Loading

Annals of Food Processing and Preservation

Antimicrobial Activities of Leaves Extracts of Mistol (Ziziphus mistol), Algarrobo blanco (Prosopis alba) and Tusca (Acacia Aroma) to be Applied to Meat Products Preservation

Research Article | Open Access

  • 1. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, Universidad Nacional de Santiago del Estero, Argentina
  • 2. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas de la República Argentina, Universidad Nacional de Santiago del Estero, Argentina
  • 3. Facultad de Agronomía y Agroindustria, Universidad Nacional de Santiago del Estero, Argentina
+ Show More - Show Less
Corresponding Authors
Sandra Luz Matrínez, Instituto de ciencia y Tecnología de los Alimentos, Facultad de Agronomía y Agroindustrias. Universidad Nacional de Santiago del Estero. Av Belgano (S) 1912. Santiago del Estero CP 4200. Argentina
Abstract

The aim of the present study is to analyze the in vitro antioxidant activity against pathogens such as Salmonella, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus sp, Bacillus cereus, Micrococcus, Escherichia coli and Listeria innocua using Ziziphus mistol (Mistol), Prosopis alba (Algarrobo blanco) and Acacia aroma (Tusca) extracts with 70% acetone and 50% ethanol as solvents extraction as antibacterial. Determination was made by agar disk diffusion method. All the extracts showed some antibacterial activity, however, Bacillus cereus was more resistant and Staphylococcus aureus was more sensitive to the extracts evaluated in comparison with the other strains of bacteria used in the test. Nevertheless, Algarrobo blanco extracts in 50% ethanol significantly inhibited the growth of Staphylococcus sp. Therefore, extracts Mistol, Algarrobo blanco and Tusca could have potential as natural preservatives for fresh meat products.

Keywords


•    Mistol
•    Algarrobo blanco
•    Tusca
•    Antibacterial activity
•    Pathogenic bacteria

Citation

Ruiz S, Nediani T, García M, Martínez SL (2017) Antimicrobial Activities of Leaves Extracts of Mistol (Ziziphus mistol), Algarrobo blanco (Prosopis alba) and Tusca (Acacia Aroma) to be Applied to Meat Products Preservation. Ann Food Process Preserv 2(2): 1018.

INTRODUCTION

In the past numerous native populations distributed by different parts of the world had as a base of survival the diverse products that extracted from the native forests, which contributed to popular knowledge up to the present day [1].

Santiago del Estero belongs to the Great American Chaco, rich in vegetation which is characterized by having several natives spices such as Algarrobo blanco (Prosopis alba), Tusca (Acacia aroma) and Mistol (Ziziphuz mistol) [2] among others, that are attributed different properties such as medicinal, antioxidant and antimicrobial [1]. Algarrobo blanco develops naturally in argentinian Chaco and it is a spice with a lot of chemicals compounds in their different tissues, so it could be considered an interesting source of natural preservatives and additives with antioxidants capacity [3]. Mistol is a spinipherous fruit tree, sweet and edible, it is native from center- north of Argentina, characteristic of Dry Chaco, which has leaves rich in phenolic compounds [4]. On the other hand, Tusca is a native spice from Tucumán, Santiago del Estero, Salta, Catamarca, La Rioja, Formosa, Chaco, Córdoba, San Luis and Santa Fé, in Argentina [5] and like the previous ones, its leaves, stems and flowers are rich in phenolic compounds.

The use of plants is an economic and very important source of obtaining vegetal extracts with antimicrobial activity [6]. There have been numerous investigations in medicinal and edible plants regarding the obtaining of bioactive compounds [7-9]. The demand for fresh product minimally treated is increasing [10] and consumers prefer products with the fewest additives and preservatives [11-13] which in addition to their nutritional function provide other health characteristics such as functional foods. Due to this, it has been increasing the use of natural antimicrobial agents [10] derived from animal, plants and microbial sources [14]. In addition, many synthetic preservatives such as butylated hidroxylanisole (BHA), butylated hidroxytoluene (BHT) and tertiary butyl hidroquinone (THBQ) have been successfully used to prevent the spoilage in meat products [15]. However, the use of synthetic antimicrobial agents is currently questioned, which had led to the need to seek conservation alternatives [10] and the industry has been replacing artificial by natural preservatives generating a trend in the food industry [16].

Antimicrobials are used in food for two main reasons: to control natural spoilage process (food preservation) and to prevent or control growth of microorganisms, including pathogenic microorganisms (food safety) [14]. Because of this, microbial growth during storage can be reduced by applying antimicrobial agents to be meat products, leading to a retardation of spoilage, extension of shelf life and maintenance of quality and safety [17].

As opposed to synthetic compounds, natural preservatives are generally obtained from plants [18] rich in phenolic compounds with antimicrobial and antioxidant properties [19,10] and can enhance overall quality through the decrease in microbial growth and also the lipid oxidation, thanks to the antioxidant activity of this phenolic compounds [18]. In addition to this, being obtained from natural sources would be considered safe for those who consume it [10].

The aim of the present study was to determine the in vitro antimicrobial activity of Mistol, Algarrobo blanco and Tusca leaves using 70% acetone and 50% ethanol as solvents to be used as additives in foods products, obtaining added value to these native and abundant species from Santiago del Estero, Argentina.

 

 

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plant materials

Leaves of Mistol (Zizhipus mistol), Algarrobo blanco (Prosopis alba) and Tusca (Acacia aroma) were collected from the Experimental Annex Field “Francisco Cantos” of the Experimental Agricultural Station of Santiago del Estero of INTA.

The extracts were obtained at the Chemical Laboratories of the National University of Santiago del Estero (UNSE) and the antimicrobial activity was determined in the Pilot Plant of Food Processing of UNSE.

Leaves were collected during November and December, and a pool of this leaves (three plants of each spices) were analyzed in a sample composed by species. They were harvested green and dried at room temperature in closed rooms, then packed and frozen until use.

Preparation of extracts

0,1g of plant material was used and 10ml of 1% extract was prepared using the following solvents: 50% ethanol and 70% acetone. The extracted material was subjected to ultrasounds periods in a cooled water bath every 15 minutes for 1 hour using ultrasound equipment (Branson 2210 R- MT Ultrasonic Cleaner, USA). Subsequently, the residue was separated from supernatant and the latter was centrifuged at 3000 grams per minute for 15 minutes at room temperature. The supernatant obtained was transferred to a 10 ml flask and made up. The extracts were stored in a refrigerator in opaque bottles until further analysis.

Evaluation of in vitro antibacterial activity

Bacterial strains and culture conditions: A total of seven bacterial strains were used to evaluate the antimicrobial effects of the leaves extracts. These include five strains of Gram- positive bacteria (Staphylococcus sp., Staphylococcus aureus, Listeria innocua, Bacillus cereus and Micrococcus luteus) and two Gramnegative bacteria (Salmonella and Escherichia coli). All strains used are well known food- borne bacterial pathogens in meat products. The strains were isolated and identified in the Chair of Microbiology, Department of Food Sciences of the Faculty of Agronomy and Agroindustries of the National University of Santiago del Estero.

Before they were used, the bacterial strains were activated by inoculation in Brain Heart Infusion (BHI broth, Britania. Argentina). 10µl of culture was transferred to a ten ml liquid medium and the inoculated media were incubated at 37° C for 24 h to obtain cells in the exponential phase.

Agar disk diffusion method: Antibacterial activity of ethanolic and acetonic extracts was determined using Gram positive strains (Staphylococcus sp., Staphylococcus aureus, Listeria innocua, Bacillus cereus and Micrococcus luteus) and Gram negative strains (Salmonella and Escherichia coli). The antibacterial activity was evaluated by agar disk diffusion method described by [19] 100µl aliquot of active bacteria containing >106 cfu/ml (measured with the Mc Farland scale) was spread into the surface of BHI agar to create a microbial lawn and then left to dry. Sterile filter paper disks (6mm diameter) were impregnated with 20µl of each extracts and left to dry before being placed on each inoculated agar. A disk of ciprofloxacin with 5µg was used as positive control and disks with 20µl of 70% acetone and 50% ethanol were employed as negative control to verify its antimicrobial action in the different strains studied. The assay was carried out in triplicate. The plates inoculated were incubated at 37° C for 24 h. After incubation, the antimicrobial activity was determined by measuring the inhibition zone (clear zone) around each paper disk by means of a digital caliper. All measures included the disk diameter.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The antibacterial activity of leaves extracts was measured using agar disk diffusion assay. Various degrees of inhibition against bacterial strains were shown by leaves extracts and the results were given in Table 1. From the results, it was observed that Bacillus cereus (Gram- positive bacteria) was found to be very resistant because there was no inhibition in all extracts studied. On the other hand, Staphylococcus aureus was more sensitive to the extracts evaluated in comparison with the other strains of bacteria used in the test. Nevertheless, Algarrobo blanco extracts in 50% ethanol significantly inhibited the growth of Staphylococcus sp.

The differences in the antibacterial activity of these extracts could be due to the fact reported by several authors, who observed that Gram- positive bacteria is more sensitive than Gram- negative [18], because the latter has an extra protective outer membrane of peptidoglycan, they are usually considerably more resistant to antibacterial agents than their Gram positive counterparts [20,19,5]. In addition, the extracts of these leaves are rich in phenolic compounds [3-5,13], also reported that phenolic compounds from different plant sources could inhibit various food-borne pathogens and there may be relationships between the antibacterial activity and the chemical structures of de phenolic compounds. Also, the phenolic compounds have aromatic nucleus containing polar functional groups (e. g. hydroxyl groups -OH). The presence and position of the hydroxyl groups in phenolic compounds might influence their antimicrobial effectiveness, in this way, the higher the hydroxylation, the greater the toxicity [13]. The hydroxyl groups are highly reactive under aqueous conditions and react with several biomolecules, causing deformation of these molecules, which results in retardation of bacterial growth [21]. Phenolic compounds are also involved in protein and cell wall binding inactivation of bacterial enzymes and intercalation into the bacterial DNA during replication (Brooks, Butel and Morse, 1998; Pelczar, Chan and Krieg, 1988 cited by [18]. In this way, the potentially antimicrobial mechanisms of phenolic compounds include the interruption of function of bacterial cell membranes [18], which could cause considerable morphological alteration and damage of the treated bacteria so as to exert their bacteriostatic or bactericidal effect [13] This explains why vegetal extracts studied to be rich in antioxidant compounds [4,5], have an inhibitory effect against most of the strain bacteria analyzed. [22], have shown that extract obtained from natural sources can prevent food decay and the growth of food borne pathogens, and also can help to increase the storage shelf lives of foods.

Table 1: In vitro Antimicrobial Activity of leaves of Mistol, Tusca and Algarroboblanco extracts.

  In vitro antimicrobial activity
Microbial strains/ 
Antimicrobial
Salmo-nella Bacilus 
cereus
Staphylococcus 
aureus
Staphylococcus 
spp
Escherichia 
coli
Micrococcus 
luteus
Listeria 
innocua
A + - ++ - - - -
B - - ++ +++ - - -
C + - ++ - - - -
D - - ++ - + - ++
E + - ++ - - - -
F - - ++ - - ++ +
C1 - - - - - - -
C2 - - - - - - -
CIP ++ +++ ++ +++ +++ +++ +++
References: - : no inhibition; +: low inhibition; ++: half inhibition; +++: high inhibition. 
A: Prosopis alba 70% acetone; B: Prosopis alba 50% ethanol; C: Zizhypuz mistol 70% acetone D; Zizhypuz mistol 50% ethanol; E: Acacia aroma 70% 
acetone; F: Acacia aroma 50% ethanol; C1: 50% ethanol; C2: 70% acetone; CIP: Ciprofloxacin.
 

 

CONCLUSION

These preliminary results suggest that the extracts obtained under the conditions mentioned in the present study could have antimicrobial effects on certain bacteria, nevertheless it is necessary to deepen these studies in order to stablish the suitability of these extracts as possible preservative natural additives to improve food safety by control of food borne pathogenic bacteria, extending the shelf life of fresh meat products. In view of the use of these extracts in foods, it is planned to carry out this study with microbial reference cultures (MRC) and to determine the toxicity of these extracts to rule out possible harmful effects for the human organism.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This work was supported by Project TUSGO- 1231205- Contributions to the integral development of the west of Santiago del Estero, Argentina- National Institute of Agricultural Technology (INTA). Project PNAIyVA 1120032- Food processing technologies (INTA). Project N° 23 / A186, Goats production in sustainable systems: costs and meat quality – National University of Santiago del Estero.

REFERENCES

1. Corzo AG, Bravo E, Serrano F, Vattuone A. Actividad antibacteriana de extractos de hojas de Prosopis alba, Griseb, frente a cepas patógenas humanasy fitopatógenas. Quebracho. 2009; 17: 106-114.

2. Araujo P, Iturre MC, Acosta VH, Renolfi RF. Estructura del bosque de La María EEA INTA Santiago del Estero. Quebracho. 2008; 5-19.

3. Tamayo LMA, Arteaga González DM, Garcés YJ. Propiedades farmacológicas del Algarrobo (Hymenaea courbaril Linneaus) de interés para la industria de alimentos. Revista lasallista de Investigación. 2008; 5: 100-111.

4. Colares MN, Arambarri AM. Ziziphus mistol (Rhamnaceae): Morfoanatomía y Arquitectura Foliar. LAT AM J PHARM. 2008; 27: 568-577.

5. Arias ME, Gómez JD, Cudmani NM, Vattuone MA, Isla MI. Antibacterial activity of ethanolic and aqueous extracts of Acacia aroma Gill. ex Hook et Arn. Life Sci. 2004; 75: 191-202.

6. Rodríguez Pedroso AT, Ramirez Arrebato MA, Bautista Baños S, Cruz Triana A, Rivero D. Actividad antifúngica de extractos de Acacia farneciana sobre el crecimiento in vitro de Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici. Revista científica UDO Agrícola. 2012; 12: 91-96.

7. Sánchez E, García S, Heredia N. Extracts of Edible and Medicinal Plants Damage Membranes of Vibrio cholerae. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010; 76: 6888-6894.

8. Arias TB. Diversidad de usos, prácticas de recolección y diferencias según género y edad en el uso de plantas medicinales en Córdoba, Argentina. Boletin Latinoamericano y del Caribe de Plantas Medicinales y Aromáticas. 2009; 8: 389-401.

9. Ardoino SM, Boeris MA, Toso RE. Caracterización fisicoquímica de Prosopis var. Flexuosa (algarrobo) y Prosopis flexuosa var. Depressa (alpataco), plantas y acción farmacológica. R Cie Vet. 2013; 15: 115- 125.

10. Rodríguez Sauceda EN. Uso de agentes antimicrobianos naturales enla conservación de frutas y hortalizas. Revista de sociedad, cultura y desarrollo sustentable. 2011; 7: 153-170.

11. Pérez Chabela ML. Probióticos en productos cárnicos. Nacameh. 2008; 2: 56-62.

12. Kim YS, Hwang CS, Shin DH. Volatile constituents from the leaves of Polygonumcuspidatum S et. Z. and their anti-bacterial activities. Food Microbiol. 2005; 22: 139- 144.

13. Shan B, Cai YZ, Brooks JD, Corke H. Antibacterial properties of Polygonum cuspidatum roots and their major bioactive constituents. Food Chem. 2008; 109: 530-537.

14. Tajkarimi MM, Ibrahim SA, Cliver DO. Antimicrobial herb and spice compounds in food. Food Control. 2010; 21: 1199-1218.

15. Krishnan KR, Babuskin S, Saravana PA, Sasikala M, Sabina K, Archana G, et al. Antimicrobial and antioxidant effects of spice extracts on the shelf life extension of raw chicken meat. Int J Food Microbiol. 2014; 171: 32-40.

16. Valenzuela CV. Pérez PM. Actualización en el uso de antioxidantes naturales derivados de frutas y verduras para prolongar la vida útil de la carne y productos cárneos. Revista Chilena Nutrición. 2016; 43: 188-195.

17. Gómez M, Lorenzo JM. Effect of packaging conditions on shelf-life of fresh foal meat. Meat Sci. 2012; 94: 513-520.

18. Kim SJ, Cho AR, Han J. Antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of leafy Green vegetable extracts and their applications to meat product preservation. Food control. 2013; 29: 112-120.

19. Rodríguez Carpena JG, Morcuende D, Andrade MJ, Kylli P, Estévez M. Avocado (Perseaamericana Mill.) Phenolics, in vitro antioxidant and antimicrobial activities, and inhibition of lipid and protein oxidation in porcine patties. J Agric Food Chem. 2011; 59: 5625- 5635.

20. Ramirez LSA, Diaz HEB. Actividad antibacteriana de extractos y fracciones del Ruibarbo (Rumex conglomeratus). Scientia et Technica. 2007; 1: 122-1701.

21. Domingo D, Lopez BM. Plantas con acción antimicrobiana. Research Gate. Rev Esp Quimioter. 2003; 16: 385- 396.

22. Demirci F, Guven K, Demirci B, Dadandi MY, Baser KHC. Antimicrobial activity of two Pholomis essential oils against food pathogens. Food Control. 2008; 19: 1159- 1164.

23. Di Rienzo JA, Casanoves F, Balzarini MG, Gonzalez L, Tablada M, Robledo CW. InfoStat version 2017. Grupo InfoStat, FCA, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina. URL

Received : 28 Jun 2017
Accepted : 21 Aug 2017
Published : 23 Aug 2017
Journals
Annals of Otolaryngology and Rhinology
ISSN : 2379-948X
Launched : 2014
JSM Schizophrenia
Launched : 2016
Journal of Nausea
Launched : 2020
JSM Internal Medicine
Launched : 2016
JSM Hepatitis
Launched : 2016
JSM Oro Facial Surgeries
ISSN : 2578-3211
Launched : 2016
Journal of Human Nutrition and Food Science
ISSN : 2333-6706
Launched : 2013
JSM Regenerative Medicine and Bioengineering
ISSN : 2379-0490
Launched : 2013
JSM Spine
ISSN : 2578-3181
Launched : 2016
Archives of Palliative Care
ISSN : 2573-1165
Launched : 2016
JSM Nutritional Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3203
Launched : 2017
Annals of Neurodegenerative Disorders
ISSN : 2476-2032
Launched : 2016
Journal of Fever
ISSN : 2641-7782
Launched : 2017
JSM Bone Marrow Research
ISSN : 2578-3351
Launched : 2016
JSM Mathematics and Statistics
ISSN : 2578-3173
Launched : 2014
Journal of Autoimmunity and Research
ISSN : 2573-1173
Launched : 2014
JSM Arthritis
ISSN : 2475-9155
Launched : 2016
JSM Head and Neck Cancer-Cases and Reviews
ISSN : 2573-1610
Launched : 2016
JSM General Surgery Cases and Images
ISSN : 2573-1564
Launched : 2016
JSM Anatomy and Physiology
ISSN : 2573-1262
Launched : 2016
JSM Dental Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1548
Launched : 2016
Annals of Emergency Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1017
Launched : 2016
Annals of Mens Health and Wellness
ISSN : 2641-7707
Launched : 2017
Journal of Preventive Medicine and Health Care
ISSN : 2576-0084
Launched : 2018
Journal of Chronic Diseases and Management
ISSN : 2573-1300
Launched : 2016
Annals of Vaccines and Immunization
ISSN : 2378-9379
Launched : 2014
JSM Heart Surgery Cases and Images
ISSN : 2578-3157
Launched : 2016
Annals of Reproductive Medicine and Treatment
ISSN : 2573-1092
Launched : 2016
JSM Brain Science
ISSN : 2573-1289
Launched : 2016
JSM Biomarkers
ISSN : 2578-3815
Launched : 2014
JSM Biology
ISSN : 2475-9392
Launched : 2016
Archives of Stem Cell and Research
ISSN : 2578-3580
Launched : 2014
Annals of Clinical and Medical Microbiology
ISSN : 2578-3629
Launched : 2014
JSM Pediatric Surgery
ISSN : 2578-3149
Launched : 2017
Journal of Memory Disorder and Rehabilitation
ISSN : 2578-319X
Launched : 2016
JSM Tropical Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2578-3165
Launched : 2016
JSM Head and Face Medicine
ISSN : 2578-3793
Launched : 2016
JSM Cardiothoracic Surgery
ISSN : 2573-1297
Launched : 2016
JSM Bone and Joint Diseases
ISSN : 2578-3351
Launched : 2017
JSM Bioavailability and Bioequivalence
ISSN : 2641-7812
Launched : 2017
JSM Atherosclerosis
ISSN : 2573-1270
Launched : 2016
Journal of Genitourinary Disorders
ISSN : 2641-7790
Launched : 2017
Journal of Fractures and Sprains
ISSN : 2578-3831
Launched : 2016
Journal of Autism and Epilepsy
ISSN : 2641-7774
Launched : 2016
Annals of Marine Biology and Research
ISSN : 2573-105X
Launched : 2014
JSM Health Education & Primary Health Care
ISSN : 2578-3777
Launched : 2016
JSM Communication Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3807
Launched : 2016
Annals of Musculoskeletal Disorders
ISSN : 2578-3599
Launched : 2016
Annals of Virology and Research
ISSN : 2573-1122
Launched : 2014
JSM Renal Medicine
ISSN : 2573-1637
Launched : 2016
Journal of Muscle Health
ISSN : 2578-3823
Launched : 2016
JSM Genetics and Genomics
ISSN : 2334-1823
Launched : 2013
JSM Anxiety and Depression
ISSN : 2475-9139
Launched : 2016
Clinical Journal of Heart Diseases
ISSN : 2641-7766
Launched : 2016
Annals of Medicinal Chemistry and Research
ISSN : 2378-9336
Launched : 2014
JSM Pain and Management
ISSN : 2578-3378
Launched : 2016
JSM Women's Health
ISSN : 2578-3696
Launched : 2016
Clinical Research in HIV or AIDS
ISSN : 2374-0094
Launched : 2013
Journal of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Obesity
ISSN : 2333-6692
Launched : 2013
Journal of Substance Abuse and Alcoholism
ISSN : 2373-9363
Launched : 2013
JSM Neurosurgery and Spine
ISSN : 2373-9479
Launched : 2013
Journal of Liver and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2379-0830
Launched : 2014
Journal of Drug Design and Research
ISSN : 2379-089X
Launched : 2014
JSM Clinical Oncology and Research
ISSN : 2373-938X
Launched : 2013
JSM Bioinformatics, Genomics and Proteomics
ISSN : 2576-1102
Launched : 2014
JSM Chemistry
ISSN : 2334-1831
Launched : 2013
Journal of Trauma and Care
ISSN : 2573-1246
Launched : 2014
JSM Surgical Oncology and Research
ISSN : 2578-3688
Launched : 2016
Journal of Radiology and Radiation Therapy
ISSN : 2333-7095
Launched : 2013
JSM Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
ISSN : 2578-3572
Launched : 2016
Annals of Clinical Pathology
ISSN : 2373-9282
Launched : 2013
Annals of Cardiovascular Diseases
ISSN : 2641-7731
Launched : 2016
Journal of Behavior
ISSN : 2576-0076
Launched : 2016
Annals of Clinical and Experimental Metabolism
ISSN : 2572-2492
Launched : 2016
Clinical Research in Infectious Diseases
ISSN : 2379-0636
Launched : 2013
JSM Microbiology
ISSN : 2333-6455
Launched : 2013
Journal of Urology and Research
ISSN : 2379-951X
Launched : 2014
Journal of Family Medicine and Community Health
ISSN : 2379-0547
Launched : 2013
Annals of Pregnancy and Care
ISSN : 2578-336X
Launched : 2017
JSM Cell and Developmental Biology
ISSN : 2379-061X
Launched : 2013
Annals of Aquaculture and Research
ISSN : 2379-0881
Launched : 2014
Clinical Research in Pulmonology
ISSN : 2333-6625
Launched : 2013
Journal of Immunology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2333-6714
Launched : 2013
Annals of Forensic Research and Analysis
ISSN : 2378-9476
Launched : 2014
JSM Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
ISSN : 2333-7109
Launched : 2013
Annals of Breast Cancer Research
ISSN : 2641-7685
Launched : 2016
Annals of Gerontology and Geriatric Research
ISSN : 2378-9409
Launched : 2014
Journal of Sleep Medicine and Disorders
ISSN : 2379-0822
Launched : 2014
JSM Burns and Trauma
ISSN : 2475-9406
Launched : 2016
Chemical Engineering and Process Techniques
ISSN : 2333-6633
Launched : 2013
Annals of Clinical Cytology and Pathology
ISSN : 2475-9430
Launched : 2014
JSM Allergy and Asthma
ISSN : 2573-1254
Launched : 2016
Journal of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
ISSN : 2334-2307
Launched : 2013
Annals of Sports Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2379-0571
Launched : 2014
JSM Sexual Medicine
ISSN : 2578-3718
Launched : 2016
Annals of Vascular Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2378-9344
Launched : 2014
JSM Biotechnology and Biomedical Engineering
ISSN : 2333-7117
Launched : 2013
Journal of Hematology and Transfusion
ISSN : 2333-6684
Launched : 2013
JSM Environmental Science and Ecology
ISSN : 2333-7141
Launched : 2013
Journal of Cardiology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2333-6676
Launched : 2013
JSM Nanotechnology and Nanomedicine
ISSN : 2334-1815
Launched : 2013
Journal of Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders
ISSN : 2475-9473
Launched : 2016
JSM Ophthalmology
ISSN : 2333-6447
Launched : 2013
Journal of Pharmacology and Clinical Toxicology
ISSN : 2333-7079
Launched : 2013
Annals of Psychiatry and Mental Health
ISSN : 2374-0124
Launched : 2013
Medical Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
ISSN : 2333-6439
Launched : 2013
Annals of Pediatrics and Child Health
ISSN : 2373-9312
Launched : 2013
JSM Clinical Pharmaceutics
ISSN : 2379-9498
Launched : 2014
JSM Foot and Ankle
ISSN : 2475-9112
Launched : 2016
JSM Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementia
ISSN : 2378-9565
Launched : 2014
Journal of Addiction Medicine and Therapy
ISSN : 2333-665X
Launched : 2013
Journal of Veterinary Medicine and Research
ISSN : 2378-931X
Launched : 2013
Annals of Public Health and Research
ISSN : 2378-9328
Launched : 2014
Annals of Orthopedics and Rheumatology
ISSN : 2373-9290
Launched : 2013
Journal of Clinical Nephrology and Research
ISSN : 2379-0652
Launched : 2014
Annals of Community Medicine and Practice
ISSN : 2475-9465
Launched : 2014
Annals of Biometrics and Biostatistics
ISSN : 2374-0116
Launched : 2013
JSM Clinical Case Reports
ISSN : 2373-9819
Launched : 2013
Journal of Cancer Biology and Research
ISSN : 2373-9436
Launched : 2013
Journal of Surgery and Transplantation Science
ISSN : 2379-0911
Launched : 2013
Journal of Dermatology and Clinical Research
ISSN : 2373-9371
Launched : 2013
JSM Gastroenterology and Hepatology
ISSN : 2373-9487
Launched : 2013
Annals of Nursing and Practice
ISSN : 2379-9501
Launched : 2014
JSM Dentistry
ISSN : 2333-7133
Launched : 2013
Author Information X