Loading

Journal of Cancer Biology and Research

Expression Analysis of COX2 in Patients Suffering from Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Research Article | Open Access

  • 1. Department of Histopathology, Khyber Medical University, Pakistan
  • 2. Department of Pathology, Rehman Medical Institute, Pakistan
  • 3. Department of Pathology, Dallah Hospital Laboratory, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
  • 4. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Aga Khan University Hospital, Pakistan
  • 5. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Khyber Medical University, Pakistan
+ Show More - Show Less
Corresponding Authors
Shahida Tasneem, Department of Histopathology, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Khyber Medical University, Peshawar, Pakistan, Tel: 92-300-9340779,
Absract

Objective: To investigate the expression of COX-2 gene in patients suffering from esophageal squamous cell carcinoma 
Study design: Descriptive Place and duration of study: Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Khyber Medical University 
Patients and methods: A total of 69 patients, of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), comprising of Pakistanis and Afghans were enrolled. Various  risk factors associated with ESCC were recorded. Immunohistochemical (IHC) expression of COX-2 was determined in normal esophageal mucosa, Carcinoma in  situ (CIS) and invasive ESCC. Differences of mean were computed with ANOVA test followed by Post Hoc test. Patients were categorized as positive with high  expression or negative with low to nil expression.
Results: Annova test showed large differences in expression of COX-2 in normal healthy mucosa compared to CIS tissue and ESCC with the mean  difference of -9.529 and -7.370 respectively, p-value <.05 at 95% confidence interval (CI). No significant difference was noticed in expression of COX-2 in  CIS compared to ESCC with the p-value >.05 at 95% CI. Mean age at diagnosis was 55 years. Out of 69 patients of ESCC in our sample, 46 (67%) were  users of Naswar.
Conclusion: The cohort, 23-85 years shows statistically significant difference in expression of COX-2 gene in ESCC and CIS tissue sample compared to  normal healthy mucosa. Over-expression of COX-2 is positively associated with ESCC

Citation

Tasneem S, Sarwar MT, Bashir MR, Hussain H, Ahmed J, et al. (2018) Expression Analysis of COX-2 in Patients Suffering from Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. J Cancer Biol Res 6(2): 1116.

Keywords

 Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, COX-2, Immunohistochemistry, Naswa

ABBREVIATIONS

EC: Esophageal Carcinoma; ESCC: Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma; CIS: Carcinoma in Situ; COX-2: Cyclooxygenase 2; EAC: Esophageal Adenocarcinoma; US: United States; AJCC: American Joint Committee on Cancer; UICC: Union for International Cancer Control; KP: Khyber Pakhtunkhwa; pTNM: Pathological Staging

INTRODUCTION

Esophageal cancer (EC) is being a global health concern, ranks eighth among the most common types of cancers and is the 6th most fatal disease worldwide [1-3]. Though significant advances have been made in the treatment of ESCC, it is still unresponsive to the treatment strategy and has an adverse prognosis, with a five year survival rate of only 10-15% [2,4]. EC show marked geographical, ethnic, and gender variation. The most common histological subtype of EC in the high incidence regions such as the greater Iran is ESCC [5,6]. While in low incidence areas like the US, Esophageal Adenocarcinoma is the most common subtype [7,8]. In China the incidence of EC accounts for half of the cases all over the world [9]. The male to female ratio of EC mortality is 2:1 [10].

In Pakistan, EC is quite common. Highest incidence zone of EC in Pakistan is the Baluchistan plateau in the Northwest of Pakistan where it is the most common malignancy in both males and females [5,9,11]. In Karachi, the largest city of Pakistan, EC is ranked 7th and 6th most common cancer in men and women respectively. The predominant type in Karachi, Pakistan is ESCC, in contrast, adenocarcinoma is the most common variety in Western countries [1]. The predominance of ESCC in Karachi needs to be viewed in the context that the large number of people

moved to Karachi from Baluchistan and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) [9]. According to the statistics provided by the Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Center (SKMCH and RC), cancer of the esophagus is almost 1.9 percent of the total malignancies in Pakistan. Majority of patients who were treated in this tertiary care facility belonged to Punjab and KP [1].

Major risk factors of EC include poor socioeconomic status, use of tobacco, naswar (Snuff or nass), use of alcohol, hot beverages and infrequent consumption of raw fruits and vegetables [3]. Globally, different types of smokeless tobacco like chewing tobacco, wet snuff and dried snuff are used. Fire and air cured tobacco is also used in the form of moist snuff. (It is also called snus). All these are used by inserting the substance inside the lips between the buccal mucosa and gingiva [12,13]. Chewing nass, a smokeless tobacco product, is a mixture of tobacco lime, oil, flavoring and coloring reagent and is used in central parts of Asia and India [12,14]. An addictive habit like oral and nasal use of naswar is a common practice in Pushtoons of Baluchistan and KP, which many studies have found to be a risk factor of EC [9,13].

Precise pathogenic factors and processes leading to EC are still not clear. Molecular studies of ESCC have revealed that genetic alterations such as mutation of Tp53, loss of p16 and an increased expression of CDKN2A play a role in causing ESCC [15].

The classification of College of American Pathologist classifies ESCC in different grades; well, moderately and poorly differentiated carcinoma. The Pathological staging (pTNM) is done according to American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC)/ Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) [16], from stage 0- stage IV, depending upon the status of the primary tumor (T), lymph node invasion (N), metastasis (M), grade and location of the tumor.

Cyclooxygenase system plays a crucial role in the progression of esophageal carcinoma from esophagitis to dysplasia (mild, moderate and high) and invasive carcinoma (ESCC) [17]. High grade dysplasia is called carcinoma in-situ (CIS). Two isoforms of cyclooxygenase system are characterized as cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2). COX-1 is constitutively expressed in most tissues and mediates the synthesis of prostaglandins to control normal physiological functions. COX-2 is an enzyme that mediates the synthesis of prostaglandins and thromboxanes which are the regulators of biological processes like inflammation, proliferation, angiogenesis, tumor growth and transformation [15,17]. Over expression of COX-2 has been reported in many premalignant and malignant tissues but its mRNA and proteins were either absent orat a low level in ordinary tissues. Overexpression of COX-2 was associated with aggressive nature of the tumor and showed reduced survival in many studies [17-19]. A study involving Chinese patients reports that the levels of COX-2 are sufficiently high in ESCC. This raises the possibility that selective inhibitors of COX-2 may be useful in the prevention of this ailment [20,21]. Overexpression of COX-2 was also seen in other epithelial malignancies especially in the gastrointestinal tract like stomach & colon and other viscera e.g. lung, bladder and head & neck [17,18] Prognostic significance is also mentioned in most of the tissues.

This study seeks to investigate the risk factors of EC in high risk population of Pakistan and neighboring Afghanistan. Expression of COX-2 in ESCC is also analyzed and its correlation with clinic-pathological parameters investigated, which has not been explored in depth so far.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study has been approved by the ethical review committee of the Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Khyber Medical University. A total of 69 cases were collected from the cardiothoracic surgical units of Lady Reading Hospital (LRH) Peshawar and Rehman Medical Institute (RMI) Peshawar from March 2013 to March 2015. The Patients included 37 males and 32 females with age of 55.3 ± 13.73 years. All the patients who had been diagnosed with ESCC on endoscopic biopsy and had undergone esophageal resection for malignancy were included in the study. Patients who had, history of EC other than ESCC, had irresistible tumors and those who already had received chemotherapy or radiotherapy were excluded from the study. The patients included in the study were interviewed, after obtaining consent to seek information regarding patient’s age, sex, occupation, address, education and personal habits like use of naswar, smoking, using alcohol, intake of hot beverages, raw fruits, vegetables and the level of proteins in typical diet. For the purpose of staging, CT scan reports of the patients enrolled in the study were collected. In the resected esophagus, site and size of the tumor was recorded. Surgical specimens were collected in 10% buffered formalin. Specimens were grossed and cut into sections which included macroscopically normal esophageal mucosa (n=41) (at a distance of around 5 cm from the tumor), adjacent dysplastic mucosa (n=19), tumor tissue (n=69) and any lymph nodes present in the resected specimen. Tissue processing was done for further histopathological evaluation with Haematoxylin and Eosin (H & E) staining to determine the type of tumor, grade, depth of invasion and relevant metastatic lesion in the retrieved lymph nodes, to stage the disease according to CAP protocol 2016 (AJCC staging) [16]. The tumor tissue, dysplastic tissue and normal healthy mucosawere further processed for immunohistochemical staining with a COX-2 biomarker. Clinicohistopathological results were correlated with COX-2 immunoexpression profile.

Immuno-staining with COX-2 antibody

Immunohistochemical analysis was performed on representative blocks of each ESCC patient including the normal mucosa, dysplastic mucosa (where available) and corresponding tumor tissueshowing maximum cellularity. 3-4μm thick sections of formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissue were placed on salinized slides. The sections were de-paraffinized with xylene and rehydrated with descending series of alcohol and subsequently washed with distilled water. For antigen retrieval, deparaffinized slides were incubated in citrate buffer with pH 6 in a microwave for 20 minutes. Endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked by placing 3% Hydrogen peroxidase on the slides after rinsing the slides with phosphate buffer saline (PBS). Sections were then incubated with commercially available mouse monoclonal antibody to COX-2, clone CX 294 (Dako, Denmark) for 30 minutes, and then treated with secondary antibody i.e. Flex HRP. After further washing, Diaminobenzidine Tetrachloride Immunohistochemical analysis was performed on representative blocks of each ESCC patient including the normal mucosa, dysplastic mucosa (where available) and corresponding tumor tissueshowing maximum cellularity. 3-4μm thick sections of formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissue were placed on salinized slides. The sections were de-paraffinized with xylene and rehydrated with descending series of alcohol and subsequently washed with distilled water. For antigen retrieval, deparaffinized slides were incubated in citrate buffer with pH 6 in a microwave for 20 minutes. Endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked by placing 3% Hydrogen peroxidase on the slides after rinsing the slides with phosphate buffer saline (PBS). Sections were then incubated with commercially available mouse monoclonal antibody to COX-2, clone CX 294 (Dako, Denmark) for 30 minutes, and then treated with secondary antibody i.e. Flex HRP. After further washing, Diaminobenzidine Tetrachloride (DAB) chromogen was added. Slides were counterstained with Haematoxylin and subsequently washed. The immunostained slides were assessed by two Histopathalogists independently. In case of conflicting opinion of the two histopathologist, the cases were reviewed again by a third histopathologist. Appropriate positive control (Smooth muscles of the same tissue) and negative control of the normal healthy mucosa of the same patient (where available) were run with each batch.

Scoring of tumor tissue (ESCC), corresponding CIS and normal healthy mucosa

In this study samples were scored semi-quantitatively by light microscopy with 40x magnification, considering the proportion of stained cells and intensity of staining. In all the cases, 5 High Power Fields of representative areas of neoplastic squamous epithelial cells were selected and a minimum of 800- 900 cells were counted manually (Chakhachiro et al., 2013). Proportion of stained cells were scored as 0 (0%), 1(1%), 2(1- 10%), 3(11-33%) 4(34-66%), 5(>66%) respectively (Majidi et al., 2014) [22]. Staining intensity was assessed on a scale 0 (negative), 1+ (weak), 2+ (moderate) and 3+ (strong) as reported in other studies [15,18,23]. Immunohistochemical total score was determined with the product of intensity and proportion score. This histoscore has a possible range of 0-15. As in the study of Binghua Li, in this study median was used as the cutoff value for classification of patients in to low and high expression [24]. Median of the score was generated independently in tumor tissue, CIS and normal corresponding tissue using SPSS version 20. The histoscore above cutoff value of 6 was categorized as strong expression and equal to or below it as low expression or as negative. The ESCC was compared independently with the corresponding CIS and normal tissue.

Statistical analysis

SPSS version 20 was used for data entry and statistical analysis. To generate the confidence interval of ESCC, corresponding dysplastic (CIS) and normal healthy mucosa with the biomarker COX-2 expression, ANOVA Test was applied. Pearson’s Chi-square test was applied to assess the correlation of the clinicopathological variables like age, Pakistani and Afghan population, unhealthy habits i.e smoking and using naswar, intake of hot beverages and dietary habits, tumor size, pathologic grade, depth of invasion, lymph node metastasis and (AJCC) staging of the disease with COX-2 immunoexpression. Differences were found to bestatistically significant with ap-value of <0.05 as reported in other studies [18].

 

RESULTS

Clinicopathological and immunohistochemical analysis was carried out in ESCC patients to evaluate impact of risk factors in ESCC and COX-2 expression in different stages of cancer development: normal squamous epithelium of 40 patients, dysplastic tissue (CIS) of 19 patients and invasive ESCC of 69 corresponding patients. Out of 69 patients of ESCC in our sample, 46 (67%) were users of Naswar. Moreover it was bit more in Afghan patients (Figure 1). Out of 69 patients, 67% were Pakistani and 33% were Afghans. Mean age of patients at the time of diagnosis was 55.3 + 13.73 years (range 26-85years), 41% were < 50 years of age and 59% were more than 50 years of age, consisting of 54% males and 46% females (1.7:1). In this study we find that dysphagiais the most common complaint in all the patients both for solid and liquid food. Low socioeconomic status was observed in 99% of the patients. All the patients belonged to labor class and were mostly consuming vegetables and low protein diet regularly. Rest of the risk factors like smoking, taking alcohol and consumption of hot beverages was studied which showed no significant correlation with clincopathological parameters

In this study out of 69 ESCC patients, strong COX-2 expression was observed in 67% of the tumor tissue of ESCC patients whereas negative COX-2 expression was observed in 33% of patients including both the 80% true negative and 20% weakly positive (Figure 2). In neoplastic epithelial cells immunostaining was predominant in the peripheral region of the tumor nest compared to the inner cells. High grade dysplasia was found only in 28% of patients; macroscopically the tissue CIS turned out to be mostly tumor which was expected. Among these, 79% showed intense staining with COX-2 in upper 2/3rd of dysplastic epithelium while the basal layer was faintly stained (Figure 3A, Figure 3B) and negative expression was observed in 21% of the patients.The high expression of COX-2 in CIS tissue (n=19/69) may be due to relatively small no. of paired samples of dysplastic change (CIS) compared to total no. of samples of ESCC tissue. Normal healthy mucosa in 40 (100%) of these patients was negative for COX-2 expression.

The correlation of COX-2 expression in normal healthy mucosa, corresponding CIS and ESCC was generated with Annova test, the comparison of mean difference, significant p-Value and confidence interval among all the three tissues is as shown in Table 2A and Table 2B. The COX-2 Immuno expression in normal healthy mucosa compared to CIS tissue was significantly different with the mean difference of -9.529, p-value .000 and 95% (-9.38 to -5.36) confidence interval (CI). Same significant differences were observed when normal was compared with the ESCC with the mean difference of -7.370, p-value .000, 95% CI of (-9.05 -5.69). In comparison of CIS with ESCC, the mean difference was -2.159 with the p-value .128and CI (-4.6to -4.78), the difference is insignificant (Table 2B).

Strong immunoexpression of COX-2 was observed in 71% of patients in the age group < 50 years as compared to 63% of the patients in the age group >50 years. However with the p-value > 0.05, the result is statistically insignificant. High expression of COX-2 was seen in 54% user of naswar and 61% among non-users though the result is statistically insignificant (Table 3). The tumor size of 1-3 cm, 3-7 cm and >7 cm showed strong immunoexpression in 73%, 63% and 69% of the patients respectively with insignificant p-value. No significant correlation was noted with varying grades of disease, depth of invasion and lymph node metastasis. Mild increase in expression of COX-2 is observed with increasing stage of the disease albeit insignificant (Table 3).

 

DISCUSSION

ESCC is one of most lethal malignancies with dismal prognosis. Studies are required to develop the specific marker for targeted personalized therapy of ESCC. Increased prostanoid activity is a well-recognized characteristic of gastrointestinal, breast and lung malignancies [22,25]. COX-2 catalyzes the conversion of free arachidonic acid into prostaglandin H2 , the precursor of other prostaglandins and thromboxanes and regulates the cellular processes including angiogenesis, proliferation and apoptosis. COX-2 enzyme is inducible gene in inflammation and carcinogenesis. However expression of COX-2 has not been explored in ESCC and its association with clinicopathological parameter is still not elucidated. Very few relevant studies have investigated the biomarker expression of COX-2 in ESSC. These have reported increased expression of COX-2 in ESCC, deduced through immuno-histochemical staining [26]. Study of the expression pattern of COX-2 in ESCC is important to evaluate the role of this gene in the development of cancer and to determine whether COX-2 selective inhibitors would be beneficial for the targeted therapy.

We conducted this study to observe the impact of risk factors in ESCC and to analyze the expression of COX-2 biomarker in ESCC. .

Mean age at the time of diagnosis in this study was 55 years while a study from Scotland showed median age at the time of diagnosis as 72 years [27]. This indicates the incidence of ESCC in younger patients for the sample used in this study, may have an association with the worse prognosis [27]. Samples from large number of patients of ESCC were collected in 2 years from two tertiary care hospitals of KP province. Those with irresectable esophagus at advanced stage of the disease, EC other than ESCC and those who had neoadjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy were excluded. Though no tumor registry exists in Pakistan, we observed high prevalence of ESCC both in local Pushtoons of KP

and Afghans in relation to various demographic characteristics. At other places within Pakistan even higher the prevalence has been reported, only Karachi accounts for 5% of all the cancers in Pakistan. Quetta is a city in Northern Pakistan where ESCC is the third most common cancer in men. It is noteworthy that the province of KP and the Quetta city are in close proximity to Afghanistan and Iran where this disease is endemic [27].

In our study all male patients were either farmers or laborers while female patients were mostly housewives. Most of the patients are from socioeconomic deprived areas, the rural areas of KP and Afghanistan. Other studies have also reported that ESCC is higher in deprived localities [8].

There is limited published data that have investigated the impact of naswar in ESCC in Pakistan especially in KP [28]. This study highlights the frequency of naswar in high risk population of KP. Majority of our patients use tobacco in different forms like dipping snuff (naswar) as pinch which is placed under the lip between the gingival and buccal mucosa, snuff inhalation and eating naswar. All naswar users were using naswar as pinch, 8-10 times/day for a long period of time since the age of adolescence. Out of 69 patients of ESCC in our sample, 46 (67%) were users of Naswar (Table 1), which is consistent with other published data [12-29]. Although use of naswar was greater in patients suffering from ESCC but we could not identify it as risk factor because normal individuals (non ESCC) were not included in this study for comparison. Major carcinogenic constituents of naswar/snuff are N-nitrosamine and nitrites. Others include cadmium, lead, polonium, formaldehyde and phenolic compounds [13,14]. ESCC may have an association with intensity, duaration and cumulative amount of snuff use. The concentrations of N-nitrosamine and nitrites are increased in fire and air cured processing of loose tobacco leaf. Method of processing of snuff has not been elucidated in this study. Our study deduced that naswar use by the patients in KP and Afghan may be a major risk factor of ESCC.

Drinking alcohol is typically not practiced in this part of the world, which is one of the major risk factor in other high risk regions. Almost all of the patients in our study were primarily vegetarians and were not taking hot beverages or spicy food, rather they consumed animal protein, or fruits occasionally.

This finding is different from the results reported in relevant literature, showing a low intake of vegetables (fiber diet) as high risk factor for ESCC [1].

The concept of cancerization in epithelial malignancies was first proposed by Slaughter in 1953. It was proposed that genetic alteration in the progenitor/stem cells results in monoclonal unit of altered cells in the field of lesion. Expansion of these genetically transformed cells acquires further alteration in the contiguous field replacing the normal mucosa in the preneoplastic (dysplastic) lesion field [30,31]. COX-2 enzyme over expression has been noticed in the early preneoplastic field of ESCC [32].

We analyzed precise pattern of COX-2 expression in normal esophageal mucosa, dysplasia, CIS (High grade dysplasia) and invasive ESCC, its correlation with clinicopathological parameters was also investigated. Staining pattern of COX-2 in CIS (Figure 3A & B) and ESCC (Figure 4A & B) was both cytoplasmic and membranous. In some of the cases, staining was seen in the cells at the periphery of the tumor cell nests, suggesting that COX-2 may be associated with the proliferation of the tumor cells. In some studies, it was revealed that a high expression of COX-2 was associated with tumor proliferation and carcinogenesis [26,33].

This study using intensity of staining and percentage of stained tumor cells in all the tissue types, finds variance of expression in ESCC, CIS and normal healthy mucosa (Table 2). Correlation of gene expression distinguished clearly the tumor and CIS tissue from the non tumor tissue. Strong COX-2 over expression was found in 79% of dysplastic mucosa (CIS) and 67% of corresponding invasive ESCC patients compared to negative expression in normal esophageal mucosa (Figure 2). This suggests that induction of COX-2 may have a pivotal role in the progression of epithelial cell transformation to dysplastic epithelium and invasive cancer in esophageal mucosa. Our finding supports the study of Naoki Hashimoto and Zimmermann [20,21], who also noticed immunoexpression of COX-2 in ESCC in 91% of the cases and suggested that COX-2 derived prostaglandin plays an important role in the regulation and proliferation of tumor cells [20,21]. Similarly in the study of Cui Y COX-2 immunoexpression was noticed in 67% of the ESCC patients. However the study finds that COX-2 expression was significantly associated with lymph node metastasis and a poorly differentiated degree [34]. While in another study of Hu et al. [18], strong expression was found in 3/4th of the ESCC individuals. These values are quite high than our finding. The variance in the findings could be due to a different sample size and a different ethnicity background of the patients. Out of 46 positive cases of COX-2 expression, corresponding dysplastic epithelium was seen in 19 patients. Out of these 19 patients, in 80% the upper 2/3rd showed 3+ intensity of staining (Figure 1A). These results of dysplastic epithelium are different from other studies, in which mostly basal cells or all the dysplastic cells show COX-2 over expression [22]. Another interesting finding that high grade dysplasia/carcinoma in-situ (CIS) associated with invasive tumor was intensely stained in 80% of the dysplastic epithelium. This suggests that COX-2 over expression can also be detected in the early stage of the disease. COX-2 over expression was also noticed in dysplastic and ESCC tissue in the study of Yu HP 2004 [32] compared to normal mucosa, supports the view of preneoplastic field of cancerization introduced by slaughter in 1953. These results are concordant with the studies carried out by Zhi et al. (2005) [26], and Majidi et al., (2014) [22]. We deduced from our findings that COX2 expression plays an important role in the progression of the disease and could help the patients to be diagnosed and treated in the early stages of the disease.

A large number of patients below the age of 50 years were found with a high expression of COX-2 which may be associated with the prognosis of the disease. Alidina [27] finds that ESCC at the age < 55 years influence survival. This contrasts with Hu et al. [18], who find a high expression of COX-2 in patients aged 50 years or more. Patients of ESCC enrolled in this study showed increase frequency of naswar use. This may be due to a difference in the personal and cultural habits as well as ethnic differences. No significant difference of COX-2 expression was noticed among naswar user and non users.Though consumption of alcohol is considered as a risk factor in some studies [1], however, our patients had no history of consumption of alcohol. Similarly, smoking history was also correlated but p-values were not significant. Relevant literature also suggests that in less developed countries, smoking does not play a role in prevalence of high ESCC [17].

There was no remarkable statistical difference in patients with increasing tumor size, varying grades, lymph node invasion, and depth of invasion, stage of the disease and their expression of COX-2 (Table 3). The lack of over expression of COX-2 with statistically insignificant clinico pathological variables could be due to lesser number of cases at our disposal. Our results are similar to the Kuo et al. [33], who find that COX-2 over expression was associated with fewer metastasis and less advanced malignancy. Whereas our results are not consistent with the findings of other studies [26,35-38], showing COX-2 over expression was significantly associated with the tumor invasion and disease stage.

In several studies it was noticed that COX-2 promotes proliferation, angiogenesis and inhibits apoptosis [39]. In the current study overexpression of COX-2 in CIS and ESCC tissue may be associated with the development and progression of the disease. Our finding suggests that COX-2 can be a potential predictive biomarker, correlating with the other studies. Selective inhibitors of COX-2 like non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs could possibly play a role in the prevention of such malignancies, as reported for its beneficial effect in different malignancies [17].

Two limitations of the study are noteworthy. First, the sample size of this study being relatively small, to assess the correlation of COX-2 expression with the clinicopathological parameters, a larger scale study could be beneficial. Second, as normal individuals i.e. those not suffering from cancer, which use naswar were not the subject of the study, we could not establish whether or not naswar is a risk factor even though a large number of patients were found to be using naswar.

Table 1: Frequency of Naswar Use in Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa region of Pakistan.

Status Naswar Use Total
ESCC User: No (%) Nonuser: No 
(%)
No (%)
46 (67) 23 (33) 69
Abbreviations: ESCC: Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma;

Table 2: Multiple comparison of COX-2 expression in normal healthy mucosa, CIS and tumor tissue of ESCC

Table 2A: ANOVA.

                                                     COX-2 IHC Score
  Sum of Squares df Mean Square F p-value
Between Groups 1758.157 2 879.078 48.294 .000

Table 3: Correlation of COX-2 immunohisto expression with clinicopatological parameters:

Clinicopatological parameters COX-2 immunohistoexpression Total
N (%)
p-value
Negative expression
N (%)
Strong expression
N (%)
ESCC Naswar User 16 (35) 30 (65) 46 (100) -718
Nonuser 7 (30) 16 (70) 23(100)
        69(100)
ESCC Age ≤50 8 (29) 20 (71) 28(100) .488
>50 15 (37) 26 (63) 41(100)
        69(100)
ESCC Origin Pakistan 13 (22) 33 (78) 46(100) -206
Afghan 10 (25) 13 (75) 23(100)
        69(100)
ESCC Smoking Yes 7 (27) 19 (73) 26(100) -380
No 16 (37) 27 (63) 43(100)
        69(100)
ESCC Tumor size 
(cm)
1-3 3 (25) 9 (75) 12(100) -740
3.1-7 15 (37) 26 (63) 41(100)
>7 5 (31) 11 (69) 16(100)
          69(100)  
ESCC Tumor Grade I 9 (35) 17 (65) 26(100) -588
II 10 (38) 16 (62) 26(100)
III 4 (24) 13 (76) 17(100)
        69(100)  
ESCC Stage 1 8 (36) 14 (64) 22(100) .541
2 9(39) 14 (61) 23 (100)
3 6(29) 15(71) 21(100)
4 0 (00) 3 (100) 3(100)
        69 (100)
ESCC L.N invasion NX 8(40) 12 (60) 20(100) .547
N0 10 (38.5) 16 (61.5) 26 (100)
N1(1-2) 4 (21) 15(79) 19(100)
N2 (3-6) 1 (25) 3 (75) 4 (100)
        69(100)
ESCC Depth of 
invasion
T1 0(0) 2 (100) 2(100) 583
T2 14 (33) 28 (66) 42(100)  
T3, T4 9(36) 16 (54) 25(100)
        69(100)
Abbreviations: ESCC: Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma; LN: Lymph Node; NX: Cannot Be Asscessed; N0: No Regional Lymph Node Metastasis; 
N1: Regional Lymph Node Metastasis Involving 1-2 Lymph Node; N2: Regional Lymph Node Metastasis Involving 3-6 Lymph Node; N: Number; T1: 
Tumor Invades Lamina Propria or Submucosa; T2: Tumor Invades Muscularispropria; T3: Tumor Invades Adventitia; T4: Tumor Invades Adjacent 
Structures; Tumor grade: (I: well differentiated, II: moderately differentiated, III: Poorly differentiated). (According to AJCC Staging
 

 

CONCLUSION

Naswar use is more common in patients of ESCC in the KP province of Pakistan and is even more prevalent in the neighboring Afghanistan. We observed high prevalence of ESCC despite the high use of vegetable diet and non-use of spicy food and hot beverages. The high occurrence of this disease demands aggressive measures to prevent the incidence of this disease. It also highlights the need for improved public health practices to reduce the addiction to tobacco and snuffing. The cohort 23- 85 years shows statistically significant difference in expression of COX-2 gene in ESCC and CIS tissue sample compared to normal healthy mucosa. Over-expression of COX-2 is positively associated with ESCC.

Further studies on a larger scale are needed to confirm the prognostic and predictive value of COX-2 in this high risk population. High COX-2 expression in ESCC may potentially be beneficial using COX-2 inhibitors.

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We are thankful to Higher Education Commission of Pakistan (HEC) for funding this project (HEC-NRPU-4222) and providing salary to Shahida Tasneem.

REFERENCES

1. Badar F, Anwar N, Mahmood S. Geographical variation in the epidemiology of esophageal cancer in Pakistan. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2005; 6: 139-142.

2. Zhang HZ, Jin GF, Shen HB. Epidemiologic differences in esophageal cancer between Asian and Western populations. Chin J Cancer. 2012; 31: 281-286.

3. Chen MQ, Xu BH, Zhang YY. Analysis of prognostic factors for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with distant organ metastasis at initial diagnosis. Journal Chin Med Association. 2014; 77: 562-566.

4. Mirinezhad SK, Somi MH, Jangjoo AG, Seyednezhad F, Dastgiri S, Mohammadzadeh M, et al. Survival rate and prognostic factors of esophageal cancer in east Azerbaijan province, North-west of Iran. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012; 13: 3451-3454.

5. Wang F, Xuan XY, Yang X, Cao L, Pang LN, Zhou R, et al. Stathmin is a marker of progression and poor prognosis in esophageal carcinoma. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014; 15: 3613-3618.

6. Lin Y, Totsuka Y, He Y, Kikuchi S, Qiao Y, Ueda J, et al. Epidemiology of esophageal cancer in Japan and China. J Epidemiol. 2013; 23: 233-242.

7. Ashktorab H, Nouri Z, Nouraie M, Razjouyan H, Lee EE, Dowlati E, et al. Esophageal carcinoma in African Americans: a five-decade experience.Dig Dis Sci. 2011; 56: 3577-3582. 

8. Coupland V, Lagergren J, Konfortion J, Allum W, Mendall M, Hardwick R, et al. Ethnicity in relation to incidence of oesophageal and gastric cancer in England. Br J Cancer. 2012; 107: 1908-1914.

9. Jamal S. Esophageal Cancer in Pakistan. PAFMJ. 2010; 60. 

10. Vaiphei K, Sinha SK, Kochhar R. Comparative analysis of Oct 4 in different histological subtypes of esophageal squamous cell carcinomas in different clinical conditions. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014; 15: 3519-3524.

11. Bhurgri Y, Bhurgri A, Nishter S, Ahmed A, Usman A, Pervez S, et al. Pakistan-country profile of cancer and cancer control 1995-2004. J Pak Med Assoc. 2006; 56: 124-130.

12. Dar NA, Bhat GA, Shah IA, Iqbal B, Makhdoomi MA, Nisar I, et al. Hookah smoking, nass chewing, and oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma in Kashmir, India. Br J Cancer. 2012; 107: 1618-1623.

13. Janbaz KH, Qadir MI, Basser HT, Bokhari TH, Ahmad B. Risk for oral cancer from smokeless tobacco. Contemp Oncol (Pozn). 2014; 18: 160-164.

14. Lyon. Smokeless tobacco and some tobacco specific N-Nitrosamines. IARC Working Group on The Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks To Humans. 89: WHO IARC; 2007.

15. Kim GY, Lim SJ, Kim YW. Expression of HuR, COX-2, and survivin in lung cancers; cytoplasmic HuR stabilizes cyclooxygenase-2 in squamous cell carcinomas. Mod Pathol. 2011; 24: 1336-1347.

16. Pathologist CoA. Protocol for the Examination of Specimens from Patients with Carcinoma of the Esophagus. Protocol applies to all carcinomas of the esophagus, including esophagogastric junction carcinomas Well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (carcinoid tumors) are not included. USA: College of American pathologist; 2016.

17. Roelofs HM, Te Morsche RH, van Heumen BW, Nagengast FM, Peters WH. Over-expression of COX-2 mRNA in colorectal cancer. BMC gastroenterol. 2014; 14.

18. Hu D, Zhang M, Wang S, Wang Z. High expression of cyclooxygenase 2 is an indicator of prognosis for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Thorac Cancer. 2016; 7: 310-315.

19. Devesa SS, Blot WJ, Fraumeni JF. Changing patterns in the incidence of esophageal and gastric carcinoma in the United States. Cancer. 1998; 83: 2049-2053. 20.Hashimoto N. Expression of COX2 and p53 in Rat Esophageal Cancer Induced by Reflux of Duodenal Contents. ISRN Gastroenterol. 2012; 2012.

21. Zimmermann KC, Sarbia M, Weber AA, Borchard F, Gabbert HE, Schror K. Cyclooxygenase-2 expression in human esophageal carcinoma. Cancer Res. 1999; 59: 198-204.

22. Seyedmajidi M, Shafaee S, Siadati S, Khorasani M, Bijani A, Ghasemi N. Cyclo-oxygenase-2 expression in oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Cancer Res Therap. 2014; 10: 1024-1029.

23. Lian Y, Niu X, Cai H, Yang X, Ma H, Ma S, et al. Clinicopathological significance of c-MYC in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Tumor Biol. 2017; 39.

24. Li B, Feng W, Luo O, Xu T, Cao Y, Wu H, et al. Development and Validation of a Three-gene Prognostic Signature for Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Scientific Rep. 2017; 7.

25. Asting AG, Caren H, Andersson M, Lonnroth C, Lagerstedt K, Lundholm K. COX-2 gene expression in colon cancer tissue related to regulating factors and promoter methylation status. BMC cancer. 2011; 11: 238.

26. Zhi H, Wang L, Zhang J, Zhou C, Ding F, Luo A, et al. Significance of COX-2 expression in human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Carcinogenesis. 2005; 27: 1214-1221.

27. Alidina A, Gaffar A, Hussain F, Islam M, Vaziri I, Burney I, et al. Survival data and prognostic factors seen in Pakistani patients with esophageal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2004; 15: 118-122.

28. Akhtar S, Sheikh AA, Qureshi HU. Chewing areca nut, betel quid, oral snuff, cigarette smoking and the risk of oesophageal squamous-cell carcinoma in South Asians: a multicentre case–control study. Eur J Cancer. 2012; 48: 655-661.

29. Abdul MK, Mohammad SK, Najib UH. Oral snuff and carcinoma esophagus. GJM Sciences. 2009; 7: 58-61.

30. Elston DM. When Is a Skin Cancer a Cancer: The Histopathologist’s View. Non Surg Treatment Keratinocyte Skin Cancer. 2010; 9-14.

31. Braakhuis BJ, Tabor MP, Kummer JA, Leemans CR, Brakenhoff RH. A genetic explanation of Slaughter’s concept of field cancerization: evidence and clinical implications. Cancer Res. 2003; 63: 1727-1730.

32. YU HP, SHI LY, LU WH, SU YH, LI YY, XU SQ. Expression of cyclooxygenase?2 (COX?2) in human esophageal cancer and in vitro inhibition by a specific COX?2 inhibitor, NS?398. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004; 19: 638-642.

33. Kuo KT, Chow KC, Wu YC, Lin CS, Wang HW, Li WY. Clinicopathological significance of cyclooxygenase-2 over expression in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003; 76: 909-914.

34. Cui Y, Dong C, Wu BQ, Duan XC, Shi G, Gong M, et al. Expression of cyclooxygenase-2, vascular endothelial growth factor, and epidermal growth factor receptor in Chinese patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J Cancer Res Ther. 2015; 11: 44-48.

35. Alici S, Ugras S, Bayram I, Izmirli M. Prognostic factors and COX-2 expression in advanced stage esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Adv Ther. 2006; 23: 672-679.

36. Takatori H, Natsugoe S, Okumura H, Matsumoto M, Uchikado Y, Setoyama T, et al. Cyclooxygenase-2 expression is related to prognosis in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008; 34: 397-402.

37. Zhai XH, Yu JK, Lin C, Wang LD, Zheng S. Combining proteomics, serum biomarkers and bioinformatics to discriminate between esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and pre-cancerous lesion. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2012; 13: 964-971.

38. Huang JX, Xiao W, Chen WC, Lin MS, Song ZX, Chen P, et al. Relationship between COX-2 and cell cycle-regulatory proteins in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2010; 16: 5975-5981.

39. Shamma A, Yamamoto H, Doki Y, Okami J, Kondo M, Fujiwara Y, et al. Up-regulation of cyclooxygenase-2 in squamous carcinogenesis of the esophagus. Clin Cancer Res. 2000; 6: 1229-1238

Tasneem S, Sarwar MT, Bashir MR, Hussain H, Ahmed J, et al. (2018) Expression Analysis of COX-2 in Patients Suffering from Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. J Cancer Biol Res 6(2): 1116.

Received : 23 Apr 2018
Accepted : 23 May 2018
Published : 25 May 2018
Journals
Annals of Otolaryngology and Rhinology
ISSN : 2379-948X
Launched : 2014
JSM Schizophrenia
Launched : 2016
Journal of Nausea
Launched : 2020
JSM Internal Medicine
Launched : 2016
JSM Hepatitis
Launched : 2016
JSM Oro Facial Surgeries
ISSN : 2578-3211
Launched : 2016
Journal of Human Nutrition and Food Science
ISSN : 2333-6706
Launched : 2013
JSM Regenerative Medicine and Bioengineering
ISSN : 2379-0490
Launched : 2013
JSM Spine
ISSN : 2578-3181
Launched : 2016
Archives of Palliative Care
ISSN : 2573-1165
Launched : 2016
JSM Nutritional Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3203
Launched : 2017
Annals of Neurodegenerative Disorders
ISSN : 2476-2032
Launched : 2016
Journal of Fever
ISSN : 2641-7782
Launched : 2017
JSM Bone Marrow Research
ISSN : 2578-3351
Launched : 2016
JSM Mathematics and Statistics
ISSN : 2578-3173
Launched : 2014
Journal of Autoimmunity and Research
ISSN : 2573-1173
Launched : 2014
JSM Arthritis
ISSN : 2475-9155
Launched : 2016
JSM Head and Neck Cancer-Cases and Reviews
ISSN : 2573-1610
Launched : 2016
JSM General Surgery Cases and Images
ISSN : 2573-1564
Launched : 2016
JSM Anatomy and Physiology
ISSN : 2573-1262
Launched : 2016
JSM Dental Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1548
Launched : 2016
Annals of Emergency Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1017
Launched : 2016
Annals of Mens Health and Wellness
ISSN : 2641-7707
Launched : 2017
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Health Care
ISSN : 2576-0084
Launched : 2018
Journal of Chronic Diseases and Management
ISSN : 2573-1300
Launched : 2016
Annals of Vaccines and Immunization
ISSN : 2378-9379
Launched : 2014
JSM Heart Surgery Cases and Images
ISSN : 2578-3157
Launched : 2016
Annals of Reproductive Medicine and Treatment
ISSN : 2573-1092
Launched : 2016
JSM Brain Science
ISSN : 2573-1289
Launched : 2016
JSM Biomarkers
ISSN : 2578-3815
Launched : 2014
JSM Biology
ISSN : 2475-9392
Launched : 2016
Archives of Stem Cell and Research
ISSN : 2578-3580
Launched : 2014
Annals of Clinical and Medical Microbiology
ISSN : 2578-3629
Launched : 2014
JSM Pediatric Surgery
ISSN : 2578-3149
Launched : 2017
Journal of Memory Disorder and Rehabilitation
ISSN : 2578-319X
Launched : 2016
JSM Tropical Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2578-3165
Launched : 2016
JSM Head and Face Medicine
ISSN : 2578-3793
Launched : 2016
JSM Cardiothoracic Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1297
Launched : 2016
JSM Bone and Joint Diseases
ISSN : 2578-3351
Launched : 2017
JSM Bioavailability and Bioequivalence
ISSN : 2641-7812
Launched : 2017
JSM Atherosclerosis
ISSN : 2573-1270
Launched : 2016
Journal of Genitourinary Disorders
ISSN : 2641-7790
Launched : 2017
Journal of Fractures and Sprains
ISSN : 2578-3831
Launched : 2016
Journal of Autism and Epilepsy
ISSN : 2641-7774
Launched : 2016
Annals of Marine Biology and Research
ISSN : 2573-105X
Launched : 2014
JSM Health Education & Primary Health Care
ISSN : 2578-3777
Launched : 2016
JSM Communication Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3807
Launched : 2016
Annals of Musculoskeletal Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3599
Launched : 2016
Annals of Virology and Research
ISSN : 2573-1122
Launched : 2014
JSM Renal Medicine
ISSN : 2573-1637
Launched : 2016
Journal of Muscle Health
ISSN : 2578-3823
Launched : 2016
JSM Genetics and Genomics
ISSN : 2334-1823
Launched : 2013
JSM Anxiety and Depression
ISSN : 2475-9139
Launched : 2016
Clinical Journal of Heart Diseases
ISSN : 2641-7766
Launched : 2016
Annals of Medicinal Chemistry and Research
ISSN : 2378-9336
Launched : 2014
JSM Pain and Management
ISSN : 2578-3378
Launched : 2016
JSM Women's Health
ISSN : 2578-3696
Launched : 2016
Clinical Research in HIV or AIDS
ISSN : 2374-0094
Launched : 2013
Journal of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Obesity
ISSN : 2333-6692
Launched : 2013
Journal of Substance Abuse and Alcoholism
ISSN : 2373-9363
Launched : 2013
JSM Neurosurgery and Spine
ISSN : 2373-9479
Launched : 2013
Journal of Liver and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2379-0830
Launched : 2014
Journal of Drug Design and Research
ISSN : 2379-089X
Launched : 2014
JSM Clinical Oncology and Research
ISSN : 2373-938X
Launched : 2013
JSM Bioinformatics, Genomics and Proteomics
ISSN : 2576-1102
Launched : 2014
JSM Chemistry
ISSN : 2334-1831
Launched : 2013
Journal of Trauma and Care
ISSN : 2573-1246
Launched : 2014
JSM Surgical Oncology and Research
ISSN : 2578-3688
Launched : 2016
Annals of Food Processing and Preservation
ISSN : 2573-1033
Launched : 2016
Journal of Radiology and Radiation Therapy
ISSN : 2333-7095
Launched : 2013
JSM Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
ISSN : 2578-3572
Launched : 2016
Annals of Clinical Pathology
ISSN : 2373-9282
Launched : 2013
Annals of Cardiovascular Diseases
ISSN : 2641-7731
Launched : 2016
Journal of Behavior
ISSN : 2576-0076
Launched : 2016
Annals of Clinical and Experimental Metabolism
ISSN : 2572-2492
Launched : 2016
Clinical Research in Infectious Diseases
ISSN : 2379-0636
Launched : 2013
JSM Microbiology
ISSN : 2333-6455
Launched : 2013
Journal of Urology and Research
ISSN : 2379-951X
Launched : 2014
Journal of Family Medicine and Community Health
ISSN : 2379-0547
Launched : 2013
Annals of Pregnancy and Care
ISSN : 2578-336X
Launched : 2017
JSM Cell and Developmental Biology
ISSN : 2379-061X
Launched : 2013
Annals of Aquaculture and Research
ISSN : 2379-0881
Launched : 2014
Clinical Research in Pulmonology
ISSN : 2333-6625
Launched : 2013
Journal of Immunology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2333-6714
Launched : 2013
Annals of Forensic Research and Analysis
ISSN : 2378-9476
Launched : 2014
JSM Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
ISSN : 2333-7109
Launched : 2013
Annals of Breast Cancer Research
ISSN : 2641-7685
Launched : 2016
Annals of Gerontology and Geriatric Research
ISSN : 2378-9409
Launched : 2014
Journal of Sleep Medicine and Disorders
ISSN : 2379-0822
Launched : 2014
JSM Burns and Trauma
ISSN : 2475-9406
Launched : 2016
Chemical Engineering and Process Techniques
ISSN : 2333-6633
Launched : 2013
Annals of Clinical Cytology and Pathology
ISSN : 2475-9430
Launched : 2014
JSM Allergy and Asthma
ISSN : 2573-1254
Launched : 2016
Journal of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
ISSN : 2334-2307
Launched : 2013
Annals of Sports Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2379-0571
Launched : 2014
JSM Sexual Medicine
ISSN : 2578-3718
Launched : 2016
Annals of Vascular Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2378-9344
Launched : 2014
JSM Biotechnology and Biomedical Engineering
ISSN : 2333-7117
Launched : 2013
Journal of Hematology and Transfusion
ISSN : 2333-6684
Launched : 2013
JSM Environmental Science and Ecology
ISSN : 2333-7141
Launched : 2013
Journal of Cardiology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2333-6676
Launched : 2013
JSM Nanotechnology and Nanomedicine
ISSN : 2334-1815
Launched : 2013
Journal of Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders
ISSN : 2475-9473
Launched : 2016
JSM Ophthalmology
ISSN : 2333-6447
Launched : 2013
Journal of Pharmacology and Clinical Toxicology
ISSN : 2333-7079
Launched : 2013
Annals of Psychiatry and Mental Health
ISSN : 2374-0124
Launched : 2013
Medical Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
ISSN : 2333-6439
Launched : 2013
Annals of Pediatrics and Child Health
ISSN : 2373-9312
Launched : 2013
JSM Clinical Pharmaceutics
ISSN : 2379-9498
Launched : 2014
JSM Foot and Ankle
ISSN : 2475-9112
Launched : 2016
JSM Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementia
ISSN : 2378-9565
Launched : 2014
Journal of Addiction Medicine and Therapy
ISSN : 2333-665X
Launched : 2013
Journal of Veterinary Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2378-931X
Launched : 2013
Annals of Public Health and Research
ISSN : 2378-9328
Launched : 2014
Annals of Orthopedics and Rheumatology
ISSN : 2373-9290
Launched : 2013
Journal of Clinical Nephrology and Research
ISSN : 2379-0652
Launched : 2014
Annals of Community Medicine and Practice
ISSN : 2475-9465
Launched : 2014
Annals of Biometrics and Biostatistics
ISSN : 2374-0116
Launched : 2013
JSM Clinical Case Reports
ISSN : 2373-9819
Launched : 2013
Journal of Surgery and Transplantation Science
ISSN : 2379-0911
Launched : 2013
Journal of Dermatology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2373-9371
Launched : 2013
JSM Gastroenterology and Hepatology
ISSN : 2373-9487
Launched : 2013
Annals of Nursing and Practice
ISSN : 2379-9501
Launched : 2014
JSM Dentistry
ISSN : 2333-7133
Launched : 2013
Author Information X