Loading

Clinical Research in Infectious Diseases

Guideline-Concordant Antibiotic Prescribing for Pediatric Outpatients with Otitis Media, Community-Acquired Pneumonia, and Skin and Soft Tissue Infections in a Large Multi Specialty Health Care System

Short Communication | Open Access | Volume 2 | Issue 1

  • 1. Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, USA
  • 2. Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, USA
  • 3. Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Mayo Clinic, USA
+ Show More - Show Less
Corresponding Authors
Ezzeldin A Saleh, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Duke University Medical Center, 2301 Erwin Rd, Durham, NC27710, USA, Tel: 919-684-6335; Fax: 919-668-4859
Abstract

Antibiotics are commonly prescribed in pediatric outpatient settings; however, efforts to decrease in appropriate use have largely focused on inpatients. We obtained baseline metrics to identify conditions that may benefit from establishment of outpatient antimicrobial stewardship interventions(ASP).We evaluated rates and appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing for children with acute otitis media(AOM), community acquired pneumonia (CAP), and skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI) in ambulatory settings within a large health care system in the US Midwest. We retrospectively reviewed 77, 821visits and associated diagnostic codes for children less than17years seen in ambulatory settings within our health system from August1, 2009 to July31, 2010. We measured rates of antibiotic prescribing by location, provider type, patient age, and diagnosis, and assessed concordance with treatment guidelines for AOM, CAP, and SSTI. AOM, CAP, and SSTI comprised about1/3 of all infections in the study population. Antibiotics were prescribed in 14,543 (18.7%) visits. Antibiotic prescribing rates were 1.1 to 1.2 times higher among Emergency Room (ER) providers compared to Pediatricians and Family Physicians. Antibiotics prescribed for AOM and SSTI were concordant with guidelines in approximately 97% of cases. In contrast, 47% of antibiotics prescribed for treatment of CAP in children< 5years old were macrolides, which are not recommended first line therapy for CAP in this age group. Antibiotic prescribing for pediatric out patients with in our health system is not guideline concordant for treatment of CAP.

Keywords

• Pediatrics

• Antimicrobial stewardship

• Otitis Media

• Pneumonia

• Skin and soft tissue infections

Citation

Saleh EA, Schroeder DR, Hanson AC, Banerjee R (2015) Guideline-Concordant Antibiotic Prescribing for Pediatric Outpatients with Otitis Media, Community-Acquired Pneumonia, and Skin and Soft Tissue Infections in a Large Multi Specialty Health Care System. Clin Res Infect Dis 2(1): 1010.

ABBREVIATIONS

ASP: Antimicrobial Stewardship Program; AOM: Acute Otitis Media; CAP: Community Acquired Pneumonia; SSTI: Skin and Soft Tissue Infections; ER: Emergency Room; MRSA: MethicillinResistant Staphylococcus Aureus; FH-MCHS: Franciscan Healthcare Mayo Clinic Health System; EMR: Electronic Medical Records

INTRODUCTION

Antibiotics are the most commonly prescribed medications to children across all age groups. One fifth of all pediatric ambulatory visits result in an antibiotic prescription [1]. Despite an overall decline in antibiotic prescribing for US children [2,3] inappropriate use of expensive broad spectrum antibiotics is rising [4], which substantially increases health costs, promotes bacterial resistance, and contributes to increasing rates of antibiotic associated adverse effects. Outpatient antibiotic over use has been correlated with higher rates of antibiotic resistant pathogens [5,6]. In an effort to combat the emergence of drug resistance, the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) published guidelines for developing antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs).

ASPs are coordinated interventions designed to measure and improve the appropriate use of antibiotics, with goals of improving clinical outcomes, minimizing adverse events, limiting emergence of drug resistance and reducing costs [7]. Development and implementation of clinical pathways for management of common infections is an integral part of ASPs. Accordingly, clinical practice guidelines have been developed for management of common infections including AOM [8], CAP [9], and a common cause of skin and soft tissue infections, methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections (MRSA) [10]. Notably, both AOM and pediatric CAP guidelines emphasize the use of narrow-spectrum antibiotics as first line therapy for these conditions [8,9,11,12].

Despite increasing data about inpatient pediatric ASPs, relatively few studies describe the effectiveness of ASPs in pediatric ambulatory settings [13,14]. Further research is needed to describe antibiotic use in community settings and design and implement targeted interventions that optimize antibiotic use among out patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate the rates and appropriateness of outpatient antibiotic prescribing for children with three common infectious diseases, AOM, CAP and SSTI, in order to identify areas for outpatient stewardship interventions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study Design and Setting

We performed a retrospective analysis of ambulatory pediatric visits with in Franciscan Healthcare Mayo Clinic Health System (FH-MCHS), which includes locations in western Wisconsin, eastern Minnesota and northeastern Iowa. FHSMCHS employs 92 providers: 7pediatricians, 56 family medicine physicians, 15 family medicine physician assistants and nurse practitioners, 13 ER and urgent care physicians and 1urgent care physician assistant. This study was approved by the FH-MCHS and Mayo Clinic institutional review boards. We abstracted patient age, encounter provider and location, and antibiotics prescribed from the electronic medical records (EMR). We excluded topical, antiviral and anti parasitic antimicrobials. Diagnosis codes were extracted from the ambulatory billing claim system that uses the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes. These data were integrated with the EMR encounter before final analysis using Statistical Analysis System software (SAS). We excluded inpatient hospital visits, subspecialty and nurse visits, and diagnostic codes for procedures and immunizations. Infection related diagnostic codes were classified into four categories: AOM, CAP, SSTI, and other infections. Appropriate antibiotics for each indication were defined as those listed as first or second line therapy in published treatment guidelines [8-10]. For AOM treatment, penicillin, amoxicillin, and amoxicillin-clavulanate were considered first line agents, while macrolides, cephalosporins, tetracyclines, and clindamycin were considered second line agents. For CAP, penicillin or amoxicillin were considered first line treatments, as were macrolides in children>5years, while amoxicillin-clavulanate and second or third generation cephalosporins (in case of penicillin allergy) were considered second line or alternative treatments. For SSTI, we were not able to differentiate purulent lesions from non purulent lesions; therefore, in accordance with published guidelines [15] we considered agents with activity against either staphylococci or streptococci as first line therapy: trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, clindamycin, doxycycline, minocycline, penicillin, and amoxicillin and first generation cephalosporins. Amoxicillin-clavulanate was considered a second line agent for SSTI.

Study population

We included all children ≤ 17years, seen at the Franciscan Healthcare Mayo Clinic Health System (FH-MCHS) from August1, 2009 until July31, 2010.

Statistical Analysis

Visit rates for infections were calculated for each of the 4categories (AOM, CAP, SSTI, and other) and expressed as the number of visits with the given diagnosis per 1,000 patient visits. Visit rates are presented using point estimates and 95% confidence intervals and compared across provider type using the Chi-Square test. Of patients diagnosed with an infection, the percentage prescribed antibiotics was calculated overall and also according to patient age and provider type. Prescription percentages are compared across groups using the Chi-Square test. P-values less than 0.05 were considered significant.

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Results

Approximately 22,576 children were evaluated during 88,887 visits. We excluded 11,066 (12.4%) visits and 3,350 (18%) medication orders, because of mismatching identifiers or visit dates. Among the 77,821 visits included in the study, anti-bacteria’s were prescribed in14, 543 (18.7%). Patient volume varied widely among the various clinic locations, rangingfrom1, 967(2%) to 21,953 (28%). Most patients were seen by providers in Family Medicine (63%), followed by Pediatrics (27%), and Emergency/Urgent care (10%). Across all sites, 27, 298 visits (35%) resulted in infection related diagnoses. The proportion of all infection related diagnoses was 27.3% for AOM, 3.7% for SSTI, and 3.4% for CAP. Visit rates and antibiotic prescription rates for AOM, SSTI, and CAP differed significantly across the three provider types (Table 1).

Table 1: Visit and antibiotic prescription rates by provider type for pediatric outpatients diagnosed with AOM, CAP, and SSTI at FH-MCHS, August 2009- July 2010.

  Family Medicine clinics Pediatric clinics Emergency Department Family Medicine clinics Pediatric clinics Emergency Department
AOM 77.8 (75.4 to 80.3) 110.5 (106.2 to 114.7) 145.4 (138.6 to 152.1) 78.6 (77.3 to 80.0) 74.1 (72.3 to 75.8) 89.7 (88.2 to 91.3)
CAP 11.0 (10.0 to 11.9) 12.1 (10.6 to 13.6) 14.7 (12.4 to 17.0) 58.7 (54.4 to 63.0) 59.9 (53.9 to 65.9) 72.3 (65.2 to 79.3)
SSTI 11.8 (10.8 to 12.8) 11.9 (10.5 to 13.4) 19.3 (16.7 to 21.9) 69.3 (65.4 to 73.2) 62.9 (56.9 to 68.8) 77.3 (71.6 to 83.1)
Other infections 220.2 (216.4 to 224.0) 179.9 (174.8 to 185.1) 367.9 (358.7 to 377.1) 31.2 (30.3 to 32.1) 23.7 (22.4 to 25.1) 29.1 (27.7 to 91.3)

aThe visit rate represents the number of patients with the given diagnosis per 1,000 patient visits at the given location.
bthe antibiotic prescription percentage represents the percentage of patient visits at the given location with the given diagnosis that was prescribed an antibiotic. AOM= Acute otitis

Abbreviations: AOM=Acute otitis media; CAP=Community Acquired Pneumonia; SSTI=Skin and Soft Tissue Infections; FH-MCHS=Franciscan Healthcare-Mayo Clinic Health System; CI=Confidence Interval

For all three diagnoses, visit rates and antibiotic prescription rates were greater in the ER compared to Family Medicine and Pediatric clinics (Table 1).Antimicrobials were prescribed more frequently in patients with AOM compared to CAP or SSTI (79.5%, 61.3% and 69.3% for AOM, CAP and SSTI respectively; p<0.001). Among all antibiotic orders, penicillin and amoxicillin were the most commonly prescribed agents (43.9%), followed by macrolides (20.5%) and beta-lactam/beta-actamase inhibitors (13.5%). The most commonly prescribed antibiotic classes for AOM, CAP and SSTI were penicillins (56.3%), macrolides (55.2%), and first generation cephalosporins (44%), respectively. (Figure 1).

Antibiotic prescriptions by infection type in pediatric outpatients at FH- MCHS August 2009-July 2010 Number of prescriptions per diagnosis: N=5928 for AOM; N=563 for CAP; N=693 for SSTI. FH-MCHS=Franciscan Healthcare Mayo Clinic Health System, AOM=Acute Otitis Media, CAP=Community Acquired Pneumonia, SSTI= Skinands of Tissue Infections.

Figure 1: Antibiotic prescriptions by infection type in pediatric outpatients at FH- MCHS August 2009-July 2010 Number of prescriptions per diagnosis: N=5928 for AOM; N=563 for CAP; N=693 for SSTI. FH-MCHS=Franciscan Healthcare Mayo Clinic Health System, AOM=Acute Otitis Media, CAP=Community Acquired Pneumonia, SSTI= Skinands of Tissue Infections.

Notably, 20% of AOM visits were not associated with an antibiotic prescription. Macrolides were the most commonly prescribed antibiotic for CAP, accounting for 47% of prescriptions in children less than 5years of age with CAP, and half or more of patients with CAP who received an antibiotic in the emergency room (59%), family medicine clinics (57%), or pediatric clinics (49%) (Figure 1). Guideline concordant prescribing varied by diagnosis. Among antibiotics prescribed for AOM, 73.1% were guideline recommended first line treatments, 24.4% were second line treatments that would only be appropriate in cases of penicillin allergy, and 2.5% were sulfonamides, which are not recommended for AOM treatment (Figure 2) [8].

Proportion of guideline-concordant antibiotics prescribed for children by type of infection at FH-MCHS August 2009-July2010 AOM: first line treatment, Amoxicillin or amoxicillin-clavulanate; second line treatment, cefdinir, ceftriaxone and clindamycin; not recommended, sulfonamides. CAP: first line treatment penicillin or amoxicillin, macrolides (for>5to17years); second line/alternative treatment, amoxicillin-clavulanate, second or third generation cephalosporins; not recommended, macrolides (for children<5years). SSTI: first line treatment, penicillin, amoxicillin, cephalexin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, clindamycin, doxycycline and minocycline; second line treatment, amoxicillin-clavulanate; not recommended, second/third generation cephalosporins. Number of prescriptions per diagnosis: N=5844 for AOM, N=551 for CAP, N=681 for SSTI. Patients receiving multiple concurrent antibiotics were excluded (N=84forAOM; N=12 for CAP, and N=12 for SSTI).

Figure2: Proportion of guideline-concordant antibiotics prescribed for children by type of infection at FH-MCHS August 2009-July2010

AOM: first line treatment, Amoxicillin or amoxicillin-clavulanate; second line treatment, cefdinir, ceftriaxone and clindamycin; not recommended, sulfonamides. CAP: first line treatment penicillin or amoxicillin, macrolides (for>5to17years); second line/alternative treatment, amoxicillin-clavulanate, second or third generation cephalosporins; not recommended, macrolides (for children<5years). SSTI: first line treatment, penicillin, amoxicillin, cephalexin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, clindamycin, doxycycline and minocycline; second line treatment, amoxicillin-clavulanate; not recommended, second/third generation cephalosporins. Number of prescriptions per diagnosis: N=5844 for AOM, N=551 for CAP, N=681 for SSTI. Patients receiving multiple concurrent antibiotics were excluded (N=84forAOM; N=12 for CAP, and N=12 for SSTI).

Prescriptions for CAP were first or second line agents in 77.5%, and antibiotics that were not recommended in 22.5%. For SSTI, 78.3% of prescriptions were first line drugs, while 21.7% were drugs that are not considered first line therapy [10,15].

Discussion

Overall and diagnosis specific antibiotic prescribing rates were higher in the ER compared to other outpatient clinics. For management of CAP, antibiotic selection was frequently discordant with published treatment guidelines, with nearly half of children<5years receiving macrolides rather than first line antibiotics (Figure 2). Our findings demonstrate that quantification and evaluation of antibiotic use, a cornerstone of antimicrobial stewardship, is feasible in outpatient pediatric settings, and identifies CAP treatment as a target for outpatient stewardship interventions. Although ER visits comprised only10% of all visits, visits rates for AOM, CAP, and SSTI were consistently higher in the ER compared to outpatient clinics. This undoubtedly reflects the high acuity of care in ER visits compared to clinic visits, many of which were well child evaluations. Increased acuity among ER visits likely also explains the higher rate of antibiotic prescribing in the ER. Our finding is similar to other studies that noted higher antibiotic prescribing among ER providers and family practitioners than pediatricians [16].

In our health system, 18.7% of the visits resulted in antibiotic prescribing, comparable to the national rate of 21% [1]. Also similar to other studies, within our health system penicillins remained the most commonly prescribed class of antibiotics [1,17] and the macrolide prescription rate was fairly high at 20.5% [1]. Particularly worrisome is the high rate of macrolide use for treatment of CAP in children less than 5years that we observed. This is in contrast to the recent CAP treatment guide lines, which recommend macrolides for treatment of typical respiratory pathogens, primarily in school age children and adolescents, and emphasize use of narrow spectrum penicillins (or cephalosporins for penicillin allergic patients) as first line therapy for the most common causative bacteria, Streptococcus pneumoniae [9], which is increasingly resistant to macrolides. In fact, our local pediatric antibiogram for 2010 indicated that Streptococcus pneumoniae, was only 50% susceptible to macrolides. Reliance on macrolides for treatment of pediatric CAP has been previously described; national estimates before the publication of CAP guidelines showed that macrolides were the most commonly prescribed antibiotics in pediatric CAP [9]. The higher percentage of macrolide use by family medicine and ER providers compared to pediatricians may reflect their commended practice for treatment of CAP in adults with macrolides. Our study preceded publication of the pediatric CAP guidelines, likely contributing to some of the guideline-discrepant antibiotic prescribing for CAP within our health system.

Conversely, familiarity with AOM and MRSA treatment guidelines, which were published several years prior to our study, likely explains the higher rate of guideline concordant antibiotic prescribing for these diagnoses.

Recently, Gerber et al. Demonstrated improvement in antibiotic prescribing in outpatient settings after implementation of an ASP intervention involving provider education and audit and feedback. In this study, broad spectrum antibiotic prescribing decreased from 26.8% to 14.3% in the intervention group compared to 28.4% to 22.6% in the control group. Furthermore, after the intervention, guideline discordant prescribing for CAP decreased from 15.7% to 402% [14].

Unfortunately, the benefits of this intervention were not durable after discontinuation of audit and feedback [18]. In our institution, the results of the current study led to new antimicrobial stewardship efforts including provider education sessions, and dissemination of treatment guidelines in both electronic and pocket card formats. Future antimicrobial stewardship efforts within our health system should focus on increasing provider awareness of pediatric CAP guidelines and follow up evaluation of macrolide use. Achieving sustained, appropriate antimicrobial prescribing will likely require multiple interventions like provider education sessions, electronic decision support systems that facilitate guideline concordant antibiotic ordering, and ongoing audit of antibiotic orders with appropriate feedback to prescribers. Study strengths are that we examined a large inclusive sample of all pediatric outpatients in our health system, demonstrating the feasibility of obtaining antibiotic utilization data in a large multicenter outpatient practice. The study period spanned over one year to avoid seasonal variation in illness that may affect antibiotic prescribing.

Study limitations

Electronic data retrieval of antibiotics prescribed outside of our health system or by telephone was not feasible. We did not evaluate appropriate dosing or length of antibiotic treatment. We did not capture medication allergies or microbiology results and thus were unable to distinguish if use of second line or alternative antibiotics were, in fact, appropriately prescribed to avoid drug allergy or to treat atypical respiratory pathogens causing CAP. We did not collect detailed demographic or clinical data and thus could not adjust rates based on patient level factors. In addition, we were unable to capture the “watchful waiting” option for otitis media, so the antibiotic prescription rate may be falsely elevated for AOM. Furthermore, clinical outcomes and costs associated with antibiotic prescribing were beyond the scope of the study. Lastly, although the multi site approach in our study enhances generalizability, we cannot generalize our findings too their practices with different patient populations and antimicrobial resistance rates.

CONCLUSION

Antibiotic prescribing for pediatric outpatients within our health system is guideline concordant for treatment of AOM and SSTI but not CAP. Antimicrobial stewardship interventions are needed to optimize out patient management of CAP in children, especially among ER providers, the group with the highest antibiotic prescription rates. Interventions to increase provider awareness of the pediatric CAP guidelines, and decision support at the time of antibiotic ordering for CAP have potential to improve appropriate antibiotic prescribing. Furthermore, as AOM is the diagnosis for which most antibiotics are prescribed in children, continued attention to judicious prescribing for AOM and routine use of the “watchful waiting” option remains essential.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank the following for their work: Cullen Finnian, Debra Clanin, Sherry Grass, and Cheryl R eagles. We also acknowledge the support from Dr. Jennifer Brumm and the Pediatric Department staff at FH-MCS La Crosse. Dr. Saleh is the recipient of a SOAR-grant (System-Oriented and Applied Research) from the Mayo Clinic Health System and received support through the Mayo Clinic Center for Clinical and Translational Science.

Funding was provided by a Mayo Clinic SOAR (System-Oriented and Applied Research) grant. This publication was made possible by CTSA Grant Number UL1TR000135 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official view of NIH.

REFERENCES

1. Hersh AL, Shapiro DJ, Pavia AT, Shah SS. Antibiotic prescribing in ambulatory pediatrics in the United States. Pediatrics. 2011; 128: 1053-1061.

2. Greene SK, Kleinman KP, Lakoma MD, Rifas-Shiman SL, Lee GM, Huang SS, Finkelstein JA. Trends in antibiotic use in Massachusetts children. 2000-2009. Pediatrics. 2012; 130: 15-22.

3. Halasa NB, Griffin MR, Zhu Y, Edwards KM. Decreased number of antibiotic prescriptions in office-based settings from 1993 to 1999 in children less than five years of age. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2002; 21: 1023-1028.

4. Dooling KL, Shapiro DJ, Van Beneden C, Hersh AL, Hicks LA. Overprescribing and inappropriate antibiotic selection for children with pharyngitis in the United States, 1997-2010. JAMA Pediatr. 2014; 168: 1073-1074.

5. MacDougall C, Powell JP, Johnson CK, Edmond MB, Polk RE. Hospital and community fluoroquinolone use and resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli in 17 US hospitals. Clin Infect Dis. 2005; 41: 435-440.

6. Hicks LA, Chien YW, Taylor TH Jr, Haber M, Klugman KP; Active Bacterial Core Surveillance (ABCs) Team. Outpatient antibiotic prescribing and nonsusceptible Streptococcus pneumoniae in the United States, 1996-2003. Clin Infect Dis. 2011; 53: 631-639.

7. Dellit TH, Owens RC, McGowan JE Jr, Gerding DN ,Weinstein RA, Burke JP, et al. Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America guidelines for developing an institutional program to enhance antimicrobial stewardship. Clin Infect Dis. 2007; 44: 159-77.

8. American Academy of Pediatrics Subcommittee on Management of Acute Otitis Media. Diagnosis and management of acute otitis media. Pediatrics. 2004; 113: 1451-1465.

9. Bradley JS, Byington CL, Shah SS, Alverson B, Carter ER, Harrison C, et al. The management of community-acquired pneumonia in infants and children older than 3months of age: clinical practice guidelines by the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society and the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2011; 53: 25-76.

10. Liu C, Bayer A, Cosgrove SE, Daum RS, Fridkin SK, Gorwitz RJ, et al. Clinical practice guidelines by the infectious diseases society of America for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in adults and children. Clin Infect Dis. 2011; 52: 18- 55.

11. Klein JO. The burden of otitis media.Vaccine.2000; 19: 2-8.

12. Lieberthal AS, Carroll AE, Chonmaitree T, Ganiats TG, Hoberman A, Jackson MA, Joffe MD. The diagnosis and management of acute otitis media. Pediatrics. 2013; 131: 964-999.

13. Finkelstein JA, Davis RL, Dowell SF, Metlay JP, Soumerai SB, Rifas-Shiman SL, et al. Reducing antibiotic use in children: a randomized trial in 12 practices. Pediatrics. 2001; 108: 1-7.

14. Gerber JS, Prasad PA, Fiks AG, Localio AR, Grundmeier RW, Bell LM, Wasserman RC. Effect of an outpatient antimicrobial stewardship intervention on broad-spectrum antibiotic prescribing by primary care pediatricians: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2013; 309: 2345-2352.

15. Stevens DL, Bisno AL, Chambers HF, Dellinger EP, Goldstein EJ, Gorbach SL, et al. Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of skin and soft tissue infections: 2014 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2014; 59: 10-52.

16. Nadeem Ahmed M, Muyot MM, Begum S, Smith P, Little C, Windemuller FJ. Antibiotic prescription pattern for viral respiratory illness in emergency room and ambulatory care settings. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2010; 49: 542-547.

17. Vaz LE, Kleinman KP, Raebel MA, Nordin JD, Lakoma MD, Dutta-Linn MM, Finkelstein JA. Recent trends in outpatient antibiotic use in children. Pediatrics. 2014; 133: 375-385.

18. Gerber JS, Prasad PA, Fiks AG, Localio AR, Bell LM, Keren R, Zaoutis TE. Durability of benefits of an outpatient antimicrobial stewardship intervention after discontinuation of audit and feedback. JAMA. 2014; 312: 2569-2570.

Saleh EA, Schroeder DR, Hanson AC, Banerjee R (2015) Guideline-Concordant Antibiotic Prescribing for Pediatric Outpatients with Otitis Media, Community-Acquired Pneumonia, and Skin and Soft Tissue Infections in a Large Multi Specialty Health Care System. Clin Res Infect Dis 2(1): 1010.

Received : 24 Nov 2014
Accepted : 08 Jan 2015
Published : 10 Jan 2015
Journals
Annals of Otolaryngology and Rhinology
ISSN : 2379-948X
Launched : 2014
JSM Schizophrenia
Launched : 2016
Journal of Nausea
Launched : 2020
JSM Internal Medicine
Launched : 2016
JSM Hepatitis
Launched : 2016
JSM Oro Facial Surgeries
ISSN : 2578-3211
Launched : 2016
Journal of Human Nutrition and Food Science
ISSN : 2333-6706
Launched : 2013
JSM Regenerative Medicine and Bioengineering
ISSN : 2379-0490
Launched : 2013
JSM Spine
ISSN : 2578-3181
Launched : 2016
Archives of Palliative Care
ISSN : 2573-1165
Launched : 2016
JSM Nutritional Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3203
Launched : 2017
Annals of Neurodegenerative Disorders
ISSN : 2476-2032
Launched : 2016
Journal of Fever
ISSN : 2641-7782
Launched : 2017
JSM Bone Marrow Research
ISSN : 2578-3351
Launched : 2016
JSM Mathematics and Statistics
ISSN : 2578-3173
Launched : 2014
Journal of Autoimmunity and Research
ISSN : 2573-1173
Launched : 2014
JSM Arthritis
ISSN : 2475-9155
Launched : 2016
JSM Head and Neck Cancer-Cases and Reviews
ISSN : 2573-1610
Launched : 2016
JSM General Surgery Cases and Images
ISSN : 2573-1564
Launched : 2016
JSM Anatomy and Physiology
ISSN : 2573-1262
Launched : 2016
JSM Dental Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1548
Launched : 2016
Annals of Emergency Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1017
Launched : 2016
Annals of Mens Health and Wellness
ISSN : 2641-7707
Launched : 2017
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Health Care
ISSN : 2576-0084
Launched : 2018
Journal of Chronic Diseases and Management
ISSN : 2573-1300
Launched : 2016
Annals of Vaccines and Immunization
ISSN : 2378-9379
Launched : 2014
JSM Heart Surgery Cases and Images
ISSN : 2578-3157
Launched : 2016
Annals of Reproductive Medicine and Treatment
ISSN : 2573-1092
Launched : 2016
JSM Brain Science
ISSN : 2573-1289
Launched : 2016
JSM Biomarkers
ISSN : 2578-3815
Launched : 2014
JSM Biology
ISSN : 2475-9392
Launched : 2016
Archives of Stem Cell and Research
ISSN : 2578-3580
Launched : 2014
Annals of Clinical and Medical Microbiology
ISSN : 2578-3629
Launched : 2014
JSM Pediatric Surgery
ISSN : 2578-3149
Launched : 2017
Journal of Memory Disorder and Rehabilitation
ISSN : 2578-319X
Launched : 2016
JSM Tropical Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2578-3165
Launched : 2016
JSM Head and Face Medicine
ISSN : 2578-3793
Launched : 2016
JSM Cardiothoracic Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1297
Launched : 2016
JSM Bone and Joint Diseases
ISSN : 2578-3351
Launched : 2017
JSM Bioavailability and Bioequivalence
ISSN : 2641-7812
Launched : 2017
JSM Atherosclerosis
ISSN : 2573-1270
Launched : 2016
Journal of Genitourinary Disorders
ISSN : 2641-7790
Launched : 2017
Journal of Fractures and Sprains
ISSN : 2578-3831
Launched : 2016
Journal of Autism and Epilepsy
ISSN : 2641-7774
Launched : 2016
Annals of Marine Biology and Research
ISSN : 2573-105X
Launched : 2014
JSM Health Education & Primary Health Care
ISSN : 2578-3777
Launched : 2016
JSM Communication Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3807
Launched : 2016
Annals of Musculoskeletal Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3599
Launched : 2016
Annals of Virology and Research
ISSN : 2573-1122
Launched : 2014
JSM Renal Medicine
ISSN : 2573-1637
Launched : 2016
Journal of Muscle Health
ISSN : 2578-3823
Launched : 2016
JSM Genetics and Genomics
ISSN : 2334-1823
Launched : 2013
JSM Anxiety and Depression
ISSN : 2475-9139
Launched : 2016
Clinical Journal of Heart Diseases
ISSN : 2641-7766
Launched : 2016
Annals of Medicinal Chemistry and Research
ISSN : 2378-9336
Launched : 2014
JSM Pain and Management
ISSN : 2578-3378
Launched : 2016
JSM Women's Health
ISSN : 2578-3696
Launched : 2016
Clinical Research in HIV or AIDS
ISSN : 2374-0094
Launched : 2013
Journal of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Obesity
ISSN : 2333-6692
Launched : 2013
Journal of Substance Abuse and Alcoholism
ISSN : 2373-9363
Launched : 2013
JSM Neurosurgery and Spine
ISSN : 2373-9479
Launched : 2013
Journal of Liver and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2379-0830
Launched : 2014
Journal of Drug Design and Research
ISSN : 2379-089X
Launched : 2014
JSM Clinical Oncology and Research
ISSN : 2373-938X
Launched : 2013
JSM Bioinformatics, Genomics and Proteomics
ISSN : 2576-1102
Launched : 2014
JSM Chemistry
ISSN : 2334-1831
Launched : 2013
Journal of Trauma and Care
ISSN : 2573-1246
Launched : 2014
JSM Surgical Oncology and Research
ISSN : 2578-3688
Launched : 2016
Annals of Food Processing and Preservation
ISSN : 2573-1033
Launched : 2016
Journal of Radiology and Radiation Therapy
ISSN : 2333-7095
Launched : 2013
JSM Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
ISSN : 2578-3572
Launched : 2016
Annals of Clinical Pathology
ISSN : 2373-9282
Launched : 2013
Annals of Cardiovascular Diseases
ISSN : 2641-7731
Launched : 2016
Journal of Behavior
ISSN : 2576-0076
Launched : 2016
Annals of Clinical and Experimental Metabolism
ISSN : 2572-2492
Launched : 2016
JSM Microbiology
ISSN : 2333-6455
Launched : 2013
Journal of Urology and Research
ISSN : 2379-951X
Launched : 2014
Journal of Family Medicine and Community Health
ISSN : 2379-0547
Launched : 2013
Annals of Pregnancy and Care
ISSN : 2578-336X
Launched : 2017
JSM Cell and Developmental Biology
ISSN : 2379-061X
Launched : 2013
Annals of Aquaculture and Research
ISSN : 2379-0881
Launched : 2014
Clinical Research in Pulmonology
ISSN : 2333-6625
Launched : 2013
Journal of Immunology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2333-6714
Launched : 2013
Annals of Forensic Research and Analysis
ISSN : 2378-9476
Launched : 2014
JSM Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
ISSN : 2333-7109
Launched : 2013
Annals of Breast Cancer Research
ISSN : 2641-7685
Launched : 2016
Annals of Gerontology and Geriatric Research
ISSN : 2378-9409
Launched : 2014
Journal of Sleep Medicine and Disorders
ISSN : 2379-0822
Launched : 2014
JSM Burns and Trauma
ISSN : 2475-9406
Launched : 2016
Chemical Engineering and Process Techniques
ISSN : 2333-6633
Launched : 2013
Annals of Clinical Cytology and Pathology
ISSN : 2475-9430
Launched : 2014
JSM Allergy and Asthma
ISSN : 2573-1254
Launched : 2016
Journal of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
ISSN : 2334-2307
Launched : 2013
Annals of Sports Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2379-0571
Launched : 2014
JSM Sexual Medicine
ISSN : 2578-3718
Launched : 2016
Annals of Vascular Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2378-9344
Launched : 2014
JSM Biotechnology and Biomedical Engineering
ISSN : 2333-7117
Launched : 2013
Journal of Hematology and Transfusion
ISSN : 2333-6684
Launched : 2013
JSM Environmental Science and Ecology
ISSN : 2333-7141
Launched : 2013
Journal of Cardiology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2333-6676
Launched : 2013
JSM Nanotechnology and Nanomedicine
ISSN : 2334-1815
Launched : 2013
Journal of Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders
ISSN : 2475-9473
Launched : 2016
JSM Ophthalmology
ISSN : 2333-6447
Launched : 2013
Journal of Pharmacology and Clinical Toxicology
ISSN : 2333-7079
Launched : 2013
Annals of Psychiatry and Mental Health
ISSN : 2374-0124
Launched : 2013
Medical Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
ISSN : 2333-6439
Launched : 2013
Annals of Pediatrics and Child Health
ISSN : 2373-9312
Launched : 2013
JSM Clinical Pharmaceutics
ISSN : 2379-9498
Launched : 2014
JSM Foot and Ankle
ISSN : 2475-9112
Launched : 2016
JSM Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementia
ISSN : 2378-9565
Launched : 2014
Journal of Addiction Medicine and Therapy
ISSN : 2333-665X
Launched : 2013
Journal of Veterinary Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2378-931X
Launched : 2013
Annals of Public Health and Research
ISSN : 2378-9328
Launched : 2014
Annals of Orthopedics and Rheumatology
ISSN : 2373-9290
Launched : 2013
Journal of Clinical Nephrology and Research
ISSN : 2379-0652
Launched : 2014
Annals of Community Medicine and Practice
ISSN : 2475-9465
Launched : 2014
Annals of Biometrics and Biostatistics
ISSN : 2374-0116
Launched : 2013
JSM Clinical Case Reports
ISSN : 2373-9819
Launched : 2013
Journal of Cancer Biology and Research
ISSN : 2373-9436
Launched : 2013
Journal of Surgery and Transplantation Science
ISSN : 2379-0911
Launched : 2013
Journal of Dermatology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2373-9371
Launched : 2013
JSM Gastroenterology and Hepatology
ISSN : 2373-9487
Launched : 2013
Annals of Nursing and Practice
ISSN : 2379-9501
Launched : 2014
JSM Dentistry
ISSN : 2333-7133
Launched : 2013
Author Information X