Loading

Journal of Human Nutrition and Food Science

Evaluation of Fermentation Quality of Nutri Rich Aerobic Rice Genotypes

Research Article | Open Access | Volume 11 | Issue 5

  • 1. Department of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Agricultural Sciences, India
  • 2. Department of Agricultural Microbiology, University of Agricultural Sciences, India
+ Show More - Show Less
Corresponding Authors
Thirumoorthy P, Department of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore -560065, India
Abstract

Fermentation is one of the oldest and economical food processing method to improve digestability of foods. Six nutri rich aerobic rice varieties (HPR565, HPR-801, HPR-814, HPR-930, HPR-1241, HPR-1630) and one check variety (HP-9) which are high in protein (RIL’S) were procured from the, MASLAB, Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, UAS, GKVK, Bengaluru and analyzed for fermentation quality. The milled rice and dehusked black gram dhal (urad dhal) in the ratio of 4:1 (w/w) were washed thoroughly and soaked separately in twice the volume of water for 8 hours at room temperature. They were ground separately and mixed, kept for fermentation at room temperature (28 ?C) for 8 hours. Increases in batter volume, Batter pH, Titrable acidity were assessed as per standard procedures. Range of pH of fresh batter was 5.12 to 6.14 which had decreased to a range of 4.22 to 4.38 after 8 hours fermentation. Similarly pH of check variety also decreased from 6.14 to 4.50. There was significant difference observed in aerobic rice genotypes (p<0.05) with respect to pH variability. The change in pH may be attributed to the concomitant increase in titrable acidity in terms of lactic acid/100ml of substrate. The titrable acidity of freshly ground rice batter ranged from 0.02 to 0.07g increased to a range of 0.19 (HPR 930, HPR 1241 and HPR 1630) to 0.22g (HPR 814) after 8 hours of fermentation. Check variety had an increase from 0.07 to 0.21/100g. The batter volume increased for all samples with maximum rise in HPR 814 (4.93 ml) and HPR 565 (3.03 ml) followed by HPR 930 (1.83 ml). Check variety (HP 9) showed 4.0 ml rise in volume. HPR 565 and HPR 814 and also check variety were found to be better for fermented product preparations such as idly, and dosa etc.

Keywords

Aerobic rice; Fermentation quality; Titrable acidity; Batter volume; Fermented product

CITATION

Thirumoorthy P, Deshpande B, Suvarna VC, Vijayalxmi KG1 (2023) Evaluation of Fermentation Quality of Nutri Rich Aerobic Rice Genotypes. J Hum Nutr Food Sci 11(5): 1176.

INTRODUCTION

Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is a monocotyledon plant belonging to the grass family Poaceae. It is a major staple cereal valued for human food contributing to calories consumption and dietary component for more than one third of the world’s population. India is the largest rice growing country accounting for about 2/3rd of world acreage under rice crop. World production of rice was 745.2 million tonnes with area of 162.4 million hectares [1]. India having a total rice cultivation area of 433.88 lakh hectare with the production of 104.32 million tonnes of rice during the 2015-16 [2]. Rice is consumed primarily in milled or polished form, containing only the starchy endosperm. Dehusked rice is commonly recognized as peasant food and only consumed by the elderly among Asians [3] (Plate 1). In recent times, unpolished rice has been acclaimed as a rich source of important bioactive compounds and nutraceuticals with numerous potential health functions. The major bioactive molecules reported to present in the rice grain include the phenolic acids, polyphenols, oryzanol, tocopherol, tocotrienols and sterols [4]. Asia has the largest population of malnourished people particularly children and therefore the production of rice should keep on par with the population in order to overcome the existing energy gap. Grain quality has become a major concern for domestic consumption and international rice trade. Consumer preferences include grain appearance, size and shape, better milling, cooking behavior, taste, tenderness, and cooked rice flavour. Preferences for cooking quality vary across different countries around the world. Varietal enhancement is therefore the most economical way to improve the quality of grain without affecting the output. Increasing water scarcity and competition for the same water from non-agricultural sectors, as the CGIAR (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) Challenge Program on Water and Food puts it; there is an urgent need to improve crop water productivity to ensure adequate food for future generations with the same or less water available to agriculture. Aerobic rice, the term given by Bouman [5], is high yield rice grown in unpuddled, unflooded, aerobic (unsaturated) soil (i.e., oxygen soil) under irrigation and in areas with dwindling water supply. It is considered as environment friendly method as it does not produce methane and also less labor intensive.

Aerobic rice has more balanced amino-acid profile. Highprotein rice has the potential to enhance nutrition in poor rural families where rice serves as the staple food [6]. Enrichment of protein in rice would have a positive impact to enhance the protein availability which is essential to combat protein energy malnutrition and hidden hunger which is still continues to be major health burden in developing countries. Researchers have been trying to boost the protein content in rice for five decades through plant breeding interventions by evolving high protein rice genotypes. Total grain protein (TGP) content is the prime most important parameter in rice quality production. TGP is complex trait controlled by several genes which is interrelated to grain yield. Hence long term research of breeding attempts on segregating generations with protein rich local landrace parents with popular local rice variety to boost the total protein content under aerobic situation was carried out in the Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, UAS,GKVK, Bengaluru. The protein content was found to increase around 4.5 per cent from present cultivating varieties without affecting the regular yield as much of BPT 5204 along with medium to fine quality grains containing moderate to higher content of micronutrients (iron and zinc) in the developed Recombinant Inbred Lines(RIL’S). Such research outputs lead to high quality grain production to reach the needy population.

Rice is considered as divine food in India with socio cultural sentiments but when consumed principally as a whole grain, the texture and flavor plays important role. Consumer preference of rice varieties is mainly based on grain and cooking qualities. The grain quality depends on its physicochemical characteristics such as milling efficiency, percentage head rice yield, broken percentage, chalkiness of endosperm, dimensional properties of grain etc. The economic value of rice depends on its cooking quality such as water uptake ratio, grain elongation ratio, percent curled grains and cooking time. Rice protein is superior in lysine content to wheat, corn and sorghum [7]. Fermented cereals have been noted for their superior nutritional value, shelf-life and digestibility compared to the unfermented counterpart [8]. Use of rice along with pulses (black gram, bengal gram) is necessary as a source of mixed natural microflora needed for efficient fermentation during preparation of idli, dosa, dhokla batters. A group of microbes (natural or from starter culture) grow well in cereal based foods, biochemically and organoleptically transform the substrates, produce different metabolites, destroys or detoxifies the harmful products (phytates, tannins, and polyphenols) and enrich the food with different micro-nutrients (vitamins, minerals, amino acids, etc.), health beneficial edible microbes (i.e. probiotics), fermentable sugars (i.e. prebiotic), dietary fibers, phytochemicals and digestive enzymes. . Rice, being the most dominant cereal crop in most of the countries can improve the health condition of millions of people who consume it.

Thus, information on the nutritional aspect and sensory features of various aerobic rice varieties (genotypes) help to recognize suitable varieties for table purposes or preparation of food products for consumer preference. There is a need to assess the quality of these nutri rich aerobic rice varieties in comparison with the released check variety HP-9 (Paustic-9) with respect. Hence, the study was undertaken with the following objective. Evaluation of fermentation quality and develop food products from nutri rich aerobic rice genotypes.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study deals with the details of the materials and methods used to accomplish the research topic entitled “evaluation of fermentation quality of nutri rich aerobic rice genotypes” in the Department of Food Science and Nutrition, Gandhi Krishi Vignana Kendra, UAS, Bengaluru, during 2017-2019.

Batter Fermentation Quality

Preparation of rice batter: The milled rice and dehusked black gram dhal (urad dhal) in the ratio of 4:1 (w/w) were washed thoroughly and soaked separately in twice the volume of water for 8 hours at room temperature. They were ground separately in an electrical mixer, black gram dhal being ground to a fine paste and rice ground to a coarse consistency. Afterwards both ingredients were mixed. The batter was then transferred to a glass tube, covered with a lid and fermented at room temperature (28? C) for 8 hours [9].

Analysis of rice batter

Increases in batter volume: Prepared rice batter (20 ml) was transferred to a glass tube covered with a lid and fermented at room temperature (28? C) for 8 hours. Difference in batter before and after fermentation were determined as increase in batter volume [10].

Batter pH: The pH of the batter sample was measured before and after fermentation using digital pH meter (Digital pH meter type MK-VI). Standard buffer solutions of pH 4.0 and 7.0 were used to calibrate the instrument.

Titrable acidity: Known amount of batter sample (5ml) was taken in a 100 ml beaker, kept in boiling water bath at 70°C, cooled and titrated against 0.1 N NaOH using 2 drops of phenolphthalein indicator. Appearance of light pink colour indicates the end point. Total titrable acidity was expressed in terms of lactic acid per 100 ml of substrate [11].

Development of food products: Rice varieties namely HPR565, HPR-801, HPR- 814, HPR-930, HPR-1241 and HPR-1630 were utilized for development of food products Dosa and Idly. The HP-9(Check variety) rice variety served as a control. The grain of the eight rice varieties were cleaned and made free of dust, dirt and foreign materials prior to development of food products.

Organoleptic evaluation of the developed food products: All the food products were subjected to sensory evaluation with respect to colour, appearance, aroma, texture, taste and overall acceptability by a semi-trained taste panel comprising of 10 judges using the 9-point Hedonic Rating scale. Based on mean scores of sensory evaluation obtained after feeding to the judges, the most acceptable products were selected for further studies.

Statistical Analysis 

Results were expressed as mean ± SEM (standard error mean) and as data analysis were carried out using the statistical package for social science (SPSS) (Version 17.0 for windows, SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA). The statistical method used was student’s t-test (two tailed) and analysis of variance (ANOVA) analysis. Difference was considered significant at a probability level of 5 percent or 1 percent.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Batter fermentation quality characteristics of nutri rich aerobic rice genotypes

As the rice is main ingredient for most of the fermented dietary products of south India, it was of interest to study the fermentation efficiency of rice genotypes. The prepared aerobic rice batter was studied for fermentation quality for 8 hours duration assessing the parameter such as rise in batter volume, pH and titrable acidity as depicted in Table 1.

Table 1: Batter fermentation quality of nutri rich aerobic rice genotypes after 8 hours

Rice Genotypes

Batter volume (ml)

Increase in batter volume (ml)

pH

Titrable acidity (gram in terms of lactic acid/100ml substrate)

Initial

Final

Initial

Final

Initial

Final

HPR 565

20

23.03±0.05c

3.03

5.62±0.01b

4.22±0.02d

0.06±0b

0.20±0c

HPR 801

20

21.50±0.5d

1.50

5.61±0.01b

4.31±0c

0.05±0c

0.20±0d

HPR 814

20

24.93±0.60a

4.93

5.62±0b

4.38±0.02b

0.06±0b

0.22±0a

HPR 930

20

21.83±0.28d

1.83

5.61±0.01b

4.32±0.01c

0.05±0c

0.19±0d

HPR 1241

20

21.23±0.40d

1.23

5.61±0.01b

4.32±0.02c

0.07±0a

0.19±0d

HPR 1630

20

21.76±0.25d

1.76

5.12±0.01c

4.23±0.02d

0.02±0d

0.19±0d

HP 9

20

24.00±0.5b

4.00

6.14±0.01a

4.50±0.01a

0.07±0a

0.21±0b

Mean

20

22.61

2.61

5.62

4.32

0.05

0.20

F value

-

*

-

*

*

*

*

SEm±

-

0.23

-

0.007

0.01

0.001

0.001

CD @ 5%

-

0.71

-

0.028

0.03

0.003

0.005

* Significant (p<0.05) NS – Non-significant    HP 9 – Check variety

Means in the same column followed by different superscript letters differ significantly.

Hence, all the rice genotypes mixed with black gram (4:1 proportion) soaked and ground to batter to prepare batter and further analysed for fermentation quality.

The batter volume increased for all the samples during fermentation over a period of 8 hours [Figure 2]. Maximum rise in batter volume was found in HPR 814 (4.93 ml) and HPR 565 (3.03 ml) followed by HPR 930 (1.83 ml), HPR 1630 (1.76 ml), HPR 801 (1.50 ml) and least was in HPR 1241 (1.23 ml). Check variety (HP 9) showed 4.0 ml rise in volume. It can be concluded by findings that two experimental varieties (HPR 565 and HPR 814) and also check variety were better for fermented product preparations such as idli, dosa and ediappam etc.

Range of pH of fresh batter was 5.12 to 6.14 which had decreased to a range of 4.22 to 4.38 after 8 hours fermentation. Similarly pH of check variety also decreased from 6.14 to 4.50. There was significant difference observed in aerobic rice genotypes (p<0.05), with respect to pH variability. The change in pH may be attributed to the concomitant increase in titrable acidity in terms of lactic acid/100ml of substrate.

The titrable acidity of freshly ground rice batter ranged from 0.02 to 0.07g increased to a range of 0.19 (HPR 930, HPR 1241 and HPR 1630) to 0.22g (HPR 814). Check variety had an increase from 0.07 to 0.21/100g after 8 hours of fermentation [12], reported that with utilization of sugars during fermentation duration, organic acids were produced which might also have contributed to the increase in acidity. Similar study was reported by [13]. The pH and percentage of titrable acidity of batter during fermentation for different blend ratio (rice and black gram) ranged between 4.21 to 5.9 and 0.44 to 0.91 respectively. There was an increasing trend of titrable acidity level as the pH value was decreasing. This is mainly associated with development of Streptococcus faecalis producing lactic acid which reduces the pH and production of carbon dioxide which leavens the batter [14].

Black gram soaked in water has more concentration of soluble nutrients to support the growth of lactic acid bacteria. The role of lactic acid bacteria is to reduce the pH of batter to an optimum level (4.4 to 4.5) for yeast activity [15]. The study revealed that HPR 814, HPR 565 and check variety are having good fermentation quality and suitable for fermented rice based products.

Product development and their organoleptic evaluation

All the seven rice varieties HPR-565, HPR-801, HPR- 814, HPR930, HPR-1241, HPR-1630 and HP-9(Check variety) were used for the preparation of food product Idli and Dosa and subjected to sensory evaluation with respect to colour, appearance, aroma, texture, taste and overall acceptability

Idli: The data in Table 2 indicated that Dosa prepared from seven different rice varieties namely check variety (HP 9) Dosa, HPR-565 Idli and HPR-814 idli were fall in the category of “liked very much” in overall acceptability whereas the aroma of control idli was “liked moderately” and taste of HPR-814 idli was “liked slightly:” by panel of experts.

Table 2: Organoleptic acceptability of Idli prepared from different rice varieties

Variety

Colour

Appearance

Aroma

Texture

Taste

Overall Acceptability

HPR 565

8.40±0.27

8.00±0.24

8.80±0.23

7.95±0.36

7.70±0.35

8.86±0.35

HPR 801

7.90±0.23

7.30 ±0.16

7.50±0.21

7.30±0.26

7.50±0.32

7.76±0.22

HPR 814

8.70±0.27

8.12±0.33

8.16±0.26

8.40±0.32

7.20±0.37

8.52±0.25

HPR 930

7.70±0.24

7.90±0.25

7.50±0.25

7.20±0.12

7.40±0.16

7.88±0.16

HPR 1241

7.30±0.19

7.70±0.23

7.90±0.24

7.20±0.21

7.90±0.22

7.60±0.28

HPR 1630

7.50±0.15

7.30±0.24

7.70±0.36

7.90±0.28

7.96±0.25

7.46±0.15

Check variety HP 9

8.10±0.1

7.90±0.22

7.80±0.13

7.90±0.3

8.18±0.15

8.50±0.23

CD(P<0.05)

0.89

0.79

0.76

0.73

0.68

0.78

Values are mean ± SE of three independent determinations

Mean scores of idli prepared using different rice varieties HPR-865, HPR-814 and HP-9 showed that the colour, appearance of control, taste texture and overall acceptability idli was liked very much, whereas control idli was liked moderately in terms of appearance, aroma, and texture, and taste by the judges.

Mean scores of idli prepared using HPR-801, HPR-930, HPR1241; rice variety showed that the aroma, texture and taste was liked moderately, whereas HPR-930 dosa was liked slightly in taste by the judges. The results obtained from organoleptice evaluation revealed that the mean organoleptic scores of idli are comparable with ranges reported earlier by Beniwal [16,17].

Dosa: The data in Table 3 indicated that Dosa prepared from seven different rice varieties namely check variety (HP 9) Dosa, HPR-565 Dosa and HPR-814 Dosa were fall in the category of “liked very much” in overall acceptability whereas the aroma of control Dosa was “liked moderately” and taste of HPR-814 Dosa was “liked slightly:” by panel of experts.

Table 3: Organoleptic acceptability of Dosa prepared from different rice varieties

Variety

Colour

Appearance

Aroma

Texture

Taste

Overall Acceptability

HPR 565

8.50±0.27

8.00±0.24

7.80±0.23

7.90±0.36

7.90±0.35

8.86±0.35

HPR 801

7.50±0.23

7.20±0.16

7.30±0.21

7.20±0.26

7.30±0.32

7.56±0.22

HPR 814

8.70±0.27

8.12±0.33

7.86±0.26

8.50±0.32

7.90±0.37

8.52±0.25

HPR 930

7.60±0.24

7.30±0.25

7.40±0.25

7.10±0.12

6.40±0.16

7.08±0.16

HPR 1241

7.60±0.19

7.80±0.23

7.70±0.24

7.50±0.21

7.80±0.22

7.70±0.28

HPR 1630

7.20±0.15

7.20±0.24

7.40±0.36

7.30±0.28

7.36±0.25

7.36±0.15

Check variety HP 9

8.10±0.1

7.80±0.22

7.80±0.13

7.90±0.3

8.18±0.15

8.50±0.23

CD(P<0.05)

0.87

0.76

0.78

0.74

0.62

0.78

Values are mean ± SE of three independent determinations

Mean scores of dosa prepared using different rice varieties showed that the aroma of control dosa was liked very much, whereas control dosa was liked moderately in terms of colour, appearance, texture, taste and overall acceptability by the judges. The acceptability scores of dosa prepared from HPR-865 and HPR-814 rice varieties were liked very much in terms of colour, appearance, aroma, texture, taste and overall acceptability by the judges.

Mean scores of dosa prepared using HPR-801, HPR-930, HPR-1241, rice variety showed that the aroma, texture and taste was liked moderately, whereas HPR-930 dosa was liked slightly in taste by the judges. The results obtained from organoleptic evaluation revealed that the mean organoleptic scores of dosa are comparable with ranges reported earlier by Beniwal [16].

CONCLUSION

The batter volume increased for all the samples during fermentation over a period of 8 hours. Maximum rise in batter volume was found in HPR 814 (4.93 ml) and HPR 565 (3.03 ml) followed by HPR 930 (1.83 ml). Check variety (HP 9) showed 4.0 ml rise in volume. HPR 565 and HPR 814 and check variety were found to be better for fermented product preparations such as idli, dosa and ediappam etc. Development and consumption of Food products using such varieties can go a long way in improving the nutritional status of the population especially for those suffering from Protein Energy Malnutrition.

REFERENCES
  1. Rice market monitoring. FAO. 2015; Volume XVII: Issue No 2.
  2. Annual Report 2016-2017. Department of Agriculture, Cooperation &Farmers Welfare, Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, Govt. of India. Anonymous. 2017.
  3. Dipti S, Bergman C, Indrasari SD, Herath T, Hall R, Lee H, et al. The potential of rice to offer solutions for malnutrition and chronic diseases. Rice (N Y). 2012; 5: 1939-8433.
  4. Kiing S, Rajan PY, Wong S. Effect of germination on oryzanol content of selected Sarawak rice cultivars. Am J Appl Sci. 2009; 6: 1658-1661.
  5. Bouman. Water-wise rice production. Los Baños (Philippines): Int Rice Res. Institute. 2002; 356.
  6. Li J, Xiao J, Grandillo S, Jiang L, Wan Y, Deng Q, et al. QTL detection for rice grain quality traits using an interspecific backcross population derived from cultivated Asian (O. sativa L.) and African (O. glaberrima S.) rice. Genome. 2004; 47: 697-704.
  7. Hegested DM. Nutritional value of cereal proteins in relation tohuman needs. 1969; 44: 38-48.
  8. Coda R, Rizzello CG, Trani A, Gobbetti M. Manufacture and characterization of functional emmer beverages fermented by selected lactic acid bacteria. Food Microbiol. 2011; 28: 526–536.
  9. Kannan D, Chelliah R, Vinolya Rajamanickam E, Srinivasan Venkatraman R, Antony U. Fermented batter characteristics in relation with the sensory properties of Idli. J. of Food Technol. Biotechnol and Nutr. 2015; 10: 37-43.
  10. Kanchana S, Bharathi SL, Ilamaran M, Singaravadivel K. Physical quality of selected rice varieties. World J Agric Sci. 2012; 8: 468-472.
  11. Srivastava RP, Kumar S. Important methods for analysis of fruits/ vegetable and their products. Fruit Veg Pres Prin Prac. 1993; 2: 321- 229.
  12. Sura K, Sarg S, Garg FC. Microbiological and biochemical changes during fermentation of kanji. J Food Sci Technol. 2001; 38: 165-167.
  13. Ghosh D, Chattopadhyay P. Preparation of idli batter, its properties and nutritional improvement during fermentation. J Food Sci Technol. 2011; 48: 610-615.
  14. Mukherjee SK, Albury MN, Pederson CS, Van AG, Steinkraus KH.Role of Leuconostoc mesenteroides in leavening the batter of idli, a fermented food of India. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1965; 13: 227-231.
  15. Soni SK, Sandhu DK. Indian fermented foods: Microbiological and biochemical aspects. Indian J Microbiol. 1990; 30: 135-157.
  16. Beniwal P. Nutritive evaluation and Glycaemic response of value added products developed from by-products of milled Bengal gram. Ph.D Thesis. CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana, India. 2013.
  17. Deshmukh GP, Pawar PP. Optimization of formulation and development of carrot fortified Idli and its physic-chemical characterization. International Journal of Engineering Science and Research Technology. 2016; 5: 783-786.

Thirumoorthy P, Deshpande B, Suvarna VC, Vijayalxmi KG1 (2023) Evaluation of Fermentation Quality of Nutri Rich Aerobic Rice Genotypes. J Hum Nutr Food Sci 11(5): 1176.

Received : 27 Nov 2023
Accepted : 27 Dec 2023
Published : 29 Dec 2023
Journals
Annals of Otolaryngology and Rhinology
ISSN : 2379-948X
Launched : 2014
JSM Schizophrenia
Launched : 2016
Journal of Nausea
Launched : 2020
JSM Internal Medicine
Launched : 2016
JSM Hepatitis
Launched : 2016
JSM Oro Facial Surgeries
ISSN : 2578-3211
Launched : 2016
JSM Regenerative Medicine and Bioengineering
ISSN : 2379-0490
Launched : 2013
JSM Spine
ISSN : 2578-3181
Launched : 2016
Archives of Palliative Care
ISSN : 2573-1165
Launched : 2016
JSM Nutritional Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3203
Launched : 2017
Annals of Neurodegenerative Disorders
ISSN : 2476-2032
Launched : 2016
Journal of Fever
ISSN : 2641-7782
Launched : 2017
JSM Bone Marrow Research
ISSN : 2578-3351
Launched : 2016
JSM Mathematics and Statistics
ISSN : 2578-3173
Launched : 2014
Journal of Autoimmunity and Research
ISSN : 2573-1173
Launched : 2014
JSM Arthritis
ISSN : 2475-9155
Launched : 2016
JSM Head and Neck Cancer-Cases and Reviews
ISSN : 2573-1610
Launched : 2016
JSM General Surgery Cases and Images
ISSN : 2573-1564
Launched : 2016
JSM Anatomy and Physiology
ISSN : 2573-1262
Launched : 2016
JSM Dental Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1548
Launched : 2016
Annals of Emergency Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1017
Launched : 2016
Annals of Mens Health and Wellness
ISSN : 2641-7707
Launched : 2017
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Health Care
ISSN : 2576-0084
Launched : 2018
Journal of Chronic Diseases and Management
ISSN : 2573-1300
Launched : 2016
Annals of Vaccines and Immunization
ISSN : 2378-9379
Launched : 2014
JSM Heart Surgery Cases and Images
ISSN : 2578-3157
Launched : 2016
Annals of Reproductive Medicine and Treatment
ISSN : 2573-1092
Launched : 2016
JSM Brain Science
ISSN : 2573-1289
Launched : 2016
JSM Biomarkers
ISSN : 2578-3815
Launched : 2014
JSM Biology
ISSN : 2475-9392
Launched : 2016
Archives of Stem Cell and Research
ISSN : 2578-3580
Launched : 2014
Annals of Clinical and Medical Microbiology
ISSN : 2578-3629
Launched : 2014
JSM Pediatric Surgery
ISSN : 2578-3149
Launched : 2017
Journal of Memory Disorder and Rehabilitation
ISSN : 2578-319X
Launched : 2016
JSM Tropical Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2578-3165
Launched : 2016
JSM Head and Face Medicine
ISSN : 2578-3793
Launched : 2016
JSM Cardiothoracic Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1297
Launched : 2016
JSM Bone and Joint Diseases
ISSN : 2578-3351
Launched : 2017
JSM Bioavailability and Bioequivalence
ISSN : 2641-7812
Launched : 2017
JSM Atherosclerosis
ISSN : 2573-1270
Launched : 2016
Journal of Genitourinary Disorders
ISSN : 2641-7790
Launched : 2017
Journal of Fractures and Sprains
ISSN : 2578-3831
Launched : 2016
Journal of Autism and Epilepsy
ISSN : 2641-7774
Launched : 2016
Annals of Marine Biology and Research
ISSN : 2573-105X
Launched : 2014
JSM Health Education & Primary Health Care
ISSN : 2578-3777
Launched : 2016
JSM Communication Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3807
Launched : 2016
Annals of Musculoskeletal Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3599
Launched : 2016
Annals of Virology and Research
ISSN : 2573-1122
Launched : 2014
JSM Renal Medicine
ISSN : 2573-1637
Launched : 2016
Journal of Muscle Health
ISSN : 2578-3823
Launched : 2016
JSM Genetics and Genomics
ISSN : 2334-1823
Launched : 2013
JSM Anxiety and Depression
ISSN : 2475-9139
Launched : 2016
Clinical Journal of Heart Diseases
ISSN : 2641-7766
Launched : 2016
Annals of Medicinal Chemistry and Research
ISSN : 2378-9336
Launched : 2014
JSM Pain and Management
ISSN : 2578-3378
Launched : 2016
JSM Women's Health
ISSN : 2578-3696
Launched : 2016
Clinical Research in HIV or AIDS
ISSN : 2374-0094
Launched : 2013
Journal of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Obesity
ISSN : 2333-6692
Launched : 2013
Journal of Substance Abuse and Alcoholism
ISSN : 2373-9363
Launched : 2013
JSM Neurosurgery and Spine
ISSN : 2373-9479
Launched : 2013
Journal of Liver and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2379-0830
Launched : 2014
Journal of Drug Design and Research
ISSN : 2379-089X
Launched : 2014
JSM Clinical Oncology and Research
ISSN : 2373-938X
Launched : 2013
JSM Bioinformatics, Genomics and Proteomics
ISSN : 2576-1102
Launched : 2014
JSM Chemistry
ISSN : 2334-1831
Launched : 2013
Journal of Trauma and Care
ISSN : 2573-1246
Launched : 2014
JSM Surgical Oncology and Research
ISSN : 2578-3688
Launched : 2016
Annals of Food Processing and Preservation
ISSN : 2573-1033
Launched : 2016
Journal of Radiology and Radiation Therapy
ISSN : 2333-7095
Launched : 2013
JSM Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
ISSN : 2578-3572
Launched : 2016
Annals of Clinical Pathology
ISSN : 2373-9282
Launched : 2013
Annals of Cardiovascular Diseases
ISSN : 2641-7731
Launched : 2016
Journal of Behavior
ISSN : 2576-0076
Launched : 2016
Annals of Clinical and Experimental Metabolism
ISSN : 2572-2492
Launched : 2016
Clinical Research in Infectious Diseases
ISSN : 2379-0636
Launched : 2013
JSM Microbiology
ISSN : 2333-6455
Launched : 2013
Journal of Urology and Research
ISSN : 2379-951X
Launched : 2014
Journal of Family Medicine and Community Health
ISSN : 2379-0547
Launched : 2013
Annals of Pregnancy and Care
ISSN : 2578-336X
Launched : 2017
JSM Cell and Developmental Biology
ISSN : 2379-061X
Launched : 2013
Annals of Aquaculture and Research
ISSN : 2379-0881
Launched : 2014
Clinical Research in Pulmonology
ISSN : 2333-6625
Launched : 2013
Journal of Immunology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2333-6714
Launched : 2013
Annals of Forensic Research and Analysis
ISSN : 2378-9476
Launched : 2014
JSM Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
ISSN : 2333-7109
Launched : 2013
Annals of Breast Cancer Research
ISSN : 2641-7685
Launched : 2016
Annals of Gerontology and Geriatric Research
ISSN : 2378-9409
Launched : 2014
Journal of Sleep Medicine and Disorders
ISSN : 2379-0822
Launched : 2014
JSM Burns and Trauma
ISSN : 2475-9406
Launched : 2016
Chemical Engineering and Process Techniques
ISSN : 2333-6633
Launched : 2013
Annals of Clinical Cytology and Pathology
ISSN : 2475-9430
Launched : 2014
JSM Allergy and Asthma
ISSN : 2573-1254
Launched : 2016
Journal of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
ISSN : 2334-2307
Launched : 2013
Annals of Sports Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2379-0571
Launched : 2014
JSM Sexual Medicine
ISSN : 2578-3718
Launched : 2016
Annals of Vascular Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2378-9344
Launched : 2014
JSM Biotechnology and Biomedical Engineering
ISSN : 2333-7117
Launched : 2013
Journal of Hematology and Transfusion
ISSN : 2333-6684
Launched : 2013
JSM Environmental Science and Ecology
ISSN : 2333-7141
Launched : 2013
Journal of Cardiology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2333-6676
Launched : 2013
JSM Nanotechnology and Nanomedicine
ISSN : 2334-1815
Launched : 2013
Journal of Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders
ISSN : 2475-9473
Launched : 2016
JSM Ophthalmology
ISSN : 2333-6447
Launched : 2013
Journal of Pharmacology and Clinical Toxicology
ISSN : 2333-7079
Launched : 2013
Annals of Psychiatry and Mental Health
ISSN : 2374-0124
Launched : 2013
Medical Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
ISSN : 2333-6439
Launched : 2013
Annals of Pediatrics and Child Health
ISSN : 2373-9312
Launched : 2013
JSM Clinical Pharmaceutics
ISSN : 2379-9498
Launched : 2014
JSM Foot and Ankle
ISSN : 2475-9112
Launched : 2016
JSM Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementia
ISSN : 2378-9565
Launched : 2014
Journal of Addiction Medicine and Therapy
ISSN : 2333-665X
Launched : 2013
Journal of Veterinary Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2378-931X
Launched : 2013
Annals of Public Health and Research
ISSN : 2378-9328
Launched : 2014
Annals of Orthopedics and Rheumatology
ISSN : 2373-9290
Launched : 2013
Journal of Clinical Nephrology and Research
ISSN : 2379-0652
Launched : 2014
Annals of Community Medicine and Practice
ISSN : 2475-9465
Launched : 2014
Annals of Biometrics and Biostatistics
ISSN : 2374-0116
Launched : 2013
JSM Clinical Case Reports
ISSN : 2373-9819
Launched : 2013
Journal of Cancer Biology and Research
ISSN : 2373-9436
Launched : 2013
Journal of Surgery and Transplantation Science
ISSN : 2379-0911
Launched : 2013
Journal of Dermatology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2373-9371
Launched : 2013
JSM Gastroenterology and Hepatology
ISSN : 2373-9487
Launched : 2013
Annals of Nursing and Practice
ISSN : 2379-9501
Launched : 2014
JSM Dentistry
ISSN : 2333-7133
Launched : 2013
Author Information X