Incidence, Risk Factors and Outcome of Perinatal Asphyxia at a Tertiary Referral Center in Sierra Leone: A Case-Control Study
- 1. Consultant Paediatrician, Ola During Children Hospital, University of Sierra Leone Teaching Hospital Complex, Sierra Leone
- 2. Specialist Obstetrician and Gynaecologist, Princess Christian Maternal Hospital, University of Sierra Leone Teaching Hospital Complex, Sierra Leone
Abstract
Background: Perinatal asphyxia is a leading cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality and it is responsible for about a third of neonatal deaths in Sierra Leone. Identifying and addressing the various risk factors associated with perinatal asphyxia could reduce this burden. This study was therefore done to determine the incidence, risk factors and outcome of perinatal asphyxia among neonates delivered at the Princess Christian Maternity Hospital, University of Sierra Leone Teaching Hospital Complex, Freetown, Sierra Leone.
Methods: This is a case control study, conducted from 1st May 2024 to 30th June 2024. Neonates diagnosed with perinatal asphyxia (Apgar score < 7 at 5th minute) were considered as “cases” (N = 110) while neonates born either with normal vaginal delivery or by cesarean section having no abnormality were considered as “control” (N = 110).
Results: The incidence rate of perinatal asphyxia was 7.60%. Young maternal age <18 years (p = 0.031), lower maternal educational status (p = 0.040), primigravidity (p = 0.028), primiparity (p = 0.007), abnormal amniotic fluid (p = <0.001), labour duration ≥ 12 hours (p = <0.001) and prolonged rupture of membranes ≥ 24 hours (p = 0.028), were related to the occurrence of perinatal asphyxia. Out of the 110 asphyxiated neonates, 7 died giving a case fatality of 3.4%.
Conclusion: Various risk factors led to the high incidence of perinatal asphyxia in this study. Improving the quality of antenatal care; labour monitoring; and strengthening capacity of healthcare workers on neonatal resuscitation, are crucial in reducing morbidity and mortality associated with perinatal asphyxia.
Keywords
• Incidence
• Risk factors
• Outcome
• Perinatal asphyxia
Citation
Akhigbe IE, Luke RDC, Bell NVT, Sesay A, Sovula HS (2025) Incidence, Risk Factors and Outcome of Perinatal Asphyxia at a Tertiary Refer ral Center in Sierra Leone: A Case-Control Study. Pediatr Child Health 13(3): 1358.
INTRODUCTION
The first month of life is the most fragile stage of child survival, with 2.3 million newborn deaths recorded globally in 2022 [1]. Sub-Saharan Africa bears the highest burden, with a neonatal mortality rate of 27 neonatal deaths per 1000 live births [1]. Approximately 75% of these deaths occur during the first week of life, and about 1 million newborns die within the first 24 hours predominantly due to premature births, birth complications, neonatal infections and congenital anomalies [1-3].In Sierra Leone, the newborn mortality rate is 31 deaths per 1,000 live births, which represent a quarter of under-five deaths [4]. Prematurity-related complications, intrapartum-events (including perinatal asphyxia) and neonatal infections accounts for 80% of these deaths, most of which are preventable with timely and effective interventions [5].Perinatal asphyxia alone, contributes to approximately one-third of neonatal deaths in Sierra Leone [5].The occurrence of asphyxia can be linked to antepartum, peripartum, and fetal risk factors [6]. In resource limited settings, reducing its burden requires optimizing the management of these risk factors while ensuring preparedness for neonatal resuscitation at delivery [7].Despite the significant impact of perinatal asphyxia, limited data exists on its associated risk factors in Sierra Leone. This study therefore aimed to evaluate the incidence, associated risk factors, and outcomes of perinatal asphyxia in a tertiary referral facility within Sierra Leone.
METHODOLOGY
Study location
The University of Sierra Leone teaching hospital complex consists of six hospitals which includes the Princess Christian Maternity Hospital (PCMH) and the Ola During Children Hospital (ODCH), in the capital city of Freetown, Sierra Leone. Both facilities are located within the same premises with PCMH serving as the tertiary referral hospital for Obstetrics and Gynaecology; and ODCH is the tertiary referral hospital for Paediatric care. Annually, over 8,000 deliveries occur in PCMH, and babies requiring in-hospital care are transferred to the neonatal unit of ODCH. This study was conducted at the delivery and neonatal units of PCMH and ODCH respectively.
Study design
This study was a prospective case control study, conducted from 1st May 2024 to 30th June 2024, using a non-probability sampling method.
Recruitment of study subject
The cases were newborns delivered at term and diagnosed of having perinatal asphyxia. Perinatal asphyxia was defined as babies who were unable to establish breathing at birth with one of the following criteria: Apgar score < 7 at the 5th minute and/or; the notion of resuscitation having lasted at least 10 minutes and/or; the presence of signs of early encephalopathy [8,9]. The controls represented newborns delivered directly after the birth of the cases and showed no signs of asphyxia. For each case included, one control was recruited. When two cases are consecutive, we took as controls the two newborns following these two with an Apgar score greater than 7. All newborns with Apgar < 7 but with a clinically detectable congenital defect and neonates born at home/ others facilities were excluded.
Data collection
A pre-tested survey form was used for data collection. Data on the condition of the newborn were collected from the birth examination. The socio-demographic factors of the mothers were noted and questions regarding possible risk factors were asked directly. Some parameters were obtained from obstetric and antenatal clinic (ANC) records. The parameters studied were frequency, socio demographic characteristics (maternal age, education level, marital status), antepartum factors (gravidity, parity, ANC visits, use of long-lasting insecticidal nets, presence of fever in the third trimester of pregnancy, presence of chronic illnesses in the mother), intrapartum parameters (reason for admission, presentation of the fetus, appearance of the amniotic fluid, duration of labour), fetal factors (sex of the newborn, birth weight) and prognosis (Sarnat score, duration of resuscitation, outcomes of perinatal asphyxia). Sarnat’s classification [10], into minor (I), moderate (II) and severe (III) neonatal encephalopathy are the most widely used. The data was collected by four trained resident doctors under the supervision of a senior paediatric resident on a daily basis. The investigators made a daily follow-up of the neonates in the neonatal unit to determine their admission outcomes.
Data analysis
Data was entered into the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25.0 for IBM electronic spreadsheet. Frequencies and percentages were calculated for categorical data. Risk factors for perinatal asphyxia were grouped into antepartum, intrapartum, and fetal variables. Odds ratio (OR) and confidence interval at 95% were used to evaluate the degree of association between these variables and the risk of asphyxia. Multivariate analysis with logistic regression was carried out, to look for independent association. The level of significance was set at p <0.05 in all the statistical analyses.
Ethical considerations
Permission for the study was obtained from the management and the research committee of the hospitals. Written informed consent (by signature or thumbprint) was obtained from those who volunteered.
RESULTS
The incidence rate of perinatal asphyxia among term babies was 7.60% (110/1448) during the period of this study.
Antepartum Risk Factors
The mean age of mothers was 24.90 ± 5.10 years for cases and 27.39 ± 4.21 years for controls. Maternal age less than 18 years (p = 0.031; OR = 2.634; 95% CI [1.042 – 2.661]), low educational status (p = 0.040; OR = 2.080; 95% CI [1.798 – 3.461]) primigravidity (p = 0.028; OR = 2.167; 95% CI [1.613 – 2.997]), and primiparity (p = 0.007; OR = 3.086; 95% CI [2.219 – 3.571]), were risk factors for the occurrence of antepartum perinatal asphyxia (Table 1).
Table 1: Distribution of maternal socio-demographic characteristics and antepartum risk factors for Perinatal asphyxia.
|
Variables |
Case(N=110) |
Control(N=110) |
OR |
CI 95% |
p-value |
|
n (%) |
n (%) |
||||
|
Age (years) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
< 18 |
8 (7.28) |
2 (1.83) |
2.634 |
1.042-2.661 |
0.031 |
|
18-29 |
73 (66.36) |
72 (65.45) |
|
|
|
|
30-39 |
29 (26.36) |
36 (32.72) |
|
|
|
|
Educational status |
|
|
|
|
|
|
No formal education |
18 (16.36) |
16 (14.55) |
2.080 |
1.798-3.461 |
0.040 |
|
Primary |
31 (28.18) |
19 (17.27) |
|
|
|
|
Secondary |
55 (50.00) |
58 (52.73) |
|
|
|
|
Tertiary |
6 (5.46) |
17 (15.45) |
|
|
|
|
Gravidity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
<2 |
49 (44.55) |
41 (37.27) |
2.167 |
1.613-2.997 |
0.028 |
|
2-4 |
57 (51.82) |
54 (49.09) |
|
|
|
|
≥5 |
4 (3.63) |
15 (13.64) |
|
|
|
|
Marital status |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Single |
49 (44.55) |
38 (34.55) |
1.522 |
0.884-2.622 |
0.084 |
|
Married |
61 (55.45) |
72 (65.45) |
|
|
|
|
Parity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
<2 |
68 (61.82) |
45 (40.91) |
3.086 |
2.219-3.571 |
0.007 |
|
≥2 |
42 (38.18) |
65 (59.09) |
|
|
|
|
No. of ANC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
<4 |
37 (33.64) |
26 (23.64) |
1.638 |
0.906- 2.9959 |
0.101 |
|
≥4 |
73 (66.36) |
84 (76.36) |
|
|
|
|
ANC facility |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private |
0 (0.00) |
3 (2.73) |
0.748 |
0.415-1.350 |
0.164 |
|
Public tertiary/ secondary |
75 (68.18) |
78 (70.91) |
|
|
|
|
Public primary |
35 (31.82) |
29 (26.36) |
|
|
|
|
IPT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes |
100 (90.91) |
92 (83.64) |
1.957 |
0.859-4.457 |
0.106 |
|
No |
10 (9.09) |
18 (16.36) |
|
|
|
|
LLIN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes |
32 (29.09) |
36 (32.73) |
0.843 |
0.476-1.495 |
0.560 |
|
No |
78 (70.91) |
74 (67.27) |
|
|
|
|
Fever in 3rd trimester |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes |
29 (26.36) |
20 (18.18) |
1.611 |
0.846-3.067 |
0.145 |
|
No |
81 (73.64) |
90 (81.82) |
|
|
|
|
Maternal chronic illness |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes |
5 (4.55) |
9 (8.18) |
0.534 |
0.173-1.649 |
0.269 |
|
No |
105 (95.45) |
101 (91.82) |
|
|
|
Percentages add downward. Abbreviations: ANC: antenatal care; LLIN: Long-lasting insecticidal mosquito nets; IPT: intermittent preventive treatment for malaria
Intrapartum Risk Factors
Risk factors associated with the occurrence of intrapartum perinatal asphyxia were prolonged rupture of membranes ≥ 24 hours (p=0.028; OR = 2.494; CI 95% [1.080 – 5.756]), abnormal amniotic fluid (p= <0.001; OR = 9.905; CI 95% [4.560 – 12.514]), labour duration ≥ 12 hours (p=<0.001; OR = 3.343; CI 95% [2.182 – 5.123]) (Table 2).
Table 2: Intrapartum risk factors for Perinatal asphyxia
|
Variables |
Case(N=110) |
Control(N=110) |
OR |
CI 95% |
p-value |
|
n (%) |
n (%) |
||||
|
Referred mother |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes |
54 (49.09) |
45 (40.91) |
0.718 |
0.421-1.224 |
0.223 |
|
No |
56 (50.91) |
65 (59.09) |
|
|
|
|
Type of presentation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cephalic |
101 (91.82) |
106 (96.36) |
0.423 |
0.126-1.419 |
0.153 |
|
Breech |
9 (8.18) |
4 (3.64) |
|
|
|
|
PROM (hours) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
<24 |
90 (81.82) |
101 (91.82) |
2.494 |
1.080-5.756 |
0.028 |
|
≥24 |
20 (18.18) |
9 (8.18) |
|
|
|
|
Amniotic fluid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Normal |
36 (30.91) |
104 (95.55) |
9.905 |
4.560- 12.514 |
<0.001 |
|
Abnormal |
76 (69.09) |
6 (4.45) |
|
|
|
|
Labour duration(hour) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
<12 |
41 (37.27) |
92 (83.64) |
3.343 |
2.182-5.123 |
<0.001 |
|
≥12 |
69 (62.73) |
18 (16.36) |
|
|
|
|
Mode of delivery |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spontaneous vaginal |
59 (53.64) |
67 (60.91) |
1.227 |
0.735-2.048 |
0.502 |
|
Caesarean |
49 (44.56) |
42 (38.18) |
|
|
|
|
Assisted delivery |
2 (1.80) |
1 (0.91) |
|
|
|
Percentages add downward. Abbreviations: PROM: Prolonged rupture of membranes
Fetal Risk Factors
Birth weight (p=0.385; OR = 1.617; CI 95% [0.807 -3.242]) and gender (p=0.412; OR = 0.799; CI 95% [0.467 -1.367]) were not significantly associated with the risk for perinatal asphyxia (Table 3).
Table 3: Fetal risk factors for Perinatal asphyxia.
|
Variables |
Case(N=110) |
Control(N=110) |
OR |
CI 95% |
p-value |
|
n (%) |
n (%) |
||||
|
Gender |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Male |
61 (55.45) |
67 (60.91) |
0.799 |
0.467-1.367 |
0.412 |
|
Female |
49 (44.55) |
43 (39.09) |
|
|
|
|
Birth weight (grams) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
<2500 |
18 (16.36) |
12 (10.91) |
1.617 |
0.807-3.242 |
0.385 |
|
2500-3999 |
90 (81.82) |
93 (84.55) |
|
|
|
|
≥4000 |
2 (1.82) |
4 (4.54) |
|
|
|
Percentages add downward.
In multivariate analysis, maternal level of education (p = 0.048; OR = 1.110; 95% CI [0.432 – 2.855]),primigravidity (p = 0.008; OR = 3.896; 95% CI [1.161 –13.073]), primiparity (p = 0.002; OR = 3.804; 95% CI [1.646– 11.698]), abnormal amniotic fluid (p < 0.001; OR = 4.044; 95% CI [3.017 – 6.114]), long labour duration (p = 0.012;OR = 1.353; 95% CI [1.159 - 5.788]), were statistically associated with perinatal asphyxia (Table 4).
Table 4: Multivariate analysis of risk factors for Perinatal asphyxia
|
Variables |
OR |
CI 95% |
p-value |
|
Maternal age |
0.908 |
0.454-1.815 |
0.358 |
|
Educational status |
1.110 |
0.432-2.855 |
0.048 |
|
Parity |
3.804 |
1.646-11.698 |
0.002 |
|
Gravidity |
3.896 |
1.161-13.073 |
0.008 |
|
PROM |
1.585 |
0.520-4.828 |
0.421 |
|
Labour duration |
1.353 |
1.159-5.788 |
0.012 |
|
Amniotic fluid |
4.044 |
3.017-6.114 |
<0.001 |
PROM: Prolonged rupture of membranes
Outcomes of Perinatal asphyxia
Out of the 110 cases of perinatal asphyxia, 103 (96.6%) were discharged, while 7 (3.4%) died. The apgar score was≤3 at the 5th minute for all babies that died. Amongst the asphyxiated neonates in this study, 42 (38.18%) developed HIE with 13 (30.95%) having mild HIE, 17 (40.48%) had moderate HIE, and 12 (28.57%) had severe HIE (Table 5). Eighty-eight (80%) of the asphyxiated neonates stayed less than 7 days in the hospital, 18 (16.4%) between 7 and10 days, and 4 (3.6%) more than 10 days.
DISCUSSION
The incidence of perinatal asphyxia varies within the West African sub-region. We report an incidence of 7.60% which is comparable to the 8.00% from a study in Cameroon [11], but higher than 4.50%, 4.85% and 5.1% reported from Benin [12], Niger [13], and Chad [14], respectively. Authors from Nigeria [15], (12.60%) and Burkina Faso [16], (19.80%) have recorded even higher incidence of perinatal asphyxia. Differences across studies may reflect varying methodologies and diagnostic criteria employed. Conversely, in high income countries [17,18], where advanced scientific approaches are used in identifying cases of perinatal asphyxia, a significantly low incidence of less than 1% was reported, implying the possibility of overestimating the number of perinatal asphyxia cases in resource-limited settings.Young maternal age (<18years), lower educational status, primigravidity and primiparity were significant antepartum risk factors, as corroborated by previous studies [14,19-22]. The combination of a low weight before pregnancy, inadequate prenatal care, ignorance of early danger signs, and cephalo-pelvic disproportion which could make deliveries more difficult and prolongedcould explain our findings [14,19-22]. Although the level of ANC facility and number of ANC visits could ensure prevention, early detection and treatment of obstetric complications, and preparation for delivery [2,3,23], these factors were not significantly associated with the occurrence of perinatal asphyxia in our study. This finding underscores the importance of up scaling the quality of pregnancy monitoring and having qualified personnel and adequate equipment in peripheral health facilities to deal with emergency obstetric and neonatal care.Similar to other studies [7,8,12,24], intrapartum complications-particularly prolonged labour, prolonged rupture of membranes, and abnormal amniotic fluid emerged as strong predictors for perinatal asphyxia, highlighting the importance of timely obstetric intervention. The most common complications of prolonged rupture of membrane are amnionitis and endometritis, which increases the risk of infection in-utero leading to hypoxia and thus perinatal asphyxia [25]. Additionally, therapeutic interventions for prolong labour can cause excessive contractions and reduce placenta blood supply resulting in fetal hypoxia, increased intestinal peristalsis and relaxation of the anal sphincter with emission of meconium into the amniotic fluid [17,26,27].Similar to other studies [7,8,12,24], intrapartum complications-particularly prolonged labour, prolonged rupture of membranes, and abnormal amniotic fluid emerged as strong predictors for perinatal asphyxia, highlighting the importance of timely obstetric intervention. The most common complications of prolonged rupture of membrane are amnionitis and endometritis, which increases the risk of infection in-utero leading to hypoxia and thus perinatal asphyxia [25]. Additionally, therapeutic interventions for prolong labour can cause excessive contractions and reduce placenta blood supply resulting in fetal hypoxia, increased intestinal peristalsis and relaxation of the anal sphincter with emission of meconium into the amniotic fluid [17,26,27].
CONCLUSION
There is a high incidence of perinatal asphyxia similar to findings within sub-Saharan Africa. Young maternal age, primigravidity, prolong rupture of membranes and prolong labour were among the identified risk factors. Improving the quality of antenatal care; labour monitoring; and strengthening capacity of healthcare workers on neonatal resuscitation are crucial in reducing morbidity and mortality associated with perinatal asphyxia.
LIMITATIONS
This study was conducted in a referral facility that manages high-risk deliveries, limiting generalizability of study findings. Additionally, reliance on Apgar scores for diagnosis may overestimate the number of cases, as biochemical confirmation (scalp and cord pH, base deficiency and lactate levels) was unavailable. Further studies in primary and secondary health facilities, including long-term outcomes of asphyxiated neonates, are recommended.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors acknowledge our research assistants for the invaluable support provided during data collection. We are also grateful to the hospital’s management.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
All authors made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the study, acquisition of data, or data analysis and interpretation, took part in drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content, gave final approval of the version to be published, and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
REFERENCES
- Newborn Mortality. General Facts- WHO 2024.
- World Health Organization (WHO). Newborns: Reducing Mortality. 2019.
- World Health Organization. 7000 Newborns Die Every Day Despite Steady Decrease in under Five Mortality New Report Says. World Health Organization, Geneva. 2017.
- Statistics Sierra Leone (Stats SL) and ICF. Sierra Leone Demographic and Health Survey 2019. Freetown, Sierra Leone, and Rockville, Maryland, USA: 2020 Stats SL and ICF.
- Levels and Trends in Child Mortality Report. Estimates developed by the UN Inter-Agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation (UN IGME), UNICEF. 2018.
- Majeed R, Memon Y, Majeed F, Shaikh NP, Rajar UD. Risk Factors of Birth Asphyxia. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2007; 19: 67-71.
- Ndiaye O, Tidane Cisse C, Diouf S, Cisse Bathily A, Diallo D, Lamine Fall
- Agbeko F, Ketevi AA, Fiawoo M, Tata BBL, Abalo KE, et al. Risk Factors for Birth Asphyxia in Togo: A Case-Control Study. Open J Pediatr. 2021; 11: 816-831.
- WHO (World Health Organization) Guidelines for Clinical Practices ofObstetrical and Neonatal Emergency Care in Africa: Guide for Health Provider. 3rd Edition, World Health Organization, Brazzaville (2018).
- Sarnat HB, Sarnat MS. Neonatal Encephalopathy Following Fetal Distress. A Clinical and Electroencephalographic Study. Arch Neurol. 1976; 33: 696-705.
- Chiabi A, Nguefack S, Mah E, Nodem S, Mbuagbaw L, Mbond E, et al. Risk Factors for Birth Asphyxia in an Urban Health Facility in Cameroon. Iran J Child Neurol. 2013; 7: 46-54.
- D’Almeida M, Lalya F, Bagnan L, Djidita Hagre Y, Adedemy JD, Ayivi
-
B. Asphyxie perinatale du nouveau-ne a terme: Facteurs de risque et prognostic au Centre National Hospitalier et Universitaire (CNHU- HKM) de Cotonou. J africain de pediatrie et de genetique medicale. 2017; 1: 10-15.Kamaye M, Alido S, Ayouba ZM, Aboubacar S, Tidjani H, AmadouFacteurs de risque et profil evolutif a court terme de l’asphyxie perinatale a la maternite Issaka Gazobi de Niamey (NIGER). J de la Recherche Scientifique de l’Universite de Lome. 2019; 21: 295-303.
- Gabkika BM, Souam NS, Adrienne N, Yannick A. Birth Asphyxia in Full term Neonates in N’djamena Mother and Child Hospital (Chad). J Med Res. 2018; 4: 151-153.
- Ige OO, Adah RO, Ekere IA, Toma BO. Risk Factors and Mortality of Severely Asphyxiated Neonates in a Tertiary Center in North-Central Nigeria. Jos J Med. 2011; 7: 10-14.
- Ouedraogo Yugbare SO, Coulibaly G, Koueta F, Yao S, Savadogo H, Dao L, et al. Profil a risque et pronostic neonatal de l’asphyxie perinatale en milieu hospitalier pediatrique a Ouagadougou. J de Pediatrie et de Puericulture. 2015; 28: 64-70.
- Bouiller JP, Dreyfus M, Mortamet G, Guillois B, Benoist G. Asphyxie perpartum a terme: Facteurs de risque de survenue et consequences a court terme. J de Gynecologie Obstetrique et Biologie de la Reproduction. 2016; 45: 626-623.
- Padayachee N, Ballot DE. Outcomes of Neonates with Perinatal Asphyxia at a Tertiary Academic Hospital in Johannesburg, South Africa. South African J Child Health. 2013; 7: 89-94.
- Lee AC, Mullany LC, Tielsch JM, Katz J, Khatry SK, LeClerq SC, et al. Risk Factors for Neonatal Mortality Due to Birth Asphyxia in Southern Nepal: A prospective, Community-Based Cohort Study. Pediatr. 2008; 121: 1381-1390.
- Nayeri F, Shariat M, Dalili H, Adam LB, Mehrjerdi FZ, Shakeri A. Perinatal Risk Factors for Neonatal Asphyxia in Vali-e-Asr Hospital, Tehran-Iran. Iranian J Reproductive Med. 2012; 10: 137-140.
- Onyearugha CN, Ugboma HA. Fetal Outcome of Antepartum and Intrapartum Eclampsia in Aba, Southeastern Nigeria. Trop Doct. 2012; 42: 129-132.
- Levene MI, De-vries LS. The Central Nervous System. In: Martin, R.C., Fanaroff AA. and Walsh MC., Eds., Neonatal -Perinatal Medicine, 9th Edition, Saunders Co., United States, 2015; 952-971.
- United Nations Inter-Agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation (UN IGME) Levels & Trends in Child Mortality: Report 2019. Estimates Developed by the United Nations Inter-Agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation. United Nations Children’s Fund, New York. 2019.
- Ugwu GIM, Abedi HO, Ugwu EN. Incidence of Birth Asphyxia as Seen in Central Hospital and GN Children’s Clinic both in Warri Niger Delta of Nigeria: An Eight Year Retrospective Review. Glob J Health Sci. 2012; 4: 140-146.
- Kardana IM. Risk factors of perinatal asphyxia in the term newborn at sanglah general hospital. Bali Med J. 2016; 5: 175-178.
- Langer B. Reperage de l’asphyxie au cours du travail. Revue de medicine perinatale. 2013; 5: 73-80.
- Vijai ABB, Shyamal, a DS, Kishore KB. Birth asphyxia: incidence and immediate outcome in relation to risk factors and complications. Int J Res Heal Sci. 2014; 2: 1064-1071.
- Johnston MV, Hagberg H. Sex and Pathogenesis of Cerebral Palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007; 49: 74-78.
- Douba EC. Souffrance cérébrale asphyxique du nouveauné à terme au Centre Mère-Enfant de Yaoundé, Faculté de Médecine et de Sciences Biomédicales, Université de Yaoundé. 2007.
- Ilah BG, Aminu MS, Musa A, Adelakun MB, Adeniji AO, KolawoleT. Prevalence and Risk Factors for Perinatal Asphyxia as Seen at a Specialist Hospital in Gusau, Nigeria. Sub-Saharan Afr J Med. 2015; 2: 64-69.
- Casey BM, McIntire DD, Leveno KJ. The continuing value of the Apgar score for the assessment of newborn infants. N Engl J Med. 2001; 344: 467-471.
- Monebenimp F, Tietche F, Eteki N. Asphyxie néonatale au centre hospitalier universitaire de Yaoundé. Clin Mother Child Health. 2005; 2: 335-338.
- Kaye D. Antenatal and intrapartum risk factors for birth asphyxia among emergency obstetric referrals in Mulago Hospital, Kampala, Uganda. East Afr Med J. 2003; 80: 140-143.
- Debillon T, Cantagrel S, Zupan-Simunek V, Gressens P. Neuroprotection par hypothermie lors des encephalopathies anoxoischemiques du nouveau-ne a terme: Etat des connaissances. Archives de Pediatrie. 2008; 15: 157-161.