Etanercept (ETN) is a dimeric fusion protein comprised of the extracellular portion of the human soluble P75 tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) receptor and the Fc portion of human immunoglobulin G1. ETN binds TNF-α with high affinity, inhibiting TNF-α biologic activity. Because commercialization of ETN, it has been approved for the treatment of chronic inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) [1,2]. Previously published data has shown ETN to have no treatment benefit for patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) [3,4].

For AS, ETN reduces disease activity, functional disability, and joint damage [2,5,6]. However, with the increasing use of ETN and other TNF-α inhibitors, the number of new-onset CD diagnoses in AS patients has increased [7-11], even though such a diagnosis is still relatively rare. It is possible that CD is an immune mediated injury induced by ETN, but no causative link has been definitively established. Herein, we report a case of CD due to ETN therapy of an AS patient.

In January 2013, a 34-year-old man with a 9-year history of unregulated AS was treated with subcutaneous injections of ETN (25 mg twice a week) because of high disease activity scores. He responded well to ETN, and the disease was well-controlled. The patient had no personal or familial history of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). In January 2020 the patient underwent total hip replacement arthroplasty and had an excellent recovery with no complications.

In February 2021, the patient was hospitalized with 1 month of abdominal pain, diarrhea, fever, and weight loss. Blood analysis found elevated inflammatory markers; leukocytosis (9.3 × 109 /L, with 76.80% neutrophilic granulocytes), C-reactive protein (CRP) 28.76 mg/L, and an erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) of 39 mm/h.

He underwent a colonoscopy that revealed deep ulceration of the terminal ileum as well as scattered superficial ulcers extending from the cecum to the sigmoid colon (Figure 1). Histological analysis identified signs of severe acute and chronic colitis with non-caseating granulomatous ulcerations, as well as polymorphonuclear leukocytes, and crypt destruction (Figure 2). Infectious etiology was ruled out. Based on the clinical presentation, endoscopic and histological findings, as well as the absence of infection, a diagnosis of CD phenotype A2L3B1 (Vienna classification) was made. ETN was stopped and the patient was successfully treated with 300 mg infliximab (IFX). He went into clinical AS remission after 3 IFX treatments. Currently, AS and CD are in remission.

With extensive use of TNF-α inhibitors, adverse events related to the inhibitors have been reported, including paradoxical adverse events (PAEs). PAEs are defined as the occurrence during biological agent therapy of chronic immunemediated disorders such as RA, JIA, AS, and PsA. These are pathological conditions that usually respond to biological agent therapy but are surprising predominant in response to TNF-α inhibitors [12,13]. PAEs incidents include new onset psoriasis or hidradenitis suppurativa, development of aseptic granulomatous disease, and the appearance of uveitis or IBD [13-15].

Currently, five TNF-α inhibitors are available for AS clinical use; adalimumab (ADA) and golimumab (GLM) are fully human monoclonal antibodies, IFX is a chimeric human-murine monoclonal antibody, certolizumab pegol (CZP) is a humanized Fab fragment conjugated to polyethylene glycol, and ETN. Although other anti-TNF-α agents may increase the risk of IBD in patients with AS, ETN is reported to be of greatest risk [15], which may be attributed to structural and functional differences among TNF-α inhibitors [16]. Joshua Korzenik et al., conducted a population-based cohort study in Denmark of 17,018 autoimmune disease patients who received anti-TNF-α therapy. The majority of the patients received IFX, ETN, and ADA. A cohort of 63,308 individuals without exposure was also examined. Patients treated with ETN had an increased risk for CD and ulcerative colitis (UC) while receiving treatment, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 2.0 [95% CI:1.4−2.8]and 2.0 [95% CI:1.5−2.8], respectively [10]. In contrast, another study found no significant difference between three anti-TNF agents (ETN, INF, ADA) with regard to the risk of IBD onset in AS patients [17].

Because chronic systemic, immune-mediated inflammatory disorders are complex diseases involving multiple immune factors and pathways, the occurrence of PAEs is not surprising. The mechanisms underlying these PAEs remain unknown. TNF-α inhibitors may predispose to PAEs by changing the cytokine milieu, creating a conducive immune environment that drives specific known pathological pathways or possibly new or unknown pathways [12]. ETN, and other TNF-α blockers, differ in their mechanisms of action. Indeed, ETN does not fix complement and does not activate antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) or complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC), which would induce cellular apoptosis within the gastrointestinal mucosa [18]. Monoclonal antibody TNF-α blockers produce profound TNF-α inhibition, whereas ETN partially preserves the production of the cytokine. ETN is associated with IFN-α production, and this process contributes to granuloma formation, while monoclonal antibody TNF-α blockers inhibit IFN-γ release [12,19]. These differences explain why ETN has limited CD efficacy.

Herein, we report a case of new onset CD after 8 years of ETN therapy of an AS patient. During the period of ETN treatment, new onset CD likely resulted from either extra-articular manifestations (EAMs) of AS [20], or a TNF-α inhibitor-related PAE. Other studies have also demonstrated an increased risk for IBD among patients with AS who were not treated with TNF-α inhibitors. Although most studies reported the prevalence of clinically diagnosed IBD in AS patients of less than 10%, approximately 60% of those patients did exhibit intestinal inflammation based on endoscopic or histological examination of intestinal tissue [20-24]. Furthermore, it is estimated that 5%~20% of patients develop CD within 5 years [25,26]. The prevalence of AS is 5% to 10% among IBD patients who are HLAB27-positive [27]. Temporal associations between ETN exposure and the occurrence of CD have been reported to range from 5 months to 10 years [8]. As a consequence, there is no uniform recommendation for appropriate timing of endoscopy for AS patients, although careful follow up within the first 2 years of therapy, to assess IBD development, has been suggested. In this report, we consider the occurrence of CD in this patient to be a TNF-α inhibitor-related PAE based on; the lack of personal or family history of CD, an asymptomatic bowel for 9 years prior to ETN treatment, and the absence of other medication during treatment with ETN. As such, there was a temporal relationship between new-onset CD and ETN therapy, which resolved following discontinuation of ETN and treatment with IFX.

There have been few published studies of IBD among patients with AS. Serum CRP and fecal calprotectin levels can be used to monitor IBD [28-30]. In the Netherlands, the use of the Dudley Inflammatory Bowel Symptom Questionnaire (DISQ) in patients with spondyloarthritis has been validated and can be a useful tool for disease monitoring. However, the questionnaire needs to be validated in other populations [31]. A family history of IBD, HLA-B27 positivity, and TNF-α inhibitor use are significant predictive factors for the development of IBD in AS. Patients suffering from AS who have family or personal history of IBD, or are HLA-B27 positive, should not undergo ETN treatment [32]. Endoscopy is recommended prior to initiation of TNF-α inhibitor treatment. IBD should be taken into consideration when ETN treatment of the patient results in clinical symptoms such as abdominal pain, chronic diarrhea, rectal bleeding, perianal disease, weight loss, malnutrition, and fever.

To summarize, apart from efficacy, TNF-α inhibitor-related PAEs need to be considered as a possible outcome of treatment for chronic immune-mediated disorders. Patients receiving ETN should be carefully evaluated for family or personal history of IBD. Colonoscopy should be completed before ETN treatment of AS patients and regularly thereafter in those with risk factors. In most reported cases, if the cause of CD is suspected to be ETN, ETN must be stopped immediately, switching to therapy with a monoclonal TNF-α antibody [12,33].

Author Contributions

Zhengyang Li and Miao Jiang: research concept, data analysis and interpretation, drafting of the manuscript; Haiyan Wang: participant enrolment, drafting of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

This work was supported by Health Commission of Jinshan District, Shanghai, China (No. JSKJ-KTMS-2019-01), Youth Research Fundation of Jinshan hospital of Fudan university (No. JYQN-JC-2021-01) and Reserve discipline construction of Jinshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University (No. HBXK-2021-2).

1. Shepherd J, Cooper K, Harris P, Picot J, Rose M. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of abatacept, adalimumab, etanercept and tocilizumab for treating juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2016; 20: 1-222.
2. Senabre-Gallego JM, Santos-Ramirez C, Santos-Soler G, Salas-Heredia E, Sanchez-Barrioluengo M, Barber X, Rosas J. Long-term safety and efficacy of etanercept in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2013; 7: 961-72.
3. Sandborn WJ, Hanauer SB, Katz S, Safdi M, Wolf DG, Baerg RD, Tremaine WJ, Johnson T, Diehl NN, Zinsmeister AR. Etanercept for active Crohn’s disease: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Gastroenterology. 2001; 121: 1088-94.
4. van den Brande J, Hommes DW, Peppelenbosch MP. Infliximab induced T lymphocyte apoptosis in Crohn’s disease. J Rheumatol Suppl. 2005; 74: 26-30.
5. Brandt J, Khariouzov A, Listing J, Haibel H, Sorensen H, Grassnickel L, et al. Six-month results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of etanercept treatment in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Rheum. 2003; 48: 1667-75.
6. Davis JJ, Van Der Heijde D, Braun J, Dougados M, Cush J, Clegg DO, et al. Recombinant human tumor necrosis factor receptor (etanercept) for treating ankylosing spondylitis: a randomized, controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2003; 48: 3230-6.
7. Oh J, Arkfeld DG, Horwitz DA. Development of Crohn’s disease in a patient taking etanercept. J Rheumatol. 2005; 32: 752-3.
8. Tolu S, Rezvani A, Hindioglu N, Calkin KM. Etanercept-induced Crohn’s disease in ankylosing spondylitis: a case report and review of the literature. Rheumatol Int. 2018; 38: 2157-2162.
9. Wronski J, Fiedor P, Gluszko P. Adverse events in patients with ankylosing spondylitis treated with TNF inhibitors: a cross-sectional study. Int J Clin Pharm. 2019; 41: 864-871.
10. Korzenik J, Larsen MD, Nielsen J, Kjeldsen J, Norgard BM. Increased risk of developing Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis in 17 018 patients while under treatment with anti-TNFalpha agents, particularly etanercept, for autoimmune diseases other than inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2019; 50: 289-294.
11. Uskudar CD, Uskudar TH, Temel T, Erturk A, Kahraman O, Korkmaz C. Do AntiTNF Agents Increase the Risk of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Evolution in Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis? Real Life Data. J Natl Med Assoc. 2019; 111: 262-269.
12. Toussirot E, Aubin F. Paradoxical reactions under TNF-alpha blocking agents and other biological agents given for chronic immune-mediated diseases: an analytical and comprehensive overview. RMD Open. 2016; 2: e000239.
13. Fouache D, Goeb V, Massy-Guillemant N, Avenel G, Bacquet-Deschryver H, Kozyreff-Meurice M, et al. Paradoxical adverse events of anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy for spondyloarthropathies: a retrospective study. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2009; 48: 761-4.
14. Daien CI, Monnier A, Claudepierre P, Constantin A, Eschard JP, Houvenagel E, et al. Sarcoid-like granulomatosis in patients treated with tumor necrosis factor blockers: 10 cases. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2009; 48: 883-6.
15. Wendling D, Prati C. Paradoxical effects of anti-TNF-alpha agents in inflammatory diseases. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2014; 10: 159-69.
16. Marotte H, Cimaz R. Etanercept - TNF receptor and IgG1 Fc fusion protein: is it different from other TNF blockers? Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2014; 14: 569-72.
17. Braun J, Baraliakos X, Listing J, Davis J, van der Heijde D, Haibel H, et al. Differences in the incidence of flares or new onset of inflammatory bowel diseases in patients with ankylosing spondylitis exposed to therapy with antitumor necrosis factor alpha agents. Arthritis Rheum. 2007; 57: 639-47.
18. Furst DE, Wallis R, Broder M, Beenhouwer DO. Tumor necrosis factor antagonists: different kinetics and/or mechanisms of action may explain differences in the risk for developing granulomatous infection. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2006; 36: 159-67.
19. Toussirot E, Houvenagel E, Goeb V, Fouache D, Martin A, Le Dantec P, et al. Development of inflammatory bowel disease during anti-TNF-alpha therapy for inflammatory rheumatic disease: a nationwide series. Joint Bone Spine. 2012; 79: 457-63.
20. Rosenbaum J, Chandran V. Management of comorbidities in ankylosing spondylitis. Am J Med Sci. 2012; 343: 364-6.
21. Bengtsson K, Forsblad-d’Elia H, Deminger A, Klingberg E, Dehlin M, Exarchou S, et al. Incidence of extra-articular manifestations in ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis and undifferentiated spondyloarthritis: results from a national register-based cohort study. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2021; 60: 2725- 2734.
22. de Winter JJ, van Mens LJ, van der Heijde D, Landewe R, Baeten DL. Prevalence of peripheral and extra-articular disease in ankylosing spondylitis versus nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis: a meta-analysis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2016; 18:196.
23. Stolwijk C, van Tubergen A, Castillo-Ortiz JD, Boonen A. Prevalence of extraarticular manifestations in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015; 74: 65-73.
24. Rudwaleit M, Baeten D. Ankylosing spondylitis and bowel disease. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2006; 20: 451-71.
25. De Vos M, Mielants H, Cuvelier C, Elewaut A, Veys E. Long-term evolution of gut inflammation in patients with spondyloarthropathy. Gastroenterology. 1996; 110: 1696-703.
26. Gilis E, Mortier C, Venken K, Debusschere K, Vereecke L, Elewaut D. The Role of the Microbiome in Gut and Joint Inflammation in Psoriatic Arthritis and Spondyloarthritis. J Rheumatol Suppl. 2018; 94: 36-39.
27. Atay K, Eyvazov H, Bozcan S, Eskazan T, Demir N, Hatemi I, et al. The effect of concomitant ankylosing spondylitis on long-term outcome of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2019; 30: 599-604.
28. Kehl AS, Learch TJ, Li D, McGovern D, Weisman MH. Relationship between the gut and the spine: a pilot study of first-degree relatives of patients with ankylosing spondylitis. RMD Open. 2017; 3: e000437.
29. Klingberg E, Strid H, Stahl A, Deminger A, Carlsten H, Ohman L, et al. A longitudinal study of fecal calprotectin and the development of inflammatory bowel disease in ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2017; 19: 21.
30. Fauny M, D’Amico F, Bonovas S, Netter P, Danese S, Loeuille D, et al. Faecal Calprotectin for the Diagnosis of Bowel Inflammation in Patients With Rheumatological Diseases: A Systematic Review. J Crohns Colitis. 2020; 14: 688-693.
31. Stebbings S, Jenks K, Treharne GJ, Garcia JA, Schultz M, Highton J, et al. Validation of the Dudley Inflammatory Bowel Symptom Questionnaire for the assessment of bowel symptoms in axial SpA: prevalence of clinically relevant bowel symptoms and association with disease activity. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2012; 51: 858-65.
32. Wendling D, Guillot X, Prati C, Miceli-Richard C, Molto A, Lories R, et al. Effect of Gut Involvement in Patients with High Probability of Early Spondyloarthritis: Data from the DESIR Cohort. J Rheumatol. 2020; 47: 349-353.
33. O’Toole A, Lucci M, Korzenik J. Inflammatory Bowel Disease Provoked by Etanercept: Report of
34. 443 Possible Cases Combined from an IBD Referral Center and the FDA. Dig Dis Sci. 2016; 61: 1772-4.

We present the case of a young male patient who developed Crohn’s disease (CD) following Etanercept (ETN) treatment for ankylosing spondylitis (AS). After 1 month of abdominal pain, diarrhea, fever, and weight loss ETN treatment was stopped and treatment with infliximab (IFX) begun. The patient responded well and was discharged from the hospital. New-onset CD is an immune-mediated injury induced by ETN treatment. However, a definitive causative link between ETN and CD has not yet been established.

Ankylosing spondylitis; Etanercept; Crohn’s disease

Wang H, Miao J, Li Z (2023) Etanercept-Induced Crohn’s Disease in Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Case Report. JSM Gastroenterol Hepatol 10(1): 1116.