Loading

Medical Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Serum CA-125 for Early Prediction of Miscarriage

Research Article | Open Access | Volume 4 | Issue 1

  • 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ain-Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
+ Show More - Show Less
Corresponding Authors
Mohamed Samir Sweed, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ain-Shams University, Cairo, Egypt; Tel: 02 01001222047.
Abstract

Objective: To assess the predictive value of single measurement of maternal serum CA-125 for pregnancy outcome in threatened miscarriage.

Materials and methods: A prospective case-control study, conducted on 180 women pregnant at 6-12 weeks attending the outpatient clinic or the emergency room of Ain-Shams Maternity Hospital during the period from January 2013 to January 2014. 120 had symptoms of threatened miscarriage and 60 with apparently healthy pregnancy as their control. Serum CA-125 was assayed by chemiluminescent immunometric method and they were followed up till 20 weeks gestational age.

Results: 180 pregnant women were recruited in the study and were divided into two groups, group I (120 with threatened miscarriage) and group II (60 controls). Serum CA-125 was significant higher in group I, and also it was significantly higher in women who developed miscarriage than those who continued their pregnancy till 20 weeks. Using Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, optimal cut-off criteria of CA-125 > 58 IU/ml for prediction of occurrence of miscarriage in patients with threatened miscarriage would be established with sensitivity of 78 % and specificity 97%.

Conclusion: Maternal serum CA-125 seems to be a promising biomarker for the early prediction of pregnancy outcome in threatened miscarriage.

Citation

Sweed MS, Sammour HM, Bakr AA (2016) Serum CA-125 for Early Prediction of Miscarriage. Med J Obstet Gynecol 4(1): 1077.

Keywords

•    CA-125
•    Threatened miscarriage
•    Abortion
•    Miscarriage

ABBREVIATIONS

CA-125: Cancer Antigen-125; ROC Curve: Receiver-Operating characteristic Curve

INTRODUCTION

Miscarriage is defined as pregnancy loss before 20 weeks, or fetus less than 500 grams before the age of viability [1], with more than 4 fifth occurring in the first trimester [2]. Threatened miscarriage affects one fifth of women, with the uncertainty about its prognosis, many biochemical markers have been studied to predict its outcome [3]. However, the differentiation of normal and abnormal pregnancy remains a clinical challenge, with no conclusive biochemical marker used before sonographic diagnosis is established which might need several weeks of follow up [4].

Cancer Antigen-125 (CA-125) is a cell surface high molecular weight glycoprotein that has been found to be expressed by fetal chorion, amniotic fluid, and maternal deciduas in significant amounts [5]. This theoretically implies that any disruption of the deciduas or fetal membranes’ basement membrane would lead to a rise in maternal CA-125, and predict a subsequent miscarriage [6].

This study was conducted to assess the use of maternal serum CA-125 as a biochemical marker for the prediction of miscarriage.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective case-control study was conducted in Ain-Shams University Maternity Hospital from January 2013 to January 2014. Approval of the ethical committee of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology was obtained before commencement of the study. 180 women pregnant at 6-12 weeks (calculated by last menstrual period (LMP), with regular cycles) were recruited in the study. 120 women were diagnosed as threatened miscarriage cases with vaginal bleeding or spotting and positive fetal life by ultra sonography. The other 60 showed no past or present history of bleeding in the current pregnancy. All women not meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria were excluded, and an informed written consent was obtained from the participants.

The exclusion criteria included: missed abortion, blighted ovum, molar pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy, high-order pregnancy, ovarian tumors with pregnancy, history of pelvic inflammatory disease, history of pelvic tuberculosis, and history of ovarian hyerstimulation (conceived by ovulation induction and /or assisted reproduction). After careful and thorough history, physical, and sonographic examination to confirm gestational age, fetal viability, intrauterine single gestation and absence of exclusion criteria, the participants were allocated to two groups, group I (120 women with threatened miscarriage) and group II (60 controls).

5 ml of venous blood were collected from each patient for measuring CA-125 serum level. After clotting of the blood sample the serum was separated from the cells by centrifugation within 2 hours of collection and removed using sterile pipette. All samples were stored refrigerated at 2-8 C? for one day. Serum levels of CA-125 were assayed by chemiluminescent immunometric method using Immulite 1000 systems. Kits used were Cobas e 601 supplied by Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics products Ltd. (Llanberis, Gwynedd, LL554EL, and UK). Measuring of all samples was analyzed in Biochemistry Department of Ain-Shams University Maternity Hospital.

Patients with threatened miscarriage were reassured and advised physical and mental rest at home. Follow-up monthly visits were arranged in the out-patient clinic till 20th weeks. During each visit, the patients were re-examined by ultrasound to re-evaluate their pregnancy state. Participants were instructed to come to the emergency room of the hospital if considerable vaginal bleeding occurred and the contact numbers of the investigators were given to them.

Sample size was calculated using EpiInfo® version 6.0, setting the type-1 error (α) at 0.05 and the power (1-β) at 0.8. Data from a previous study [7] showed that, among women with threatened abortion, the mean (± SD) serum CA-125 concentration was 30.89 ± 2.93 IU/ml (in women with ongoing pregnancy) and 58.17 ± 7.52 IU/ml (in women who aborted) (p=0.01). Calculation according to these values produced a sample size of 31 cases in each group. Assuming a drop-out rate of 10% (loss of contact during follow-up), a minimum of 35 cases should be included in each group. Statistical analysis was done on a personal computer using MedCalc© version 12.5 (MedCalc© Software bvba, Ostend, Belgium). Normality of numerical data distribution was tested using D’Agostino-Pearson test. Since these data were skewed, they were presented as median and inter-quartile range and intergroup differences were compared non-parametrically using the Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical data were presented as number and percentage. The Pearson chi square test was used to test between-group differences as regards nominal variables. Fisher’s exact test was used in place of the Pearson chi square test if > 20% of the cells in a contingency table had an expected count < 5. Between-group differences as regards ordinal variables were tested using the chi square test for trend. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to examine the value of continuous variables for prediction of binary outcomes. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

180 pregnant women were recruited in the study and were divided into two groups, group I (120 with threatened miscarriage) and group II (60 controls). Age, parity and gestational age at time of recruitment showed no statistical difference between the 2 groups (Table 1). 30 (25%) of group I developed miscarriage while 90 (75%) continued their pregnancy till 20 weeks. In group II 6 (10%) patient only developed miscarriage and 54 (90%) continued their pregnancy. Serum CA-125 showed a statistically significant difference between group I and II (Table 2), and also it differed significantly between women who continued their pregnancy and those who developed miscarriage (Figure 1). The same difference was observed between women who completed their pregnancy till 20 weeks and those who developed miscarriage within each group (Tables 3 and 4).

Using Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis with sensitivity of 80% and specificity 100%, an optimal cut-off criterion of CA-125 > 40.16 IU/ml would be used for prediction of occurrence of miscarriage (Figure 2). While, optimal cut-off criteria of CA-125 > 58 IU/ml for prediction of occurrence of miscarriage in patients with threatened miscarriage (group I) would be established with sensitivity of 78 % and specificity 97% (Table 5). Also in group II, with sensitivity of 80% and specificity 100%, optimal cut-off criteria of CA1-25 > 28.45 IU/ml was found for prediction of occurrence of miscarriage (Table 6).

DISCUSSION

Threatened miscarriage might be a very distressing condition for women, both physically and psychologically. Sometimes, bleeding due to threatened miscarriage may persist for days or weeks, making the prediction of the outcome of pregnancy very important to relieve the stress from both the patient and the physician. Ultrasonography together with several biochemical markers have been used to try to discriminate between normal and abnormal pregnancy.

Vaginal ultrasonography, serial measurements of β-HCG and progesterone titers have been used and proved to be helpful in predicting the presence of a healthy intra-uterine pregnancy [7]. However, their results turned out to be not a very satisfactory sensitive test in early pregnancy [8].

CA-125, being found to be expressed fetal membranes and maternal deciduas [5], has drawn attention as a possible useful biochemical marker for the prediction of pregnancy outcome in threatened miscarriage. Studying CA-125 as a possible marker for threatened miscarriage has lead to conflicting results. Several studies, in spite of finding its serum level higher in patients experiencing first trimester miscarriage, found these levels not statistically different from these in women who completed their pregnancies [8-12]. Some attributed this for single measurement of CA-125 when they found much more promising results using sequential measurement of CA-125 and found this to be a highly sensitive prognostic marker [12, 13]. Others found a single measurement of serum CA-125 to be valuable for women with symptoms of imminent abortion [7, 14]. Conversely, one study found serum CA-125 level significantly higher in women who completed their pregnancy [15].

A recent systematic review and meta-analysis suggested serum CA-125 to have ‘a high predictive value in identifying pregnancies that are ‘likely to continue’, it even suggested it to be clinically superior to the commonly used biochemical markers as β-HCG and progesterone in predicting the outcome of a pregnancy with healthy fetus [3]. The results of this study agree with this review in the value of CA-125 in the early prediction of pregnancy outcome in threatened miscarriage. Serum CA-125 showed significantly higher levels in women presenting with bleeding than those with normal pregnancy, and this supports the idea of CA-125 being released secondary to decidual disruption which was suggested by several other studies [16-18]. Also the findings of this study suggests that a single measurement of serum CA-125 is valuable in the prediction of miscarriage being significantly higher than in women with viable pregnancy even if experienced bleeding.

Few studies tried to calculate a discriminatory value for CA-125 to predict miscarriage. Using ROC curve analysis with sensitivity of 80% and specificity 100%, this study found optimal cut-off criteria of CA-125 > 40.16 IU/ml would be used for prediction of occurrence of miscarriage. While, in patients with threatened miscarriage, optimal cut-off criteria of CA-125 > 58 IU/ml would be used. These results were similar to those of two other studies [5, 14], while lower threshold level was suggested by a more recent study [19].

Table 1: Age, parity and gestational age at time of recruitment in the 2 groups.

Variable Group II (number=60) Group I (number=120) P value
Age (years) 26.5 (20 – 34) 28 (23 – 33) 0.311
Parity     0.481
P0 27 (45%) 50 (41.7%)
P1 8 (13.3%) 28 (23.3%)
P2 12 (20%) 27 (22.5%)
P3 or higher 13 (21.7%) 15 (12.5%)
   
   
Gestational age at recruitment (weeks) 9 (8 – 11) 10 (8 – 11) 0.582
Data are presented as median (inter-quartile range) or number (%).

Table 2: Comparison of serum CA-125 level between the 2 groups.

Variable Group II (n=60) Group I (n=120) P value
CA-125 at recruitment (IU/ml) 25.45 (23.45 – 26.3) 35.1 (33.54 – 40.16) <0.001
Data are presented as median (inter-quartile range).

Table 3: Serum CA-125 in group I.

  Threatened miscarriage (n=120)
Variable Continued pregnancy (n=90) Miscarriage (n=30) p-value
CA-125 U/ml 34.7 (32.0 – 36.5) 50.9 (49.0 – 58.2) <0.001
Data are presented as median (inter-quartile range).

Table 4: Serum CA-125 level in group II.

  Normal pregnancy (n=60)
Variable Continued pregnancy (n=54) Miscarriage (n=6) p-value
CA-125 U/ml 25.3 (23.4 – 26.3) 28.0 (27.4 – 28.0) <0.001
Data are presented as median (inter-quartile range).

Table 5: ROC curve for prediction of occurrence of miscarriage using CA-125 level in group I.

  Estimate 95% CI P value
Area under the ROC curve (AUC) 0.975 0.940 to 0.993 <0.0001
Youden index J 0.923 0.869 to 0.962  
Optimal cutoff criterion (IU/ml) >58 43.45 to 58.45  
Sensitivity (%) 78.95 86.3 - 96.2  
Specificity (%) 97.67 92.9 - 100.0  
+LR N/A N/A  
-LR 0.077 0.04 - 0.1  
+PV (%) 93.75 97.0 – 95.2  
-PV (%) 91.30 71.4 - 83.8  
Youden index (J) = (sensitivity + specificity) – 1; +LR = positive likelihood ratio; -LR = negative likelihood ratio; +PV = positive predictive value; -PV = negative predictive value; N/A = not applicable.

Table 6: ROC curve for prediction of occurrence of miscarriage using CA-125 level in group II.

  Estimate 95% CI P value
Area under the ROC curve (AUC) 0.975 0.940 to 0.993 <0.0001
Youden index J 0.923 0.869 to 0.962  
Optimal cutoff criterion (IU/ml) >28.45 26.4 to 28.45  
Sensitivity (%) 92.31 86.3 - 96.2  
Specificity (%) 100 92.9 - 100.0  
+LR N/A N/A  
-LR 0.077 0.04 - 0.1  
+PV (%) 100 97.0 - 100.0  
-PV (%) 83.3 71.4 - 91.8  
Youden index (J) = (sensitivity + specificity) – 1; +LR = positive likelihood ratio; -LR = negative likelihood ratio; +PV = positive predictive value; -PV = negative predictive value; N/A = not applicable.

 

CONCLUSION

Serum CA-125 seems to be a promising biomarker for the early prediction of miscarriage, still further studies are needed trying to combine its use with other biomarkers and ultrasonography for better accuracy and sensitivity.

REFERENCES

1. Osmanagaoglu MA, Karahan SC, Aran T, Güven S, Turgut E, Mentese A et al. The Diagnostic Value of β Human Chorionic Gonadotropin, Progesterone, and Ischemia-Modified Albumin and Their Combined Use in the Prediction of First Trimester Abortions. Int Scholarly Research Notices. 2014.

2. Rubio C, Simón C, Vidal F, Rodrigo L, Pehlivan T, Remohí J, Pellicer A . Chromosomal abnormalities and embryo development in recurrent miscarriage couples. Hum Reprod. 2003; 18: 182-188.

3. Pillai RN, Konje JC, Tincello DG, Potdar N. Role of serum biomarkers in the prediction of outcome in women with threatened miscarriage: a systematic review and diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2015.

4. Abdul-Hussein MM, Abdul-Rasheed OF, Al-Moayed HA . The Values of CA-125, Progesterone, ß-HCG and Estradiol in the Early Prediction of Ectopic Pregnancy. Oman Med J. 2012; 27: 124-128.

5. Katsikis I, Rousso D, Farmakiotis D, Kourtis A, Diamanti-Kandarakis E, Panidis D. Receiver operator characteristics and diagnostic value of progesterone and CA-125 in the prediction of ectopic and abortive intrauterine gestations. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006; 125: 226-232.

6. Check JH, Nowroozi K, Winkel CA, Johnson T, Seefried L . Serum CA 125 levels in early pregnancy and subsequent spontaneous abortion. Obstet Gynecol. 1990; 75: 742-744.

7. Ayaty S, Roudsari FV, Tavassoly F. CA-125 in normal pregnancy and threatened abortion. Iran J of Reprod Med. 2007; 5: 57-60.

8. Mahdi B. Estimation of CA-125 Level in First Trimester Threatened Abortion. The Internet J of Gynecol and Obstet. 2009; 12.

9. Hornstein MD, Check JH, Hill JA . Serum CA 125 levels and spontaneous abortion. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995; 172: 695-699.

10. Foth D, Römer T. Maternal CA 125 serum level in intrauterine pregnancy and abortion in the first trimester. Zentralbl Gynakol. 2000; 122: 217-221.

11. Bon GG, Kenemans P, Verstraeten AA, Go S, Philipi PA, van Kamp GJ, et al. Maternal serum Ca125 and Ca15-3 antigen levels in normal and pathological pregnancy. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2001; 16: 166-172.

12. Schmidt T, Rein DT, Foth D, Eibach HW, Kurbacher CM, Mallmann P, et al. Prognostic value of repeated serum CA 125 measurements in first trimester pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2001; 97: 168- 173.

13. Bhattacharya A, Pramanik SR, Saha R, Bhaswati das, Sen OM. Correlation of Serial Beta HCG Titre and CA125 Estimation In Predicting Early Pregnancy Failure. IOSR J of Pharm. 2015; 5: 16-20.

14. Fiegler P, Katz M, Kaminski K, Rudol G . Clinical value of a single serum CA-125 level in women with symptoms of imminent abortion during the first trimester of pregnancy. J Reprod Med. 2003; 48: 982-988.

15. Yamane Y, Takahashi K, Kitao M. Prognostic potential of serum CA125 and pregnant markers in threatened abortion. Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi. 1989; 41: 1999-2004.

16. Noci I, Biagiotti R, Periti E, Baronci D, Torricelli F, Cefalà L, et al. Maternal serum CA 125 levels in first trimester abortion. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1995; 60: 35-36.

17. Scarpellini F, Mastrone M, Sbracia M, Scarpellini L . Serum CA 125 and first trimester abortion. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1995; 49: 259-264.

18. Madendag Y, Col-Madendag I, Kanat-Pektas M, Danisman N. Predictive power of serum CA-125 and LDH in the outcome of first trimester pregnancies with human chorionic gonadotropin levels below discriminatory zone. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009; 279: 661-666.

19. Al-Mohamady M, Abdel-Fattah G, Elkattan E, Bayoumy R, Hamed DA. Correlation of Serum CA-125 and Progesterone Levels with Ultrasound Markers in the Prediction of Pregnancy Outcome in Threatened Miscarriage. Int J of Fert and Sterility. 2016; 9: 506-511.

Sweed MS, Sammour HM, Bakr AA (2016) Serum CA-125 for Early Prediction of Miscarriage. Med J Obstet Gynecol 4(1): 1077.

Received : 21 Jan 2016
Accepted : 11 Feb 2016
Published : 18 Feb 2016
Journals
Annals of Otolaryngology and Rhinology
ISSN : 2379-948X
Launched : 2014
JSM Schizophrenia
Launched : 2016
Journal of Nausea
Launched : 2020
JSM Internal Medicine
Launched : 2016
JSM Hepatitis
Launched : 2016
JSM Oro Facial Surgeries
ISSN : 2578-3211
Launched : 2016
Journal of Human Nutrition and Food Science
ISSN : 2333-6706
Launched : 2013
JSM Regenerative Medicine and Bioengineering
ISSN : 2379-0490
Launched : 2013
JSM Spine
ISSN : 2578-3181
Launched : 2016
Archives of Palliative Care
ISSN : 2573-1165
Launched : 2016
JSM Nutritional Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3203
Launched : 2017
Annals of Neurodegenerative Disorders
ISSN : 2476-2032
Launched : 2016
Journal of Fever
ISSN : 2641-7782
Launched : 2017
JSM Bone Marrow Research
ISSN : 2578-3351
Launched : 2016
JSM Mathematics and Statistics
ISSN : 2578-3173
Launched : 2014
Journal of Autoimmunity and Research
ISSN : 2573-1173
Launched : 2014
JSM Arthritis
ISSN : 2475-9155
Launched : 2016
JSM Head and Neck Cancer-Cases and Reviews
ISSN : 2573-1610
Launched : 2016
JSM General Surgery Cases and Images
ISSN : 2573-1564
Launched : 2016
JSM Anatomy and Physiology
ISSN : 2573-1262
Launched : 2016
JSM Dental Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1548
Launched : 2016
Annals of Emergency Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1017
Launched : 2016
Annals of Mens Health and Wellness
ISSN : 2641-7707
Launched : 2017
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Health Care
ISSN : 2576-0084
Launched : 2018
Journal of Chronic Diseases and Management
ISSN : 2573-1300
Launched : 2016
Annals of Vaccines and Immunization
ISSN : 2378-9379
Launched : 2014
JSM Heart Surgery Cases and Images
ISSN : 2578-3157
Launched : 2016
Annals of Reproductive Medicine and Treatment
ISSN : 2573-1092
Launched : 2016
JSM Brain Science
ISSN : 2573-1289
Launched : 2016
JSM Biomarkers
ISSN : 2578-3815
Launched : 2014
JSM Biology
ISSN : 2475-9392
Launched : 2016
Archives of Stem Cell and Research
ISSN : 2578-3580
Launched : 2014
Annals of Clinical and Medical Microbiology
ISSN : 2578-3629
Launched : 2014
JSM Pediatric Surgery
ISSN : 2578-3149
Launched : 2017
Journal of Memory Disorder and Rehabilitation
ISSN : 2578-319X
Launched : 2016
JSM Tropical Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2578-3165
Launched : 2016
JSM Head and Face Medicine
ISSN : 2578-3793
Launched : 2016
JSM Cardiothoracic Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1297
Launched : 2016
JSM Bone and Joint Diseases
ISSN : 2578-3351
Launched : 2017
JSM Bioavailability and Bioequivalence
ISSN : 2641-7812
Launched : 2017
JSM Atherosclerosis
ISSN : 2573-1270
Launched : 2016
Journal of Genitourinary Disorders
ISSN : 2641-7790
Launched : 2017
Journal of Fractures and Sprains
ISSN : 2578-3831
Launched : 2016
Journal of Autism and Epilepsy
ISSN : 2641-7774
Launched : 2016
Annals of Marine Biology and Research
ISSN : 2573-105X
Launched : 2014
JSM Health Education & Primary Health Care
ISSN : 2578-3777
Launched : 2016
JSM Communication Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3807
Launched : 2016
Annals of Musculoskeletal Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3599
Launched : 2016
Annals of Virology and Research
ISSN : 2573-1122
Launched : 2014
JSM Renal Medicine
ISSN : 2573-1637
Launched : 2016
Journal of Muscle Health
ISSN : 2578-3823
Launched : 2016
JSM Genetics and Genomics
ISSN : 2334-1823
Launched : 2013
JSM Anxiety and Depression
ISSN : 2475-9139
Launched : 2016
Clinical Journal of Heart Diseases
ISSN : 2641-7766
Launched : 2016
Annals of Medicinal Chemistry and Research
ISSN : 2378-9336
Launched : 2014
JSM Pain and Management
ISSN : 2578-3378
Launched : 2016
JSM Women's Health
ISSN : 2578-3696
Launched : 2016
Clinical Research in HIV or AIDS
ISSN : 2374-0094
Launched : 2013
Journal of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Obesity
ISSN : 2333-6692
Launched : 2013
Journal of Substance Abuse and Alcoholism
ISSN : 2373-9363
Launched : 2013
JSM Neurosurgery and Spine
ISSN : 2373-9479
Launched : 2013
Journal of Liver and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2379-0830
Launched : 2014
Journal of Drug Design and Research
ISSN : 2379-089X
Launched : 2014
JSM Clinical Oncology and Research
ISSN : 2373-938X
Launched : 2013
JSM Bioinformatics, Genomics and Proteomics
ISSN : 2576-1102
Launched : 2014
JSM Chemistry
ISSN : 2334-1831
Launched : 2013
Journal of Trauma and Care
ISSN : 2573-1246
Launched : 2014
JSM Surgical Oncology and Research
ISSN : 2578-3688
Launched : 2016
Annals of Food Processing and Preservation
ISSN : 2573-1033
Launched : 2016
Journal of Radiology and Radiation Therapy
ISSN : 2333-7095
Launched : 2013
JSM Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
ISSN : 2578-3572
Launched : 2016
Annals of Clinical Pathology
ISSN : 2373-9282
Launched : 2013
Annals of Cardiovascular Diseases
ISSN : 2641-7731
Launched : 2016
Journal of Behavior
ISSN : 2576-0076
Launched : 2016
Annals of Clinical and Experimental Metabolism
ISSN : 2572-2492
Launched : 2016
Clinical Research in Infectious Diseases
ISSN : 2379-0636
Launched : 2013
JSM Microbiology
ISSN : 2333-6455
Launched : 2013
Journal of Urology and Research
ISSN : 2379-951X
Launched : 2014
Journal of Family Medicine and Community Health
ISSN : 2379-0547
Launched : 2013
Annals of Pregnancy and Care
ISSN : 2578-336X
Launched : 2017
JSM Cell and Developmental Biology
ISSN : 2379-061X
Launched : 2013
Annals of Aquaculture and Research
ISSN : 2379-0881
Launched : 2014
Clinical Research in Pulmonology
ISSN : 2333-6625
Launched : 2013
Journal of Immunology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2333-6714
Launched : 2013
Annals of Forensic Research and Analysis
ISSN : 2378-9476
Launched : 2014
JSM Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
ISSN : 2333-7109
Launched : 2013
Annals of Breast Cancer Research
ISSN : 2641-7685
Launched : 2016
Annals of Gerontology and Geriatric Research
ISSN : 2378-9409
Launched : 2014
Journal of Sleep Medicine and Disorders
ISSN : 2379-0822
Launched : 2014
JSM Burns and Trauma
ISSN : 2475-9406
Launched : 2016
Chemical Engineering and Process Techniques
ISSN : 2333-6633
Launched : 2013
Annals of Clinical Cytology and Pathology
ISSN : 2475-9430
Launched : 2014
JSM Allergy and Asthma
ISSN : 2573-1254
Launched : 2016
Journal of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
ISSN : 2334-2307
Launched : 2013
Annals of Sports Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2379-0571
Launched : 2014
JSM Sexual Medicine
ISSN : 2578-3718
Launched : 2016
Annals of Vascular Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2378-9344
Launched : 2014
JSM Biotechnology and Biomedical Engineering
ISSN : 2333-7117
Launched : 2013
Journal of Hematology and Transfusion
ISSN : 2333-6684
Launched : 2013
JSM Environmental Science and Ecology
ISSN : 2333-7141
Launched : 2013
Journal of Cardiology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2333-6676
Launched : 2013
JSM Nanotechnology and Nanomedicine
ISSN : 2334-1815
Launched : 2013
Journal of Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders
ISSN : 2475-9473
Launched : 2016
JSM Ophthalmology
ISSN : 2333-6447
Launched : 2013
Journal of Pharmacology and Clinical Toxicology
ISSN : 2333-7079
Launched : 2013
Annals of Psychiatry and Mental Health
ISSN : 2374-0124
Launched : 2013
Annals of Pediatrics and Child Health
ISSN : 2373-9312
Launched : 2013
JSM Clinical Pharmaceutics
ISSN : 2379-9498
Launched : 2014
JSM Foot and Ankle
ISSN : 2475-9112
Launched : 2016
JSM Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementia
ISSN : 2378-9565
Launched : 2014
Journal of Addiction Medicine and Therapy
ISSN : 2333-665X
Launched : 2013
Journal of Veterinary Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2378-931X
Launched : 2013
Annals of Public Health and Research
ISSN : 2378-9328
Launched : 2014
Annals of Orthopedics and Rheumatology
ISSN : 2373-9290
Launched : 2013
Journal of Clinical Nephrology and Research
ISSN : 2379-0652
Launched : 2014
Annals of Community Medicine and Practice
ISSN : 2475-9465
Launched : 2014
Annals of Biometrics and Biostatistics
ISSN : 2374-0116
Launched : 2013
JSM Clinical Case Reports
ISSN : 2373-9819
Launched : 2013
Journal of Cancer Biology and Research
ISSN : 2373-9436
Launched : 2013
Journal of Surgery and Transplantation Science
ISSN : 2379-0911
Launched : 2013
Journal of Dermatology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2373-9371
Launched : 2013
JSM Gastroenterology and Hepatology
ISSN : 2373-9487
Launched : 2013
Annals of Nursing and Practice
ISSN : 2379-9501
Launched : 2014
JSM Dentistry
ISSN : 2333-7133
Launched : 2013
Author Information X