Fournier’s Gangrene is an infrequent yet perilous ailment that involves a swift advancement of infection in the genital area and perineum. Usually, it results from polymicrobial infection and necessitates immediate surgery along with broad-spectrum antibiotics. Factors such as diabetes, weakened immunity system, or injuries to genitals may elevate its risk level significantly. Henceforth early diagnosis followed by prompt treatment can help enhance patient outcomes while also curtailing mortality rates effectively.

A case report is presented of a 68-year-old man who was admitted to the Emergency Department due to an extensive necrotic area in his perineal and perianal regions. The patient had previously experienced uncontrolled type 2 diabetes.

• Necrotizing fasciitis of the perineum

• Perineal gangrene

• Surgical debridement

• Type 2 diabetes

Maachi Y, Boustani A, Lalaoui AS, Slaoui A, Karmouni T, et al. (2024) Surgical Debridement for Fournier’s Gangrene in Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes: Case Report and Review of Literature. J Urol Res 11(3): 1154.

Fournier’s gangrene FG is a rare ailment that primarily affects males, characterized by rapidly progressive necrotizing fasciitis in the perianal and genitourinary regions [1,2]. In 1883, Jean Alfred Fournier identified it as an idiopathic process only observed in young men; however, epidemiology has evolved over time to reveal its occurrence across all genders and ages with several identifiable causative factors [3-5]. This report showcases a case where extensive perineal and perianal region degradation occurred. The patient provided written informed consent for publication of this case alongside accompanying images while also allowing review of such documentation upon request from the editor-in-Chief of this journal.

A man aged 68, who has been suffering from uncontrolled type 2 diabetes and hypertension for over a decade, arrived at the emergency department with severe perineal pain accompanied by swelling and discolored skin [Figure 1].

Figure 1: Fournier’s gangrene before treatment.

During physical examination, his temperature was recorded as being at 39.5°C along with high heart rate of 110 bpm and blood pressure reading of160/100 mmHg.. The patient’s dark discoloration in the perineum region indicated tissue necrosis while he had leukocytosis demonstrated via higher-than-normal white cell count results after undergoing blood tests to combats it’s elevated glucose levels & kidney functionality were impaired too. An abdomino-pelvic CT scan confirmed that Fournier’s gangrene - an extensive infection within subcutaneous tissues- is present considering he shows signs which required him to undergo prompt intravenous broad-spectrum antibiotics followed by surgical debridement [Figure 2] so as to remove dead or infected issues effectively then received nutritional support right away.

Figure 2: Fournier’s gangrene after surgical debridement

Despite receiving such aggressive treatments however there were renal complications alongside requirement post multiple procedural intervention ensued thereafter during prolonged hospitalization weeks before gradual improvement finally occurred although long term management remain necessary towards averting future diabetes-related complication occurrences .

Obesity, chronic alcoholism, hypertension, congestive heart failure and immunosuppression are common risk factors for Fournier’s gangrene [6]. Additionally, patients with diabetes mellitus may be at greater risk due to small vessel disease and defective neuropathy; estimates suggest that between 36- 56% of affected individuals have this condition [6]. This rare but severe complication is often seen in those with a BMI over 30 [7]. Predisposing sources include colorectal infections or perforations as well as urologic conditions like neurogenic bladder or Bartholin’s gland abscesses - especially following hysterectomy in women. Mortality rates range from around 20-40%, though sepsis can greatly increase this figure (up to 70-80%). Timely treatment can reduce the mortality rate below even 10%.Fever, purulent collection, and sepsis are common presentations among patients with Fournier’s gangrene. Local discomfort is also reported by many of these individuals. A physical examination can confirm the diagnosis [8]. Other conditions that may be considered as possible differentials include cellulitis, herpes infection, scrotal abscesses, and orchitis [9]. In cases where a definitive diagnosis cannot be made through clinical evaluation alone or when uncertainty regarding disease extent arises, imaging studies such as ultrasonography., X-rays,and magnetic resonance could prove helpful diagnostic tools[9]. Radiological evaluations provide useful information concerning multiple aspects of FG; for example,the extent to which this necrotizing soft tissue condition has developed in an affected patient’s body.The careful interpretation of radiographic findings related to hyperlucency discerning gas within tissues plays some role,but it fares less well at detecting deep fascial air than methods like ultrasound.In certain circumstances,testicular involvement along with scrotal contents may require additional diagnostic intervention beyond merely visual inspection [10,11]. Magnetic Resonance Imaging re-evaluations assess infected areas considers pathology comprehensively.Although its application rates remain limited on those few occasions clearly exhibiting unclearly emerging characteristics. The most frequent microbial pathogen associated with Fournier’s gangrene infections caused directly across species towards humans belong mainly to Escherichia Coli .Nevertheless,Klebsiella,Pseudomonas. Enterococcus Streptococcus Aureus, “aureus.”can still appear –. It causes development because dozens form bacterial suspensions each requiring anaerobic fermentative milieu that creates production following mechanisms: collagenase,stretokinase,pro moting rapid spread throughout sick organisms.Significantly,this process occurs regardless if other contributing factors including platelet aggregation strength inhabitant phagocytes ever inhibit growth.FG progresses from localized immune systems failure ending in ischemia and ultimately necrosis of otherwise healthy tissue,depending on a variety of microbiological factors [12]. The spread of the infection usually starts from superficial areas such as Colles fascia and reaches deeper layers in the perineum. Those with severe symptoms may experience foul-smelling drainage, pain around the anus, purulent discharge from their perineal area, and fever. These critical conditions can cause a rapid deterioration leading to sepsis or multi-organ failure - which is also one of the most common reasons for death among patients suffering from this illness [13]. Immediate resuscitation is crucial for critically ill patients with Fournier’s gangrene. Administering broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics and correcting electrolyte imbalances through fluid therapy are critical steps that should be taken immediately [14]. The recommended antibiotics include gentamicin, clindamycin and either ampicillin plus sulbactam or a third-generation cephalosporin to combat aerobic, anaerobic, Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. In case of fungal infections consideration must be given to fluconazole, vancomycin or piperacillin-tazobactam [15]. It’s essential to continue the antibiotic treatment until stability improves in the patient; tissue samples ought to also provide information about culture sensitivity targeting further treatments involved specifically towards individual cases.

Surgery is the primary treatment for Fournier’s gangrene, and immediate debridement should be performed within 12 hours of admission. The procedure involves removing all nonviable tissue until bleeding skin margins are reached, followed by rinsing with saline solution and stopping any blood flow accurately. Exposed tissues must be covered in frequently replaced gauze soaked in saline to ensure cleanliness before reconstructive procedures can take place using VAC systems which contributes significantly towards reducing overall cost as well as hospital stay duration. 

However, hyperbaric oxygen therapy cannot always treat infected wounds combined with dressing changes where required; this was impossible due to severe cardiac health conditions affecting the patient at hand. Additional surgeries such as colostomy or cystotomy may also need consideration depending on how extensive the disease has progressed but clear guidance regarding these procedures could not find found easily through existing literature sources. Evidence suggests that diverting fecal matter from entering open wound areas might prevent further contamination allowing quicker healing times-while contentious surgeons’ opinions ultimately dictate what approach shall apply based upon multiple variables involved during decision-making processes involving patients undergoing interventions under their care level best suited for treating individual cases effectively without compromising medical outcomes long term prognosis positively impacted given proper handling throughout complex course treatments necessary mitigating risks posed by infections associated fibrinogen degradation product development often present experience Forward Mortality underlying condition disappearance silently represents grave threat immediate post-treatment phases recovery chance mortality statistically higher among older individuals preexisting comorbidities neglected symptoms accompanied suffering initially caused concern over unaddressed underlying disorders posing risk life threatening complications down line making timely intervention paramount importance achieving optimal desired clinical outcomes early appropriately started surgical management constitutes mainstay therapeutic options selected uncanny efficacy performance proven safe time-tested augmentation chosen wise decisions practitioners qualified appropriate degrees training licensure entities governing healthcare services provided optimally delivered safely administered remaining vigilant following recommended guidelines expert professionals urged act promptly when pathologies emerge catch diagnoses violations resolve immediately put rest achieve manageable level care inflammation contained facilitating more effective wound management preventing escalation seriously infectious conditions flourish unchecked. 

The treatment of Fournier’s gangrene involves a combination of medical and surgical intervention, and it remains an urgent matter. This case report documents a perineal and perianal necrotizing fasciitis that occurred as a complication in patients with diabetes mellitus. Given the severity of this disease, colostomy has been used to treat similar cases in our experience; however, effective results were achieved through combined therapy involving surgical debridement alongside antibiotics infusion. It is essential to apply prompt multimodal measures like intravenous fluid support along with antibiotic treatment for better metabolic correction coupled with aggressive surgery if there are any chances for successful outcomes.

1. Althunayyan S, Karamitosos E. Fournier’s gangrene in an obese female in third trimester of pregnancy. Saudi Med J. 2018; 39: 415- 418.
2. Fournier JA. Jean-Alfred Founier 1832-1914. Gangrene foudroyante de la verge. Sem Med 1833. Dis Colon Rectum. 1988; 31: 589-597.
3. Hagedorn J C, Wessells H. A contemporary update of Fournier’s gangrene. Nat Rev Urol. 2007; 14: 205-214.
4. Eke N. Fournier’s gangrene: A review of 1726 cases. Br J Surg. 2008; 87: 718-728.
5. Agha RA, Borrelli MR, Farwana R, Koshy K, Fowler AJ, Orgill DP, SCARE Group. The SCARE 2018 statemen:Updating consensus surgical Case Report (SCARE) guidelines. Int J Surg. 2018; 60: 132-136.
6. Sorensen MD, John N Krieger, Frederick P Rivara, Joshua A Broghammer, Matthew B Klein, Christopher D Mack, et al. Fournier’s Gangrene: population based epidemiology and outcomes. J Urol. 2009; 181: 2120-2126.
7. Czymek R, Hildebrand P, Kleemann M, Roblick U, Hoffmann M, Jungbluth T et al. New insights into the epidemiology and etiology of Fourniers gangrene: A review of 33 patients. Infection. 2009; 37: 306-331.
8. Yucel M, Ozpek A, Ba?ak F, K?l?c A, Unal E, Yuksekda? S, et al. Fournier’s gangrene: A retrospective analysis of 25 patients. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2017; 23: 400-404.
9. Bakshi C, Banavali S, Lokeshwar N, Prasad R, Advani S. Clustering of Fournier (male genital) gangrene cases in a pediatric cancer ward. Med Pediatr Oncol. 2018; 41: 472-474.
10. Voelzke BB, Hagedorn JC. Presentation and Diagnosis of Fournier Gangrene. Urology. 2018; 114: 8-13.
11. Levenson RB, Singh AK, Novelline RA. Fournier gangrene: role of imaging. Radiographics. 2008; 28: 519-528.
12. Fatih Yanaral, Can Balci, Faruk Ozgor, Abdulmuttalip Simsek, Ozkan Onuk, Muammer Aydin, et al. Comparison of conventional dressings and vacuum-assisted closure in the wound therapy of Fournier’s gangrene. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2017; 89: 208-211.
13. Sutherland M, Meyer AA. Necrotizing soft-tissue infections. Surg Clin North Am. 1994; 74: 591-607.
14. Kathryn S. Norton, Lester W Johnson, Travis Perry, Katina H Perry, James K Sehon, Gazi B Zibari. Management of Fournier’s gangrene: an eleven year retrospective analysis of early recognition, diagnosis, and treatment. Am Surg. 2002; 68: 709-713.
15. Marc A Bjurlin, Thomas O’Grady, Dae Y Kim, Naveen Divakaruni, Andrew Drago, Jennifer Blumetti, et al. Causative pathogens, antibiotic sensitivity, resistance patterns, and severity in a contemporary series of Fournier’s gangrene. Urology. 2013; 81: 752-758.