Loading

Journal of Human Nutrition and Food Science

Evaluation of the Engineering Properties of Two Varieties of African Yam Bean (Sphenostylis stenocarpa) Seeds

Review Article | Open Access | Volume 6 | Issue 1

  • 1. Department of Food Technology, Federal Polytechnic Nekede, Nigeria
  • 2. Department of Food Science and Technology, Michael Okpara University of Agriculture, Nigeria
+ Show More - Show Less
Corresponding Authors
Ohaegbulam PO, Department of Food Technology, Federal Polytechnic Nekede, Owerri, Imo State, Nigeria, Tel: 8069333945
Abstract

The aim of this work was to evaluate the engineering properties of two selected varieties of African yam bean (Sphenostylis stenocarpa) seeds – The brown-coated and white testa seed varieties. Physical dimensions (length, width, thickness, weight, volume, amongst other parameters) of the selected test seeds were measured using appropriate devices. Established mathematical formulae were used in the computation of the data generated to deduce several relevant engineering properties of the seeds. The values derived for all parameters are presented in this work. From the results obtained, the mean values for length, width and thickness (all in mm) were generally lower for the white variety than for the brown variety. The average arithmetic and geometric mean diameter values further confirmed this, as was evident from the bigger sizes of the brown seeds compared to the white species. The mean sphericity values for both seeds implied that both seeds were closer to a sphere in shape, though the white seed type had a higher tendency to roll when placed at a particular orientation to improve emptying (as in hopper or conveyor belt/inclined plane platforms). The specific surface and mean surface areas suggested that both seed varieties would fall through a stream of air at the right velocity while lighter/irregularly-shaped chaff/extraneous matter are blown away during pneumatic separation (such as aspiration/winnowing processes) or remain on the belt during pneumatic conveyance. The mean values for volume, bulk density solid density, 1,000- seed mass, unit mass and porosity values indicated that the seeds will not float in water and these values would help to separate unwanted particles from the seeds during wet cleaning on the basis of buoyancy differences. Though, more seeds of the white variety would occupy the same space than the seeds with brown seed coat. The values of angle of repose suggested that the seeds would readily form heaps during collection/packaging and flow out readily during emptying of the holding vessel. The coefficient of static friction on various surfaces (plywood, glass, stainless steel, aluminium, planed wood surface and formica) was indicative of the trend of increased resistance to sliding of the bulk seeds when placed on the respective surfaces. This would be useful in the design of conveying devices like raw materials’ reception plane, processing machine hoppers or agricultural machine (planter) hoppers. All the values generated may be exploited in the design and fabrication of equipment to manage, convey, process, contain or preserve African Yam bean seeds.

Keywords

•    African yam bean
•    Engineering properties
•    Coefficient of friction
•    Angle of repose

Citation

Ohaegbulam PO, Okorie SU, Ojinnaka MC (2017) Evaluation of the Engineering Properties of Two Varieties of African Yam Bean (Sphenostylis stenocarpa) Seeds. J Hum Nutr Food Sci 6(1): 11158.

INTRODUCTION

African yam bean (Sphenostylis stenocarpa) is an herbaceous leguminous plant occurring throughout tropical Africa, which is often cited among the lesser-known and under-exploited species [1]. It is a grain legume which is a good source of protein and energy cultivated in South-Eastern Nigeria for its edible seeds, but cultivated in Central African Republic, Zaire, East Africa and Ethiopia for its tubers. In areas where it is grown for its seeds, African yam bean has become an important substitute for the more widely-eaten cowpea [2]. Like cowpea, the seeds are contained in a pod, with each pod containing between ten and thirty seeds. The seeds of the African yam bean have brown, black, white, grey or speckled bean-shaped appearance [3].

Being cheaper in cost than animal products such as meat, fish, poultry and egg; legumes (of which African yam bean is a part) are eaten especially in the developing or poor countries where the consumption of animal protein may be limited as a result of social, economic, cultural or religious factors [4].

There is a general tendency to effect the mechanization of agricultural and food production operations because of steadily rising labor costs (due to the aging population of rural farmers, rural-urban migration, etc), shortage in hand labor and to save time and efforts [5]. However, the knowledge of various physical, mechanical, engineering and chemical properties (as the case may be) of agricultural products are very essential to the design of suitable machines and equipment for the handling, processing and storage of these products. For instance, size and shape of the materials are essential in sizing, sorting and other separation processes. Bulk and true densities of the materials are important in order to design equipment for its processing, sorting, grading, transporting and storage. Its angle of repose is important for designing packages or storage structures and the coefficient of friction plays an essential role for transportation, handling and storage structures [6].

The knowledge of these physical and mechanical properties constitutes vital and essential engineering data in the design of machines, storage structures, processing and for the purpose of quality control. This basic information is not only important to food engineers, but it is also useful to those who may exploit these properties and find new uses for the plant material [7].

In South-Eastern Nigeria, the consumption of African yam bean seeds is restricted to the harvesting period, after which their availability in the rural market becomes scarce, as they are not cultivated in large quantities and their uses are limited [8]. This trend is not unconnected with the fact that there is hardly any food processor of African yam bean that possesses mechanized equipment for its harvesting, handling or processing. Most subsistence/small-scale producers perform the key operations manually which yields a product with poor quality and low nutrient. The design and fabrication of mechanical systems and associated equipment for handling, harvesting, processing, moving and storing the African yam bean seeds would be predicated on the determination of the engineering properties of the seeds. The data so generated there from, considering the fact that few researchers have worked on this study area, would be handy to overcome some of the handicaps which may be faced in the fabrication process of processing equipment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Material selection

Source of materials: The mature seeds of the white- and brown-colored African yam bean were sourced from Isiukwuato in Abia State, Nigeria.

Preparation of sample: The samples were prepared using the modified methods described by [9] and [3]. The African yam bean seeds were cleaned manually to remove all foreign matters such as dust, dirt, stones and chaff, as well as immature and broken seeds, after which they were kept in covered containers for subsequent analysis.

Determination of moisture content: The method adopted by [3] was used. Samples were randomly selected to determine the moisture content by oven-drying 100g of each sample at 130°C for 6h. The samples were then cooled in desiccators and weighed using an electronic top-loading weighing balance (Atom Model110°C) reading to 0.01g in order to determine the moisture loss. The measurement on each sample was triplicate and the average moisture content was obtained. The moisture content of the seed in % (dry basis) was calculated using the formula:

 

Where Ms = Moisture content in % dry basis, M = Mass (g), and Subscripts s, i and f represent seeds, initial and final respectively.

The following methods were used in the determination of some selected engineering properties of the African yam bean seeds (Figure 1 & 2).

White and brown seeds of African yam bean (AYB)

Figure 1: White and brown seeds of African yam bean (AYB)

Demonstrating ?e with the fabricated box apparatus..

Figure 2: Demonstrating ?e with the fabricated box apparatus..

Size and shape analyses

(i) Geometric mean diameter (Dg)

The method of [9] was used. A vernier caliper was used to measure the axial dimensions of 100 randomly-selected seeds; length, width and thickness. From the average of axial dimensions, the geometric mean diameter (Dg) in mm was determined using the formula below:

D_{g}=\left ( abc \right )^{1/3}

Where a = Length dimension along the longest axis (mm)

b = Width dimension along the longest axis perpendicular to a (mm),

c = Thickness dimension along the longest axis perpendicular to a and b (mm). 

This was determined mathematically using the formula as described by Adebowale et al. (2012):

Da=\frac{L+W+T}{3}

Where L = length, W = width and T = thickness

(iii) Volume (V)

This was calculated using the mathematical relationship of [10].

V=\frac{\pi BL^{2}}{6\left ( 2L-B \right )}

Where π =3.142, L = Length (mm), T = Thickness (mm), B = (WT) 0.5, W = Width (mm)

(iv) Sphericity (φ)

This was determined mathematically based on the mathematical relationship used by [11].

\varphi =\frac{D_{g}}{L}             

Where φ = Degree of sphericity, Dg = Geometric mean diameter, L = Length (mm), W = Width (mm), T = Thickness (mm).

Thousand-seed weight: The method by [9] was adopted. Thousand-seed weight (TSW) was measured by counting 100 seeds and weighing them with the aid of an electronic top-loading weighing balance to an accuracy of 0.01g. The resulting value was multiplied by 10 to give the mass of 1,000 seeds.

Surface Area (S): This was determined mathematically according to the formula used by [6].

S=\pi \left ( Dg \right )^{2}

Where π = 3.142, Dg = Geometric mean diameter

Specific Surface area (Ss): This was calculated using the mathematical relationship by [3].

Ss=\frac{Sl_{b}}{Ms}

Where Ss = Specific surface area of seed (mm2 /cm3 ), S = Surface area (mm2 ), lb = Bulk density (g/cm3 ), Ms = Mass of unit seed (g)

Bulk Density and Solid Density: The value of Bulk density was obtained according to the method described by [9], while the Solid density was determined according to the method described by [3].

(i) Bulk Density (ρb)

A weighed empty 250mL graduated cylinder was filled with the seeds and weighed. The weight of the seeds was obtained by subtracting the weight of the cylinder from the weight of the cylinder and seeds. To achieve uniformity in bulk density values, the graduated cylinder was tapped 10 times on the workbench for the seeds to consolidate. The volume occupied was then noted. The process was replicated three (3) times and the bulk density for each replication was calculated from the following relationship:

pb=\frac{Ws}{Vs}

Where ρb = Bulk density (Kg/m3 ), Ws = Weight of the sample (Kg), Vs = Volume occupied by the sample (m3 ).

(ii) Solid Density (ρs)

The Solid density was calculated by dividing the mass of the individual seed by its volume. The mass of the individual seed was measured and recorded. The volume of the individual seeds was determined by water displacement method as follows:

V=\frac{Ms}{pw}

Where Ms = Mass of seed weighed in water (g), ρw = Density of water (1.0g/cm3 )

Porosity (P): The Porosity of the bulk seed was computed from the values of the true density and bulk density of the seeds by using the relationship adopted by [3].

P=\frac{\left ( 1-p_{b} \right )}{p_{s}}

Where P = Porosity, ρb = Bulk density, ρs = Solid density.

Angle of Repose: The filling and emptying angles of repose were determined according to the method described by [12].

(i) Filling angle of repose (?f)

The beans were allowed to fall onto a circular plate of 200mm diameter mounted on a laboratory stand from a height of 150mm to form a natural heap. The height of the heap (h) was measured and the angle of repose (?f ) was calculated as:

\theta _{f}=tan^{-1}\frac{h}{100}

Where h = height of the heap (cm)

(ii) Emptying angle of repose (?e)

This was obtained using a plywood box of dimensions 200mm x 200mm x 200mm which had a front sliding panel. The box was filled with the seeds and the front sliding panel was quickly slid upward allowing the bean seeds to flow out and form a natural heap. The angle of repose was determined from measured height of beans at two points (h1 and h2 ) in the sloping bean heap and the horizontal distance between the two points (x1 and x2 ) using the relation:

Where h1 and h2 are the least and highest heights (mm) of the heap respectively chosen, and x1 and x2 are the respective horizontal distance (mm) between the two points.

Static coefficient of friction (µ): The method of [11] was adopted. The Static coefficient of friction of the seeds was determined with respect to each of the following six structural materials namely plywood, glass, aluminium, wood, stainless steel and formica. A four-sided plywood container with dimensions of 150mm x 100mm x 40mm open at both the top and bottom was filled with the seeds after placing on an adjustable tilting surface. The structural surface with the box on its top was gradually raised until the box just started to slide down. The angle of inclination was read from a graduated scale and the coefficient of friction was taken as the tangent of this angle. This procedure was repeated using the other structural materials.

\theta _{e}=tan^{-1}\left [ \frac{h_{2}-h_{1}}{x_{2}-x_{1}} \right ]

Where µ = Static coefficient of friction for the structural material, β = Angle of inclination

NOTE: β = tan-1 Vertical height of inclined plane

Base length of the platform

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The results of the engineering properties of white-coated seed variety of the African yam bean and the brown-coated variety are shown in Tables 1 and 2 respectively. The numeric values of the properties and their implications are jointly presented as follows:

Table 1: Engineering properties of white-coated African yam bean seeds..

Properties

N

Mean

S.D

Min

Max. value

Value

Length (mm)

20

6.524

±0.05421

5.4

7.5

Width (mm)

20

4.843

±0.05241

3.7

5.94

Thickness (mm)

20

4.881

±0.05195

3.8

5.7

A.M.D, Da (mm)

20

5.416

±0.5125

4.3

6.23

G.M.D, Dg (mm)

20

5.3536

±0.98129

4.174

6.07

Sphericity,?

20

0.8206

±0.0954

0.6944

0.823

Surface area (mm2)

3

90.053

±31.0764

54.7408

115.7667

M1, 000 (g)

3

267.167

±7.6291

261.8

275.9

Bulk density, ρb (g/cm3)

3

0.8055

±0.0081

0.7974

0.8136

Solid density, ρs (g/cm3)

3

1.3679

±0.0035

1.364

1.3707

Porosity, P (%)

 

41.11

     

Volume, V (mm3)

 

13.238

     

Specific surface

 

218.1584

     

Area (mm2/cm3)

         
   

Angle of repose (?)

     

Filling method, θf (?)

3

5.597

±0.2601 5

5.3132

5.824

Emptying method, θe (?)

3

22.132

±4.5565

18.835

25.277

   

Coefficient of static friction (µ) on various surfaces

     

Plywood

3

0.2918

±0.000999

0.2907

0.2924

Glass

3

0.35

±0.007216

0.3426

0.3564

Stainless steel

3

0.25

±0.003797

0.2469

0.2531

Aluminum

3

0.298

±0.00644

0.2903

0.3021

Wood

3

0.2476

±0.001145

0.2362

0.2591

Formica

3

0.37

±0.00663

0.364

0.376

   

Moisture content (%)

     

Wet basis

 

4.056

     

Dry basis

 

4.23

     

Keys: A.M.D = Arithmetic mean diameter    G.M.D = Geometric mean diameter; M1,000  =  One thousand seed mass     N = Number of replications; S.D   = Standard deviation

 

 

Table 2: Engineering properties of brown speckled African Yam bean seeds.

Properties

N

Mean

S.D

Min

Max. value

Value

Length (mm)

11

7.4018

±0.0491

6.22

7.9

Width (mm)

11

5.344

±0.0487

4.2

6.2

Thickness (mm)

11

5.4

±0.0252

4.9

5.8

A.M.D, Da (mm)

11

6.0486

±0.53595

5.1827

6.1831

G.M.D, Dg (mm)

11

5.8718

±0.01661

0.7835

0.7986

Sphericity,?

3

0.7933

±0.01661

0.7835

0.7986

Surface area (mm2)

3

108.328

±18.9151

84.3953

120.1209

M1, 000 (g)

3

334.267

±10.289

322.7

342.4

Bulk density, ρb (g/cm3)

3

0.8008

±0.00193

0.7987

0.8025

Solid density, ρs (g/cm3)

3

1.2216

±0.00238

1.2189

1.2232

Porosity, P (%)

 

65.55

     

Volume, V (mm3)

 

16.3406

     

Specific surface

 

211.583

     

Area (mm2/cm3)

         
   

Angle of repose (θ)

     

Filling method, θf (?)

3

5.73

±0.0866

5.6539

5.824

Emptying method, θe (?)

3

22.073

±5.3912

18.1595

25.781

   

Coefficient of static friction (µ) on various surfaces

     

Plywood

3

0.258

±0.00406

0.256

0.263

Glass

3

0.297

±0.00265

0.2941

0.2993

Stainless steel

3

0.225

±0.00

0.225

0.225

Aluminum

3

0.2668

±0.01465

0.2522

0.2815

Wood

3

0.2451

±0.00975

0.2343

0.2533

Formica

3

0.334

±0.00589

0.328

0.34

   

Moisture content (%)

     

Wet basis

 

2.82

     

Dry basis

 

2.904

     

Keys: A.M.D = Arithmetic mean diameter; G.M.D = Geometric mean diameter; M1,000 = One thousand seed mass

N = Number of replications; S.D= Standard deviation

Moisture content

The value of moisture content (on wet weight basis) was 2.820% for the brown variety and 4.056% for the white variety. The value obtained for the brown variety was close to the range (2.840% - 3.130%) stated by [3]. It can be seen that the browncoated AYB seed is of lower moisture content than the white variety. In addition, the value of moisture content on dry weight basis was 2.904% for the brown variety and 4.230% for the white variety. Nonetheless, the seeds can be said to be of generally low moisture content.

Size and shape of seeds

The length of the white-coated AYB seed cultivar ranged from 5.40mm to 7.50mm, with a mean value of 6.52mm, while the value of the width was between 3.70mm and 5.90mm with a mean value of 4.84mm. The thickness was spread between 3.80mm and 5.70mm with an average value of 4.88mm. The arithmetic mean diameter ranged from 4.30mm to 6.23mm with a mean value of 5.42mm, while the geometric mean diameter was in the range of 4.17mm to 6.07mm with an average of 5.35mm.

In contrast, the brown-coated variety had a length of 6.22- 7.90mm (mean, 7.402mm), width, 4.2-6.2mm (mean, 5.344mm) and thickness of 4.9-5.8mm (average, 5.4mm). The arithmetic mean diameter of the brown variety was in the range of 5.37mm to 6.37mm (average, 6.0409mm) and the geometric mean diameter values ranged from 5.183mm to 6.183mm (mean, 5.872mm). These values indicated that the brown-coated variety was larger than the white variety, probably as a function of species diversity, and this size disparity could be utilized in the design of aperture sizes of size-sorting equipment [10] in cases where mixed seed sizes occur.

The shape of the seeds, on the basis of sphericity ?, implied that the white variety is closer to a sphere (mean value, 0.821) than the brown-coated variety (average, 0.793). This property is relevant in the conceptualization of hoppers where decision is premised/based on rolling or sliding characteristics of agricultural produce and handling machineries [13]. This suggested that, seed for seed, the white variety of AYB seed would have an increased tendency to roll on a surface than the brown variety, as a lower sphericity is an indication that the seed cannot roll on its side, but slide when suitably inclined. This has been stated by [6] in their work on the measurement of some engineering properties of sandbox seeds.

Surface area and specific surface area

The value of surface area of the seeds ranged from 54.741mm2 to 115.767mm2 (mean, 90.053mm2 ) for the white variety, and 84.395mm2 to 120.121mm2 (Average, 108.328mm2 ) for the brown-coated specie. The surface area of food materials is important in handling and processing operations, especially in calculating the terminal velocity of the material which is utilized in aero- and hydrodynamic activities such as in pneumatic conveying and separation processes where the material is lifted only when the air velocity is greater than its terminal velocity [14], thus affecting the air stream that can be used in order to separate the seed from unwanted materials as in pneumatic separators, or to move the seed as in pneumatic conveyors.

The specific surface area values for the seeds (218.158mm2 / cm3 for the white cultivar and 211.583mm2 /cm3 for the browncoated specie) are quite high. This indicated that the browncoated AYB seeds would exhibit less mass or energy transfer rate through its surface than the white variety, as explained by [3] in their work on the determination of some physical properties of African yam beans.

Seed volume and thousand-seed mass

The values for the volume of the seeds were 13.238mm3 and 16.341mm3 for the white and brown-coated cultivars respectively. This suggested that the brown variety would occupy more space than the white variety, albeit with fewer number of seeds i.e the bulk of the seeds of the white variety would be contained by the same vessel that would enclose (being filled with) a lower quantity of brown seeds.

The thousand seed mass of the white variety ranged from 261.80g to 275.90g with a mean value of 267.167g compared to the brown variety which had a range of 322.70g to 342.40g with a mean value of 334.267g. This wide disparity was expected, as the variations in surface area, bulk density and volume imply the possibility of the brown AYB seed containing more matter within it than the white variety. Also, mathematically, the mean unit mass of the seeds would be 0.267g and 0.334g for the white and brown-coloured varieties respectively which was within the range of values (0.129g to 0.384g) obtained by [3] for African yam bean seeds.

Bulk density, solid density and porosity

The tapped bulk density of the white variety had a mean value of 0.805g/cm3 (min. 0.797g/cm3 , max. 0.814g/cm3 ) while the brown variety had an average value of 0.801g/cm3 (min. 0.799g/cm3 , max, 0.802g/cm3 ). The smaller sizes, as well as the variation in shape of the white-coated cultivar, may have accounted for the higher bulk density values [12] as they would be more aggregated than the brown varieties in the same volume. Nonetheless, it must be well understood that bulk density is not an intrinsic property of a material, as it can change depending on how the material is handled, the interaction between the surfaces of the materials in contact and the degree of intensity of the compaction process [15].

The solid density values were in the range of 1.364g/cm3 – 1.371g/cm3 (mean, 1.368g/cm3 ) for the white AYB seeds and 1.219g/cm3 – 1.223g/cm3 (average, 1.222g/cm3 ) for the brown type. It indicated that the seeds would sink in water, being denser than water (ρ = 1.0g/cm3 ), as was evident during the analytical process. This property could be optimized when separating the African yam bean seeds from less dense contaminants (e.g husks, chaff, spoilt seeds, etc) during wet cleaning operations, especially via soaking.

The porosity values of the seeds were 41.11% for the whitecoated variety and 65.55% for the brown variety, and it was indicative of the volume fraction of void space or air inside a material, which accounts for the interaction of components and formation/collapse of air or void phase during processing [16]. The porous properties of food materials determine key macroscopic parameters such as water-holding capacity and texture [17]. Diffusion coefficient is enhanced by increases in porosity which, in turn, is affected by the water content of foods. An increase in the moisture content of foods leads to a swelling of the components and a subsequent decrease in porosity of the material [18]. This implied that while the seeds do not hydrate easily, the brown seeds would hydrate more readily than the white variety when the threshold was attained.

Angles of repose

The mean filling angle of repose (?f ) of the white AYB seeds (5.597°) is less than that of the brown seeds (5.730°). This contradicts the true assertion of [12] that smaller sizes can interlock more to cause a higher heap formation than relatively bigger sizes. Still, the angular variation may not be critical enough to result in any wide disparity, and may be a function of the shape/size of the seed and surface conditions of the seeds which influences their cohesion/adhesion characteristics [5].

The mean emptying angle of repose (?e ) obtained for the white and brown seed varieties were very close at 22.132o and 22.073° respectively. It must be stated that the mean emptying angle of repose (?e ) obtained for sandbox seeds was in the range (19.2 – 26.2°) [6] while 23.78° was obtained by [3] for African yam bean. This implied that the brown varieties seemed to have a somewhat slightly smoother surface than the white variety. Though, both would readily flow out of self-emptying bins or hoppers during raw material reception or processing when the vessel bearing them was tipped at an angle.

Coefficient of static friction (µ) on various surfaces

For the white variety, the mean values of the coefficient of static friction were found to increase progressively from planed wood surface (0.248) to stainless steel (0.250), plywood (0.292), aluminium (0.298), and glass (0.350) and to formica (0.370). These values differed from the mean values obtained for the brown-coated AYB seed cultivar, with the structural surfaces progressively exhibiting the following values: Stainless steel (0.225), planed wood surface (0.245), plywood (0.258), aluminium (0.267), glass (0.297) and Formica (0.334).

Generally, aluminium, glass and Formica were surprisingly observed to offer some resistance to sliding to the box of seeds in either variety of African yam beans. Though the size and weight of seeds, as well as the packing differences of seeds in the box, and surface characteristics of each of the structural surfaces used (even at the microscopic level) may have resulted in the degrees of disparities observed in the values of the coefficient of static friction. This observation may make a case for using less expensive, natural sources of contact surfaces when selecting and determining the slopes of the feed hopper of AYB seed processing equipment, or in the design of seed hopper in mechanized planters.

CONCLUSION

This work has successfully investigated the engineering properties of two varieties of African yam bean seeds, the white-coated and browncoated varieties.

The mean values for length, width and thickness (all in mm) were generally lower for the white variety than for the brown variety. The average arithmetic and geometric mean diameter values further confirmed this, as was evident from the bigger sizes of the brown seeds compared to the white species.

The mean sphericity values for both seeds implied that both seeds were closer to a sphere in shape, though the white seed type had a higher tendency to roll when placed at a particular orientation to improve emptying (as in hopper or conveyor belt/inclined plane platforms).

The specific surface and mean surface areas suggested that both seed varieties would fall through a stream of air at the right velocity while lighter/irregularly-shaped chaff/extraneous matter are blown away during pneumatic separation (such as aspiration/winnowing processes) or remain on the belt during pneumatic conveyance.

The mean values for volume, bulk density solid density, 1,000-seed mass, unit mass and porosity values indicated that the seeds will not float in water and these values would help to separate unwanted particles from the seeds during wet cleaning on the basis of buoyancy differences. Though, more seeds of the white variety would occupy the same space than the seeds with brown seed coat.

The values of angle of repose suggested that they would readily form heaps during collection/packaging and flow out readily during emptying of the holding vessel.

The coefficient of static friction on various surfaces was indicative of the trend of increased resistance to sliding of the bulk seeds when placed on the respective surfaces. This would be useful in the design of conveying devices like raw materials’ reception plane, processing machine hoppers or agricultural machine (planter) hoppers.

REFERENCES

1. Klu G Y, Bansa D, Kumaga F K, Aboagye L M, Benett-Lartey S O, Gamedoagbao D K. The African Yam bean (Sphenostylis stenocarpa): A neglected crop in Ghana. West Afr J Applied Ecology. 2000; 1: 53-60.

2. Ameh GI. Proximate and mineral composition of seed and tuber of African yam bean, Sphenostylis stenocarpa (Hoechst Ex. A Rich) Harms. 2007; 6: 1-10.

3. Asoiro FU, Ani AO. Determination of some physical properties of African Yam beans. Pacific J Sci Tech. 2011; 12 1: 374-380.

4. Ikhajiagbe B, Mensah JK. Genetic assessment of three colour variants of African yam bean (Sphenostylis stenocarpa) commonly grown in the Mid-Western region of Nigeria. Int J Modern Botany. 2012; 2:13- 18.

5. Helmy M, Derbala A, Badr S, Shohyieb S. Effect of physical and engineering properties of some corn seed varieties on pneumatic machine performance. Misr J Ag Eng. 2009; 26: 1397-1411.

6. Idowu DO, Abegunrin TP, Ola FA, Adediran AA, Olaniran JA. Measurement of some engineering properties of sandbox seeds (Hura crepitans). Agri Bio J North Am. 2012; 3: 318-325.

7. Ardebili MS, Najafi G, Ghobadian B, Hashjin TT. Determination ofsome mechanical properties of castor seed (Ricinus communis L) to design and fabricate an oil extraction machine. J Agr Sci Tech. 2012; 14: 1219- 1227.

8. Ojukwu M, Olawuni IA, Ibeabuchi C, Amandikwa C. Physical, proximate and functional properties of “Nsama”, a local variety of African yam bean (Sphenostylis stenocarpa) grown in Southern States in Nigeria. Afri J Food Sci Tech. 2012; 3: 260-267.

9. Ahmadi H, Mollazade K, Khorshidi J, Mohtasebi SS, Rajabipour A. Some physical and mechanical properties of fennel seed (Foeniculum vulgare). J Agr Sci. 2009; 1: 66-75.

10. Adebowale AA, Fetuga GO, Apata CB, Sanni LO. Effect of variety and initial moisture content on physical properties of improved millet grains. Nigerian Food J. 2012; 30: 5-10.

11. Adejumo BA, Abayomi DA. Effect of moisture content on some physical properties of Moringa oleifera seed. IOSR J Agri Vet Sci. 2012; 1: 12-21.

12. Bart-plange A, Dzisi AK, Addo A, Teye E, Kumi F. A Comparative study of some physical properties of large and medium size cocoa bean from Ghana. ARPN J Sci Tech. 2012; 2: 135-141.

13. Olalusi AP, Bolaji OT. Some engineering properties of indigenous grown jatropha seeds (“Lapalapa”). Electronic J Env Agr Food Chem. 2010; 9: 1760-1771.

14. Chaudhary DA. Engineering properties of Biological materials. A technical paper presentation. 2015.

15. Wikipedia (2015). Bulk Density. Retrieved on 10/09/2015 from https://www.en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bulk_density.

16. Barbosa-Canovas GV, Juliano P, Peleg M. Engineering properties of Foods: In Food Engineering (ed. Gustavo V. Barbosa-Canovas). Oxford. EOLSS Publishers. 2004.

17. Haiduc A M, Van Duynhoven J. Correlation of porous and functional properties of food materials by NMR relaxometry and multivariate analysis. Magn Reson Imaging. 2005; 23: 343-345.

18. Roca E, Guillard V, Guilbert S, Gontard N. Moisture migration in a cereal-composite food at high water activity: Effects of initial porosity and fat content. J Cereal Sci. 2006; 43: 144-151.

Ohaegbulam PO, Okorie SU, Ojinnaka MC (2017) Evaluation of the Engineering Properties of Two Varieties of African Yam Bean (Sphenostylis stenocarpa) Seeds. J Hum Nutr Food Sci 6(1): 11158.

Received : 29 Jan 2018
Accepted : 13 Feb 2018
Published : 15 Feb 2018
Journals
Annals of Otolaryngology and Rhinology
ISSN : 2379-948X
Launched : 2014
JSM Schizophrenia
Launched : 2016
Journal of Nausea
Launched : 2020
JSM Internal Medicine
Launched : 2016
JSM Hepatitis
Launched : 2016
JSM Oro Facial Surgeries
ISSN : 2578-3211
Launched : 2016
JSM Regenerative Medicine and Bioengineering
ISSN : 2379-0490
Launched : 2013
JSM Spine
ISSN : 2578-3181
Launched : 2016
Archives of Palliative Care
ISSN : 2573-1165
Launched : 2016
JSM Nutritional Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3203
Launched : 2017
Annals of Neurodegenerative Disorders
ISSN : 2476-2032
Launched : 2016
Journal of Fever
ISSN : 2641-7782
Launched : 2017
JSM Bone Marrow Research
ISSN : 2578-3351
Launched : 2016
JSM Mathematics and Statistics
ISSN : 2578-3173
Launched : 2014
Journal of Autoimmunity and Research
ISSN : 2573-1173
Launched : 2014
JSM Arthritis
ISSN : 2475-9155
Launched : 2016
JSM Head and Neck Cancer-Cases and Reviews
ISSN : 2573-1610
Launched : 2016
JSM General Surgery Cases and Images
ISSN : 2573-1564
Launched : 2016
JSM Anatomy and Physiology
ISSN : 2573-1262
Launched : 2016
JSM Dental Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1548
Launched : 2016
Annals of Emergency Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1017
Launched : 2016
Annals of Mens Health and Wellness
ISSN : 2641-7707
Launched : 2017
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Health Care
ISSN : 2576-0084
Launched : 2018
Journal of Chronic Diseases and Management
ISSN : 2573-1300
Launched : 2016
Annals of Vaccines and Immunization
ISSN : 2378-9379
Launched : 2014
JSM Heart Surgery Cases and Images
ISSN : 2578-3157
Launched : 2016
Annals of Reproductive Medicine and Treatment
ISSN : 2573-1092
Launched : 2016
JSM Brain Science
ISSN : 2573-1289
Launched : 2016
JSM Biomarkers
ISSN : 2578-3815
Launched : 2014
JSM Biology
ISSN : 2475-9392
Launched : 2016
Archives of Stem Cell and Research
ISSN : 2578-3580
Launched : 2014
Annals of Clinical and Medical Microbiology
ISSN : 2578-3629
Launched : 2014
JSM Pediatric Surgery
ISSN : 2578-3149
Launched : 2017
Journal of Memory Disorder and Rehabilitation
ISSN : 2578-319X
Launched : 2016
JSM Tropical Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2578-3165
Launched : 2016
JSM Head and Face Medicine
ISSN : 2578-3793
Launched : 2016
JSM Cardiothoracic Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1297
Launched : 2016
JSM Bone and Joint Diseases
ISSN : 2578-3351
Launched : 2017
JSM Bioavailability and Bioequivalence
ISSN : 2641-7812
Launched : 2017
JSM Atherosclerosis
ISSN : 2573-1270
Launched : 2016
Journal of Genitourinary Disorders
ISSN : 2641-7790
Launched : 2017
Journal of Fractures and Sprains
ISSN : 2578-3831
Launched : 2016
Journal of Autism and Epilepsy
ISSN : 2641-7774
Launched : 2016
Annals of Marine Biology and Research
ISSN : 2573-105X
Launched : 2014
JSM Health Education & Primary Health Care
ISSN : 2578-3777
Launched : 2016
JSM Communication Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3807
Launched : 2016
Annals of Musculoskeletal Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3599
Launched : 2016
Annals of Virology and Research
ISSN : 2573-1122
Launched : 2014
JSM Renal Medicine
ISSN : 2573-1637
Launched : 2016
Journal of Muscle Health
ISSN : 2578-3823
Launched : 2016
JSM Genetics and Genomics
ISSN : 2334-1823
Launched : 2013
JSM Anxiety and Depression
ISSN : 2475-9139
Launched : 2016
Clinical Journal of Heart Diseases
ISSN : 2641-7766
Launched : 2016
Annals of Medicinal Chemistry and Research
ISSN : 2378-9336
Launched : 2014
JSM Pain and Management
ISSN : 2578-3378
Launched : 2016
JSM Women's Health
ISSN : 2578-3696
Launched : 2016
Clinical Research in HIV or AIDS
ISSN : 2374-0094
Launched : 2013
Journal of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Obesity
ISSN : 2333-6692
Launched : 2013
Journal of Substance Abuse and Alcoholism
ISSN : 2373-9363
Launched : 2013
JSM Neurosurgery and Spine
ISSN : 2373-9479
Launched : 2013
Journal of Liver and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2379-0830
Launched : 2014
Journal of Drug Design and Research
ISSN : 2379-089X
Launched : 2014
JSM Clinical Oncology and Research
ISSN : 2373-938X
Launched : 2013
JSM Bioinformatics, Genomics and Proteomics
ISSN : 2576-1102
Launched : 2014
JSM Chemistry
ISSN : 2334-1831
Launched : 2013
Journal of Trauma and Care
ISSN : 2573-1246
Launched : 2014
JSM Surgical Oncology and Research
ISSN : 2578-3688
Launched : 2016
Annals of Food Processing and Preservation
ISSN : 2573-1033
Launched : 2016
Journal of Radiology and Radiation Therapy
ISSN : 2333-7095
Launched : 2013
JSM Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
ISSN : 2578-3572
Launched : 2016
Annals of Clinical Pathology
ISSN : 2373-9282
Launched : 2013
Annals of Cardiovascular Diseases
ISSN : 2641-7731
Launched : 2016
Journal of Behavior
ISSN : 2576-0076
Launched : 2016
Annals of Clinical and Experimental Metabolism
ISSN : 2572-2492
Launched : 2016
Clinical Research in Infectious Diseases
ISSN : 2379-0636
Launched : 2013
JSM Microbiology
ISSN : 2333-6455
Launched : 2013
Journal of Urology and Research
ISSN : 2379-951X
Launched : 2014
Journal of Family Medicine and Community Health
ISSN : 2379-0547
Launched : 2013
Annals of Pregnancy and Care
ISSN : 2578-336X
Launched : 2017
JSM Cell and Developmental Biology
ISSN : 2379-061X
Launched : 2013
Annals of Aquaculture and Research
ISSN : 2379-0881
Launched : 2014
Clinical Research in Pulmonology
ISSN : 2333-6625
Launched : 2013
Journal of Immunology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2333-6714
Launched : 2013
Annals of Forensic Research and Analysis
ISSN : 2378-9476
Launched : 2014
JSM Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
ISSN : 2333-7109
Launched : 2013
Annals of Breast Cancer Research
ISSN : 2641-7685
Launched : 2016
Annals of Gerontology and Geriatric Research
ISSN : 2378-9409
Launched : 2014
Journal of Sleep Medicine and Disorders
ISSN : 2379-0822
Launched : 2014
JSM Burns and Trauma
ISSN : 2475-9406
Launched : 2016
Chemical Engineering and Process Techniques
ISSN : 2333-6633
Launched : 2013
Annals of Clinical Cytology and Pathology
ISSN : 2475-9430
Launched : 2014
JSM Allergy and Asthma
ISSN : 2573-1254
Launched : 2016
Journal of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
ISSN : 2334-2307
Launched : 2013
Annals of Sports Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2379-0571
Launched : 2014
JSM Sexual Medicine
ISSN : 2578-3718
Launched : 2016
Annals of Vascular Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2378-9344
Launched : 2014
JSM Biotechnology and Biomedical Engineering
ISSN : 2333-7117
Launched : 2013
Journal of Hematology and Transfusion
ISSN : 2333-6684
Launched : 2013
JSM Environmental Science and Ecology
ISSN : 2333-7141
Launched : 2013
Journal of Cardiology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2333-6676
Launched : 2013
JSM Nanotechnology and Nanomedicine
ISSN : 2334-1815
Launched : 2013
Journal of Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders
ISSN : 2475-9473
Launched : 2016
JSM Ophthalmology
ISSN : 2333-6447
Launched : 2013
Journal of Pharmacology and Clinical Toxicology
ISSN : 2333-7079
Launched : 2013
Annals of Psychiatry and Mental Health
ISSN : 2374-0124
Launched : 2013
Medical Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
ISSN : 2333-6439
Launched : 2013
Annals of Pediatrics and Child Health
ISSN : 2373-9312
Launched : 2013
JSM Clinical Pharmaceutics
ISSN : 2379-9498
Launched : 2014
JSM Foot and Ankle
ISSN : 2475-9112
Launched : 2016
JSM Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementia
ISSN : 2378-9565
Launched : 2014
Journal of Addiction Medicine and Therapy
ISSN : 2333-665X
Launched : 2013
Journal of Veterinary Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2378-931X
Launched : 2013
Annals of Public Health and Research
ISSN : 2378-9328
Launched : 2014
Annals of Orthopedics and Rheumatology
ISSN : 2373-9290
Launched : 2013
Journal of Clinical Nephrology and Research
ISSN : 2379-0652
Launched : 2014
Annals of Community Medicine and Practice
ISSN : 2475-9465
Launched : 2014
Annals of Biometrics and Biostatistics
ISSN : 2374-0116
Launched : 2013
JSM Clinical Case Reports
ISSN : 2373-9819
Launched : 2013
Journal of Cancer Biology and Research
ISSN : 2373-9436
Launched : 2013
Journal of Surgery and Transplantation Science
ISSN : 2379-0911
Launched : 2013
Journal of Dermatology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2373-9371
Launched : 2013
JSM Gastroenterology and Hepatology
ISSN : 2373-9487
Launched : 2013
Annals of Nursing and Practice
ISSN : 2379-9501
Launched : 2014
JSM Dentistry
ISSN : 2333-7133
Launched : 2013
Author Information X