Journal of Human Nutrition and Food Science

Healthy Eating Index and Semen Parameters in Iranian Infertile Men

Research Article | Open Access | Volume 11 | Issue 2

  • 1. Department of Community Nutrition, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Iran
  • 2. Department of Nutrition, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Iran
  • 3. Department of Nutrition, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Iran
  • 4. Department of Nutrition, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Iran
  • 5. Food security research center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Iran
+ Show More - Show Less
Corresponding Authors
Reza Ghiasvand, Food security research center Isfahan, University of Medical Sciences Isfaha, PO Box, 81745, Iran


Infertility had an increasing trend between couples in Iran. Some epidemiological studies have reported a relationship between infertility and lifestyle patterns including dietary habits. Our objective was to identify the relation between Healthy eating index and sperm parameters in Iranian infertile men.


This cross-sectional was performed on 400 newly diagnosed infertile men in Yazd Reproductive Sciences Institute from July to December 2019. Men were recruited when their infertility was confirmed by the expert andrologist based on WHO criteria. They delivered a semen sample and answered a 168 items semi quantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). All data were analyzed using SPSS V. 22 software. P-value less than 0.5 considered as significant.


There was significant association between sperm density and HEI score tertile in crude model but after adjustment for potential confounders there was not any association. Participants in highest tertile had a higher risk of density and lower risk of motility in crude model (OR =1.69; 95% CI: 1.00, 2.88; P=0.05 and OR=1.31; 95% CI: 0.78, 2.21; P=0.29) and risk of density (OR=1.15; 95% CI: 0.65, 2.03; P=0.63 and OR=1.31; 95% CI: 0.71, 2.40; P=0.38) and motility decrease in adjusted models (OR=0.86; 95% CI: 0.49, 1.52; P=0.59 and OR=0.92; 95% CI: 0.50, 1.67; P=0.74).


We concluded that adherence to HEI principles can have a positive effect on men’s fertility. However, more research is needed to confirm these relations and provide the evidence needed to exert these findings into clinical practice.


Healthy eating index, Male infertility, Sperm parameters


Haeri F, Sadrmanesh O, Leilami K, Nouri M, Ghiasvand R (2023) Healthy Eating Index and Semen Parameters in Iranian Infertile Men. J Hum Nutr Food Sci 11(2): 1164.


Over the last years, there has been an increasing concern about a global decline in men’s fertility [1]. Male fertility is a key aspect of reproductive health and infertility is identified as a global public health issue by the World Health Organization (WHO). Infertility is defined by the WHO and International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) as the ‘failure to achieve a pregnancy after 12 months or more of constantly unprotected sexual intercourse. The prevalence of infertility among couples according to various sources, is from 8% to 25% [2-4]. Specifically, some evidence indicates that sperm quality has decreased over the last years [1]. several reasons have been recommended for semen quality declination [5-7]. Recent studies have identified a link between lifestyle patterns and infertility [8,9]. Rapid changes in nutritional behavior, such as the increased prevalence of unhealthy dietary patterns, characterized by higher intake of trans fatty acids, saturated fat, and sodium and lower consumption of antioxidant-rich foods, such as fruits and vegetables have impacted reproductive health. A compound of food fundamental consolidated into the appropriate dietary pattern may have more favoring effects in prevention or control of the disease. Several approaches have been suggested for evaluating the dietary patterns such as healthy eating index (HEI). This index was designed to evaluate diet quality in different societies with different dietary patterns. The results of previous studies on the relationship between dietary patterns with male infertility are limited. Also, there is no information about the association of HEI-2010 score and infertility among Iranian male.

The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between HEI-2010 score and semen quality and quantity among Iranian infertile men.


Study population 

This cross-sectiona study was conducted on 400 infertile men that referred to Yazd Reproduction Research Institutefrom July to December 2019. Inclusion criteria include age between 20 to 55 years, progressive motility < 32%, normal morphology <4%, semen volume < 1.5 ml and sperm count < 15 million per milliliter [10]. Also, exclusion criteria containing history of testicular atrophy, urinary infection, hypospadias, genital diseases, androgens, anticoagulants, cytotoxic drugs or immunosuppressant, metabolic diseases such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes, cancer, osteoporosis or renal disease, ejaculatory disorder, stenosis, varicocele, use of supplements, adherence to specific diets, no-response to more than 35 items of food frequency questionnaire and underreporting and over-reporting of energy intake (more than 4,200 and less than 800) [11,12] Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study and dietary information was collected by trained interviewer

Physical examination and lifestyle variable

Data regarding physical activity level were assessed using a validated and reliable questionnaire (International Physical Activity Questionnaire) [13]. This questionnaire provides data about levels of strenuous activity, moderate activity, walking and inactivity. For all that, we identified the data regarding duration (minutes per day) and frequency (days per week) for all type of activities. Socioeconomic status (SES) of the subjects was concluded based on variables, such as education (number of years of study), home situation (landlord-tenant), has car (yesno), number of overseas trips, washing machine and dishwasher (yes-no), individual occupation..

Anthropometric data

Anthropometric information include Waist to hip ratio (WHR) and Body mass index (BMI), determined based on standard protocol of World Health Organization (WHO) [14], under special condition, without shoes and wearing minimal, to the nearest 0.1kg, by using Falcon scales (Seca, Hamburg, Germany). Also, all measurements were archived with an accuracy of 0.1 cm. Waist circumference (WC) was measured midpoint between the last rib and the iliac crest (umbilical level) and hip circumference (HC) was measured since the widest part of buttocks. BMI and WHR were calculated according to this formula: BMI: weight (kg)/ height (m2) and WC: (cm)/HC (cm), respectively [14].

Dietary assessment

Usual dietary intake was identified by using a 168 items semi quantitative Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ). The validity of FFQ is confirmed in Iran [15]. This form was designed according to frequency of consumption of the common foods of one’s country during the past 12 months (number of times consumed daily, weekly, monthly, and annually). FFQ was filled out by a trained nutritionist, by interviewing. The dietary fatty acids and minerals intake were determined by computer program from the food- frequency data, using standard portion sizes and the mineral contents given in the food composition tables.

Semen analysis

Semen samples were taken from participants following 3days of abstinence. After providing sample, the container kept in Incubator for 30 min to liquefied. samples were kept in sterile containers at 37 ° C for 30 minutes, and were then assessed and analyzed according to the WHO Fifth Edition Laboratory Guidelines [16]. Four parameters of semen and sperm including semen volume, sperm concentration, normal sperm morphology and sperm motility were measured.

Statistical methods

In this study, participants were categorized based on tertiles of Healthy Eating Index (HEI). To access the normality of the data, Kolmogorove-Smirnov test was used. To compare continuous and categorical variables across tertiles of HEI, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and chi-squared test was used. To assess the relation between HEI and odds of sperm parameters, two different multivariable logistic regressions was used (crude and adjusted model). Age and energy intake controlled in the first adjusted model, and BMI, marriage time, educational status, physical activity, alcohol and smoking history were added in the second adjusted model.

The latest version of HEI index designed in 2015 according to 2015–2020 dietary guidelines for Americans [17]. HEI-2015 scores calculated with 13 components. The maximum point for each component was 5 or 10. The highest consumption of total fruits, whole fruits, total vegetables, greens and beans, total protein foods, seafood and plant proteins scored 5 and for whole grains, dairy and fatty acids ((Polyunsaturated fatty acid + Monounsaturated fatty acids)/Saturated fatty acid) scored 10. For example, the lowest consumption of these 9 items scored 0, whereas the highest consumption scored 5 or 10. The other 4 components (including refined grains, sodium, added sugars and saturated fats) were scored in reverse, which means that, the lowest consumption of these items was scored as 10 and the highest was scored as 0. By summing the scores of all 13 components, total HEI score was calculated and the participants were categorized into tertile based on their scores.

Statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS for Windows software (version 20.0), SPSS Inc, and Chicago IL. P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


Table 1. Basic characteristics of participants across the tertiles of HEI scores.

Variable HEI
T1 (N=136) T2 (N=131) T3 (N=130) P-value
Age (year) 33.67±7.07 33.59±6.54 33.71±5.58 0.98
Weight (kg) 76.66±14.94 80.89±20.17 81.11±19.60 0.08
Height (cm) 175.43±8.48 27.33±5.36 26.17±5.51 <0.001
Body mass index (kg/m2 ) 25.02±4.88 27.33±5.36 26.17±5.51 0.002
Waist circumference (cm) 89.09±17.58 95.28±18.82 97.13±22.76 0.003
Hip circumference (cm) 96.84±17.87 102.09±21.84 92.13±24.11 0.001
WHR 0.92±0.08 0.94±0.09 1.06±0.11 <0.001
Education (year) 10.32±3.47 10.22±4.44 10.97±4.46 0.28
Physical activity level (n (%))       <0.001
Inactive 27 (19.85) 43 (32.82) 66 (50.77)
Minimal activity 57 (41.91) 49 (37.40) 48 (36.92)
High activity 52 (38.24) 39 (29.78) 16 (12.31)
Smoking history (n (%))       0.71
Yes 55 (40.44) 57 (43.51) 59 (45.39)
No 81 (59.56) 74 (56.49) 71 (54.61)
Near living areas to fields (n (%))       <0.001
Yes 74 (54.41) 52 (39.69) 23 (17.69)
No 62 (45.59) 79 (60.31) 107 (82.31)

HEI, healthy eating index; WHR, waist to hip ratio. Values are mean (SD) for continuous and percentage for categorical variables. Using one-way ANOVA for continuous and Chi-square test for categorical variables.

Table 1 illustrates the baseline characteristics of participants through tertiles of HEI. The mean age, body mass index and waist circumference of infertile men were 33.65 years, 26.16 kg/m2 , 93.76 cm, respectively. There was a significant change between tertiles of HEI with BMI, waist and hip circumferences. Waist circumference was higher in last tertile of HEI score and hip circumference was higher in the first tertile therefore, WHR (waist to hip ratio) was higher in the last tertile. There was a significant relationship between physical activity level and near living areas to fields with HEI.

Table 2. Dietary intakes of participants across the tertiles of HEI scores

Variable HEI
T1 (N=136) T2 (N=131) T3 (N=130) P-value
Nutrient items        
Energy (kcal/d) 2724.33±677.99 3095.62±601.07 3165.05±582.60 <0.001
Carbohydrate (g/d) 596.58±244.35 726.52±372.39 540.90±261.26 <0.001
Protein (g/d 149.67±60.81 176.78±71.95 132.08±61.07 <0.001
Fat (g/d) 152.22±60.81 193.13±96.65 118.25±53.68 <0.001
SFA (g/d) 49.40±23.79 58.56±32.44 32.42±16.39 <0.001
MUFA (g/d) 48.93±19.57 62.53±31.49 40.34±15.67 <0.001
PUFA (g/d) 30.84±12.27 41.84±30.70 28.29±15.98 <0.001
Cholesterol (mg/d) 575.00±429.48 734.09±493.12 337.14±189.17 <0.001
Vitamin A (RAE/d) 1990.55±3107.12 2644.46±3798.56 771.79±1026.00 <0.001
Vitamin E (mg/d) 20.91±6.44 31.01±25.97 20.56±4.59 <0.001
Vitamin B6 (mg/d) 3.17±1.26 3.45±1.48 2.69±1.10 <0.001
Vitamin B9 (µg/d) 921.13±383.88 1114.12±525.87 838.99±460.87 <0.001
Vitamin B12 (µg/d) 20.15±31.34 26.59±38.69 7.88±10.39 <0.001
Vitamin C (mg/d) 163.97±89.04 184.25±139.58 141.01±87.32 <0.001
Calcium (mg/d) 1750.13±991.44 2018.51±937.35 1251.55±648.42 <0.001
Magnesium (mg/d) 728.35±315.69 842.36±355.81 699.56±335.77 0.001
Selenium (mg/d) 244.61±131.48 280.91±135.87 229.26±130.77 0.005
Zinc (mg/d) 23.04±10.39 16.11±11.45 20.65±10.58 <0.001
Iron (mg/d) 32.76±15.34 39.66±19.22 30.37±15.57 <0.001
Foods items        
Whole grains (g/d) 73.19±139.65 140.10±186.86 211.85±245.67 <0.001
Refined grains (g/d) 716.41±368.30 693.83±396.47 531.64±369.62 <0.001
Total fruits (g/d) 360.44±232.16 400.56±316.73 383.74±218.27 0.42
Total vegetables (g/d) 361.70±345.12 441.92±329.94 294.71±187.29 <0.001
Legumes (g/d) 99.02±98.10 115.47±107.43 101.27±130.06 0.42
Nuts (g/d) 39.96±58.52 48.74±69.06 37.72±79.25 0.39
Dairy (g/d) 677.28±640.04 672.95±437.33 297.67±231.54 <0.001
Total protein foods (g/d) 320.79±182.34 373.66±204.30 291.29±201.32 0.003
Added sugars (g/d) 277.65±251.08 482.37±809.89 115.38±128.65 <0.001

SFA, saturated fatty acid; PUFA: polyunsaturated fatty acid; MUFA; monounsaturated fatty acid.

Values are mean ± SE.

All values are adjusted for energy intake using ANCOVA.

Table 2 displays the participants’ energy-adjusted dietary nutrient and food items intakes by tertiles of HEI. Participants in the last tertile of HEI had higher intake of energy and whole grains but lower intake of carbohydrate, protein, fat, SFA, MUFA, PUFA, cholesterol, viitamin A, E, B6 , B9 , B12, C, calcium, magnesium, selenium, zinc, iron, refined grains, total vegetables, dairy, total protein foods and added sugars. Intakes of total fruits, legume and nuts did not differ in HEI score tertiles.

Table 3. Mean sperm parameters across tertiles of HEI scores.

Variable HEI
T1 (N=136) T2 (N=131) T3 (N=130) P-value
Volume (ml)        
Model IIa 3.76±1.88d 3.59±1.62 3.39±1.73 0.22
Model IIb 3.76±1.88 3.59±1.62 3.39±1.73 0.06
Model IIc 3.76±1.88 3.59±1.62 3.39±1.73 0.02
Density (×106/ml)        
Model Ia 44.78±33.55 41.38±35.21 37.29±31.97 0.19
Model IIb 44.78±33.55 41.38±35.21 37.29±31.97 0.72
Model IIIc 44.78±33.55 41.38±35.21 37.29±31.97 0.49
Total motility (%)        
Model Ia 42.94±15.30 41.33±15.30 39.73±18.03 0.27
Model IIb 42.94±15.30 41.33±15.30 39.73±18.03 0.53
Model IIIc 42.94±15.30 41.33±15.30 39.73±18.03 0.55

a Crude.

b Adjusted for age and energy intake.

c Additionally adjusted for BMI, physical activity, educational and smoking history.

d These values are mean (SE).

e Using ANCOVA.

Table 3 displays the mean and standard deviation (SD) of sperm parameters in crude and modified models for each tertile of HEI. For the HEI, participants in the highest tertile had not difference mean of sperm parameters with those in the lowest tertile in the crude model. In addition, after adjustment for potential covariates such as age, energy intake, BMI, physical activity, educational and smoking history, difference was not significant except in volume parameter.

Table 4. Crude and multivariable-adjusted odds ratios and 95% CIs for sperm parameters rs across tertiles of HEI scores.

Variable HEI
T1 (N=136) T2 (N=131) T3 (N=130) P-value
Volume (ml)        
Model Ia 1 0.87 (0.45, 1.71)d 1.29 (0.69, 2.42) 0.41
Model IIb 1 0.95 (0.47, 1.88) 1.42 (0.73, 2.74) 0.28
Model IIIc 1 1.05 (0.52, 2.14) 1.69 (0.82, 3.47) 0.18
Density (×106/ml)        
Model Ia 1 1.67 (0.99, 2.84) 1.69 (1.00, 2.88) 0.05
Model IIb 1 1.21 (0.69, 2.13) 1.15 (0.65, 2.03) 0.63
Model IIIc 1 1.20 (0.67, 2.16) 1.31 (0.71, 2.40) 0.38
Total motility (%)        
Model Ia 1 1.58 (0.95, 2.64) 1.31 (0.78, 2.21) 0.29
Model IIb 1 1.13 (0.65, 1.95) 0.86 (0.49, 1.52) 0.59
Model IIIc 1 1.19 (0.67, 2.09) 0.92 (0.50, 1.67) 0.74

a Crude.

b Adjusted for age and energy intake.

c Additionally adjusted for BMI, physical activity, educational and smoking history.

d These values are odd ratio (95% CIs).

e Obtained from logistic regression.

 Table 4 displays the multivariable-adjusted odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for sperm parameters throughout tertiles of HEI. There was significant associationbetween sperm density and HEI score tertile in crude model but after adjustment for potential confounders including age, energy intake, BMI, physical activity, educational and smoking history there was not any association. Participants in highest tertile had a higher risk of density and lower risk of motility in crude model (OR =1.69; 95% CI: 1.00, 2.88; P=0.05 and OR=1.31; 95% CI: 0.78, 2.21; P=0.29) and risk of density (OR=1.15; 95% CI: 0.65, 2.03; P=0.63 and OR=1.31; 95% CI: 0.71, 2.40; P=0.38) and motility decrease in adjusted models (OR=0.86; 95% CI: 0.49, 1.52; P=0.59 and OR=0.92; 95% CI: 0.50, 1.67; P=0.74).


This cross-sectional study demonstrated that, in the third tertile compared to first tertile of HEI, risk of density and motility of sperms increased, and in fact adherence to HEI principles can have a positive effect on men’s fertility. But according to our result higher scores of HEI can be related to lower volume of sperm.

So far, most studies investigated the effect of a specific food or small group of foods on sperm indexes, and there is lack of priori studies on this issue. While priori studies are highly reliable methods and are based on acceptable standards, also in other topics, such as anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects [18,19], prevention of chronic diseases and even mortality, there are proven results [20,21], but still effect of dietary pattern on reproductivity is unknown and the aim of current study was to evaluate the potential relationship between HEI score and reproductive ability in men.

The results of previous studies were similar to our study, Efrat et al reported that higher quartiles of HEI was connected with higher sperm concentration and motility, also they claimed that more adherence to Alternative Healthy Eating Index (AHEI) could have positive effect on sperm count, concentration, normal morphology and motility [22]. Cutillas Tolin et al., only showed that men with higher scores of AHEI had lower abstinence time compared to others [23]. In general, review and meta-analysis studies have concluded that men with healthy diet patterns (more consumption of total grains, fruits, vegetables, chicken and fish and less intake of fat and red meat) have better seminal quality [24,25]. In a cross-sectional study that evaluated food patterns of 188 young men, reported that more consumption of fish, whole grain, fruits and vegetables had positive correlation with sperm motility [26].

Several possible mechanisms can contribute to the positive effects of healthy dietary patterns on male fertility, first consumption of fruits and vegetables due to high antioxidant content can have a protective effect on the quality of sperm [27,28]. Even, receiving adequate antioxidants through regimen or supplements is considered as one method of infertility treatment, and according to various studies, between 11% and 41% increase the pregnancy rate [29]. Second, less intake of refined cereals, fats and processed meat is associated with better semen quality [8,30]. The third and maybe most probable cause is, the fact that adherence healthy food patterns is associated with a lower risk of chronic diseases, for example, Fung T et al in their study proved that high AHEI scores is connected with less risk of chronic diseases such as Diabetes and cardiovascular disease (CVD) [31,32]. Meanwhile, obesity and overweight are one of the most important chronic diseases that have a reverse relationship with physical and molecular characteristics of sperms [33]. In addition, excess adipose tissue can cause changes in the level of hormones and reduces testosterone conversion to estradiol, which leads to hypogonadism and inhibition of reproductive axes [34].

Among our limitations in this study was, due to the type of design that was cross-sectional observational study, we cannot prove a causal relationship between the diet and fertility in men. In order to evaluate the diet of participants, the FFQ questionnaire specialized for Iranian populations has been used, although it is among the most reliable methods, but depends on the personal memory of the individual and causes some errors in their report. And we used one semen sample to evaluate sperm indices, which reported that it’s an appropriate and sufficient tool in epidemiological studies. The most important strength point of recent study is to investigate new and principal issue, and applied dietary pattern that better represent the food intake of individuals. We also had access to appropriate infertile men as our population that was carefully examined in terms of including and excluding criteria to decrease selection bias and the results were also adjusted for confounders because of more accuracy of data.



Ethical Approval and Consent to participate

The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences code IR.MUI.RESEARC H.REC.1398.264.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


F.H, R.Gh designed the study and developed the protocol. F.H, R.Gh, KL, OS were involved in developing the search string and conducted the literature search. MN,OS conducted primary and secondary screening. FH, R.Gh wrote the first draft of the paper. All authors critically revised all drafts of the paper and approved the final version.


The author of the article would like to thank all the participants in this project. We knowledge of the researchers of Yazd Reproduction Research for providing data from this study.


1. Huang C, Li B, Xu K, Liu D, Hu J, Yang Y, et al. Decline in semen qualitamong 30,636 young Chinese men from 2001 to 2015. Fertil Steril. 2017; 107: 83-88.

2. Mohammad K, Ardalan A. An overview of the epidemiology of primary infertility in Iran. J Reprod Infertil. 2009; 10: 213-216.

3. Zhou Z, Zheng D, Wu H, Li R, Xu S, Kang Y, et al. Epidemiology of infertility in China: a population?based study. BJOG. 2018; 125: 432- 441.

4. Medicine PC of ASR. Diagnostic evaluation of the infertile male: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2015; 103: e18-e25.

5. Durairajanayagam D. Lifestyle causes of male infertility. Arab J Urol. 2018; 16: 10-20.

6. Leaver RB. Male infertility: an overview of causes and treatment options. Br J Nurs. 2016; 25: S35-S40.

7. Punab M, Poolamets O, Paju P, Vihljajev V, Pomm K, Ladva R, et al. Causes of male infertility: a 9-year prospective monocentre study on 1737 patients with reduced total sperm counts. Hum Reprod. 2017; 32: 18-31.

8. Eslamian G, Amirjannati N, Rashidkhani B, Sadeghi MR, Hekmatdoost A. Intake of food groups and idiopathic asthenozoospermia: a case– control study. Hum Reprod. 2012; 27: 3328-3336.

9. Maldonado-Cárceles AB, Mínguez-Alarcón L, Mendiola J, Vioque J, Jørgensen N, Árense-Gonzalo JJ, et al. Meat intake in relation to semen quality and reproductive hormone levels among young men in Spain. Br J Nutr. 2019; 121: 451-460.

10. Mendiola J, Torres-Cantero AM, Moreno-Grau JM, Ten J, Roca M, Moreno-Grau S, et al. Food intake and its relationship with semen quality: a case-control study. Fertil Steril. 2009; 91: 812-818.

11. Nassan FL, Chavarro JE, Tanrikut C. Diet and men’s fertility: does diet affect sperm quality? Fertil Steril. 2018; 110: 570-577.

12. Andersen JM, Rønning PO, Herning H, Bekken SD, Haugen TB, Witczak O, et al. Fatty acid composition of spermatozoa is associated with BMI and with semen quality. Andrology. 2016; 4: 857-865.

13. Lee PH, Macfarlane DJ, Lam TH, Stewart SM. Validity of the international physical activity questionnaire short form (IPAQ-SF): A systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011; 8: 115.

14. Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 2000; 894: 1-253.

15. Asghari G, Rezazadeh A, Hosseini-Esfahani F, Mehrabi Y, Mirmiran P, Azizi F, et al. Reliability, comparative validity and stability of dietary patterns derived from an FFQ in the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study. Br J Nutr. 2012; 108: 1109-1117.

16. Gottardo F, Kliesch S. Semen analysis: spermiogram according to WHO 2010 criteria. Urologe A. 2011; 50: 101-108.

17. Krebs-Smith SM, Pannucci TE, Subar AF, Kirkpatrick SI, Lerman JL, Tooze JA, et al. Update of the healthy eating index: HEI-2015. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018; 118: 1591-1602.

18. Fung TT, McCullough ML, Newby P, Manson JE, Meigs JB, Rifai N, et al. Diet-quality scores and plasma concentrations of markers of inflammation and endothelial dysfunction. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005; 82: 163-173.

19. Trichopoulou A, Costacou T, Bamia C, Trichopoulos D. Adherence to a Mediterranean diet and survival in a Greek population. N Engl J Med. 2003; 348: 2599-3608.

20. Mattei J, Sotos-Prieto M, Bigornia SJ, Noel SE, Tucker KL. The Mediterranean diet score is more strongly associated with favorable cardiometabolic risk factors over 2 years than other diet quality indexes in Puerto Rican adults. J Nutr. 2017; 147: 661-669.

21. Jacobs S, Harmon BE, Boushey CJ, Morimoto Y, Wilkens LR, Le Marchand L, et al. A priori-defined diet quality indexes and risk of type 2 diabetes: the Multiethnic Cohort. Diabetologia. 2015; 58: 98- 112.

22. Efrat M, Stein A, Pinkas H, Unger R, Birk R. Dietary patterns are positively associated with semen quality. Fertil Steril. 2018; 109: 809-816.

23. Cutillas-Tolín A, Adoamnei E, Navarrete-Muñoz EM, Vioque J, Moñino-García M, Jørgensen N, et al. Adherence to diet quality indices in relation to semen quality and reproductive hormones in young men. Hum Reprod. 2019; 34: 1866-1875.

24. Salas-Huetos A, Bulló M, Salas-Salvadó J. Dietary patterns, foods and nutrients in male fertility parameters and fecundability: a systematic review of observational studies. Hum Reprod Update. 2017; 23: 371- 389.

25. Arab A, Rafie N, Mansourian M, Miraghajani M, Hajianfar H. Dietary patterns and semen quality: a systematic review and meta?analysis of observational studies. Andrology. 2018; 6: 20-28.

26. Gaskins AJ, Colaci DS, Mendiola J, Swan SH, Chavarro JE. Dietary patterns and semen quality in young men. Hum Reprod. 2012;

27: 2899-2907. 27. Vujkovic M, de Vries JH, Lindemans J, Macklon NS, van der Spek PJ, Steegers EAP, et al. The preconception Mediterranean dietary pattern in couples undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment increases the chance of pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 2010; 94: 2096-2101.

28. Cutillas-Tolín A, Mínguez-Alarcón L, Mendiola J, López-Espín JJ, Jørgensen N, Navarrete-Muñoz EM, et al. Mediterranean and western dietary patterns are related to markers of testicular function among healthy men. Hum Reprod. 2015; 30: 2945-2955.

29. Suliga E, G?uszek S. The relationship between diet, energy balance and fertility in men. Int J Vitam Nutr Res. 2020; 90: 514-526.

30. Braga DPDAF, Halpern G, Rita de Cássia SF, Setti AS, Iaconelli Jr A, Borges Jr E, et al. Food intake and social habits in male patients and its relationship to intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes. Fertil Steril. 2012; 97: 53-59.

31. Chiuve SE, Fung TT, Rimm EB, Hu FB, McCullough ML, Wang M, et al. Alternative dietary indices both strongly predict risk of chronic disease. J Nutr. 2012; 142: 1009-1018.

32. Harmon BE, Boushey CJ, Shvetsov YB, Ettienne R, Reedy J, Wilkens LR, et al. Associations of key diet-quality indexes with mortality in the Multiethnic Cohort: the Dietary Patterns Methods Project. Am J Clin Nutr. 2015; 101: 587-597.

33. Katib A. Mechanisms linking obesity to male infertility. Cent European J Urol. 2015; 68: 79-85.

34. Martins AD, Moreira AC, Sá R, Monteiro MP, Sousa M, Carvalho RA, et al. Leptin modulates human Sertoli cells acetate production and glycolytic profile: a novel mechanism of obesity-induced male infertility? Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015; 1852: 1824-1832.

Haeri F, Sadrmanesh O, Leilami K, Nouri M, Ghiasvand R (2023) Healthy Eating Index and Semen Parameters in Iranian Infertile Men. J Hum Nutr Food Sci 11(2): 1164.

Received : 25 Apr 2023
Accepted : 28 Jun 2023
Published : 28 Jun 2023
Annals of Otolaryngology and Rhinology
ISSN : 2379-948X
Launched : 2014
JSM Schizophrenia
Launched : 2016
Journal of Nausea
Launched : 2020
JSM Internal Medicine
Launched : 2016
JSM Hepatitis
Launched : 2016
JSM Oro Facial Surgeries
ISSN : 2578-3211
Launched : 2016
JSM Regenerative Medicine and Bioengineering
ISSN : 2379-0490
Launched : 2013
JSM Spine
ISSN : 2578-3181
Launched : 2016
Archives of Palliative Care
ISSN : 2573-1165
Launched : 2016
JSM Nutritional Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3203
Launched : 2017
Annals of Neurodegenerative Disorders
ISSN : 2476-2032
Launched : 2016
Journal of Fever
ISSN : 2641-7782
Launched : 2017
JSM Bone Marrow Research
ISSN : 2578-3351
Launched : 2016
JSM Mathematics and Statistics
ISSN : 2578-3173
Launched : 2014
Journal of Autoimmunity and Research
ISSN : 2573-1173
Launched : 2014
JSM Arthritis
ISSN : 2475-9155
Launched : 2016
JSM Head and Neck Cancer-Cases and Reviews
ISSN : 2573-1610
Launched : 2016
JSM General Surgery Cases and Images
ISSN : 2573-1564
Launched : 2016
JSM Anatomy and Physiology
ISSN : 2573-1262
Launched : 2016
JSM Dental Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1548
Launched : 2016
Annals of Emergency Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1017
Launched : 2016
Annals of Mens Health and Wellness
ISSN : 2641-7707
Launched : 2017
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Health Care
ISSN : 2576-0084
Launched : 2018
Journal of Chronic Diseases and Management
ISSN : 2573-1300
Launched : 2016
Annals of Vaccines and Immunization
ISSN : 2378-9379
Launched : 2014
JSM Heart Surgery Cases and Images
ISSN : 2578-3157
Launched : 2016
Annals of Reproductive Medicine and Treatment
ISSN : 2573-1092
Launched : 2016
JSM Brain Science
ISSN : 2573-1289
Launched : 2016
JSM Biomarkers
ISSN : 2578-3815
Launched : 2014
JSM Biology
ISSN : 2475-9392
Launched : 2016
Archives of Stem Cell and Research
ISSN : 2578-3580
Launched : 2014
Annals of Clinical and Medical Microbiology
ISSN : 2578-3629
Launched : 2014
JSM Pediatric Surgery
ISSN : 2578-3149
Launched : 2017
Journal of Memory Disorder and Rehabilitation
ISSN : 2578-319X
Launched : 2016
JSM Tropical Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2578-3165
Launched : 2016
JSM Head and Face Medicine
ISSN : 2578-3793
Launched : 2016
JSM Cardiothoracic Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1297
Launched : 2016
JSM Bone and Joint Diseases
ISSN : 2578-3351
Launched : 2017
JSM Bioavailability and Bioequivalence
ISSN : 2641-7812
Launched : 2017
JSM Atherosclerosis
ISSN : 2573-1270
Launched : 2016
Journal of Genitourinary Disorders
ISSN : 2641-7790
Launched : 2017
Journal of Fractures and Sprains
ISSN : 2578-3831
Launched : 2016
Journal of Autism and Epilepsy
ISSN : 2641-7774
Launched : 2016
Annals of Marine Biology and Research
ISSN : 2573-105X
Launched : 2014
JSM Health Education & Primary Health Care
ISSN : 2578-3777
Launched : 2016
JSM Communication Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3807
Launched : 2016
Annals of Musculoskeletal Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3599
Launched : 2016
Annals of Virology and Research
ISSN : 2573-1122
Launched : 2014
JSM Renal Medicine
ISSN : 2573-1637
Launched : 2016
Journal of Muscle Health
ISSN : 2578-3823
Launched : 2016
JSM Genetics and Genomics
ISSN : 2334-1823
Launched : 2013
JSM Anxiety and Depression
ISSN : 2475-9139
Launched : 2016
Clinical Journal of Heart Diseases
ISSN : 2641-7766
Launched : 2016
Annals of Medicinal Chemistry and Research
ISSN : 2378-9336
Launched : 2014
JSM Pain and Management
ISSN : 2578-3378
Launched : 2016
JSM Women's Health
ISSN : 2578-3696
Launched : 2016
Clinical Research in HIV or AIDS
ISSN : 2374-0094
Launched : 2013
Journal of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Obesity
ISSN : 2333-6692
Launched : 2013
Journal of Substance Abuse and Alcoholism
ISSN : 2373-9363
Launched : 2013
JSM Neurosurgery and Spine
ISSN : 2373-9479
Launched : 2013
Journal of Liver and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2379-0830
Launched : 2014
Journal of Drug Design and Research
ISSN : 2379-089X
Launched : 2014
JSM Clinical Oncology and Research
ISSN : 2373-938X
Launched : 2013
JSM Bioinformatics, Genomics and Proteomics
ISSN : 2576-1102
Launched : 2014
JSM Chemistry
ISSN : 2334-1831
Launched : 2013
Journal of Trauma and Care
ISSN : 2573-1246
Launched : 2014
JSM Surgical Oncology and Research
ISSN : 2578-3688
Launched : 2016
Annals of Food Processing and Preservation
ISSN : 2573-1033
Launched : 2016
Journal of Radiology and Radiation Therapy
ISSN : 2333-7095
Launched : 2013
JSM Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
ISSN : 2578-3572
Launched : 2016
Annals of Clinical Pathology
ISSN : 2373-9282
Launched : 2013
Annals of Cardiovascular Diseases
ISSN : 2641-7731
Launched : 2016
Journal of Behavior
ISSN : 2576-0076
Launched : 2016
Annals of Clinical and Experimental Metabolism
ISSN : 2572-2492
Launched : 2016
Clinical Research in Infectious Diseases
ISSN : 2379-0636
Launched : 2013
JSM Microbiology
ISSN : 2333-6455
Launched : 2013
Journal of Urology and Research
ISSN : 2379-951X
Launched : 2014
Journal of Family Medicine and Community Health
ISSN : 2379-0547
Launched : 2013
Annals of Pregnancy and Care
ISSN : 2578-336X
Launched : 2017
JSM Cell and Developmental Biology
ISSN : 2379-061X
Launched : 2013
Annals of Aquaculture and Research
ISSN : 2379-0881
Launched : 2014
Clinical Research in Pulmonology
ISSN : 2333-6625
Launched : 2013
Journal of Immunology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2333-6714
Launched : 2013
Annals of Forensic Research and Analysis
ISSN : 2378-9476
Launched : 2014
JSM Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
ISSN : 2333-7109
Launched : 2013
Annals of Breast Cancer Research
ISSN : 2641-7685
Launched : 2016
Annals of Gerontology and Geriatric Research
ISSN : 2378-9409
Launched : 2014
Journal of Sleep Medicine and Disorders
ISSN : 2379-0822
Launched : 2014
JSM Burns and Trauma
ISSN : 2475-9406
Launched : 2016
Chemical Engineering and Process Techniques
ISSN : 2333-6633
Launched : 2013
Annals of Clinical Cytology and Pathology
ISSN : 2475-9430
Launched : 2014
JSM Allergy and Asthma
ISSN : 2573-1254
Launched : 2016
Journal of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
ISSN : 2334-2307
Launched : 2013
Annals of Sports Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2379-0571
Launched : 2014
JSM Sexual Medicine
ISSN : 2578-3718
Launched : 2016
Annals of Vascular Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2378-9344
Launched : 2014
JSM Biotechnology and Biomedical Engineering
ISSN : 2333-7117
Launched : 2013
Journal of Hematology and Transfusion
ISSN : 2333-6684
Launched : 2013
JSM Environmental Science and Ecology
ISSN : 2333-7141
Launched : 2013
Journal of Cardiology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2333-6676
Launched : 2013
JSM Nanotechnology and Nanomedicine
ISSN : 2334-1815
Launched : 2013
Journal of Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders
ISSN : 2475-9473
Launched : 2016
JSM Ophthalmology
ISSN : 2333-6447
Launched : 2013
Journal of Pharmacology and Clinical Toxicology
ISSN : 2333-7079
Launched : 2013
Annals of Psychiatry and Mental Health
ISSN : 2374-0124
Launched : 2013
Medical Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
ISSN : 2333-6439
Launched : 2013
Annals of Pediatrics and Child Health
ISSN : 2373-9312
Launched : 2013
JSM Clinical Pharmaceutics
ISSN : 2379-9498
Launched : 2014
JSM Foot and Ankle
ISSN : 2475-9112
Launched : 2016
JSM Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementia
ISSN : 2378-9565
Launched : 2014
Journal of Addiction Medicine and Therapy
ISSN : 2333-665X
Launched : 2013
Journal of Veterinary Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2378-931X
Launched : 2013
Annals of Public Health and Research
ISSN : 2378-9328
Launched : 2014
Annals of Orthopedics and Rheumatology
ISSN : 2373-9290
Launched : 2013
Journal of Clinical Nephrology and Research
ISSN : 2379-0652
Launched : 2014
Annals of Community Medicine and Practice
ISSN : 2475-9465
Launched : 2014
Annals of Biometrics and Biostatistics
ISSN : 2374-0116
Launched : 2013
JSM Clinical Case Reports
ISSN : 2373-9819
Launched : 2013
Journal of Cancer Biology and Research
ISSN : 2373-9436
Launched : 2013
Journal of Surgery and Transplantation Science
ISSN : 2379-0911
Launched : 2013
Journal of Dermatology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2373-9371
Launched : 2013
JSM Gastroenterology and Hepatology
ISSN : 2373-9487
Launched : 2013
Annals of Nursing and Practice
ISSN : 2379-9501
Launched : 2014
JSM Dentistry
ISSN : 2333-7133
Launched : 2013
Author Information X