Loading

Journal of Clinical Nephrology and Research

First Time Sodium Bicarbonate Catheter Lock Solution is Found to be a Safe and Effective Lock Method in Preventing Hemodialysis Catheter Loss due to Lumen Clot Formation

Case Series | Open Access | Volume 4 | Issue 5

  • 1. Department of Nephrology, Coney Island Hospital, USA
  • 2. Department of Business Analytics and Information Systems, St. John’s University, USA
+ Show More - Show Less
Corresponding Authors
Adel S El- Hennawy, Department of Nephrology, Coney Island Hospital, Brooklyn, NY, USA, Tel: 718966-4864
ABSTRACT

Background: Central venous catheters, originally introduced as vascular access for short-term dialysis, have become an acceptable form of permanent vascular access. Both non-tunneled, non-cuffed and cuffed, tunneled hemodialysis catheters are used for vascular access in HD patients who have no alternative access or are awaiting placement or maturation of AVF. One of the major causes of catheter loss is clot formation in catheter lumen. Locking catheter with heparin has been associated with increased risk of bleeding in some dialysis patients. Hence, the effective of sodium bicarbonate (8.4 %) solution used as an alternative method for catheter lock solution is considered because it is easily available, inexpensive and easy to be popularized. Its anticoagulant principle is still unclear. It can be speculated that its mechanism of action includes binding calcium and removing it from the many enzymes of the coagulation system that require it as a cofactor.

Method: One hundred patients with inserted HD catheter were randomly divided into two groups: SBCLS (Sodium Bicarbonate Catheter Lock Solution) and NSCLS (Normal Saline Catheter Lock Solution), over a period of six months. After the hemodialysis treatment had been completed, each lumen of the catheter in 50 patients of the NSCLS group was flushed with 18 ml of 0.9 % sodium chloride and locked with the 2 ml of locking solution. Three patients were excluded from NSCLS group and the analysis due to removal of catheters for catheter related sepsis. For the 50 patients in the SBCLS group, each lumen of the catheter was flushed with 18 ml of Na HCO3 8.4% and locked with the 2 ml of locking solution. Heparin free HD was used for both groups during the study. The incidence of catheter thrombosis was followed up at each time of HD. Thrombosis was evaluated by resistance or complete occlusion to inflow or out flow of catheter ports before initiation of heparin free HD or during HD treatment if blood flow is less than 200 ml/min in the early time of HD.

Results: The incidence of catheter retention rate (RR) in NSCLS group 78.72% and in SBCLS group 98%. In the NSCLS group 10 catheters were removed due to clot formation and three catheters were removed due to catheter related sepsis. The three infected catheters are excluded from the study. However, in the SBCLS group only one catheter was removed (due to resistance of the outflow of red catheter port). The Chi-Square test was used to determine whether there was a significant difference between the two groups. In the NSCLS group 10 catheters were removed due to clot formation and 37 catheters continued functioning while in the SBCLS group 1 catheter was lost and 49 continued functioning (P = 0.003).

Conclusion: SBCLS is an effective and safe lock solution for both non-tunneled, non-cuffed and tunneled, cuffed catheters that may provide prolonged catheter use with a diminution in catheter occlusion.

KEYWORDS

• Hemodialysis • Catheter lock • Clotted catheter • Sodium bicarbonate • ESRD

CITATION

El- Hennawy AS, Frolova E, Pollack S (2017) First Time Sodium Bicarbonate Catheter Lock Solution is Found to be a Safe and Effective Lock Method in Preventing Hemodialysis Catheter Loss due to Lumen Clot Formation. J Clin Nephrol Res 4(5): 1078.

ABBREVIATIONS

HD: Hemodialysis; NaHCO3 : Sodium Bicarbonate; SBCLS: Sodium Bicarbonate 8.4% Catheter Lock Solution; NSCLS: Normal Saline 0.9% Catheter Lock Solution; HS: Heparin Solution; RR: Retention Rate; mEq: Milliequivalent; L: Liter; AVF: ArterioVenous Fistula; IJV: Internal Jugular Vein; ESRD: End Stage Renal Disease; NSAID: Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug

INTRODUCTION

Central venous catheters, originally introduced as vascular access for short-term dialysis, have become an acceptable form of permanent vascular access [1]. It is common practice to provide patients with ESRD, three-times-weekly hemodialysis (HD) for 3-4 hours to be effective with blood flows in the adult patient of at least 300 mL/minute [2]. Today so many diabetic and elderly patients developing end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and the veins of their arms are too small or too jugular vein and the 6 month tunneled dialysis catheter patency rate was 37% for left IJV catheters, versus 54% for right IJV catheters [3].

In North America, the creation of the arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is the optimal form of access for patients on hemodialysis (HD). However, the majority of patients start HD with a hemodialysis catheter, and many continue to use a catheter 90 days after placement. Additionally, as the population of patients on HD grows older, the number of patients dependent on a catheter as their permanent mode of HD access increases. When catheters are used with the proper care, they may decrease patient morbidity and mortality [4]. In one prospective study involving 108 tunneled catheter-dependent hemodialysis patients, the cumulative likelihood of catheter-related bacteremia was 35 percent within three months and 48 percent within six months of catheter insertion [5]. The outcomes of tunneled femoral hemodialysis catheters in comparison with internal jugular vein catheters showed IJV is preferred [6]. In the United States, highefficiency dialysis as practiced requires dialyzer-delivered blood flow rates greater than 300 mL/min to achieve the target singlepool Kt/V of 1.2 [7]. The consequences of catheter dysfunction are many, including increases in morbidity and mortality [8]. In some studies, clotted catheter accounts for 10%-42% of catheter malfunctioning depending on catheter site [9]; for which thrombolytic agents, such as recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA), are effective [10]. Heparin is routinely used as a “locking” solution for preventing thrombosis-related catheter malfunction [11]. Many other agents, such as warfarin [12], sodium citrate [13,14], low-molecular weight heparin [15] and concentrated sodium chloride [16] have been studied for the same purpose. Since there was no ideal catheter lock solution, it was reasonable to evaluate an alternative catheter lock solution and we selected NaHCO3 solution because it is found to be cheap, available and easily popularized. Furthermore, empiric testing of blood of 10 normal volunteers by drawing 1.5 cc of blood from each one and putting 0.5cc in one empty tube, second 0.5 cc in tube with 1 cc NaCl 0.9 % and third 0.5 cc in tube with 1 cc NaHCO3 8.4 %. Following tubes visually for 30 min showed formation of clot in the 10 empty tubes and in the 10 tubes with NSS. No formation of clot in the 10 tubes with NaHCO3 . The results were very encouraging and supported our theory. However, we could not find any literature related to NaHCO3 lock solution; Its anticoagulant principle is still unclear. It can be speculated that its mechanism of action is through binding calcium and removing it from the many enzymes of the coagulation system that require it as a cofactor. For first time, easily available NaHCO3 8.4% solution is used as an effective alternative catheter lock solution method for all patients who are receiving HD by both non-tunneled, non-cuffed and cuffed, tunneled hemodialysis catheters with remarkable success. There was no increase in rate of infection or bleeding in patients in NaHCO3 group.

 

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Sodium bicarbonate description

Sodium Bicarbonate is a sterile, non pyrogenic solution with a concentration of 8.4%. The solution contains no bacteriostatic or antimicrobial agent. Concentration selection was based on the molecular weight of NaHCO3 . Each ml contains Sodium Bicarbonate, 84 mg with an osmolarity of 2 mOsmol/ml and pH 8.0 (7.0 to 8.5).

Sodium chloride solution description

Sodium chloride 0.9% is a sterile non pyrogenic solution contains 9g/L Sodium Chloride (NaCl) with an osmolarity of 308 mOsmol/L at pH 5.5 (4.5 to 7.0).

Dialysis machine

4008K2 Fresenius dialysis machine.

Dialyzer

Optiflux single use unit of polysulfone membrane. There is no reuse program in our dialysis center.

Catheters

Both non-tunneled, non-cuffed and tunneled, cuffed hemodialysis catheters are included in the study. Catheters were used for hemodialysis treatment only. Non-tunneled, non-cuffed catheter: Mahurkar Acute Dual Lumen Catheter right or left tunneled, cuffed catheter: Palindrome Precision Chronic Catheter right or left. All catheters are inserted by an expert operator under strict asepsis. Catheter exit site dressing changes after each HD treatment. Catheter manipulation was performed by a trained dialysis staff wearing masks and non-sterile gloves. Use of dry gauze dressings at the catheter exit site was implemented.

Dialysis treatment

91 Patients receive HD treatment three times /week. 9 patients received HD treatment 5 times /week. All dialysis patients were receiving heparin free-HD therapy. Duration of each HD session is 3 Hours. Remove and discard the last SBCLS or NSCLS before connecting HD catheter to machine. After HD treatment catheter blood is rinsed back thoroughly with normal saline solution. Catheter is flushed and locked with 20 ml in each port with either isotonic sodium chloride in NSCLS group or NaHCO3 8.4% solution in SBCLS group.

Patients

One hundred acute or chronic renal failure patients were enrolled. 90 of them received right internal jugular veins, 9 left internal jugular veins and one patient left femoral vein catheterization with both non tunneled, non-cuffed and cuffed, tunneled hemodialysis catheters from July 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014. Patients were randomized to either NSCLS or SBCLS regardless of their age, gender, Diabetes Mellitus, hypertension or any other medical condition.

Patients with the following criteria were excluded from the study:

1- Patients who are receiving Coumadin or thrombolytic agents.

2- Patients with abnormal PTT, PT and INR.

3- Patient with infected catheter before or during the 6 months period of the study.

Patients in both groups were closely monitored for any evidence of adverse reaction each time a catheter lock solution was removed or infused to the catheter. Due to withdrawal of urokinase from the market since June 1999, the routine practice in our dialysis unit is to change dialysis catheter if a catheter showed evidence of occlusion. In HD unit it is our routine to keep venous pressure less than 200 mmHg and blood flow more than 300 ml/min. Nurses and technicians wear masks and non sterile gloves and the patient wears a mask while the catheter is opened. New, sterile caps are placed on the catheter following each procedure. Catheters and connections are inspected for leaks or evidence of damage during each treatment. Other than the change in locking solution, there was no change in procedures for catheter use or care.

Study design

This is a prospective, randomized controlled study. One hundred patients with an inserted HD catheter were randomly divided into two groups: SBCLS (Sodium Bicarbonate Catheter Lock Solution) and NSCLS (Normal Saline Catheter Lock Solution), over a period of six months. After the hemodialysis treatment had been completed, each lumen of the catheter in 50 patients of the NSCLS group was flushed with 18 ml of 0.9% sodium chloride and locked with the 2 ml of locking solution. Three patients were excluded from the NSCLS group and the analysis due to removal of catheters for catheter related sepsis.

For the 50 patients in the SBCLS group, each lumen of the catheter was flushed with 18 ml of NaHCO3 8.4% and locked with the 2 ml of locking solution. Heparin free HD was used for both groups during the study. The incidence of catheter thrombosis was followed up at each time of HD. Thrombosis was evaluated by resistance or complete occlusion to inflow or out flow of catheter ports before initiation of heparin free HD or during HD treatment if blood flow is less than 200 ml/min in the early time of HD.

Statistical analysis

Results are expressed as mean (standard deviation) or as n (%). Chi Square or Fisher’s exact test was used to compare the differences in categorical variables between the NSCLS and SBCLS groups. Independent t-tests were used for comparison of continuous variables. Kaplan-Meier life table analysis was used to document and test for any differences in the time to the catheter removal event. P-values less than 0.05 were deemed statistically significant; no multiple-test adjustment to the p-value was done. All analyses were conducted using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute, Inc, Cary, NC).

 

 

RESULTS

The randomization was effective in that there were no statistical differences between the two groups with respect to demographic, biochemical or clinical characteristics. See Tables 1

Table 1: Comparison of categorical demographic and clinical characteristics.

Variable Total sample N=97 SBCLS N=50 NSCLS N=47 P-value
Sex (% male) 55 (53.5%) 30 (60%) 23(46.9%) 0.19
HTN 89 (89.9%) 46(92%) 43(87.8%) 0.48
CAD/CHF 67 (68.4%) 36(73.5%) 31(63.3%) 0.27
DM 54 (55.1%) 27(55.1%) 27(55.1%) 1

and Table 2.

Table 2: Comparison of continuous demographic and clinical characteristics.

  Total Sample N=97 SBCLS N=50 NSCLS N=47 t-test
Variable Mean (stddev) P-valve
Age 67.0 (15.2) 66.8 (16.2) 67.2 (14.3) 0.91
Height 164.0 (9.4) 164.1 (11.1) 163.8 (7.4) 0.89
Weight 75.8 (20.4) 74.7 (17.6) 77.0 (23) 0.58
SBP 129.9 (17.4) 133.3 (15.8) 126.5 (18.4) 0.0502
DBP 68.6 (8.8) 69.6 (8.4) 67.6 (9.3) 0.26
#CATH 1.1 (0.3) 1.1 (0.3) 1.1 (0.3) 0.77
# HD TX 6.1 (4.4) 5.9 (4) 6.2 (4.8) 0.71
ALB 3.1 (0.6) 3.1 (0.7) 3.1 (0.6) 0.8
BICARB 23.73 (3) 24.66 (2.5) 22.84 (3.1) 0.002
GFR 9.37 (2.6) 9.42 (2.7) 9.33 (2.6) 0.86
HB 9.16 (1.3) 9.19 (1.1) 9.14 (1.5) 0.84
INR 1.11 (0.1) 1.12 (0.2) 1.11 (0.1) 0.83
PHOS# 4.01 (1.4) 4 (1.3) 4.03 (1.5) 0.89
PT 11.93 (1) 11.94 (1.1) 11.93 (1) 0.92
PTT 30.01 (2.8) 30.46 (2.4) 29.54 (3) 0.10

The mean age was 67 (15) years, 54% were male, and the race distribution was almost identical (62% white, 11% black, 5% Asian 16% Hispanic and 5% other (p=0.95).

The incidence of catheter retention rate (RR) in the NSCLS group 78.72% and in SBCLS group 98% as seen in Figure 1. In NSCLS group 10 patients (out of the 47 followed) had catheters removed due to clot formation. By comparison, in the SBCLS group only one patient’s catheter (among the 49 followed) was removed due to resistance of the outflow of red catheter port (Fischer Exact P= value of 0.003) see Figures 1

Shows in blue Catheter Retention Rate (RR) in normal saline  catheter lock solution (NSCLS) group 78.72% versus in red catheter  RR in sodium bicarbonate catheter lock solution (SBCLS) group 98%  in over 6 months.

Figure 1 Shows in blue Catheter Retention Rate (RR) in normal saline catheter lock solution (NSCLS) group 78.72% versus in red catheter RR in sodium bicarbonate catheter lock solution (SBCLS) group 98% in over 6 months.

and Figure 2.

Shows the Kaplan-Meier survival curves for the time course  of the lost and functioning catheters in both NaCl Lock solution and  NaHCO3 Lock solution groups due to clot formation during a period  of 6 months. P= 0.003

Figure 2 Shows the Kaplan-Meier survival curves for the time course of the lost and functioning catheters in both NaCl Lock solution and NaHCO3 Lock solution groups due to clot formation during a period of 6 months. P= 0.003

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Central venous catheters, originally introduced as vascular access for short-term dialysis, have become an acceptable form of permanent vascular access. Both non-tunneled, non-cuffed catheters and tunneled, cuffed catheters are available.

These catheters are also used for permanent vascular access in some patients, particularly those with limited alternative options for vascular access [4]. Approximately 17-18% of HD patients select tunneled cuffed catheter as long-term vascular access [17]. The common method to ensure patency of HD catheter is locking them with heparin whose concentration is from 1000U/ mL to 10,000 U/mL. Each HD unit uses different concentration and there is no unified standard [18]. However, heparin lock alters coagulation studies and the risk of heparin lock-related bleeding when using in dwelling venous catheter in hemodialysis and bleeding complications related to heparin lock have been reported [19,20]. American Diagnostic and Interventional Society of Nephrology recommended that locking catheter with low concentration (1000 U/mL) HS or 4% citrate was the method with relatively lower bleeding risk [20]. Even after removing and discarding the last HS catheter lock solution, the left heparin attaching to the wall of lumens could have anticoagulation effect at start of HD and APTT of 5 min. after starting HD was also extended by 13.6% longer than the last baseline [21]. Therefore, the overflowing heparin from catheter is an important reason of increased bleeding risk after HD [22].

We propose that NaHCO3 8.4% solution might be used as catheter lock solution for locking both non-tunneled, non-cuffed and cuffed tunneled hemodialysis catheters. Since it is not an anticoagulant and will not increase bleeding risk even overflowing into circulation, it appears that SBCLS is very effective in preventing clotting of catheters. Effectiveness of SBCLS appears to be superior to NSCLS in preventing catheter clotting in our clinical study. Using SBCLS to flush and lock catheters is very safe and there was no evidence of transient hypocalcemic symptoms. Due to the risk of using heparin and citrate solution, SBCLS is clearly a safe way to lock catheters. So it would be a safer catheter lock method for patients with high bleeding risk.

Our study evaluated this new alternative catheter lock method because SBCLS is inexpensive, available and easily popularized. Furthermore, empiric testing of blood of 10 normal volunteers by drawing 1.5 cc of blood from each one and putting 0.5 cc in one empty tube, second 0.5 cc in tube with 1 cc NaCl 0.9% and third 0.5 cc in tube with 1 cc NaHCO3 8.4%. Following tubes visually for 30 min showed formation of clot in the 10 empty tubes and in the 10 tubes with NSS. No formation of clot in the 10 tubes with NaHCO3 . The results were encouraging and supported to our theory.

Since we have not found any literatures related to NaHCO3 lock solution, its anticoagulant principle still cannot be definitely explained. It can be speculated that its mechanism of action is by binding calcium and removing it from the many enzymes of the coagulation system that require it as a cofactor [23].

Safety of using citrate solution as a catheter lock solution became an issue when the FDA reported death due to cardiac arrest shortly after an ESRD patient received a rapid injection of 5 mL 47% citrate into one lumen of a central vein, tunneled catheter, just after placement, for the purpose of anticoagulation [22]. However, the Medical Device Report (MDR) indicated that the patient did not expire immediately, but more than 24 hours later after receiving citrate catheter lock solution [23,24].

 

CONCLUSION

Sodium Bicarbonate solution may provide significant advantages for catheter lock in patients with all types of central venous catheters, reducing catheter clotting and increasing retention rate without going into risks of using citrate or heparin.

REFERENCES

1. Michael A, Daniel JS. Tunneled, cuffed hemodialysis catheter-related bacteremia. 2014.

2. Jindal K, Chan CT, Deziel C, Hirsch D, Soroka SD, Tonelli M, et al. Hemodialysis clinical practice guidelines for the Canadian Society of Nephrology. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006; 17: 1-27.

3. Shingarev R, Barker-Finkel J, Allon M. Natural History of Tunneled Dialysis Catheters Placed for Hemodialysis initiation. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013; 24: 1289-1294.

4. Dutka P, Brickel H. A practical review of the kidney dialysis outcomes quality initiative (KDOQI) guidelines for hemodialysis catheters and their potential impact on patient care. Nephrol Nurs J. 2010; 37: 531- 535.

5. Lee T, Barker J, Allon M. Tunneled catheters in hemodialysis patients: reasons and subsequent outcomes. Am J Kidney Dis. 2005; 46: 501- 508.

6. Maya ID, Allon M. Outcomes of tunneled femoral hemodialysis catheters: Comparison with internal jugular vein catheters. Kidney Int. 2005; 68: 2886-2889.

7. National Kidney Foundation. KDOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines and Clinical Practice Recommendations for 2006 Updates: Hemodialysis Adequacy, Peritoneal Dialysis Adequacy and Vascular Access. Am J Kidney Dis. 2006; 48: 1-322.

8. Sehgal AR, Dor A, Tsai AC. Morbidity and cost implications of inadequate hemodialysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2001; 37: 1223-1231.

9. Schillinger F, Schillinger D, Montagnac R, Milcent T. Post catheterisation vein stenosis in haemodialysis: Comparative angiographic study of 50 subclavian and 50 internal jugular accesses. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1991; 6: 722-724.

10. Daeihagh P, Jordan J, Chen J, Rocco M. Efficacy of tissue plasminogen activator administration on patency of hemodialysis access catheters. Am J Kidney Dis. 2000; 36: 75-79.

11. Mojibian H, Spector M, Ni N, Eliseo D, Pollak J, Tal M, et al. Initial clinical experience with a new heparin-coated chronic hemodialysis catheter. Hemodial Int. 2009; 13: 329-334.

12. Willms L, Vercaigne LM. Does warfarin safely prevent clotting of emodialysis catheters? A review of efficacy and safety. Semin Dial. 2008; 21: 71-77.

13. Pierce DA, Rocco MV. Trisodium citrate: An alternative to unfractionated heparin for hemodialysis catheter dwells. Pharmacotherapy. 2010; 30: 1150-1158.

14. Power A, Duncan N, Singh SK, Brown W, Dalby E, Edwards C, et al. Sodium citrate versus heparin catheter locks for cuffed central venous catheters: A single-center randomized controlled trial. Am J Kidney Dis. 2009; 53: 1034-1041.

15. Malo J, Jolicoeur C, Theriault F, Lachaine J, Senecal L. Comparison between standard heparin and tinzaparin for haemodialysis catheter lock. ASAIO J. 2010; 56: 42-47.

16. Chen FK, Li JJ, Song Y, Zhang YY, Chen P, Zhao CZ, et al. Concentrated sodium chloride catheter lock solution--a new effective alternative method for hemodialysis patients with high bleeding risk. Ren Fail. 2014; 36: 17-22.

17. National Institutes of Health NIDDK/DKUHD (2010) USRDS 2010 Annual Data Report, volume two: atlas of End-Stage Renal Disease in the United States: 270-284.

18. John EM, Ash SR, ASDIN Clinical Practice Committee. Locking Solutions for Hemodialysis Catheters; Heparin and Citrate - A Position Paper by ASDIN. Semin Dial. 2008; 21: 490-492.

19. Karaaslan H, Peyronnet P, Benevent D, Lagarde C, Rince M, Leroux-Robert C. Risk of heparin lock-related bleeding when using indwelling venous catheter in haemodialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2001; 16: 2072-2074.

20. Stas KJ, Vanwalleghem J, De Moor B, Keuleers H. Trisodium citrate 30% vs heparin 5% as catheter lock in the interdialytic period in twinor double-lumen dialysis catheters for intermittent haemodialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2001; 16: 1521-1522.

21. Chen FK, Li JJ, Chen P, Zhao CZ, Gong HY, et al. The effect of heparin saline used for catheter locking after heparin-free dialysis on coagulation parameters in patients with high bleeding risk. Chin J Blood Purif. 2010; 11: 245-248.

22. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA issues warning on TriCitrasol dialysis catheter anticoagulant. US FDA Talk Paper. 2000; 16.

23. Ash SR, Mankus RA, Sutton JM, Criswell RE, Crull CC, Ing T, et al. Concentrated Sodium Citrate (23%) for Catheter Lock. Hemodial Int. 2000; 4: 22-31.

24. Hemodialysis Adequacy 2006 Work Group. Clinical practice guidelines for hemodialysis adequacy, update 2006. Am J Kidney Dis. 2006; 48: 2-90.

El- Hennawy AS, Frolova E, Pollack S (2017) First Time Sodium Bicarbonate Catheter Lock Solution is Found to be a Safe and Effective Lock Method in Preventing Hemodialysis Catheter Loss due to Lumen Clot Formation. J Clin Nephrol Res 4(5): 1078.

Received : 10 Oct 2017
Accepted : 15 Nov 2017
Published : 18 Nov 2017
Journals
Annals of Otolaryngology and Rhinology
ISSN : 2379-948X
Launched : 2014
JSM Schizophrenia
Launched : 2016
Journal of Nausea
Launched : 2020
JSM Internal Medicine
Launched : 2016
JSM Hepatitis
Launched : 2016
JSM Oro Facial Surgeries
ISSN : 2578-3211
Launched : 2016
Journal of Human Nutrition and Food Science
ISSN : 2333-6706
Launched : 2013
JSM Regenerative Medicine and Bioengineering
ISSN : 2379-0490
Launched : 2013
JSM Spine
ISSN : 2578-3181
Launched : 2016
Archives of Palliative Care
ISSN : 2573-1165
Launched : 2016
JSM Nutritional Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3203
Launched : 2017
Annals of Neurodegenerative Disorders
ISSN : 2476-2032
Launched : 2016
Journal of Fever
ISSN : 2641-7782
Launched : 2017
JSM Bone Marrow Research
ISSN : 2578-3351
Launched : 2016
JSM Mathematics and Statistics
ISSN : 2578-3173
Launched : 2014
Journal of Autoimmunity and Research
ISSN : 2573-1173
Launched : 2014
JSM Arthritis
ISSN : 2475-9155
Launched : 2016
JSM Head and Neck Cancer-Cases and Reviews
ISSN : 2573-1610
Launched : 2016
JSM General Surgery Cases and Images
ISSN : 2573-1564
Launched : 2016
JSM Anatomy and Physiology
ISSN : 2573-1262
Launched : 2016
JSM Dental Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1548
Launched : 2016
Annals of Emergency Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1017
Launched : 2016
Annals of Mens Health and Wellness
ISSN : 2641-7707
Launched : 2017
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Health Care
ISSN : 2576-0084
Launched : 2018
Journal of Chronic Diseases and Management
ISSN : 2573-1300
Launched : 2016
Annals of Vaccines and Immunization
ISSN : 2378-9379
Launched : 2014
JSM Heart Surgery Cases and Images
ISSN : 2578-3157
Launched : 2016
Annals of Reproductive Medicine and Treatment
ISSN : 2573-1092
Launched : 2016
JSM Brain Science
ISSN : 2573-1289
Launched : 2016
JSM Biomarkers
ISSN : 2578-3815
Launched : 2014
JSM Biology
ISSN : 2475-9392
Launched : 2016
Archives of Stem Cell and Research
ISSN : 2578-3580
Launched : 2014
Annals of Clinical and Medical Microbiology
ISSN : 2578-3629
Launched : 2014
JSM Pediatric Surgery
ISSN : 2578-3149
Launched : 2017
Journal of Memory Disorder and Rehabilitation
ISSN : 2578-319X
Launched : 2016
JSM Tropical Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2578-3165
Launched : 2016
JSM Head and Face Medicine
ISSN : 2578-3793
Launched : 2016
JSM Cardiothoracic Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1297
Launched : 2016
JSM Bone and Joint Diseases
ISSN : 2578-3351
Launched : 2017
JSM Bioavailability and Bioequivalence
ISSN : 2641-7812
Launched : 2017
JSM Atherosclerosis
ISSN : 2573-1270
Launched : 2016
Journal of Genitourinary Disorders
ISSN : 2641-7790
Launched : 2017
Journal of Fractures and Sprains
ISSN : 2578-3831
Launched : 2016
Journal of Autism and Epilepsy
ISSN : 2641-7774
Launched : 2016
Annals of Marine Biology and Research
ISSN : 2573-105X
Launched : 2014
JSM Health Education & Primary Health Care
ISSN : 2578-3777
Launched : 2016
JSM Communication Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3807
Launched : 2016
Annals of Musculoskeletal Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3599
Launched : 2016
Annals of Virology and Research
ISSN : 2573-1122
Launched : 2014
JSM Renal Medicine
ISSN : 2573-1637
Launched : 2016
Journal of Muscle Health
ISSN : 2578-3823
Launched : 2016
JSM Genetics and Genomics
ISSN : 2334-1823
Launched : 2013
JSM Anxiety and Depression
ISSN : 2475-9139
Launched : 2016
Clinical Journal of Heart Diseases
ISSN : 2641-7766
Launched : 2016
Annals of Medicinal Chemistry and Research
ISSN : 2378-9336
Launched : 2014
JSM Pain and Management
ISSN : 2578-3378
Launched : 2016
JSM Women's Health
ISSN : 2578-3696
Launched : 2016
Clinical Research in HIV or AIDS
ISSN : 2374-0094
Launched : 2013
Journal of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Obesity
ISSN : 2333-6692
Launched : 2013
Journal of Substance Abuse and Alcoholism
ISSN : 2373-9363
Launched : 2013
JSM Neurosurgery and Spine
ISSN : 2373-9479
Launched : 2013
Journal of Liver and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2379-0830
Launched : 2014
Journal of Drug Design and Research
ISSN : 2379-089X
Launched : 2014
JSM Clinical Oncology and Research
ISSN : 2373-938X
Launched : 2013
JSM Bioinformatics, Genomics and Proteomics
ISSN : 2576-1102
Launched : 2014
JSM Chemistry
ISSN : 2334-1831
Launched : 2013
Journal of Trauma and Care
ISSN : 2573-1246
Launched : 2014
JSM Surgical Oncology and Research
ISSN : 2578-3688
Launched : 2016
Annals of Food Processing and Preservation
ISSN : 2573-1033
Launched : 2016
Journal of Radiology and Radiation Therapy
ISSN : 2333-7095
Launched : 2013
JSM Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
ISSN : 2578-3572
Launched : 2016
Annals of Clinical Pathology
ISSN : 2373-9282
Launched : 2013
Annals of Cardiovascular Diseases
ISSN : 2641-7731
Launched : 2016
Journal of Behavior
ISSN : 2576-0076
Launched : 2016
Annals of Clinical and Experimental Metabolism
ISSN : 2572-2492
Launched : 2016
Clinical Research in Infectious Diseases
ISSN : 2379-0636
Launched : 2013
JSM Microbiology
ISSN : 2333-6455
Launched : 2013
Journal of Urology and Research
ISSN : 2379-951X
Launched : 2014
Journal of Family Medicine and Community Health
ISSN : 2379-0547
Launched : 2013
Annals of Pregnancy and Care
ISSN : 2578-336X
Launched : 2017
JSM Cell and Developmental Biology
ISSN : 2379-061X
Launched : 2013
Annals of Aquaculture and Research
ISSN : 2379-0881
Launched : 2014
Clinical Research in Pulmonology
ISSN : 2333-6625
Launched : 2013
Journal of Immunology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2333-6714
Launched : 2013
Annals of Forensic Research and Analysis
ISSN : 2378-9476
Launched : 2014
JSM Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
ISSN : 2333-7109
Launched : 2013
Annals of Breast Cancer Research
ISSN : 2641-7685
Launched : 2016
Annals of Gerontology and Geriatric Research
ISSN : 2378-9409
Launched : 2014
Journal of Sleep Medicine and Disorders
ISSN : 2379-0822
Launched : 2014
JSM Burns and Trauma
ISSN : 2475-9406
Launched : 2016
Chemical Engineering and Process Techniques
ISSN : 2333-6633
Launched : 2013
Annals of Clinical Cytology and Pathology
ISSN : 2475-9430
Launched : 2014
JSM Allergy and Asthma
ISSN : 2573-1254
Launched : 2016
Journal of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
ISSN : 2334-2307
Launched : 2013
Annals of Sports Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2379-0571
Launched : 2014
JSM Sexual Medicine
ISSN : 2578-3718
Launched : 2016
Annals of Vascular Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2378-9344
Launched : 2014
JSM Biotechnology and Biomedical Engineering
ISSN : 2333-7117
Launched : 2013
Journal of Hematology and Transfusion
ISSN : 2333-6684
Launched : 2013
JSM Environmental Science and Ecology
ISSN : 2333-7141
Launched : 2013
Journal of Cardiology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2333-6676
Launched : 2013
JSM Nanotechnology and Nanomedicine
ISSN : 2334-1815
Launched : 2013
Journal of Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders
ISSN : 2475-9473
Launched : 2016
JSM Ophthalmology
ISSN : 2333-6447
Launched : 2013
Journal of Pharmacology and Clinical Toxicology
ISSN : 2333-7079
Launched : 2013
Annals of Psychiatry and Mental Health
ISSN : 2374-0124
Launched : 2013
Medical Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
ISSN : 2333-6439
Launched : 2013
Annals of Pediatrics and Child Health
ISSN : 2373-9312
Launched : 2013
JSM Clinical Pharmaceutics
ISSN : 2379-9498
Launched : 2014
JSM Foot and Ankle
ISSN : 2475-9112
Launched : 2016
JSM Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementia
ISSN : 2378-9565
Launched : 2014
Journal of Addiction Medicine and Therapy
ISSN : 2333-665X
Launched : 2013
Journal of Veterinary Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2378-931X
Launched : 2013
Annals of Public Health and Research
ISSN : 2378-9328
Launched : 2014
Annals of Orthopedics and Rheumatology
ISSN : 2373-9290
Launched : 2013
Annals of Community Medicine and Practice
ISSN : 2475-9465
Launched : 2014
Annals of Biometrics and Biostatistics
ISSN : 2374-0116
Launched : 2013
JSM Clinical Case Reports
ISSN : 2373-9819
Launched : 2013
Journal of Cancer Biology and Research
ISSN : 2373-9436
Launched : 2013
Journal of Surgery and Transplantation Science
ISSN : 2379-0911
Launched : 2013
Journal of Dermatology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2373-9371
Launched : 2013
JSM Gastroenterology and Hepatology
ISSN : 2373-9487
Launched : 2013
Annals of Nursing and Practice
ISSN : 2379-9501
Launched : 2014
JSM Dentistry
ISSN : 2333-7133
Launched : 2013
Author Information X