Clinical Research in Infectious Diseases

Clinical Use of Chinese Medicine in the Current COVID-19 Crisis and Related Research Planning

Review Article | Open Access | Volume 5 | Issue 1

  • 1. Institute of Chinese Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
  • 2. State Key Laboratory of Research on Bioactivities and Clinical Applications of Medicinal Plants, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
  • 3. Department of Chemical Pathology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
+ Show More - Show Less
Corresponding Authors
Ping-Chung Leung, Institute of Chinese Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 5/F School of Public health Building, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong, Tel: 85-222528868; Fax: 85-226325441.

During the current COVID-19 pandemic, since the crisis started in China, extensive reports regularly came out from China National Health Authorities and individual epidemiological and viral experts of different origins, giving the up-date data of the spread and treatment regularly. Reports concerning the use of Traditional Chinese Medicine were plenty. Collection and analysis of the rich data provide good understanding how Tradition Chinese Medicine was utilized in the combat against the COVID-19 infection. Early reports obviously emphasized the treatment aspects. Later reports had more information on the preventive side since the overall clinical presentation of COVID-19 involved many mild cases, treatment of which, using herbal medicine, should resemble situations of prevention before the actual contraction of the infection.
Later, the National Bureau of Traditional Chinese Medicine and the Committee on Public Health and Hygiene gave proper recommendations on the prevention side and advocated the joint utilization of one common herbal formula.
Apart from critically looking at the clinical value of the selected common herbal formula, the basic mechanisms leading to prevention: how is personal protection achieved need to be explored. Could it be related to the boosting of the innate immunological system? This could be the direction of current research planning.
The plan of research involves a systematic investigation on how the innate immunological system respond to the herbal treatment. The research procedures under planning concentrate on the in-vitro and in-vivo investigations in laboratory platforms on the responses to herbal treatment. A small pilot study will further strengthen the evidences when 30-40 healthy volunteers will get their blood checked before and after consumption of the innovative formula.
The herbal formula recommended by the Chinese Authorities will not be used as the target of investigation since it contains 21 herbs one of which (Asarum) is well known for renal toxicity. Instead, an innovative formula of simpler composition that has won good clinical trust in the SARS crisis of Hong Kong in 2003 will be the subject of study, to be investigated together with Vitamin D as a coupling supplement for infection prevention of the respiratory tract.


• Chinese Medicine; COVID-19; Crisis


Ping-Chung L, Chung-Lap Ben C, Chun-Kwok W (2020) Clinical Use of Chinese Medicine in the Current COVID-19 Crisis and Related Research Planning. Clin Res Infect Dis 5(1): 1054.


Seventeen years ago, right after the SARS epidemic in Hong Kong and China. We prepared a manuscript entitled “The Efficacy of Chinese Medicine for SARS: A Review of Publications after the Crisis [1].” Today within the present COVID-19 pandemic, we would continue our work through objective observations on how Chinese Medicine is being used in China to counteract the COVID-19 crisis, thence get prepared to start a timely research project planning.

During the SARS crisis in China, 40-60% infected patients, at some stages of their treatment, received Chinese medicine on top of the standard modern medicine treatment. This practice was endorsed and encouraged by the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, and some details of the herbal treatment were provided. A review of the publications during and after the SARS crisis enabled us to get an objective view of the true value of the adjuvant therapy using Chinese medicinal herbs. Of the 130 articles searched, 90 were of reasonable quality and contained sufficient information for the enlightenment of the situation. The review revealed positive but inconclusive indications about the efficacy of the combined treatments using Chinese medicine as an adjuvant. Positive effects using adjuvant herbal therapy included better control of fever, quicker clearance of chest infection, lesser consumption of steroids and other symptom relieves. In a few reports, some evidences of immunological boosterings were also found [1].

One important publication after the SARS crisis summarized the total drug expenditure in the Beijing Xiao Tang Shan Hospital, which was built as an emergency set-up to accommodate over 680 SARS patients. The statistics given by the dispensary indicated that the majority of drugs used fell into the modern medicine categories, whereas only a small proportion was of Chinese medicine nature. The varieties of the latter included items for the control of symptoms like cough, high fever and diarrhea, i.e. for supplementary uses [2].

An outbreak of pneumonia caused by Novel Coronavirus (CoVID-19) in Wuhan, Hubei province in China, started in December 2019, and spread to other countries worldwide. This outbreak brought back memories of the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in China and Hong Kong in 2003, caused by a SARS-CoV2-coronavirus [3-5]. SARS-CoV-2 rapidly spread from southern China in 2003 and infected more than 3000 people, killing 774 by 2004.

The COVID-19 virus bears similarities with SARS CoV in molecular structures, but the infectivity and clinical presentations of the infected have been quite different. The incubation period is more variable, and the respiratory symptomatology is somewhat unpredictable [6]. The outbreak in Wuhan and subsequent spread in China have already shown the scale of involvement is much much larger than the SARS epidemic and the 80,000 more infected have demonstrated a hundred times more difficulties in the clinical managements. A joint international inspection on the COVID-19 epidemic in China was organized by the WHO in February 2020. Following that, a joint report gives detailed data: the responsible virus, the outbreak, the infectivity, clinical pictures and the managements [7].

One unique feature given in the report is that infected people could be categorized as Very Serve (5%), Severe (10-15%), Moderate and Mild (80%). In China where Traditional Medicine is so popular with standard infrastructures like Traditional Chinese Medicine hospitals and clinics, those infected and present with moderate to mild symptoms would naturally seek remedy from Chinese Medicine. In addition, those undiagnosed or worrying about infection, would also look for Chinese Medicine rescue. Such vast areas of epidemic infection in China has created excellent venues for research related to the use of Traditional Chinese Medicine [8].


[From the very early stage of the epidemic in January 2020, different Chinese Medicine Universities and Institutes in different provinces started to give open advice to the public on the use of classical herbal formulae for COVID-19 sufferers. In general, 20-30 classical herbal formulae were recommended as anti-viral agents under different clinical situations personally felt by the user. As usual, Traditional Chinese Medicine experts would insist on herbal consumption only after expert’s diagnosis and recommendation. The high-level recommendations indeed, have made serious precautionary warnings that “consulting the experts is mandatory” and “refrain from personal use [9]”. Brief press releases on results of treatment for those diagnosed and hospitalized are also appearing. How the use of the ancient formulae correlate with the use of modern hospital treatment are unclear.

So, reports on the use of Chinese Medicine in this early part of the COVID epidemic appear quite similar to the SARS crisis in 2003. Searching through the WHO Joint Report of February 2020, one realizes that Traditional Chinese Medicine is mentioned in three areas, all related to treatment. One would have wished that the role of Chinese Medicine as a preventive agent could be included.

Living through the present Pandemic, we are getting up-date information from the internet day by day. Solitary reports could be conveniently synthesized to give more information towards the later stages of the epidemic in China.

Thus it has been reported that all over China 630 hospitals serving COVID-19 patients have been using Traditional Chinese Medicine inclusively with other treatment. Nearly 600 top Chinese Medicine experts over the country have been involved in the planning and treatment. 10 classical formulae are most frequently used and the choice has followed the need for easing pulmonary problem (heat and dampness). In the mild cases Chinese Medicine treatment overwhelms (only 10% patients use modern pharmaceuticals together.) In the more severe cases being treated in the hospitals, around 5% are also using Chinese Medicine. The overall observation is that over 90% of all recorded treatment programs have involved Traditional Chinese Medicine [10].

Academician Zhang Bo-li carefully analysed the results of different herbal formulae used for treatment of COVID-19 patients and concluded that one effective formula could be constituted from the present experiences and he is preparing a proper drug trial protocol to get proper endorsement from the China FDA (China Press April 2020).

On the other hand, the highly reputed Academician Dr. Zhong Nan Shan advocated the use of one popular herbal proprietary product “Lianhua Qingwen capsule” as a good treatment option for very mild symptoms as well as for the prevention of getting infected. The capsule has been popular in China, well known as an anti-influenza proprietary drug and has undergone many clinical trials for influenza patients. One meta-analysis of the reports indicated that: when compared with the anti-virus drug oseltamivir, it showed superiority in the relief of fever, headache, throat discomfort and cough [11].

The extensive geographic involvement of the COVID-19 epidemic, the large number of infected people with mild symptoms, and the clinical evidences of herbal medicine’s efficacy in viral respiratory infections in the last decades, are all driving forces behind an enthusiastic interest and commitment on the research on Traditional Chinese Medicine, not only for treatment but also for prevention.

In March 2020, a group of Traditional Chinese Medicine experts from Hunan collected all available information from across China and analysed the different treatment programs under varying clinical circumstances (i.e. From very mild, mild, moderate, sever to very severe).

This report, however, fails to give confirmation about the real treatment value for severe cases. It has chosen to put some emphasis on the mild cases and prevention of deterioration [12].

Some details of this report will be given in the following paragraphs.

Concerning Treatment: the choice of herbal application followed the general staging of the disease and the complications after hospital admissions, to be advised by Chinese Medicine experts. Since different provinces and cities have their own groups of experts, the herbal formulae advocated were widely divergent although “Lung Toxicity” remained the common target. Descriptions on treatment details and results are obviously simple and brief.

Concerning Prevention: the report emphasized a lot after giving a leading commentary, stating that historically the classical formulae stressed a lot about the value of prevention: advocating an intelligent intake of medication well ahead of the expected epidemic [12].

14 herbs were listed as the common choices in different formulae and varying circumstances of prevention. Moreover, other classical formulae and their minor modifications were presented from different provinces and cities. Sophisticated considerations were recommended for fine tunnings of the formulae basing on different symptoms and judgments of “Balanced Health”; “Heat Tendency”, “Cold Tendency”; “Flail Tendency” etc. Special groups of people like children, elderlies, pregnant women and chronically ill were also addressed.

The Hunan Review is a perfect collection of facts related to the use of Traditional Chinese Medicine within the COVID-19 epidemic, for treatment and particularly for prevention. Modern biological and pharmacological evidences are not the main concern.

In February 2020, the National Bureau of Traditional Chinese Medicine and the Committee on Public Health and Hygiene made a general recommendation that during the COVID-19 crisis one carefully selected herbal formula deserved to be used as a priority choice for the patients. The formula is compiled from four very well known classical formulae used extensively for influenza-like symptoms affecting the respiratory tract. The formula consists of 21 herbs and is advocated to be used under all circumstances and at all stages of the disease [9,13,14].

This directive must have been well-taken and followed. If there is a joint effort using this one formula in large number of treatment centres, the clinical results would be of great values.

Indeed among many clinical applications, one report just came out from Sichuan which has completed one clinical trial on a group of 98 admitted patients with proven COVID-19 infection screened and diagnosed strictly according to National Criteria [15-17]. The patients were admitted into 4 hospitals. There was no significant gender discrepancy and the age ranged from 40 to 70. The severities of pneumonic symptoms were classified as: Mild 55.1%, Moderate 33.7%, and Severe 11.2%.

The Clinical assessments: mainly fever, cough and weakness, were taken every 3 days. During the treatment period using the priority formula there were clear observations of progressive improvement. All patients survived and adverse effects had been minor. Laboratory investigations included standard liver and renal function tests, basic blood pictures and some inflammation related data like C reactive protein. There was no specific exploration on any change in the immunological defense system before and after taking the medicine.

The following conclusions were made: the overall clinical improvements in the first 3 days reached 84.2% (21% of which totally recovered and 30% improved greatly). In the following 3 days, 31% totally recovered and 30% improved a lot. At the end of 9 day’s treatment, all recovered.

In this report, no reference was given whether the herbal medicine was given as the sole treatment agent or whether other pharmaceuticals were given together. Since only 11 cases belonged to the severe group, the value of the herbal medicine could possibly be related to the prevention of deterioration through a boosting up the natural defense of the diseased.

As the authors admitted: the trial involved only a small number of patients and understandably, there was no time to take into account other concomitant measures; yet the quick recovery of the mild group should have well supported the preventive use of the herbal medicine.

Inspite of the convincing reports of good results, when the 21 herbal combination is studied carefully one discovers that there is one herb of great controversy: Asarum. The problem herb contains aristolochic acid, which is renal toxic and carcinogenic, hence not suitable for long term consumption [18-20]. Although there are many classical writings supporting its special and careful uses [20], in the present era, medicine containing Asarum should not qualify as a safe preventive agent.


Now that good experience has been gathered from two coronal virus epidemics (SARS and COVID-19), and the creation of specific vaccine, is to be waited, we need to consider some other possibility of building up one’s self-defense against infections. Traditional Chinese Medicine in the current combat against COVID-19 has gained so much attention and has made great contributions, particularly for the mild cases. Additional efforts could be put on the development of a simple, safe herbal formula that would boost up the immunological defense system against viral infection. The formula should not raise toxicity concerns and should have sufficient historical support, feasible for quality assurance and immunological platform studies.

At the peak of the SARS epidemic in Hong Kong, hospital workers were under high risks of the infection. During the SARS outbreak, herbal preparations had been used jointly with standard modern treatment in China. As a means to protect the atrisk hospital workers, an innovative herbal formula was created and consumed by 3160 of them for two weeks. During the two weeks, symptoms and adverse effects were close monitored. 37 of them had their serum checked for immunological responses.

The results showed that none of the herb consumers contracted the infection, compared to 0.4% among the nonconsumers. Adverse effects had been infrequent and mild. There were hardly any influenza-like symptoms and the quality of life improved. In the group who volunteered to have their immunological state checked, significant boosting effects were found [21-23].

A total of 37 laboratory technicians completed the blood tests. There were no derangements in total white cells and lymphocytes, but the CD4/CD8 (helper/suppressor), ratio of T-lymphocytes increased significantly from 13.1 ± 0.5 on days 0 to 14.1 ± 0.6 on day 15 (p = 0.015), and returned to the initial level on day 29. The B-lymphocyte count (cell/μl), however, decreased from 282 ± 142 on day 0 to 263 ± 99 on day 15 and 247 ± 94 on day 29, both p < 0.05. There was no gender difference in these changes. Both the transient increase in CD4/CD8 ratio and the persistent decrease in B-lymphocytes occurred when taking the herbal preparation. It is suggested that the herbal preparation might be producing beneficial immunomodulatory effects during its consumption [24].

The pleasant experience using an innovative anti-influenza Chinese Medicine formula in the SARS crisis of 2007 has prompted us to engage in a repetition of the same protocal with modifications to acquire personal protection against the COVID-19 infection. The emphasis is put on in-depth laboratory studies related to macrophage activities in their support to the innate immunological system in preparation to viral attack. On the other hand, a pilot study also target at the innate immunological changes of volunteers instead of their infection rate, (since Hong Kong had a low infection rate throughout the crisis) [24].

Coronavirus is an enveloped positive-sense RNA virus, which is characterized by club-like spikes projecting from its surface [25]. Macrophages, the major effector cells in the innate immune system, recognizes viral infection through Pattern Recognition Receptors (PRRs), PRRs such as Toll like receptors (TLRs), and RIG-I-like receptor (RLRs), which detect the conserved microbial components called pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs). During infection, TLR and RLR are essential for the recognition of microbial pathogens to activate intracellular signaling pathways for distinct pattern of gene expression that result in innate immune response against microbial infections and the development of antigen-specific acquired immunity. Among various know PRRs, TLR3 responses to double stranded RNA, a replication intermediate for many viruses [26]. TLR3 is therefore involved in antiviral responses by triggering the production of antiviral cytokines such as interferon (IFN), and other Th1 cytokines. RIG-1-like receptors (RLRs), constitute a family of cytoplasmic RNA helicases which are important to initiate the host antiviral responses. For example, RIG-I/retinoicacid-inducible gene 1 has been shown to sense viral RNA, leading to production of type I interferons/IFNs [27]. In our previous studies on by studying adults hospitalized with viral infection, we confirmed that TLRs played play an important role for innate viral inhibition in naturally occurring influenza [28].

The innovative formula adopted from the SARS crisis consists of 12 herbs which are taken from two popular ancient anti-flu formulae: one from the Southern part of China and one from the North. Mixing the idea and tradition between the Northern and Southern of the country carries the assumption that since the formula is meant for the preventive boosting of all Chinese in different regions, it is more desirable to take reference to both Northern and Southern districts (Table 1).

Table 1: Innovative Formula

Folium Mori (??) 3.75 gm
Flos Chrysanthemi (??) 1.5 gm
Semen Armeniacae Amarum (??) 3 gm
Fructus Forsythiae (??) 2.5 gm
Herba Menthae (??) 1.25 gm
Radix Platycodonis (??) 3 gm
Radix Glycyrrhizae (??) 1.25 gm
Rhizoma Phragmitis (??) 3 gm
Radix Scutellariae (??) 6 gm
Folium Isatidis (???) 8 gm
Radix Astragali (??) 7.5 gm
Radix Saposhnikovia (??) 5 gm

Mc Greevey from Harvard, during the early pandemic, called for the attention on Vitamin D as a preventive agent against cold and influenza. He quoted two most informative publications concerned with the use of Vitamin D to protect against Cold and Flu. (29) Scientific evaluations are concentrated on immunological defence while clinical reports are concerned with epidemiological efficacy data. The authors gave good evidences of Vitamin D providing anti-inflammatory effects via innate and adaptive immune responses [30]. On the clinical side, controversial reports did not allow definite conclusions on the preventive efficacy [31]. In view of the lack of effective preventive agent, he advised that Vitamin D should be considered together with other essential nutritives as favorable supplements in the overall support and fight against viral infections [32].

The extended plan of research therefore, would include Vit. D as an additional supplement to the innovative herbal formula to explore for additional or synergistic immunological boosting effects.


Cold and Flu affections most probably have been common for all human beings ever since the pre-historical era. Traditional Chinese Medicine which served the Chinese people since over 3,000 years ago, has valuable records on the use of herbs for the treatment and prevention of febrile illnesses. In the past decades, many of these herbs and herbal formulae have been studied on bioactivity platforms and shown to be anti-inflammatory and immunologically boostering [33,34]. Clinical trials with different levels of reliability have also been done, resulting in observations of plausible but unconfirmed efficacy. The complex immunological responses favouring prevention in situations of viral attacks appear similar to those observed in Vitamin D research related to prevention of cold and flu.

COVID-19 appears to be hitting the health system harder than infected individual patients, since recovery, though unpredictable, could be quick, and mortality tends to be low. The large numbers infected lead to the overloading of health-care facilities and unsurmountable risks and stress for the careers. An agent that possibly improves the general self-defense of the people within the epidemic zone would be of additional value to the future target orientated vaccine: both of them would lead to a smaller number of infected patients. Chinese Medicine has been working on a symptom relief basis. The mild cases apparently are protected from developing into the severe stages. This observation might be similar to a situation of Prevention for the individual when the viral agent is on its way to attack. The attack would not succeed because of the boosted immunological defense of the individual after taking the immuno-supportive medicine.

The research protocol being planned has a major emphasis on the herbal medication’s immunological effects in the laboratory. A pilot clinical trial would be organized to serve as a preliminary investigation on its real preventive effects. The changes in the immunological state of the volunteers would be helpful as further evidence on the preventive value.

None of the constituents of the innovative formula is phytochemically toxic and reported adverse effects have all been mild. Once the complex events which affect the immunological responses during the consumption of the herbal formula could be clearly worked out, its endorsement of application as a personal protection agent, like Vitamin D alone is expected. The platform studies will give evidence-based support to the said formula’s immunological boosting effects, thus giving it solid support for subsequent development into a Preventive Agent against viral respiratory infection at large.

Using Chinese Medicine as self protective supplement during an outbreak of infectious disease apparently has been a wellaccepted public practice in Chinese communities with taken for granted effects. Academics and experts might not consider that in-depth explorations to justify this practice is worthwhile [35]. After the SARS and COVID-19 pandemic, there should be.


This work was supported by the State Key Laboratory Fund provided by the Innovation and Technology Commission of Hong Kong.


1. Leung PC. The efficacy of Chinese Medicine for SARS: A Review of Chinese Publications after the Crisis. AM J Chin Med. 2007; 35: 575- 581.

2. Wang R. Zhou XM., Liang BB. Utilisation analysis of drug efficacy of the 680 cases of SARS patients in Xiao Tang Shan Hospital of PLA. Chin J. Evid Based Med (in Chinese). 2004; 4: 474-481.

3. Lau J, Ko WM, Tam CW, Leung PC. Using Herbal Medicine as a means of prevention - Experience during the SARS Crisis. Am J Chin Med. 2003; 33: 345-356.

4. Poon PM, Wong CK, Fung KP, Fong CY, Wong EL, Lau JT, et al. Immunomodulatory effects of a traditional Chinese medicine with potential antiviral activity: a self-control study. Am J Chin Med. 2006; 34: 13-21.

5. Tang NL, Chan PK, Wong CK, To KF, Wu AK, Sung YM, et al. Early enhanced expression of interferon-inducible protein-10 (CXCL-10) and other chemokines predicts adverse outcome in severe acute respiratory syndrome. Clin Chem. 2005; 51: 2333-2340.

6. Guan WJ, Zheng N, Zhong WS. Clinical characteristics of 2019 novel coronavirus infection in China. MedRxiv preprint. 2019.

7. WHO. China/ Geneva. A Joint Report after an International Inspection on COVID-19 epidemic in China. WHO China. 16-24 February 2020.

8. Chau KW, Wong VT, Tang CW. COVID 19: An Update on the epidemiological, clinical, preventive and therapeutic evidence and guidelines of Integrated Chinese-Western Medicine for the Management. Am J Chin Med. 2020; 48: 1-26.

9. National Bureau of Traditional Chinese Medicine and the Committee on Public Health and Hygiene. Using Qingfeipaidu Decoction as the herbal formula in the Integrated Treatment for COVID19 patients.

10. Choy’s Net. Assimilated reports from the National Health Official Network Feb-Mar 2020.

11. Niu QQ, Chen Y, Zhang Jm-hua. Efficacy and Safety of Lianhua Qingwen capsule for influenza: a system review. China Journal of Materia Medica. 2017; 42: 1474-1481.

12. Jiang PF., Li Sn., Peng QH. Analysis of TCM prevention and treatment schemes for COVID19 in various regions of China.

13. Xu BS, Yas KW, Xu YS. Qingfeipaidu Decoction gives rapid relief in COVID19 patients-Analysis basing on Traditional Chinese Medicine Theories. Zhong ye J. 2020.

14. Jas J, Tien TT, Yang J. Understand the pharmacological effects of Qingfeipaidu Decoction through Traditional Theories. J Chin Herbal Medicine. 2020; 1-7.

15. National Bureau of Traditional Chinese Medicine. Diagnosis of COVID19 pneumonia.[EB/OL]. 2020.

16. Wang RJ, Yang SJ, Xie CG. Clinical Observation of Qingfeipaidu Decoction in the Treatment of Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia. Pharmacology and clinics of Chinese Materia medica.

17. Dan Y, Lui HY, Gao WW. Activities of essential oils from Asarum heterotropoides against five phytopathogens. J Cro Prot. 2010; 29: 295.

18. Zhang J. Review on the toxicity of Asarum. China Folk Medicine. 2010; 49: 52. 19.Zhao ZZ, Liang ZT, Jiang ZH. Comparative study on aristolochic acid and Herba Asari for safe use. Phytomedicine. 2008; 15: 741.

20. Qui ZM, Wang MX, Zhai HQ. Rationality of Asarum in Qingfei paidu Decoction based on literature Analysis. China J of Chinese Medicine. 21.Lam CW, Chan MH, Wong CK. Severe acute respiratory syndrome: clinical and laboratory manifestations. Clin Biochem Rev. 2004; 25: 121-132.

22. Fung KP, Leung PC, Tsui KW, Wan CC, Wong KB, Waye MY, et al. Immunomodulatory activities of the herbal formula Kwan Du Bu Fei Dang in healthy subjects: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Hong Kong Med J. 2011; 17: 41-43.

23. Lau TF, Leung PC, Ko WM. Using herbal medicine as a means of prevention- Experience Drug the SARS crisis. Am J Chin Med. 2005; 33: 345-356.

24. Poon MK, Wong CK, Wong ELY, Leung PC, Lam WK. Immunomodulatory Effects of a Traditional Chinese Medicine Formula with Potential Anti Viral Activities. Am J Chin Med. 2006; 34: 13-21.

25. Phan T. Novel coronavirus: From discovery to clinical diagnostics. Infect Genet Evol. 2020; 79: 104211.

26. Hopkins PA, Sriskandan S. Mammalian Toll-like receptors: to immunity and beyond. Clin Exp Immunol. 2005; 140: 395-407.

27. Loo YM, Gale M Jr. Immune signaling by RIG-I-like receptors. Immunity. 2011; 34: 680-692.

28. Lee N, Wong CK, Hui DS, Lee SK, Wong RY, et al. Role of human Toll-like receptors in naturally occurring influenza A infections. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2013; 7: 666-675.

29. Mc Greevey S, Morrison M. Study Confirms Vitamin D protects against Cold and Flu. The Harvard Grazeet. 2017.

30. Gruber-Bzura BM. Vitamin D and Influenza - Prevention or Therapy. Int J Mol Sci. 2018; 19: E2419.

31.Martireau AR, Jolliffe DA, Greenberg L, Aloia JF, Camargo CA, et al. Vitamin D supplementation to prevent acute respiratory tract infections: Systemic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data. BMJ. 2017; 356: i6583.

32. Lin L, YJ Xu, He DP, Lin ZX. A retrospective study on clinical features of and treatment methods of or SARS patients. Am J Clin Med. 2003; 31: 821-839.

33. Chen CN, Lin PC, Huang KK, Hsu TA. Inhibition of SARSCOV 3C-Like protease activity by Theaflavin-3, 3’-diagallate. eCAM. 2005; 2: 209- 215.

34. Lau KM, Lee KM, Koon CM, Cheung CS, Lau CP, et al. Immunomodulatory and anti-SARS activities of Houttuynia cordata. J Ethnopharmacol. 2008; 118: 79-85.

35. Luo H, Tang QL, Liu JP. Can Chinese Medicine be used for Prevention of Corona Virus Disease. A Review of Historical classics, research evidence and current Prevention Program. Chin J Integr Med. 2020; 17: 1-8

Ping-Chung L, Chung-Lap Ben C, Chun-Kwok W (2020) Clinical Use of Chinese Medicine in the Current COVID-19 Crisis and Related Research Planning. Clin Res Infect Dis 5(1): 1054.

Received : 12 May 2020
Accepted : 09 Jun 2020
Published : 11 Jun 2020
Annals of Otolaryngology and Rhinology
ISSN : 2379-948X
Launched : 2014
JSM Schizophrenia
Launched : 2016
Journal of Nausea
Launched : 2020
JSM Internal Medicine
Launched : 2016
JSM Hepatitis
Launched : 2016
JSM Oro Facial Surgeries
ISSN : 2578-3211
Launched : 2016
Journal of Human Nutrition and Food Science
ISSN : 2333-6706
Launched : 2013
JSM Regenerative Medicine and Bioengineering
ISSN : 2379-0490
Launched : 2013
JSM Spine
ISSN : 2578-3181
Launched : 2016
Archives of Palliative Care
ISSN : 2573-1165
Launched : 2016
JSM Nutritional Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3203
Launched : 2017
Annals of Neurodegenerative Disorders
ISSN : 2476-2032
Launched : 2016
Journal of Fever
ISSN : 2641-7782
Launched : 2017
JSM Bone Marrow Research
ISSN : 2578-3351
Launched : 2016
JSM Mathematics and Statistics
ISSN : 2578-3173
Launched : 2014
Journal of Autoimmunity and Research
ISSN : 2573-1173
Launched : 2014
JSM Arthritis
ISSN : 2475-9155
Launched : 2016
JSM Head and Neck Cancer-Cases and Reviews
ISSN : 2573-1610
Launched : 2016
JSM General Surgery Cases and Images
ISSN : 2573-1564
Launched : 2016
JSM Anatomy and Physiology
ISSN : 2573-1262
Launched : 2016
JSM Dental Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1548
Launched : 2016
Annals of Emergency Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1017
Launched : 2016
Annals of Mens Health and Wellness
ISSN : 2641-7707
Launched : 2017
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Health Care
ISSN : 2576-0084
Launched : 2018
Journal of Chronic Diseases and Management
ISSN : 2573-1300
Launched : 2016
Annals of Vaccines and Immunization
ISSN : 2378-9379
Launched : 2014
JSM Heart Surgery Cases and Images
ISSN : 2578-3157
Launched : 2016
Annals of Reproductive Medicine and Treatment
ISSN : 2573-1092
Launched : 2016
JSM Brain Science
ISSN : 2573-1289
Launched : 2016
JSM Biomarkers
ISSN : 2578-3815
Launched : 2014
JSM Biology
ISSN : 2475-9392
Launched : 2016
Archives of Stem Cell and Research
ISSN : 2578-3580
Launched : 2014
Annals of Clinical and Medical Microbiology
ISSN : 2578-3629
Launched : 2014
JSM Pediatric Surgery
ISSN : 2578-3149
Launched : 2017
Journal of Memory Disorder and Rehabilitation
ISSN : 2578-319X
Launched : 2016
JSM Tropical Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2578-3165
Launched : 2016
JSM Head and Face Medicine
ISSN : 2578-3793
Launched : 2016
JSM Cardiothoracic Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1297
Launched : 2016
JSM Bone and Joint Diseases
ISSN : 2578-3351
Launched : 2017
JSM Bioavailability and Bioequivalence
ISSN : 2641-7812
Launched : 2017
JSM Atherosclerosis
ISSN : 2573-1270
Launched : 2016
Journal of Genitourinary Disorders
ISSN : 2641-7790
Launched : 2017
Journal of Fractures and Sprains
ISSN : 2578-3831
Launched : 2016
Journal of Autism and Epilepsy
ISSN : 2641-7774
Launched : 2016
Annals of Marine Biology and Research
ISSN : 2573-105X
Launched : 2014
JSM Health Education & Primary Health Care
ISSN : 2578-3777
Launched : 2016
JSM Communication Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3807
Launched : 2016
Annals of Musculoskeletal Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3599
Launched : 2016
Annals of Virology and Research
ISSN : 2573-1122
Launched : 2014
JSM Renal Medicine
ISSN : 2573-1637
Launched : 2016
Journal of Muscle Health
ISSN : 2578-3823
Launched : 2016
JSM Genetics and Genomics
ISSN : 2334-1823
Launched : 2013
JSM Anxiety and Depression
ISSN : 2475-9139
Launched : 2016
Clinical Journal of Heart Diseases
ISSN : 2641-7766
Launched : 2016
Annals of Medicinal Chemistry and Research
ISSN : 2378-9336
Launched : 2014
JSM Pain and Management
ISSN : 2578-3378
Launched : 2016
JSM Women's Health
ISSN : 2578-3696
Launched : 2016
Clinical Research in HIV or AIDS
ISSN : 2374-0094
Launched : 2013
Journal of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Obesity
ISSN : 2333-6692
Launched : 2013
Journal of Substance Abuse and Alcoholism
ISSN : 2373-9363
Launched : 2013
JSM Neurosurgery and Spine
ISSN : 2373-9479
Launched : 2013
Journal of Liver and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2379-0830
Launched : 2014
Journal of Drug Design and Research
ISSN : 2379-089X
Launched : 2014
JSM Clinical Oncology and Research
ISSN : 2373-938X
Launched : 2013
JSM Bioinformatics, Genomics and Proteomics
ISSN : 2576-1102
Launched : 2014
JSM Chemistry
ISSN : 2334-1831
Launched : 2013
Journal of Trauma and Care
ISSN : 2573-1246
Launched : 2014
JSM Surgical Oncology and Research
ISSN : 2578-3688
Launched : 2016
Annals of Food Processing and Preservation
ISSN : 2573-1033
Launched : 2016
Journal of Radiology and Radiation Therapy
ISSN : 2333-7095
Launched : 2013
JSM Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
ISSN : 2578-3572
Launched : 2016
Annals of Clinical Pathology
ISSN : 2373-9282
Launched : 2013
Annals of Cardiovascular Diseases
ISSN : 2641-7731
Launched : 2016
Journal of Behavior
ISSN : 2576-0076
Launched : 2016
Annals of Clinical and Experimental Metabolism
ISSN : 2572-2492
Launched : 2016
JSM Microbiology
ISSN : 2333-6455
Launched : 2013
Journal of Urology and Research
ISSN : 2379-951X
Launched : 2014
Journal of Family Medicine and Community Health
ISSN : 2379-0547
Launched : 2013
Annals of Pregnancy and Care
ISSN : 2578-336X
Launched : 2017
JSM Cell and Developmental Biology
ISSN : 2379-061X
Launched : 2013
Annals of Aquaculture and Research
ISSN : 2379-0881
Launched : 2014
Clinical Research in Pulmonology
ISSN : 2333-6625
Launched : 2013
Journal of Immunology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2333-6714
Launched : 2013
Annals of Forensic Research and Analysis
ISSN : 2378-9476
Launched : 2014
JSM Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
ISSN : 2333-7109
Launched : 2013
Annals of Breast Cancer Research
ISSN : 2641-7685
Launched : 2016
Annals of Gerontology and Geriatric Research
ISSN : 2378-9409
Launched : 2014
Journal of Sleep Medicine and Disorders
ISSN : 2379-0822
Launched : 2014
JSM Burns and Trauma
ISSN : 2475-9406
Launched : 2016
Chemical Engineering and Process Techniques
ISSN : 2333-6633
Launched : 2013
Annals of Clinical Cytology and Pathology
ISSN : 2475-9430
Launched : 2014
JSM Allergy and Asthma
ISSN : 2573-1254
Launched : 2016
Journal of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
ISSN : 2334-2307
Launched : 2013
Annals of Sports Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2379-0571
Launched : 2014
JSM Sexual Medicine
ISSN : 2578-3718
Launched : 2016
Annals of Vascular Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2378-9344
Launched : 2014
JSM Biotechnology and Biomedical Engineering
ISSN : 2333-7117
Launched : 2013
Journal of Hematology and Transfusion
ISSN : 2333-6684
Launched : 2013
JSM Environmental Science and Ecology
ISSN : 2333-7141
Launched : 2013
Journal of Cardiology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2333-6676
Launched : 2013
JSM Nanotechnology and Nanomedicine
ISSN : 2334-1815
Launched : 2013
Journal of Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders
ISSN : 2475-9473
Launched : 2016
JSM Ophthalmology
ISSN : 2333-6447
Launched : 2013
Journal of Pharmacology and Clinical Toxicology
ISSN : 2333-7079
Launched : 2013
Annals of Psychiatry and Mental Health
ISSN : 2374-0124
Launched : 2013
Medical Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
ISSN : 2333-6439
Launched : 2013
Annals of Pediatrics and Child Health
ISSN : 2373-9312
Launched : 2013
JSM Clinical Pharmaceutics
ISSN : 2379-9498
Launched : 2014
JSM Foot and Ankle
ISSN : 2475-9112
Launched : 2016
JSM Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementia
ISSN : 2378-9565
Launched : 2014
Journal of Addiction Medicine and Therapy
ISSN : 2333-665X
Launched : 2013
Journal of Veterinary Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2378-931X
Launched : 2013
Annals of Public Health and Research
ISSN : 2378-9328
Launched : 2014
Annals of Orthopedics and Rheumatology
ISSN : 2373-9290
Launched : 2013
Journal of Clinical Nephrology and Research
ISSN : 2379-0652
Launched : 2014
Annals of Community Medicine and Practice
ISSN : 2475-9465
Launched : 2014
Annals of Biometrics and Biostatistics
ISSN : 2374-0116
Launched : 2013
JSM Clinical Case Reports
ISSN : 2373-9819
Launched : 2013
Journal of Cancer Biology and Research
ISSN : 2373-9436
Launched : 2013
Journal of Surgery and Transplantation Science
ISSN : 2379-0911
Launched : 2013
Journal of Dermatology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2373-9371
Launched : 2013
JSM Gastroenterology and Hepatology
ISSN : 2373-9487
Launched : 2013
Annals of Nursing and Practice
ISSN : 2379-9501
Launched : 2014
JSM Dentistry
ISSN : 2333-7133
Launched : 2013
Author Information X