Loading

Journal of Veterinary Medicine and Research

Carbon Accounting May Mislead Decisions of Beef Cattle Consumers

Short Communication | Open Access | Volume 9 | Issue 1

  • 1. National Council of Investigators Científicas and Tecnicas, Institutes of Ciencias of Tierra and Ambientales of La Pampa, Mendoza 109, L6302EPA, Santa Rosa, La Pampa, Argentina
  • 2. GPS Group Países Productores del Sur, Billinghurst 2564-4° floor, C1425DTZ Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • 3. Austral University, Paraguay 1950, S2000FZF Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina
  • 4. Faculty of Exact and Natural Sciences, National University of La Pampa, Argentina
+ Show More - Show Less
Corresponding Authors
Ernesto Viglizzo, National Council of Investigators Científicas and Tecnicas, Institutes of Ciencias of Tierra and Ambientales of La Pampa, Mendoza 109, L6302EPA, Santa Rosa, La Pampa, Colombato 1626, Argentina, Tel: 549-2954-609-506; Email: eviglizzo@gmail.com
ABSTRACT

The conflictive relationship between livestock production and global climate change is influencing decisions about the consumption of meat and milk products in high-income and well-informed societies. As a result, there is a growing concern within the livestock-business community. The debate arose still unanswered questions about approaches and methods used to assess livestock emissions -in particular cattle emissions- and their impact on the global environment. The Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methods on the one hand and the Inventories methods (IM) on the other hand, release magnitudes of C emission that strongly differ from each other. The LCA is an analytical approach that accumulates on each ton of beef production the emissions occurring at the farm level and adds the emissions from sectors located in pre- and post-farm stages. In the case of IM, the method only computes on-farm methane and nitrous oxide emissions-expressed as ton C annually emitted/land unit-without accounting emissions from sectors out of cattle production. Based on IM, recent FAO statistics regarding all livestock species, cattle and crops show that the contribution of cattle to global emissions was less than 5%, far from the 14.5% to 18% estimated through LCA by two influential former FAO reports. Considering the debate on the use of alternative approaches is still alive and can modify the consumer’s opinion and influence beef trade, communication strategies need to rely on objective information that shows results from different scientific insights.

ABSTRACT

The conflictive relationship between livestock production and global climate change is influencing decisions about the consumption of meat and milk products in high-income and well-informed societies. As a result, there is a growing concern within the livestock-business community. The debate arose still unanswered questions about approaches and methods used to assess livestock emissions -in particular cattle emissions- and their impact on the global environment. The Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methods on the one hand and the Inventories methods (IM) on the other hand, release magnitudes of C emission that strongly differ from each other. The LCA is an analytical approach that accumulates on each ton of beef production the emissions occurring at the farm level and adds the emissions from sectors located in pre- and post-farm stages. In the case of IM, the method only computes on-farm methane and nitrous oxide emissions-expressed as ton C annually emitted/land unit-without accounting emissions from sectors out of cattle production. Based on IM, recent FAO statistics regarding all livestock species, cattle and crops show that the contribution of cattle to global emissions was less than 5%, far from the 14.5% to 18% estimated through LCA by two influential former FAO reports. Considering the debate on the use of alternative approaches is still alive and can modify the consumer’s opinion and influence beef trade, communication strategies need to rely on objective information that shows results from different scientific insights.

KEYWORDS
  • Beef production
  • Carbon emissions
  • LCA method
  • inventory method
  • Consumers’ behavior 

 

CITATION

 Viglizzo E, Ricard F (2022) Carbon Accounting May Mislead Decisions of Beef Cattle Consumers. J Vet Med Res 9(1): 1226.

ABBREVIATIONS

LCA: Life Cycle Assessment, IM: Inventory Method

INTRODUCTION

An influential report entitled Livestock Long Shadow, published in 2006 by the FAO´s Animal Production and Health Division [1], had considerable impact on meat consumers and raised concern within the livestock business community. Beyond the biogenic emissions of methane and nitrous oxide typical of livestock production activities, the report also accounted for other sources of carbon (C) emission. Thus waste ponds, manufacturing and application of fertilizers and pesticides for cropping animal feeds, on-farm use of fossil fuels, land conversion due to livestock expansion, organic matter losses in cultivated soils, land desertification caused by overgrazing and various post-farm processes such as those of processing, packaging, transporting, retailing and so on were included in the analysis. The authors concluded that “The livestock sector … globally is one of the largest sources of greenhouse gases (carbon) emissions…”, explaining “… about 18% of the global warming effect…”.

A later FAO’s report [2], entitled Tackling Climate Change through Livestock toned down the controversy. By revisiting available management practices to reduce emissions, the authors calculated that the contribution of livestock to global emissions was about 14.5%. Since then different approaches, methods and metrics to account for carbon emissions received increased attention.

Beyond the outstanding influence of both reports on public opinion, a debate arose about the approach and the methods that authors have used to estimate livestock emissions -in particular cattle emissions- and their global impact.

Here we propose to discuss how the use of different approaches and methods to estimate emissions in cattle can affect the behavior of well-informed consumers with high purchasing power.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Relying on a conventional Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) approach the above-mentioned FAO reports based their calculations on IPCC guidelines, and the last one [2] introduced a computational tool [3] suitable for global assessment. The LCA is an analytical approach to assess the environmental impact at all the stages of a product’s life. The C footprint, expressed as the amount of C emitted per unit of product, is a quantitative measure that results from applying LCA. It may be disaggregated in different life stages, from the manufacturing of raw materials to primary production (“from cradle to the farm-gate”), or by summing the extra impact of transporting, processing, retailing and domestic waste (“from cradle to the grave”) of food products.

Following the LCA approach, a relevant global research  compared the C footprint of 40 food products by measuring carbon emissions per 100 g protein production. Based on five environmental indicators, the authors surveyed the overwhelming amount of 38,700 farms in 119 countries, as well as 1600 post-farm activities. Typically, emissions from animal products (beef and other meats, eggs, dairy) contributed 56- 58% of total food emissions, exceeding in the case of beef many times those of the plant-based products. Looking for reducing emissions from animal products, the authors wonder if it would be more effective to manipulate the production process, or simply to discourage the consumer demand. They predicted a reduction of about 49 % in C emissions by moving to a diet that excludes animal products, suggesting that the price should reflect C load of food through environmental labels, taxes or subsidies.

Although its predominance in developed countries, some critics warn that the C footprint does not adequately reflect emissions from the livestock sector. People in the food business consider that charging animal products with the emissions from other sectors (e.g., input manufacturers, transporters, processors, etc.) may biased the consumer´s perception and cause commercial damage, in particular in the case of the beef industry. As an option, they propose to inventory only those emissions of methane and nitrous oxide, which are all biogenic emissions strictly attributable to cattle production activities.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Results may drastically change if calculations follow the way of inventorying only methane and nitrous oxide emissions in cattle, without accounting emissions from sectors out of cattle production. Based on the IPCC [4], recent FAO statistics [5], regarding all livestock species, cattle and crops show that the contribution of cattle to global emissions may be less than 5%, far from the 14.5% to 18% estimated by Stanfield et al. [1] and Gerber et al. [2] in former FAO reports. Furthermore, given the increasing share of fossil fuels since the 1990s, the contribution of livestock and crop products to global emissions seems to show a consistent downward trend (Figure 1). These data simply demonstrate the decreasing influence of agricultural activities on global emissions and the limited foundation of some alarms regarding the potential impact of cattle production on global warming.

The evidence indicates that the debate about alternative approaches and methods to assess carbon emissions in the beef industry is far from clear and deserves further investigation (Figure 1).

Figure 1 Electrospun nanofibers membrane of poly-?-caprolactone visualization after 21 days of human Osteoblasts culture (Cells visualization in blue (nucleus /DAPI) and PLLFITC labelled nanofibers in green): colonization and proliferation of osteoblasts into the nanofibers membrane.

Figure 1 Electrospun nanofibers membrane of poly-ε-caprolactone visualization after 21 days of human Osteoblasts culture (Cells visualization in blue (nucleus /DAPI) and PLLFITC labelled nanofibers in green): colonization and proliferation of osteoblasts into the nanofibers membrane.

CONCLUSION

No method for accounting for carbon appears to be better than another for assessing emissions in the beef industry. They simply reflect different ways of evaluating a single common problem. This debate is open and requires sound arguments to support alternative points of view. Considering that the outcome of alternative approaches has the potential to modify the public opinion and the consumer´s perception, with implications on trade relationships as well, differences among them require a more careful analysis and communication. In times of increasing environmental concern, looking at the same problem from different insights help consumers to get a more complete picture of reality, strengthen their critical judgment and improve their decisions.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We acknowledge the silent contribution of some colleagues that supported this manuscript with valuable and sensible opinions.

Viglizzo E, Ricard F (2022) Carbon Accounting May Mislead Decisions of Beef Cattle Consumers. J Vet Med Res 9(1): 1226.

Received : 12 Apr 2022
Accepted : 03 May 2022
Published : 05 May 2022
Journals
Annals of Otolaryngology and Rhinology
ISSN : 2379-948X
Launched : 2014
JSM Schizophrenia
Launched : 2016
Journal of Nausea
Launched : 2020
JSM Internal Medicine
Launched : 2016
JSM Hepatitis
Launched : 2016
JSM Oro Facial Surgeries
ISSN : 2578-3211
Launched : 2016
Journal of Human Nutrition and Food Science
ISSN : 2333-6706
Launched : 2013
JSM Regenerative Medicine and Bioengineering
ISSN : 2379-0490
Launched : 2013
JSM Spine
ISSN : 2578-3181
Launched : 2016
Archives of Palliative Care
ISSN : 2573-1165
Launched : 2016
JSM Nutritional Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3203
Launched : 2017
Annals of Neurodegenerative Disorders
ISSN : 2476-2032
Launched : 2016
Journal of Fever
ISSN : 2641-7782
Launched : 2017
JSM Bone Marrow Research
ISSN : 2578-3351
Launched : 2016
JSM Mathematics and Statistics
ISSN : 2578-3173
Launched : 2014
Journal of Autoimmunity and Research
ISSN : 2573-1173
Launched : 2014
JSM Arthritis
ISSN : 2475-9155
Launched : 2016
JSM Head and Neck Cancer-Cases and Reviews
ISSN : 2573-1610
Launched : 2016
JSM General Surgery Cases and Images
ISSN : 2573-1564
Launched : 2016
JSM Anatomy and Physiology
ISSN : 2573-1262
Launched : 2016
JSM Dental Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1548
Launched : 2016
Annals of Emergency Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1017
Launched : 2016
Annals of Mens Health and Wellness
ISSN : 2641-7707
Launched : 2017
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Health Care
ISSN : 2576-0084
Launched : 2018
Journal of Chronic Diseases and Management
ISSN : 2573-1300
Launched : 2016
Annals of Vaccines and Immunization
ISSN : 2378-9379
Launched : 2014
JSM Heart Surgery Cases and Images
ISSN : 2578-3157
Launched : 2016
Annals of Reproductive Medicine and Treatment
ISSN : 2573-1092
Launched : 2016
JSM Brain Science
ISSN : 2573-1289
Launched : 2016
JSM Biomarkers
ISSN : 2578-3815
Launched : 2014
JSM Biology
ISSN : 2475-9392
Launched : 2016
Archives of Stem Cell and Research
ISSN : 2578-3580
Launched : 2014
Annals of Clinical and Medical Microbiology
ISSN : 2578-3629
Launched : 2014
JSM Pediatric Surgery
ISSN : 2578-3149
Launched : 2017
Journal of Memory Disorder and Rehabilitation
ISSN : 2578-319X
Launched : 2016
JSM Tropical Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2578-3165
Launched : 2016
JSM Head and Face Medicine
ISSN : 2578-3793
Launched : 2016
JSM Cardiothoracic Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1297
Launched : 2016
JSM Bone and Joint Diseases
ISSN : 2578-3351
Launched : 2017
JSM Bioavailability and Bioequivalence
ISSN : 2641-7812
Launched : 2017
JSM Atherosclerosis
ISSN : 2573-1270
Launched : 2016
Journal of Genitourinary Disorders
ISSN : 2641-7790
Launched : 2017
Journal of Fractures and Sprains
ISSN : 2578-3831
Launched : 2016
Journal of Autism and Epilepsy
ISSN : 2641-7774
Launched : 2016
Annals of Marine Biology and Research
ISSN : 2573-105X
Launched : 2014
JSM Health Education & Primary Health Care
ISSN : 2578-3777
Launched : 2016
JSM Communication Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3807
Launched : 2016
Annals of Musculoskeletal Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3599
Launched : 2016
Annals of Virology and Research
ISSN : 2573-1122
Launched : 2014
JSM Renal Medicine
ISSN : 2573-1637
Launched : 2016
Journal of Muscle Health
ISSN : 2578-3823
Launched : 2016
JSM Genetics and Genomics
ISSN : 2334-1823
Launched : 2013
JSM Anxiety and Depression
ISSN : 2475-9139
Launched : 2016
Clinical Journal of Heart Diseases
ISSN : 2641-7766
Launched : 2016
Annals of Medicinal Chemistry and Research
ISSN : 2378-9336
Launched : 2014
JSM Pain and Management
ISSN : 2578-3378
Launched : 2016
JSM Women's Health
ISSN : 2578-3696
Launched : 2016
Clinical Research in HIV or AIDS
ISSN : 2374-0094
Launched : 2013
Journal of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Obesity
ISSN : 2333-6692
Launched : 2013
Journal of Substance Abuse and Alcoholism
ISSN : 2373-9363
Launched : 2013
JSM Neurosurgery and Spine
ISSN : 2373-9479
Launched : 2013
Journal of Liver and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2379-0830
Launched : 2014
Journal of Drug Design and Research
ISSN : 2379-089X
Launched : 2014
JSM Clinical Oncology and Research
ISSN : 2373-938X
Launched : 2013
JSM Bioinformatics, Genomics and Proteomics
ISSN : 2576-1102
Launched : 2014
JSM Chemistry
ISSN : 2334-1831
Launched : 2013
Journal of Trauma and Care
ISSN : 2573-1246
Launched : 2014
JSM Surgical Oncology and Research
ISSN : 2578-3688
Launched : 2016
Annals of Food Processing and Preservation
ISSN : 2573-1033
Launched : 2016
Journal of Radiology and Radiation Therapy
ISSN : 2333-7095
Launched : 2013
JSM Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
ISSN : 2578-3572
Launched : 2016
Annals of Clinical Pathology
ISSN : 2373-9282
Launched : 2013
Annals of Cardiovascular Diseases
ISSN : 2641-7731
Launched : 2016
Journal of Behavior
ISSN : 2576-0076
Launched : 2016
Annals of Clinical and Experimental Metabolism
ISSN : 2572-2492
Launched : 2016
Clinical Research in Infectious Diseases
ISSN : 2379-0636
Launched : 2013
JSM Microbiology
ISSN : 2333-6455
Launched : 2013
Journal of Urology and Research
ISSN : 2379-951X
Launched : 2014
Journal of Family Medicine and Community Health
ISSN : 2379-0547
Launched : 2013
Annals of Pregnancy and Care
ISSN : 2578-336X
Launched : 2017
JSM Cell and Developmental Biology
ISSN : 2379-061X
Launched : 2013
Annals of Aquaculture and Research
ISSN : 2379-0881
Launched : 2014
Clinical Research in Pulmonology
ISSN : 2333-6625
Launched : 2013
Journal of Immunology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2333-6714
Launched : 2013
Annals of Forensic Research and Analysis
ISSN : 2378-9476
Launched : 2014
JSM Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
ISSN : 2333-7109
Launched : 2013
Annals of Breast Cancer Research
ISSN : 2641-7685
Launched : 2016
Annals of Gerontology and Geriatric Research
ISSN : 2378-9409
Launched : 2014
Journal of Sleep Medicine and Disorders
ISSN : 2379-0822
Launched : 2014
JSM Burns and Trauma
ISSN : 2475-9406
Launched : 2016
Chemical Engineering and Process Techniques
ISSN : 2333-6633
Launched : 2013
Annals of Clinical Cytology and Pathology
ISSN : 2475-9430
Launched : 2014
JSM Allergy and Asthma
ISSN : 2573-1254
Launched : 2016
Journal of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
ISSN : 2334-2307
Launched : 2013
Annals of Sports Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2379-0571
Launched : 2014
JSM Sexual Medicine
ISSN : 2578-3718
Launched : 2016
Annals of Vascular Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2378-9344
Launched : 2014
JSM Biotechnology and Biomedical Engineering
ISSN : 2333-7117
Launched : 2013
Journal of Hematology and Transfusion
ISSN : 2333-6684
Launched : 2013
JSM Environmental Science and Ecology
ISSN : 2333-7141
Launched : 2013
Journal of Cardiology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2333-6676
Launched : 2013
JSM Nanotechnology and Nanomedicine
ISSN : 2334-1815
Launched : 2013
Journal of Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders
ISSN : 2475-9473
Launched : 2016
JSM Ophthalmology
ISSN : 2333-6447
Launched : 2013
Journal of Pharmacology and Clinical Toxicology
ISSN : 2333-7079
Launched : 2013
Annals of Psychiatry and Mental Health
ISSN : 2374-0124
Launched : 2013
Medical Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
ISSN : 2333-6439
Launched : 2013
Annals of Pediatrics and Child Health
ISSN : 2373-9312
Launched : 2013
JSM Clinical Pharmaceutics
ISSN : 2379-9498
Launched : 2014
JSM Foot and Ankle
ISSN : 2475-9112
Launched : 2016
JSM Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementia
ISSN : 2378-9565
Launched : 2014
Journal of Addiction Medicine and Therapy
ISSN : 2333-665X
Launched : 2013
Annals of Public Health and Research
ISSN : 2378-9328
Launched : 2014
Annals of Orthopedics and Rheumatology
ISSN : 2373-9290
Launched : 2013
Journal of Clinical Nephrology and Research
ISSN : 2379-0652
Launched : 2014
Annals of Community Medicine and Practice
ISSN : 2475-9465
Launched : 2014
Annals of Biometrics and Biostatistics
ISSN : 2374-0116
Launched : 2013
JSM Clinical Case Reports
ISSN : 2373-9819
Launched : 2013
Journal of Cancer Biology and Research
ISSN : 2373-9436
Launched : 2013
Journal of Surgery and Transplantation Science
ISSN : 2379-0911
Launched : 2013
Journal of Dermatology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2373-9371
Launched : 2013
JSM Gastroenterology and Hepatology
ISSN : 2373-9487
Launched : 2013
Annals of Nursing and Practice
ISSN : 2379-9501
Launched : 2014
JSM Dentistry
ISSN : 2333-7133
Launched : 2013
Author Information X