Loading

Journal of Veterinary Medicine and Research

Identifying the Shedding Patterns of Wildlife Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Experimentally Inoculated Neonatal Jersey Calves

Research Article | Open Access | Volume 7 | Issue 2

  • 1. Department of Population Health and Reproduction, University of California, USA
  • 2. Western Institute for Food Safety and Security, University of California, USA
  • 3. College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Wyoming, University, USA
  • 4. Western Center for Food Safety, University of California, USA
+ Show More - Show Less
Corresponding Authors
Edward R Atwill, Department of Population Health and Reproduction, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA, USA 95616; Tel:53075421
ABSTRACT

Cattle are considered to be a major reservoir host of Shiga-toxin producing enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7. Contaminated foods of bovine origin that have been exposed to bovine or wildlife E. coli O157:H7 isolates are important vehicles of human infections, which can lead to the deadly hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS). The objective of this study was to determine possible dose-dependent pathogen shedding patterns of a wildlife E. coli O157:H7 strain in neonatal calves. We inoculated six calves, 1-2 day old calves, with either 108 or 109 CFU and collected fecal samples for 11 days post-inoculation to determine the shedding patterns of the inoculated E. coli O157:H7. Calves were then euthanized, with tissues collected for culture. One calf inoculated at 108 CFU and both calves inoculated at 109 CFU became infected. The calf inoculated at 109 CFU, which shed the E. coli O157:H7 isolate for the entire 11 days post-inoculation, had a wider distribution of colonized tissues compared to the other 109 CFU and 108 CFU inoculated calves. We conclude that the wildlife strain has a dose-dependent shedding pattern with a calculated infectious dose (ID50) of 108 CFU.

CITATION

Li X, Antaki Zukoski EM, Nguyen THB, Hoar BR, Jay Russell MT, et al. (2020) Identifying the Shedding Patterns of Wildlife Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Experimentally Inoculated Neonatal Jersey Calves. J Vet Med Res 7(2): 1183.

KEYWORDS

•    Escherichia coli O157:H7
•    Wildlife
•    Calves
•    Neonatal
•    Dose-dependent 

ABBREVIATIONS

EHEC: Enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli; E. coli O157:H7: Escherichia coli O157:H7; Stxs: Shiga toxins; HUS: Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome; A/E: Attaching/Effacing; ID50: 50% Infectious Dose; BHI: Brain Heat Infusion; PBS: Phosphate Buffered Saline; LB: Luria Base; eaeA: Intimin; HlyA: Hemolysin A; IACUC: Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee; TRACS: Teaching and Research Animal Care Services; RAMS: Rectoanal Mucosal Swabs; TSB: Tryptic Soy Broth; IMS: Immunomagnetic Separation; PFGE: Pulsed Field Gel Electrophoresis

INTRODUCTION

Escherichia coli are a Gram-negative, rod-shaped bacterium of the Enterobacteriaceae family. Most E. coli strains colonize the gastrointestinal tract of humans and mammals as part of the normal flora. However, some can evolve into pathogenic strains by acquiring virulence factors through plasmids, transposons, bacteriophages, and/or pathogenicity islands. These pathogenic E. coli are characterized by serogroups, pathogenicity mechanisms, clinical symptoms, or virulence factors [1,2]. One major pathogenic group of E. coli strains are the enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC), which can produce Shiga toxins (Stxs) and cause non-specific diarrhea, hemorrhagic colitis, and potentially life-threatening hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) in humans. The occurrence of massive outbreaks of Shiga toxin-producing E. coli infections, especially resulting from the serotype O157:H7 and the risk of developing HUS (the primary cause of acute kidney failure in children in many developed countries) make this pathogen a public health problem of serious concern [3]. Sources of human infection include contaminated foods, primarily ground beef, raw milk, lettuce, spinach, and fresh fruits, as well as waterborne transmission in rural areas through contact with feces from infected animals [4,5].

The natural reservoir of E. coli O157:H7 is in the intestinal tracts of animals, particularly cattle and small domesticated ruminants, like sheep and possibly goats. It can also be carried by pigs, poultry, other domestic farm animals, birds, insects, and wildlife, such as rodents and white-tailed deer. Prevalence within wildlife carriers can be low, but can provide a resource for transmission within local areas and distant geographic locations [6-8]. Ferens and Hovde, 2011, found E. coli O157:H7 in 11.4% of cattle (n=1407), 1.2% of swine (n=1102), 3.6% of sheep and goats (n=364), and in 5.2% of 154 fly pools, where some isolates from cattle, swine, and flies shared indistinguishable subtypes of the bacteria. In another study, 1,071 wild rodents were trapped from October 2009 to August 2011 in the Salinas Valley region to determine the fecal prevalence and risk factors associated with the occurrence of E. coli O157:H7, Salmonella spp., Cryptosporidium spp., and Giardia spp. within agricultural production systems. It was determined that 0.2% of the fecal samples collected from the wild rodents were positive for E. coli O157:H7 [9].

There has been extensive work using animal models to better understand the dynamic pathogenic mechanisms of EHEC, especially with regards to serotype O157:H7. It has been shown that neonatal animals, especially calves, are the susceptible age class for these types of diseases and symptoms, which include diarrhea, hyperemia, fibrinous exudates, enteritis, and the formation of attaching/effacing (A/E) lesions within the intestinal tissues. In contrast, older ruminants have transient watery diarrhea, but are not seriously affected by an E. coli O157:H7 infection. It is thought that E. coli O157:H7 primarily colonizes the rectoanal junction in cattle, which is then responsible for the persistent shedding pattern. The capacity for persistence with episodic shedding has been seen in studies, but there also can be a significant detection problem since the infected animals can be asymptomatic [10-13].

To reduce the risk of E. coli O157:H7 transmission from animals to humans, it’s necessary to determine if the bacterium’s pathogenesis differs among various wildlife strains. Here, we examined the shedding patterns among neonatal Jersey calves inoculated with a wildlife E. coli O157:H7 strain isolated from an agricultural production system. Our objective was to determine dose-dependent characteristics in the host clinical response correlated with isolation in daily fecal excretion and tissue-based cultures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Standard growth curve of bacterial strain

The wildlife Escherichia coli O157:H7 strain was isolated from a deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus) November 2009 in Monterey County, CA on a spinach produce ranch. Three growth curves were made by incubating a bead of stock inoculum, taken from -80°C frozen banks (Pro-lab, Richmond Hill, Ohio, USA), in 150mL of brain heart infusion, BHI (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, USA) broth. Each broth was incubated, plated, and original concentrations were calculated as previously described by Antaki-Zukoski et al., 2018 [14]. The E. coli O157:H7 strain was also evaluated for both Shiga toxins, intimin (eaeA), and hemolysin A (HlyA) virulence genes using an endpoint analysis (Eppendorf, Hauppauge, New York, USA) according to the PCR protocol [3] (data not shown).

Ethics statement

All animal experiments were conducted under the approval by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at the University of California Davis Animal Care and Use program (AUP #15459). Experimental procedures followed the federal guidelines outlined in the “Animal Welfare Act” and “Health Research Extension Act”, where personal protective equipment, standard operating protocols, daily cleaning/observation/animal enrichment, and sedation/euthanasia/necropsy methods were described in detail for the review and approval by the committee.

Animal experiments

Six male calves 1-2-days-old that had received colostrum were purchased from an approved dairy. Each calf was housed individually in the biosafety level-II animal facility at the Teaching and Research Animal Care Services (TRACS). The calves were fed commercial milk replacer without antibiotics twice a day and given free access to water. Bedding material was removed while pens were bleached and rinsed daily, to ensure fresh fecal collection. Upon arrival, each calf was deemed healthy by clinical examination and hematological analysis with a serum chemistry panel and complete blood count. Additionally, each calf was tested for the presence of Cryptosporidium spp. with an acid-fast stain performed on feces. In order to confirm that calves were not colonized with E .coli O157:H7, fresh rectal fecal samples and rectoanal mucosal swabs (RAMS) were collected for three consecutive days prior to inoculation with the wildlife E. coli O157:H7 [15]. Ten grams of each fecal sample was measured into 90mL of Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, USA), while the RAMS were placed in 50mL of TSB. The samples were incubated at 25°C for 2 hours, 42°C for 8 hours followed by immunomagnetic separation (IMS) using anti-O157 antibodies (Dynal Inc, Camarillo, California, USA) and cultured on MacConkey agar with sorbitol, cefixime, and potassium tellurite (Becton, Dickinson, Co, Sparks, Maryland, USA), and Rainbow agar (Biolog, Hayward, California, USA) for the presence of E. coli O157:H7 [14]. If any colonies were considered E. coli O157 suspects, traditional PCR was performed using a set of specific primers to detect O-antigen-encoding rfb regions of E. coli O157:H7 [3]. Once the calves were confirmed negative for Cryptosporidium spp. and E. coli O157H7 prior infections, they were placed in individual pens, separated by one pen length. They were then assigned an E. coli O157:H7 inoculum dose.

Inoculation of animals

One micro bank bead for the wildlife strain, stored at -80°C, was placed in a 250mL flask containing 150mL of BHI. The flasks were incubated at 37°C for 6 hours, while shaking at 100 rpm. Once the determined optical density was reached, the flasks were placed on ice for 15 minutes. At this point the optical density was measured again and the concentration of the stock solution was calculated by using the growth curve from the E. coli O157:H7 strain. From the known stock solution concentration, the inoculums were prepared for the wildlife E. coli O157:H7 strain in 200mL of PBS.

In previous lab studies inoculating neonatal calves with wildlife E. coli O157:H7 strain isolated from a feral swine, at 104 CFU and 107 CFU showed that these inoculum doses were not high enough to cause an infection (data below). To ensure the feral swine and deer mouse strains were distinct from one another and from other E. coli O157:H7 isolates collected in California, a Pulsed Field Gel Electrophoresis (PFGE) was performed. The isolates were digested using the Center for Disease Control and Prevention PulseNet PFGE with XbaI restriction enzyme [16]. A dendogram was constructed by analyzing each digest profile with band matching and phylogenetic clustering analysis methods in Gel ComparII (Applied Maths, Sint-Martens-Laterm, Belgium) computer software. For this study, assuming that the two wildlife E. coli O157:H7 strains have similar pathogenicity patterns once inoculated into a host, one calf served as a negative control, two calves were inoculated with 108 CFU (calf A and calf B), two calves were inoculated with 109 CFU (calf A and calf B), and one calf was inoculated with 1010 CFU (positive control) of the deer mouse wildlife E. coli O157:H7 strain. Serial dilutions from 10-1 to 10-10 were made in 9mL of PBS and plated in triplicate on LB for each stock solution and inoculum. After an overnight incubation at 37° C, the true concentration of each inoculum was calculated. The individually housed calves were intragastrically inoculated with their assigned inoculum dose in 200 ml PBS with a calf gastric feeder (VetOne, Boise, Idaho, USA) followed with another 200mL of PBS as a wash.

Daily sampling and fecal scoring

Fecal samples and RAMS were collected twice daily for the first two days post-inoculation (p.i.) and then collected once a day until the 11th day p.i. Fecal consistency was scored on a scale from 1-4, with 1=Normal, 2=Paste, 3=Liquid, and 4=Water (Table 1). All of the samples were collected in the afternoon and transported back to the laboratory in a refrigerated state. The samples were processed within 24 hours of sampling.

Analytical assays for detecting E. coli O157:H7

Each 10g fecal sample and RAMS were placed in separate whirl packs (eNasco, Fort Atkinson, Wisconsin, USA) containing either 90mL TSB for fecals and 50mL TSB for RAMS, and then incubated for 2 hours at 25°C, 8 hours at 42°C, and held overnight at 6°C. E. coli O157:H7 was recovered using IMS and the Dynal Bead Retriever, with 50 μL of washed beads streaked for isolation on Rainbow agar and another 50 μL streaked for isolation on Sorbitol MacConkey Agar [14]. As performed in our laboratory, this IMS method has been shown to be able to detect as few as 1CFU/10g of calf feces (Data not shown). Two suspect colonies per positive plate were confirmed as E. coli O157:H7using PCR as described above [17]. Confirmed colonies were stored at -80°C in Microbank vials for further analysis.

Euthanasia and necropsy

All calves were euthanized with pentobarbital sodium (Euthasol solution, Virbac, Fort Worth, Texas, USA) intravenously and necropsied on the 11th day p.i. Intestinal sections of the duodenum, jejunum, ileum, cecum, spiral colon, distal colon, and rectum were collected for bacterial culture (approximately 5cm in length). Sections of pancreas, liver, mesenteric lymph node, gall bladder, lung and kidney were also taken for culture (approximately 5g). Each segment of intestine was tied with string by both ends so that the contents and the mucosa could be cultured for the presence of E. coli O157:H7. Once transported to the laboratory, one end of the tissue segment was cut and the contents were collected in a whirl pack bag containing 90mL of TSB. The intestinal tissue was then cut longitudinally to expose the mucosa and placed in a separate whirl pack bag with 90mL of TSB. The non-intestinal tissues were each placed in a bag containing 50mL of TSB. All TSB bags were then incubated for 2h at 25°C, 8h at 42°C, and then held overnight at 6°C. E. coli O157:H7 was recovered using the same method as described above.

Data analysis

The ID50 was determined for the wildlife E. coli O157:H7 strain with binary logistic regression using StataIC 12 (StataCorp LP, College Station, Texas, USA) computer software by calculating the number of calves that became infected over the total number of calves used for each inoculum dose. With these percentages, a curve was generated to determine the dose at which 50% of the calves became infected with the inoculated E. coli O157:H7 strain.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Standard growth curve of bacterial strain

The wildlife Escherichia coli O157:H7 strain was isolated from a deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus) November 2009 in Monterey County, CA on a spinach produce ranch. Three growth curves were made by incubating a bead of stock inoculum, taken from -80°C frozen banks (Pro-lab, Richmond Hill, Ohio, USA), in 150mL of brain heart infusion, BHI (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, USA) broth. Each broth was incubated, plated, and original concentrations were calculated as previously described by Antaki-Zukoski et al., 2018 [14]. The E. coli O157:H7 strain was also evaluated for both Shiga toxins, intimin (eaeA), and hemolysin A (HlyA) virulence genes using an endpoint analysis (Eppendorf, Hauppauge, New York, USA) according to the PCR protocol [3] (data not shown).

Ethics statement

All animal experiments were conducted under the approval by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at the University of California Davis Animal Care and Use program (AUP #15459). Experimental procedures followed the federal guidelines outlined in the “Animal Welfare Act” and “Health Research Extension Act”, where personal protective equipment, standard operating protocols, daily cleaning/observation/animal enrichment, and sedation/euthanasia/necropsy methods were described in detail for the review and approval by the committee.

Animal experiments

Six male calves 1-2-days-old that had received colostrum were purchased from an approved dairy. Each calf was housed individually in the biosafety level-II animal facility at the Teaching and Research Animal Care Services (TRACS). The calves were fed commercial milk replacer without antibiotics twice a day and given free access to water. Bedding material was removed while pens were bleached and rinsed daily, to ensure fresh fecal collection. Upon arrival, each calf was deemed healthy by clinical examination and hematological analysis with a serum chemistry panel and complete blood count. Additionally, each calf was tested for the presence of Cryptosporidium spp. with an acid-fast stain performed on feces. In order to confirm that calves were not colonized with E .coli O157:H7, fresh rectal fecal samples and rectoanal mucosal swabs (RAMS) were collected for three consecutive days prior to inoculation with the wildlife E. coli O157:H7 [15]. Ten grams of each fecal sample was measured into 90mL of Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, USA), while the RAMS were placed in 50mL of TSB. The samples were incubated at 25°C for 2 hours, 42°C for 8 hours followed by immunomagnetic separation (IMS) using anti-O157 antibodies (Dynal Inc, Camarillo, California, USA) and cultured on MacConkey agar with sorbitol, cefixime, and potassium tellurite (Becton, Dickinson, Co, Sparks, Maryland, USA), and Rainbow agar (Biolog, Hayward, California, USA) for the presence of E. coli O157:H7 [14]. If any colonies were considered E. coli O157 suspects, traditional PCR was performed using a set of specific primers to detect O-antigen-encoding rfb regions of E. coli O157:H7 [3]. Once the calves were confirmed negative for Cryptosporidium spp. and E. coli O157H7 prior infections, they were placed in individual pens, separated by one pen length. They were then assigned an E. coli O157:H7 inoculum dose.

Inoculation of animals

One micro bank bead for the wildlife strain, stored at -80°C, was placed in a 250mL flask containing 150mL of BHI. The flasks were incubated at 37°C for 6 hours, while shaking at 100 rpm. Once the determined optical density was reached, the flasks were placed on ice for 15 minutes. At this point the optical density was measured again and the concentration of the stock solution was calculated by using the growth curve from the E. coli O157:H7 strain. From the known stock solution concentration, the inoculums were prepared for the wildlife E. coli O157:H7 strain in 200mL of PBS.

In previous lab studies inoculating neonatal calves with wildlife E. coli O157:H7 strain isolated from a feral swine, at 104 CFU and 107 CFU showed that these inoculum doses were not high enough to cause an infection (data below). To ensure the feral swine and deer mouse strains were distinct from one another and from other E. coli O157:H7 isolates collected in California, a Pulsed Field Gel Electrophoresis (PFGE) was performed. The isolates were digested using the Center for Disease Control and Prevention PulseNet PFGE with XbaI restriction enzyme [16]. A dendogram was constructed by analyzing each digest profile with band matching and phylogenetic clustering analysis methods in Gel ComparII (Applied Maths, Sint-Martens-Laterm, Belgium) computer software. For this study, assuming that the two wildlife E. coli O157:H7 strains have similar pathogenicity patterns once inoculated into a host, one calf served as a negative control, two calves were inoculated with 108 CFU (calf A and calf B), two calves were inoculated with 109 CFU (calf A and calf B), and one calf was inoculated with 1010 CFU (positive control) of the deer mouse wildlife E. coli O157:H7 strain. Serial dilutions from 10-1 to 10-10 were made in 9mL of PBS and plated in triplicate on LB for each stock solution and inoculum. After an overnight incubation at 37° C, the true concentration of each inoculum was calculated. The individually housed calves were intragastrically inoculated with their assigned inoculum dose in 200 ml PBS with a calf gastric feeder (VetOne, Boise, Idaho, USA) followed with another 200mL of PBS as a wash.

Daily sampling and fecal scoring

Fecal samples and RAMS were collected twice daily for the first two days post-inoculation (p.i.) and then collected once a day until the 11th day p.i. Fecal consistency was scored on a scale from 1-4, with 1=Normal, 2=Paste, 3=Liquid, and 4=Water (Table 1). All of the samples were collected in the afternoon and transported back to the laboratory in a refrigerated state. The samples were processed within 24 hours of sampling.

Analytical assays for detecting E. coli O157:H7

Each 10g fecal sample and RAMS were placed in separate whirl packs (eNasco, Fort Atkinson, Wisconsin, USA) containing either 90mL TSB for fecals and 50mL TSB for RAMS, and then incubated for 2 hours at 25°C, 8 hours at 42°C, and held overnight at 6°C. E. coli O157:H7 was recovered using IMS and the Dynal Bead Retriever, with 50 μL of washed beads streaked for isolation on Rainbow agar and another 50 μL streaked for isolation on Sorbitol MacConkey Agar [14]. As performed in our laboratory, this IMS method has been shown to be able to detect as few as 1CFU/10g of calf feces (Data not shown). Two suspect colonies per positive plate were confirmed as E. coli O157:H7using PCR as described above [17]. Confirmed colonies were stored at -80°C in Microbank vials for further analysis.

Euthanasia and necropsy

All calves were euthanized with pentobarbital sodium (Euthasol solution, Virbac, Fort Worth, Texas, USA) intravenously and necropsied on the 11th day p.i. Intestinal sections of the duodenum, jejunum, ileum, cecum, spiral colon, distal colon, and rectum were collected for bacterial culture (approximately 5cm in length). Sections of pancreas, liver, mesenteric lymph node, gall bladder, lung and kidney were also taken for culture (approximately 5g). Each segment of intestine was tied with string by both ends so that the contents and the mucosa could be cultured for the presence of E. coli O157:H7. Once transported to the laboratory, one end of the tissue segment was cut and the contents were collected in a whirl pack bag containing 90mL of TSB. The intestinal tissue was then cut longitudinally to expose the mucosa and placed in a separate whirl pack bag with 90mL of TSB. The non-intestinal tissues were each placed in a bag containing 50mL of TSB. All TSB bags were then incubated for 2h at 25°C, 8h at 42°C, and then held overnight at 6°C. E. coli O157:H7 was recovered using the same method as described above.

Data analysis

The ID50 was determined for the wildlife E. coli O157:H7 strain with binary logistic regression using StataIC 12 (StataCorp LP, College Station, Texas, USA) computer software by calculating the number of calves that became infected over the total number of calves used for each inoculum dose. With these percentages, a curve was generated to determine the dose at which 50% of the calves became infected with the inoculated E. coli O157:H7 strain.

Table 1: Explanation of daily fecal scoring for each of the six experimental calves.

Score Status Description
  1 Normal Forms a pile on bedding
  2 Paste Pile has a flatter surface area
  3 Liquid Fecal pile runs through bedding
  4 Water Fecal contains flecks of tissue and material

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Our definition of an infected calf was one that shed the wildlife E. coli O157:H7 inoculum for more than 48 hours p.i. and was culture positive in at least one of its tissues at necropsy on day 11 p.i. This was to account for passage of the inoculum through the gastrointestinal tract without attaching/colonizing the actual tissues. The wildlife E. coli O157:H7 strain used for this study was PCR-confirmed positive for both Shiga toxins, the attaching/effacing (eaeA), and the hemolysin A (HlyA) genes. By PFGE analysis, the deer mouse E. coli O157:H7 strain was different from the feral swine strain as well as three other E. coli O157:H7 strains collected from bovine feces in various parts of California (Figure 1).

PFGE dendogram of both wildlife and bovine Escherichia coli O157:H7 isolated from various parts of California, USA. Bovine strain 8055 isolated from Yolo County, Deer mouse inoculum strain isolated from Monterey County, Bovine strain 14A isolated from Imperial County, Bovine strain W1 isolated from Colusa County, and Feral pig strain 1174 isolated from San Benito County.

Figure 1 PFGE dendogram of both wildlife and bovine Escherichia coli O157:H7 isolated from various parts of California, USA. Bovine strain 8055 isolated from Yolo County, Deer mouse inoculum strain isolated from Monterey County, Bovine strain 14A isolated from Imperial County, Bovine strain W1 isolated from Colusa County, and Feral pig strain 1174 isolated from San Benito County.

Higher average fecal scores were observed in the 109 CFU inoculum group compared to the calves inoculated with 108 CFU. The positive control calf stayed consistent at a score of 1, while the negative control calf fluctuated between a score of 1-3 (Figure 2). IMS and culture was performed on daily fecal and RAMS collections for the detection of the inoculated E. coli O157:H7 strain. Calf B from the low inoculum dose shed for six days, while Calf A stopped shedding after four days post-inoculation. Both calves inoculated at 109 CFU shed longer than the lower dose inoculum group, with Calf B shedding for 7 days and the Calf A shedding for the entire duration of the trial. The positive control also shed the entire experimental time of eleven days. The E. coli O157:H7 inoculum was never recovered from the negative control. Table 2 represents the IMS daily collection results.

Average daily fecal scores for each inoculum group of experimental calves. Negative control: negative control calf; Lower inoculum group: average fecal scores from the calves inoculated with 108  CFU of the wildlife Escherichia coli O157:H7; Higher inoculum group: average fecal scores from the calves inoculated with 109 CFU of the wildlife Escherichia coli O157:H7; Positive control: positive control calf inoculated with 1010 CFU of the wildlife Escherichia coli O157:H7.

Figure 2 Average daily fecal scores for each inoculum group of experimental calves. Negative control: negative control calf; Lower inoculum group: average fecal scores from the calves inoculated with 108 CFU of the wildlife Escherichia coli O157:H7; Higher inoculum group: average fecal scores from the calves inoculated with 109 CFU of the wildlife Escherichia coli O157:H7; Positive control: positive control calf inoculated with 1010 CFU of the wildlife Escherichia coli O157:H7.

Since the negative control calf received fecal scores between1-3, it was determined that there could be another pathogen causing these clinical signs. A possible conclusion was that the calf contracted Cryptosporidium spp. before the experiment and was pre-screened negative, but the infection caused clinical signs while in the experiment. It has been reported that neonatal calves infected with the protozoan Cryptosporidium spp. are usually asymptomatic, and mainly stressed animals show clinical manifestations of the disease associated with various degrees of diarrhea [18]. The negative control calf might have been exposed to the Cryptosporidim spp. protozoa prior to or during transportation, and then stressed due to the experiment, causing clinical signs of diarrhea. This is in comparison to the positive control that had normal feces throughout the entire experiment. Consequently, clinical signs of diarrhea and fecal score differences between inoculum doses could not be correlated to the E. coli O157:H7 inoculum.

Due to animal welfare, a low dose inoculum experiment was not performed with this wildlife E. coli O157:H7 strain, but an E. coli O157:H7 strain isolated from feral swine was experimentally inoculated in neonatal calves in previous studies using doses of 104 CFU and 107 CFU (Table 2). Since no animals were considered to be infected with the feral swine strain, higher inoculum doses were used instead for the current study. This is a limitation, but assuming the two strains behave the same in neonatal calves, the infectious dose at 50% was calculated to show that 108 CFU is the ID50 value for the deer mouse wildlife E. coli O157:H7 strain.

On the 11th day post-inoculation, the calves were euthanized and necropsied. IMS and culture was performed on all tissues and intestinal contents that were collected from each calf. The wildlife E. coli O157:H7 inoculum was never recovered from the pancreas, liver, mesenteric lymph node, gall bladder, lung, or kidney from any of the calves. Recovery of E. coli O157:H7 wildlife strain from tissues is shown in Table 3. The E. coli O157:H7 inoculum was recovered from at least one intestinal tissue in all calves except for the negative control and Calf A inoculated at 10?8 CFU. Due to its negative fecal and RAMS cultures after four days post-inoculation and tissue culture at necropsy, by our case definition Calf A at 108 CFU was considered not infected.

The infectious ID50 for the wildlife E. coli O157:H7 strain was calculated to be 108 CFU. One of two calves inoculated at 108 CFU was considered infected. Both calves inoculated at 109 CFU were deemed infected due to their long shedding period of E. coli O157:H7 [2,19]. Although our case numbers are limited, there was also a dose-dependent trend seen in the cultured tissues that were taken from each calf. It appeared that if a calf was inoculated with the higher dose of the wildlife E. coli O157:H7, it would shed for a longer period of time and have culture-positive tissues when tested at the end of the experiment.

Table 2: Daily collection IMS results for shedding of the wildlife Escherichia coli O157:H7 in each calf following oral inoculation.

Wildlife E. coli O157:H7 isolated from a Feral Swine Wildlife E. coli O157:H7 isolated from a Deer Mouse
Days p.i. Negative Calf A 10?CFU Calf B 10?CFU Calf C 10?CFU Calf D 10?CFU Calf A 10?CFU Negative Calf A 10?CFU Calf B 10?CFU Calf A 10?CFU Calf B 10?CFU Positive (10¹?CFU)
 1      -      -      -      -      -      -      -     +     +     +     +     +
 2      -      -      -      -      -      -      -     +     +     +     +     +
 3      -      -      -      -      -      -      -     +     +     +     +     +
 4      -      -      -      -      -      -      -     +      -     +       +
 5      -      -      -      -      -      -      -      -      -     +     +     +
 6      -      -      -      -      -      -      -      -      +     +     +     +
 7      -      -      -      -      -      -      -      -      -     +     +     +
 8      -      -      -      -      -      -      -      -      -     +      -     +
 9      -      -      -      -      -      -      -      -      -     +      -     +
10      -      -      -      -      -      -      -      -      -     +      -     +
11 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A        -      -     +      -     +
(+) indicates presence of the Escherichia coli O157:H7 inoculum tested by Immunomagnitic Separation and PCR-confirmed on the day of collection from each calf, (-) indicates the Escherichia coli O157:H7 inoculum was not detected on the day of collection by Immunomagnetic Separation from each calf; (N/A) calves were euthanized the day prior.

Table 3: IMS detection of the wildlife Escherichia coli O157:H7 in intestinal tissue 11 days post-inoculation.

Tissue Segment Negative Calf A 10?CFU Calf B 10?CFU Calf A 10?CFU Calf B 10?CFU Positive (10¹?CFU)
Duodenum      -      -      -     +      -     +
Jejunum      -      -      -     +      -     +
Ileum      -      -      -     +     +     +
Cecum      -      -      -     +     +     +
Spiral Colon      -      -      +      -      -     +
Distal Colon      -      -      -     +      -     +
Rectum      -      -      -      -      -     +
(+) indicates that the wildlife Escherichia coli O157:H7 w    +as detected in the tissue with Immunomagnetic Separation and PCR-confirmed, (-) indicates the wildlife Escherichia coli O157:H7 was not detected in the tissue

 

CONCLUSION

Wild animals can potentially carry E. coli O157:H7, causing transmission to humans when they are in contact with farm animals or produce fields [20]. Only a limited number of experimental studies have evaluated the ability of wildlife species carrying and transmitting the E. coli O157:H7 pathogen through the environment or to other animals. Due to this limitation, we don’t fully understand the potential virulence of these wildlife isolates. We have shown in this study that a wildlife E. coli O157:H7 isolate, from a deer mouse, has the capability to experimentally infect neonatal calves at a high inoculum dose of 108 CFU, with a wide range of intestinal tissue colonization if infection continues for a week or longer. Future studies could further examine the host-pathogen interaction between these wildlife isolates and their reservoirs by determining the infectious dose/clinical signs in deer mouse models.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The authors are grateful to the Teaching and Research Animal Care services for their assistance on the purchasing, care, and transportation of the animals used for this experiment. The authors would also like to thank the California Animal Health and Food Safety, University of California, Davis, for their necropsy floor and their overall assistance. Support for this research was provided to the Western Center for Food Safety contract U01-003-572 from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

REFERENCES

1. Lim JY, Yoon JW, Hovde CJ. A brief overview of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and its plasmid O157. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010; 20: 1-10.

2. Naylor SW, Roe AJ, Nart P, Spears K, Smith DGE. Low CJ, et al. Escherichia coli O157:H7 forms attaching and effacing lesions at the terminal rectum of cattle and colonization requires the LEE4 operon. Micobiol. 2005; 151: 2773-2781.

3. Philpott D, Ebel F. Methods in Molecular Medicine: E. coli-Shiga toxin methods and protocols; Humana Press Inc.: Totowa, New Jersey, USA, 2003; 978-59259-316-3.

4. Dean-Nystrom E, Bosworth BT, Moon HW, O’Brien A. Escherichia coli O157:H7 requires intimin for enteropathogenicity in calves. Infect Immun. 1998; 66, 4560-4563.

5. Jeamsripong S, Chase JA, Jay-Russell MT, Buchanan RL, Atwill ER. Experimental in-field transfer and survival of Escherichia coli from animal feces to romaine lettuce in Salinas Valley, California. Microorganisms. 2019; 7: 408.

6. Nielsen EM, Skov MN, Madsen JJ, Lodal J, Jespersen JB, Baggesen DL. Verocytotoxin-producing Escherichia coli in wild birds and rodents in close proximity to farms. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004; 70: 6944- 6947.

7. Fernens WA, Hovde CJ. Escherichia coli O157:H7: Animal reservoir and sources of human infection. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2011; 8: 465-487.

8. Singh P, Sha Q, Lacher DW, Del Valle J, Mosci RE, Moore JA, et al. Characterization of enteropathogenic and Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in cattle and deer in a shared agroecosystem. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2015; 5: 29.

9. Kilonzo C, Li X, Vivas EJ, Jay-Russell MT, Fernandez KL, Atwill ER. Fecal shedding of zoonotic food-borne pathogens by wild rodent in a major agricultural region of the central California coast. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013; 79: 6337-6344.

10. Naylor SW, Low CJ, Besser TE, Mahajan A, Gunn GJ, Pearce MC, et al. Lymphoid follicle-dense mucosa at the terminal rectum is the principal site of colonization of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 in the bovine host. Infect Immun. 2003; 71: 1505-1512.

11. Cornick NA, Helgerson AF. Transmission and infectious dose of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in swine. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004; 70: 5331-5335.

12. Lim J, Li J, Sheng H, Besser T, Potter K, Hovde C. Escherichia coli O157:H7 colonization at the rectoanal junction of long-duration culture positive cattle. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007; 73: 1380-1382.

13. Baines D, Lee B, McAllister T. Heterogeneity in enerohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 fecal shedding in cattle is related to Escherichia coli O157:H7 colonization of the small and large intestine. Can J Microbiol. 2008; 54: 984-995.

14. Antaki-Zukoski EM, Li X, Pesavento PA, Nguyen THB, Hoar BR, Atwill ER. Comparative pathogenicity of wildlife and bovine Escherichia coli O157:H7 strains in experimentally inoculated neonatal Jersey calves. Vet Sci. 2018; 5: 1-11.

15. Rice DH, Sheng HQ, Wynia SA, Hovde CJ. Rectoanal mucosal swab culture is more sensitive than fecal culture and distinguishes Escherichia coli O157:H7-colonized cattle and those transiently shedding the same organism. J Clin Microbiol. 2003; 41: 4924-4929.

16. Ribot EM, Fair MA, Gautom R, Cameron DN, Hunter SB, Swaminathan B, et al. Standardization of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis protocols for the subtyping of Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella, and Shigella for PulseNet. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2006; 3: 59-67.

17. Paton JC, Paton AW. Methods for detection of STEC in humans. In: Philpott, D., Ebel, F. (eds) E. coli. Methods in Molecular Medicine™, volume 73; Humana Press Inc.: Totowa, New Jersey, USA, 2003; 9-26.

18. Díaz-Lee A, Mercado R, Onuoha EO, Ozaki LS, Muñoz P, Muñoz V, et al. Cryptosporidium parvum in diarrhetic calves detected by microscopy and identified by immunochromatographic and molecular methods. Vet Parasitol. 2010; 176: 139-144.

19. Besser TE, Richards BL, Rice DH, Hancock DD. Escherichia coli O157:H7 infection of calves: infectious dose and direct contact transmission. Epidemiol Infect. 2001; 127: 555-560.

20. Brando RF, Miliwebsky E, Bentancor L, Deza N, Baschkier A, Ramos MV, et al. Renal damage and death in weaned mice after oral infection with shiga toxin 2-producing Escherichia coli strains. Clin Exp Immuno. 2008; 153: 297-306.

Li X, Antaki Zukoski EM, Nguyen THB, Hoar BR, Jay Russell MT, et al. (2020) Identifying the Shedding Patterns of Wildlife Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Experimentally Inoculated Neonatal Jersey Calves. J Vet Med Res 7(2): 1183.

Received : 06 Feb 2020
Accepted : 24 Feb 2020
Published : 28 Feb 2020
Journals
Annals of Otolaryngology and Rhinology
ISSN : 2379-948X
Launched : 2014
JSM Schizophrenia
Launched : 2016
Journal of Nausea
Launched : 2020
JSM Internal Medicine
Launched : 2016
JSM Hepatitis
Launched : 2016
JSM Oro Facial Surgeries
ISSN : 2578-3211
Launched : 2016
Journal of Human Nutrition and Food Science
ISSN : 2333-6706
Launched : 2013
JSM Regenerative Medicine and Bioengineering
ISSN : 2379-0490
Launched : 2013
JSM Spine
ISSN : 2578-3181
Launched : 2016
Archives of Palliative Care
ISSN : 2573-1165
Launched : 2016
JSM Nutritional Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3203
Launched : 2017
Annals of Neurodegenerative Disorders
ISSN : 2476-2032
Launched : 2016
Journal of Fever
ISSN : 2641-7782
Launched : 2017
JSM Bone Marrow Research
ISSN : 2578-3351
Launched : 2016
JSM Mathematics and Statistics
ISSN : 2578-3173
Launched : 2014
Journal of Autoimmunity and Research
ISSN : 2573-1173
Launched : 2014
JSM Arthritis
ISSN : 2475-9155
Launched : 2016
JSM Head and Neck Cancer-Cases and Reviews
ISSN : 2573-1610
Launched : 2016
JSM General Surgery Cases and Images
ISSN : 2573-1564
Launched : 2016
JSM Anatomy and Physiology
ISSN : 2573-1262
Launched : 2016
JSM Dental Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1548
Launched : 2016
Annals of Emergency Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1017
Launched : 2016
Annals of Mens Health and Wellness
ISSN : 2641-7707
Launched : 2017
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Health Care
ISSN : 2576-0084
Launched : 2018
Journal of Chronic Diseases and Management
ISSN : 2573-1300
Launched : 2016
Annals of Vaccines and Immunization
ISSN : 2378-9379
Launched : 2014
JSM Heart Surgery Cases and Images
ISSN : 2578-3157
Launched : 2016
Annals of Reproductive Medicine and Treatment
ISSN : 2573-1092
Launched : 2016
JSM Brain Science
ISSN : 2573-1289
Launched : 2016
JSM Biomarkers
ISSN : 2578-3815
Launched : 2014
JSM Biology
ISSN : 2475-9392
Launched : 2016
Archives of Stem Cell and Research
ISSN : 2578-3580
Launched : 2014
Annals of Clinical and Medical Microbiology
ISSN : 2578-3629
Launched : 2014
JSM Pediatric Surgery
ISSN : 2578-3149
Launched : 2017
Journal of Memory Disorder and Rehabilitation
ISSN : 2578-319X
Launched : 2016
JSM Tropical Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2578-3165
Launched : 2016
JSM Head and Face Medicine
ISSN : 2578-3793
Launched : 2016
JSM Cardiothoracic Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1297
Launched : 2016
JSM Bone and Joint Diseases
ISSN : 2578-3351
Launched : 2017
JSM Bioavailability and Bioequivalence
ISSN : 2641-7812
Launched : 2017
JSM Atherosclerosis
ISSN : 2573-1270
Launched : 2016
Journal of Genitourinary Disorders
ISSN : 2641-7790
Launched : 2017
Journal of Fractures and Sprains
ISSN : 2578-3831
Launched : 2016
Journal of Autism and Epilepsy
ISSN : 2641-7774
Launched : 2016
Annals of Marine Biology and Research
ISSN : 2573-105X
Launched : 2014
JSM Health Education & Primary Health Care
ISSN : 2578-3777
Launched : 2016
JSM Communication Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3807
Launched : 2016
Annals of Musculoskeletal Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3599
Launched : 2016
Annals of Virology and Research
ISSN : 2573-1122
Launched : 2014
JSM Renal Medicine
ISSN : 2573-1637
Launched : 2016
Journal of Muscle Health
ISSN : 2578-3823
Launched : 2016
JSM Genetics and Genomics
ISSN : 2334-1823
Launched : 2013
JSM Anxiety and Depression
ISSN : 2475-9139
Launched : 2016
Clinical Journal of Heart Diseases
ISSN : 2641-7766
Launched : 2016
Annals of Medicinal Chemistry and Research
ISSN : 2378-9336
Launched : 2014
JSM Pain and Management
ISSN : 2578-3378
Launched : 2016
JSM Women's Health
ISSN : 2578-3696
Launched : 2016
Clinical Research in HIV or AIDS
ISSN : 2374-0094
Launched : 2013
Journal of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Obesity
ISSN : 2333-6692
Launched : 2013
Journal of Substance Abuse and Alcoholism
ISSN : 2373-9363
Launched : 2013
JSM Neurosurgery and Spine
ISSN : 2373-9479
Launched : 2013
Journal of Liver and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2379-0830
Launched : 2014
Journal of Drug Design and Research
ISSN : 2379-089X
Launched : 2014
JSM Clinical Oncology and Research
ISSN : 2373-938X
Launched : 2013
JSM Bioinformatics, Genomics and Proteomics
ISSN : 2576-1102
Launched : 2014
JSM Chemistry
ISSN : 2334-1831
Launched : 2013
Journal of Trauma and Care
ISSN : 2573-1246
Launched : 2014
JSM Surgical Oncology and Research
ISSN : 2578-3688
Launched : 2016
Annals of Food Processing and Preservation
ISSN : 2573-1033
Launched : 2016
Journal of Radiology and Radiation Therapy
ISSN : 2333-7095
Launched : 2013
JSM Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
ISSN : 2578-3572
Launched : 2016
Annals of Clinical Pathology
ISSN : 2373-9282
Launched : 2013
Annals of Cardiovascular Diseases
ISSN : 2641-7731
Launched : 2016
Journal of Behavior
ISSN : 2576-0076
Launched : 2016
Annals of Clinical and Experimental Metabolism
ISSN : 2572-2492
Launched : 2016
Clinical Research in Infectious Diseases
ISSN : 2379-0636
Launched : 2013
JSM Microbiology
ISSN : 2333-6455
Launched : 2013
Journal of Urology and Research
ISSN : 2379-951X
Launched : 2014
Journal of Family Medicine and Community Health
ISSN : 2379-0547
Launched : 2013
Annals of Pregnancy and Care
ISSN : 2578-336X
Launched : 2017
JSM Cell and Developmental Biology
ISSN : 2379-061X
Launched : 2013
Annals of Aquaculture and Research
ISSN : 2379-0881
Launched : 2014
Clinical Research in Pulmonology
ISSN : 2333-6625
Launched : 2013
Journal of Immunology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2333-6714
Launched : 2013
Annals of Forensic Research and Analysis
ISSN : 2378-9476
Launched : 2014
JSM Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
ISSN : 2333-7109
Launched : 2013
Annals of Breast Cancer Research
ISSN : 2641-7685
Launched : 2016
Annals of Gerontology and Geriatric Research
ISSN : 2378-9409
Launched : 2014
Journal of Sleep Medicine and Disorders
ISSN : 2379-0822
Launched : 2014
JSM Burns and Trauma
ISSN : 2475-9406
Launched : 2016
Chemical Engineering and Process Techniques
ISSN : 2333-6633
Launched : 2013
Annals of Clinical Cytology and Pathology
ISSN : 2475-9430
Launched : 2014
JSM Allergy and Asthma
ISSN : 2573-1254
Launched : 2016
Journal of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
ISSN : 2334-2307
Launched : 2013
Annals of Sports Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2379-0571
Launched : 2014
JSM Sexual Medicine
ISSN : 2578-3718
Launched : 2016
Annals of Vascular Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2378-9344
Launched : 2014
JSM Biotechnology and Biomedical Engineering
ISSN : 2333-7117
Launched : 2013
Journal of Hematology and Transfusion
ISSN : 2333-6684
Launched : 2013
JSM Environmental Science and Ecology
ISSN : 2333-7141
Launched : 2013
Journal of Cardiology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2333-6676
Launched : 2013
JSM Nanotechnology and Nanomedicine
ISSN : 2334-1815
Launched : 2013
Journal of Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders
ISSN : 2475-9473
Launched : 2016
JSM Ophthalmology
ISSN : 2333-6447
Launched : 2013
Journal of Pharmacology and Clinical Toxicology
ISSN : 2333-7079
Launched : 2013
Annals of Psychiatry and Mental Health
ISSN : 2374-0124
Launched : 2013
Medical Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
ISSN : 2333-6439
Launched : 2013
Annals of Pediatrics and Child Health
ISSN : 2373-9312
Launched : 2013
JSM Clinical Pharmaceutics
ISSN : 2379-9498
Launched : 2014
JSM Foot and Ankle
ISSN : 2475-9112
Launched : 2016
JSM Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementia
ISSN : 2378-9565
Launched : 2014
Journal of Addiction Medicine and Therapy
ISSN : 2333-665X
Launched : 2013
Annals of Public Health and Research
ISSN : 2378-9328
Launched : 2014
Annals of Orthopedics and Rheumatology
ISSN : 2373-9290
Launched : 2013
Journal of Clinical Nephrology and Research
ISSN : 2379-0652
Launched : 2014
Annals of Community Medicine and Practice
ISSN : 2475-9465
Launched : 2014
Annals of Biometrics and Biostatistics
ISSN : 2374-0116
Launched : 2013
JSM Clinical Case Reports
ISSN : 2373-9819
Launched : 2013
Journal of Cancer Biology and Research
ISSN : 2373-9436
Launched : 2013
Journal of Surgery and Transplantation Science
ISSN : 2379-0911
Launched : 2013
Journal of Dermatology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2373-9371
Launched : 2013
JSM Gastroenterology and Hepatology
ISSN : 2373-9487
Launched : 2013
Annals of Nursing and Practice
ISSN : 2379-9501
Launched : 2014
JSM Dentistry
ISSN : 2333-7133
Launched : 2013
Author Information X