Loading

Journal of Urology and Research

An Update on Minimally Invasive Adrenalectomy

Review Article | Open Access | Volume 3 | Issue 5

  • 1. Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, USA
  • 2. Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, USA
+ Show More - Show Less
Corresponding Authors
Edward Chin, Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 5 E. 98th Street, Box 1259, New York, USA, Tel: 212-241-2115; Fax: 212-241-5979
Absract

Adrenal tumors require careful clinical and biochemical evaluation with appropriate imaging to determine malignancy or functional status. Tumors that are suspicious or confirmed for malignancy or hormone-secreting require adrenalectomy. This review discusses adrenal gland anatomy, physiology, and pathology, indications for adrenalectomy, preoperative management, and an update on surgical approaches with an emphasis on minimally invasive techniques. We describe the transabdominal and retroperitoneoscopic approaches to adrenalectomy and briefly discuss extensions of minimally invasive surgery including robotic-assisted and single portadrenalectomy.

Keywords

Minimally invasive surgery; Adrenalectomy; Laparoscopy; Posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy; Laparoscopic transabdominal adrenalectomy

Citation

Yim C, Lee D, Arora S, Nguyen S, Zhang L, et al. (2016) An Update on Minimally Invasive Adrenalectomy. J Urol Res 3(5): 1062.

ABBREVIATIONS

ACC: Zadrenocortical Carcinoma; PRA: Posterior Retroperitoneoscopic Adrenalectomy; IVC: Inferior Vena Cava; RAA: Robot-Assisted Adrenalectomy; SILS: Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery; LESS: Laparoendoscopic Single-Site; LA: Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy

INTRODUCTION

Though surgical approaches to adrenalectomy continue to evolve, minimally invasive laparoscopic adrenalectomy has become the gold standard for resection of adrenal tumors in the last decade. It was first reported in the literature in 1992 and has subsequently changed the management of adrenal tumors [1]. Since then, minimally invasive adrenalectomy has been shown to have decreased length of stay, reduced healthcare cost, fewer wound complications, less blood loss, earlier patient mobility, and faster return to regular activity [2-4]. This review discusses the adrenal gland anatomy, physiology, and pathology, indications for adrenalectomy, preoperative considerations, and surgical approaches.

ANATOMY, PHYSIOLOGY, AND PATHOLOGY OF THE ADRENAL GLAND

The adrenal gland is composed of two distinct units: the outer cortex and inner medulla. The cortex is mesoderm-derived and further divided into three zones: glomerulosa, fasciculata, and reticularis. Mineralocorticoids such as aldosterone are produced in the glomerulosa and play a key role in regulating blood pressure and electrolytes via the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. Cortisol, produced in the fasciculata, exerts a variety of systemic roles in metabolism and immune functioning. The deepest layer of the cortex, the reticularis, produces androgens and sex hormones. The adrenal medulla is derived from the ectoderm layer and produces epinephrine and norepinephrine in direct response to the sympathetic nervous system. Each gland is located in the retroperitoneum, perched atop the superior pole of the kidney. The right adrenal gland is pyramidal in shape and sits between the liver and diaphragm. The left adrenal gland is crescent shaped and lies between the left kidney and aorta. A rich arterial supply to the adrenal gland consists of branches derived segmental from the inferior phrenic artery, the aorta, and the renal artery. Venous drainage is carried from various tributaries into a single adrenal vein. The left adrenal vein is longer than the right and drains into the left renal vein before draining into the inferior vena cava (IVC) while the right main vein is short and drains directly into the IVC.

Dysfunction of the adrenal gland produces various endocrine disorders. Benign lesions of the adrenal cortex include adenomas, lipomas, adrenal cortical hyperplasia and myelolipomas. Malignant tumors of the adrenal cortex include adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC). Tumors of the adrenal medulla consist of benign and malignant pheochromocytoma that may belong to a hereditary disorder such as multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2, von Hippel-Landau disease, or neurofibromatosis. The rich vascular network of the adrenal gland enables metastases from many primary sources such as the kidney, lung and colon.

INDICATIONS FOR ADRENALECTOMY

With the widespread use of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in clinical practice, the prevalence of incidental adrenal masses has increased such that the term adrenal incidentaloma was coined. Defined as a mass greater than 1 cm in diameter detected during imaging performed for other indications, adrenal incidentalomas had a prevalence of 4.4% in one prospective study among subjects undergoing CT scans for other indications [5]. Comparably, in autopsy prevalence studies, the mean incidence of adrenal tumors was found to be approximately 6% [5]. Adrenalectomy is indicated for suspected or confirmed malignancy and hormonesecreting adrenal masses [6].

IMAGING

Radiographic imaging is a key to differentiating malignant from benign adrenal lesions. The assessment of tumor size, morphology, CT density, MRI signal characteristics, and enhancement after administration of contrast are critical for diagnostic evaluation and work up. Tumor diameter has been highly correlated with the risk of malignancy: adrenocortical carcinomas are significantly associated with increased size, with 90% being larger than 4 cm in diameter at the time of discovery in one study [7]. However in retrospective review the 4 cm diameter cutoff has a high sensitivity (93%) for malignancy but poor specificity (43%) [8]. Therefore, adrenal incidentalomas greater than 4 cm when discovered are more concerning for malignancy and warrant either close surveillance or resection.

In addition to size, imaging phenotype plays an important role in distinguishing adrenal lesions. Benign adrenal tumors are typically 6 cm in size with growth over time and hetereogeneous on imaging with irregular borders and lack clear planes [9]. Additionally, adrenal cortical carcinoma has greater density on non-contrast CT, usually >25 HU, and peripheral enhancement on CT post-contrast in comparison to benign masses which are typically <10 HU and demonstrate little to no enhancement [10].

BIOCHEMICAL EVALUATION

Initial evaluation of an adrenal mass requires a combined clinical and biochemical approach in order to evaluate if an adrenal tumor is malignant and/or functional. Biochemical evaluation varies depending on the suspected hormonesecreting adrenal tumors. However, all patients with an adrenal mass on imaging should have a workup including plasma or urinary metanephrines to rule out pheochromocytomas prior to any invasive procedure. A summary of common symptoms and suggested workup for hormone-secreting adrenal tumors is presented in Table (1).

PREOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT

Preoperative management should be tailored to each patient and must take into account the tumor type. For example, patients with a pheochromocytoma are at risk for intraoperative hemodynamic instability. Alpha-adrenergic blockade is typically administered 10-14 days preoperatively to control hypertension. If a patient is tachycardic, then beta-blockade may be added. Concurrently, volume expansion is key prior to resection of a pheochromocytoma. Patients are encouraged to increase their fluid and sodium intake because high levels of catecholamines induce volume contraction and alpha-adrenergic blockade can induce postoperative orthostasis. Patients with cortisol-secreting tumors, on the other hand, may experience hypotension due to adrenal insufficiency following adrenalectomy. These patients may require intravenous perioperative steroids with transition to an oral taper as an outpatient. In all cases, close collaboration with the anesthesia team is required in order to prepare for intraoperative hemodynamic changes.

MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGICAL APPROACHES

Various minimally invasive approaches to the adrenal glands have been adopted. The laparoscopic transabdominal approach was first described by Gagner et al., [1], and retroperitoneal by Mercan et al., [11]. The major advantages, disadvantages, and contraindications are listed in Table (2), followed by a summary of the different techniques [12,13].

LAPAROSCOPIC TRANSABDOMINAL APPROACH

Patient positioning

After induction of general anesthesia, the patient is placed in a lateral decubitus position with the side with the adrenal gland to be resected facing up. Using the costal arch as a fulcrum, the patient’s flank is stretched by lowering the trunk and legs to widen the working space between the costal margin and the iliac crest. The operating surgeon is positioned on the opposite side of the adrenal gland to be removed. First and second assistants are on the same side respectively to the right and to the left of the operating surgeon. The patient should be draped down to the midline of the abdomen, and the costal margin and midline marked. Entry technique of the surgeon’s choice may be used to enter the abdominal space and place the first 10 mm trocar (T1) 3 cm under the costal arch at the anterior axillary line. A 30° scope is used with this trocar to later extract the specimen. After insufflating the abdominal cavity to 15 mm Hg, inspection for intra-abdominal adhesions should be performed. Additional trocars may be positioned at least 5 cm to the left (T2 10-12 mm) and right (T3 5 mm) of the initial port and 1-5 cm from the costal arch. A fourth trocar, T4, may be placed in the paraxiphoid area for liver retraction.

Right flank transabdominal laparoscopic adrenalectomy

The patient is placed right flank up for a right adrenalectomy. The right adrenal gland sits under the right liver lobe, lateral to the inferior vena cava (IVC), inferior to both superior pole of the kidney and the right renal vein. After trocar and scope placement, a liver retractor may be used to mobilize the liver and retract it medially, exposing the adrenal gland and the IVC (Figure 1).

Figure 1 Right adrenalectomy exposing the right adrenal vein the middle port. draining into the inferior vena cava (IVC).

Using blunt dissection and electrocautery, a plane is created between the adrenal gland and IVC. The right adrenal vein drains directly into the IVC and can be located by dissecting the gland on its medial border. Once it is clearly separated, the adrenal vein is doubly ligated with clips, and the remaining medial and inferomedial attachments are divided. Once the adrenal gland is lifted, the avascular posterior and lateral attachments may be ligated. The gland is placed in a specimen pouch and removed from the largest port site. The fascia for the extraction trocar site is then closed.

Left flank transabdominal laparoscopic adrenalectomy

The patient is placed left flank up for a left adrenalectomy. Three trocars are inserted in the subcostal space as described above with an optional fourth inserted 4-5 cm below the first one that can be used for gentle retraction. The lack of major anatomical landmarks like the IVC, smaller size of the left adrenal vein and presence of pancreatic tail in the operative field can make left adrenalectomy challenging. First the splenic flexure is mobilized and the colon is swept inferiorly. Next the splenoparietal ligament is dissected up to the diaphragm for total mobilization of the spleen. Then, the splenorenal ligaments are retracted medially and anteriorly and divided. Careful dissection of the posterior surface of the spleen followed by the tail of the pancreas is performed, maintaining a plane between the pancreas and left kidney. Once the spleen and tail of the pancreas are retracted medially, an additional trocar may be placed for retraction. The adrenal gland should be visualized adjacent to the superior pole of the kidney, and blunt dissection and electrocautery may be used to dissect the medial edge of the adrenal gland from upper to lower pole. During this dissection, the left adrenal vein, which drains into the left renal vein, is isolated, doubly clipped and divided. Lifting the adrenal gland up exposes its posterior aspect, allowing for dissection of the remaining attachments at the posterolateral edge. Once the gland is mobilized it is removed via extraction bag.

Posterior Retroperitoneoscopic Approach

After induction of general anesthetic, the patient is placed in the prone, jack-knife position with all pressure points padded, in order to maximize space between the posterior costal margin and the posterior iliac crest. The surgical team is positioned on the same side as the adrenal lesion. Important landmarks are the 12th rib and iliac crest. A 1.5 cm transverse incision is made below the tip of the 12th rib, and blunt and sharp dissection is used to reach the retroperitoneal space. Using finger guidance, two 5-10 mm trocars are placed 4-5 cm in the mid axillary line and sacrospinalis muscle, respectively. A blunt trocar with inflatable balloon and adjustable sleeve is then placed in the initial incisional site to insufflate retroperitoneal space to 20-25 mmHg. A 5-10 mm 30° endoscope is introduced into the first trocar and used for retroperitoneoscopy while the lateral two ports are used by the operating surgeon.

The Zuckerkandl’s fascia is then opened using blunt and sharp dissection to access the retroperitoneum. The first and most important landmark in PRA is exposure and dissection of the upper pole of the kidney. The operative field is thus demarcated by the kidney upper pole caudally, the diaphragm cranially, the peritoneum laterally, and the spine medially. Dissection of the kidney upper pole exposes the inferior edge of the adrenal gland. By lifting the adrenal gland, the surgeon can identify the adrenal vein. For a right adrenalectomy, lifting the gland exposes the IVC which drains the short right adrenal vein. After dissecting free the adrenal vein, it is divided between clips. In a left adrenalectomy, it is possible to use the diaphragmatic vein joining the main left adrenal vein between the adrenal gland and the diaphragmatic branch as a landmark to identify the left adrenal vein. Once dissected, the left adrenal vein can then be sectioned between clips. The remaining adrenal attachments are then dissected, and the resected adrenal gland may be extracted via specimen bag in the middle port.

Table 1: Biochemical Evaluation of Functional Adrenal Tumors.

  Symptoms Workup
Pheochromocytoma Hypertension
Headache
Palpitations
Sweating 
Plasma free 
metanephrines
24-h urinary 
fractionated 
catecholamines and 
metanephrines
CorticosteroidProducing Tumors Centripetal obesity
Plethora
Moon face
Skin atrophy and 
bruising
Hypertension
Glucose intolerance
Gonadal dysfunction
Muscle weakness
24-h urinary free 
cortisol
1 mg overnight 
dexamethasone 
suppression test
Midnight salivary 
cortisol test 
Aldosterone-Producing 
Tumors
Hypertension
Headache
Arrhythmias
Muscle cramps 
Serum aldosterone to 
renin ratio 

Table 2: Comparison of laparoscopic transabdominal adrenalectomy and posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy.

  Laparoscopic 
transabdominal 
adrenalectomy
Posterior 
retroperitoneoscopic 
adrenalectomy (PRA)
Advantages Wide operative field 
Easy to combine with 
other transabdominal 
procedures
Easy to convert to open 
approach 
Safer in cases with 
abdominal adhesions 
No repositioning needed 
for bilateral adrenalectomy
Disadvantages Repositioning required for 
bilateral adrenalectomy
May be challenging in 
previously operated fields
Small working space limits 
size of lesions suitable for 
this approach 
Not recommended for 
obese patients 
Contraindications Known or highly suspected malignancy with local invasion
OTHER APPROACHES

Robotic-Assisted Adrenalectomy (RAA)

As advances in minimally invasive procedures continue to be made, surgeons have explored the use of RAA. First described in 2001, RAA has now been used in both PRA and transabdominal adrenalectomy [14]. Proponents of this technique cite the twodimensional view and poor ergonomics for the surgeon in laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) as reasons for using RAA to perform more precise surgery. The literature reports similar effectiveness and short-term outcomes in RAA and LA [15,16]. While others have described significantly longer operative times with RAA than LA [17,18], other authors showed that operative time improves with increased experience after the initial learning curve [19,20]. Finally, many authors report no difference in morbidity and mortality between RAA and LA [15–18,20,21]. RAA may be preferred in cases of bilateral adrenalectomy to perform cortical sparing adrenalectomy to avoid steroid dependence and for PRA it may be useful in patients with glands above the 12th rib [22].

Single port technique

Single-incision minimally invasive surgery known as singleincision laparoscopic surgery (SILS)/laparoendoscopic singlesite (LESS) adrenalectomy is also of interest for addressing adrenal pathology. Although LA is less morbid and offers superior cosmetic results to open adrenalectomy, it still requires multiple incisions, each of which carries risk of pain, port-site complications, and scarring. SILS/LESS adrenalectomy has been developed to address these points and has been used in both PRA and transabdominal cases. The most recent meta-analysis by Wu et al., in 2016 concluded that LESS adrenalectomy is a safe alternative to LA with shorter hospital stay and better postoperative pain scores in certain patients [23]. Similar to older reports [24,25], Wu et al did not find significant differences in operative time, perioperative complications, and estimated blood loss. Data on this approach remains limited and further research is necessary to better understand its limitations and benefits.

Open Approach

Although LA is now the gold standard for adrenalectomy, the open approach is still required for certain indications. More often, tumor characteristics make open adrenalectomy preferable over a laparoscopic approach. Historically, tumor size >6 cm and significant risk of ACC were seen as contraindications to a minimally invasive approach. Newer data makes the case that size exceeding 6 cm is not an absolute contraindication, especially in the absence of local invasion [26]. An open approach is the current recommendation for patients with evidence of malignancy and local invasion on preoperative imaging studies to allow for complete resection, lymph node dissection, and en bloc resection of adjacent structures.

 

     
     
     
     

 

     
     
     
   

 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Adrenal tumors discovered incidentally or otherwise, should have appropriate biochemical evaluation and imaging as part of work up to determine malignancy and functional status. Suspected or confirmed malignancy and hormone-secreting adrenal tumors should be treated with adrenalectomy. Minimally invasive adrenalectomy is effective, safe, and decreases hospital stays, operative blood loss, and wound complications. Since its introduction, it has become the standard of care for resecting adrenal tumors. Both the transabdominal and posterior retroperitoneoscopic approaches are appropriate for most adrenal pathology. Traditionally, the transabdominal approach has been the standard method although PRA has demonstrated increasing popularity amongst surgeons. Two recent studies, including a systematic review of eight studies comparing PRA to transabdominal adrenalectomy [27], and a randomized clinical trial of PRA versus transabdominal adrenalectomy [28], found PRA to be superior or at least comparable to the transabdominal approach in blood loss, operative time, pain score, length of stay, and return to activity. The feasibility of minimally invasive adrenalectomy as an ambulatory procedure remains uncertain, with one study reporting an 100% success rate in 22 cases [29] and other studies using perioperative variables to identify candidates for early discharge [30]. More recently, extensions of minimally invasive adrenalectomy have been explored, including robotic-assisted adrenalectomy and single-incision technique, with promising results. An open approach is still recommended for known or highly suspicious malignancy with local invasion.

REFERENCES

1. Gagner M, Lacroix A, Bolté E. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy in Cushing’s syndrome and pheochromocytoma. N Engl J Med. 1992; 327: 1033.

2. Gagner M, Pomp A, Heniford BT, Pharand D, Lacroix A. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: lessons learned from 100 consecutive procedures. Ann Surg. 1997; 226: 238-246.

3. Brunt LM, Moley JF, Doherty GM, Lairmore TC, DeBenedetti MK, Quasebarth MA. Outcomes analysis in patients undergoing laparoscopic adrenalectomy for hormonally active adrenal tumors. Surgery. 2001; 130: 625-629.

4. Heslin MJ, Winzeler AH, Weingarten JO, Diethelm AG, Urist MM, Bland KI. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy and splenectomy are safe and reduce hospital stay and charges. Am Surg. 2003; 69: 377-381.

5. Bovio S, Cataldi A, Reimondo G, Sperone P, Novello S, Berruti A, et al. Prevalence of adrenal incidentaloma in a contemporary computerized tomography series. J Endocrinol Invest. 2006; 29: 298-302.

6. Zeiger MA, Thompson GB, Duh QY, Hamrahian AH, Angelos P, Elaraj D, et al. The American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American Association of Endocrine Surgeons medical guidelines for the management of adrenal incidentalomas. Endocr Pract. 2009; 15: 1-20.

7. Angeli A, Osella G, Alì A, Terzolo M. Adrenal incidentaloma: an overview of clinical and epidemiological data from the National Italian Study Group. Horm Res. 1997; 47: 279-283.

8. Mantero F, Terzolo M, Arnaldi G, Osella G, Masini AM, Alì A, et al. A survey on adrenal incidentaloma in Italy. Study Group on Adrenal Tumors of the Italian Society of Endocrinology. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000; 85: 637-644.

9. Mazzaglia PJ. Radiographic evaluation of nonfunctioning adrenal neoplasms. Surg Clin North Am. 2014; 94: 625-642.

10. Blake MA, Cronin CG, Boland GW. Adrenal imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010; 194: 1450-1460.

11. Mercan S, Seven R, Ozarmagan S, Tezelman S. Endoscopic retroperitoneal adrenalectomy. Ann Surg. 1995; 118: 1071-1076.

12. Mulholland MW, Albo D, Dalman R, Hawn M, Hughes S, Sabel MS. Operative Techniques in Surgery. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 2014.

13. Valeri A, Bergamini C, Bellantone R, Lombardi C. Surgery of the Adrenal Gland. 1st edition. Springer-Verlag Mailand. 2013.

14. Horgan S, Vanuno D. Robots in laparoscopic surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2001; 11: 415-419.

15. Brunaud L, Bresler L, Ayav A, Zarnegar R, Raphoz AL, Levan T, et al. Robotic-assisted adrenalectomy: what advantages compared to lateral transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy? Am J Surg. 2008; 195: 433-438.

16. Brunaud L, Bresler L, Zarnegar R, Ayav A, Cormier L, Tretou S, et al. Does robotic adrenalectomy improve patient quality of life when compared to laparoscopic adrenalectomy? World J Surg. 2004; 28: 1180-1185.

17. Wu JC-H, Wu H-S, Lin M-S, Chou D-A, Huang M-H. Comparison of robotassisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy with traditional laparoscopic adrenalectomy - 1 year follow-up. Surg Endosc. 2008; 22: 463-466.

18. Morino M, Benincà G, Giraudo G, Del Genio GM, Rebecchi F, Garrone C. Robot-assisted vs laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2004; 18: 1742-1746.

19. Agcaoglu O, Aliyev S, Karabulut K, Siperstein A, Berber E. Robotic vs laparoscopic posterior retroperitoneal adrenalectomy. Arch Surg. 2012; 147: 272-275.

20. Winter JM, Talamini MA, Stanfield CL, Chang DC, Hundt JD, Dackiw AP, et al. Thirty robotic adrenalectomies: a single institution’s experience. Surg Endosc. 2006; 20: 119-124.

21. Benway BM, Bhayani SB, Rogers CG, Dulabon LM, Patel MN, Lipkin M, et al. Robot assisted partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumors: a multi-institutional analysis of perioperative outcomes. J Urol. 2009; 182: 866-872.

22. Morris LF, Perrier ND. Advances in robotic adrenalectomy. Curr Opin Oncol. 2012; 24: 1-6.

23. Wu S, Lai H, Zhao J, Chen J, Mo X, Zuo H, et al. Laparoendoscopic Single-site Adrenalectomy versus Conventional Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy: An Updated Meta Analysis. Urol J. 2016; 13: 2590- 2598.

24. Hirasawa Y, Miyajima A, Hattori S, Miyashita K, Kurihara I, Shibata H, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site adrenalectomy versus conventional laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a comparison of surgical outcomes and an analysis of a single surgeon’s learning curve. Surg Endosc. 2014; 28: 2911-2919.

25. Vidal O, Astudillo E, Valentini M, Ginestá C, Espert JJ, Gracía-Valdecasas JC, et al. Single-port laparoscopic left adrenalectomy (SILS): 3 years’ experience of a single institution. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2014; 24: 440-443.

26. Parnaby CN, Chong PS, Chisholm L, Farrow J, Connell JM, O’Dwyer PJ. The role of laparoscopic adrenalectomy for adrenal tumours of 6 cm or greater. Surg Endosc. 2008; 22: 617-621.

27. Chai YJ, Kwon H, Yu HW, Kim SJ, Choi JY, Lee KE, et al. Systematic Review of Surgical Approaches for Adrenal Tumors: Lateral Transperitoneal versus Posterior Retroperitoneal and Laparoscopic versus Robotic Adrenalectomy. Int J Endocrinol. 2014; 918346: 11.

28. Barczynski M, Konturek A, Nowak W. Randomized clinical trial of posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy versus lateral transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy with a 5-year follow-up. Ann Surg. 2014; 260: 740-748.

29. Skattum J, Edwin B, Trondsen E, Mjåland O, Raede J, Buanes T. Outpatient laparoscopic surgery: feasibility and consequences for education and health care costs. Surg Endosc. 2004; 18: 796-801.

30. Turrentine FE, Stukenborg GJ, Hanks JB, Smith PW. Elective laparoscopic adrenalectomy outcomes in 1099 ACS NSQIP patients: identifying candidates for early discharge. Am Surg. 2015; 81: 507- 514.

Yim C, Lee D, Arora S, Nguyen S, Zhang L, et al. (2016) An Update on Minimally Invasive Adrenalectomy. J Urol Res 3(5): 1062.

Received : 17 Jun 2016
Accepted : 27 Jun 2016
Published : 29 Jun 2016
Journals
Annals of Otolaryngology and Rhinology
ISSN : 2379-948X
Launched : 2014
JSM Schizophrenia
Launched : 2016
Journal of Nausea
Launched : 2020
JSM Internal Medicine
Launched : 2016
JSM Hepatitis
Launched : 2016
JSM Oro Facial Surgeries
ISSN : 2578-3211
Launched : 2016
Journal of Human Nutrition and Food Science
ISSN : 2333-6706
Launched : 2013
JSM Regenerative Medicine and Bioengineering
ISSN : 2379-0490
Launched : 2013
JSM Spine
ISSN : 2578-3181
Launched : 2016
Archives of Palliative Care
ISSN : 2573-1165
Launched : 2016
JSM Nutritional Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3203
Launched : 2017
Annals of Neurodegenerative Disorders
ISSN : 2476-2032
Launched : 2016
Journal of Fever
ISSN : 2641-7782
Launched : 2017
JSM Bone Marrow Research
ISSN : 2578-3351
Launched : 2016
JSM Mathematics and Statistics
ISSN : 2578-3173
Launched : 2014
Journal of Autoimmunity and Research
ISSN : 2573-1173
Launched : 2014
JSM Arthritis
ISSN : 2475-9155
Launched : 2016
JSM Head and Neck Cancer-Cases and Reviews
ISSN : 2573-1610
Launched : 2016
JSM General Surgery Cases and Images
ISSN : 2573-1564
Launched : 2016
JSM Anatomy and Physiology
ISSN : 2573-1262
Launched : 2016
JSM Dental Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1548
Launched : 2016
Annals of Emergency Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1017
Launched : 2016
Annals of Mens Health and Wellness
ISSN : 2641-7707
Launched : 2017
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Health Care
ISSN : 2576-0084
Launched : 2018
Journal of Chronic Diseases and Management
ISSN : 2573-1300
Launched : 2016
Annals of Vaccines and Immunization
ISSN : 2378-9379
Launched : 2014
JSM Heart Surgery Cases and Images
ISSN : 2578-3157
Launched : 2016
Annals of Reproductive Medicine and Treatment
ISSN : 2573-1092
Launched : 2016
JSM Brain Science
ISSN : 2573-1289
Launched : 2016
JSM Biomarkers
ISSN : 2578-3815
Launched : 2014
JSM Biology
ISSN : 2475-9392
Launched : 2016
Archives of Stem Cell and Research
ISSN : 2578-3580
Launched : 2014
Annals of Clinical and Medical Microbiology
ISSN : 2578-3629
Launched : 2014
JSM Pediatric Surgery
ISSN : 2578-3149
Launched : 2017
Journal of Memory Disorder and Rehabilitation
ISSN : 2578-319X
Launched : 2016
JSM Tropical Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2578-3165
Launched : 2016
JSM Head and Face Medicine
ISSN : 2578-3793
Launched : 2016
JSM Cardiothoracic Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1297
Launched : 2016
JSM Bone and Joint Diseases
ISSN : 2578-3351
Launched : 2017
JSM Bioavailability and Bioequivalence
ISSN : 2641-7812
Launched : 2017
JSM Atherosclerosis
ISSN : 2573-1270
Launched : 2016
Journal of Genitourinary Disorders
ISSN : 2641-7790
Launched : 2017
Journal of Fractures and Sprains
ISSN : 2578-3831
Launched : 2016
Journal of Autism and Epilepsy
ISSN : 2641-7774
Launched : 2016
Annals of Marine Biology and Research
ISSN : 2573-105X
Launched : 2014
JSM Health Education & Primary Health Care
ISSN : 2578-3777
Launched : 2016
JSM Communication Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3807
Launched : 2016
Annals of Musculoskeletal Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3599
Launched : 2016
Annals of Virology and Research
ISSN : 2573-1122
Launched : 2014
JSM Renal Medicine
ISSN : 2573-1637
Launched : 2016
Journal of Muscle Health
ISSN : 2578-3823
Launched : 2016
JSM Genetics and Genomics
ISSN : 2334-1823
Launched : 2013
JSM Anxiety and Depression
ISSN : 2475-9139
Launched : 2016
Clinical Journal of Heart Diseases
ISSN : 2641-7766
Launched : 2016
Annals of Medicinal Chemistry and Research
ISSN : 2378-9336
Launched : 2014
JSM Pain and Management
ISSN : 2578-3378
Launched : 2016
JSM Women's Health
ISSN : 2578-3696
Launched : 2016
Clinical Research in HIV or AIDS
ISSN : 2374-0094
Launched : 2013
Journal of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Obesity
ISSN : 2333-6692
Launched : 2013
Journal of Substance Abuse and Alcoholism
ISSN : 2373-9363
Launched : 2013
JSM Neurosurgery and Spine
ISSN : 2373-9479
Launched : 2013
Journal of Liver and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2379-0830
Launched : 2014
Journal of Drug Design and Research
ISSN : 2379-089X
Launched : 2014
JSM Clinical Oncology and Research
ISSN : 2373-938X
Launched : 2013
JSM Bioinformatics, Genomics and Proteomics
ISSN : 2576-1102
Launched : 2014
JSM Chemistry
ISSN : 2334-1831
Launched : 2013
Journal of Trauma and Care
ISSN : 2573-1246
Launched : 2014
JSM Surgical Oncology and Research
ISSN : 2578-3688
Launched : 2016
Annals of Food Processing and Preservation
ISSN : 2573-1033
Launched : 2016
Journal of Radiology and Radiation Therapy
ISSN : 2333-7095
Launched : 2013
JSM Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
ISSN : 2578-3572
Launched : 2016
Annals of Clinical Pathology
ISSN : 2373-9282
Launched : 2013
Annals of Cardiovascular Diseases
ISSN : 2641-7731
Launched : 2016
Journal of Behavior
ISSN : 2576-0076
Launched : 2016
Annals of Clinical and Experimental Metabolism
ISSN : 2572-2492
Launched : 2016
Clinical Research in Infectious Diseases
ISSN : 2379-0636
Launched : 2013
JSM Microbiology
ISSN : 2333-6455
Launched : 2013
Journal of Family Medicine and Community Health
ISSN : 2379-0547
Launched : 2013
Annals of Pregnancy and Care
ISSN : 2578-336X
Launched : 2017
JSM Cell and Developmental Biology
ISSN : 2379-061X
Launched : 2013
Annals of Aquaculture and Research
ISSN : 2379-0881
Launched : 2014
Clinical Research in Pulmonology
ISSN : 2333-6625
Launched : 2013
Journal of Immunology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2333-6714
Launched : 2013
Annals of Forensic Research and Analysis
ISSN : 2378-9476
Launched : 2014
JSM Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
ISSN : 2333-7109
Launched : 2013
Annals of Breast Cancer Research
ISSN : 2641-7685
Launched : 2016
Annals of Gerontology and Geriatric Research
ISSN : 2378-9409
Launched : 2014
Journal of Sleep Medicine and Disorders
ISSN : 2379-0822
Launched : 2014
JSM Burns and Trauma
ISSN : 2475-9406
Launched : 2016
Chemical Engineering and Process Techniques
ISSN : 2333-6633
Launched : 2013
Annals of Clinical Cytology and Pathology
ISSN : 2475-9430
Launched : 2014
JSM Allergy and Asthma
ISSN : 2573-1254
Launched : 2016
Journal of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
ISSN : 2334-2307
Launched : 2013
Annals of Sports Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2379-0571
Launched : 2014
JSM Sexual Medicine
ISSN : 2578-3718
Launched : 2016
Annals of Vascular Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2378-9344
Launched : 2014
JSM Biotechnology and Biomedical Engineering
ISSN : 2333-7117
Launched : 2013
Journal of Hematology and Transfusion
ISSN : 2333-6684
Launched : 2013
JSM Environmental Science and Ecology
ISSN : 2333-7141
Launched : 2013
Journal of Cardiology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2333-6676
Launched : 2013
JSM Nanotechnology and Nanomedicine
ISSN : 2334-1815
Launched : 2013
Journal of Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders
ISSN : 2475-9473
Launched : 2016
JSM Ophthalmology
ISSN : 2333-6447
Launched : 2013
Journal of Pharmacology and Clinical Toxicology
ISSN : 2333-7079
Launched : 2013
Annals of Psychiatry and Mental Health
ISSN : 2374-0124
Launched : 2013
Medical Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
ISSN : 2333-6439
Launched : 2013
Annals of Pediatrics and Child Health
ISSN : 2373-9312
Launched : 2013
JSM Clinical Pharmaceutics
ISSN : 2379-9498
Launched : 2014
JSM Foot and Ankle
ISSN : 2475-9112
Launched : 2016
JSM Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementia
ISSN : 2378-9565
Launched : 2014
Journal of Addiction Medicine and Therapy
ISSN : 2333-665X
Launched : 2013
Journal of Veterinary Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2378-931X
Launched : 2013
Annals of Public Health and Research
ISSN : 2378-9328
Launched : 2014
Annals of Orthopedics and Rheumatology
ISSN : 2373-9290
Launched : 2013
Journal of Clinical Nephrology and Research
ISSN : 2379-0652
Launched : 2014
Annals of Community Medicine and Practice
ISSN : 2475-9465
Launched : 2014
Annals of Biometrics and Biostatistics
ISSN : 2374-0116
Launched : 2013
JSM Clinical Case Reports
ISSN : 2373-9819
Launched : 2013
Journal of Cancer Biology and Research
ISSN : 2373-9436
Launched : 2013
Journal of Surgery and Transplantation Science
ISSN : 2379-0911
Launched : 2013
Journal of Dermatology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2373-9371
Launched : 2013
JSM Gastroenterology and Hepatology
ISSN : 2373-9487
Launched : 2013
Annals of Nursing and Practice
ISSN : 2379-9501
Launched : 2014
JSM Dentistry
ISSN : 2333-7133
Launched : 2013
Author Information X