Loading

Journal of Human Nutrition and Food Science

Nutritional Evaluation of Germinated and Fermented all Legume Mixed Protein Diets in Rats

Review Article | Open Access | Volume 5 | Issue 3

  • 1. Department of Food Science and Technology, Imo State University, Nigeria
  • 2. Department of Food Science and Technology, Ebonyi State University, Nigeria
+ Show More - Show Less
Corresponding Authors
Okorie SU, Department of Food Science and Technology, Imo State University, Owerri, Nigeria, Tel: 2349060903462
Abstract

Young male albino rats (74 -127g) were used to evaluate the nutritional quality of germinated, fermented and dried underutilized legumes: Canavalia ensiformis (jackbean), Mucuna vulgaris and Phaseolus vulgaris (red kidney bean). Six different diets were formulated respectively from the legumes and fed to thirty-six rats, which were divided into six groups of six rats per metabolic cage for 9-day nitrogen balance study in a 12-day study. Three day acclimatization was used during which time the rats were fed the normal rat chow and water ad-libitum. The diets were coded as red kidney bean germinated (48h), fermented (27h) and dried at 57.5°C (RGF 57.5), red kidney bean dried at 65°C (RKD 65), jackbean germinated (87h), fermented (87h) and dried at 57°C (JGF 57.5), jackbean dried at 65°C (JBD 65), Mucuna vulgaris germinated (62h), fermented (62h) and dried at 65°C (MGF 65) and Mucuna vulgaris dried at 65°C (MVD 65). At the end of the nine (9) day experimental feeding with the diets and water ad libitum, the result indicated that diet MVD 65 was most superior in all the performance and protein quality characteristics determined. This was evidenced in the fact that the highest food intake, digested nitrogen, nitrogen intake, weight gain, nitrogen balance and apparent digestibility (AD) of 12.25g, 0.955g, 1.176g, 43.42g, 0.884g and 81.227% were obtained using diet MVD 65. These values were significantly (p<0.05) higher than the values of the other diets. Net protein utilization (NPU) and Biological value (BV) using MGF 65 and RKD 65 diets were high (77.92% and 99.21%) respectively. Absorbed/digested nitrogen and retained nitrogen / nitrogen balance were comparable in values. The result tends to indicate that good quality protein diets can be produced from the mixed legumes.

Keywords
  • Nutritive quality
  • Germination
  • Fermentation
  • Legume
  • Protein diets
  • Rats

 

Citation

Okorie SU, Okaka JC (2017) Nutritional Evaluation of Germinated and Fermented all Legume Mixed Protein Diets in Rats. J Hum Nutr Food Sci 5(3): 11157.

INTRODUCTION

Grain legumes occupy an important place in the world’s traditional food and nutrition economy. Legumes form inexpensive sources of protein, carbohydrates, vitamins, minerals and polyunsaturated fatty [1] in human and animal food. Generally, protein in legume seeds represents about 20% (dry weight) in peas and beans, upto 38 – 40% in soy bean and lupin [2].

Despite the high nutrient content of the raw legumes, their utilization is impaired by long cooking time and by some inherent antinutrients such as trypsin inhibitors, tannins, phytates, hemagglutinins, saponins and flatulence factors [3,4]. There are other toxic factors that reduce the food value (such as protein digestibility) of these plant foods by binding with some digestive enzymes in the body system [5]. Cooking, germination, fermentation, dehulling, autoclaving, etc reduce these factors and at the same time improve the quality of human diet.

Weaning/complimentary foods have been developed from underutilized legumes to increase the nutritional status of these foods [6] and from maize, soybean, and fluted pumpkin blends [7]. It has been shown that legume proteins rich in lysine and tryptophan can complement the protein in cereal grains, rich in methionine and cystine since the chemical and nutritional characteristics of legumes make them natural complements to cereal based diets [8].

In Nigeria and other African and Asian countries, Canavalia ensiformis (jackbean) is considered as a non-conventional source of high protein (23.4%), carbohydrate (55%) and some minerals such as magnesium, copper, phosphorus, calcium, zinc and nickel [9,10].

Mucuna vulgaris is regarded as a legume with better potential to meet the increasing protein requirements of human and livestock industries at large, but remains untapped. Mucuna seeds as a rich source of protein supplement (ranging from 27 – 30%) and carbohydrate (42.32 -64.26%) in food and feed has been documented [11,12].

Phaseolus vulgaris (red kidney bean) is a known protein rich legume. The nutritional value per 100kg was indicated as protein (24g), fat (1g), carbohydrate (60g) and energy (1390kj). Dry beans are widely known for their fibre, mineral and protein contents [13].

The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the nutritional quality of germinated and fermented all-legume mixed protein diets using rats (Figure 1).

 Protein quality of all legume mixed diets fed to rats.

Figure 1: Protein quality of all legume mixed diets fed to rats.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Source of materials

Phaseolus vulgaris (red kidney bean) and Canavalia ensiformis (jackbean) were obtained from a farmer at Uburu in Oru East LGA, Imo State. Mucuna vulgaris was purchased at Edem market in Nsukka, Enugu State. Vitamin/mineral premix and corn starch were purchased at Gufon Veterinary Centre, Police shopping complex (fire service roundabout area), Owerri, Imo State. Oil (Sonuola soya oil brand) was purchased from Ekeukwu Market, Owerri, and Imo State. Albino rats were purchased from the Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, and Enugu State, Nigeria.

Preparation of the legume seeds

Phaseolus vulgaris (red kidney bean) and Canavalia ensiformis (jackbean) were cleaned and sorted to remove all foreign materials. After cleaning, they were soaked in distilled water for 12h and 6h respectively at room temperatures of 25°C. Mucuna vulgaris was soaked in distilled water for 24h at room temperature of 25°C and then stratified in hot water for 2-5min before being germinated.

Germination and fermentation of legume seeds

The hydrated legume seeds were placed separately in wetted jute bags and germinated at different time intervals of 12 – 104.0h (Tables 1 and 2).

Table 1: The coded values of the independent variables for Canavalia ensiformis (Jackbean) and Mucuna vulgaris.

   

 Codes 

     

Variables

-1.682

-1

0

1

1.682

X1 (h)

19.9552

37

62

87.1

104.45

X2(h)

19.9552

37

62

87.1

104.45

X3(0C)

52.3866

57.5

65

72.5

77.6134

 

Table 2: The coded values of the independent variables for Phaseolus vulgaris (Red Kidney bean).

 

 

 

Codes

   

Variables

-2

-1

0

1

2

X1 (h)

12

24

36

48

60

X2 (h)

12

27

42

57

72

X3 (0C)

50

57.5

65

72.5

80

The seeds were washed every 12h to prevent mould growth [14]. The germinated seeds were dehulled manually by rubbing the seeds multiple times with the palms to get them ready for fermentation.

The dehulled germinated seeds were later placed in deionised water in ratio of 1:3 (w/v) grams to water in covered labeled plastic containers of the same sizes. The seeds were allowed to ferment at varied time intervals of 12h to 104.0h using natural fermentation process (Tables 1 and 2). The fermented seeds were dried at different temperatures of 50°C to 80°C in a Hot Air Oven (Model AV-160) for 50mins. The dried seeds were respectively ground using Moulinex blender and sieved with 60mm mesh size to separate the fine sample flours from coarse particles. The flours were separately put in labeled plastic containers and stored in the refrigerator.

Experimental design

A central composite rotatable design (CCRD) for three variables germination, fermentation and drying was used to examine the response pattern in which twenty (20) variable combinations were obtained and used as experimental runs. The procedure described by Snedecor and Cochran (1980) was used. The combination runs of jackbean germinated (87h), fermented (87h) and dried at 57.5°C (JGF 57.5), jackbean dried at 65°C (JBD 65), Mucuna vulgaris germinated (62h), fermented (62h) and dried at 65°C (MGF 65), Mucuna vulgaris dried at 65°C (MVD 65), red kidney bean germinated (48h), fermented (27h) and dried at 57.5°C (RGF 57.5) and red kidney bean dried at 65°C (RKD 65) were used.

Diet formulation

The diets (6) were formulated from processed and unprocessed (raw) seed flours of Canavalia ensiformis (jackbean), Mucuna vulgaris and Phaseolus vulgaris (red kidney bean) respectively. The following combination runs of JGF 57.5, JBD 65, MGF 65, MVD 65, RGF 57.5 and RKD 65, which were used as the codes for the respective diets, were based on the fact that they had the highest protein values of 23.16%, 21.24%, 23.75%, 22.75%, 21.70% and 21.85% (Tables 1-4).

Table 3: The results of response surface analysis of the variation of proximate composition of Canavalia ensiformis flour with germination time, fermentation time, and drying temperature.

Runs

GT

(h)

FT

(h)

DT

(0C)

Protein (%)

Fat

(%)

Fibre (%)

Ash (%)

Moisture (%)

CHO (%)

1

37

37

57.5

12.473

3.126

4.744

3.382

6.93

69.345

2

87

37

57.5

23.120

3.606

5.725

3.489

6.51

57.35

3

37

87

57.5

12.488

3.445

5.376

3.405

5.585

69.701

4

87

87

57.5

23.160

2.772

5.907

4.607

6.174

57.184

5

37

37

72.5

12.504

3.279

4.816

3.311

6.512

69.578

6

87

37

72.5

23.13

3.492

5.915

3.684

5.23

58.349

7

37

87

72.5

12.484

3.39

5.37

3.476

5.594

69.686

8

87

87

72.5

23.051

2.446

5.934

4.629

5.49

58.164

9

19.95518

62

65

16.742

3.109

5.322

3.482

6.19

75.155

10

104.0448

62

65

23.087

2.351

6.499

4.714

6.136

58.213

11

62

19.95518

65

20.908

3.125

5.335

3.372

6.905

60.355

12

62

104.0448

65

20.905

2.464

5.958

4.613

5.855

60.205

13

62

62

52.38655

20.876

4.094

5.235

3.294

5.953

60.548

14

62

62

77.61345

20.909

3.721

5.103

3.681

5.051

61.535

15

62

62

65

20.912

4.119

5.125

3.582

6.025

60.237

16

62

62

65

20.909

4.124

5.033

3.618

6.016

60.3

17

62

62

65

20.894

4.111

5.102

3.507

6.174

60.212

18

62

62

65

20.901

4.13

5.111

3.592

6.043

60.223

19

62

62

65

20.897

4.106

5.109

3.601

6.076

60.211

20

62

62

65

20.910

4.127

5.133

3.424

6.064

60.342

The protein, fat, fibre, ash, moisture and carbohydrate contents of Canavalia ensiformis flour dried at 650C (JBD 65) and used for the study prior to processing treatment were 21.24%, 4.19%, 5.74%, 4.0%, 6.15% and 58.62% respectively.

CHO       =              Carbohydrate

GT          =              Germination time

FT           =              Fermentation time

DT          =              Drying time

 

Table 4: The results of response surface analysis of the variation of proximate composition of Mucuna vulgaris flour with germination time, fermentation time and drying temperature.

Runs

GT

(h)

FT

(h)

DT

(0C)

Protein (%)

Fat

(%)

Fibre (%)

Ash (%)

Moisture (%)

CHO (%)

1

37

37

57.5

18.856

1.870

3.309

2.785

10.029

63.152

2

87

37

57.5

20.676

1.455

3.278

3.886

9.739

60.965

3

37

87

57.5

21.398

1.450

3.603

3.816

10.434

59.298

4

87

87

57.5

21.687

1.306

4.290

3.781

9.976

58.960

5

37

37

72.5

19.358

1.896

4.642

2.405

12.984

58.715

6

87

37

72.5

21.396

1.693

3.036

4.050

12.253

57.572

7

37

87

72.5

21.593

1.621

5.659

4.070

13.534

53.523

8

87

87

72.5

21.865

1.622

4.793

4.023

12.826

54.872

9

19.95518

62

65

20.112

1.752

4.209

2.918

11.583

59.426

10

104.0448

62

65

22.209

1.433

4.101

4.282

10.878

57.098

11

62

19.95518

65

20.149

1.749

4.167

2.896

10.472

60.567

12

62

104.0448

65

22.987

1.418

5.642

4.361

12.098

53.494

13

62

62

52.38655

20.777

1.414

2.045

3.352

8.756

63.656

14

62

62

77.61345

20.989

1.790

4.040

3.865

13.508

55.809

15

62

62

65

21.009

1.551

3.209

3.693

10.488

60.050

16

62

62

65

21.061

1.582

3.538

3.688

10.113

60.017

17

62

62

65

21.030

1.486

3.716

3.711

10.512

59.545

18

62

62

65

23.750

1.590

3.663

3.662

10.475

59.561

19

62

62

65

21.026

1.468

3.366

3.611

10.216

60.313

20

62

62

65

21.201

1.495

3.605

3.444

10.518

59.738

The protein, fat, fibre, ash, moisture and carbohydrate contents of Mucuna vulgaris flour dried at 650C (MVD 65) and used for the study prior to processing treatment were 22.75%, 1.87%, 4.06%, 3.91%, 11.47% and 55.94% respectively.

 CHO     =              Carbohydrate

GT          =              Germination time

FT           =              Fermentation time

DT          =              Drying time

Corn starch, vitamin/ mineral premix and 5% oil were added to the legume flours and thoroughly mixed differently in a dough mixer (Hobert 2000, England) for 30min (Okaka, 1997) to obtain six all-legume mixed protein diets of fine consistency. The corn starch was added to dilute the protein. The diets provided 10% dietary protein for the entire period of the nitrogen balance study. The diets were each put in labeled plastic containers and stored in a freezer until required for feeding (Table 5,6).

Table 5: The results of response surface analysis of the variation of proximate composition of Phaseolus vulgaris flour with germination time, fermentation time and drying temperature.

Runs

GT

(h)

FT

(h)

DT (0C)

Protein (%)

Fat (%)

Fibre (%)

Ash (%)

Moisture (%)

CHO

(%)

1

24

27

57.5

20.65

2.75

4.38

3.17

9.24

59.81

2

48

27

57.5

21.70

3.16

4.20

3.14

8.40

61.37

3

24

57

57.5

19.45

2.90

4.21

3.20

9.96

60.28

4

48

57

57.5

20.16

3.02

4.09

3.06

9.24

60.43

5

24

27

72.5

19.70

3.08

4.15

3.17

9.46

60.44

6

48

27

72.5

20.44

2.84

4.24

3.14

8.16

61.18

7

24

57

72.5

19.78

3.05

4.21

3.20

9.40

60.36

8

48

57

72.5

21.31

3.08

3.92

3.18

8.28

60.23

9

12

42

65

21.44

2.76

4.23

2.97

11.21

57.39

10

60

42

65

21.29

2.82

4.17

3.23

10.87

57.62

11

36

12

65

21.03

2.60

4.09

3.13

10.17

58.98

12

36

72

65

21.56

2.86

3.91

3.17

9.80

58.70

13

36

42

50

21.27

2.70

4.11

2.97

11.23

57.72

14

36

42

80

20.44

2.82

4.17

2.92

10.30

59.35

15

36

42

65

21.59

2.91

4.96

3.07

10.80

56.67

16

36

42

65

20.56

2.92

4.13

3.11

9.29

59.99

17

36

42

65

21.01

2.84

4.19

3.09

10.72

58.15

18

36

42

65

21.03

2.96

4.17

3.03

10.23

58.58

19

36

42

65

21.03

2.98

4.17

3.03

10.20

58.59

20

36

42

65

21.00

2.89

4.15

3.02

10.22

58.58

The protein, fat, fibre, ash, moisture and carbohydrate contents of Phaseolus vulgaris flour dried at 650C (RKD 65) and used for the study prior to processing treatment were 21.85%, 2.78%, 4.26%, 3.20%, 8.77% and 59.10% respectively.

 CHO     =              Carbohydrate

GT          =              Germination time

FT           =              Fermentation time

DT          =              Drying time

 

Table 6: Composition of the formulated diets.

Ingredient (g/kg)

JGF 57.5

JBD 65

MGF 65

MVD 65

RGF 57.5

RKD 65

Corn starch

740.48

684.77

755.92

729.27

698.65

703.20

Fat (5%)

72.00

72.00

72.00

72.00

72.00

72.00

Protein (10%)

621.76

677.67

606.32

632.97

663.50

659.04

Vitamin/mineral premix

5.76

5.76

5.76

5.76

5.76

5.76

Total

1440

1440

1440

1440

1440

1440

Calculation of the recipe for diet JGF 57.5

To obtain the total grams of diet to be consumed daily by the rats, assume that 20g of diet will be consumed daily by rats in a cage and for 12 days.

∴ 20g X 12 days X 6 rats = 1440g of diet.

1. The value of processed Jackbean (JGF 57.5- that is Jackbean germinated for 87h, fermented for 87h and dried at 57.5°C) (Table 3) used for the diet formulation = 23.16%

The gram of diet JGF 57.5 was obtained based on 10% dietary protein level.

Let x = the gram of Jackbean’s protein

Using % protein of processed Jackbean = 10% dietary protein level

100% Unknown gram (x) of jackbean’s protein

∴ 23.16 = 10%

100 x

x = 1000 = 43.18g

23.16

If 100g of protein in JGF 57.5 is required for the production of 1440g of the diet

∴ 1440 X 43.18 = 621.76g of the protein of diet JGF 57.5

100 1

2) Let the percentage of fat (Oil) used be 5%

If 100% of the oil was required by 1440g of diet

∴ 5% of the oil will be required by 1440 X 5g

100 1 = 72g of oil

3) Vitamin/Mineral Premix

If 250g of the diet was required by 1g of vitamin/mineral premix

∴ 1440g of diet will require 1440g of vitamin/mineral premix 250 =5.76g of vitamin/mineral premix

4) Corn starch was obtained by subtracting the total values of the ingredients from the total value of the diet per day by the six rats.

∴Corn starch = [1440 – (621.76 + 72 + 5.76)]
                      = [1440 – 694.336]
                      = 740.48

Experimental feeding of rats

The 36 rats, 6 per a labeled stainless metabolic cage were divided into 6 groups. Each group of rats was fed a particular formulated diet from the 3 different legumes. The metabolism cage was to separate the urine from the faeces. The rats were weighed prior to access to their respective diets and everyday to evaluate the body weight change. The feeding was daily with water ad-libitum for the entire 9-day nitrogen (N) balance study period. At the end of feeding on the 9th day, the rats were sacrificed and on evacuation of the internal organs, the liver was carefully removed, weighed and dried in a hot air oven drier (70- 75°C) for 14 – 16h and the weight taken again. One (1) gram of the liver was mixed with 10ml Tris-HCL buffer solution pH 7.5, crushed with mortar and pestle and the paste filtered for 15 min [14]. The supernatant was stored at room temperature (27°C) for analysis. A 0.05g of carmine red powder was introduced into the diets and fed the rats on the mornings of day 1 as well as day 9. Coloured faeces appeared on day 2 and day 10 and other procedures followed were according to Obizoba (1983) [16].

The experimental rats were fed equal weights (20g) of their respective diets and water ad-libitum. Reminants of diets, urine and faeces were collected daily throughout the entire 9-day period and recorded. The daily food intakes mean weight gains were also recorded and data generated were used to estimate protein quality such as Nitrogen (N) intake and Biological Value (BV), Net Protein Utilization (NPU), Apparent Digestibility (AD) and nitrogen retention.

Analysis of nitrogen

Urinary nitrogen, faecal nitrogen and liver nitrogen were analyzed according to the method of AOAC (2005) [17].

Statistical analysis

The data obtained for the protein quality indices and performance characteristics were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) at 5% level. The test for significant differences between the means was carried out using the multiple range tests [18].

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Performance characteristics

The result from the work on the all-legume protein mixed diets is shown in Table 2. The group diet Mucuna vulgaris dried at 65°C (MVD 65) was highly (12.25g) consumed by the rats (Table 7). The diet least (5.039g) consumed was red kidney bean germinated 48h, fermented 27h and dried at 57.5°C (RGF 57.5). Chikwendu and Obizoba (2003) [19] reported that food intake is associated with nitrogen source, palatability, flavor and essential amino acids rather than the level of nitrogen [20] also maintained that growth rate in experimental rats is influenced by the amount of diet consumed. The fact that there were higher food intakes, showed that the food had the necessary nutrients required by the rats for growth or that the nitrogen balance study revealed the food growth – promoting quality of the diets without minding if germination or fermentation treatment was given to the legumes (Table 7).

Table 7: Performance characteristics of rats fed all legume mixed protein diets.

Parameters

RGF 57.5

RKD 65

JGF 57.5

JBD 65

MGF 65

MVD 65

LSD

Food intake (g)

5.02e + 0.173

7.11d + 0.981

8.27c + 0.236

7.03d + 0.288

11.31b + 0.271

12.17a + 0.144

0.134

Weight gain (g)

10.62f +  0.536

23.20d + 0.173

28.48c + 0.421

16.28e + 0.248

33.32b + 0.560

43.14a + 0.121

0.314

Faecal Nitrogen (g)

0.2064

0.2112

0.219

0.2220

0.2290

0.2208

-

N intake (g)

0.483d + 0.058

0.688c + 0.0081

0.808b + 0.0035

0.677c + 0.045

1.108a + 0.0078

1.176a + 0.013

0.094

Urinary N (g)

0.0113

0.004

0.022

0.0150

0.0157

0.071

-

Absorbed N/

digested N (g)

0.2766 + 0.012

0.4768 + 0.058

0.589 + 0.0098

0.455 + 0.008

0.879 + 0.043

0.955 + 0.015

0.145

Retained N/N

balance (g)

0.2653c + 0.072

0.473bc + 0.052

0.567b + 0.058

0.440bc + 0.017

0.8633a + 0.05

0.884a + 0.09

0.288

Liver Nitrogen (%)

9.57c ± 0.172

10.24bc ± 0.471

12.21a ± 0.513

12.47a ± 0.135

12.72a ± 0.134

11.33bc ± 0.246

1.394

Liver weight (dry) (g)

0.64b ± 0.040

0.90 ± 0.084

1.16ab ± 0.150

1.20a ± 0.164

1.30a ± 0.084

1.20a ± 0.173

0.550

Mean + SEM of 3 replications

Means with different superscript within the same row differ significantly (p < 0.05)

RGF 57.5 = Red Kidney bean germinated for 48h, fermented for 27h and dried at 57.5oC

RKD 65 = Red kidney bean dried at 650C

JGF 57.5 – Jackbean germinated for 87h, fermented for 87h and dried at 57.50C

JBD 65 = Jackbean dried at 650C

MGF 65 = Mucuna vulgaris germinated for 62h. Fermented for 62h and dried at 650C

MVD 65 = Mucuna vulgaris dried at 650C

Food intake from the result showed a varied influence on the weight gain. The rats that consumed more had increased weight gain as the values varied form 10.96 – 43.42g in diets RGF 57.5 to MVD 65 while rats that consumed the least diet also significantly (p<0.05) gained the least weight [21,22]. The gain in weight in rats fed the group diets showed that the diets contained good quality amino acids which the rats utilized. Food intake determines the level of nitrogen intake in the body. Increased food intake as a result of feeding the rats with diets MGF 65 and MVD 65 was an indication of increased nitrogen intake and nitrogen balance/ retained nitrogen as reflected in the values of 1.108g and 1.176g and 0.8633g and 0.884g respectively.

The lower digested/absorbed nitrogen of 0.2766g by the rats that consumed diet red kidney bean germinated 48h, fermented 27h and dried at 57.5°C (RGF 57.5) was due to the fact that the nitrogen intake was lower when compared to the other test diets. However, the lower digested nitrogen of RGF 57.5 may be attributed to lower apparent digestibility (AD) value of 57.27% obtained by rats that consumed the group diet. In other words, the lower nitrogen intake influenced absorbed/digested nitrogen which made it to be lower.

The lower (0.2653g, 0.473g and 0.440g) values of retained nitrogen/nitrogen balance of rats that consumed diets RGF 57.5, RKD 65 and JBD 65 were expected since the rats had lower nitrogen intake values than the other diets. However, the retained nitrogen/nitrogen balance and the absorbed nitrogen/digested nitrogen were comparable (p>0.05) in values in all the diets fed the rats (Table 7). The rats that consumed diets RGF 57.5 and RKD 65 also had lower (9.57% and 10.24%) liver nitrogen.

The liver weight was highest (1.30g) and significant (p0.05) in values of liver weight. The low liver weight of rats fed diet RGF 57.5 was comparable to the works of Anyika (1988) [23] who compared the supplementary effect of soaked bambara groundnut and sorghum and Obizoba (1985) [24] who also compared the supplementary effect of crayfish and brown bean to rice protein. The low liver weight value might be attributed to low food intake, low weight gain, low nitrogen (N) intake and apparent digestibility (AD), poor nitrogen absorption and utilization.

Protein quality

The measurement of the efficiency of the absorbed nitrogen/ nitrogen balance is known as Biological value (BV) [25]. The biological value (BV) of 92.56% - 99.21% for the rats was higher than the recommended value of 75% for children [26]. The higher BV was affected by higher food intake and higher nitrogen intake. The BV of a protein is related to the amount of the protein that is retained. This quantity accounts for growth and the healthy maintenance of the animal [27]. The decreased urinary excretion even reduced Net Protein Utilization (NPU) as well as AD and Nitrogen balance of rats that consumed diet RGF 57.5. The discussion was further depicted in Fig 1. The highest (92.21%) BV was in diet RKD65 and the lowest (92.56%) in diet MVD65. Diet MGF65 had the highest (77.92%) NPU value while diet RGF 57.5 had the lowest (54.93%) value. The highest (81.22%) AD value was in diet MVD65 and the lowest (57.27%) in diet RGF57.5. Biological value (BV) is always greater than NPU as indicated by the rats that consumed the group diets. The higher values of food intake, nitrogen intake, weight gain, nitrogen balance, apparent digestibility, NPU and biological value were significantly (p<0.05) influenced by the dietary treatments (protein intake) given to the rats during the 9-day nitrogen balance study. A protein material is regarded as nutritionally good in quality when its biological value (BV) is high (70 – 100%) [28,29].

REFERENCES

1. Chung H, Liu Q, Peter P, Ming Z, Richey Y. In vitro starch digestibility, expected glycemic index and some physiochemical properties of starch and flour from common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) varieties grown in Canada. Food Res Int. 2008; 111: 316 -321.

2. Duranti M. Grain Legume proteins and nutraceutical properties. Fitoterapia. 2006; 77: 67 - 82.

3. Osho SM. Soybean processing for house use in food crops production, utilization and nutrition. BN Mbah, DO Nnanyelugo (eds). Dotam Publ Ltd Ibadan. 1989; 68-78.

4. Fadahunsi IF, Sanni AI. Chemical and Biochemical changes in Bambara nut (Voandzeia subterranean L.) flours during fermentation to tempeh. Elect J Environ Agric Food Chem. 2010; 9: 275-283.

5. Agbede JO, Aletor VA. Comparative evaluation of weaning foods from Gliricidia and Leucaena leaf protein concentrates and some commercial brands in Nigeria. J Sci Food Agric. 2003; 84: 21- 30.

6. Ali-Asma M, EL Fadil, Babikar E, EL Tinay Abdullahi H. Development of weaning food from sorghum supplemented with legumes and oil seeds. Food Nutri Bull. 2006; 27: 26 -33.

7. Agu HO, Aluyah E. Production and chemical analysis of weaning food from maize, soybean and fluted pumpkin seed flour. Nigeria Food J. 2004; 22: 171- 177.

8. Altschul A M. New Protein Foods. Academic Press 1st Edn. 1974; 20- 23.

9. Bamiro FO, Tairu AO, Oderinde RA. The nutritive values of Nigerian Jackbeans (Canavalia ensiformis). La rivisita Heliana Delle Sastance citrasse. 1994; LXXI: 421- 424.

10. Liener IE. Implications of antinutritional components in soybean foods. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 1994; 34: 31- 67.

11. Siddhuraju P, Becker K. Preliminary evaluation of Mucuna seed meal (Mucuna pruriens var utilis) in common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.): An assessment by growth performance and feed utilization. Aquaculture. 2001; 196: 105-123.

12. Bressani R. Factors influencing nutritive value in food grain legumes: Mucuna in comparison to other grain legumes. In: Flores, editors. Mucuna as a Food and Feed: Current uses and the way forward. Proc. International Workshop held April 26- 29, 2000. Tegucigalpa, Houndras. 2002; 164- 188.

13. Dinelli G, Bonetti A, Minelli M, Marotti I, Catizone P, Mazanti A. Content of flavonols in Italian bean (Phaseolous vulgaris L) ecotypes. Food Chem. 2006; 99: 101-114.

14. Bau HB, Villanne G, Nicolos JP, Mejean L. Effects of germination on chemical composition, biochemical constituents and antinutritional factors of soybean (Glycine max) seeds. J Sci Food Agri. 1997; 73: 1-9.

15. Nwachukwu N, Nwite IN. Effect of diet formulated with two local spices on serum and hepatocyte of Wister rats. Nigeria J Nutri Sci. 2009; 30: 84-89.

16. Obizoba IC. Growth and Nitrogen utilization of rats fed pigeon pea-rice mixtures. Nigeria J Nutri Sci. 1983; 4: 35- 40.

17. AOAC. Official methods of Analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 17th Edn. Washington DC. 2005.

18. Steel RGD, Torrie HT. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. A Biometric Approach. 2nd edn, International Auckland; McGraw-Hill. 1981.

19. Chikwendu NJ, Obizoba IC. Nutritional evaluation of protein quality of ground bean (Kershingiella geocarpa) based diets. Nigeria J Nutri Sci. 2003; 24: 64- 68.

20. Akeredolu AA, Addo AA, Akeredolu OA. Clinical evaluation of Pearl Millet Conophor Weaning Mix as supplementary food for Nigerian children. Brazilian Arch Biol Technol. 2005; 48: 531- 536.

21. Ugwu FM, Ekwu FC, Okoye IC. Protein quality indices and Food intake pattern of parboiled and roasted breadfruit-corn diets. J Sci Agri Food Tech Envir. 2002; 2: 97- 100.

22. Oke DB, Oke MO, Adeyemi OA. Prediction of cowpea seed protein quality through total sulphur determination. In contributory role of animal production in national development (AO Fanimo and JA Olanite editors. Proc 7th Annual Conf of Animal Science of Nigeria, 16th19th Sept. University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria. 2002.

23. Anyika JU. The nutritive value of legume proteins supplemented with sorghum or crayfish. Unpublished B.Sc Project. Department of Home Science and Nutrition, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria. 1988.

24. Obizoba IC. Evaluation of the protein quality of rice supplemented with beans or crayfish. Plant food for Human nutri. 1985; 35: 43- 49.

25. Hackler LR. Methods of measuring protein quality: A review of bioassay procedures. Cer Chem. 1977; 54: 984 - 995.

26. PAG. Protein Advisory Group guideline. No. 8 Protein-rich mixtures for use as weaning foods. New York. FAO/WHO/UNICEF. 1971.

27. Pallet PL, Yeong VR. Nutritional evaluation of protein foods. The United Nation University, Tokyo. 1980.

28. Ijarotimi SO, Keshinro OO. Determination of nutrient composition and protein quality of potential complementary foods formulated from the combination of fermented popcorn, African locust bean and bambara groundnut see flour. Pol J Food Nutri Sci. 2013; 63: 155-166.

29. Okaka, JC, Potter NN. Physio-chemical and functional properties of cowpea powders processed to reduce beany flavour. J Food Sci. 1979; 44: 1233- 1240.

Okorie SU, Okaka JC (2017) Nutritional Evaluation of Germinated and Fermented all Legume Mixed Protein Diets in Rats. J Hum Nutr Food Sci 5(3): 11157.

Received : 28 Sep 2017
Accepted : 10 Nov 2017
Published : 13 Nov 2017
Journals
Annals of Otolaryngology and Rhinology
ISSN : 2379-948X
Launched : 2014
JSM Schizophrenia
Launched : 2016
Journal of Nausea
Launched : 2020
JSM Internal Medicine
Launched : 2016
JSM Hepatitis
Launched : 2016
JSM Oro Facial Surgeries
ISSN : 2578-3211
Launched : 2016
JSM Regenerative Medicine and Bioengineering
ISSN : 2379-0490
Launched : 2013
JSM Spine
ISSN : 2578-3181
Launched : 2016
Archives of Palliative Care
ISSN : 2573-1165
Launched : 2016
JSM Nutritional Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3203
Launched : 2017
Annals of Neurodegenerative Disorders
ISSN : 2476-2032
Launched : 2016
Journal of Fever
ISSN : 2641-7782
Launched : 2017
JSM Bone Marrow Research
ISSN : 2578-3351
Launched : 2016
JSM Mathematics and Statistics
ISSN : 2578-3173
Launched : 2014
Journal of Autoimmunity and Research
ISSN : 2573-1173
Launched : 2014
JSM Arthritis
ISSN : 2475-9155
Launched : 2016
JSM Head and Neck Cancer-Cases and Reviews
ISSN : 2573-1610
Launched : 2016
JSM General Surgery Cases and Images
ISSN : 2573-1564
Launched : 2016
JSM Anatomy and Physiology
ISSN : 2573-1262
Launched : 2016
JSM Dental Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1548
Launched : 2016
Annals of Emergency Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1017
Launched : 2016
Annals of Mens Health and Wellness
ISSN : 2641-7707
Launched : 2017
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Health Care
ISSN : 2576-0084
Launched : 2018
Journal of Chronic Diseases and Management
ISSN : 2573-1300
Launched : 2016
Annals of Vaccines and Immunization
ISSN : 2378-9379
Launched : 2014
JSM Heart Surgery Cases and Images
ISSN : 2578-3157
Launched : 2016
Annals of Reproductive Medicine and Treatment
ISSN : 2573-1092
Launched : 2016
JSM Brain Science
ISSN : 2573-1289
Launched : 2016
JSM Biomarkers
ISSN : 2578-3815
Launched : 2014
JSM Biology
ISSN : 2475-9392
Launched : 2016
Archives of Stem Cell and Research
ISSN : 2578-3580
Launched : 2014
Annals of Clinical and Medical Microbiology
ISSN : 2578-3629
Launched : 2014
JSM Pediatric Surgery
ISSN : 2578-3149
Launched : 2017
Journal of Memory Disorder and Rehabilitation
ISSN : 2578-319X
Launched : 2016
JSM Tropical Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2578-3165
Launched : 2016
JSM Head and Face Medicine
ISSN : 2578-3793
Launched : 2016
JSM Cardiothoracic Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1297
Launched : 2016
JSM Bone and Joint Diseases
ISSN : 2578-3351
Launched : 2017
JSM Bioavailability and Bioequivalence
ISSN : 2641-7812
Launched : 2017
JSM Atherosclerosis
ISSN : 2573-1270
Launched : 2016
Journal of Genitourinary Disorders
ISSN : 2641-7790
Launched : 2017
Journal of Fractures and Sprains
ISSN : 2578-3831
Launched : 2016
Journal of Autism and Epilepsy
ISSN : 2641-7774
Launched : 2016
Annals of Marine Biology and Research
ISSN : 2573-105X
Launched : 2014
JSM Health Education & Primary Health Care
ISSN : 2578-3777
Launched : 2016
JSM Communication Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3807
Launched : 2016
Annals of Musculoskeletal Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3599
Launched : 2016
Annals of Virology and Research
ISSN : 2573-1122
Launched : 2014
JSM Renal Medicine
ISSN : 2573-1637
Launched : 2016
Journal of Muscle Health
ISSN : 2578-3823
Launched : 2016
JSM Genetics and Genomics
ISSN : 2334-1823
Launched : 2013
JSM Anxiety and Depression
ISSN : 2475-9139
Launched : 2016
Clinical Journal of Heart Diseases
ISSN : 2641-7766
Launched : 2016
Annals of Medicinal Chemistry and Research
ISSN : 2378-9336
Launched : 2014
JSM Pain and Management
ISSN : 2578-3378
Launched : 2016
JSM Women's Health
ISSN : 2578-3696
Launched : 2016
Clinical Research in HIV or AIDS
ISSN : 2374-0094
Launched : 2013
Journal of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Obesity
ISSN : 2333-6692
Launched : 2013
Journal of Substance Abuse and Alcoholism
ISSN : 2373-9363
Launched : 2013
JSM Neurosurgery and Spine
ISSN : 2373-9479
Launched : 2013
Journal of Liver and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2379-0830
Launched : 2014
Journal of Drug Design and Research
ISSN : 2379-089X
Launched : 2014
JSM Clinical Oncology and Research
ISSN : 2373-938X
Launched : 2013
JSM Bioinformatics, Genomics and Proteomics
ISSN : 2576-1102
Launched : 2014
JSM Chemistry
ISSN : 2334-1831
Launched : 2013
Journal of Trauma and Care
ISSN : 2573-1246
Launched : 2014
JSM Surgical Oncology and Research
ISSN : 2578-3688
Launched : 2016
Annals of Food Processing and Preservation
ISSN : 2573-1033
Launched : 2016
Journal of Radiology and Radiation Therapy
ISSN : 2333-7095
Launched : 2013
JSM Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
ISSN : 2578-3572
Launched : 2016
Annals of Clinical Pathology
ISSN : 2373-9282
Launched : 2013
Annals of Cardiovascular Diseases
ISSN : 2641-7731
Launched : 2016
Journal of Behavior
ISSN : 2576-0076
Launched : 2016
Annals of Clinical and Experimental Metabolism
ISSN : 2572-2492
Launched : 2016
Clinical Research in Infectious Diseases
ISSN : 2379-0636
Launched : 2013
JSM Microbiology
ISSN : 2333-6455
Launched : 2013
Journal of Urology and Research
ISSN : 2379-951X
Launched : 2014
Journal of Family Medicine and Community Health
ISSN : 2379-0547
Launched : 2013
Annals of Pregnancy and Care
ISSN : 2578-336X
Launched : 2017
JSM Cell and Developmental Biology
ISSN : 2379-061X
Launched : 2013
Annals of Aquaculture and Research
ISSN : 2379-0881
Launched : 2014
Clinical Research in Pulmonology
ISSN : 2333-6625
Launched : 2013
Journal of Immunology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2333-6714
Launched : 2013
Annals of Forensic Research and Analysis
ISSN : 2378-9476
Launched : 2014
JSM Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
ISSN : 2333-7109
Launched : 2013
Annals of Breast Cancer Research
ISSN : 2641-7685
Launched : 2016
Annals of Gerontology and Geriatric Research
ISSN : 2378-9409
Launched : 2014
Journal of Sleep Medicine and Disorders
ISSN : 2379-0822
Launched : 2014
JSM Burns and Trauma
ISSN : 2475-9406
Launched : 2016
Chemical Engineering and Process Techniques
ISSN : 2333-6633
Launched : 2013
Annals of Clinical Cytology and Pathology
ISSN : 2475-9430
Launched : 2014
JSM Allergy and Asthma
ISSN : 2573-1254
Launched : 2016
Journal of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
ISSN : 2334-2307
Launched : 2013
Annals of Sports Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2379-0571
Launched : 2014
JSM Sexual Medicine
ISSN : 2578-3718
Launched : 2016
Annals of Vascular Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2378-9344
Launched : 2014
JSM Biotechnology and Biomedical Engineering
ISSN : 2333-7117
Launched : 2013
Journal of Hematology and Transfusion
ISSN : 2333-6684
Launched : 2013
JSM Environmental Science and Ecology
ISSN : 2333-7141
Launched : 2013
Journal of Cardiology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2333-6676
Launched : 2013
JSM Nanotechnology and Nanomedicine
ISSN : 2334-1815
Launched : 2013
Journal of Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders
ISSN : 2475-9473
Launched : 2016
JSM Ophthalmology
ISSN : 2333-6447
Launched : 2013
Journal of Pharmacology and Clinical Toxicology
ISSN : 2333-7079
Launched : 2013
Annals of Psychiatry and Mental Health
ISSN : 2374-0124
Launched : 2013
Medical Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
ISSN : 2333-6439
Launched : 2013
Annals of Pediatrics and Child Health
ISSN : 2373-9312
Launched : 2013
JSM Clinical Pharmaceutics
ISSN : 2379-9498
Launched : 2014
JSM Foot and Ankle
ISSN : 2475-9112
Launched : 2016
JSM Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementia
ISSN : 2378-9565
Launched : 2014
Journal of Addiction Medicine and Therapy
ISSN : 2333-665X
Launched : 2013
Journal of Veterinary Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2378-931X
Launched : 2013
Annals of Public Health and Research
ISSN : 2378-9328
Launched : 2014
Annals of Orthopedics and Rheumatology
ISSN : 2373-9290
Launched : 2013
Journal of Clinical Nephrology and Research
ISSN : 2379-0652
Launched : 2014
Annals of Community Medicine and Practice
ISSN : 2475-9465
Launched : 2014
Annals of Biometrics and Biostatistics
ISSN : 2374-0116
Launched : 2013
JSM Clinical Case Reports
ISSN : 2373-9819
Launched : 2013
Journal of Cancer Biology and Research
ISSN : 2373-9436
Launched : 2013
Journal of Surgery and Transplantation Science
ISSN : 2379-0911
Launched : 2013
Journal of Dermatology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2373-9371
Launched : 2013
JSM Gastroenterology and Hepatology
ISSN : 2373-9487
Launched : 2013
Annals of Nursing and Practice
ISSN : 2379-9501
Launched : 2014
JSM Dentistry
ISSN : 2333-7133
Launched : 2013
Author Information X