Loading

Annals of Nursing and Practice

Severity of Stenosis and Obstructive Sleep Apnoearisk Factors, Symptoms in Patients Admitted to Coronary Angiography

Research Article | Open Access | Volume 5 | Issue 1

  • 1. Turkey Public Hospitals Authority, Turkey
  • 2. Department of Medical Nursing, Adnan Menderes University, Turkey
+ Show More - Show Less
Corresponding Authors
Zeynep Güne?, Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi, Hem?irelik Fakültesi, 09100 Ayd?n, Turkey
Absract

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is risk factor for coronary artery atherosclerosis. OSA and its risk factors evaluation isn’t carried out routinely with the patients hospitalized on suspicion of coronary artery disease. Thus, the aim of this study was to examine the prevalence and risk factors of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome and whether OSA risk factors and symptoms has any association with severity of stenosis. In a cross-sectional design, we collected data of 400 patients patients who underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. To determine the obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome risk, the STOP-BANG were administered. Excessive daytime sleepiness was defined by a score ≥10 on the Epworth Sleepiness Scale. Angiographic data obtained from coronary angiography’ results of hospitals. Ethical approval was obtained for the study. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 20.0. Results were evaluated at 95% confidence interval and at p<0.05 significance level. The neck circumference size was ≥43cm in 18.5% of men, ≥38 cm in 66% of women. The mean age of them was 60.45±1.40, the mean of body mass index was 28.08±4.7. Normal coronary angiograms were obtained for 101patients. Over and half of the participants had OSA risky. In parallel with OSA risky, it was determined that vessel lession risk increased. According to the logistic regression analysis, risk factors of vessel obstruction were age, neck circumference, cigarette, male gender, hypertension and obesity.

Conclusion: OSA risky is common in patients admitted to coronary angiography. There are association between OSA symptoms, presence of OSA risky and severity of stenosis.

Keywords

Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome; Risk factors; Coronary angiography

Citation

: Köz S, Güne? Z (2018) Severity of Stenosis and Obstructive Sleep Apnoearisk Factors, Symptoms in Patients Admitted to Coronary Angiography. Ann Nurs Pract 5(1): 1090

ABBREVIATIONS

OSA: Obstructive sleep apnea: CAD: Coronary artery disease BMI: Body mass index ESS: Epworth sleepiness scale

INTRODUCTION

Obstructive sleep apnea is characterized by intermittent hypoxia during sleep [1]. OSA is a medical condition affecting approximately 2-14% of the general population, but is often undiagnosed. It is potentially life threatening and can have serious consequences for a patient’s health [2-4]. Different studies have shown that OSA may be a risk factor for the incidence of some medical conditions such as cardiovascular diseases and stroke [1-4]. Studies indicate that coronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading cause of death among adults [4]. OSA is especially a major risk factor for cardiovascular diseases [1,4-12]. In a metaanalysis, Loke and colleagues (2012) find that OSA has been associated with cardiovascular morbidity. They reported an approximately 2.09 (95% CI, 1.20–3.65) times increased risk of cardiovascular mortality due to severe OSA. In a similar study, the authors investigated that the risk of cardiovascular diseases was increased 2.49 (95% CI, 1.98–3.10) times with OSA [14]. It was stated in the study of Yumino et al., (2007) that co-morbidities of OSA and acute coronary syndrome is 57%. Javadi et al., (2014) study showed that the number of stenotic vessels was significantly higher in patients with OSA. Patients with OSA had more severe stenosis and a higher number of vessels involved [15].

Cardiovascular complications induced by intermittent hypoxia in OSA. The relationships between OSA and CAD are explained with the increase in sympathetic activation, increase in the level of hyperleptinemia, angiotensin II and aldosterone, the increase in hypercoagulability. At the same time, possible mechanisms of vascular complications in OSA are explained with oxidative stress, inflammation and endothelial dysfunction [1,3,5,16,17].

Obstructive sleep apnea is associated with multiple major CAD risk factors as male gender, BMI >30kg/m2 , cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption, but OSA is also an independent risk factor for CAD. Other important risk factors for OSA include large neck circumference, family history and co morbidities such as hypertension, diabetes [2,3,16,18-22].

Despite their high prevalence, sleep disorders often remain unrecognized and untreated because of barriers to assessment and management [23]. Early recognition and treatment of OSA is important to prevent of cardiovascular complications, it has not yet been integrated into formal cardiovascular risk assessment algorithms. OSA evaluation isn’t carried out routinely in patients hospitalized due to suspected coronary artery disease [3,7,9,15,18]. Also, there is little information in literature about the frequency of OSA in patients undergoing coronary angiography, who have in patients with acute coronary syndrome [5,15].

Polysomnography accepted for the final diagnosis of OSA is seen as an expensive and time-consuming method. Therefore, it is impossible to proceed with polysomnography for all the patients undergoing coronary angiography. The STOP-Bang questionnaire is a validated screening tool for OSA [2,7,8,24]. It is applied in community-based and clinical samples worldwide. However, this study is one of the few studies carried out to determine the risk and symptoms of OSA in patients undergoing coronary angiography using the STOP-Bang questionnaire [8,24]. Yantis & Neatherlin (2005) reported that one of the first steps in identifying OSA is to recognize its signs and symptoms. Thesymptomsof OSA are snoring and excessive daytime sleepiness (ESS). A multidisciplinary approach is needed to evaluate the patients and other individuals in the society in terms of the risks of many diseases [11,26]. Nurses are an important member of the healthcare team. Nurses can help identify patients likely to be suffering from this disorder [26]. Malcom reported (2005) a nurse’s understanding of the condition, its diagnosis and treatment may help patients to manage it while in hospital.

Aim

The aim of this study was to examine the prevalence and risk factors of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome and whether OSA risk factors and symptoms has any association with severity of stenosis in patients admitted for percutaneous coronary intervention.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

According to the pre-study conducted with 20 people, GPower version 3.0.10 analysis was carried out and the number of the patients was determined as at least 153 for the sample size necessary for 80% power and at least α=0.05 significance level when a relationship between body mass index (BMI) and the number of involved vessels at the level of 0,20 was taken into consideration. Research sample was constituted by 400 patients (141 men and 259 women) admitted to the Hemodynamic Laboratory of the University Health Application and Research Center for coronary angiography between 01.03.2014 and 30.06.2014.

Criteria for inclusionin the study:

• Being admitted for coronary angiography

• Being 20 years old or more

• Not having a cardiac inflammation for at least 4 weeks and/or being in a stable period

• Having cognitive competence

• Being literate

• Being able to haveweight and height measured while standing.

• Voluntarily taking part of the study

Data collection tools

Patient Information Form included the socio-demographic characteristics of the patients, some OSA risk factors (neck circumference, history of sleep apnea in the family, body-mass index etc.), and angiographic results of the patients. Angiographic data obtained from coronary angiography’ results of hospitals. Angiographic results of the patients taking part in this study were evaluated by taking the opinions of the experts in 5 categories (Normal; Lesion without anycritical stenosis; Stenosis below 60%, Single-vessel lesion; Stenosis more than 60%; Two-vessel lesion; Three or more vessel lesion).

The symptoms and risky of OSA was evaluated using the epworth sleepiness scale and STOP Bang Questionnaire. Excessive daytime sleepiness is daytime symptoms of OSA. The ESS was used subjective measure of sleepiness. ESS is an eightitem questionnaire that is a simple and inexpensive instrument. The cut off point for excessive daytime sleepiness is considered to be equalor greater than 10 [11]. The STOP-Bang questionnaire consists of eight dichotomous (yes/no) items related to the clinical features of sleep apnea (Snoring, tiredness, observed apnea, high blood Pressure, BMI, age, neck circumference and male gender). STOP-Bang screening tests have a high sensitivity (>90%) to determine of OSA risky. The total score ranges from 0 to 8 [24].

Data collection

Research data was collected by the researcher through faceto-face interview method at Hemodynamic Clinicof the University Health Application and Research Center between March 2014 and June 2014.

Analysis

During the evaluation of data, SPSS 20 (Statistical Package for Social Sciences PASW Inc., Chicago. IL.USA) was used for statistical analysis. Help was received from a statistics expert. Results were evaluated at 95% confidence interval and at p<0.05 significance level.

Data about the descriptive characteristics of the patients (except for age), the clinic characteristics of the patients and about the angiographic results of the patients were given as number and percentage. Age, which was a continuous variable, was presented with mean and standard deviation. The difference between the state of daytime sleepiness of the patients according to their descriptive characteristics and OSA risk evaluation carried out through STOP Bang Questionnaire was evaluated with chi-square analysis. When the expected value was less than 5, one-sided significance value was taken into consideration. When two-sided significance value was asked, Fisher-Freeman-Halton test was taken into consideration. Change between angiography results according to OSA indicators was analyzed through the FisherFreeman-Halton test. The relationship between the angiographic results of OSA risk factors was tested through Logistic Regression Analysis. The patients were divided into two groups according to the angiography results for logistic regression analysis: “0”=no stenosis and “1” = any stenosis or lesion.

Ethical aspect of the study

A written permission was sought from the Uluda? University’s Faculty of Medicine Hospital, where the study was conducted, in order to conduct this study.The approval of the ethics committee was gotten from the Ethics Board of the Non-Pharmacological Clinical Researches, Faculty of Medicine (2014-7/11). Written consent was gotten from all the patients participating in this study.

RESULTS

Table 1 includes the descriptive characteristics of all the participants. Participants’ mean age was 60.45±11.40, almost all (93.5%) of the participants were married, nearly half (48.5%) of the participants had primary school education and nearly one fifth (18%) of the participants had university degree. When the participants are grouped in terms of their job status, it is seen that nearly half (41.8%) of the participants are not working, 28.2% of participants are housewives, 17.5% of the participants work in a sedentary job, and 12.5% of the participants work in a non-sedentary job.

Table 1: Distribution of the patients according to their descriptive characteristics.

Age (mean±s.deviation) 60.45±11.40
Gender n (%)  
Male 259(64.8%)
Female 141(35.2%)
Marital status (n%)  
Married 374(93.5%)
Single 26(6.5%)
Educational status (n%)  
Literate 25(6.3%)
Primary School 194(48.5%)
High School 109(27.2%)
Higher Education and above 72(18.1%)
Job status (n%)  
Not working 167(41.8%)
Housewife 113(28.2%)
Sedentary Job* 70(17.5%)
Non-Sedentary Job** 50(12.5%)
*civil servant, shopkeeper, driver and others
**worker, farmer

Table 2 includes information about angiography findings, symptoms of OSA and evaluation of risk for OSA according to the STOP Bang Questionnaire. According to the STOP Bang Questionnaire, 275 participants (68.8%) have a high risk of OSA, 111 participants (27.7%) have a low risk of OSA, and 14 participants (3.5%) have no risk of OSA. According to Epworth Sleepiness Scale, 348 participants (87%) don’t have a condition of daytime sleepiness and 52 participants (13%) have a condition of daytime sleepiness. According to the angiography results, 101 participants (25.2%) don’t have any stenosis in their coronary vessels, 117 participants (29.2%) have lesion in their coronary vessels but the stenosis in their vessels is not critical (below 60%), 97 participants (24.3%) have lesion in only one of their coronary vessels and the stenosis is more than 60%, 22 participants (5.5%) have lesion in two of their coronary vessels, and 63 participants (15.8%) have lesion in three or more of their coronary vessels

 Table 2: OSA risk and symptoms in patients admitted to coronary angiography. STOP-Bang questionnaire

STOP-Bang questionnaire n(%)
No Risk 14(3.5%)
Low Risk 111(27.7%)
High risk 275(68.8%)
Snoring  
Presence 302(75.5%)
Absent 90(22.5%)
Unknown 8(2%)
Excessive daytime sleepiness  
Presence (ESS score ≥10) 52(13%)
Absent 348(87%)
Witnessed apnea  
Presence 9(22.5%)
Absent 309(77.5%)
Angiography results n (%)
Normal 101(25.2%)
 Having lesion but no critical stenosis (stenosis 
below 60%) 
117(29.2%)
One vessel lesion. Stenosis more than 60% 97(24.3%)
Two vessels lesion 22(5.5%)
Three or more vessels lesion 63(15.8%)

Table 3 includes information about the distribution of sleep apnea risk factors in patients.

Table 3: Sleep apnea risk factors in patients

BMI (kg/m2) (mean±s.deviation) 28.08±4.74
BMI group n(%)
< 24,9kg/m2 106(26.5%)
25-29,9 200(50.0%)
> 30 94(23.5%)
Neck circumference, men (mean±s.deviation) 40.15± 3.5
Neck circumference, women (mean±s.deviation) 38.96 ± 3.16
Neck circumference,male n(%)
≥43cm 48(8.5%)
≤42cm 211(81.5%)
Neck circumference, female  
≥38cm 93(66.0%)
≤37cm 48(34.0%)
Amount of the alcohol consumed  
No alcohol consumption 46(6.5%)
≥2 glasses alcohol in a week 52(13.5%)
Smoking  
Never smoke 94(73.5%)
Ex-smoker 18(4.5%)
Active smoker 88(22.0%)
Family history  
Yes 20(5.0%)
No 380(95.0%)

The mean BMI of the patients was 28.08±4.74, 23.5% of the patients were obese and 50% of them were overweight (BMI 25 – 29.9). The mean neck circumference was 40.15± 3.5 cm for men. The neck circumference of 48 men (18.5%) was ≥43cm and neck circumference of 211 men (81.5%) was below ≤42 cm. The mean neck circumference was 38.96 ± 3.16 cm for women. When the participants were asked whether they drank alcohol or smoked, 346 participants (86.5%) stated that they didn’t drink alcohol, 294 participants (73.5%) stated that they didn’t smoke. Of these 400 patients, 44 patients stated that they drank 2 glasses of alcohol or less in a week. 88 (22%) of the participants stated that they were active smokers, and 18 (4.5%) of them stated that they were ex-smokers. 380 patients (95%) in this study stated that they didn’t have a history of sleep apnea in their family, and 20 patients (5%) stated that they had a history of sleep apnea in their family.

Older age, male gender high BMI and large NC was significantly associated with OSA risk level (Table 4). 

Table 4: Sleep apnea risk factors and OSA risk level according to STOPBang questionnaire

  No risk Low risk High risk P
Age[Medyan 
(min-maks)]* 
46 (23-769) 57(33-86) 63(30-87) <.001
Gender**
Female
Male
13 (%.2)
 1 (%0.4)
47 (% 
33.4)
 64 (%24.7)
81 (%57.4)
194 
(%74.9)
<.001
BMI**
< 24,9
25-29,9 
> 30
1 0 (%9,.4)
 53 (%1.9)
 1 (%0.8)
55 (%51.9)
44 (%27.2)
 12 (%9.81)
41 (%38.7)
115 (%71)
 119 
(%90.2)
<.001
Neck 
Circumference*
40.77±0.19 37.63±0.22 35.92±0.84 <.001
*KruskalWallis test, **Pearson chi-sguare

Regarding the comparison of the risk of OSA according to the STOP Bang with angiographic findings, significant association was observed (p=<.001) (Table 5).

Table 5: Relationship between OSA risk, symptoms and severity of stenosis(n,%)*.

STOP-Bang questionnaire
  No risk Low Risk High Risk P
Normal vessel 13(12.9%) 53(52.4%) 35(34.7%) <.000
Lesions with no critical stenosis 1(0.9%) 38(32.5%) 78(66.6%)
One vessel lesion 0(0.0%) 13(13.4%) 84(86.6%)
Two vessels lesion 0(0.0%) 0(0.0%) 22(100%)
Three or more vessels lesion 0(0.0%) 7(11.1%) 56(88.9%)
Snoring        
  Absent Presence Unknown <.000
Normal vessel 53(52.5%) 46(45.5%) 2(2.0%)
Lesions with no critical stenosis 3(2.6%) 90(76.9%) 3(2.6%)
One vessel lesion 7(7.2%) 89(91.8%) 1(1.1%)
Two vessels lesion 2(9.1%) 20(90.9%) 0(0.0%)
Three or more vessels lesion 4(6.3%) 57(90.5%) 2(1.2%)
Excessive daytime sleepiness n(%)
  Absent Presence  
Normal vessel 93(92.1%) 8(7.9%) <.000
Lesions with no critical stenosis 106(90.6%) 11(9.4%)
One vessel lesion 81(83.5%) 16(16.5%)
Two vessels lesion 17(77.3%) 5(22.7%)
Three or more vessels lesion 51(81.0%) 12(19.0%)
Witnessed apnea
  Absent Presence  
Normal vessel 3(3%) 98(97%) <.000
Lesions with no critical stenosis 16(13.7%) 101(86.3%)
One vessel lesion 36(37.1%) 61(62.9%
Two vessels lesion 6(27.3%) 16(72.2%)
Three or more vessels lesion 30(47.6%) 33(52.4%)
* Fisher-Freeman-Halton test was used in the comparisons. Column percent was used.


There was a parallel increase between OSA risk level and vessel lesion number. Vessel lesion rates were significantly higher in patients with high risk OSA than in those without. 88.9% of patients with three or more vessels lesion, 100% of patients with two vessel lesion, 86.6% of patients with one vessel lesion, 66.6% of patients with no critical stenosis has high risk for OSA.

A significant relationship was found between snoring, witnessed apnea and angiographic findings (p≤0.001). The snoring and witnessed apnea group had high vessel lesion ratios (p = 0.001; Table 5).

In the logistic regression analysis (Table 6),

Table 6: The relationship between OSA risk factors and coranary lesions according to Logistic regression analysis.

  B S.E Sig. OR 95% C.I.for EXP(B)
Low High
Age 0.066 0.014 0.000 1.068 1.040 1.097
Male 1.236 0.321 0.000 3.443 1.837 6.453
Neck Circumference 0.106 0.046 00.129.022 1.112 1.016 1.218
BMI < 24,9            
BMI 25-29,9 0.489 0.330 0.139 1.631 0.854 3.115
BMI > 30 0.792 0.404 0.050 2.207 1.000 4.868
Drinking Alcohol -0.246 0.482 0.611 0.782 0.304 2.013
Smoking     0.060      
Stopped Smoking 0.474 0.765 0.536 1.606 0.358 7.192
Actively Smokers 1.371 0.813 0.092 3.947 0.801 19.386
Family history (yes) 0.411 0.746 0.582 1.508 0.349 6.505
Hypertension (Yes) 1.106 0.306 0.000 3.023 1.660 5.505
B: Coefficient; SE:Standard Error ; OR:Odds Ratio CI:Confidence interval

the independent risk factors related to high risk for vessel lesion were age (1.068), neck circumference (1.112 times greater chance), hypertension (3.023 times greater chance of presenting high risk for vessel lesion) and male gender (3.443 times greater chance). Also, The presence of vein occlusion in those whose body mass index are between 25-29.9 increases 1.997 (95% CI 1.059-3.766) times compared to those whose BMI are ≤24.9, and it increases 3.071 (95% CI 1.431-6.593) times in those whose BMI are ≥ 30.

DISCUSSION

The World Health Organization reported that 31% of all global deaths was linked to cardiovascular diseases (28). OSA is risk factor for CAD [1,4,5,7-12]. OSA is frequently underdiagnosed and thus undertreated in CAD [2,4,6,7]. Hein, Loo and Lee (2012) stated OSA can trigger worse cardiovascular outcomes in patients and it is imperative identification of OSA in acute coronary syndrome patients. It is important before coronary angiography the determine of OSA risk as the syndrome has a deleterious effect on many of the organ systems especially the cardiorespiratory system [3,7,9,15,18]. Polysomnography is deemed the gold standard to diagnosing of OSA [13,29]. It is impossible to use in screening of all patients affected by cardiovascular disease of the polysomnogram test. STOP Bang questionnaire was a suitable screening tool for determine patients with unrecognized OSA [2,7,8,29]. Researchers reported the negative predictive value of the STOP-Bang model for OSA risky was high, especially in patients with moderate to severe OSA [2,7,8,24]. The STOP Bang Questionnaire has a high sensitivity in determining OSA risky for Turkish population [24]. OSA risk assessment has not yet been integrated into formal cardiovascular risk assessment algorithms. Also, in all patients undergoing coronary angiography didn’t perform routine screening for OSA risk. In our study, according to the STOP Bang Questionnaire, 68.8% of the patients have a high risk to OSA. It can be said that the participants in our study have a high risk for OSA.

The prediction of high OSA risk in our patients were supported by finding shows most patients in our study have snoring. Earlier studies suggested that snoring, witnessed apnea and excessive daytime sleepiness are an important clinical symptoms of OSA [2,30]. In our study, of the 400 patients, 302 (75.5%) had snoring. 13% of the patients have daytime sleepiness that is one of the major symptoms of OSA. Also, 22.5% of the patients has witnessed apnea. At the same time, a statistically significant difference was found in our study between the evaluation of OSA risk through the STOP Bang Questionnaire, snoring-obstruction and angiographic findings. We can say identification of OSA risk is especially important to prevent cardiovascular complications in these patients. We found patients had low excessive daytime sleepiness (ESS score ≥10) rates (13%). The reason for this result can be explained by OSA is not the only cause for excessive daytime sleepiness.In Study of Drager et al., (2010) reported 51% of Patients with OSA had no excessive daytime sleepiness. We can say the STOP Bang Questionnaire should perform in before coronary angiography for prevent of deleterious effect of OSA. Later, polysomnography can applied the patients if OSA risk was high.

OSA risk level of the patients determined through the STOP Bang Questionnaire and stenosis severity were compared in our study. OSA is thought to have increased the possibility of coronary lesion by inducing inflammation, oxidative stress and endothelium damage [5,9]. We found the risk of OSA among patients with the vessel lesion is extremely high. A minority of the patients having a high risk for OSA had normal vascular structure. Also, 47.6% of patients with witnessed apnea has three or more vessel lesion. In our study, 3% of vessels were normal conditions.

These results are compatible with the information in literature revealing that there has been a relationship between OSA and cardio vascular diseases. The relationship between OSA and coronary artery disease has been proven in several studies [1,5,9,13,14,19,32]. Javadi et al., (2014) in their study found a strong correlation between the number of stenotic vessels and OSA. Also, Javadi et al., (2014) determined in their study that there are 2 to 3 vessels stenosis among high-risk patients for OSA as classified by Berlin questionnaire. Liu et al., (2014) stated in their study that the severity or degree of stenosis in patients with OSA appeared to be higher than that of non-OSA patients. Also, in their study, The incidence of 3-vessel disease was higher in the OSA group. Unlike of our study, they reported the proportion of patients with double vessels disease was higher in non-OSA group. It should be noted that, in the of study, the prevalence of OSA is evaluated objectively using PSG, although, there are results that highlight the reliability of the subjective measurement obtained through the STOP bang [2,12,24]. In addition, their study included patients with ST-Elevation myocardial infarction [9], in our study, ppatients hadn’t cardiac exacerbations. Also, Acar et al., (2013) found the sensitivity of STOP Bang was 96.9% to detect sleep apnea (AHI ≥ 30). It is important to note that, it is essential for the healthcare team to be familiar with OSA risk for patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

There are mutual risk factors for cardiovascular diseases and sleep apnea syndrome. The important risk factors are age, gender, obesity, high blood pressure, smoking and alcohol consumption [1,8,21,31-35]. Also, neck circumference is risk factor both of them [28,33,35]. From logistic regression analysis, the variables age, gender (man), >30 BMI, NC and hypertension were found to be significant at 5 percent level of significance in our study. There was more observed vein occlusion if higher the odds ratio. It was observed high odds ratio for man gender (3.44, 95%CI, 1.04- 1.09), hypertension (3.02, 95%CI, 1.66-5.50), >30 BMI (2.20, 95%CI, 1.00-486), NC (1.11, 95%CI, 1.66-5.50), respectively

Age and obesity have similar mechanisms on vascular structures [36,37]. They are causing decrease in elasticity and an increase in stiffness of the arterial system. The changes in cardiovascular system are increased vessel occlusion [36]. Having high neck circumference was associated with obesity and CVD mortality [38]. Dai et al., (2016) reported that neck circumference is associated with development of cardiovascular disease in population study. Also, older age, higher NC and obesity are risk factors for sleep apnea syndrome [10,26,28,30,31- 34,37,38]. It was determined in our study that there is a significant relationship between the age, higher NC and BMI of participants and OSA risk level according to the STOP Bang Questionnaire.OSA has similar effects on endothelial function and arterial stiffness such as ageing, obesity [37].

There are several autonomic and hemodynamic changes in sleep apnea that may play a role in the pathogenesis of hypertension development. Increase of CO2 (Carbon dioxide) retention and decrease in oxygen saturation due to intermittent hypoxia can be a cause of changes in autonomic and hemodynamic response [1,3,31]. The possible mechanism between OSA and hypertension is explained with the increase in sympathetic activation, increase in the level of hyperleptinemia, angiotensin II and aldosterone, the increase in hypercoagulability, with oxidative and inflammatory stress, with endothelial dysfunction, and with baroreflex function due to intermittent hypoxia [1,17]. Changes in blood pressure occur as a result of increase in sympathetic activity and the secretion of vasoconstrictive substances such as endothelin. At the same time, oxidative stress and endothelial dysfunction caused by OSA play a role in vascular complications [1,3,5,17,37]. Eventually, hypertension increases the risk of the development of cardiovascular disease such as ischemic heart disease [39]. It was determined in our study that according to regression analysis results, the risk for vein occlusion in the patients with hypertension is 3.023 (95%CI 1.660-5.505) times more. It was determined in our study that the risk for vein occlusion in those whose BMI was between 25 and 29.9 increased 1.997 (95%CI 1.059-3.766) times compared to those whose BMI was ≤24.9, and it increased 3.071 (95%CI 1.431-6.593) times in those whose BMI was ≥30. It can be said that the risk of developing cardiovascular disease is higher in elderly and obese individuals with OSA risk. We can say that elderly, hypertensive, obese individuals should be routinely screened for OSA. This approach, which will provide the identification of OSA, will be important in preventing the effects of OSA on the cardiovascular system and will enable more effective approaches to cardiovascular diseases.

Male gender is cardiovascular diseases and OSA risk factors [33,34]. Some studies reported that there are a number of pathophysiological differences to suggest why men are more prone to OSA and cardiovascular disease than women. Why Male gender is cardiovascular risk factors, it is explained by differences in body fat distribution, plasma lipoprotein levels and hormonal [18,21,34]. The male predisposition for OSA has been attributed to some factors including differences in breathing control, hormones and aging [18, 21]. Heinzer et al., (2015]. It was found in our study that there is a significant relationship between gender and OSA risk level determined by the STOP Bang Questionnaire, hence, 57.4% of the women and 74.9% of the men had high risk of OSA. Our findings support the view that male gender is a risk factor for OSA. It is also seen in a logistic regression analysis that male gender is a factor increasing OSA risk and vein occlusion.

Difficulties and limitations of the study

Our study has limitations that deserve attention. As the number of the patients was high, economic cost was high and time was limited, polysomnography, accepted as the gold standard in determining OSA, couldn’t be performed. Thus, we could not determine the actual effect OSA on the development and severity of cardio-vascular diseases.The STOP Bang Questionnaire is a screening test for the high risk of OSA and should not replace a full OSA investigation [8,20,24]. In conclusion, STOP Bang test could be used to predict the presence of OSA risk in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

This study was a cross-sectional retrospective. Thus, generalisation of findings to another people, to populations with a high prevalence of cardio-vascular diseases, or to patients admitted for percutaneous coronary intervention is limited.

CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS

According to the STOP Bang Questionnaire, more than half of the patients undergoing percutaneous intervention having a high risk for OSA, the possibility of having vessel lesion in the coronary arteries of the patients with high risk for OSA being quite high. There are relationship important between older age, male gender, obesity, larger NC, hypertension and OSA risk level according to the STOP Bang Questionnaire. The relationship between OSA symptoms and vein occlusion are dramatic results of our study.

REFERENCES

1. Fava C, Montagnana, M, Favaloro J, Guidi GC,Lippi G. Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome and cardiovascular diseases. Sem?nars In Thrombos?s And Hemostas?s. 2011; 37: 280-297.

2. Sheldon A, Belan I, Neill J, Rowland S. Nursing assessment of obstructive sleep apnea in hospitalised adults: a review of risk factors and screening tools. Contemporary Nurse. 2010; 34: 19-33.

3. Floras JS. Sleep apnea and cardiovascular risk. Journal of Cardiology. 2014; 63: 3–8.

4. Rivas M, Ratra A, Nugent K. Obstructive sleep apnea and its effects on cardiovascular diseases: a narrative review. Anatol J Cardiol. 2015; 15: 944-50.

5. Yumino D, Tsurumi Y, Takagi A, Suzuki K, Kasanuki H. Impact of obstructive sleep apnea on clinical and angiographic outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndrome. The American Journal of Cardiology. 2007; 99: 26–30.

6. Hein T, Loo G, Lee CH. Obstructive sleep apnea, coronary artery disease and continuous positive airway pressure therapy. Interv. Cardiol. 2012; 4: 595–606.

7. Massierer D, Martinez D, Costa Fuchs S, Pellin PP, Garcia MS, Zacharias AL, et al. Obstructive sleep apnea, detected by the Berlin Questionnaire: an associated risk factor for coronary artery disease. Cad. Saúde Pública, Rio de Janeiro. 2012; 28: 1530-1538.

8. Javadi HR, Jalilolghadr S, Yazdi Z,Rezaie Majd Z. Correlation between obstructive sleep apnea syndrome and cardiac disease severity. Cardiovascular Psychiatry and Neurology. 2014; Article ID 631380, 5 pages.

9. Liu B, Guo R, Zhou S, XieSh, Wang K, Xu Y. Effects of obstructive sleep apnea on cardiac function and clinical outcomes in Chinese patients with ST-elevation myocardial ?nfarction. The Scientific World Journal. 2014.

10. Andrechuk CRS, Ceolim MF. High risk for obstructive sleep apnea in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem. 2015; 23: 797-805.

11. Andrechuk CRS, Ceolim MF. Sleep quality and adverse outcomes for patients with acute myocardial infarction. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2015; 25: 223–230.

12. Wali SO, Alsharif MA, Albanji MH, Baabbad MS, Almotary HM, Alama N, et al. Prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea among patients with coronary artery disease in Saudi Arabia. J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2015; 27: 227–233.

13. Loke YK, Brown JWL, Kwok CS, Niruban A. Association of obstructive sleep apnea with risk of serious cardiovascular events, a systematic review and meta-analysis. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes. 2012; 5: 720-728.

14. Dong JY, Zhang YH, Qin LQ. Obstructive sleep apnea and cardiovascular risk: meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies, Atherosclerosis. 2013; 229: 489-495.

15. Sharma S, Gebregziabher M, Parker AT, Abro JA, Armstrong AM, Schoepf J. Independent association between obstructive sleep apnea and noncalcified coronary plaque demonstrated by noninvasive coronary computed tomography angiography. Clin. Cardiol. 2012; 35: 641–645.

16. Redline S, Yenokyan G, Gottlieb DJ, Shahar E, O’Connor GT, Resnick HE, et al. Obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea and incident stroke: the sleep heart health study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010; 182: 269- 277.

17. Pinto P, Bárbara C, Montserrat JM, Patarrão RS, Guarino MP, Carmo MM, et al. Effects of CPAP on nitrate and norepinephrine levels in severe and mild-moderate sleep apnea. BMC Pulmonary Medicine. 2013; 13.

18. Lin CM,Davidson TM, Ancoli-Israel S. Gender differences in obstructive sleep apnea and treatment implications. Sleep Medicine Reviews. 2008; 12: 481-496.

19. Torres-Alba FD, Gemma D, Armada-Romero E, Rey-Blas JR, López-deSá E, López-Sendon JL. Obstructive sleep apnea and coronary artery disease: from pathophysiology to clinical implications. Pulmonary Medicine. 2013; 2013.

20. Shear TC, Balachandran JS, Mokhlesi B, Spampinato LM, Knutson KL, Meltzer DO, et al. Risk of sleep apnea in hospitalized older patients. J Clin Sleep Med. 2014; 10: 1061-1066.

21. Heinzer R, Vat S, Marques-Vidal P, Marti-Soler H, Andries D, Tobback N, et al. Prevalence of sleep-disordered breathing in the general population: the Hypno Laus study. Lancet Respir Med. 2015; 3: 310- 318.

22. Deng X, Gu W, Li Y, Liu M, Li Y, Gao X. Age-group-specific associations between the severity of obstructive sleep apnea and relevant risk factors in male and female patients. PloS ONE. 2014; 9: e107380.

23. Michal M, Wiltink J, Kirschner Y, Wiltink J, Schneider A, Wild P, et al. complaints of sleep disturbances are associated with cardiovascular disease: results from the Gutenberg Health Study. Plos One. 2014; 9: e104324.

24. Acar VH, Kaya A, Yücel F, Erdem M, Günal SE, Özgen F et al. Validation of the STOP-Bang Questionnaire: an Obstructive Sleep Apnoea Screening Tool in Turkish Population (Obstrüktif uyku apnesi tarama testi olarak kullan?lan stopbang testinin Türk popülasyonunda geçerlili?inin saptanmas?). Turkish J Anaesthesiol Reanimation. 2013; 41: 115-20.

25. Yantis MA, Neatherlin J. Obstructive sleep apnea in neurological patients. J Neurosci Nursing. 2005; 37: 150-155.

26. Merritt SL, Berger BE. Obstructive sleep apnea–hypopnea syndrome. Am J Nursing. 2004; g104: 49-52.

27. Malcolm A. The nurse role in managing and treating sleep disorders. Nursing Times. 2005; 101: 34.

28. World Heart Day 2017. Scale up prevention of heart attack and stroke. 2017.

29. Chung F, Yegneswaran B, Liao P, Chung SA, Vairavanathan S, Islam S, et al. Validation of the Berlin questionnaire and American Society of Anesthesiologists checklist as screening tools for obstructive sleep apnea in surgical patients. Anesthesiol. 2008; 108: 822-830.

30. Rowley JA, Fahy BF, Sockrider M. https://www.thoracic.org/patients/ patient-resources/resources/obstructive-sleep-apnea-in-adults.pdf. ATS Patient Education Series © 2017 American Thoracic Society.

31. Drager LF, Genta PR, Pedrosa RP, Nerbass FB, Gonzaga CC, Krieger EM, et al. Characteristics and predictors of obstructive sleep apnea in patients with systemic hypertension. Am J Cardiol. 2010; 105: 1135- 1139.

32. Lee W, Nagubadi S, Kryger MH, Mokhlesi B. Epidemiology of obstructive sleep apnea: a population-based perspective. Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine. 2008; 12: 349-364.

33. Peppard PE, Young T, Barnet JH, Palta M, Hagen EW, Hla KM. Increased prevalence of sleep-disordered breathing in adults. Am J Epidemiol, 2013; 177: 1006-1014.

34. Mohsenin V. Gender differences in the expression of sleep-disordered breathing : role of upper airway dimensions. Chest. 2001; 120: 1442- 1447.

35. Sogebi OA, Ogunwale A. Risk factors of obstructive sleep apnea among Nigerian outpatients. Brazilian J Otorhinolaryngol. 2012;78: 27-33.

36. Cheitlin MD. Cardiovascular physiology-changes with aging. Am J Geriatr Cardiol. 2003;12: 9-13.

37. Yim-Yeh S, Rahangdale S, Nguyen ATD, Jordan AS, Novack V, Veves A, et al. Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Aging Effects on Macrovascular and Microcirculatory Function. Sleep. 2010; 33: 1177-1183.

38. Dai Y, Wan X, Li X, Jin E, Li X. Neck circumference and future cardiovascular events in a high-risk population—A prospective cohort study. Lipids Health Dis. 2016;15:46.

39. Špinar J. Hypertension and ischemic heart disease. Cor et Vasa. 2012; 54: e433-e438.

Köz S, Güne? Z (2018) Severity of Stenosis and Obstructive Sleep Apnoearisk Factors, Symptoms in Patients Admitted to Coronary Angiography. Ann Nurs Pract 5(1): 1090.

Received : 10 Oct 2017
Accepted : 31 Jan 2018
Published : 02 Feb 2018
Journals
Annals of Otolaryngology and Rhinology
ISSN : 2379-948X
Launched : 2014
JSM Schizophrenia
Launched : 2016
Journal of Nausea
Launched : 2020
JSM Internal Medicine
Launched : 2016
JSM Hepatitis
Launched : 2016
JSM Oro Facial Surgeries
ISSN : 2578-3211
Launched : 2016
Journal of Human Nutrition and Food Science
ISSN : 2333-6706
Launched : 2013
JSM Regenerative Medicine and Bioengineering
ISSN : 2379-0490
Launched : 2013
JSM Spine
ISSN : 2578-3181
Launched : 2016
Archives of Palliative Care
ISSN : 2573-1165
Launched : 2016
JSM Nutritional Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3203
Launched : 2017
Annals of Neurodegenerative Disorders
ISSN : 2476-2032
Launched : 2016
Journal of Fever
ISSN : 2641-7782
Launched : 2017
JSM Bone Marrow Research
ISSN : 2578-3351
Launched : 2016
JSM Mathematics and Statistics
ISSN : 2578-3173
Launched : 2014
Journal of Autoimmunity and Research
ISSN : 2573-1173
Launched : 2014
JSM Arthritis
ISSN : 2475-9155
Launched : 2016
JSM Head and Neck Cancer-Cases and Reviews
ISSN : 2573-1610
Launched : 2016
JSM General Surgery Cases and Images
ISSN : 2573-1564
Launched : 2016
JSM Anatomy and Physiology
ISSN : 2573-1262
Launched : 2016
JSM Dental Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1548
Launched : 2016
Annals of Emergency Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1017
Launched : 2016
Annals of Mens Health and Wellness
ISSN : 2641-7707
Launched : 2017
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Health Care
ISSN : 2576-0084
Launched : 2018
Journal of Chronic Diseases and Management
ISSN : 2573-1300
Launched : 2016
Annals of Vaccines and Immunization
ISSN : 2378-9379
Launched : 2014
JSM Heart Surgery Cases and Images
ISSN : 2578-3157
Launched : 2016
Annals of Reproductive Medicine and Treatment
ISSN : 2573-1092
Launched : 2016
JSM Brain Science
ISSN : 2573-1289
Launched : 2016
JSM Biomarkers
ISSN : 2578-3815
Launched : 2014
JSM Biology
ISSN : 2475-9392
Launched : 2016
Archives of Stem Cell and Research
ISSN : 2578-3580
Launched : 2014
Annals of Clinical and Medical Microbiology
ISSN : 2578-3629
Launched : 2014
JSM Pediatric Surgery
ISSN : 2578-3149
Launched : 2017
Journal of Memory Disorder and Rehabilitation
ISSN : 2578-319X
Launched : 2016
JSM Tropical Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2578-3165
Launched : 2016
JSM Head and Face Medicine
ISSN : 2578-3793
Launched : 2016
JSM Cardiothoracic Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1297
Launched : 2016
JSM Bone and Joint Diseases
ISSN : 2578-3351
Launched : 2017
JSM Bioavailability and Bioequivalence
ISSN : 2641-7812
Launched : 2017
JSM Atherosclerosis
ISSN : 2573-1270
Launched : 2016
Journal of Genitourinary Disorders
ISSN : 2641-7790
Launched : 2017
Journal of Fractures and Sprains
ISSN : 2578-3831
Launched : 2016
Journal of Autism and Epilepsy
ISSN : 2641-7774
Launched : 2016
Annals of Marine Biology and Research
ISSN : 2573-105X
Launched : 2014
JSM Health Education & Primary Health Care
ISSN : 2578-3777
Launched : 2016
JSM Communication Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3807
Launched : 2016
Annals of Musculoskeletal Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3599
Launched : 2016
Annals of Virology and Research
ISSN : 2573-1122
Launched : 2014
JSM Renal Medicine
ISSN : 2573-1637
Launched : 2016
Journal of Muscle Health
ISSN : 2578-3823
Launched : 2016
JSM Genetics and Genomics
ISSN : 2334-1823
Launched : 2013
JSM Anxiety and Depression
ISSN : 2475-9139
Launched : 2016
Clinical Journal of Heart Diseases
ISSN : 2641-7766
Launched : 2016
Annals of Medicinal Chemistry and Research
ISSN : 2378-9336
Launched : 2014
JSM Pain and Management
ISSN : 2578-3378
Launched : 2016
JSM Women's Health
ISSN : 2578-3696
Launched : 2016
Clinical Research in HIV or AIDS
ISSN : 2374-0094
Launched : 2013
Journal of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Obesity
ISSN : 2333-6692
Launched : 2013
Journal of Substance Abuse and Alcoholism
ISSN : 2373-9363
Launched : 2013
JSM Neurosurgery and Spine
ISSN : 2373-9479
Launched : 2013
Journal of Liver and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2379-0830
Launched : 2014
Journal of Drug Design and Research
ISSN : 2379-089X
Launched : 2014
JSM Clinical Oncology and Research
ISSN : 2373-938X
Launched : 2013
JSM Bioinformatics, Genomics and Proteomics
ISSN : 2576-1102
Launched : 2014
JSM Chemistry
ISSN : 2334-1831
Launched : 2013
Journal of Trauma and Care
ISSN : 2573-1246
Launched : 2014
JSM Surgical Oncology and Research
ISSN : 2578-3688
Launched : 2016
Annals of Food Processing and Preservation
ISSN : 2573-1033
Launched : 2016
Journal of Radiology and Radiation Therapy
ISSN : 2333-7095
Launched : 2013
JSM Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
ISSN : 2578-3572
Launched : 2016
Annals of Clinical Pathology
ISSN : 2373-9282
Launched : 2013
Annals of Cardiovascular Diseases
ISSN : 2641-7731
Launched : 2016
Journal of Behavior
ISSN : 2576-0076
Launched : 2016
Annals of Clinical and Experimental Metabolism
ISSN : 2572-2492
Launched : 2016
Clinical Research in Infectious Diseases
ISSN : 2379-0636
Launched : 2013
JSM Microbiology
ISSN : 2333-6455
Launched : 2013
Journal of Urology and Research
ISSN : 2379-951X
Launched : 2014
Journal of Family Medicine and Community Health
ISSN : 2379-0547
Launched : 2013
Annals of Pregnancy and Care
ISSN : 2578-336X
Launched : 2017
JSM Cell and Developmental Biology
ISSN : 2379-061X
Launched : 2013
Annals of Aquaculture and Research
ISSN : 2379-0881
Launched : 2014
Clinical Research in Pulmonology
ISSN : 2333-6625
Launched : 2013
Journal of Immunology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2333-6714
Launched : 2013
Annals of Forensic Research and Analysis
ISSN : 2378-9476
Launched : 2014
JSM Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
ISSN : 2333-7109
Launched : 2013
Annals of Breast Cancer Research
ISSN : 2641-7685
Launched : 2016
Annals of Gerontology and Geriatric Research
ISSN : 2378-9409
Launched : 2014
Journal of Sleep Medicine and Disorders
ISSN : 2379-0822
Launched : 2014
JSM Burns and Trauma
ISSN : 2475-9406
Launched : 2016
Chemical Engineering and Process Techniques
ISSN : 2333-6633
Launched : 2013
Annals of Clinical Cytology and Pathology
ISSN : 2475-9430
Launched : 2014
JSM Allergy and Asthma
ISSN : 2573-1254
Launched : 2016
Journal of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
ISSN : 2334-2307
Launched : 2013
Annals of Sports Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2379-0571
Launched : 2014
JSM Sexual Medicine
ISSN : 2578-3718
Launched : 2016
Annals of Vascular Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2378-9344
Launched : 2014
JSM Biotechnology and Biomedical Engineering
ISSN : 2333-7117
Launched : 2013
Journal of Hematology and Transfusion
ISSN : 2333-6684
Launched : 2013
JSM Environmental Science and Ecology
ISSN : 2333-7141
Launched : 2013
Journal of Cardiology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2333-6676
Launched : 2013
JSM Nanotechnology and Nanomedicine
ISSN : 2334-1815
Launched : 2013
Journal of Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders
ISSN : 2475-9473
Launched : 2016
JSM Ophthalmology
ISSN : 2333-6447
Launched : 2013
Journal of Pharmacology and Clinical Toxicology
ISSN : 2333-7079
Launched : 2013
Annals of Psychiatry and Mental Health
ISSN : 2374-0124
Launched : 2013
Medical Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
ISSN : 2333-6439
Launched : 2013
Annals of Pediatrics and Child Health
ISSN : 2373-9312
Launched : 2013
JSM Clinical Pharmaceutics
ISSN : 2379-9498
Launched : 2014
JSM Foot and Ankle
ISSN : 2475-9112
Launched : 2016
JSM Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementia
ISSN : 2378-9565
Launched : 2014
Journal of Addiction Medicine and Therapy
ISSN : 2333-665X
Launched : 2013
Journal of Veterinary Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2378-931X
Launched : 2013
Annals of Public Health and Research
ISSN : 2378-9328
Launched : 2014
Annals of Orthopedics and Rheumatology
ISSN : 2373-9290
Launched : 2013
Journal of Clinical Nephrology and Research
ISSN : 2379-0652
Launched : 2014
Annals of Community Medicine and Practice
ISSN : 2475-9465
Launched : 2014
Annals of Biometrics and Biostatistics
ISSN : 2374-0116
Launched : 2013
JSM Clinical Case Reports
ISSN : 2373-9819
Launched : 2013
Journal of Cancer Biology and Research
ISSN : 2373-9436
Launched : 2013
Journal of Surgery and Transplantation Science
ISSN : 2379-0911
Launched : 2013
Journal of Dermatology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2373-9371
Launched : 2013
JSM Gastroenterology and Hepatology
ISSN : 2373-9487
Launched : 2013
JSM Dentistry
ISSN : 2333-7133
Launched : 2013
Author Information X