Loading

Medical Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Serum Ferritin Assessment is Comparable with Hemoglobin to Predict Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes

Research Article | Open Access | Volume 6 | Issue 2

  • 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, China
+ Show More - Show Less
Corresponding Authors
Li-zhou Sun, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Province, 210029, China, Tel: 8613605171213.
Abstract

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether serum ferritin (SF) in second trimester and hemoglobin (Hb) in third trimester and can be used to predict adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Methods: Retrospective study was performed on 565 women who qualified for this study between April and June 2016. Statistical analyses for iron marker status and pregnancy outcomes were tested using the Student’s t-test and the x2-test.

Results: Prevalence of iron deficiency anemia (IDA) at time of delivery was higher (21.8%) than second trimester (14.3%). Patients with IDA at time of delivery were more likely to have lower hemoglobin (Hb) concentrations and had iron depletion (ID) in second trimester of pregnancy compared to normal group. IDA group, but not ID group, tend to have lower BMI and were more likely to suffer post-partum hemorrhage. Higher prevalence of postpartum hemorrhage was found in patients with normal iron stores in second trimester of pregnancy. IDA and ID group had significantly lower birth weight. In contrast, the rates of patients with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) were found significantly higher in the control group compared with IDA group.

Conclusion: SF testing in second trimester of pregnancy is comparable with Hb as proxy to predict adverse pregnancy outcomes. Maternal IDA and ID correlated with adverse pregnancy outcomes, no matter how “mild” the anemia is. Regarding lower prevalence of GDM in the anemic group, this should not be interpreted as evidence against iron supplementation for correction of maternal anemia.

Citation

Chandra I, Sun L (2018) Serum Ferritin Assessment is Comparable With Hemoglobin to Predict Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes. Med J Obstet Gynecol 6(2): 1121.

Keywords
  • Hemoglobin
  • Iron deficiency anemia
  • Pregnancy outcomes
  • Serum ferritin
INTRODUCTION

According to World Health Organization (WHO), around 2 billion people, amounting to over 30% of the world’s population are anemic, although prevalence rates are variable because of differences in socioeconomic conditions, lifestyles, food habits, and rates of communicable and non-communicable diseases [1]. Iron deficiency is the most common cause of anemia and is the most widespread nutritional disorder in the world [2,3]. Pregnant women are a high risk group for iron deficiency anemia (IDA) given the iron requirements of the growing baby and those of gravid mother. IDA is associated with negative outcomes for both mother and infant. There are higher risk of infections and hemorrhage which lead to maternal mortality. There also increased risk of low birth weight of the newborn, premature birth, birth asphyxia, lower Apgar score, or less cognitive development of the child [4-7]. Early iron deficiency is characterized by diminished iron stores. This becomes iron depletion (ID) when iron stores are absent. Clinical diagnosis of ID through sampling of bone marrow to identify the absence of body iron stores is impractical in most cases. Serum ferritin (SF) concentrations are the most commonly deployed indicator for determining ID, and low SF concentrations reflect a state of ID [8]. Many women of child-bearing age have depleted iron stores. Throughout Europe and other industrialized countries between 11 and 45% of women of fertile age have been reported to have serum SF concentrations ranging between 10 and 17 mg/l [9], indicating minimal or absent iron stores. ID has been associated with reduced exercise capacity, impaired temperature regulation and impaired cognitive function in animal and human studies [10]. IDA represents the late stage of iron depletion. It occurs as tissue and cellular stores are progressively exhausted. Although mild or moderate iron deficiency and or anemia may be asymptomatic, there are a variety of blood iron indicators that exist to detect early stages of disease. The most widely used method for diagnosis of IDA is estimation of Hb and SF because of the low cost and efficiency. The guidelines suggest ferritin in testing for non-anaemic women defined at risk i.e. those with previous anemia in pregnancy, multiparity (>3), consecutive pregnancy, vegetarians, teenage pregnancies, recent history of bleeding, and finally those where estimation of iron stores is necessary as significant blood loss may occur. SF is superior to transferrin saturation or serum iron in the diagnosis of IDA as its concentration correlates with bone marrow iron stores. Also, even with iron deficiency, serum iron can be high or normal if the pregnant female is on oral iron [11]. A complete blood count is a much less expensive test and is routinely performed all over the world. In china, not all hospital perform SF test routinely, because it is too expensive to be done in all case. The purpose of our study was to investigate whether indicator of iron status in second trimester of pregnancy, which is SF in this study, combined with Hb, can be used to predict adverse pregnancy outcomes.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This study was retrospective observational study. Approval was obtained from the institutional review board of Jiangsu Province Hospital. A manual search was performed through electronic medical record of Jiangsu Province Hospital from April 2016 to June 2016. Our inclusion criteria were: 1.Women who delivered in our hospital between April 2016 to June 2015, 2. Pregnant women who did first complete blood count (CBC) test in second trimester pregnancy, 3. CRP< 20 mg/L in second trimester pregnancy. Exclusion criteria include: 1.Multiple pregnancy, 2.Patient with Hb< 100mg/dL at time of delivery, 3.Chronic inflammatory diseases (ie, lupus, inflammatory bowel disease), 4.Patient who loss to follow up. Among 565 women who meet our study criteria, we divided into four groups: anemic group (IDA), non-anemic group (N), normal iron stores group (NIS), and iron depleted group (ID). IDA and N group were based on Hb test at third trimester of pregnancy, especially at time of delivery. NID and ID group were based on ferritin test in second trimester of pregnancy.

Maternal and neonatal aspects, also pregnancy outcomes, were analyzed for differences. Maternal characteristics include age, abortion history, gestational age, gravidity, parity, last delivery, blood pressure, and BMI. Maternal comorbidity and pregnancy outcomes include: gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), caesarean scar pregnancy, hypertension, preterm delivery, premature rupture of membrane, mode of delivery, postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), and postpartum fever. Neonatal outcomes include fetal birth weight, APGAR score, and NICU transfer.

Gestational age was determined from the date of last menstrual period when reliable and sonographic confirmation carried out the first 20 weeks of gestation and/or the first trimester sonographic measurement of crown lump length. H is defined as a blood loss of greater than 500 mL after vaginal delivery or greater than 1,000 mL after a cesarean section. Detailed records of prenatal histories were gathered through electronic medical records. Anemia in pregnancy was defined by a Hb value less than 110 mg/dL based on World Health Organization’s definition. In this study we only included patients with Hb 100-109 mg/dL. SF reflects iron stores and is the test to diagnose iron deficiency. We use a cutoff point of 20 ng/mL to classify the women in the study as having sufficient or insufficient iron deposits for pregnancy [12]. Iron depleted status defined as SF< 20 ng/mL and Hb ≥ 110mg/dL. In this study women were classified into four groups: non-anemic group (Hb ≥ 110mg/dL), anemic group (Hb 100-109mg/dL), normal iron stores (SF >20 ng/mL and Hb ≥ 110mg/dL), and depleted iron stores (<20 ng/ mL and Hb ≥ 110 mg/dL)

Statistical Analysis

The data were collected using Microsoft Excel 2007 (Window XP; Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA, USA). All statistical analysis was performed using statistical software package SPSS version 20.0 (SPSS Inc.). Data were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation or rate (%). Statistical calculations and correlation were performed with the chi square test for categorical variables, Student’s t-test for continuous variables. A two sided p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

From total 565 women who qualified for this study, we identified that almost half of our patients had iron depleted status at second trimester where they first did the antenatal check-up (n= 277/565, 49%), but only approximately one fifth of them had anemic condition (Hb 100-109 mg/dL) at that time (n= 81/565,14.3%). At time of delivery, we identified 123 (21.80%) women with anemic condition and 442 (78.20%) women with normal Hb level.

Table (1) showed correlation between Hb level at time of delivery with iron marker status in second trimester of pregnancy. Patients who developed anemic condition at time of delivery were more likely to have lower Hb concentrations (114.92 ± 7.51 vs 119.88 ± 7.93, p< 0.05) and had iron depleted status in second trimester of pregnancy (64.2% vs 44.8%, p< 0.05) compared to normal group.

Table (2) showed maternal characteristics between four groups which were similar, with no significant differences in maternal age, history of abortion , gestational age at delivery, gravidity, systolic blood pressure, and diastolic blood pressure( p> 0.05). There were significance differences in terms of parity (0.25 ± 0.43 vs 0.37 ± 0.51, p< 0.05) and time since last delivery (1.49 ± 3.02 vs 2.20 ± 3.16, p< 0.05), between N-IDA group, also NIS-ID group (0.23 ± 0.40 vs 0.32 ± 0.47, p< 0.05; 1.35 ± 2.80 vs 1.95 ± 3.31, p< 0.05). N group had higher BMI (24.31 ± 2.84 vs 23.69 ± 2.96, p< 0.05) compared to IDA group. In contrast, there were no significance difference between maternal BMI when ferritin test (NF-ID group) were used (p> 0.05).

Maternal comorbidity and pregnancy outcomes are shown in Table (3). There were no significant difference between patients with history of caesarean section and hypertensive disorders within N-IDA group and NIS-ID group (p> 0.05). In contrast, the rates of patients with gestational diabetes mellitus were found significantly higher in the N group compared to IDA group (27.8% vs 16.3% , p< 0.05), which didn’t occur in NIS-ID group (26.04% vs 24.55%, p> 0.05). Regarding pregnancy outcomes, pregnant women in IDA group were more likely to suffer post-partum hemorrhage compared to N group (13.8% vs 5.4%, p< 0.05). When ferritin test were used, pregnant women with normal iron stores were more likely to suffer post-partum hemorrhage than pregnant women with iron depleted status (9.38% vs 5.05%, p< 0.05). No significance differences between rates of preterm delivery, PROM, mode of delivery, and postpartum fever between four groups (p> 0.05).

From the aspect of neonatal outcomes (Table 4), infants in IDA group had a significantly lower birth weight compared with N group (3466.28 ± 429.54 vs 3378.08 ± 417.61, p< 0.05), as well as infants from ID group which showed significantly lower birth weight compared to mother with NIS group (3449.65 ± 418.20 vs 3346.91 ± 419.11, p< 0.05). In the other hand, no significant differences were observed in terms of APGAR score, amniotic staining fluid rate, and NICU transfer rate between N-IDA group and NIS-ID group (p> 0.05).

Table 1: Correlation between Hb level at time of delivery with iron marker status in second trimester of pregnancy.

Iron status, mean ± SD or n (%) N (n=442) IDA (n=123)   p
Hb, mg/dL 119.88 ± 7.93 114.92 ± 7.51 0.00
Hematocrite 0.07 ± 0.33 0.05 ± 0.14 0.51
Iron depleted 198 (44.80) 79 (64.20) 0.00
Transferrin, g/L 3.82 ± 1.70 3.99 ± 0.67 0.28 
Abbreviations: HB, Hemoglobin; IDA, Iron Deficieny Anemia; N, Normal Group; SD, Standard Deviation

Table 2: Maternal characteristics between N, IDA, NIS, and ID group.

Mean ± SD or n (%) N (n=442) IDA (n=123)   p NIS (n=288) ID (n=277)   p
Age, y 29.38 ± 4.13 28.74 ± 4.19 0.13 29.23 ± 4.10 29.25 ± 4.21 0.95
Abortion history 159 (36) 42 (34.10) 0.70 99(34.40) 102(36.80) 0.54
GA, w 39.35 ± 1.31 39.37 ± 1.24 0.86 39.35 ± 1.37 39.36 ± 1.22 0.93
 G 1.80 ± 1.07 1.95 ± 1.18 0.18 1.76 ± 1.01 1.91 ± 1.17 0.09
 P 0.25 ± 0.43 0.37 ± 0.51 0.01 0.23 ± 0.40 0.32 ± 0.47 0.02
LD, y 1.49 ± 3.02 2.20 ± 3.16 0.02 1.35 ± 2.80 1.95 ± 3.31 0.02
SBP, mmHg 115.49 ± 9.33 114.56 ± 9.77 0.33 115.80 ± 9.63 114.75 ± 9.21 0.18
DBP, mmHg 68.64 ± 8.51 67.83 ± 8.32 0.34 68.64 ± 8.37 68.30 ± 8.60 0.62
BMI, kg/m² 24.31 ± 2.84 23.69 ± 2.96 0.03 24.16 ± 3.00 24.19 ± 2.76 0.89
Abbreviations: BMI: Body Mass Index; DBP: Diastolic Blood Pressure; G: Gravidity; GA: Gestational Age; ID: Iron Deficiency; IDA: Iron Deficicieny Anemia; LD: Last Delivery; N: Normal; NIS: Normal Iron Store; P: Parity; SBP: Systolic Blood Pressure; SD: Standard Deviation.

Table 3: Maternal comorbidity and pregnancy outcomes between N, IDA, NIS, and ID group.

n (%) N (n=442) IDA (n=123)   p NIS (n=288) ID (n=277)   p
GDM 123( 27.8) 20 (16.3) 0.00 75(26.04) 68(24.55) 0.68
Caesarean scar pregnancy 36 (8.1) 14 (11.4) 0.26 25(8.68) 25(9.03) 0.88
Hypertension 12 (2.7) 5 (4.1) 0.43 7(2.43) 10(3.61) 0.41
Preterm 13 (2.9) 1 (0.8) 0.17 7(2.43) 7(2.53) 0.94
PROM 89 (20.1) 31 (25.2) 0.22 61(21.18) 59(21.30) 0.97
MOD            
Normal 308 (69.7) 81 (65.9) 0.63 196(68.01) 193(69.68) 0.55
CS 134 (30.3) 42 (34.1)   92(31.20) 84(30.32)  
PPH 24 (5.4) 17 (13.8) 0.00 27(9.38) 14(5.05) 0.04
Postpartum fever 29 (6.6) 5 (4.1) 0.30 19(6.60) 15(5.42) 0.55
Abbreviations: CS: Caesarean Section; GDM: Gestational Diabetes Mellitus; ID: Iron Depletion; IDA: Iron Deficiency Anemia; MOD: Mode of Delivery; N: Normal; NIS: Normal Iron Store; PPH: Post-Partum Hemorrhage; PROM: Premature Rupture Of Membrane.

 

DISCUSSION

The present study assessed, SF (iron depleted or non-depleted) in second trimester versus Hb (anemic or non-anemic) in third trimester, in order to investigate their correlation with adverse pregnancy outcomes. As far as we are aware, there are no studies in humans on the effect of second trimester gestational depleted iron stores without anemia on adverse pregnancy outcomes. Anemia in pregnancy is a worldwide problem. WHO/ CDC technical guidance based on systematic review evidence showed that in the absence of infections, SF or serum transferrin receptor (sTfr) in combination with Hb provides the best approach to measuring iron status. However, sTfr is not widely available or used in clinical practice in many countries [13]. Our study includes only Hb and SF in order to investigate their importance in development of anemic condition especially in late pregnancy. The SF measure identifies a deficient iron status earlier than other biomarkers, such as Transferrin saturation and Hb, identifying without error the subjects without iron stores as it does not have false negatives [14]. Because SF increases not only with the iron content of the organism but also with acute or chronic inflammation, malignancy or liver disease [15], pregnant women with these conditions were excluded from this analysis. The WHO recommends that pregnant women take daily oral iron–folic acid (IFA) supplementation as part of antenatal care to reduce the risk of low birth weight, maternal anemia, and ID [16]. According to regulations of our hospital, all pregnant women are supplemented with multiple micronutrient supplementation containing 60 mg of iron. Only pregnant women with Hb 100-109 mg/dL were included in this analysis based on our hypothesis that no additional iron supplementation needed for “these” Hb level. An adequate iron status during pregnancy implies body iron reserves of at least 500mg or SF concentrations higher than 70ug/L at conception, but only 15% to 20% of women have reserves of such magnitude [7].

Our study showed that the prevalence of pregnant women with IDA was higher among third trimester (21.8%) than second trimester (14.3%). Our study also showed that patients who developed anemic condition at time of delivery were more likely to have lower Hb concentrations and had iron depleted status in second trimester of pregnancy compared to normal group (p< 0.05). In our hospital, ferritin test only be done once, which is for pregnant women who decide to deliver in our hospital, usually in second trimester. Based on the result, ferritin test can be done more frequently in order to prevent iron depletion “fall” into IDA. This suggests Hb and SF can be used as a proxy to predict development of iron deficiency anemia later in the third trimester of pregnancy, especially at the time of delivery.

Regarding maternal characteristics, our study showed that IDA group tends to have lower BMI compared to normal group. Our findings were similar with the one reported by Rasmussen, S et al. [17], Research conducted by Charles, A.M et al. showed that pregnant women with a BMI of 25–29 were 60% less likely to be anemic than those with a BMI less than 25 [18]. Anemia is considered one of the main nutritional deficiency disorders affecting a large fraction of the population not only in developing but also in developed countries. Lack of education about the importance of intake of balanced and iron-rich diet contribute to it. Obstetricians have an important role to play by making women aware of the importance of a balanced diet, because it would lower the risk of the women having low body weight when they begin to have children, thus making them less likely to become anemic [19]. However, we observed no significant differences in BMI between iron depleted and normal iron store group. SF is an acute phase reactant and is potentially higher in any infective or inflammatory process. Previous studies have concluded that overweight and obese people are in a state of an ongoing subclinical inflammation that can secondarily lead to more catastrophic events like iron deficiency [20,21]. Study by Khan, A et al. found that people with BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 had significant higher ferritin level than BMI 18-25kg/m2 [22]. The mean BMI pregnant women in our study were still in normal range (NIS vs ID group: 24.16 ± 3.00 vs 24.19 ± 2.76). Also, there was no classification of high ferritin group in this study. This explained why there’s no correlation between BMI and iron stores in our study.

In contrast, we found that pregnant women with IDA were significantly having lower prevalence of GDM. Our findings suggest that the decreased prevalence of GDM in women with IDA is likely to be consequent to the combined effects of iron deficiency, which also reflected nutritional deficiency in general and reduced gestational weight gain. Analysis on 736 pregnant women conducted by Lao and Ho, LF also showed that the likelihood of GDM is significantly reduced with maternal IDA [23]. Based on iron stores, no significant differences between prevalence of GDM from pregnant women with normal iron stores and iron-depleted status. SF is postulated to be involved in diabetogenesis as a marker of iron stores. Several studies have shown that excess deposition of iron, indicated by elevated ferritin levels, may cause elevated insulin levels by suppressing hepatic glucose production in the liver, interfering with insulin synthesis and secretion in the pancreas, and decreasing glucose uptake in the muscle [24-26]. Those accumulations may lead to insulin resistance and beta cell function impairment and result in the development of type 2 diabetes. In prospective cohort study of 1456 healthy pregnant women conducted by Chen, X et al., found that women who developed GDM had a higher concentration of serum ferritin than women who did not develop GDM [27]. Again, because there were no classification of high ferritin group on this study, we found no correlation between iron stores and prevalence of GDM.

Our study found that IDA significantly increased prevalence of PPH. These results showed even “slight” decreased in Hb level could lead to maternal morbidity. In contrast, pregnant women with normal iron store at second trimester of pregnancy were more likely to suffer postpartum hemorrhage. This result could be related with our sample which weren’t large enough. Prospective study on 467 low risk mothers by Lao, et al., found no correlation between postpartum hemorrhage and SF level at gestational age 28-30 weeks [28].

No significant correlation was found between IDA and preterm birth. The possible explanation is that we only included patient with Hb level between 100-109 mg/dL into our study, which we believed not enough to reach significance. Our findings consistent with cohort study of 160.700 patients by Zhang, Q et al., although they used different cut-off point (Hb< 10 g/dL) [29]. Study by Marti, A et al., however, showed that maternal anemia was found to be significantly associated with prematurity [30]. Large retrospective analysis of 96,066 deliveries conducted by Drukker, L et al., also showed that anemia at birth was significantly associated with preterm delivery [31].

In this study we found no correlation between iron depleted status with preterm birth. In contrast, study by Bhutta, A.T et al., have shown preterm infants born from iron depleted mother are associated with short- and long-term adverse health consequences including an increased risk of infant mortality, as well as increased risk of cognitive dysfunction and CVD later in life [32]. Iron supplementation is necessary to prevent iron deficiency in preterm infants. Preterm infants certainly require more iron, both in absolute amount and on a per kilogram bodyweight basis, than full-term infants because their iron stores are lower at birth and their total body iron content has to increase at a greater rate postnatally [33].

Regarding neonatal outcomes, as expected neonatal in the anemic group had statistically significant lower birth weight compared to control group (p<0.05). A retrospective population-based study of 153.396 deliveries by Levy A et al., also showed significant association between maternal anemia and rates of low birth weight [34]. Low iron status in second trimester of pregnancy were found to be associated with low birth weight, which is consistent with study by Scholl, TO [35].

Limitation of this study is that the time of anemia diagnoses were recorded but not the true onset of anemia in the prenatal maternity logbook. SF test is not a routine in our hospital, so no follow up were documented especially in pregnant women with low iron store. The other limitation of this study is its retrospective nature, and our findings should be confirmed with larger prospective studies.

Table 4: Neonatal outcomes between N, IDA, NIS, and ID group.

Means ± SD or n (%) N (n=442) IDA (n=123)   p NIS (n=288) ID (n=277)   p
Fetal birth weight, g 3466.28 ± 429.54 3378.08 ± 417.61 0.04  3449.65 ± 418.20 3346.91 ± 419.11 0.00 
APGAR 1’ 9.98 ± 0.15 9.91 ± 0.53 0.16 9.91 ± 0.57 9.94 ± .34 0.53
APGAR 5’ 9.99 ± 0.09 9.95 ± 0.30 0.16 9.96 ± 0.30 9.96 ± 0.24 0.94
Amniotic fluid staining 77(17.4) 16(13) 0.24 50(17.40) 43(15.50) 0.55
NICU transfer 31(7) 3(2.4) 0.059 16(5.6) 18(6.5) 0.64
Abbreviations: ID: Iron Deficiency; IDA: Iron Deficiency Anemia; N: Normal; NICU: Neonatal Intensive Care Unit; NIS: Normal Iron Store; SD: Standard Deviation.

 

CONCLUSION

Iron deficiency during pregnancy continues to be a common clinical problem and is one of the most prevalent nutritional deficits both in the industrial and developing countries. Based on results of our study, we believe that SF and Hb testing in second and third trimester can be used as proxy to predict development of iron deficiency anemia later in third trimester of pregnancy, especially at the time of delivery. SF can be done frequently in third trimester as follow up in pregnant women who had low iron store. We realized that Hb was the most effective and costfriendly test to detect IDA, so we recommend SF test in high risk pregnant women. Once again, as stated in the literature, our study showed that maternal IDA correlated with adverse pregnancy outcomes, included lower birth weight and higher rate of post-partum hemorrhage, no matter how “mild” the anemia is. We believe that maintaining a healthy body weight, and frequently visiting an antenatal clinic, will help to lower the prevalence of anemia. Although in this study there were negative correlation between iron depleted status and postpartum hemorrhage, SF remains an important indicator of iron status. Starting pregnancy with good iron status can pre-empt adverse pregnancy outcomes. Regarding lower prevalence of GDM in the anemic group, this should not be interpreted as evidence against iron supplementation for correction of maternal anemia, the importance of which is indisputable.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

LZS: corresponding author, manuscript editing. IC: data collection, analysis, writing manuscript, manuscript editing.

REFERENCES

1. Gangopadhyay R, Karoshi M, Keith L. Anemia and pregnancy: A link to maternal chronic diseases. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2011; 115: 11-15.

2. Imdad A, Bhutta ZA. Routine iron/folate supplementation during pregnancy: effect on maternal anaemia and birth outcomes. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2012; 26:168-177.

3. Khalafallah AA, Dennis AE. Iron deficiency anaemia in pregnancy and postpartum: pathophysiology and effect of oral versus intravenous iron therapy. J pregnancy. 2012; 630519.

4. Arija V, Fargas F, March G, Abajo S, Basora J, Canals J, et al. Adapting iron dose supplementation in pregnancy for greater effectiveness on mother and child health: protocol of the ECLIPSES randomized clinical trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014; 14: 33.

5. Barroso F, Allard S, Kahan BC, Connolly C, Smethurst H, Choo L, et al. Prevalence of maternal anaemia and its predictors: a multi-centre study. Eur J obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011; 159: 99-105.

6. Haider BA, Yakoob MY, Bhutta ZA. Effect of multiple micronutrient supplementation during pregnancy on maternal and birth outcomes. BMC Public Health. 2011; 11: 19.

7. Vandevijvere S, Amsalkhir S, Van Oyen H, Egli I, Moreno-Reyes R. Iron status and its determinants in a nationally representative sample of pregnant women. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2013; 113: 659-666.

8. Daru J, Colman K, Stanworth SJ, De La Salle B, Wood EM, Pasricha SR. Serum ferritin as an indicator of iron status: what do we need to know? Am J Clin Nutr. 2017; 106: 1634-1639.

9. Hallberg L. Results of surveys to assess iron status in Europe. Nutr Rev. 1995; 53: 314-22.

10. McMahon LP. Iron deficiency in pregnancy. Obstetric Med. 2010; 3: 17-24.

11. Scholl TO. High third-trimester ferritin concentration: associations with very preterm delivery, infection, and maternal nutritional status. Obstet Gynecol. 1998; 92: 161-166

12. Aranda N, Ribot B, Garcia E, Viteri FE, Arija V. Pre-pregnancy iron reserves, iron supplementation during pregnancy, and birth weight. Early Hum Dev. 2011; 87: 791-797.

13. Rukuni R, Knight M, Murphy MF, Roberts D, Stanworth SJ. Screening for iron deficiency and iron deficiency anaemia in pregnancy: a structured review and gap analysis against UK national screening criteria. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015; 15: 269.

14. Ribot B, Aranda N, Viteri F, Hernandez-Martinez C, Canals J, Arija V. Depleted iron stores without anaemia early in pregnancy carries increased risk of lower birthweight even when supplemented daily with moderate iron. Hum Reprod. 2012; 27: 1260-1266.

15. Zimmermann MB. Methods to assess iron and iodine status. Br J Nutr. 2008; 99: 2-9.

16. Mei Z, Serdula MK, Liu JM, Flores-Ayala RC, Wang L, Ye R, et al. Ironcontaining micronutrient supplementation of Chinese women with no or mild anemia during pregnancy improved iron status but did not affect perinatal anemia. J Nutr. 2014; 144: 943-948.

17. Rasmussen S, Bergsjo P, Jacobsen G, Haram K, Bakketeig LS. Haemoglobin and serum ferritin in pregnancy--correlation with smoking and body mass index. European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology. 2005; 123: 27-34.

18. Charles AM, Campbell-Stennett D, Yatich N, Jolly PE. Predictors of anemia among pregnant women in Westmoreland, Jamaica. Health Care women Int. 2010; 31: 585-598.

19. Lone FW, Qureshi RN, Emanuel F. Maternal anaemia and its impact on perinatal outcome. Trop Med Int Health. 2004; 9: 486-490.

20. Kohlgruber A, Lynch L. Adipose tissue inflammation in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes. Curr Diab Rep. 2015; 15: 92.

21. Vehapoglu A, Turkmen S, Goknar N, Ozer OF. Reduced antioxidant capacity and increased subclinical inflammation markers in prepubescent obese children and their relationship with nutritional markers and metabolic parameters. Comm Free Rad Res. 2016; 21: 271-280.

22. Khan A, Khan WM, Ayub M, Humayun M, Haroon M. Ferritin Is a Marker of Inflammation rather than Iron Deficiency in Overweight and Obese People. J Obes. 2016; 2016: 1937320.

23. Lao TT, Ho LF. Impact of iron deficiency anemia on prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2004; 27: 650-656.

24. Haap M, Machann J, von Friedeburg C, Schick F, Stefan N, Schwenzer NF, et al. Insulin sensitivity and liver fat: role of iron load. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011; 96: 958-961.

25. Merkel PA, Simonson DC, Amiel SA, Plewe G, Sherwin RS, Pearson HA, et al. Insulin resistance and hyperinsulinemia in patients with thalassemia major treated by hypertransfusion. N Eng J Med. 1998; 318: 809-814.

26. Wilson JG, Lindquist JH, Grambow SC, Crook ED, Maher JF. Potential role of increased iron stores in diabetes. Am J Med Sci. 2003; 325: 332- 339.

27. Chen X, Scholl TO, Stein TP. Association of elevated serum ferritin levels and the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus in pregnant women: The Camden study. Diabetes care. 2006; 29: 1077-1082.

28. Lao TT, Lee CP, Mak WP. Postpartum anaemia is not related to maternal iron status in the third trimester. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1996; 64: 7-10

29. Zhang Q, Ananth CV, Li Z, Smulian JC. Maternal anaemia and preterm birth: a prospective cohort study. Int J Epidemiol. 2009; 38: 1380- 1389.

30. Marti A, Pena-Marti G, Munoz S, Lanas F, Comunian G. Association between prematurity and maternal anemia in Venezuelan pregnant women during third trimester at labor. Arch Latinoam Nutr. 2001; 51: 44-48.

31. Drukker L, Hants Y, Farkash R, Ruchlemer R, Samueloff A, Grisaru-Granovsky S. Iron deficiency anemia at admission for labor and delivery is associated with an increased risk for Cesarean section and adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Transfusion. 2015; 55: 2799-2806.

32. Bhutta AT, Cleves MA, Casey PH, Cradock MM, Anand KJ. Cognitive and behavioral outcomes of school-aged children who were born preterm: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2002; 288: 728-737.

33. Rao R, Georgieff MK. Iron in fetal and neonatal nutrition. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2007; 12: 54-63.

34. Levy A, Fraser D, Katz M, Mazor M, Sheiner E. Maternal anemia during pregnancy is an independent risk factor for low birthweight and preterm delivery. European Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015; 122: 182-186.

35. Scholl TO, Hediger ML, Fischer RL, Shearer JW. Anemia vs iron deficiency: increased risk of preterm delivery in a prospective study. Am J Clin Nutr. 1992; 55: 985-988.

Chandra I, Sun L (2018) Serum Ferritin Assessment is Comparable With Hemoglobin to Predict Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes. Med J Obstet Gynecol 6(2): 1121.

Received : 02 Sep 2018
Accepted : 04 Oct 2018
Published : 06 Oct 2018
Journals
Annals of Otolaryngology and Rhinology
ISSN : 2379-948X
Launched : 2014
JSM Schizophrenia
Launched : 2016
Journal of Nausea
Launched : 2020
JSM Internal Medicine
Launched : 2016
JSM Hepatitis
Launched : 2016
JSM Oro Facial Surgeries
ISSN : 2578-3211
Launched : 2016
Journal of Human Nutrition and Food Science
ISSN : 2333-6706
Launched : 2013
JSM Regenerative Medicine and Bioengineering
ISSN : 2379-0490
Launched : 2013
JSM Spine
ISSN : 2578-3181
Launched : 2016
Archives of Palliative Care
ISSN : 2573-1165
Launched : 2016
JSM Nutritional Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3203
Launched : 2017
Annals of Neurodegenerative Disorders
ISSN : 2476-2032
Launched : 2016
Journal of Fever
ISSN : 2641-7782
Launched : 2017
JSM Bone Marrow Research
ISSN : 2578-3351
Launched : 2016
JSM Mathematics and Statistics
ISSN : 2578-3173
Launched : 2014
Journal of Autoimmunity and Research
ISSN : 2573-1173
Launched : 2014
JSM Arthritis
ISSN : 2475-9155
Launched : 2016
JSM Head and Neck Cancer-Cases and Reviews
ISSN : 2573-1610
Launched : 2016
JSM General Surgery Cases and Images
ISSN : 2573-1564
Launched : 2016
JSM Anatomy and Physiology
ISSN : 2573-1262
Launched : 2016
JSM Dental Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1548
Launched : 2016
Annals of Emergency Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1017
Launched : 2016
Annals of Mens Health and Wellness
ISSN : 2641-7707
Launched : 2017
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Health Care
ISSN : 2576-0084
Launched : 2018
Journal of Chronic Diseases and Management
ISSN : 2573-1300
Launched : 2016
Annals of Vaccines and Immunization
ISSN : 2378-9379
Launched : 2014
JSM Heart Surgery Cases and Images
ISSN : 2578-3157
Launched : 2016
Annals of Reproductive Medicine and Treatment
ISSN : 2573-1092
Launched : 2016
JSM Brain Science
ISSN : 2573-1289
Launched : 2016
JSM Biomarkers
ISSN : 2578-3815
Launched : 2014
JSM Biology
ISSN : 2475-9392
Launched : 2016
Archives of Stem Cell and Research
ISSN : 2578-3580
Launched : 2014
Annals of Clinical and Medical Microbiology
ISSN : 2578-3629
Launched : 2014
JSM Pediatric Surgery
ISSN : 2578-3149
Launched : 2017
Journal of Memory Disorder and Rehabilitation
ISSN : 2578-319X
Launched : 2016
JSM Tropical Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2578-3165
Launched : 2016
JSM Head and Face Medicine
ISSN : 2578-3793
Launched : 2016
JSM Cardiothoracic Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1297
Launched : 2016
JSM Bone and Joint Diseases
ISSN : 2578-3351
Launched : 2017
JSM Bioavailability and Bioequivalence
ISSN : 2641-7812
Launched : 2017
JSM Atherosclerosis
ISSN : 2573-1270
Launched : 2016
Journal of Genitourinary Disorders
ISSN : 2641-7790
Launched : 2017
Journal of Fractures and Sprains
ISSN : 2578-3831
Launched : 2016
Journal of Autism and Epilepsy
ISSN : 2641-7774
Launched : 2016
Annals of Marine Biology and Research
ISSN : 2573-105X
Launched : 2014
JSM Health Education & Primary Health Care
ISSN : 2578-3777
Launched : 2016
JSM Communication Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3807
Launched : 2016
Annals of Musculoskeletal Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3599
Launched : 2016
Annals of Virology and Research
ISSN : 2573-1122
Launched : 2014
JSM Renal Medicine
ISSN : 2573-1637
Launched : 2016
Journal of Muscle Health
ISSN : 2578-3823
Launched : 2016
JSM Genetics and Genomics
ISSN : 2334-1823
Launched : 2013
JSM Anxiety and Depression
ISSN : 2475-9139
Launched : 2016
Clinical Journal of Heart Diseases
ISSN : 2641-7766
Launched : 2016
Annals of Medicinal Chemistry and Research
ISSN : 2378-9336
Launched : 2014
JSM Pain and Management
ISSN : 2578-3378
Launched : 2016
JSM Women's Health
ISSN : 2578-3696
Launched : 2016
Clinical Research in HIV or AIDS
ISSN : 2374-0094
Launched : 2013
Journal of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Obesity
ISSN : 2333-6692
Launched : 2013
Journal of Substance Abuse and Alcoholism
ISSN : 2373-9363
Launched : 2013
JSM Neurosurgery and Spine
ISSN : 2373-9479
Launched : 2013
Journal of Liver and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2379-0830
Launched : 2014
Journal of Drug Design and Research
ISSN : 2379-089X
Launched : 2014
JSM Clinical Oncology and Research
ISSN : 2373-938X
Launched : 2013
JSM Bioinformatics, Genomics and Proteomics
ISSN : 2576-1102
Launched : 2014
JSM Chemistry
ISSN : 2334-1831
Launched : 2013
Journal of Trauma and Care
ISSN : 2573-1246
Launched : 2014
JSM Surgical Oncology and Research
ISSN : 2578-3688
Launched : 2016
Annals of Food Processing and Preservation
ISSN : 2573-1033
Launched : 2016
Journal of Radiology and Radiation Therapy
ISSN : 2333-7095
Launched : 2013
JSM Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
ISSN : 2578-3572
Launched : 2016
Annals of Clinical Pathology
ISSN : 2373-9282
Launched : 2013
Annals of Cardiovascular Diseases
ISSN : 2641-7731
Launched : 2016
Journal of Behavior
ISSN : 2576-0076
Launched : 2016
Annals of Clinical and Experimental Metabolism
ISSN : 2572-2492
Launched : 2016
Clinical Research in Infectious Diseases
ISSN : 2379-0636
Launched : 2013
JSM Microbiology
ISSN : 2333-6455
Launched : 2013
Journal of Urology and Research
ISSN : 2379-951X
Launched : 2014
Journal of Family Medicine and Community Health
ISSN : 2379-0547
Launched : 2013
Annals of Pregnancy and Care
ISSN : 2578-336X
Launched : 2017
JSM Cell and Developmental Biology
ISSN : 2379-061X
Launched : 2013
Annals of Aquaculture and Research
ISSN : 2379-0881
Launched : 2014
Clinical Research in Pulmonology
ISSN : 2333-6625
Launched : 2013
Journal of Immunology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2333-6714
Launched : 2013
Annals of Forensic Research and Analysis
ISSN : 2378-9476
Launched : 2014
JSM Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
ISSN : 2333-7109
Launched : 2013
Annals of Breast Cancer Research
ISSN : 2641-7685
Launched : 2016
Annals of Gerontology and Geriatric Research
ISSN : 2378-9409
Launched : 2014
Journal of Sleep Medicine and Disorders
ISSN : 2379-0822
Launched : 2014
JSM Burns and Trauma
ISSN : 2475-9406
Launched : 2016
Chemical Engineering and Process Techniques
ISSN : 2333-6633
Launched : 2013
Annals of Clinical Cytology and Pathology
ISSN : 2475-9430
Launched : 2014
JSM Allergy and Asthma
ISSN : 2573-1254
Launched : 2016
Journal of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
ISSN : 2334-2307
Launched : 2013
Annals of Sports Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2379-0571
Launched : 2014
JSM Sexual Medicine
ISSN : 2578-3718
Launched : 2016
Annals of Vascular Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2378-9344
Launched : 2014
JSM Biotechnology and Biomedical Engineering
ISSN : 2333-7117
Launched : 2013
Journal of Hematology and Transfusion
ISSN : 2333-6684
Launched : 2013
JSM Environmental Science and Ecology
ISSN : 2333-7141
Launched : 2013
Journal of Cardiology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2333-6676
Launched : 2013
JSM Nanotechnology and Nanomedicine
ISSN : 2334-1815
Launched : 2013
Journal of Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders
ISSN : 2475-9473
Launched : 2016
JSM Ophthalmology
ISSN : 2333-6447
Launched : 2013
Journal of Pharmacology and Clinical Toxicology
ISSN : 2333-7079
Launched : 2013
Annals of Psychiatry and Mental Health
ISSN : 2374-0124
Launched : 2013
Annals of Pediatrics and Child Health
ISSN : 2373-9312
Launched : 2013
JSM Clinical Pharmaceutics
ISSN : 2379-9498
Launched : 2014
JSM Foot and Ankle
ISSN : 2475-9112
Launched : 2016
JSM Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementia
ISSN : 2378-9565
Launched : 2014
Journal of Addiction Medicine and Therapy
ISSN : 2333-665X
Launched : 2013
Journal of Veterinary Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2378-931X
Launched : 2013
Annals of Public Health and Research
ISSN : 2378-9328
Launched : 2014
Annals of Orthopedics and Rheumatology
ISSN : 2373-9290
Launched : 2013
Journal of Clinical Nephrology and Research
ISSN : 2379-0652
Launched : 2014
Annals of Community Medicine and Practice
ISSN : 2475-9465
Launched : 2014
Annals of Biometrics and Biostatistics
ISSN : 2374-0116
Launched : 2013
JSM Clinical Case Reports
ISSN : 2373-9819
Launched : 2013
Journal of Cancer Biology and Research
ISSN : 2373-9436
Launched : 2013
Journal of Surgery and Transplantation Science
ISSN : 2379-0911
Launched : 2013
Journal of Dermatology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2373-9371
Launched : 2013
JSM Gastroenterology and Hepatology
ISSN : 2373-9487
Launched : 2013
Annals of Nursing and Practice
ISSN : 2379-9501
Launched : 2014
JSM Dentistry
ISSN : 2333-7133
Launched : 2013
Author Information X