those received one, two, and three doses of the vaccine respectively. The present study demonstrated that those received three doses had significantly higher mean value of IgG compared to those received two doses (Figure 1). It is important to note that only 4% received one dose of vaccine. Although mean IgG of this group was low but did not show statistical significance.

The presence of elevated levels of SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies does not necessarily signify their functional importance in conferring immune protection. The present study demonstrated that the breakthrough infection rate among all subjects was 40%, which is notably higher compared to other studies. A study found that 10% of the participants had a history of breakthrough infection [18]. One possible reason for the increased breakthrough infection rate could be the profession of this study group, which included 44% lab personnel, thereby having a higher risk of contracting infection. Additionally, the waning of IgG titer over time might also contribute to the higher infection rate [18].

In addition to assessing the rate of breakthrough infections, we also compared the SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody levels of the participants. Those with breakthrough infections demonstrated higher SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody levels compared to those without breakthrough infections (p= 0.024) (Figure 2). This increased SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody levels among individuals with breakthrough infections might be for immunologic memory, possibly due to synergistic effect of vaccine induced immunity (non-neutralizing antibody unable to protect individuals from infection) and later exposure to the SARS-CoV-2 virus causing stimulation of immune reactive cells for antibody production, resulting development of a more robust immune response [19]. However, neutralizing effects of the antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 virus have not been verified in this study.

SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody level was found to be higher in those with breakthrough infection after 3rd dose of vaccination (Table 2). Greaney et al., previously suspected that B cells, which produce antibodies, increase following each exposure, regardless of infection or vaccination. As a result, vaccinated people who had been infected with the virus had higher levels of IgG antibodies [20]. This may have generated the circumstance in which those who experienced a breakthrough infection had greater IgG levels.

CONCLUSION

The study demonstrated a pronounced IgG immune response against SARS-CoV-2 after the third vaccination, when compared to relatively low mean IgG levels among those who received two-dose vaccines. COVID-19 breakthrough infections elicited a higher immune response, as supported by significantly higher IgG levels compared to those without breakthrough infections. The sample size was relatively small, limiting the statistical power. The lack of follow-up on IgG levels limits understanding of seroconversion dynamics in individuals. This study suggests further investigation with a larger sample size under a follow-up study in a specific time interval to determine the persistence of SARS-CoV-2 IgG level in individuals with or without history of Breakthrough infection. Given the robust seropositivity observed, future studies should also include cross-reactivity testing of samples.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors express their gratitude to the Ministry of Science & Technology, Government of Bangladesh, for supporting this study through a research grant. Additionally, Bangladesh University of Health Sciences provided supplementary support, which is greatly appreciated.

AH was responsible for drafting and designing the manuscript. AH and CM jointly contributed to data collection and participant recruitment. BH was involved in collection of data and management of specimens. ST contributed to the management and statistical analysis of the data. MS supervised laboratory analysis and quality control. ZH was responsible for data interpretation, study conception, and manuscript editing. RS provided overall supervision, developed the core ideas, and led the preparation of the manuscript. All authors contributed significantly to the study and approved the final version of the manuscript.

REFERENCES
  1. Wu YC, Chen CS, Chan YJ. The outbreak of COVID-19: An overview. J Chinese Med Assoc. 2020; 83: 217-220.
  2. Whitworth J. COVID-19: a fast evolving pandemic. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 2020; 114: 241-248.
  3. Gross JV, Mohren J, Erren TC. COVID-19 and healthcare workers: a rapid systematic review into risks and preventive measures. BMJ Open. 2021; 11: e042270.
  4. Delikhoon M, Guzman MI, Nabizadeh R, Norouzian Baghani A. Modes of transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) and factors influencing on the airborne transmission: A review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18: 395.
  5. Wong EL, Ho KF, Dong D, Cheung AW, Yau PS, Chan EY, et al. Compliance with standard precautions and its relationship with views on infection control and prevention policy among healthcare workers during COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18: 3420.
  6. Rossman H, Shilo S, Meir T, Gorfine M, Shalit U, Segal E. COVID-19 dynamics after a national immunization program in Israel. Nat Med. 2021; 27: 1055-1061.
  7. Altawalah H. Antibody responses to natural SARS-CoV-2 infection or after COVID-19 vaccination. Vaccines. 2021; 9: 910.
  8. Bergwerk M, Gonen T, Lustig Y, Amit S, Lipsitch M, Cohen C, et al. Covid-19 breakthrough infections in vaccinated health care workers. NEJM. 2021; 385: 1474-1484.
  9. World Health Organization. Vaccine efficacy, effectiveness and protection. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021
  10. Seaman MS, Siedner MJ, Boucau J, Lavine CL, Ghantous F, Liew MY, et al. Vaccine breakthrough infection leads to distinct profiles of neutralizing antibody responses by SARS-CoV-2 variant. JCI insight. 2022; 7: e159944.
  11. Uzun G, Bareiß A, Becker M, Althaus K, Dulovic A, Junker D, et al. Characteristics Associated with COVID-19 Breakthrough Infections after Booster Vaccinations in Healthcare Workers: Insights from the TüSeRe: exact Study. J Clin Med. 2024; 13: 1571.
  12. Iyengar KP, Ish P, Upadhyaya GK, Malhotra N, Vaishya R, Jain VK. COVID-19 and mortality in doctors. Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clin Res Rev. 2020; 14: 1743-1746.
  13. Lopera TJ, Chvatal-Medina M, Flórez-Álvarez L, Zapata-Cardona MI, Taborda NA, Rugeles MT, et al. Humoral response to BNT162b2 vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 variants decays after six months. Front Immunol. 2022; 13: 879036.
  14. Stouten V, Hubin P, Haarhuis F, van Loenhout JA, Billuart M, Brondeel R, et al. Incidence and risk factors of COVID-19 vaccine breakthrough infections: a prospective cohort study in Belgium. Viruses. 2022; 14: 802.
  15. Yang ZR, Jiang YW, Li FX, Liu D, Lin TF, Zhao ZY, et al. Efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and the dose–response relationship with three major antibodies: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. The Lancet Microbe. 2023; 4: e236-e246.
  16. Levin EG, Lustig Y, Cohen C, Fluss R, Indenbaum V, Amit S, et al. Waning immune humoral response to BNT162b2 Covid-19 vaccine over 6 months. NEJM. 2021; 385: e84.
  17. Sritipsukho P, Khawcharoenporn T, Siribumrungwong B, Damronglerd P, Suwantarat N, Satdhabudha A, et al. comparing real- life effectiveness of various COVID-19 vaccine regimens during the delta variant-dominant pandemic: a test-negative case-control study. Emerging Microbes Infections. 2022; 11: 585-592.
  18. Ko GY, Lee J, Bae H, Ryu JH, Park HS, Kang H, et al. Longitudinal Analysis of SARS-CoV-2-Specific Cellular and Humoral Immune Responses and Breakthrough Infection following BNT162b2/BNT162b2/BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1/ChAdOx1/BNT162b2 Vaccination: A Prospective Cohort in Naive Healthcare Workers. Vaccines. 2023; 11: 1613.
  19. Owsianka I, Pac A, Jachowicz E, Gutkowska K, Szczuci?ski W, Maziarz B, et al. SARS-CoV-2 antibody response after mRNA vaccination in healthcare workers with and without previous COVID-19, a follow- up study from the University Hospital in Krakow, Poland. Front Immunol. 2023; 13:1071204.
  20. Greaney AJ, Starr TN, Gilchuk P, Zost SJ, Binshtein E, Loes AN, et al. Complete mapping of mutations to the SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor- binding domain that escape antibody recognition. Cell Host Microbe. 2021; 29: 44-57.

Haque A, Mahbub C, Hossain B, Tasnim S, Saiedullah M, et al. (2025) Breakthrough Infection Influenced SARS-CoV-2 IgG Antibody Titer in a Group of Healthcare Providers. J Immunol Clin Res 8(1): 1051.

Received : 07 Jan 2025
Accepted : 04 Feb 2025
Published : 07 Feb 2025
Journals
Annals of Otolaryngology and Rhinology
ISSN : 2379-948X
Launched : 2014
JSM Schizophrenia
Launched : 2016
Journal of Nausea
Launched : 2020
JSM Internal Medicine
Launched : 2016
JSM Hepatitis
Launched : 2016
JSM Oro Facial Surgeries
ISSN : 2578-3211
Launched : 2016
Journal of Human Nutrition and Food Science
ISSN : 2333-6706
Launched : 2013
JSM Regenerative Medicine and Bioengineering
ISSN : 2379-0490
Launched : 2013
JSM Spine
ISSN : 2578-3181
Launched : 2016
Archives of Palliative Care
ISSN : 2573-1165
Launched : 2016
JSM Nutritional Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3203
Launched : 2017
Annals of Neurodegenerative Disorders
ISSN : 2476-2032
Launched : 2016
Journal of Fever
ISSN : 2641-7782
Launched : 2017
JSM Bone Marrow Research
ISSN : 2578-3351
Launched : 2016
JSM Mathematics and Statistics
ISSN : 2578-3173
Launched : 2014
Journal of Autoimmunity and Research
ISSN : 2573-1173
Launched : 2014
JSM Arthritis
ISSN : 2475-9155
Launched : 2016
JSM Head and Neck Cancer-Cases and Reviews
ISSN : 2573-1610
Launched : 2016
JSM General Surgery Cases and Images
ISSN : 2573-1564
Launched : 2016
JSM Anatomy and Physiology
ISSN : 2573-1262
Launched : 2016
JSM Dental Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1548
Launched : 2016
Annals of Emergency Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1017
Launched : 2016
Annals of Mens Health and Wellness
ISSN : 2641-7707
Launched : 2017
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Health Care
ISSN : 2576-0084
Launched : 2018
Journal of Chronic Diseases and Management
ISSN : 2573-1300
Launched : 2016
Annals of Vaccines and Immunization
ISSN : 2378-9379
Launched : 2014
JSM Heart Surgery Cases and Images
ISSN : 2578-3157
Launched : 2016
Annals of Reproductive Medicine and Treatment
ISSN : 2573-1092
Launched : 2016
JSM Brain Science
ISSN : 2573-1289
Launched : 2016
JSM Biomarkers
ISSN : 2578-3815
Launched : 2014
JSM Biology
ISSN : 2475-9392
Launched : 2016
Archives of Stem Cell and Research
ISSN : 2578-3580
Launched : 2014
Annals of Clinical and Medical Microbiology
ISSN : 2578-3629
Launched : 2014
JSM Pediatric Surgery
ISSN : 2578-3149
Launched : 2017
Journal of Memory Disorder and Rehabilitation
ISSN : 2578-319X
Launched : 2016
JSM Tropical Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2578-3165
Launched : 2016
JSM Head and Face Medicine
ISSN : 2578-3793
Launched : 2016
JSM Cardiothoracic Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1297
Launched : 2016
JSM Bone and Joint Diseases
ISSN : 2578-3351
Launched : 2017
JSM Bioavailability and Bioequivalence
ISSN : 2641-7812
Launched : 2017
JSM Atherosclerosis
ISSN : 2573-1270
Launched : 2016
Journal of Genitourinary Disorders
ISSN : 2641-7790
Launched : 2017
Journal of Fractures and Sprains
ISSN : 2578-3831
Launched : 2016
Journal of Autism and Epilepsy
ISSN : 2641-7774
Launched : 2016
Annals of Marine Biology and Research
ISSN : 2573-105X
Launched : 2014
JSM Health Education & Primary Health Care
ISSN : 2578-3777
Launched : 2016
JSM Communication Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3807
Launched : 2016
Annals of Musculoskeletal Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3599
Launched : 2016
Annals of Virology and Research
ISSN : 2573-1122
Launched : 2014
JSM Renal Medicine
ISSN : 2573-1637
Launched : 2016
Journal of Muscle Health
ISSN : 2578-3823
Launched : 2016
JSM Genetics and Genomics
ISSN : 2334-1823
Launched : 2013
JSM Anxiety and Depression
ISSN : 2475-9139
Launched : 2016
Clinical Journal of Heart Diseases
ISSN : 2641-7766
Launched : 2016
Annals of Medicinal Chemistry and Research
ISSN : 2378-9336
Launched : 2014
JSM Pain and Management
ISSN : 2578-3378
Launched : 2016
JSM Women's Health
ISSN : 2578-3696
Launched : 2016
Clinical Research in HIV or AIDS
ISSN : 2374-0094
Launched : 2013
Journal of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Obesity
ISSN : 2333-6692
Launched : 2013
Journal of Substance Abuse and Alcoholism
ISSN : 2373-9363
Launched : 2013
JSM Neurosurgery and Spine
ISSN : 2373-9479
Launched : 2013
Journal of Liver and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2379-0830
Launched : 2014
Journal of Drug Design and Research
ISSN : 2379-089X
Launched : 2014
JSM Clinical Oncology and Research
ISSN : 2373-938X
Launched : 2013
JSM Bioinformatics, Genomics and Proteomics
ISSN : 2576-1102
Launched : 2014
JSM Chemistry
ISSN : 2334-1831
Launched : 2013
Journal of Trauma and Care
ISSN : 2573-1246
Launched : 2014
JSM Surgical Oncology and Research
ISSN : 2578-3688
Launched : 2016
Annals of Food Processing and Preservation
ISSN : 2573-1033
Launched : 2016
Journal of Radiology and Radiation Therapy
ISSN : 2333-7095
Launched : 2013
JSM Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
ISSN : 2578-3572
Launched : 2016
Annals of Clinical Pathology
ISSN : 2373-9282
Launched : 2013
Annals of Cardiovascular Diseases
ISSN : 2641-7731
Launched : 2016
Journal of Behavior
ISSN : 2576-0076
Launched : 2016
Annals of Clinical and Experimental Metabolism
ISSN : 2572-2492
Launched : 2016
Clinical Research in Infectious Diseases
ISSN : 2379-0636
Launched : 2013
JSM Microbiology
ISSN : 2333-6455
Launched : 2013
Journal of Urology and Research
ISSN : 2379-951X
Launched : 2014
Journal of Family Medicine and Community Health
ISSN : 2379-0547
Launched : 2013
Annals of Pregnancy and Care
ISSN : 2578-336X
Launched : 2017
JSM Cell and Developmental Biology
ISSN : 2379-061X
Launched : 2013
Annals of Aquaculture and Research
ISSN : 2379-0881
Launched : 2014
Clinical Research in Pulmonology
ISSN : 2333-6625
Launched : 2013
Annals of Forensic Research and Analysis
ISSN : 2378-9476
Launched : 2014
JSM Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
ISSN : 2333-7109
Launched : 2013
Annals of Breast Cancer Research
ISSN : 2641-7685
Launched : 2016
Annals of Gerontology and Geriatric Research
ISSN : 2378-9409
Launched : 2014
Journal of Sleep Medicine and Disorders
ISSN : 2379-0822
Launched : 2014
JSM Burns and Trauma
ISSN : 2475-9406
Launched : 2016
Chemical Engineering and Process Techniques
ISSN : 2333-6633
Launched : 2013
Annals of Clinical Cytology and Pathology
ISSN : 2475-9430
Launched : 2014
JSM Allergy and Asthma
ISSN : 2573-1254
Launched : 2016
Journal of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
ISSN : 2334-2307
Launched : 2013
Annals of Sports Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2379-0571
Launched : 2014
JSM Sexual Medicine
ISSN : 2578-3718
Launched : 2016
Annals of Vascular Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2378-9344
Launched : 2014
JSM Biotechnology and Biomedical Engineering
ISSN : 2333-7117
Launched : 2013
Journal of Hematology and Transfusion
ISSN : 2333-6684
Launched : 2013
JSM Environmental Science and Ecology
ISSN : 2333-7141
Launched : 2013
Journal of Cardiology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2333-6676
Launched : 2013
JSM Nanotechnology and Nanomedicine
ISSN : 2334-1815
Launched : 2013
Journal of Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders
ISSN : 2475-9473
Launched : 2016
JSM Ophthalmology
ISSN : 2333-6447
Launched : 2013
Journal of Pharmacology and Clinical Toxicology
ISSN : 2333-7079
Launched : 2013
Annals of Psychiatry and Mental Health
ISSN : 2374-0124
Launched : 2013
Medical Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
ISSN : 2333-6439
Launched : 2013
Annals of Pediatrics and Child Health
ISSN : 2373-9312
Launched : 2013
JSM Clinical Pharmaceutics
ISSN : 2379-9498
Launched : 2014
JSM Foot and Ankle
ISSN : 2475-9112
Launched : 2016
JSM Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementia
ISSN : 2378-9565
Launched : 2014
Journal of Addiction Medicine and Therapy
ISSN : 2333-665X
Launched : 2013
Journal of Veterinary Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2378-931X
Launched : 2013
Annals of Public Health and Research
ISSN : 2378-9328
Launched : 2014
Annals of Orthopedics and Rheumatology
ISSN : 2373-9290
Launched : 2013
Journal of Clinical Nephrology and Research
ISSN : 2379-0652
Launched : 2014
Annals of Community Medicine and Practice
ISSN : 2475-9465
Launched : 2014
Annals of Biometrics and Biostatistics
ISSN : 2374-0116
Launched : 2013
JSM Clinical Case Reports
ISSN : 2373-9819
Launched : 2013
Journal of Cancer Biology and Research
ISSN : 2373-9436
Launched : 2013
Journal of Surgery and Transplantation Science
ISSN : 2379-0911
Launched : 2013
Journal of Dermatology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2373-9371
Launched : 2013
JSM Gastroenterology and Hepatology
ISSN : 2373-9487
Launched : 2013
Annals of Nursing and Practice
ISSN : 2379-9501
Launched : 2014
JSM Dentistry
ISSN : 2333-7133
Launched : 2013
Author Information X